cm9 being built now - HTC EVO 3D

http://briefmobile.com/cyanogenmod-9-construction-under-way

That's great, how about a stable CM7 for us?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App, drinking a 'tini

Don't think most really care about cm7. I mean if you want to spend days/weeks working on an obsolete OS go for it. That's why no one is working on cm7.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium

Upstater said:
That's great, how about a stable CM7 for us?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App, drinking a 'tini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, would still love a stable CM7. When I got this phone on launch day I told myself that I'll wait to root until there is a stable CM7. Finally I said screw it, and by then I had hboot 1.50. Kinda sucks.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App

flonker said:
Yeah, would still love a stable CM7. When I got this phone on launch day I told myself that I'll wait to root until there is a stable CM7. Finally I said screw it, and by then I had hboot 1.50. Kinda sucks.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should have rooted and then wait for CM7.
but anyways, stable CM7 should be coming.
@cyanogen cyanogen
We're still going to get CM7.2 out the door while CM9 is being worked on.

unknown1205 said:
you should have rooted and then wait for CM7.
but anyways, stable CM7 should be coming.
@cyanogen cyanogen
We're still going to get CM7.2 out the door while CM9 is being worked on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, probably. lol. Didn't think HTC was gonna screw me over like this. Was planning on never buying an HTC product again, but now there are leaks of a possible 2.5ghz quad-core...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App

Ok...I'll ask...what happened to CM"8"?

Holyrolla said:
Ok...I'll ask...what happened to CM"8"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM8 would have been honeycomb.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App

Nevermind...It was as I figured...no Honeycomb...but isn't Honeycomb source in the repo now?
EDIT: Thanks Flonker

Holyrolla said:
Nevermind...It was as I figured...no Honeycomb...but isn't Honeycomb source in the repo now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I think they released it, but now that ICS is the standard for both phones and tabs, it will be interesting to see how much effort gets put into development of honeycomb.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App

Holyrolla said:
Nevermind...It was as I figured...no Honeycomb...but isn't Honeycomb source in the repo now?
EDIT: Thanks Flonker
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in there but not fully tagged throughout like other builds are. So it'd be tough to find all the specific honeycomb parts.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App

This phone has me wanting to drop it for a Galaxy Nexus once it's out...
The 3D I really don't care much about. It was the hardware that sold me. This is un-selling it for me.

thefoodman52 said:
This phone has me wanting to drop it for a Galaxy Nexus once it's out...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Early next year, my wife's contract is up with Verizon and she'll be switching to Sprint. She's volunteered to take my Evo 3D and I plan on snagging either a Galaxy Nexus or whatever the new hotness is at the time. I've always wanted one of the Nexus variants so that's probably what I'll end up with.

Will it be available for EVO 3d gsm?
Sent from a sad Evo 3d gsm owner, using xda app! :'(

rahditzz said:
Will it be available for EVO 3d gsm?
Sent from a sad Evo 3d gsm owner, using xda app! :'(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not without someone developing it.
The EVO 3D GSM dev Forum really needs some help.

ive been using cm7 since it became available and mine has been running great! i dont care much for the 3d or 4g though!

sweet cant wait for this i miss cm7 but want a stable build before i throw it on here. cool stuff tho.

We’ve been hard at work on CM9 since Google released Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) into the wild last month, and things are slowly starting to come together. Google did a great job with ICS and added some really awesome features which in some cases replace or deprecate functionality that we had in CM7, so we are reevaluating all of our customizations. A number of devices are already up and running with CM9, and the focus is currently on getting as many devices ready as we can. The first devices (besides the Nexus S, which you can already get from Koush’s section on ROM Manager) that we’ll have ready will mostly likely be devices based on OMAP4, MSM8660/7X30, and Exynos. We also have some Tegra2 tablets in the pipeline such as the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and Asus Transformer. Our goal is to provide continued support to all CM7 devices back to the QSD8250 series of devices such as the Nexus One. I don’t want to make any promises at this time, but that is the plan. And sorry Droid1 owners, we’re dropping support for you. Time to upgrade
There are a number of challenges that we are up against. Google has made some pretty major changes to the Android framework that break compatibility with older proprietary camera and graphics drivers in order to achieve some pretty insane performance, but I am confident that the team will be able to overcome these issues like we have in the past.
For those of you who like to build CM from source yourself, you probably know that the spin-up time when starting a CM7 build is absurdly long due to the high number of devices in our repository. Koush and Arcee have put together a solution to this problem that adds new devices on-demand to your local repository, saving on both bandwidth and the long startup time. Some other great enhancements are coming too, like a completely overhauled music app, a new file manager, and a new launcher based on stock 4.0.
If you have a Nexus S, you can check out the code and build for yourself today. More devices are on the way, and I’ll send out these status updates as we make more progress.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cm9-progress-update?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Related

Place your ics bets here.

How long do you think until ics is booting on our 3ds?
I place my bet for four days after a system dump drops.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
With cm7... December 18th
My wife hates XDA
htc............april, may
Here's what I'd say...
Bootable on Evo 3D (bootable, but half the stuff won't work) - A few weeks after dump
Stable Bootable (still no 4G, bluetooth, 3D, etc.) - A few weeks-two months after dump
Cyanogenmod 9 (pre-alpha) - A few weeks after stable bootable
HTC Official Update - 3-4 months after official release
yousefak said:
Here's what I'd say...
Bootable on Evo 3D (bootable, but half the stuff won't work) - A few weeks after dump
Stable Bootable (still no 4G, bluetooth, 3D, etc.) - A few weeks-two months after dump
Cyanogenmod 9 (pre-alpha) - A few weeks after stable bootable
HTC Official Update - 3-4 months after official release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate your for your psychic abilities.
yousefak said:
Here's what I'd say...
Bootable on Evo 3D (bootable, but half the stuff won't work) - A few weeks after dump
Stable Bootable (still no 4G, bluetooth, 3D, etc.) - A few weeks-two months after dump
Cyanogenmod 9 (pre-alpha) - A few weeks after stable bootable
HTC Official Update - 3-4 months after official release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel your official HTC is spot on but i feel the devs will have it half working a bit faster then a few weeks .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
bmtdan said:
I feel your official HTC is spot on but i feel the devs will have it half working a bit faster then a few weeks .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-Comment Removed-
yousefak said:
-Comment Removed-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
bmtdan said:
?
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wondering the same I
There's a comment in another thread that's the same
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Sometimes I remove my comments so it doesn't offend some people.
yousefak said:
Sometimes I remove my comments so it doesn't offend some people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok... Then why comment at all lol I mean that's cool you consider other people but some people need to just get over **** sometimes
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
bmtdan said:
I feel your official HTC is spot on but i feel the devs will have it half working a bit faster then a few weeks .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why you say that??? given CM7 status unless toast has a magic trick up his sleeve id say your way off there.
It took them a full month to get 2.2(CM6) on the Evo4G from when the source dropped. least it wasn't released to public till then in nightly build form at that from what i remember.
It takes a while to compile a full build here, they are building from scratch for most part here.
and 2.3 code was released in Dec '10 and the CM7 STABLE version wasn't released till april '11 i think according to their site. yes there were many nightly builds before that but i dont remember nor can i tell by cyanogenmod's site since nightlys are only shown for cm7 now.
but like i said in the other thread toast is not one to doubt on anything as the guy does magical things all the time so anything is possible.
yousefak said:
Sometimes I remove my comments so it doesn't offend some people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair lol as long as you weren't being rude I won't be offended
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
sgt. slaughter said:
why you say that??? given CM7 status unless toast has a magic trick up his sleeve id say your way off there.
It took them a full month to get 2.2(CM6) on the Evo4G from when the source dropped. least it wasn't released to public till then in nightly build form at that from what i remember.
It takes a while to compile a full build here, they are building from scratch for most part here.
and 2.3 code was released in Dec '10 and the CM7 STABLE version wasn't released till april '11 i think according to their site. yes there were many nightly builds before that but i dont remember nor can i tell by cyanogenmod's site since nightlys are only shown for cm7 now.
but like i said in the other thread toast is not one to doubt on anything as the guy does magical things all the time so anything is possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right but cm
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
bmtdan said:
Your right but cm takes a bit longer because of all the awesome tweaks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2-3 months for a stable/complete build after the dump.
It's funny that with all of the new enhancements and UI tweaks that Google has put into ICS, undoubtedly HTC will still push Sense on top of it all to make any update to 4.0 unseen in every way (and still take months to release their "interpretation" of it).
5-6 weeks for an alpha build of CM to hit our phones.
3-doesitreallyevenmatter months for the Sense rendition to hit.
I'm guessing we will see a.other revision of sense to compliment ics... Ateast that's what I would do if u was them,,, just give us the widgets and the apps, Rosie can eat a d*$%
Sent from my HTC Evo 3D using Tapatalk
Idk when we'll see it, but you can boot it on your PC right now:
http://goo.gl/fhq1x
(Forgot about that whole "SDK includes emulator" feature at first.)
If anyone gets this running before I do, please report back!
Edit: Of course, someone already did it, and put it up on youtube:
http://goo.gl/ZaE42
Edit2: So did someone else:
http://goo.gl/DO1mk
mazook98 said:
Idk when we'll see it, but you can boot it on your PC right now:
http://goo.gl/fhq1x
(Forgot about that whole "SDK includes emulator" feature at first.)
If anyone gets this running before I do, please report back!
Edit: Of course, someone already did it, and put it up on youtube:
http://goo.gl/ZaE42
Edit2: So did someone else:
http://goo.gl/DO1mk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SDK was released!
Time to download and test!

Guess we need to move out of the US sprint users

http://gigaom.com/mobile/want-andro...tm_campaign=Feed:+jkOnTheRun+(GigaOM:+Mobile)
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
That really sucks.
Seems like the gist of the message is that US carriers have so much individual bloatware to account for (sprint tv, nascar, vcast, etc) that an HTC or Samsung can't just roll out a generic ICS for each device. That's what sucks.
Almost makes me want to wait until november for the next nexus phone but I can't wait that long and Samsung seems to be on top of their game as far as upgrading to ICS before anyone else.
Yes, Samsung is on top of their game and I can also assure you that once Samsung ICS update.drops, so will their kernel source. There won't be any of the waiting 2-4 months BS that HTC is notorious for to release source.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
P_M_G said:
Seems like the gist of the message is that US carriers have so much individual bloatware to account for (sprint tv, nascar, vcast, etc) that an HTC or Samsung can't just roll out a generic ICS for each device. That's what sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep pretty much.
ncfastls1 said:
Almost makes me want to wait until november for the next nexus phone but I can't wait that long and Samsung seems to be on top of their game as far as upgrading to ICS before anyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
troyboytn said:
Yes, Samsung is on top of their game and I can also assure you that once Samsung ICS update.drops, so will their kernel source. There won't be any of the waiting 2-4 months BS that HTC is notorious for to release source.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm must be recent that Samsung stepped up their game at updating phones.... When I had my Epic 4g (not touch), it took Samsung forever to update to gingerbread.
DarkManX4lf said:
Yep pretty much.
Hmmm must be recent that Samsung stepped up their game at updating phones.... When I had my Epic 4g (not touch), it took Samsung forever to update to gingerbread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wont know for sure till a US variant gets an official update... But they seem to be doing a bit better... And the epic 4g (not touch) gingerbread woes are blamed on alot of things but mostly samsungs failed effort of a update in a timely matter
I've just learned to take a deep breath and enjoy what we have, our devs are making some very good highly efficient sense roms. Ics is super cool don't get me wrong, but must of us are stuck on gingerbread for a while. Might as well find a good rom, flash some themes if need be and relax. Very happy with performance and battery life with the 2.17 base sense rom. Its surely good enough to hold me until the end of the year until ics finally drops. :beer:
sent from a Mean Evo 3d with ICS sprinkles
P_M_G said:
Seems like the gist of the message is that US carriers have so much individual bloatware to account for (sprint tv, nascar, vcast, etc) that an HTC or Samsung can't just roll out a generic ICS for each device. That's what sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which makes zero sense to me bc there's no way those apps req that much testing to be able for the OS upgrade...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
sgt. slaughter said:
Which makes zero sense to me bc there's no way those apps req that much testing to be able for the OS upgrade...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt its just about bloat... HTC sends a build to sprint and they send it back if it has bugs/w.e. And that process is continuous until everything is the way sprint/HTC wants it...
If it was just to add bloat we would have had leaks/ota by now...
(my views/what I heard about it)
I honestly am gonna blame HTC (no support for this phone/constant excuses regarding updates/source)
If they didnt have 50+ devices on the market to deal with (updates and bug fixes) im sure ICS would be here sooner...
Honestly, what's the hype? I flashed ics to my tablet and went right back, not that impressed.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
gilbydakid said:
Honestly, what's the hype? I flashed ics to my tablet and went right back, not that impressed.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like any other os... Bettery life... Speed improvments... Hardware acceleration... All marketing features... I still think gingerbread could be improved
Bear gri11z said:
I doubt its just about bloat... HTC sends a build to sprint and they send it back if it has bugs/w.e. And that process is continuous until everything is the way sprint/HTC wants it...
If it was just to add bloat we would have had leaks/ota by now...
(my views/what I heard about it)
I honestly am gonna blame HTC (no support for this phone/constant excuses regarding updates/source)
If they didnt have 50+ devices on the market to deal with (updates and bug fixes) im sure ICS would be here sooner...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That last part is very true which is why they are trying to downsize the amount of phones they put out this yr
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
troyboytn said:
Yes, Samsung is on top of their game and I can also assure you that once Samsung ICS update.drops, so will their kernel source. There won't be any of the waiting 2-4 months BS that HTC is notorious for to release source.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My next phone will probably be from Samsung...probably (If they keep it up).
NSTar1 said:
My next phone will probably be from Samsung...probably (If they keep it up).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't mind MOTO for their radio but they fail everywhere else
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium

Android Jelly Bean Rumored for Q3 Release

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57402420-94/android-5.0-aka-jelly-bean-rumored-for-q3-release/
Google I/O is in Q3 so we can probably expect it by then.
Just for those of you wondering how long until Jellybean. Hopefully, if they keep releasing new versions, manufacturers will start dropping their skins so they can keep up. (I know that's never going to happen, but wishful thinking!)
yousefak said:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57402420-94/android-5.0-aka-jelly-bean-rumored-for-q3-release/
Google I/O is in Q3 so we can probably expect it by then.
Just for those of you wondering how long until Jellybean. Hopefully, if they keep releasing new versions, manufacturers will start dropping their skins so they can keep up. (I know that's never going to happen, but wishful thinking!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
I wonder if HTC will just give up and release just ICS for their older phones and work on Jelly Bean for their new ones
Bloody HTC, I doubt our phones will ever get an official release of this.
poweroutlet said:
Bloody HTC, I doubt our phones will ever get an official release of this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Evo 4G will never and was never planned to receive ICS, and yet there are completely functioning ICS builds available for it, with working camera on top of everything else besides the obvious 4G (and maybe a few other things, I haven't followed OG Evo development since I upgraded to this phone).
Official releases aren't a huge deal unless we need them to fix something. The problem with ICS on our phones have to do with the difference between it and GB, as well as our camera. I do not foresee JB to be a big difference from ICS, kind of like Froyo to GB.
So in the end an official release won't matter as long as JB isn't a huge difference over ICS, and we can use the official ICS release in order to make sure the camera works.
You're going to be able to run JB on this phone, do not worry.
SoraX64 said:
The Evo 4G will never and was never planned to receive ICS, and yet there are completely functioning ICS builds available for it, with working camera on top of everything else besides the obvious 4G (and maybe a few other things, I haven't followed OG Evo development since I upgraded to this phone).
Official releases aren't a huge deal unless we need them to fix something. The problem with ICS on our phones have to do with the difference between it and GB, as well as our camera. I do not foresee JB to be a big difference from ICS, kind of like Froyo to GB.
So in the end an official release won't matter as long as JB isn't a huge difference over ICS, and we can use the official ICS release in order to make sure the camera works.
You're going to be able to run JB on this phone, do not worry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know the phones hardware is more than capable of handling JB. And I'd agree with everything you said, but our phone has some unique needs that others don't. Like you mentioned, the 3d/camera is one of them and also Wimax. ICS has been around for quite a while and there isn't a single ICS build for our phone that is a nice stable daily driver. Getting some of our phone's features to work without the help of HTC may be a bit tough. The development scene of the Evo 3D isn't huge either, though thankfully we have many great devs.
I came to the Evo 3d from the HTC HD2, now that's a phone that seems to be able to run just about anything. Ridiculously massive development scene. It had ICS running long before many other phones and it isn't even an android phone.
poweroutlet said:
I know the phones hardware is more than capable of handling JB. And I'd agree with everything you said, but our phone has some unique needs that others don't. Like you mentioned, the 3d/camera is one of them and also Wimax. ICS has been around for quite a while and there isn't a single ICS build for our phone that is a nice stable daily driver. Getting some of our phone's features to work without the help of HTC may be a bit tough. The development scene of the Evo 3D isn't huge either, though thankfully we have many great devs.
I came to the Evo 3d from the HTC HD2, now that's a phone that seems to be able to run just about anything. Ridiculously massive development scene. It had ICS running long before many other phones and it isn't even an android phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can agree with that, mostly. What I'm trying to say is that, after a release from HTC, we hopefully won't have to worry too much about JB in the future.
Plus as long as jellybean drops within eighteen months technically we are supposed to get it .
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
I would almost be happy if jelly bean would wait, I would like to see a aosp ics rom fully functional first. We haven't seen a really smooth aosp rom out of alpha yet for the 3d. Either way. Just getting tired of sense but that's just me.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
ace9988 said:
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A little optimistic?
ace9988 said:
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol... even though they will initially anounce "early" or "first quarter" 2013!
ace9988 said:
coming to HTC....sometime much later in 2013
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's when we get ics on the 3D
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
People talking about jellybean, not even realizing its not for phones.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
fpineda101 said:
That's when we get ics on the 3D
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao...
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
bloodrain954 said:
People talking about jellybean, not even realizing its not for phones.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not confirmed so I wouldn't spread it like it is.
This is a rumor at time of writing
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Jelly bean Pfft get ICS working before they come out with something else
Sent from my SPH-D600 using XDA Premium App
bloodrain954 said:
People talking about jellybean, not even realizing its not for phones.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Careful with those words as that's not even close to being confirmed...nor does it make much sense...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
sl4sh3r said:
Jelly bean Pfft get ICS working before they come out with something else
Sent from my SPH-D600 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With that I totally agree
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Even when jelly bean gets released you can easily add another 12 months onto that before there's a working evo version
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using XDA
Hey guys, why are people talking about jailbait in this thread?

Kernel Source Useless?

I'm genuinely curious if this big kernel source drop is going to be beneficial to us or not. I've heard two sides to the story:
1. "HTC b trollin' man, they drop source and release a new kernel..."
2. Devs can use the old kernel and fix the issues that HTC fixed, along with the other issues AOSP ROMs were having like sound and MMS.
I have no idea what's going on, and I'm curious whether I should expect things to blow up here soon, or if this kernel source has been essentially useless. I'm generally unaware of how long it takes devs to pick apart the kernel code and utilize it. Any input from those with knowledge on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
PsiPhiDan said:
I'm genuinely curious if this big kernel source drop is going to be beneficial to us or not. I've heard two sides to the story:
1. "HTC b trollin' man, they drop source and release a new kernel..."
2. Devs can use the old kernel and fix the issues that HTC fixed, along with the other issues AOSP ROMs were having like sound and MMS.
I have no idea what's going on, and I'm curious whether I should expect things to blow up here soon, or if this kernel source has been essentially useless. I'm generally unaware of how long it takes devs to pick apart the kernel code and utilize it. Any input from those with knowledge on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Both are correct. It doesn't really help sense based Roms because sense kernels are going to be newer than source.
However, aosp roms can now be fully functional. Aosp is what many people on here care about and are waiting for.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
It's not useless for aosp, the problem is nobody is really working too much on aosp roms. There is a cm and MIUI port but they are a ways off and only so much one person can do..
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Rippley05 said:
It's not useless for aosp, the problem is nobody is really working too much on aosp roms. There is a cm and MIUI port but they are a ways off and only so much one person can do..
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This makes me sad. Maybe the EVO won't have the development I pictured it having after all. I'm not giving up hope for the future, but if you're correct in your assertion, that is saddening.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
PsiPhiDan said:
This makes me sad. Maybe the EVO won't have the development I pictured it having after all. I'm not giving up hope for the future, but if you're correct in your assertion, that is saddening.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It still might, but I think I'm still somewhat jaded by the og evo and the support it had. The 3D never really had much, and it's looking like the lte is gonna be around the same.
I do think we'll eventually get some aosp goodness, just isn't hopping like I hoped it would be. I don't mean this as a slight to the devs we do have because they are great, all of them.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
PsiPhiDan said:
This makes me sad. Maybe the EVO won't have the development I pictured it having after all. I'm not giving up hope for the future, but if you're correct in your assertion, that is saddening.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's only been a little over a month since the phone first came out. Give more people time to transition and we should start to see more activity. It isn't that bad so far, but most development is based around Sense because no one wants to wrestle with AOSP. Once they get AOSP stuff finished though, we'll be golden.
SoraX64 said:
It's only been a little over a month since the phone first came out. Give more people time to transition and we should start to see more activity. It isn't that bad so far, but most development is based around Sense because no one wants to wrestle with AOSP. Once they get AOSP stuff finished though, we'll be golden.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm sure that's true. In my head, I figured everyone would be working to get to that point as quick as possible once kernel source was released. Like a giant team project, haha. Instead, it appears that only a select few are tackling it. Even custom kernels seem to be a rare mention. Oh well, I'll continue to enjoy the Sense ROMs as much as I can until someone cracks the AOSP code.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
PsiPhiDan said:
Yeah, I'm sure that's true. In my head, I figured everyone would be working to get to that point as quick as possible once kernel source was released. Like a giant team project, haha. Instead, it appears that only a select few are tackling it. Even custom kernels seem to be a rare mention. Oh well, I'll continue to enjoy the Sense ROMs as much as I can until someone cracks the AOSP code.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We just need the support of the big guys. For some reason it feels like most of the big time devs haven't moved on to this phone yet, or went with Samsung instead. I know that Preludedrew is working on JB for our phone, I talked to him about it yesterday on Gtalk. Deck mentioned in IRC that he was working on it as well, I believe.
The kernel developers are hiding so far, probably because we don't have the big guys working for us yet. I'd love to see a Tiamat kernel, even if I'm personally not a fan of custom kernels.
Kernel.org is also down, so that's slowing things up for everyone.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Rxpert said:
Kernel.org is also down, so that's slowing things up for everyone.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been seeing this all over, but I can access the site and perform downloads just fine.
There's is (are) custom kernels out
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I'm actually happy with the stock kernel. It has a great balance of performance and battery life.Then again I prefer my kernels to be rock solid, as opposed to cutting edge with random reboots.
fpineda101 said:
I'm actually happy with the stock kernel. It has a great balance of performance and battery life.Then again I prefer my kernels to be rock solid, as opposed to cutting edge with random reboots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always used custom kernels with EVO 4G and remember zero reboots due to kernel issues . Easy overclocking and underclocking, volume mods, performance increases while still improving battery life... Yes please!
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
PsiPhiDan said:
This makes me sad. Maybe the EVO won't have the development I pictured it having after all. I'm not giving up hope for the future, but if you're correct in your assertion, that is saddening.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So far my experience with HTC phones have been a very disappointing one. Coming from the OG Epic, all I've kept hearing was how awesome the development for the OG EVO was. So of course when the EVO 3d came out it was my phone of choice over the Epic Touch. That was disappointment number one. Then when the LTE came out, I've noticed all the OG EVO developers and owners was all excited about this phone, so i decided to give HTC another chance. So for I've been more disappointed then at any point. The lack of ROMS, the pitifully performance of sense 4 and HTC's new stance on locking bootloader and sneaky updates with new Hboots was the last straw. What phone will I get next? Im not sure, but it won't be a HTC.
Sent from my disappointing EVO using xda premium
shook187 said:
So far my experience with HTC phones have been a very disappointing one. Coming from the OG Epic, all I've kept hearing was how awesome the development for the OG EVO was. So of course when the EVO 3d came out it was my phone of choice over the Epic Touch. That was disappointment number one. Then when the LTE came out, I've noticed all the OG EVO developers and owners was all excited about this phone, so i decided to give HTC another chance. So for I've been more disappointed then at any point. The lack of ROMS, the pitifully performance of sense 4 and HTC's new stance on locking bootloader and sneaky updates with new Hboots was the last straw. What phone will I get next? Im not sure, but it won't be a HTC.
Sent from my disappointing EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We've had plenty of roms for this phone. Development has flown. Idk what your complaining about.
HTC has always locked the bootloader and always updated hboot to close root loopholes. This is nothing new.
This is all par for the course. You should know this having owned the 3d. Settle down my man
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Rxpert said:
We've had plenty of roms for this phone. Development has flown. Idk what your complaining about.
HTC has always locked the bootloader and always updated hboot to close root loopholes. This is nothing new.
This is all par for the course. You should know this having owned the 3d. Settle down my man
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what he means about ROMs... They're all more or less the same so far. Modified stock is great, but not what many are after when they think of development being great.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Rxpert said:
We've had plenty of roms for this phone. Development has flown. Idk what your complaining about.
HTC has always locked the bootloader and always updated hboot to close root loopholes. This is nothing new.
This is all par for the course. You should know this having owned the 3d. Settle down my man
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on that. Seems like the other guy isn't to bright seeing as this phone is only a little over a month old
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
PsiPhiDan said:
I know what he means about ROMs... They're all more or less the same so far. Modified stock is great, but not what many are after when they think of development being great.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And aosp is in the works and has been since shortly after launch. These things take time.
If you check out the aosp threads, they all mention ongoing development.
We JUST got kernel source. Devs have day jobs, they do this in their free time
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Rxpert said:
And aosp is in the works and has been since shortly after launch. These things take time.
If you check out the aosp threads, they all mention ongoing development.
We JUST got kernel source. Devs have day jobs, they do this in their free time
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I know that, and I no way meant to say the devs aren't doing great work. I just wanted to explain why he said there were not a lot of ROMs right now. I understand that statement, although there is plenty of reason for why that is.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app

CM9 RC2.....many devices getting love except

http://www.androidcentral.com/cyanogenmod-9-rc2-emerges-new-devices-stability-improvements
So its not like I didn't see it coming when samsung hired steve, but geeeeez. Samsung devices are #1 priority I guess these days. I liked it better when the love was more evenly distibuted. But its good news anyway.
I think this is more news worthy:
CM9? Bleh, who cares.
Samsung also donated some devices to the CM team a while back, and generally release source faster than HTC.
don't they also have a bigger market share?
I haven't had a Samsung smartphone, just posting from what I've seen
miguelfp1 said:
Samsung also donated some devices to the CM team a while back, and generally release source faster than HTC.
don't they also have a bigger market share?
I haven't had a Samsung smartphone, just posting from what I've seen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure Sammy is the biggest smart phone manufacturer in the world.
Honestly, the next phone I get, HTC and Sammy are battling for my money. I said after my Epic that I would never buy another Sammy phone, so I skipped the SII in favor Photon because I felt the 3D was useless. Now that I've played with the SIII and the EVO LTE I am fairly equally impressed by both devices.
It's going to come down to support and device build, who releases source the fastest and who updates the devices the best and which one builds the best feeling device.
Assuming there is an S4 and Sammy doesn't blow it, I could very well see my self getting it.
Kcarpenter said:
I think this is more news worthy:
CM9? Bleh, who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, yea I saw that. Exciting, although I don't expect to see it close to a RC for another few months.
swaze said:
LOL, yea I saw that. Exciting, although I don't expect to see it close to a RC for another few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Few months for RC, yeah...hell some CM's never leave Alpha haha.
Suitable for Daily Driving in a few weeks at most I would say.
where would one find this ROM?
jsufx said:
where would one find this ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not released yet. Still No Wifi and the RIL isn't playing nicely - as is almost always the case with CDMA devices - so No Voice or Data either.
Pretty much from what I gathered it boots and runs and that's about it.
We would get this if we had official support. We knew it wasn't coming for us.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Samsung doesn't release sources quicker than HTC.
And Samsung thinks it's fun to brick our devices. Google emmc brick bug.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
MemoryController said:
Samsung doesn't release sources quicker than HTC.
And Samsung thinks it's fun to brick our devices. Google emmc brick bug.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have been lately.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
What? Still no 4.0.4 kernel sources
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Kcarpenter said:
Pretty sure Sammy is the biggest smart phone manufacturer in the world.
Honestly, the next phone I get, HTC and Sammy are battling for my money. I said after my Epic that I would never buy another Sammy phone, so I skipped the SII in favor Photon because I felt the 3D was useless. Now that I've played with the SIII and the EVO LTE I am fairly equally impressed by both devices.
It's going to come down to support and device build, who releases source the fastest and who updates the devices the best and which one builds the best feeling device.
Assuming there is an S4 and Sammy doesn't blow it, I could very well see my self getting it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does Sammy make all of the Nexus phones? I would get that if I were you, and you're interested in getting lots of updates and development. That'll be my next phone if Sprint doesn't wait 6 months after release to sell it.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
PsiPhiDan said:
Does Sammy make all of the Nexus phones? I would get that if I were you, and you're interested in getting lots of updates and development. That'll be my next phone if Sprint doesn't wait 6 months after release to sell it.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They don't make all of the nexus line.. HTC had one early on. Google has just chosen to go with sammy lately
MemoryController said:
Samsung doesn't release sources quicker than HTC.
And Samsung thinks it's fun to brick our devices. Google emmc brick bug.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SIII source was available as soon as the phone was released.
Rxpert said:
SIII source was available as soon as the phone was released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source for the Epic 4G Touch was also released shortly before it got its ICS update. Samsung definitely knows how to please the community.
SoraX64 said:
We would get this if we had official support. We knew it wasn't coming for us.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who said we weren't getting official cm? The source was just released sooooooo
eao1991 said:
Source for the Epic 4G Touch was also released shortly before it got its ICS update. Samsung definitely knows how to please the community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless you take into account they're timely updates
-Cupper- said:
Who said we weren't getting official cm? The source was just released sooooooo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he just meant we should have known we weren't getting RC2 since we haven't obtained official support yet.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
guih said:
Unless you take into account they're timely updates
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung does update quick. Ignoring the wider user base of GSM carriers, CDMA carriers such as VZW and Sprint always tend to lag behind updates. Due to CDMA restrictions that can't be open-sourced, Samsung doesn't control the entire software update and adds to the delay. Take a look at devices that were released with Gingerbread and see how many of those have ICS. Chances are they're almost all GSM devices.The HTC Rezound on Verizon came out later than the Epic 4G Touch and has yet to see ICS. The Evo 3D and Design 4G won't see ICS till next month. Besides, the Epic 4G Touch was receiving ICS leaks since early this year.
-Cupper- said:
Who said we weren't getting official cm? The source was just released sooooooo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one said that. But we DON'T as of now so of course we didn't get the update.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium

Categories

Resources