So i have cm7 installed on my NT and the performance is just fine. But i heard that overclocking can increase performance and battery life. I dont really care all that much about performance but battery life is really essesntial to me and i wanna max it out. So as an OC'ing newb i would like to hear from you guys what the easiest way to OC is and what a safe OCing speed is once i know how. Id like a speed thats very stable yet still yields up the benefits. Thanks for all the help you guys
These forums truely are amazing
-Silente
Sent from my CM7 Nook Tablet
Well first of all, we would need the proper kernels in the system folders for it work in the first place (which isn't). From what I have read in the Android Dev thread, they are working on it and the would post instructions and details when the time comes.
myl0h said:
Well first of all, we would need the proper kernels in the system folders for it work in the first place (which isn't). From what I have read in the Android Dev thread, they are working on it and the would post instructions and details when the time comes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'll look forward to that
Sent from my CM7 Nook Tablet
SilentStormer said:
So i have cm7 installed on my NT and the performance is just fine. But i heard that overclocking can increase performance and battery life. I dont really care all that much about performance but battery life is really essesntial to me and i wanna max it out. So as an OC'ing newb i would like to hear from you guys what the easiest way to OC is and what a safe OCing speed is once i know how. Id like a speed thats very stable yet still yields up the benefits. Thanks for all the help you guys
These forums truely are amazing
-Silente
Sent from my CM7 Nook Tablet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OCing will not increase battery life. In fact, it'll do the opposite, decrease your battery life. I haven't read this anywhere, but that just has to be the case. It's like saying the driving 100 miles uses less gas then driving 30 miles.
theartofbone said:
OCing will not increase battery life. In fact, it'll do the opposite, decrease your battery life. I haven't read this anywhere, but that just has to be the case. It's like saying the driving 100 miles uses less gas then driving 30 miles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that the OP is refering more to Underclocking to get more out of his battery life. I cannot comment when the dev team will release this yet.
yea overclocking with an on demand profile should yield better battery life although the kernels probably already has built in settings for screen off and such?
Sent from my sensation 4G
nba1341 said:
yea overclocking with an on demand profile should yield better battery life although the kernels probably already has built in settings for screen off and such?
Sent from my sensation 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yah but you can never have long enough battery life!
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
I too am looking forward to when we can play with OCing this wonderful hardware. I sure the devs will get to it eventually. First we must get a 3.x kernel developed and then ICS/CM9. Once this happens I'm sure there will be plenty of tweaks/scripts to play with not to derail but is it possible(and safe) to play around with build.prop and init.d? I am currently running CM7 Alpha12.
nerdyjim said:
I too am looking forward to when we can play with OCing this wonderful hardware. I sure the devs will get to it eventually. First we must get a 3.x kernel developed and then ICS/CM9. Once this happens I'm sure there will be plenty of tweaks/scripts to play with not to derail but is it possible(and safe) to play around with build.prop and init.d? I am currently running CM7 Alpha12.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, It´s time to start OC in NT, for Kindle Fire there are a lot of OC kernels, Not the same for the NT.
Team-B does indeed have an OC in progress. It is in testing now. So far it seems to run very stable at 1188 Mhz (that is the version I am currently testing, altho Goncezilla has ran his to 1250 Mhz stable I believe)
Know-Fear said:
Team-B does indeed have an OC in progress. It is in testing now. So far it seems to run very stable at 1188 Mhz (that is the version I am currently testing, altho Goncezilla has ran his to 1250 Mhz stable I believe)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As OP states i am indeed a noob. If i overclock a device will i save battery or burn it faster?
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
SilentStormer said:
As OP states i am indeed a noob. If i overclock a device will i save battery or burn it faster?
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking by itself will typically decrease battery life. Undervolting, on the other hand, has great potential to increase battery life, even when combined with overclocking.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
ckevinwelch said:
Overclocking by itself will typically decrease battery life. Undervolting, on the other hand, has great potential to increase battery life, even when combined with overclocking.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. Whats undervolting?
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Running the processor on a lower voltage than stock. Many chips may be able to run just fine using less power.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using Tapatalk
Related
Here
After last weeks DX farce with 2Ghz and 3Ghz Im cautious however these guys seem to have the benchies to back it up. We've long heard the potential for the hummingbird was 1.6. Only sad part is they say no Fascinate development till they get one. Removing the 56fps cap is nice too
I've never heard of these guys before? Legit? Renowned? Anyone know.
I would say all is BS until proven other wise. In my opinion the hardware would burn up at those speeds.
achandler2 said:
I would say all is BS until proven other wise. In my opinion the hardware would burn up at those speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While not safe, I seriously doubt it would burn up.
adrynalyne said:
While not safe, I seriously doubt it would burn up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. 1.6 has long been discussed as an achieveable speed. Dirrk was tinkering with it weeks ago. Its voltage requirement obviously is high and near the threshold point given the non-active cooling for the cpu. But I would not be surprised this could be achieved. I mean shoot we have 1.25Ghz on less than stock voltage already.
Benchmarks in one hand, stability in the other. When I see a posted kernel with good reviews for a week or so, I'll do more than raise an eyebrow. lol.
It's on the OCLF kernel, which if I remember, is well known for posting high quadrant scores without giving any real performance benefit.
Also, benchmark overclock's in the desktop world are always just for demonstration, not an application. Ever seen that 7GHz overclock benchmark they did on a Pentium 4?
This is no BS. The devs working on this are reputable and put out some of the best Vibrant ROMs out there. They're stable at 1.6ghz and are talking about pushing it to 1.8/2.0.
Kubernetes said:
This is no BS. The devs working on this are reputable and put out some of the best Vibrant ROMs out there. They're stable at 1.6ghz and are talking about pushing it to 1.8/2.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This doesn't suprise me. I could push my Droid to 1.32ghz. That's well over a 100% overclock. Achieving a 60% overclock shouldn't be too hard, especially on newer and much better hardware.
I find it tough to believe that most phones will be stable at a 60% overclock. Granted, Im only speaking from my experience with desktop CPUs... What type of software do people run to test stability?
Kubernetes said:
This is no BS. The devs working on this are reputable and put out some of the best Vibrant ROMs out there. They're stable at 1.6ghz and are talking about pushing it to 1.8/2.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats encouraging
Smeed said:
I find it tough to believe that most phones will be stable at a 60% overclock. Granted, Im only speaking from my experience with desktop CPUs... What type of software do people run to test stability?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What has been your experience with desktop cpu's. I cannot remember the last desktop cpu I have which at least 50% so I dont find 60% outrageously unreasonable. Active cooling obviously makes a difference.
With the battery life Im seeing on Dirrks UV kernels and even what I got on stock voltages pre-OC I would feel confident I could still get a full day off a 1.4-1.5Ghz hummingbird even if the voltage had to be raised to 1400mv.
I'm having trouble with stability with the 1.2 OC kernals...
So I checked out the thread in the vibrant section. This is def for real! Looks awesome! I had trouble with dirrks lv 1200. But every other kernel has ran fine. I'm sure that eventually we'll have everything we can dream on this phone. Good thing its already so great that I don't mind waiting. I hope I don't have to find an excuse to exchange my phone in search of one that can handle more.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
saps said:
Here
After last weeks DX farce with 2Ghz and 3Ghz Im cautious however these guys seem to have the benchies to back it up. We've long heard the potential for the hummingbird was 1.6. Only sad part is they say no Fascinate development till they get one. Removing the 56fps cap is nice too
I've never heard of these guys before? Legit? Renowned? Anyone know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@teamwhiskey is a god send. they have pulled the download though,due to flaws in their kernal. they are in the process of re-vamping it and re-testing. it seems while the kernal did improve performance it is unknown how much because it was also manipulating the internal clock speed.
def legit.
jeremyritzmann said:
@teamwhiskey is a god send. they have pulled the download though,due to flaws in their kernal. they are in the process of re-vamping it and re-testing. it seems while the kernal did improve performance it is unknown how much because it was also manipulating the internal clock speed.
def legit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds like what Dirrk ran into at 1.6 as well
Sent from my 1.2Ghz voodoo fascinate
saps said:
That sounds like what Dirrk ran into at 1.6 as well
Sent from my 1.2Ghz voodoo fascinate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea its going to be a pain to get that kink worked out. But from what ive heard theyre making headway. Now if only I could get a.perm root for the g2 lol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yes this is for real. I personally run it. Heres quadrant I ran last night. This kernel should be ported to all SGS phones. As long as they get a good dev with this phone to help port.
CPU didnt see near the gain I had hoped it would.
ya the CPU is getting destroyed by the N1. And what is with the ridiculous I/O. Did someone port a PCI express array of SSD's on the Vibrant? Maybe they just developed the GOD file system.
I make jokes, but I want the screen of my Fascinate to say 3439 also haha
I am on a mesmerize niw coming from a vibrant. I used this kernel. There was a timing issue. The io scores come from oclf which cheats quadrant. Those guys have released a pretty stable 1.4 oc that is real. I got 68 fps in neocore. Truth be told guys there is no need for oc in my opinion. With froyo the phone plays flash easily. Only application of oc to me is emulation and bragging rights. A good voodoo kernel works wonders honestly.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
wooow way to bring this one back from the dead
Right now the jump between 1ghz to 1.1ghz shows no real world benefit. I have a couple of questions:
1. Does overclocking to 1.1ghz effect the battery enought to see a difference?
2. Does undervolting save battery enough to see a difference?
3. If i have a custom kernal but still running at 1ghz, will the battery be the same/worse/better then runnning 1ghz on stock kernel
4. Does undervolting have any negative effects on performance
Thanks in Advance!! XDA RULES!!
The best type of experience, is 1st hand.
Why not try it out and make this thread a log of your results?
1username4thisforum said:
The best type of experience, is 1st hand.
Why not try it out and make this thread a log of your results?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to be rude, but does not answer my question. Why go through the procedure when someone who has already done it or has experience with it is kind enough to post answers.
primeboss said:
Right now the jump between 1ghz to 1.1ghz shows no real world benefit. I have a couple of questions:
1. Does overclocking to 1.1ghz effect the battery enought to see a difference?
2. Does undervolting save battery enough to see a difference?
3. If i have a custom kernal but still running at 1ghz, will the battery be the same/worse/better then runnning 1ghz on stock kernel
4. Does undervolting have any negative effects on performance
Thanks in Advance!! XDA RULES!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 Yes it does, but the phone only uses that frequency when pushed to limits, so not much.
2 Yes, i believe it does.
3 I found faux kernel to drink my battery like water even oj stock clock. Edgan's didnt have that problem.
4 it may cause random reboots if ur UV lvls are beyond the phone's capabilities.
Ps1: hes got a point, all impressions are too personal, they dont translate to universal experience.
Ps2: the greatest use of OC on the atrix right now is the webtop, that really pushes all possible processing power.
Sent from my PocketDock
Viamonte said:
1 Yes it does, but the phone only uses that frequency when pushed to limits, so not much.
2 Yes, i believe it does.
3 I found faux kernel to drink my battery like water even oj stock clock. Edgan's didnt have that problem.
4 it may cause random reboots if ur UV lvls are beyond the phone's capabilities.
Ps1: hes got a point, all impressions are too personal, they dont translate to universal experience.
Ps2: the greatest use of OC on the atrix right now is the webtop, that really pushes all possible processing power.
Sent from my PocketDock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You!
For the convenience of writing,Overclock shall be referred to as OC.
So,the Ace has started recieving OC kernels,which is a good thing but OC is dangerous too.I decided to make a thread and warn all users who don't know much and overclock.So,with this thread,I intend to educate all newbies about OCing before users start bricking their phone.
I shall write about overclocking,what overclocking does and then discuss abotut the various advantages and disadvantages it comes with
WHAT IS OVERCLOCKING?
Overclocking is the process of operating a computer component at a higher clock rate.In our case,the processor.Most people overclock their phones for perfomance but this so-called perfomance comes at a price which every user who oc should know about.So,I am going to discuss it
Android phones are clocked at a safe level when we buy it.However,we exceed this 'safe level' when oc it.
ADVANTAGES OF OVERCLOCKING:
1.Perfomance-OCing gives perfomance and thats what most people go after when they oc.
2.Cost-saving-Some people who have extensive knowledge about OCing do it to save money.For eg-Some people claim that they can get clock speeds upto 1GHz
when they oc.SGS has a clock speed of 1GHz(but when they overclock,they get better speeds I just put this one in so that people can have better knowledge)
DISADVANTAGES OF OVERCLOCKING:
1.Excess heat production-OCing produces more heat,nothing to be added
2.Lifespan decreases-By overclocking to extreme levels,you are actually killing your phone.Because of the excess heat generated,some interior parts may get damages.
3.Damage to GPU-Because of the heat generated(i think)
4.Excess Battery consumption-Because of the intense heat generated and the unusual number of charge cycles,battery consumption becomes high.As you might already know,Ace's battery is really suckish.With OC,its going to be even worse.
5.Permanent effects-If you were having weird effects when you OCed for a long time,you are not going to feel much better when you right-clock again
6.Instability-Stability levels of various phones vary Some get OC speeds near 1GHz while others are having trouble getting over 900MHz
7.FCs,Reboots and other errors-You have a chance of getting constant reboots and FCs when you OC,it depends.Some have even complainde of their touchscreen having complains when they switch to OC kernel
FINAL WORDS:
IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING,DON'T DO IT
OCing experiences/Suggestions:
Valakas:
Im used to OCing almost all the PC's i had, and my SGA wasnt an exception but sadly i didnt notice any huge improvement in the performance or in the lags i had in some huge games.
OC is a good way of wasting battery life and perhaps burn your phone. i wouldnt advise anybody to do it because its just not worthy.
P4qui7o:
I better get a new and stronger phone instead doing this !
Anyway you're phone is gonna "howl" some day after OC, and if you don't have money to buy another one, you've better keep it at 800Hz, stock ... my opinion
Yukinok25:
I have been OC's my HTC HERO since I bought it (2009), it's an old ARMv6 525mhz, which I pushed to 710mhz/MAX.
I NEVER had any issue for my OC's, I obviously can say that it becames maybe slightly warmer than the stock clock but nothing near hot.
Thanks to this, my Hero is running all the lastest rom with no lag for this two years, and so the other people in the Hero forum (basically 90% of the people OC's).
I am agree with the opener that OC's could be dangerous and it might decrease the lifespan of your device, but I also think it depends on the hardware, and I am not agree when I just read is "not" useful, because it DOES give a huge boost to your device.
Besides you can undervolting your CPU when your smartphone is in Idle (my MIN is 19 mhz), so the heat won't be generated anymore, you will save battery life, and the paradox... you will extend the life cicle of your CPU.
Also keep in mind that developers are improving the OC's working on new governors and kernels all the time.
There are risks also when we flash a rom or a new radio version, but that doesn't mean they are not useful. We flash them because we want to enhance our devices
Pardon me,if there are any mistakes,technical or grammatical,if i have missed anything.
Thanx to Wikipedia,PujitJuneja and Google
P.S. I didn't copy-paste it from anywhere,wrote it all down.So,a click on the thanks button will be greatly appreciated
Cheers
I think this was a good piece to explain risks and rewards of OCing.
All d noobies should take a look at this.
Sent from Galaxy Ace GT-S5830 using Grif's Cyanogenmod & allinone ram script.
Dont jus say thanks, use d 'THANKS' button. [XDA RULE]
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
EmoBoiix3 said:
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Empty Reply?
Anyways, this is an awesome thread for people who don't know a lot about Overclocking
EmoBoiix3 said:
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats that supposed to be,empty post?
pujitjuneja said:
Empty Reply?
Anyways, this is an awesome thread for people who don't know a lot about Overclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldnt have done it without you
I better get a new and stronger phone instead doing this !
Anyway you're phone is gonna "howl" some day after OC, and if you don't have money to buy another one, you've better keep it at 800Hz, stock ... my opinion
Prawesome said:
Couldnt have done it without you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe, always happy to help (Well only for some people )
Thank for ur info
devilsking said:
Thank for ur info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anytime
Well done
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Great work!
And to add to this maybe..
The battery will get effed up pretty soon coz of the rapid discharging and the more than usual number of charge cycles and also the heat
Im used to OC almost all the PC's i had, and my SGA wouldnt be the exception to that rule. But sadly i didnt notice any huge improve in the performance or in the lags i had in some huge games.
OC is a good way of wasting battery life and perhaps burn your phone. i wouldnt advise anybody to do it because its just not worthy.
Thanx for the suggestion guyz...Will add them
Without cooler (radiator) OC on SGA its a danger experiment-be care full. Sorry for my weak English.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Thanks for the useful info here ....
GT5830 said:
Thanks for the useful info here ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anytime
PafcioPjay said:
Without cooler (radiator) OC on SGA its a danger experiment-be care full. Sorry for my weak English.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its already written-heating effect
ive tried every rom/kernal combination and with each i get lock ups when doing intensive cpu work such as a game or benchmark overclocked to 1.6 any ideas? Thanks
Just means your processor was built a little weak. Its only built to run at 1.2ghz so anything above that is pushing it hard... some phones can be oc'd that much, some can't. Just take it down to 1.4. I can't even get mine to 1.4 so he thankful
Sent from my AT&T cellular device.
What voltage do you have it at? Try raising it 25mV at a time stressing you cpu at each step until you're stable. That is if you are determined to run 1.6 and i would not push more than +100mV personally.
joeyzadoe said:
ive tried every rom/kernal combination and with each i get lock ups when doing intensive cpu work such as a game or benchmark overclocked to 1.6 any ideas? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you considered there is a reason that your phone was only sold as capable of 1.2 GHz?
Entropy512 said:
Have you considered there is a reason that your phone was only sold as capable of 1.2 GHz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow... You got real issues man..The OP is just looking for some tips from others that have succeeded in getting their phones to 1.6.. You need some help buddy...
If youve nothing nice to say..
But then I guess youd never speak would you?
/end rant
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Stevenrogers_420 said:
If youve nothing nice to say..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope you heed your own advice.
Stevenrogers_420 said:
Wow... You got real issues man..The OP is just looking for some tips from others that have succeeded in getting their phones to 1.6.. You need some help buddy...
If youve nothing nice to say..
But then I guess youd never speak would you?
/end rant
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not think entropy is the one who has issues...
This has been discussed in 10 different threads already and in great detail. If the OP did as much as search he would of have found the answer himself. That is why they call it research
the only question left is...... You mad bro?
Keep all voltages stock, then use voltage congrol and click on 1400 and increment the slider+ 25, then do the same for 1600. This is what i had to do to get my phone stable at 1.6 Some phones may need EXTRA voltage and others need less. It takes some testing to get your particular phone stable at anything over 1.2Ghz. I only did it to see if I saw any gains. Actually for me and my phone I found as far as MY SETUP and testing many different benchmark style apps at 1.4Ghz i got better benchmarks than i did at 1.6Ghz. Now everyones phones will act sligbtly different so your mileage may vary.
Sent From My KickAss ATT SGS2 SPORTING CM7
At 1.6 ghz... your phone will be discharging your battery ON your charger... I personally wouldn't recommend doing it as it gets the phone really hot, and causes the chip lots of stress due to high heat. Personally if you need more performance (this phones pretty damn fast anyways) go to 1.4ghz.
Most of our phones can be overclocked to 1.4 and some can go to 1.6 but not all. If you change the voltages and it still craps out, then take it down a notch to 1.4 and see how that works for you.
Entropy512 said:
Have you considered there is a reason that your phone was only sold as capable of 1.2 GHz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now now. Since when do we encourage keeping things stock.
My point is - if it were guaranteed to hit 1.6, it would be sold as 1.6.
Being able to hit 1.6 is luck of the draw, pure and simple.
There's a reason:
1) OC is not default on my kernel
2) I held off on providing OC support for a while here, and NEVER released it on Infuse (users weren't mature enough to handle it over there)
3) I have a warning in GIANT RED LETTERS not to complain about OC stability issues on my kernel thread.
Entropy512 said:
My point is - if it were guaranteed to hit 1.6, it would be sold as 1.6.
Being able to hit 1.6 is luck of the draw, pure and simple.
There's a reason:
1) OC is not default on my kernel
2) I held off on providing OC support for a while here, and NEVER released it on Infuse (users weren't mature enough to handle it over there)
3) I have a warning in GIANT RED LETTERS not to complain about OC stability issues on my kernel thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is all true... but the OP was simply asking a question now lets all play nice.
We should have an OC that allows n00bs to melt their cpu.... 2.5ghz ftw
No no no.... We have too many "I tried to load the ICS in the I9100 forums, and I bricked my phone, please help!" threads. we don't need "I OC'ed my phone to 8ghz and melted my cpu" threads too
Tegrak allows you to go past 1.6. I thought these CPU were locked @ 1.6 but i had to up my voltage at 1.7 and i got a small bump in my benches though i probably did run my test enough to confirm the bump. At so.e point, when i get some time ill beat on my CPU some more
penguinlogik said:
At 1.6 ghz... your phone will be discharging your battery ON your charger... I personally wouldn't recommend doing it as it gets the phone really hot, and causes the chip lots of stress due to high heat. Personally if you need more performance (this phones pretty damn fast anyways) go to 1.4ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran my phone at 1.6 for days just to see performance. No UV at all.. battery certainly drained faster, but not while charging. It charged just fine.. and stayed cool even when stressing. Like many have stated, all CPU's are slightly different .. just cause yours melts at 1.6 and wont charge doesn't mean this will happen for anyone trying to run 1.6GHz.
sent from my SGSII... suckas
Try bumpin' up the voltage 1-2 notches.
Just to add to the stats...
I've been able to run @ 1.4 with the same voltage as 1.2, but my phone will freeze once in a while when running apps like camera or navigation. Had to bump the voltage up slightly to get it stable, though I will likely just run 1.2.
I cannot run at 1.6.
fallingreason said:
Just to add to the stats...
I've been able to run @ 1.4 with the same voltage as 1.2, but my phone will freeze once in a while when running apps like camera or navigation. Had to bump the voltage up slightly to get it stable, though I will likely just run 1.2.
I cannot run at 1.6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try changing or updating your kernel. Im the OP and had the same problems. with the new siyah kernel at 1.6 even if i try i cant make it lock up or freeze.
Your processor was made from a different silicon wafer than other people's phones and was rated for 1.2ghz.
Since each wafer is different, some processors take voltage better than others as well as speed. It happens.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
What do you guys think is better smartassv2 or ondemand? I usually use smartassv2 but im not sure with the rezound.
I'm using ondemand and its been perfect for me. no rebooted and great battery life.
I flashed incredikernel 6 the day it was released weeks ago.
I use on-demand, I have not had a single reboot/bootloop etc yet & the battery life is super.
I use on demand with the stock Kernel (using cleanrom 3.5). I drop the cpu down to about 1.ghz and set a profile for on demand between 192 and 760 something when the screen is off. I only dropped about 3 percent a few nights ago while sleeping (6.5 hours roughly). (the phone doesn't go into sleep mode and I dont have a battery saver). I don't get that with my heavy usage, but that is a big plus.
Where do you guys get the download for ondemand? Back in the day when I had the OG Droid, everyone used SetCPU. Doesn't seem to be the app of choice any more to set frequencies. I can't find ondemand (or smartass for that matter) in the market. ANy suggestions?
I had been using ondemand up until a few days ago. The last couple days I have been using interactive, and it seems like both battery life and performance are somewhat better, although I have no hard numbers to support this, and I have really random usage.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
smartassv2 seems to be working well for me so far.
vcmstone said:
Where do you guys get the download for ondemand? Back in the day when I had the OG Droid, everyone used SetCPU. Doesn't seem to be the app of choice any more to set frequencies. I can't find ondemand (or smartass for that matter) in the market. ANy suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're features on the kernel. When you install the kernel you'll be able to check which one you wanna use from the app. (SetCPU may be good, but it seems the apps of choice on the Rezound are AnTuTu or Systems Tuner Pro, I use AnTuTU.)
Or if you use incredikernel the app incredicontrol goes along with it perfectly and is 100% totally stable for me. I have tried every kernel there is both GB and ICS on my phone and incredikernel and the stock kernel are the only ones that will run stability test scaling stability test all night long without bootlooping.
Volkaru said:
They're features on the kernel. When you install the kernel you'll be able to check which one you wanna use from the app. (SetCPU may be good, but it seems the apps of choice on the Rezound are AnTuTu or Systems Tuner Pro, I use AnTuTU.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much for the reply. I am just sticking with the stock Kernal for now, but I was interested in undervolting the kernal while it's in sleep mode and while charging to see if I can save battery life. I just tried SetCPU, but was not pleased with the constant SU pop ups. It was keeping my screen awake. I think I'll five AnTuTu a shot.
If I ever load a custom kernal, I'll know what to keep an eye out for.
I have completely given up on undervolting at this point, I never once saw a noticeable increase in battery life but I definitely ended up with a less stable phone.........
jmorton10 said:
I have completely given up on undervolting at this point, I never once saw a noticeable increase in battery life but I definitely ended up with a less stable phone.........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What we need are more custom kernels.
I have undervolted (Incredikernel with Incredicontrol) and it's quite stable and the battery life is pretty good. I can get 12 - 16 hours with the stock battery with medium usage (texting, browsing).
Interstingly, it was 10 - 12 with OnDemand. Interactive seems to be better.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
LunaticSerenade said:
I have undervolted (Incredikernel with Incredicontrol) and it's quite stable and the battery life is pretty good. I can get 12 - 16 hours with the stock battery with medium usage (texting, browsing).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever tried leaving all the settings exactly the same and NOT undervolting??
I would be willing to bet the battery life would be almost identical.
CPU Tuner is awesome also. Might be the best.
----------------
"The views in this post do not necessarily represent those by me or the writer, and are not my own." ----------------
Sent from HTC Rezound with Tapatalk
jmorton10 said:
Have you ever tried leaving all the settings exactly the same and NOT undervolting??
I would be willing to bet the battery life would be almost identical.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, yes. It did make a difference. Not as significant as on the Incredible, although that may be a difference in HAVS vs SVS.
But what works for one may not work for all.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
im hoping IMO ends up making a kernel for us. i know he makes them for the thunderbolt.
I'm pretty content with Inredikernel. I'm sure Chad is going to hit us with something awesome soon.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
LunaticSerenade said:
I'm pretty content with Inredikernel. I'm sure Chad is going to hit us with something awesome soon.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The more options the better though.
mighty_markus12 said:
The more options the better though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well played sir. /bow
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA