can anyone send me the .apk of the think free office that comes with our phone? mine was gone agter flashing froyo. i really like that application for text documents. thanks!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
+1 me too did not have it backed up but oddly the SIMS was ;-(
Its in the market...there is a free version with some features, possibly what you need it for, and a paid version, which is very taxing. i cant find it in my backups either.
Email me guys I will send it to u that way [email protected]
for some reason it wont attatch
Here it is. It's deodexed from one of Eugene's roms.
Thank you for posting the file !!
Hey i just wanted to say thanks for pulling thinkfree and uploading it i have been without it for awhile now and miss it its definately better than adobe for reading ebooks. Thanks
DKYang said:
Here it is. It's deodexed from one of Eugene's roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excuse me for my stupid question but I would like to know if it is supported for HTC Wildfire.. I installed the apk file and asks for activation but it gives a message something like "cannot be activated in this hardware device".. The application runs perfectly but every time I run it, it gives me the same message..
Any ideas?
TIA
aggourodolmas said:
Excuse me for my stupid question but I would like to know if it is supported for HTC Wildfire.. I installed the apk file and asks for activation but it gives a message something like "cannot be activated in this hardware device".. The application runs perfectly but every time I run it, it gives me the same message..
Any ideas?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that it was for the Vibrant, so that could be the reason why.
DKYang said:
All I know is that it was for the Vibrant, so that could be the reason why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's true!
After a quick search I didn't find something familiar on Wildfire forums. I was wondering if there is any way to overpass this message for Wildfire. I am not satisfied with Quickoffice that is preinstalled and I find Thinkfree is more useful and powerful when editing a file.
Anyway! Thank you for your quick response! All we have to do is to compromise with this "activation" message or wait for something else in the future!!
aggourodolmas said:
That's true!
After a quick search I didn't find something familiar on Wildfire forums. I was wondering if there is any way to overpass this message for Wildfire. I am not satisfied with Quickoffice that is preinstalled and I find Thinkfree is more useful and powerful when editing a file.
Anyway! Thank you for your quick response! All we have to do is to compromise with this "activation" message or wait for something else in the future!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think there's an available in the Market.
Yes, there is a free version in the Market, but I believe it's not the exact same. Reason why I say that is because when I try to download documents via dropbox/websites, it always says there is a non-compatible app to view it and never downloads it, but when I have this Think Office version installed, everything is fine. Perhaps it's just me, but I find there is a difference between the Vibrant's and Market's version from my experience.
It is true that there is a free version in the Market but it is the free version which is only for viewing. I would like the full version which is for editing as well. The problem is that in Greece paid apps are not supported via Market and still I am with the stock rom, rooted though. Perhaps in the near future I will flash a custom rom to "unclock" paid apps but since then I wanted to know if there is a way to overpass that "activation" message by doing... something...!! maybe edtiting a file with root explorer...
anyway! thank you for your replies!
To get activation you have to edit build.prob from /system directory Change model and board name to GT-I5800 or GT-9000 or others model that you know; like: ro.product.device=GT-I5800 and ro.product.board=GT-I5800, save, reboot, connect to the Net and get activation code
After activated you can change back to orgiginal one
Related
Swype Voice Input Button Coming Soon – Already Present On Samsung Galaxy S And Motorola Droid X
Is this true? Is there a way to get to voice input from the Swype keyboard? If so.... I can't find it.
Edit: I posted this to the wrong forum. Mods... Please move it to General or Development.
unfortunately the easiest way I found to do it is to press and hold on the input line, click "input mode" and then select the Android KB. Kind of a pain, but it works in a pinch.
I am curious as to where that info came from. Would that function have been removed on the T-Mobile version for some reason?
Its not on the Captivate either. But it IS on the Droid X.
Pneumatic said:
Swype Voice Input Button Coming Soon – Already Present On Samsung Galaxy S And Motorola Droid X
Is this true? Is there a way to get to voice input from the Swype keyboard? If so.... I can't find it.
Edit: I posted this to the wrong forum. Mods... Please move it to General or Development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
directly from swype's forum...
http://swype.uservoice.com/forums/55960-swype-for-android-beta/suggestions/530365-voice-input-button
Well, they have it for other phones so you could potentially pull it from another phone (such as the Droid X) and drop it onto yours
If you search, you will find posts by me detailing how to do it. I even fixed some colors to make it easier to use. You pull it from an EVO rom dump and overwrite the one on your phone. Simple. I don't feel like typing it out again.
ttabbal said:
If you search, you will find posts by me detailing how to do it. I even fixed some colors to make it easier to use. You pull it from an EVO rom dump and overwrite the one on your phone. Simple. I don't feel like typing it out again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I been using this for a little while now no issues.
adm1jtg said:
Yes I been using this for a little while now no issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you're not gonna link or upload or help at all? Sad..
beckhamsoccerman said:
And you're not gonna link or upload or help at all? Sad..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you're not going to search at all? Also sad.
We can't upload it. XDA has banned all Swype APKs as they got threatened by the Swype company. So you need to find it yourself. It's really not that hard, google will turn it up. It kind of sucks to have to download a ROM dump for a small file, but that's copyright for you. If you look hard enough, you should be able to find a copy of just the APK on Rapidshare or similar. It seems people post them frequently enough.
Ask the Swype people to quit being morons so we can share the files directly. Or to just release a version for the Vibrant. It's not like the phone can't support it, I use it all the time. They probably want TMobile to pay more for that feature or something like that. It would be nice if they would just put it in the Market and let users choose to pay for it themselves if they want to.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=742084&highlight=swype+voice
ttabbal said:
And you're not going to search at all? Also sad.
We can't upload it. XDA has banned all Swype APKs as they got threatened by the Swype company. So you need to find it yourself. It's really not that hard, google will turn it up. It kind of sucks to have to download a ROM dump for a small file, but that's copyright for you. If you look hard enough, you should be able to find a copy of just the APK on Rapidshare or similar. It seems people post them frequently enough.
Ask the Swype people to quit being morons so we can share the files directly. Or to just release a version for the Vibrant. It's not like the phone can't support it, I use it all the time. They probably want TMobile to pay more for that feature or something like that. It would be nice if they would just put it in the Market and let users choose to pay for it themselves if they want to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Found it with some digging.. wish you would have said that you cant swype with it.. now I'm stuck with this till I go find the vibrant one. Not compatible wrong screen size, but voice does work..
beckhamsoccerman said:
And you're not gonna link or upload or help at all? Sad..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posting swype is against XDA forum rules. I have used the above mentioned swype with both stock and oc4 kernals and not had issues. What I had to do was change the default keyboard to something other then swype, ADB push the new swype file, run the no yellow metamorph.
Since apparently BN is still changing framework.jar, I'm making a thread to allow separate updates/downloads. framework.jar for 1.0.0 is already in market hack/autonooter/autoconfig
1.0.0 - http://www.mediafire.com/?1wb78ollpb1bd78
1.0.1 - http://www.mediafire.com/?37fugab7xo8s3j3
This framework.jar helps you get an Android ID when you first run the Market. You can replace it with the stock version once your market is working if you want, but leaving it shouldn't cause any issues either.
Um, this thread is remarkably empty.
Thank you for your work!
Not having to generate ID's manually is better than awesome ...
What did you have to change in Framework.jar I know your hacked version works. I'd just like to understand why.
johnopsec said:
What did you have to change in Framework.jar I know your hacked version works. I'd just like to understand why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google requests a valid phone ID and phone type when assigning an Android ID. Tablets tend to have neither, so Google doesn't assign an ID. It spoofs a valid phone type and ID so that Google is happy and will send you back an ID.
clockworx said:
Google requests a valid phone ID and phone type when assigning an Android ID. Tablets tend to have neither, so Google doesn't assign an ID. It spoofs a valid phone type and ID so that Google is happy and will send you back an ID.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. That makes sense now.
Can somebody post the stock version of either of the two files from the OP? I'm trying to get this working on the eLocity tab and, since I'm no developer, I need to compare the two files to see what Clockworx change... and therefore, what I should try changing in our framework.
Thanks!
Billy
JeepFreak said:
Can somebody post the stock version of either of the two files from the OP? I'm trying to get this working on the eLocity tab and, since I'm no developer, I need to compare the two files to see what Clockworx change... and therefore, what I should try changing in our framework.
Thanks!
Billy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to post your framework.jar, it would probably be faster.
clockworx said:
If you want to post your framework.jar, it would probably be faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fine by me! I was tying not to be a bother
http://www.slicky.net/android/elocity.a7.framework.jar
Thanks a bunch!
Billy
JeepFreak said:
Fine by me! I was tying not to be a bother
http://www.slicky.net/android/elocity.a7.framework.jar
Thanks a bunch!
Billy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here it is if you want to take a shot.
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?dd9zif5h89ve7mz
I would back up your stock one and ensure you can restore it, just in case.
This might not be the place or already covered, but is it possible to make the big button in the notification bar not pop up the B&N Soft Buttons? I tend to hit that far too often.
Personally if it was gone, or did nothing, I'd be happy. I can launch the apps from ADW myself, they're all individual apps anyway.
clockworx said:
Here it is if you want to take a shot.
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?dd9zif5h89ve7mz
I would back up your stock one and ensure you can restore it, just in case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome man! Thanks a bunch!
Billy
clockworx,
can i replace framework.jar from slide_update.zip (BN 1.0.1) with yours
and also what i said in your other thread (supernooter) and then flash the ereader.
I am asking too many questions as i dont want to end up with an over sized 7" ice scraper...
I'm in the same spot as JeepFreak, but mine's a Cruz Reader.
If i upload the framework.jar can you mod it?
P.S. its Eclair-2.0 otherwise i'd try and use an existing copy off the web.
Skwurlsoft said:
I'm in the same spot as JeepFreak, but mine's a Cruz Reader.
If i upload the framework.jar can you mod it?
P.S. its Eclair-2.0 otherwise i'd try and use an existing copy off the web.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using a custom firmware for it? I could have sworn someone had already done it for the CR over at Slatedroid. If not, feel free to upload and link.
Skwurlsoft said:
I'm in the same spot as JeepFreak, but mine's a Cruz Reader.
If i upload the framework.jar can you mod it?
P.S. its Eclair-2.0 otherwise i'd try and use an existing copy off the web.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We actually ended up getting the eLocity going without using the modified framework.jar.
Billy
clockworx said:
Are you using a custom firmware for it? I could have sworn someone had already done it for the CR over at Slatedroid. If not, feel free to upload and link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, stock firmware, I've been trying to re-create the custom firmware that Velocity Micro made for it, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly what settings they used for the kernel config. I'd like to eventually roll my own firmware image and update the device to either Éclair-2.1 or Froyo-2.2, but that will be awhile.
Until just now I'd never heard of Slatedroid, so i wouldn't know if anyone has succeeded over there or not. I've tried searching using Yahoo, Google and others to no avail, so...
here's the framework.jar, pulled from the most recent firmware update
(version 091257)
'mediafire'/?c76hrb1awmtc4mq
sorry 'bout the link being butchered, I'm a new user and it won't let me post links.
thanks in advance
Edit:I found the post at Slatedroid, but he's using a modded Cruz 102/103 Tablet firmware with Éclair-2.1, and until I get my own rom cooked, I'm going to try and stay as 'stock' as possible. besides, i don't know if the Cruz 103 firmware will work on the reader.
On another note, would it be possible to pre-mod the file in question if you were building from source?
and if so, what modifications would need to be made?
clockworx said:
Google requests a valid phone ID and phone type when assigning an Android ID. Tablets tend to have neither, so Google doesn't assign an ID. It spoofs a valid phone type and ID so that Google is happy and will send you back an ID.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am working with others in another thread to determine why nootering the NC removes the access to B&N instore features.
We have been trying changes to the build.prop file but this does not seem to help. My thought is that something is changed in the framework.jar file that when instore B&N checks to see if the device is a NC. Is this a plausible thought? Can you share what lines in the hacked framework.jar are different that the stock NC framework.jar? Would it be possible to change these lines back to stock after nootering to gain access to the instore features?
Also, could changes in framework.jar also expalin why the market on NC does not have access to some apps?
nikto34 said:
We have been trying changes to the build.prop file but this does not seem to help. My thought is that something is changed in the framework.jar file that when instore B&N checks to see if the device is a NC. Is this a plausible thought?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything is possible since we don't know what they're doing, but it seems unlikely BN would check phone type and phone ID when on a regular nook they probably both return "invalid". Before you go through the trouble of investigating deeper, I suggest taking the engineering approach and change one variable: push back a stock framework.jar and see if the store works. If it does, then it's the framework.jar. If it doesn't, then it's something else.
nikto34 said:
Also, could changes in framework.jar also expalin why the market on NC does not have access to some apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that would be the fingerprint needed in build.prop, which I thought had already been solved and was part of Autonooter.
clockworx said:
Anything is possible since we don't know what they're doing, but it seems unlikely BN would check phone type and phone ID when on a regular nook they probably both return "invalid". Before you go through the trouble of investigating deeper, I suggest taking the engineering approach and change one variable: push back a stock framework.jar and see if the store works. If it does, then it's the framework.jar. If it doesn't, then it's something else.
No, that would be the fingerprint needed in build.prop, which I thought had already been solved and was part of Autonooter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the idea! Do you have or know where to find a stock framework.jar?
As for the fingerprint issue, we have tried returning the rooted NC fingerprint back to the stock fingerprint with no success. When replicating the stock build.prop file on a rooted NC, instore features still do not work and some apps are still not available in the market.
I saw a youtube video today of this app - and I really liked that you could draw with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPCL5ZNlSo
I'm not sure if there is any other app like this or not, but I have the APK file. When I try to install, it just says "Application Not Installed" presumably because some signature doesn't match up with it not being a Flyer tablet. Anybody know any way around this?
There is no app called tab notes that might work for you.
A little help please?
I'm a total noob here but I have the same exact question (although for the lenovo thinkpad tablet, not the SGS 10.1). I got the apk for the notes app but I got the same error message when trying to install. I really hope there's a way around this because Lenovo's included app isn't all that great and nothing on the market works as well. I also really want to sideload the HTC Flyer PDF viewer because it allows much easier highlighting and annotation with many fewer steps than ezPDF or Repligo.
Have you tried the Foxit app for pdf annotations? It's the best, IMO (and it's free on the Foxit site).
Wow thanks! I didn't even know that existed. It's definitely a big improvement on the other pdf readers in terms of ease of markup but the pen input definitely needs improvement - it's very jaggedy, but its in beta anyway so maybe they'll work on that.
Excellent,but where do i get the pen from?have anyone buy stylus for tab10.1?
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
darquegt said:
I saw a youtube video today of this app - and I really liked that you could draw with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPCL5ZNlSo
I'm not sure if there is any other app like this or not, but I have the APK file. When I try to install, it just says "Application Not Installed" presumably because some signature doesn't match up with it not being a Flyer tablet. Anybody know any way around this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi
I have exactly same question, did anyone have any luck with this. I don't mind purchasing this application or even something like this, if it is available on the market.
Flaco05 said:
Have you tried the Foxit app for pdf annotations? It's the best, IMO (and it's free on the Foxit site).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a link for us? Can't find it on their website!
animelover said:
Do you have a link for us? Can't find it on their website!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I searched all the web but didn't find the download link. It says, it's an oem version, so it is delivered with hardware.
can someone share the app or a link?
hate to bust anyones bubble here but their tabs have a extra layer ours do not that is a digitizer to make the pen work as good as u see it work there. if you look in the general section a while back i posted a system dump of the jetstream rom and asked if we could use anything and i got my bubble bustered lol
darquegt said:
I saw a youtube video today of this app - and I really liked that you could draw with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPCL5ZNlSo
I'm not sure if there is any other app like this or not, but I have the APK file. When I try to install, it just says "Application Not Installed" presumably because some signature doesn't match up with it not being a Flyer tablet. Anybody know any way around this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you get the apk file? Can you point me where I can get it? Or I can PM you with my dropbox folder if you still have it? Thanks.
I don't know how many chefs read this side of the forum, but I know I'll get my hand slapped for posting this in the development side.
But now that Swype beta is available to pretty much everyone, why are we including the stock version anymore? Everyone seems to do it, and it's difficult to remove to install the beta.
It's obvious that the old version doesn't play nice with Gingerbread's text selection process, and the new version has solved that issue.
Can anyone explain why we're still including an almost useless version?
gspitman said:
I don't know how many chefs read this side of the forum, but I know I'll get my hand slapped for posting this in the development side.
But now that Swype beta is available to pretty much everyone, why are we including the stock version anymore? Everyone seems to do it, and it's difficult to remove to install the beta.
It's obvious that the old version doesn't play nice with Gingerbread's text selection process, and the new version has solved that issue.
Can anyone explain why we're still including an almost useless version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can cook you up a straight stock rom without it. It's only an apk you can uninstall with tb
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
aray92 said:
I can cook you up a straight stock rom without it. It's only an apk you can uninstall with tb
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, but that's not really the point. I can remove it from any ROM, just asking why we're bothering to include something that generally doesn't work with our version of the OS.
gspitman said:
I don't know how many chefs read this side of the forum, but I know I'll get my hand slapped for posting this in the development side.
But now that Swype beta is available to pretty much everyone, why are we including the stock version anymore? Everyone seems to do it, and it's difficult to remove to install the beta.
It's obvious that the old version doesn't play nice with Gingerbread's text selection process, and the new version has solved that issue.
Can anyone explain why we're still including an almost useless version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 10chars
gspitman said:
Thank you, but that's not really the point. I can remove it from any ROM, just asking why we're bothering to include something that generally doesn't work with our version of the OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its included because its the only authorized version allowed to be distributed by the manufacturer, if the developer ( the Rom maker ) included it, swype could get pissed and ask for a take down. you need to sign up for an account and be part of the beta to get it.
so in short.. its against Swype's ToS and EULA. in order to avoid complications, rom makers dont include it
Spyderekz said:
its included because its the only authorized version allowed to be distributed by the manufacturer, if the developer ( the Rom maker ) included it, swype could get pissed and ask for a take down. you need to sign up for an account and be part of the beta to get it.
so in short.. its against Swype's ToS and EULA. in order to avoid complications, rom makers dont include it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's just it, I'm not asking to include the new version... just to NOT include the old one.
The old one doesn't really work, and prevents the easy installation of the new one.
So why include broken software?
gspitman said:
Thank you, but that's not really the point. I can remove it from any ROM, just asking why we're bothering to include something that generally doesn't work with our version of the OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not just the APK, there's a file in system/lib that needs to go too. Last paragraph:
http://forum.swype.com/showthread.p...install-Swype-Swype-PreLoad-Production-Device
Edit: Instead of requesting the devs remove, write a quick script that will remove the old. Then you just need run it once whenever you install a new rom.
lyric911 said:
It's not just the APK, there's a file in system/lib that needs to go too. Last paragraph:
http://forum.swype.com/showthread.p...install-Swype-Swype-PreLoad-Production-Device
Edit: Instead of requesting the devs remove, write a quick script that will remove the old. Then you just need run it once whenever you install a new rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, I know how to remove it, I know that it's possible to remove.
The question that no one is answering is WHY INCLUDE SOFTWARE THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH GINGERBREAD?
Sorry for yelling, but I'm trying to grasp the value of having the original package.
gspitman said:
Again, I know how to remove it, I know that it's possible to remove.
The question that no one is answering is WHY INCLUDE SOFTWARE THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH GINGERBREAD?
Sorry for yelling, but I'm trying to grasp the value of having the original package.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am I the only one who's seeing the same trend here that happened in the movie "Anger Management"?
He's only asking "Who you are." LOL
gspitman said:
Again, I know how to remove it, I know that it's possible to remove.
The question that no one is answering is WHY INCLUDE SOFTWARE THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH GINGERBREAD?
Sorry for yelling, but I'm trying to grasp the value of having the original package.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops. Meant to quote aray92, not you since he/she said only the apk must be removed.
lyric911 said:
It's not just the APK, there's a file in system/lib that needs to go too. Last paragraph:
ht tp://forum.swype.com/showthread.php?2287-Unable-to-uncheck-uninstall-Swype-Swype-PreLoad-Production-Device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the link. The Swype beta always crashed for me and now I know why. I removed the files and now Swype works. Thanks!
I agree, I want to be able to install the latest swype. If I recall correctly, couldn't they make it so we could uninstall? I think that's how it was with OG Evo custom roms.
It's been removed from mine from day one.
I thoroughly inspect my ROM for every instance of software that I don't want.
gspitman said:
That's just it, I'm not asking to include the new version... just to NOT include the old one.
The old one doesn't really work, and prevents the easy installation of the new one.
So why include broken software?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) It works just fine.
2) It takes 10 seconds to uninstall with TB.
3) Did you ever consider the possibility that some people may not have another version of swype?
nabbed said:
1) It works just fine.
2) It takes 10 seconds to uninstall with TB.
3) Did you ever consider the possibility that some people may not have another version of swype?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. It doesn't work right.
2. Takes longer than that including removal of the lib files and a half dozen reboots to get the beta installed
3. F%#@ them. Majority wins and its a fantastic idea to remove it, let's get rid of car panel, Twitter, footprints, friendstream, stocks, htcfacebook, fm radio too
its not in my rom either
NewZJ said:
1. It doesn't work right.
2. Takes longer than that including removal of the lib files and a half dozen reboots to get the beta installed
3. F%#@ them. Majority wins and its a fantastic idea to remove it, let's get rid of car panel, Twitter, footprints, friendstream, stocks, htcfacebook, fm radio too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done, agreed, done, may not play right, and maybe!
anyone got the new Swype beta? Haven't tried it out yet
So I am looking to create a ROM, but in which to do so I also need the basic function apps of the MT4G. So I guess my question is...
Does anyone one either have those files handy or know where I can download them from?
I thought there used to be a google app pack that was .apk, but I can't seem to find it.
Thanks,
Danny
i guess u can download the google apps package from cyanogen mod site
Wow. Thanks. You gave me info, but it would have also been awesome if maybe you left a link for me to follow.
Dragon3912 said:
Wow. Thanks. You gave me info, but it would have also been awesome if maybe you left a link for me to follow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or, you could go to the myTouch 4G Developement section where there should be everything you want. The device database search is in the top right for a reason.
Okay so now my new problem is that my phone is now telling me it has an update, but when the phone reboots into recovery it doesn't let it finish the install. It only gets about 1/4 of the way and then has the error emblem. Does anyone know where I can get the update. I have looked on HTC's website as well as T-Mobile's website and neither of them have the .zip for me to download in order to do it.
If someone has this file that would be really awesome. I know the update isn't that important, but I would really like it.
Thanks in advance,
Danny