post your htc flyer benchmarks here (neocore , quadrant , linpak, nenamark)
any one got one
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
upperkingjr said:
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tablets.use.the same internals as smartphones.
here is mine. how you guys have such a high score?
L.E. got it better!
Has any one tried neocore
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
This was my third run but they were all about the same.
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
drinkluder1 said:
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because your phone is junk! No just kidding, the quadrant score don't mean anything that I can find? On my old sgs I was rooted over clock my bench mark was like 1200 my wife was stock her bench mark was like 700 and to login to the Internet, go into sites, download apps, games everything was the same speed as mine?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
Related
What're you guys stable at? I'm stable with:
480/825 normal
320/600 charging
320/600 screen off(may need to raise because it takes a few seconds for calls to come through?)
I can play things like NFS Shift smoothly, never really had any problem at 825.
Optimus V running Aosp 2.3.4
How do you run at 825 stable!? goddamn champion you are!
I run 320/787 MHz @ smartass Gov
Ima champ, but you a champion lol
I run at 480/806 mhz, but I get kernel panics once in a while...
lol i'm not too sure about that, i heard it has to do with the "batch" your cpu was made in. maybe I gotta good one. I might try 844.
Edit: I'm trying it now...about to run nfs and some quadrants to see if anything goes wrong.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2.3.3 stock with OC kernel .
I tried earlir 245/806 and got 1300+ quadrant score, but i moved back to 600 to save some battery.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
That's my score on quadrant : Performance 245/768.
And that's with neocore:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1121958&highlight=clocked
I remain at 320/729 and its prrfectly stable for me.
Proud owner of lg optimus one
What is your QS result. Which Rom and Kernal are you on with settings?
Omega 5.1
Siyah 1.0.1
1704mhz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Mine was 5133 but for some reason my CPU was clocked at 1000 instead of 1400 even though I had disabled the power saving etc.
sent with SGS3
Quadrant sucks for multi thread SOC's, better to use something like AnTuTu... There is an even better one.. but I forgot what it's called
So does the s3 only uses the full potential when required? Is that why mine is stuck at 1000mhz while it says maximum is 1400?
sent with SGS3
vasp3690 said:
So does the s3 only uses the full potential when required? Is that why mine is stuck at 1000mhz while it says maximum is 1400?
sent with SGS3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to save battery. it'll only go to its fullest when it really needs to - eg. a graphically intensive game etc.
bortak said:
Quadrant sucks for multi thread SOC's, better to use something like AnTuTu... There is an even better one.. but I forgot what it's called
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF Benchmark from Chainfire ???
jje
My quadrant and Antutu scores
Perseus kernel @ 1.8Ghz
JJEgan said:
CF Benchmark from Chainfire ???
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the one. How could I forget :/
5873 with uk stock iys blazing fast phone compared with the note im glad i got it now
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
HI guys I have my LG Optimus G E975 and my score with 3d mark is 11400 points
Wanted compare with this HTC One .. I like both will be buying even this one cos LG n HTC = BEST !
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
HTC ONE for AT&T and Sprint Review/URL]
This link contains bench scores
Ahanix said:
HTC ONE for AT&T and Sprint Review/URL]
This link contains bench scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what?
iEthos said:
what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you illiterate? He linked an article that has bench marks for the phone. You're just rolling into the thread with another phone to tout your scores or something. It's really not necessary since all the information is already out there. Not to mention, the SoC on the phone are the exact same.
Also.... Search better next time...
Your comment is obsolete to me ..
And dont jealous .. you'r pathetic !
And that link am there so u blind then..
Sent from my LG-E975 using xda app-developers app
Everyone just chill out. We don't need to turn the HTC One forums into what some of the others are. It gets old fast and doesn't encourage developers on bit!
yeah when someone above is twatty u cant help persons like that
Sent from my LG-E975 using xda app-developers app
I was an avid user of Chrome on my GNex until I found the stock Browser was faster. Now today, I wanted to see for myself which browser was faster using benchmark tests.
As unreliable as some benchmarks can be, there is some truth regarding scored. The lowest score pictured was on the stock Browser, and chrome had the highest score. I was surprised.
Both tests were, of course, ran with all background apps closed, same governor, cfq scheduler, etc.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
BFirebird101 said:
I was an avid user of Chrome on my GNex until I found the stock Browser was faster. Now today, I wanted to see for myself which browser was faster using benchmark tests.
As unreliable as some benchmarks can be, there is some truth regarding scored. The lowest score pictured was on the stock Browser, and chrome had the highest score. I was surprised.
Both tests were, of course, ran with all background apps closed, same governor, cfq scheduler, etc.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if that "fastest score" is the new stock Android S4.
JerzeyLegend said:
I wonder if that "fastest score" is the new stock Android S4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Hello XDA members,
My friend found a Kernel that allows to clock his phone at 1.2Ghz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
He got it from this YouTube Video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5ta4hUVCc
So with your help can we confirm if it is Fake or Legit?
He did an Antutu Benchmark test and it the difference between the CPU scores were 1, so I think it is fake.
BTW the video is in Spanish!
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
-SyncSoft- said:
Hello XDA members,
My friend found a Kernel that allows to clock his phone at 1.2Ghz.
He got it from this YouTube Video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5ta4hUVCc
So with your help can we confirm if it is Fake or Legit?
He did an Antutu Benchmark test and it the difference between the CPU scores were 1, so I think it is fake.
BTW the video is in Spanish!
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its fake of course as benchmark resulted with 1 score difference. There are some miscalculating with the kernel probably
Angryace said:
its fake of course as benchmark resulted with 1 score difference. There are some miscalculating with the kernel probably
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, I have already stated that I think it is fake. But looking into it more, it looks like an older version of the Rafael.baugis kernel which I think used to have a placebo with the clocking.
Moderator, please close this thread.
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk