AOSP style. Let me hear your requests. Make them known lol.! What would you want in a rom.? Please add what phone you are using.!
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
simplicity, fast, just more of a different design rather then the same android kind of look we are use to
Android311 said:
simplicity, fast, just more of a different design rather then the same android kind of look we are use to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for input
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
No prob, what do you want in a rom?
Sent from my NookColor using xda premium
Same as u. I have plans though
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
how can i backup drivers for gps, wireless.. from my stock rom and install them to different custom rom?
seljachina said:
how can i backup drivers for gps, wireless.. from my stock rom and install them to different custom rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Explain a little more pls
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Sence 3.0+ is almost perfect
Just power menu screenshots, Fasterfix and Adfree makes it perfect. Leedroid does a pretty good job at making the last 2 happen
something different really...all android os have the same layout pretty much and I would like to see more voice command. example: you tell the phone what you want to do and it will be done. you control the whole phone with your voice instead of your fingers, phone does all the work while you tell it what to do.
I loved the Samsung Galaxy S on 2.2... The functions such as media buttons in the lock screen and drag down menu... as well as the wifi, bt, etc built into the drag down menu. And it was always quick for me.. No lag..
But it needs to be custom, the ability to easily run back to your stock rom, and then back to the custom rom on start up? Such as a computer when you run windows then ubuntu?
Just my thoughs.....
ognimnella said:
Same as u. I have plans though
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you planing on making developing a rom?
Android311 said:
Are you planing on making developing a rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I'm riding solo right now, so it will take a while to make. But I am building from source and completely revamping GB 2.3, I am going to make my own music player, gallery, merge the messaging, dialer and contacts (similar to goSMS) for smoother functionality, and a lot of other features, I plan on a few major releases, and get ppl to port it to their phones. All will come in due time though.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
wow thats pretty cool what phone is it going to be ported on?
Question
Will it base on stock or CM?
Android311 said:
wow thats pretty cool what phone is it going to be ported on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm I want it to reach every phone that can run gingerbread but for now the first releases will hit the nexus S, EVO 3d and sensation.
paravoz.98 said:
Will it base on stock or CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ummm the FIRST release will be a CM base but I will be working on a stock build so that I can add everything I want without having to dig through CM's source code and plug in my stuff. But this is a release that really wont see the light of day until the summer, the CM one will maybe be sooner but ACT testing is coming soon aaannnd school takes priority as always.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Related
Is anybody working on an AOSP ROM?
I would myself, but my pc is almost dead, so I don't have the ability to. Thanks to whoever is!
Sent from my HTC Rezound using xda premium
I would assume someone is. Why is your pc almost dead?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
con247 said:
I would assume someone is. Why is your pc almost dead?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a laptop that I bought in August 2005. The Vertical lines/stripes of death, a whole 3 inch column of my screen is just black now. It's just dying a slow and horrible death. I might be getting another one this month or sometime soon!
i am trying to get cm7 running on mine with some minor success so far... but its my first attempt and so far very little works...
We really need to start asking questions in the proper section. The development section is for ROM's, MOD's and other development resources.
As for your answer, there are a few working on aosp builds. It just takes time.
lllboredlll said:
We really need to start asking questions in the proper section. The development section is for ROM's, MOD's and other development resources.
As for your answer, there are a few working on aosp builds. It just takes time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the appropriate section for this?
MisfitsTimmy said:
What is the appropriate section for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
general, not in the dev section.
Aosp gb or ics?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
+1 for AOSP. GB or ICS.
I would assume ICS because at this point nobody wants GB and the ICS source is out.
Im hoping someone good enough decided to tackle the Miui port.
a.mcdear said:
i am trying to get cm7 running on mine with some minor success so far... but its my first attempt and so far very little works...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What CM7 are you using???????
dragonrazorz said:
Aosp gb or ics?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't care. I just want AOSP or as close as possible! CM7 would give me a stiffy right now, lol!
Hahaha thats funny
+1
MisfitsTimmy said:
I don't care. I just want AOSP or as close as possible! CM7 would give me a stiffy right now, lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Yeah, if CM7 could be easily ported to the Rezound, I'd definitely take that for now.
It bugs me how opening the dial pad blocks the speakerphone toggle on the call screen. It also does this on the iPhone. AOSP Android just covers the picture with the dialpad when needed.
At least on the Rezound it's easy to quickly hide the dialpad again. iPhone 4S toggling is kind of slow. At least on my friend's.
If I knew anything about porting roms I would try. I even have a dual xeon workstation to use for it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
rockingondrums said:
Yeah, if CM7 could be easily ported to the Rezound, I'd definitely take that for now.
It bugs me how opening the dial pad blocks the speakerphone toggle on the call screen. It also does this on the iPhone. AOSP Android just covers the picture with the dialpad when needed.
At least on the Rezound it's easy to quickly hide the dialpad again. iPhone 4S toggling is kind of slow. At least on my friend's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, but the aosp dialer doesn't have smart dialer options built in...
bad4u6669 said:
Im hoping someone good enough decided to tackle the Miui port.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
droidvicious (@Paullie_Vicious on twitter) is taking up miui on the rezound. he also got miui working on the tbolt, has almost fully functional builds for the lte and gsm gnexus, and is starting to work on the sgs2. So I would say he's pretty good
sonicxml said:
droidvicious (@Paullie_Vicious on twitter) is taking up miui on the rezound. he also got miui working on the tbolt, has almost fully functional builds for the lte and gsm gnexus, and is starting to work on the sgs2. So I would say he's pretty good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be awesome I loved Miui on my OG droid.
Id be very happy with a cm7 port.
who doesn't want an AOSP rom?
I also really don't care about an ICS release - though I'll happily take it, stock and rooted.
raduque said:
who doesn't want an AOSP rom?
I also really don't care about an ICS release - though I'll happily take it, stock and rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the ICS kernel is ready, you can flash the i9100 stock ICS rom.
I'll probably try it out at the very least. I think I'm addicted to flashing.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
estxxas said:
I'll probably try it out at the very least. I think I'm addicted to flashing.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I think I'm over the whole constantly flashing thing. I want my phone to just work.
raduque said:
who doesn't want an AOSP rom?
I also really don't care about an ICS release - though I'll happily take it, stock and rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just don't like thw TW launcher as much. It's good, don't get me wrong, but I wish it had more flexibility. TW 4.5 has some of those, but then it lacks some from the official TW3.
Other wise, I like some of the other additions by Samsung. Specially the changes in Clock and Contacts.
So now I am aiming for stock i9100 + Nova/Apex launcher
Wow... just...wow....how can you have Android phone, and just want a phone that just works? Just curious case my phone is my computer,TV. Dvr ....everything
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
You maybe the only one lol
If you want a phone that just works get a Startac...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
I like Samsung based over aosp based too. But development on both fronts helps make for an overall better experience for anyone who likes flashing and tinkering with there phone.
As far as tw launcher, it has gotten allot better, but no matter whether I run asop based or Samsung based I always seem to find my way to go launcher or adw.
Once ics is working well enough for me to keep it on my phone longer than a day or two, I'm going to spend some time checking out the nova launcher.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
I love aosp roms. Guess this thread isn't for me :-(
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
raduque said:
who doesn't want an AOSP rom?
I also really don't care about an ICS release - though I'll happily take it, stock and rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I partially agree. I don't really care about ICS, but I'll probably update to it when it comes out. I am perfectly happy with the setup I have now. I dont't understand why people are acting like they "need" it.
I also like AOSP and its simplicity, but I love the media format support provided by Samsung roms. Full 1080p wmv's @ 10mbps? Yes please. I don't care for Touchwiz launcher itself though.
And I can't live without allshare
I might be crazy but if a rom has it removed on install I will instantly flash another rom with it.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I find you need a balance between constantly flashing and having a functional device.
For me it goes in spurts.
kamots said:
Wow... just...wow....how can you have Android phone, and just want a phone that just works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can you have an Android phone, or any device really, that DOESN'T just work? You like having something that's constantly broken?
Just curious case my phone is my computer,TV. Dvr ....everything
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone is a communication device primarily, a personal organizer and music source for my truck, and sometimes light gaming device.
It'll never replace my desktop, and it'll never replace my HTPC + 55" Samsung LED SmartTV. I just can't stand watching video on such a small screen.
eep2378 said:
You maybe the only one lol
If you want a phone that just works get a Startac...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like all the advanced things my phone can do, I just want every feature to always work, 100% of the time.
raduque said:
How can you have an Android phone, or any device really, that DOESN'T just work? You like having something that's constantly broken?
My phone is a communication device primarily, a personal organizer and music source for my truck, and sometimes light gaming device.
It'll never replace my desktop, and it'll never replace my HTPC + 55" Samsung LED SmartTV. I just can't stand watching video on such a small screen.
I like all the advanced things my phone can do, I just want every feature to always work, 100% of the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.) Flashing ROMs doesn't mean one's device doesn't work. It simply means they want a change from stock/whatever they decide to change from.
2.) Flashing ROMs doesn't disable your device as a communication platform. AOSP based ROMs (With ICS, at least) have a better calendar, camera application, and are compatible with virtually every app you currently have now.
3.) Not trying to sound like a ****, but if you just want it to work and aren't concerned with flashing the ROM or anything, why are you on XDA Developers?
I hate it, is fugly,, I love touchwiz
eortizr said:
I hate it, is fugly,, I love touchwiz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the first time I've ever head of anyone liking the look of TouchWiz over the Holo theme for ICS...
Hey now. TWlauncher grew on me too. When I got my new phone launcherpro didn't make it back on.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777
eortizr said:
I hate it, is fugly,, I love touchwiz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
absolutely agree 100%
I want ics with ics colors, ics lock, ics wallpapers, rings and sounds that don't list twice, and functional camera. no one can fix music quality so forget that. I don't think I'm asking much but some disagree.
brent8577 said:
I want ics with ics colors, ics lock, ics wallpapers, rings and sounds that don't list twice, and functional camera. no one can fix music quality so forget that. I don't think I'm asking much but some disagree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't stop do you? These devs work for FREE and they work as hard as they can, not everything is easy to fix just be patient and stop disrespecting the devs
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I know it is very early.....but I was who seeing whether it was possible to port jellybean on HP touchpad via SDK....devs at Acer A500 have done it...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
I know it is very early.....but I was who seeing whether it was possible to port jellybean on HP touchpad via SDK....devs at Acer A500 have done it...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is possible... theres somebody on the evo 3D doing it, same chipset so its not a far fetched idea.....whether we get a working version, who knows, we'll have to wait for the cm team like last time and they never do things without source, and if anybody wants to port it via SDK, good luck i guess cuz i dont think anybody tried SDK ports for ICS on the touchpad
ace9988 said:
it is possible... theres somebody on the evo 3D doing it, same chipset so its not a far fetched idea.....whether we get a working version, who knows, we'll have to wait for the cm team like last time and they never do things without source, and if anybody wants to port it via SDK, good luck i guess cuz i dont think anybody tried SDK ports for ICS on the touchpad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And since Jelly Bean is just like a small step from ICS.... It shouldn't be that hard.... Only project butter stands in our way...
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
I know it is very early.....but I was who seeing whether it was possible to port jellybean on HP touchpad via SDK....devs at Acer A500 have done it...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They use unmodified cm9 kernel
So we just need someone to compile the sdk
Sent from my HTC PucciniLte using XDA Premium HD app
sahhar1993 said:
They use unmodified cm9 kernel
So we just need someone to compile the sdk
Sent from my HTC PucciniLte using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We could contact the cm team but I guess they would not build the sdk one....so we will need to contact other devs
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
And since Jelly Bean is just like a small step from ICS.... It shouldn't be that hard.... Only project butter stands in our way...
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't be saying things down that road lol...you'll get alot of backlash like the e3d forums.....froyo to gingerbread wasn't a huge step but it took people a very long time. Lets just wait for source to be out next month it isnt a very long time. Then since the base framework is similar, it won't take that much longer then it should. I'm more interested in the PDK feature which gives basic source codes for the hardware side of things, exciting times
ace9988 said:
don't be saying things down that road lol...you'll get alot of backlash like the e3d forums.....froyo to gingerbread wasn't a huge step but it took people a very long time. Lets just wait for source to be out next month it isnt a very long time. Then since the base framework is similar, it won't take that much longer then it should. I'm more interested in the PDK feature which gives basic source codes for the hardware side of things, exciting times
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U don't understand small step...the base is the same...the framework has been tweaked and the system has been made more fluid due to project butter so.....it should not be took hard to port from the sdk
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
U don't understand small step...the base is the same...the framework has been tweaked and the system has been made more fluid due to project butter so.....it should not be took hard to port from the sdk
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting anything from the SDK has always been horrible, its not that easy and even if it were that isn't to say it'll be any good.
Remember those SDK ports of Honeycomb...horrendous. There's a reason nobody bothered with an SDK port of ICS for the Touchpad...there terrible.
I'm fine with just waiting until source code is ready. Unlike the switch from GB to ICS on a tablet which was huge, JB isn't really groundbreaking. It has some nice new features but after playing around in the SDK for a while I didn't really see anything that I couldn't wait a few months for.
vipaman said:
U don't understand small step...the base is the same...the framework has been tweaked and the system has been made more fluid due to project butter so.....it should not be took hard to port from the sdk
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand it perfectly......it is a small step yes, but in the grand scheme of things when you get an SDK port, when has it always worked perfectly?? If we're testing proof of concept here i can understand but you people want jelly bean to use straight away and to tinker with it. Devs I think have lives and if someone wanted to do it, they would've done it by now cuz its already being booted (albeit black screen) on the one x. Instead of the frustration of porting something using SDK they'd rather wait for source, because then people will start complaining that "this doesn't work, that doesn't work" so on and so forth
Anyone else think it's weird how they went back to the phone layout for the nexus 7? Will it be that way on larger tablets? I'm not a huge fan of how notifications work on my touchpad but the controls may be hard to reach if they go with a phone layout.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'd like to mess with SDK port. If a dev would do it. The port for one x has already been updated. They are really going at it...even if they know it wont ever fully work. Maybe they are just getting head start on development.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda app-developers app
its a waste of time. why would any dev spend their time on it,just to have to start over when the real source
comes out.
Why don't you ask the one x dev working on SDK port why he is deving it? Jb source will be out in 2 weeks.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda app-developers app
People do it because they want to. Why should that affect others?
Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2
T-Keith said:
Anyone else think it's weird how they went back to the phone layout for the nexus 7? Will it be that way on larger tablets? I'm not a huge fan of how notifications work on my touchpad but the controls may be hard to reach if they go with a phone layout.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
while the current tablet ui layout is mostly functional, its not very pretty and a bit disjointed when coming from a phone version of android. it also doesnt allow manufacturers to put physical buttons on a tablet without them being redundant, and is called fragmented when compared to the ios on the iphone to ipad. it wouldnt surprise me if they went with this design as their new tablet layout. and it probably wouldnt be as bad as you think. with future cm9 or aokp customizations, youll probably be able to adjust the positions of the nav bar however you want.
The Jack of Clubs said:
while the current tablet ui layout is mostly functional, its not very pretty and a bit disjointed when coming from a phone version of android. it also doesnt allow manufacturers to put physical buttons on a tablet without them being redundant, and is called fragmented when compared to the ios on the iphone to ipad. it wouldnt surprise me if they went with this design as their new tablet layout. and it probably wouldnt be as bad as you think. with future cm9 or aokp customizations, youll probably be able to adjust the positions of the nav bar however you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've long thought that the tablet UI for large tablets makes a lot of sense as if straddles the ground between desktop and phone quite nicely. Google aren't making the Nexus 7 UI default for these tablets either, if you emulate a touchpad withe the sdk then you get the UI we have now. On my small A100 the layout is pretty poor, and of course the resolution isn't all that great either but it's so crowded. The Nexus 7 UI works out nicely for smaller screens I think
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Yeah I tried a Galaxy tab 7 at the store yesterday and the ics tablet mode is a little tight. Maybe it wouldn't be a bad thing for a 7" tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Does that mean that all the work that has been done so far to get a working camera and microphone on ICS for the TP will go to waste with a new firmware?
kalala said:
Does that mean that all the work that has been done so far to get a working camera and microphone on ICS for the TP will go to waste with a new firmware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it shouldn't be a waste. ICS is 4.0.x, JB is 4.1.x and is a refined ICS. So all the progress should be able to migrate over.
Sent from my AOKP Touchpad.
If we had a full source code, with WLAN drivers and all, would it be possible to create fully custom kernels and have functioning AOSP and other roms? The reason im asking is because ive never fully understood what is holding back development f custom roms/kernels. Thanks
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
eggydrums said:
If we had a full source code, with WLAN drivers and all, would it be possible to create fully custom kernels and have functioning AOSP and other roms? The reason im asking is because ive never fully understood what is holding back development f custom roms/kernels. Thanks
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes sir, then even devs that don't have the device can build for it, like the aokp team, etc.
Dark Nightmare said:
Yes sir, then even devs that don't have the device can build for it, like the aokp team, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for clarifiying to tell you more, i was almost at the edge of selling my amaze for a nexus, but i dont want to lose faith in htc that they will make it happen for us
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
eggydrums said:
Thanks for clarifiying to tell you more, i was almost at the edge of selling my amaze for a nexus, but i dont want to lose faith in htc that they will make it happen for us
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless you don't mind simple basic android, I think you should give it a bit more too, unlike the amaze, it's much harder for the nexus to get the pretty stuff other than AOSP android, amaze on the other hand would have the prettied sense version and once source is here, it's also gonna have alllll the aosp, aokp and what's not version to go along with it. So if you feel it's worth waiting a bit more to see if HTC comes through, I support you. :highfive:
Dark Nightmare said:
Unless you don't mind simple basic android, I think you should give it a bit more too, unlike the amaze, it's much harder for the nexus to get the pretty stuff other than AOSP android, amaze on the other hand would have the prettied sense version and once source is here, it's also gonna have alllll the aosp, aokp and what's not version to go along with it. So if you feel it's worth waiting a bit more to see if HTC comes through, I support you. :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ver the internet five: lololol thanks!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
eggydrums said:
Yeah ver the internet five: lololol thanks!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol better than being all solemn and boring.
Sent from my SGH-T679 using xda app-developers app
I'm currently on CM10.1 and love it, but what are the absolute best ROMs for this phone?
Pachonk said:
I'm currently on CM10.1 and love it, but what are the absolute best ROMs for this phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would need to define your criteria for "best" first.
For me, "best" ROMs are ROMs that give me better speed, more features, and similar stability to stock. I also keep my devices for a pretty long time. So as they age I look to the community for support in keeping up to date. Hell, I still have a Tegra 2 tablet (Gtab) and my old Hero C laying around.
In this respect, I have had very good luck with ViperROM on the LTE. YMMV
buymytoasters said:
You would need to define your criteria for "best" first.
For me, "best" ROMs are ROMs that give me better speed, more features, and similar stability to stock. I also keep my devices for a pretty long time. So as they age I look to the community for support in keeping up to date. Hell, I still have a Tegra 2 tablet (Gtab) and my old Hero C laying around.
In this respect, I have had very good luck with ViperROM on the LTE. YMMV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this is off topic but I have the Gtab too but sadly this happend... The touch screen doesn't work anymore but I still have it for the memory
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
If u like stock look but souped up! Go with Meanbean.. If u want to custimize then go with viper4g..
What is considered the best Rom?
Ask the fanboys...
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I like Viper4G but JB Tranquility and Operations Jelly Bean are good, as well.
Pachonk said:
I'm currently on CM10.1 and love it, but what are the absolute best ROMs for this phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to love aosp but I use viper now lol
Granted it's desensed and I use nova launcher
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
jesuscash said:
I used to love aosp but I use viper now lol
Granted it's desensed and I use nova launcher
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I use a cm10.1 like contact app? One that isn't htc sense contact?
Sent from my EVO using XDA Premium HD app
Pachonk said:
Can I use a cm10.1 like contact app? One that isn't htc sense contact?
Sent from my EVO using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe the apk has to be modded to work with sense. I tried restoring some aosp system apps on a sense rom and just got FCs. Clean ROM used to have a bunch of modded apks but I think it's been abandoned...haven't seen any out there for 4.1.2 yet.
Sent from my EVO LTE
premo15 said:
I believe the apk has to be modded to work with sense. I tried restoring some aosp system apps on a sense rom and just got FCs. Clean ROM used to have a bunch of modded apks but I think it's been abandoned...haven't seen any out there for 4.1.2 yet.
Sent from my EVO LTE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What makes them force close on different frameworks?
Sent from my EVO using XDA Premium HD app
Its more like what Rom is best for u.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
This is always going to be a question that never has the perfect answer. It depends on what you want/need. Go sense if you want the classic evo look and just want the basic experience its for people who don't care as much about making the device faster and better, they just want it to work and the only real reason they rooted it was to get rid of the bloatware. Keep it simple stupid. Honestly sense is fast, but aosp is is much more reliable and stable. Sense kernels have that small chance of corrupting your file system if and when your device crashes. It's a small chance but a chance none the less.
AOSP is by far the best for the ones who do want to unlock the devices full potential. AOSP (Android open source project) roms are more difficult to create and perfect but they give these devices more potential but its also up to the user to do his or her research. Don't flash or tweak even the slightest thing until you do your research and search xda and google. When you find a guide that of course isn't too old and you know you can trust it, read it over and over and bookmark it. Always search xda but never listen to the opinions of others until you test it yourself.
These rom creators work hard and they expect us to know what we are doing.
tl;dr - I will just say this, if your willing to spend more time to give you the best experience go AOSP. And if you go AOSP go CyanogenMod and nothing else. And for the kernel if you do wish to use a custom kernel I hightly recommend Komodo if you want an even better user experience.
Best rom is...
... the one that works best for you
FWIW. I love the ViperRom. Phone feels like it just "works" and, if I want, there are lots of customizations available.
That said, I just switched to HatkaLTE because I wanted to stay with a sense rom and it seems to me that the last update of ViperRom reintroduced the original rom's sensor problems on my phone. [I say seems because it's still not perfect, just better, on the HatkaLTE and maybe the hardware has developed a defect]. I can't say much about this rom yet because I haven't had it on my phone long enough and because I'm also playing around with different launchers at the same time.
Good luck!
1TonyC said:
I like Viper4G but JB Tranquility and Operations Jelly Bean are good, as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are these roms updated on 3.16?
Keyz450 said:
are these roms updated on 3.16?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ViperROM is. Operation Jelly Bean and Tranquility ROM are not.
Sent from my EVO 4G LTE using xda premium
Pachonk said:
What makes them force close on different frameworks?
Sent from my EVO using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Square peg, meet round hole.
I say decks cm10.1 or the sense5 port.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
IDK, but I'm really excited to install the new VIPERROM
Very, very excited. Hopefully it (re)fixes the proximity sensor problem, but if not, I have the init file all ready to solve the problem myself!
I have to agree with many of the posts, it's more of a personal taste question. I've run almost every ROM at some point, and I love the speed of AOSP, but like the features of Sense. There are a few key features that you lose on AOSP. After a whole lot of flashing, I've settled on SuperJelly Bareback, it strips out all the bloat of Sense while retaining those key features, and is almost spot on with the speed of AOSP. It's my happy medium. Good luck and happy flashing.
If you dont need Bluetooth, Sense 5. Otherwise Viper or Super LTE.