Hi all,
I have just seen a post for the HTC Sensation that someone has been able to enable FULL Dual Core abilities on the HTC Sensation. Here is the link to the thread...
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/first-htc-sensation-rom-with-enabled-full-dual-core-support/
As I understand it, our device uses only 1 core and only enables the other core when the first one is being "overloaded". Is this correct? If so then I see benefits to being able to enable both cores on a full time basis to really get this BEAST to FLY!!!
Any talented Dev out there wanna take a shot at this? Is it possible on our device?
Im curious to this as well, but Wont one of the biggest drawbacks be the extra drain on your batteries power?
Syrellaris said:
Im curious to this as well, but Wont one of the biggest drawbacks be the extra drain on your batteries power?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... A very valid question indeed. Perhaps this "mod" would be used by those who may prefer MORE POWER over better battery life?...
Id LOVE to see this phones FULL potential and perhaps this could be controlled by a toggle or an app to turn it on and off on demand thus giving you the best of both worlds?
I would like to know it this is possible too
i was under the impression that the galaxy splits every task evenly between the two cores to eliminate lag and increase efficiency, as it's faster to run a small task on 2 cores than a big task on one and leave the other one not doing anything
yiannisthegreek said:
Hi all,
I have just seen a post for the HTC Sensation that someone has been able to enable FULL Dual Core abilities on the HTC Sensation. Here is the link to the thread...
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/first-htc-sensation-rom-with-enabled-full-dual-core-support/
As I understand it, our device uses only 1 core and only enables the other core when the first one is being "overloaded". Is this correct? If so then I see benefits to being able to enable both cores on a full time basis to really get this BEAST to FLY!!!
Any talented Dev out there wanna take a shot at this? Is it possible on our device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure Qualcomm uses asynchronous on their S3 models, while Sammy has both active at the same time. So in benchmarks the galaxy will always win, since both cores handle the task.
Sent from miuiTouch 4G
The work load is split between the two cores. Look it up on phone arena. Each core its always at work,.splitting they load, more power, and more battery saved.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using the xda premium app.
So what does all of this mean exactly? Does this mean that this can't be done or that it does not need to be done?
Wouldn't the Sensations dual core work like this as well - sharing the load so to speak?
Someone thought it was important to do this on the sensation... isimt anyone interested to see this on the SGSII?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
kotaro_14 said:
The work load is split between the two cores. Look it up on phone arena. Each core its always at work,.splitting they load, more power, and more battery saved.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using the xda premium app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From Ninphetamine-2.1.3 thread
Dual core patch is out for cm7/miui/oxygen roms http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1208198
WOW full dual core usage??? for what?? i dont think there are applications to use it fully.
may be good for the sake of benchmarks.
This has nothing to do with benchmarks or apps that fully utilize two cores, there's more than one process that always runs in the background, having two cores always on should make everything run smoother by splitting the workload between two cores.
This patch might not make much difference on a samsung rom, those run pretty smooth to begin with, but try running miui for a change, its not as fluid as a samsung rom and that's where this patch should shine.
Nice to see this taking some strides... I will now mention this to Criskelo so perhaps he can impliment this into his ROM as week as it is my ROM of choice...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Related
So I have the SetCPU running. I also have CPU Benchmark. It gives me two numbers each time I run the test one at 1100 and one at 1000. Is that because one core is set higher than the other? If so, is there a way to set both cores running at 1100? Thanks.
Don't post questions in development, but yea set CPU only overclockes core 0 only, not both core 0 and core 1.
Roger that. I'll keep that in mind for future reference. Is there a way to overclock both?
I thought I read that someone over in 3d forums worked up a special kernel to fully utilize both cores. This was on a snapdragon of course.
Sent from my Motorola Photon 4g
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised. Oh well. I'm happy with what we got. It made my phone more snappy, so I'm super stoked.
coldblooded79 said:
I thought I read that someone over in 3d forums worked up a special kernel to fully utilize both cores. This was on a snapdragon of course.
Sent from my Motorola Photon 4g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda, freeza made a kernel that supposed to do that, but its sort of unstable and lags on some phones, I tried it and didn't like it. He did recently update it so it maybe fixed. SetCPU is coded for one core, some people posted logcats and confirmed it. Far as I know, emails were sent to the dev so that hes aware of it. So until there's an update in the app its going to stay that way weather a kernel allows it or not.
Thanks, That's all the info I needed. Appreciate it.
That dev's really good. Hopefully he will update it soon. Been using setcpu since the g1 and mytouch days.
So if Setcpu only controls one core, is it worth using on the photon?
I just switched over to the atrix from the infuse.. I have it unlocked and rooted.. Wanting to oc but not fully understanding so I'm taking it slow lol.. But i was wondering. How does the power of the 'FIRST' dual core stack up to compared to todays dual core phones?? Is this still a good phone (Since I just got it) and will it continue to be a good phone?
With a custom kernel, most benchmarks are placing it right under or even with SGSII... not bad considering that phone comes stock with 1.5 GHz dual core.
1.2 you mean?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
here's the thing for me, though: you're installing custom kernels and doing this and that to a phone to get it to perform at max capability.
but, to me, that's slightly artificial considering that if you did the same to another phone, then that phone's benchmarks would also be increased, therefore not really providing any gain for the original device.
that's how I currently see it. is that... correct? or... am I not understanding something...?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
ifalldownalot said:
here's the thing for me, though: you're installing custom kernels and doing this and that to a phone to get it to perform at max capability.
but, to me, that's slightly artificial considering that if you did the same to another phone, then that phone's benchmarks would also be increased, therefore not really providing any gain for the original device.
that's how I currently see it. is that... correct? or... am I not understanding something...?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not running a OC kernel, but Faux's enhanced kernel @ 1 GHz. The main thing was getting rid of motoblur, and freeing up the ram. My benchmarks aren't as fast as the SGSII, but they aren't miles behind either.... not bad considering it's half a year older. I happen to like Nivida's technology too, but that's just a personal preference.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ifalldownalot said:
here's the thing for me, though: you're installing custom kernels and doing this and that to a phone to get it to perform at max capability.
but, to me, that's slightly artificial considering that if you did the same to another phone, then that phone's benchmarks would also be increased, therefore not really providing any gain for the original device.
that's how I currently see it. is that... correct? or... am I not understanding something...?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's correct. Right now, though, the difference is negligible. So negligible that only benchmarks will show the real difference. Now, there's several games that will work only on the Tegra platform because the other CPUs don't have the same capabilities in the graphics department.... though it's not like everyone writes games based on these settings or even optimize other games for them.
navykid0211 said:
I just switched over to the atrix from the infuse.. I have it unlocked and rooted.. Wanting to oc but not fully understanding so I'm taking it slow lol.. But i was wondering. How does the power of the 'FIRST' dual core stack up to compared to todays dual core phones?? Is this still a good phone (Since I just got it) and will it continue to be a good phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahem... Optimus 2X claims the first prize
Anyway I don't have an Atrix 4G, I have an Optimus 2x, same CPU. In my opinion the Tegra seems on-par with the Galaxy S2.
I'm not sure if there is a CM7 for the Atrix, but on my Optimus it is at least 2x faster than the stock rom, benchmarks reflect that too.
SunSpider is a benchmark which basically tests various web rendering tasks and gives a total score at the end
On MIUI / 1.5GHZ the Galaxy S2 scored 1600 or so. On 1GHZ, my Tegra 2 scores 1800! A lot of it appears to be down to software though, rather than raw performance, for reference, an iPhone 4 using Safari gets 4700, an Acer Liquid Metal Black which has some sort of 800MHZ snapdragon (I think?) CPU gets 3800.
The iPhone 3GS on iOS 4.1 got 16,000 or some stupid figure, well below 10,000 on iOS 5 though. In short, I guess what I'm saying is it's more down to your software setup than the hardware, obviously any phone is going to run like crap on a stock rom with 100,000 facebook and twitter apps.
So there is something that I'm trying to figure out.
I am currently running Virus' Infected Eternity 1.5 r31 and using RCMIX 3D v11 kernel. Regardless whether it is overclocked (which I usually run 1.51 ghz) or standard and regardless of whether running a govenor like lagfree or a SetCPU one like performance, when I open the app SystemPanel Monitor it shows only one core running. According to Freeza's thread, his kernel has "dual cores active" and it shows SystemPanel Monitor with two cores running. I switched to Freeza's kernel with Eternity ROM and and checked again and it only shows one core running.
So what I'm trying to figure out is, is this ROM related or am I really only running one core and the other is not used, or otherwise how do I know if both cores are running?
My phone with Eternity ROM is smooth and runs games and videos well with no choppiness so I think it is ok. I just want to know how we can know that both cores are running.
I would also like an answer to this question..
Its because of SetCPU if you remove it and install say CPU Master your second core will be activated.
I thought the latest SetCPU was setup for dual cores?
raptoro07 said:
I thought the latest SetCPU was setup for dual cores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it working?
Yes it its working
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Download stability test...run the first, classic test...hit the home button..not the back button...open your system app and it will show you that both cores work, when needed, on the rom you think is only using one core.
Sent from my Nocturnal E3D using Tapatalk
raptoro07 said:
Yes it its working
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What version of SetCPU are you using? I use system panel it will show you both core running at the same time.
SetCPU 2.2.4 donate version
cruecu said:
Download stability test...run the first, classic test...hit the home button..not the back button...open your system app and it will show you that both cores work, when needed, on the rom you think is only using one core.
Sent from my Nocturnal E3D using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This Worked!! Thanks cruecu. Seems as though if the demand is not there the second core is idle for these particular govenors.
So this begs the questions.....Which is better (for speed and/or battery life), running mostly one core at full speed and then the second when only necessary, or running both simultaneously at half speed? I've seen some discussion on this but it's not real clear.
raptoro07 said:
SetCPU 2.2.4 donate version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that version breaks full time dual core.
raptoro07 said:
This Worked!! Thanks cruecu. Seems as though if the demand is not there the second core is idle for these particular govenors.
So this begs the questions.....Which is better (for speed and/or battery life), running mostly one core at full speed and then the second when only necessary, or running both simultaneously at half speed? I've seen some discussion on this but it's not real clear.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure one has been proven more effective. I personally don't want both cores running all the time...I don't notice a speed increase since clock speed is still the same. Not sure it matters either way, but I will only run a rom that uses second core only when needed
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
cruecu said:
I'm not sure one has been proven more effective. I personally don't want both cores running all the time...I don't notice a speed increase since clock speed is still the same. Not sure it matters either way, but I will only run a rom that uses second core only when needed
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the most part I agree with this statement. The reality is the device feels faster and will benchmark better. The better benchmarking is what sold a lot of people. The question still remains is if the device finishes processing the data in half the time is it using more battery? I personally have not noticed a drain on the battery and it may even be a little better. If you let the device decide when to use the second core it may never use it.
Also on some ROMs like my Fresh ROM you can just delete the dual core script in the init.d folder and it will return to single core mode.
Ok, I have side questions that pertains to this topic.
If we can enable the second core in init.d when the phone boots, AND it actually does useful work then HTC would have had to have put effort into supporting that in their kernel because ASOP Gingerbread does not naively support dual core, right? So that makes me wonder why HTC shipped the 3D with dual core inactive! Unless I'm flat out wrong somewhere HTC must have had a reason, and the only things I can think of are race conditions and battery life.
Full dual cores oc to 1.8 keep my phone nice and warm in the winter
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515a using XDA App
sprinttouch666 said:
Ok, I have side questions that pertains to this topic.
If we can enable the second core in init.d when the phone boots, AND it actually does useful work then HTC would have had to have put effort into supporting that in their kernel because ASOP Gingerbread does not naively support dual core, right? So that makes me wonder why HTC shipped the 3D with dual core inactive! Unless I'm flat out wrong somewhere HTC must have had a reason, and the only things I can think of are race conditions and battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our CPU was not designed to run this way (asynchronous CPU). That is why it is not active all the time. Now Nvidia Tegra processors (synchronous CPU) are designed to run dual core all the time. That also seem to produce better benchmarks.
HTC kernel is designed to run the way the processor was designed. HTC would not override the CPU specs like we would just to make the benchmark better. The theory is that asynchronous CPU would have better battery life. Reality is most XDA members only care about benchmarks so they can show their friends.
zone23 said:
Our CPU was not designed to run this way (asynchronous CPU). That is why it is not active all the time. Now Nvidia Tegra processors (synchronous CPU) are designed to run dual core all the time. That also seem to produce better benchmarks.
HTC kernel is designed to run the way the processor was designed. HTC would not override the CPU specs like we would just to make the benchmark better. The theory is that asynchronous CPU would have better battery life. Reality is most XDA members only care about benchmarks so they can show their friends.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I agree with you in principle, I do have both cores active at all times. I have not noticed any difference in battery life. Yet I have noticed a difference of quite a bit less lag while loading applications and flipping through screens than when CPU1 is idle.
Does it really matter in the long run daily use? Not really. It's a fun tweak and I learned something new by utilizing it.
I did not get a truly noticeable difference in benchmark though.
Is there a Kernel that Supports Dual Core for the 2.3.5 Roms (HydroBliss_3.5)?
PMGRANDS said:
Is there a Kernel that Supports Dual Core for the 2.3.5 Roms (HydroBliss_3.5)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure which, but I can tell you that I am running this 3.5 rom and both cores show active.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1373823
Just wondering if all the new ICS roms have full dual core support for the EVO 3d.
Not sure how you test this. Maybe some could explain.
Please Advise.
Thanks!
zcink said:
Just wondering if all the new ICS roms have full dual core support for the EVO 3d.
Not sure how you test this. Maybe some could explain.
Please Advise.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they don't. If you want to enable dual core support just delete mpdesicion from System and edit a file(i don't remember the name). Also, after you booted on the ROM you can download Quadrant Advanced and make a custom Bench, select CPU and you will see if both cores are availables.
HTC Reseller said:
No, they don't. If you want to enable dual core support just delete mpdesicion from System and edit a file(i don't remember the name). Also, after you booted on the ROM you can download Quadrant Advanced and make a custom Bench, select CPU and you will see if both cores are availables.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I want to do this. Thanks.
.
Here you go zcink, check out this thread. Should be the info you are looking for.
netwokz said:
Here you go zcink, check out this thread. Should be the info you are looking for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This link was very useful and helpful to me. I'm going to print it out and do it to any rom I flash.
Just one more question on this.
Is this also what you would do for GingerBread roms also?
update:
found the answer here:
cobraboy85 said:
performance on 2.3.4 GB will not increase by having both cores on. this is a common misconception about dual core on that platform. the software is not programmed to utilize synchronized multi thread - they handle tasks independently. you are wasting battery, with no performance increase, when using dual core on gingerbread......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK I'm still learning Android.
What has been sort of puzzling to me now suddenly makes sense.
In most of the ICS threads I've been following, people are raving about how good the battery life is. People saying I watched 30 movies, made 118 phone calls and my battery is still 97% charged. Ok I'm exaggerating but anyhow making some unbelievable claims about battery life in ICS.
From what I've reading here at XDA and other forums, ICS taps more resources and uses more memory than GB did to run apps. So why so much better battery life?
Could it be that ICS not being dual core support unless you make it so is only using half the power of the CPU? Sort of like putting a 2 bbl carburetor on a Corvette engine where a 4 bbl would unleash the beast but use more gas?
zcink said:
OK I'm still learning Android.
What has been sort of puzzling to me now suddenly makes sense.
In most of the ICS threads I've been following, people are raving about how good the battery life is. People saying I watched 30 movies, made 118 phone calls and my battery is still 97% charged. Ok I'm exaggerating but anyhow making some unbelievable claims about battery life in ICS.
From what I've reading here at XDA and other forums, ICS taps more resources and uses more memory than GB did to run apps. So why so much better battery life?
Could it be that ICS not being dual core support unless you make it so is only using half the power of the CPU? Sort of like putting a 2 bbl carburetor on a Corvette engine where a 4 bbl would unleash the beast but use more gas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest ics releases have finally fixed the cpu1 always online. System tuner pro can show you current states on CPU states. Again system tuner pro can also FORCE dual core CPU always on.
Better battery life comes from the 3.0 kernel which has better power management, amongst other things.
The second CPU kicks on as needed unless you force it always on, which drains more battery.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
scariola said:
Latest ics releases have finally fixed the cpu1 always online. System tuner pro can show you current states on CPU states. Again system tuner pro can also FORCE dual core CPU always on.
Better battery life comes from the 3.0 kernel which has better power management, amongst other things.
The second CPU kicks on as needed unless you force it always on, which drains more battery.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it would seem by getting system tuner Pro you could turn this feature on and off like a switch.
When you want both cores running for maximum performance just turn it on in system tuner Pro, then turn if off when your done with it?
That would be alot better and easier than editing file commands.
zcink said:
So it would seem by getting system tuner Pro you could turn this feature on and off like a switch.
When you want both cores running for maximum performance just turn it on in system tuner Pro, then turn if off when your done with it?
That would be alot better and easier than editing file commands.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something like that. System tuner pro can force dual core by init.d script or after boot completed. It has boot settings, which you choose. A reboot is needed after changing I believe.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
scariola said:
Something like that. System tuner pro can force dual core by init.d script or after boot completed. It has boot settings, which you choose. A reboot is needed after changing I believe.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. Well its fun learning all this.
Maybe down the road as things get fully developed someone will come out with an app or widget. One where you just click it and turns on both cores on the fly. Call it TurboThruster or something like that. The icon could be flames shooting out of a tailpipe.
As phones develop they'll have quad core and more and more..........
scariola said:
Better battery life comes from the 3.0 kernel which has better power management, amongst other things.
The second CPU kicks on as needed unless you force it always on, which drains more battery.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running ZR3dX (CDMA ICS ROM) which turns on dual core by default. My battery life is still amazing, especially with the screen off. One of the power management things it does is control the radios better too.
Hello everyone!
Right, I bought my htc two days ago from o2 on PAYG off course, I did my own research about the phone and I was happy with the results soo, I bought it.
When I play a game like GTA 3 with a stock settings I get some sort of lag for some reasons, although I thought, because it had the Tegra 3 chip it should run any game without any problem.
The phone is 100% stock!
here is some info in my phone that might help;
Baseband: 3.1204.168.32
Build number: 1.17.206.1
Does anyone have similar problem with the HOX+?
Also, my signal drops sometimes and it does not regain for some reason unless I go to flight mode, ON then off, back to normal. I am with o2/giffgaff, any ideas?
Thanks for your help!:laugh:
AW: [Q] My htc one x+ is laggy while playing a game and signal drops?
There are some major discussions going on around the web regarding gaming performance of this device. Furthermore there are some gaming reviews foot it on you've and so on. They are easy to find if you really look. Just do another search.
But for now here s why:
Tegra 3 is a quite performant soc for a mobile device. But it does have some issues.
First is the bad optimization by game developers. Mostly it's Gameloft. They then to ignore the fact that they should optize their games for different platforms to get a enjoyable gaming experiance. Had been worse. ATM most games are playable.
Next problem is that the graphics processors clock speed is firmly linked to the clock the CPU is running. This means when games do demands little CPU performance GPU will also clock down leading to lags. This has been improved with custom kernel, game updates due to tegra optimizations and custom kernels and ROMs.
Last but not least is that the CPU tends to be running in single core. All in all this service does have a lot of power... Mostly a lot of still unused power but I'm confident devs will go on and improve the situation even more than they already have.
For GTA just lower the graphic settings a bit or try rennovate gaming fix.
For now the only games that are not running for me as they should are GTA iii with some minor lagging, nova 3 playable since latest updates but not enjoyable. And last but not least real racing 3 with most of the time 35+ fps but many drops below 20.
For signal drops: maybe it's bad reception in your area?
Gesendet von meinem HTC One X+ mit Tapatalk 2
Thanks for the answer, I did look around before asking this question but, all I was getting was answers that make no sense!
Soo, as far as I understood is the game developers plus the kernel but, that sounds like the device was not ready for the market yet htc released it!
One more question! do you think the phone is worth keeping?
THE_ said:
Thanks for the answer, I did look around before asking this question but, all I was getting was answers that make no sense!
Soo, as far as I understood is the game developers plus the kernel but, that sounds like the device was not ready for the market yet htc released it!
One more question! do you think the phone is worth keeping?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no - send it to me
but you would be surprised what's possible if you use a different rom.
of course non-sense
the phone is good just HTC tends to cripple every device they release
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
maxwen said:
no - send it to me
but you would be surprised what's possible if you use a different rom.
of course non-sense
the phone is good just HTC tends to cripple every device they release
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I know but I dont want to risk anything yet! :crying:
all the android phones I had were a HTC like the desire, desire z, sensation xe and for now the one x +, I have rooted all of them without a problem but, this phone is still under warranty I would rather wait for an update then root the phone:silly:
THE_ said:
Thanks for the answer, I did look around before asking this question but, all I was getting was answers that make no sense!
Soo, as far as I understood is the game developers plus the kernel but, that sounds like the device was not ready for the market yet htc released it!
One more question! do you think the phone is worth keeping?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you understood what he said. The main point was, the GPU base clock runs at a set frequency directly related to the current clock speed of the CPU. So games like GTA that require little resources from the CPU, do not utilize the GPU to it's fullest. There are some custom kernels that allow the GPU to run at it's max speed regardless of CPU useage.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using Tapatalk 2
AndroHero said:
I don't think you understood what he said. The main point was, the GPU base clock runs at a set frequency directly related to the current clock speed of the CPU. So games like GTA that require little resources from the CPU, do not utilize the GPU to it's fullest. There are some custom kernels that allow the GPU to run at it's max speed regardless of CPU useage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I did and thats why I rooted my phone to Viperx+. I am uing the Viber elitekernel but I am having a problem in setting up the max cpu frequency to 1700, its always stuck on 1150 for some reasons and yeah I am using venom tweaks, any idea?
THE_ said:
Well, I did and thats why I rooted my phone to Viperx+. I am uing the Viber elitekernel but I am having a problem in setting up the max cpu frequency to 1700, its always stuck on 1150 for some reasons and yeah I am using venom tweaks, any idea?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The max Clock Speed is 1600mhz when using all 4 cores, you can only get to 1700mhz when running on a single core. Do you have power saver enabled? That limits CPU frequency.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using Tapatalk 2
AndroHero said:
The max Clock Speed is 1600mhz when using all 4 cores, you can only get to 1700mhz when running on a single core. Do you have power saver enabled? That limits CPU frequency.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found out that the game was not fully optimized for the tigra 3 chip, soo I rooted the phone and used Viperx+ 1.06 rom so I can have more control then the stock rom. Now i can do alot of things like set min/max cpu clocks speeds and soo much more, buttery life is much better now (thanks to SetCPU!!:victory but yeah I knew in the end (after going throw alot of reviews) that phone will use 1.7GHz with the 5th core only!
Is there a way I can run 4 cores at 1.6GHz then running 1 core at 1.7GHz or, if I just set max cpu to 1.6GHz, then I will run the 4 cores?
I am using elitekernel for venom team.
No, I dont use power saver anymore!:laugh: