RootzWiki has broken news that they have a leaked official 4.0 for the ATT SGSII Skyrocket.
Interesting fact: build date is March 14.
Good news for us... I can only hope so. Just wanted to share this little tidbit with the SGSII world.
Article Link
yeah I seen that earlyer I wonder how much it will help us though...
sent from interspace on my hacked telly...
Doesn't help us, another useless thread is useless
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Nick281051 said:
Doesn't help us, another useless thread is useless
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. It Is of no use to us.
.
The skyrocket isn't anything like our I777. This doesn't help at all.
Nick281051 said:
Doesn't help us, another useless thread is useless
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Useless comment is useless.
Where did I say it would help?
Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS relm. Just a bit of interesting news, welcome to the GENERAL forum.
Don't hate just to hate.
just how I said a months ago, Skyrocket and Vivid are getting ICS before the i777, the source release helped but still not a fully functional.
eortizr said:
just how I said a months ago, Skyrocket and Vivid are getting ICS before the i777, the source release helped but still not a fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
everyone should have known the the ****rocket would get it before us. its an LTE device.
TheMistyMay said:
Useless comment is useless.
Where did I say it would help?
Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS relm. Just a bit of interesting news, welcome to the GENERAL forum.
Don't hate just to hate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody hates you, they and I just hate useless thread.
If the article said something about the ATT i777, then it is a good news, however, it's all about the i727. Absolutely have nothing to do with this forum.
"Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS realm"
Yes, we all know that.
votinh said:
"Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS realm"
Yes, we all know that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perfect! Relevance achieved, uselessness eradicated.
TheMistyMay said:
Useless comment is useless.
Where did I say it would help?
Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS relm. Just a bit of interesting news, welcome to the GENERAL forum.
Don't hate just to hate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not hating, but if you knew it wouldn't help why post it since its for a completely different device
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
In other news: redundancy is redundant.
task650 said:
The skyrocket isn't anything like our I777. This doesn't help at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we're already aware the ****rocket got an ICS leak that was useless to us. Thus this thread is useless because it's redundant - the OP is yet another person who broke the XDA rules and posted without searching. The ****rocket ICS leak has already been discussed numerous times in other threads, it is NOT news and does NOT justify creating yet another new thread so that you can get "omg I have my own thread on XDA!!!" cred.
We're about a week out of kernel sources, and we already have ICS in a better state than that leak. The only things that remain are polishing and NFC, and the polishing part would be required even if we'd gotten official ICS at the same time as the I9100 - it simply takes time to do a proper kernel on a new source base for a completely new Android base.
NFC may require an official I777 ICS release, or maybe just a bit of hacking to get the M250S/K stuff working on I777. If I can get the M250 stuff working on I777, there's a good chance I can get it working on CM9 at that point too.
Redundant thread is redundant.
Closed thread is closed.
Related
Just as the title says...Can we now?
Which problems? This build is the same ED01 build we found a few days ago.
Doubt it will make a huge difference. Its nearly the same as EC01.
Sent from a Limited Edition phone from a Premium app..
Check out evil fascination rom. Pretty nice, based on what I believe to be the same build sent ota tonight. Thats as good as it gets right now imo.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
How about you fix them yourself Or be a little less impatient and a little more grateful of how much work these dudes do for us.
finakechi said:
How about you fix them yourself Or be a little less impatient and a little more grateful of how much work these dudes do for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's just asking a simple question. No need to answer that way.
Yes, it IS true that there probably isn't MUCH of a difference between this and EC01...
However, this is what I was waiting on to update my ROM, personally, so I will be doing this in the next few days. As for what other developers would like to do, that is a personal choice, they may simply not see any reason to and won't.
So besides those like me who make the choice to do anything with it, you probably won't see anything happen. Just keep in mind that just because it is official doesn't really make it any better than what we have at this moment. I haven't explored it yet, but that is my opinion on the matter.
DirgeExtinction said:
He's just asking a simple question. No need to answer that way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the OP cannot understand simple forum rules I see no reason to censor comments made towards him *edit* unless the intention is to "flame" said user.
This is a question, not a ROM or anything being DEVELOPED and it has no place here.
Now say if this were asked in Q and A I would see your reasoning at being a little harsh.
gkirby11 said:
When the OP cannot understand simple forum rules I see no reason to censor comments made towards him.
This is a question, not a ROM or anything being DEVELOPED and it has no place here.
Now say if this were asked in Q and A I would see no reason to be slightly harsh .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my frozen yogurt filled fascinate
also most people want aosp,cm fixes and this will not help them, the stuff they want fixed is tied to tw which had been stated hundreds of times.
SC2.9.2 Voodoo Eclipse
Something to that effect (Touchwiz source doesn't help AOSP so much) should honestly be stickied to the top of the development forum, although I doubt that would help that much anyway with the type of people who post these threads...
People don't remember how long it took for JT to even get a good Eclair AOSP build working. I think it's somewhat clear that Samsung's releases are not terribly useful for AOSP ROMs.
gkirby11 said:
When the OP cannot understand simple forum rules I see no reason to censor comments made towards him *edit* unless the intention is to "flame" said user.
This is a question, not a ROM or anything being DEVELOPED and it has no place here.
Now say if this were asked in Q and A I would see your reasoning at being a little harsh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I really think that mods should temp-ban these people who just post wherever they want.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
We don't have everything we need from Samsung. Stop asking. It's been said already.
times_infinity said:
We don't have everything we need from Samsung. Stop asking. It's been said already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats all folks!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Sorry I just think it's a little rude to post this in the Development forum is exclamation points and CAPS!!! It came off very "ugh why do these dev roms have so many problems can we just get them fixed? GAWD!"...to me. I am not a developer but I am very aware that it is not nearly as simple to do what they do as some people seem to think. Maybe I over reacted a little, but that type of attitude pisses me off.
How much longer is Samsung gonna b*ttf*cks us before we get that official ICS update for Galaxy tab 10.1??
They said late March and today is 21st of March. Where is that update?
Euroman28 said:
How much longer is Samsung gonna b*ttf*cks us before we get that official ICS update for Galaxy tab 10.1??
They said late March and today is 21st of March. Where is that update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when did they say late march... ? :L
yup. they better release before april or else......i will cry
Jay Rock said:
yup. they better release before april or else......i will cry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be prepared to sob, then .
Sent from my SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
theROMinator said:
Be prepared to sob, then .
Sent from my SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no worries. i have my tear drops ready.
Euroman28 said:
How much longer is Samsung gonna b*ttf*cks us before we get that official ICS update for Galaxy tab 10.1??
They said late March and today is 21st of March. Where is that update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Grow up. Samsung isn't doing anything to you. XDA is for people who want to load custom ROMs. There's at least three ICS ROMs available now in the dev forum. If you just want Samsung's (bloated) ICS, why are you here?
slack04 said:
Grow up. Samsung isn't doing anything to you. XDA is for people who want to load custom ROMs. There's at least three ICS ROMs available now in the dev forum. If you just want Samsung's (bloated) ICS, why are you here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well an official release sure would be good, don't you think? Along with complete working drivers.
Dont want an official release if it's going to be as bad as the sgs2 ICS ;-)
well, the one and only reason we're waiting for the officail release is to get the camera drivers. As far as I'm concerned everything else is working great in Kang rom.
Regards
/Per
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk
Jay Rock said:
Well an official release sure would be good, don't you think? Along with complete working drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about my comment would suggest I don't think Samsung should do an official release? I'm just fed up with the whining. What's the point? It doesn't get us any closer to working camera drivers, and it's just mucking up the forum (which wouldn't be such a big deal if the mods would occasionally delete nonsense threads like this....).
BTW- for others thinking maybe Samsung reads these forums: they don't. XDA is (well, it was...) for power-users and devs. We are a tiny fraction of the customer base, and (if you know anything about the business) pretty unimportant. This isn't an insult; it's honesty.
Also, if you want a reason to be angry at Samsung, consider the way the workers in the factories are treated. You think Samsung treats you bad? Try being one of the young women that build the components in the factories, or the people who live nearby and can't drink the water from their own well... You've got it pretty good. You'll get ICS, stop whining on XDA. (BTW- this is directed at the OP, not Jay).
slack04 said:
It doesn't get us any closer to working camera drivers, and it's just mucking up the forum (which wouldn't be such a big deal if the mods would occasionally delete nonsense threads like this....).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<offTopic>
I totally agree, but that's what the report button is for. The mods have plenty to do and can't cover every thread in every forum. Reporting always works a treat for me.
</offTopic>
pergoteborg said:
well, the one and only reason we're waiting for the officail release is to get the camera drivers. As far as I'm concerned everything else is working great in Kang rom.
Regards
/Per
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm very appreciative of Pershoot and cyanogen, but for me galaxy task is smoother and more stable.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using XDA
Whining about whining. Anybody else see the irony?
Please use the Q&A Forum for questions &
Read the Forum Rules Ref Posting
Moving to Q&A
Wait, slack isn't it Apple factory who has it THAT bad? I'm pretty sure all the news headlines were directing it at apple. Samsung does treat it's people a bit better compared to apple.
I don't see how the release can be any different? I thought ICS was supposed to be, "one general OS for all devices" which mean's only minor changes need to be made to adjust to the platform it will be installed on as they already have all the official driver's ahead of time before release. Problem is they pamper the new devices and focus on them that they leave devices like GTab, in the dark.
I've quit anticipating the ICS release with Samsung's horrible "Survival of the fittest" stunt they pulled on which will and will not get the ICS update, no compensation pack was offered aswell despite their promise.
I just went to check whether an update is released (I was bored) and It said "an update is available for your phone, but the servers are busy." What do you guys think this means? There's a thread on this for the skyrocket too...
I think it was ****ed up that Willy Wonka made Charlie think he didn't win the contest.....
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!!!........
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
And Red should be in to break his foot off in your ass shortly.
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
tylerdurdin said:
I think it was ****ed up that Willy Wonka made Charlie think he didn't win the contest.....
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!!!........
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
shadowskorch said:
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's xda... thats 50% of the content.
It's the hidden law that people have to magically know that for the AT&T GS2 forum that you must only post in this thread right here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554561
Just amazing...
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I updated my phone yesterday its lighting fast now and there is this new unicorn wallpaper that is really amazing...
sent on my hacked telly from interspace...
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
yahoowizard said:
It's the hidden law that people have to magically know that for the AT&T GS2 forum that you must only post in this thread right here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554561
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, I didn't know about that 'hidden law'. Sorry everybody
Phalanx7621 said:
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
yahoowizard said:
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh where to start on how wrong you are
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Nick281051 said:
Oh where to start on how wrong you are
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, okay, okay, I've seen that one post about how there's only developers here and whatnot. But yeah, this thread in particular does help developers somewhat, so yeah.
shadowskorch said:
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll face a lot of people like that here lol.
yahoowizard said:
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um that's 3 reasons?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
ChefAnt said:
Um that's 3 reasons?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And now would be a bad time to tell you that I'm currently studying math in college >.>
But yeah, I was going to counter his two with my two, then I added one later on as I thought of it. Never bothered to change the initial sentence though
Dude. When ICS hits it hits. And if u can't find anything on Google about ics release dates or possible release dates u aren't searching right. Either way when it does drop u go right ahead and flash that buggy bloated OS. I'll stick with my AOKP.
Edit: I sound like a douche in this post. So no more arguing. Hope we get official ics too sometime soon. But odds are I won't flash it anyway ;-p
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
yahoowizard said:
Haha, okay, okay, I've seen that one post about how there's only developers here and whatnot. But yeah, this thread in particular does help developers somewhat, so yeah.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh you're right about this being a developers forum but you're completely wrong about the assumptions that only "elite" members can post. You're about as wrong as humanly possible. We only yell at people for threads like these because it does NOT help any developer in any way and this question gets asked over and over again all in separate threads which bog down the forums an leave less room for the more legitimate questions/ posts. And once you've been on here a while you usually know when you should post a thread or when you shouldn't. I've created a total of 2 threads and only one of them was a thread asking a question (the other was for a pair of cm7 themes) and I made sure it hadn't been asked before. Understand a little better?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
yahoowizard said:
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am with you on how this i777 should behave and tone down but you list 3 reasons that I think useless, or should I say "non-productive", here's why
1. If you google/search and find nothing, you MUST think, I mean automatically think, that it is either NOT NOW or NEVER happen. Just like when you search a word and it isn't in the dictionary, you should automatically know that the word is not exist or not being defined yet.
2. custom ROM is for who love to flash, if ones don't want to flash, why would they come here in first place? Moreover, if AT&T decide to release their OFFICIAL ICS for this i777, the owners would get the update automatically, right? Then why stop here anyway
3. If the official ICS did come out? if so, then search/google in step one already yield some results.
Phalanx7621 said:
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everyone roots/roms. I'm waiting on the official update. From past experiences there are people within the industry on this sitewho have information that isn't yet released to the public.
Hello,
Simple question:
Do you think we guys with our evo'S will ever get the 4.1-Android "the official way"?
idk what you guys have it with "official", our devs work hard to give us unofficial stuff and i think we should appreciate that more.
i'd love to see a JB unofficial (if even) for our htc evo 3d gsm.
No.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Sprints already given up on the 3D, I'm going to say no.
Nope, we will never ever see an official JB Update.
Short answer....absolutely not
At this point we will be lucky to see ICS 4.0.
A 4.1 JB Official release is a pipe dream, not going to happen.
Lord, not another one of these "do you guys think we'll get," threads.
At this point we will be lucky to see ICS 4.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see ICS on my 3devo every day, thanks to the developers. ;-)
I don't think we'll see an official JB OTA, but I really hope we see an ICS OTA and source release. If we get the updated kernel source, XDA will produce a JB daily driver.
there have been over 15 threads in this one section on the same question in the last 3 days. hmmmm interesting.
ICS and JB seem to be similar to each other that ud hope it could just be upgraded without much work... but you forget that most of us are now running Sense 3.6 and that would have to be worked on as well. given that only this device a few others even have sense 3.6 the answer is clearly that ..
it will never occur.
im sure project butter and even 90 percent JB roms will be made... if anyones working on it, hope they speak up
Well hopefully everyone that's thinking of creating another thread like this will be able to comprehend the answer is "NO" (In Our Opinion), and be able to resist. Cuz seriously, these type threads just clutter things up for everyone, and help no-one.
No offense to OP.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Hello
Simple answer
We have about 10 threads like these.
You can follow me on Twitter - @NotSo1nter3stin
I say we just ban all thread starters of this topic for the next month. If you all notice.. ever single one of these threads were started with someone with less than 25 posts. admins need to enforce the rule that no one can post until 25 posts. make them actually use the site first.
runcool said:
enforce the rule that no one can post until 25 posts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wat.
All jelly bean discussion goes here for now on
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739962
Thread locked
xda moderator/recognised contributer
Well look what we have here! Samsung has finally released the source code for the i777 ICS kernel.
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=I777
helfrez said:
Well look what we have here! Samsung has finally released the source code for the i777 ICS kernel.
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=I777
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we care why? I'm damn near positive it doesn't benefit us
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Nick281051 said:
And we care why? I'm damn near positive it doesn't benefit us
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why does every **** and Jane feel the need to jerk off on the forums? The post is in the general forum, and it is general information. Go troll some other thread for attention please and thank you.
helfrez said:
Why does every **** and Jane feel the need to jerk off on the forums? The post is in the general forum, and it is general information. Go troll some other thread for attention please and thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because your posting crap about ICS for our device. we dont care, its old and we've had it perfect for quite some time now.
we're onto Jellybean. thats news. ICS source....no DEV cares about that.
MotoMudder77 said:
because your posting crap about ICS for our device. we dont care, its old and we've had it perfect for quite some time now.
we're onto Jellybean. thats news. ICS source....no DEV cares about that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I rest my case your honor lol. Point proven.
helfrez said:
Why does every **** and Jane feel the need to jerk off on the forums? The post is in the general forum, and it is general information. Go troll some other thread for attention please and thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
helfrez said:
I rest my case your honor lol. Point proven.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow way to be a ****, really this information is pointless
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
I mean its cool that they FINALLY decide to do this, and I'm sure that there will be some people who it will benefit. But as someone already said,I think that the development will be headed towards trying to get a working stable jelly bean build.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Imagine if we would've had to wait on ICS source to having working ICS. D:
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Phalanx7621 said:
I mean its cool that they FINALLY decide to do this, and I'm sure that there will be some people who it will benefit. But as someone already said,I think that the development will be headed towards trying to get a working stable jelly bean build.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No debating that fact, this was just a simple post about something relevant to the device being FINALLY made available. If I thought it would be responsible for some development breakthrough, I would have put it in the dev forum..no wait, that's for development..so I is just a general piece of information...but wait it's in general..
The ongoing problem, not just here, but rampant everywhere, is people feel empowered to be jerks because they have some grand illusion of themselves being elite. The post was general information, in the general section, for the specific device, there was no need for the snarky remarks. It's just another shining example of how much things have changed around here, and not for the better.
Last time I checked, XDA didn't have a rule that stated that only information deemed relevant to MotoMudder77 and Nick281051 may be posted in the General Section. To Phalanx7621's point, many people are looking upward and onward to JB, but it is going to be awhile before we see a fully stable JB build, as many of the ICS build still have quirks. Maybe this can help, maybe it won't, but how about we leave it up to the actual rom developers to decide.
Red5 can you just lock this thread before it get's out of hand. Thanks.
nbunn said:
Imagine if we would've had to wait on ICS source to having working ICS. D:
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know right. Kernels are never really CRITICAL unless there is a bad driver incompatibility or something of that nature. Look at something like my old Atrix, the ICS builds are still struggling due to a lack of drivers.
Actually this is very useful. Although we know it's there we can finally see the brickbug in the flesh. It's often useful to do a full source tree compare to see if there is anything 'interesting' left out between i9000 and i777.
helfrez said:
No debating that fact, this was just a simple post about something relevant to the device being FINALLY made available. If I thought it would be responsible for some development breakthrough, I would have put it in the dev forum..no wait, that's for development..so I is just a general piece of information...but wait it's in general..
The ongoing problem, not just here, but rampant everywhere, is people feel empowered to be jerks because they have some grand illusion of themselves being elite. The post was general information, in the general section, for the specific device, there was no need for the snarky remarks. It's just another shining example of how much things have changed around here, and not for the better.
Last time I checked, XDA didn't have a rule that stated that only information deemed relevant to MotoMudder77 and Nick281051 may be posted in the General Section. To Phalanx7621's point, many people are looking upward and onward to JB, but it is going to be awhile before we see a fully stable JB build, as many of the ICS build still have quirks. Maybe this can help, maybe it won't, but how about we leave it up to the actual rom developers to decide.
Red5 can you just lock this thread before it get's out of hand. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What quirks does ics have? We only needed i9100 source. This will lead to no "developmental breakthrough"
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
I agree with OP, this is information relevant to our device and so belongs in the general section. If someone feels it isn't, be civil about it. Politely state your opinion and leave the thread. There's no reason to carry a bad attitude about it.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Nick is a wanna be mod that ****s in every single thread that people post. Useless post is useless.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
kletiz said:
Nick is a wanna be mod that ****s in every single thread that people post. Useless post is useless.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and this thread is done.....
we have source, good deal. whether or not we need it matters none.
good share, but trust that those who actually want it, knew about it before this thread.
You call his posts useless, we are trying to help noobs realize what is important and what isnt.
This thread. useless. along with my posts explaining all this.
now lets let this be huh?
kletiz said:
Nick is a wanna be mod that ****s in every single thread that people post. Useless post is useless.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not a wannabe mod and i dont **** on everyone's post, you're full of crap
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Nick281051 said:
I'm not a wannabe mod and i dont **** on everyone's post, you're full of crap
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just go away, kid
Source dropped. That's nice can we be civil and move on.
Kthanks
transmitted from the Dark Obelisk
Nick281051 said:
And we care why? I'm damn near positive it doesn't benefit us
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it was only useful to figure out whether UCLE5 was dangerous.
Some users determined that the hard way for us.
private void rant()
{
The bad blood of some of the posters is an awful ingredient for a good community.
The elitism is discouraging and the arrogance poisoning.
You know that if a thread seems useless to you, why post and give it relevance? Let it die and it will truly reach irrelevance. There's no further point for a thread that went to oblivion (aka page 5+).
To me it reeks of immaturity and arrogance, and a huge lack of perspective on the world, internet forums and life in general.
This could have little to no value to most/all devs, but what's the need to state it over and over again. This thread has few insightful responses and they come from real devs like Entropy.
If you have never developed a single non-trivial program, how can you be so fast to judge a source code that you won't even download, read or understand? As Entropy stated, at least this gives us some insight on the brick f--k up. Too bad we could not gather it non-empirically.
}
Sorry for the rant.