I have removed this kernel and will no longer be distributing my kernel on XDA or participating at XDA. I received a request regarding the GPL which I could have easy complied with; however, it really irked me because making the request itself was very hypocritical.
XDA as a site is extremely hypocritical. They enforce the GPL against kernels but I have never seen them raise an issue regarding all the ROMs here which include gpl software but don't provide source. An example would be busybox. I have yet to see a developer distribute the code for it although almost very ROM on this site includes it. Also there are certain developers which don't provide source for their work as required by the gpl and action is never taken against them but it is against others.
Any enforcement of copyleft or copyright by XDA is really hypocritical because very ROM on this site violates copyright. Even the AOSP ROMs contain proprietary copyrighted software which the developers don't have a license to distribute. Any ROM based upon HTC Sense, Samsung Touchwiz, or any other vendor environment is violating copyright because these companies have not granted a license to distribute their software.
Are you using a ROM with Beats on your Evo 3d? If so the developer distributing it is violating HTC's license and you are to because HTC hasn't granted you a license to use it.
I'm not saying these things should be enforced and XDA should ban all ROMs, but what they shouldn't do is pretend they are protecting free software or policing against pirated copyrighted software. XDA is built upon violating free software and violating copyright. They have chosen to selectively enforce copyleft and copyright to suit their needs. Anytime selective enforcement is allowed it will lead to abuse of the privilege to selective enforce. This is exactly what is happening at XDA.
XDA needs to either to fully enforce copyleft and copyright or to not enforce. The current situation is extermely hypocritical and in the end leaves XDA just as exposed to legal action as not enforcing copyleft and copyright.
I appreciate all the thanks I have received from users and regret that I cannot continue to provide you kernels here at XDA.
sweet! thanks brA!!
Thanks for sharing.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Thanks! Do you plan on adding oc and undervolting?
wikdNoob said:
Thanks! Do you plan on adding oc and undervolting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same question.
Thanks dude....gonna try it out....how much quicker does it charge?
wikdNoob said:
Thanks! Do you plan on adding oc and undervolting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't plan on adding either. The performance and battery life for the latest kernel are acceptable to me. My goal for this kernel is stability over performance. The reason I created this kernel is that the existing kernels which provided these features also tried to squeeze out as much performance as possible and in doing so caused stability issues for many people. I wanted the features but with the stability of the stock kernel.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
mrjaydee82 said:
Thanks dude....gonna try it out....how much quicker does it charge?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For a description of the fast charge patch and how to use it see http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24644490. By default it is disabled.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
dodava said:
I don't plan on adding either. The performance and battery life for the latest kernel are acceptable to me. My goal for this kernel is stability over performance. The reason I created this kernel is that the existing kernels which provided these features also tried to squeeze out as much performance as possible and in doing so caused stability issues for many people. I wanted the features but with the stability of the stock kernel.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the performance is acceptable only. No more than that. This is your kernel and you decide what you do but as you know this isn't the default speed of the CPU. Many many people will have issues with this kernel OC'ed, UV'ed or not. Generally people having problems are not caused by OV the phone, its simply because their phones don't like other kernel than the stock one. Many people have problems, many people not. Just my opinion. Keep going.
Ps: My phone can handle 2 ghz perfectly all day without issues while others have random reboots even @1.2 ghz.
Q??
Hey nice work man , how well does this thing sleep? I'm on Anthrax RSL8 and it drains about 2% an hour.
dodava said:
I don't plan on adding either. The performance and battery life for the latest kernel are acceptable to me. My goal for this kernel is stability over performance. The reason I created this kernel is that the existing kernels which provided these features also tried to squeeze out as much performance as possible and in doing so caused stability issues for many people. I wanted the features but with the stability of the stock kernel.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough. Even without adding those, its nice to have another kernel dev around here. Thanks again.
How would 2-way call recording be enabled?
Now there is no excuse for me to return to the stock kernel, your kernel plus MR 392, ponury and beats running perfectly. Thank you very much
saboxerman said:
How would 2-way call recording be enabled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get an app in market
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
jrmatics said:
You can get an app in market
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's one that was recommended in another thread that got pretty good reviews in the Market:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skvalex.callrecorder
I haven't tested it myself since I don't use call recording.
ramjet73
ramjet73 said:
Here's one that was recommended in another thread that got pretty good reviews in the Market:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skvalex.callrecorder
I haven't tested it myself since I don't use call recording.
ramjet73
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the app I used for testing.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
wikdNoob said:
Fair enough. Even without adding those, its nice to have another kernel dev around here. Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been talked into adding undervolting and overclocking. The default will always remain the same as stock and my stance is going to be I don't guarantee proper operation if you do either.
Not sure when I will add support. Work is keeping me pretty busy right now. Hopefully I can squeeze in some time this weekend.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
I have been using it for a little while and it works and records great
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Goonzy said:
Hey nice work man , how well does this thing sleep? I'm on Anthrax RSL8 and it drains about 2% an hour.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When used with MeanROM I'm draining less than 1% an hour when sleeping.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
I just uploaded a new version (0.3). I had a few minutes today and unlocked support for 1.51Ghz. I will work on other OC frequencies and undervolting when I have more time this weekend.
Related
Is there a working custom kernel for Cyanogenmod yet? I know entropy's isn't compatible.. is there one out there?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Cm7 already comes with a working kernel
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Wrong section! and no there isn't anything other than the stock kernel that comes with the cm7
I was referring to the one already packaged in cm.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Hopefully not. It makes it easier for CM devs to work out the bugs and kinks when they don't have a bunch of other kernels out there. I know they've requested devs on other phones to hold off on kernels. Wouldn't surprise me if they did the same here.
Sent from my ATT GS2
avengeryarr said:
Hopefully not. It makes it easier for CM devs to work out the bugs and kinks when they don't have a bunch of other kernels out there. I know they've requested devs on other phones to hold off on kernels. Wouldn't surprise me if they did the same here.
Sent from my ATT GS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea, cause I root and flash because I wanna use software of my choice hmmm.. i guess i shoulda bought a popular phone, er.. wait.. i mean one that was popular before it was pulled off the shelves.. now im stuck with stock or stock kernel, no oc above 1.6, and no native way to mod the lock screen.. WOO freakin HOO!!
and of course the asshole answer is "if you want XXXXXX then learn to dev.." yea right..
oh well.. at least its a 1/2 step above owning a Thrill. as far as options go..
geraldf80 said:
yea, cause I root and flash because I wanna use software of my choice hmmm.. i guess i shoulda bought a popular phone, er.. wait.. i mean one that was popular before it was pulled off the shelves.. now im stuck with stock or stock kernel, no oc above 1.6, and no native way to mod the lock screen.. WOO freakin HOO!!
and of course the asshole answer is "if you want XXXXXX then learn to dev.." yea right..
oh well.. at least its a 1/2 step above owning a Thrill. as far as options go..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you want to get people mad at you? Show some patience. More dev work is available to this phone than most if not all new phones on the market.
For your sake from the responces that a comment like that will draw, I hope you're joking.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
No respectable kernel offers OC over 1.6
The only person who claims OC higher than 1.6 is Mr. "snake oil" Tegrak, and he's too busy violating the GPL to back up his claims.
Nearly everything in my kernel was pulled from the CM7 source base, and I have provided atinm with patches for any significant modification/bugfix. If you could flash my kernel on CM7 you would see little to no difference.
The device has only been pulled from shelves in LTE markets where AT&T is aggressively marketing LTE devices with availability shenanigans and extra discounts to drive adoption - most of these markets are ones where stores didn't stock the I777 in the first place.
CM7 developers make the same request on ANY phone that has an official CM7 port. It's the CM7 way.
Entropy512 said:
No respectable kernel offers OC over 1.6
The only person who claims OC higher than 1.6 is Mr. "snake oil" Tegrak, and he's too busy violating the GPL to back up his claims.
Nearly everything in my kernel was pulled from the CM7 source base, and I have provided atinm with patches for any significant modification/bugfix. If you could flash my kernel on CM7 you would see little to no difference.
The device has only been pulled from shelves in LTE markets where AT&T is aggressively marketing LTE devices with availability shenanigans and extra discounts to drive adoption - most of these markets are ones where stores didn't stock the I777 in the first place.
CM7 developers make the same request on ANY phone that has an official CM7 port. It's the CM7 way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only thing I miss from the kernel work in the DHD section is kernels for CM7 with UV and more governor options such as smartass.
Drew
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Hello, everyone
What is it that you expect from a kernel developer? Also, do any of you run gingerbread as of the moment? I only ask because I am trying to take on the task of being a new contributor to this site. I want to contribute by giving you folks kernels. I'm nowhere near done. I am learning, but I feel like I should ask this now. To reiterate, I'm a noob trying to learn, and I’m curious as to what you guys want/see.
i simply want to know what you folks see in a kernel developer, and what you expect from one. While I am typing this, I am fairly nervous of the future responses. I already understand that I violated the rules of XDA by posting this question in general. I am willing to suffer the consequences for my actions as well.
I am simply curious at what you guys think.
DDiaz007 said:
Hello, everyone
What is it that you expect from a kernel developer? Also, do any of you run gingerbread as of the moment? I only ask because I am trying to take on the task of being a new contributor to this site. I want to contribute by giving you folks kernels. I'm nowhere near done. I am learning, but I feel like I should ask this now. To reiterate, I'm a noob trying to learn, and I’m curious as to what you guys want/see.
i simply want to know what you folks see in a kernel developer, and what you expect from one. While I am typing this, I am fairly nervous of the future responses. I already understand that I violated the rules of XDA by posting this question in general. I am willing to suffer the consequences for my actions as well.
I am simply curious at what you guys think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, I think its great what you're doing. Thanks.
I'm still running GB because everything works. I guess that's what I'd want in a kernel. A kernel that will run ICS where everything works including all 3D.
Your avatar is cool.
I think it's awesome that you're stepping up to the plate, I think you should make one to your liking 1st & then branch out from there.
If I could muster up the free time to study, I'd like to do the same.
Sent from my EVO LTE
Just be careful if you make something truly amazing.....
Just saying...
I'd say make stuff for you and not what other people want. If YOU want a specific feature put it in there.
The problem with making it with what other people want, is their is essentially less motivation to do it, the works harder, and you get regular users complaining about your work because it's not how "they" want it.
Enjoy your learning man!
:beer:
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
What chad did was this: he made a kernel the way HE wanted it. He shared it with a few others, who about 1 month later pushed him to post on xda.
Bottom line: make it the way YOU want it
I think most people are concerned with battery life and performance. But...like everyone said, make it how you want it. What do you want most out of your phone?
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
felacio said:
Just be careful if you make something truly amazing.....
Just saying...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you did there.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
So far only two kernel's have impressed me the most.....RCMix kernels (from the desire HD days) and anthrax kernel on the 3D, nothing else has even come close to those two in my opinion.
That's what -I- expect from a kernel.....
what you give will benefit the community surely, so don't let individuals dictate development.....the developers should do that, because at the end of the day....after the dust settles and all is done, it will be the same as what we all want (apart from things like usb host), so welcome and if anybody gives you a hard time, just stick the treasured two finger salute
since you asked... stability. no bs that makes your phone a million times faster or adds couple megapixels to your cam while at the same time adding features that don't even work on most roms.
personally just a kernel that focuses on battery that will be awesome.
Sent from my PG86100 using Forum Runner
ace9988 said:
RCMix kernels
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's in reference to KlQuicksall, the only person I know that brands their kernels RCMix. He's my friend that's helping me learn kernel developing. Hahaha :-D
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
I would agree with the consensus: make something that:
1) is reliable
2) has great battery life
3) has good performance
The order is important.
dfskevinohyeah said:
since you asked... stability. no bs that makes your phone a million times faster or adds couple megapixels to your cam while at the same time adding features that don't even work on most roms.
personally just a kernel that focuses on battery that will be awesome.
Sent from my PG86100 using Forum Runner
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely this.
Sadly most of xda do not have the same opinions for what makes a great kernel.
Sent from my Evo 3D on Sprint's blazing fast 3G network with 4G coverage everywhere
DDiaz007 said:
If that's in reference to KlQuicksall, the only person I know that brands their kernels RCMix. He's my friend that's helping me learn kernel developing. Hahaha :-D
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahaha my psychic powers right there =P, now you're already my fav kernel dev on xda before you do anything =P
they were brilliant on RCmix ROMs and ARHD ROMs
IMO
You won't make everyone happy as the little bugs that make something work for one phone, but, borked for another.
Secondly, I prefer ICS over GB. Just preference.
However, you asked, and this is what I like:
1) Stability
2) Performance in the area of smooth graphics (choppiness sucks)
3) Battery tweaks
4) Something for GSM and CDMA users.
In that order. I don't overclock simply because it's not really needed. I run a stock speed and have smoother graphics with the LeeDroid tweaks on Booster Shot ICS than I did with LeeDroid tweaks on any overclocked GB ROM I ran. Why go 100 mph when going 70 gets you to the same destination and in roughly the same amount of time and using less gas?
I would like to tell you something like this:
1. All things working
2. Great battery life
3. Smooth and fast
4. Compatible with both gsm and cdma..
Does it look like too much request?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
deadlocked007 said:
Cheeky gsm basturd . Jkjkjk haha but I agree with the gsm and cdma part. Then Everyone is happy
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Owh c'mon mate.. It's supposed to be like that, isn't it?
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using Tapatalk 2
I apologize for I know that similar threads have been created but the last one is fairly old. I have mostly been running AOKP for the last few weeks but I recently tried out serendipity- I'll say that I do prefer an AOSP style rom over a samsung rom. I do like customization but battery life is a priority to me. Can someone please give some input to what rom/kernal/governors are being used to maximize battery life?
There is no simple answer to this question. All Kernels and ROMs are good - please refer to Entropy's battery drain thread for common issues affecting battery drain.
Some kernels however offer UV ability e.g. Siyah which allows u more flexibility.
Having said this I saw about the same battery life on most of the ICS roms I tried.
I am currently evaluating custom GB roms to see if the battery life is better.
Aokp and fluxxi. Pegasuq governor or something like that. Don't expect any other help from people. Smh
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Thank you, I will try the fluxi kernel. I know i'm most likely only to receive an open-ended answer at best. It's just that honestly I have tried different combinations on my own without too much success
nbunn said:
Aokp and fluxxi. Pegasuq governor or something like that. Don't expect any other help from people. Smh
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure that works for you but other kernels/governors are better for other people. That's what we're trying to get at so there's no need for a smh.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Nick281051 said:
Sure that works for you but other kernels/governors are better for other people. That's what we're trying to get at so there's no need for a smh.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I understand that, it's just you would think that several people might say "woah hey this particular kernel has amazing bettery life!" But apparently that is not the case...
Hammersuit said:
Yeah I understand that, it's just you would think that several people might say "woah hey this particular kernel has amazing bettery life!" But apparently that is not the case...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we've trained most not to say crap like that. its all dependent on user, apps, and device.
just play with them, find one that works best for you and your setup.
Would like to thank all the Beta Testers of my Elite kernel for Nexus 7. They have allowed me to see how low voltages can go in the device. Also, credits go to _motley, fosser2, Cpajuste, pershoot, catch1571, pinoyto, masterg0g0, morfic etc...and to who ever I missed. Biggest thanks to my wife for giving me the chance to do this.
UPDATED 10/19/2012
1. This kernel is updated to utilize the latest 4.1.2 by Google for Nexus 7
2. Same voltages applied as before to extend your battery life
3. Same speed of CPU and GPU
4. Same warning as below.
Here is the link
https://rapidshare.com/files/1618065280/ClemsynExtremeBatterySaver4.1.2.zip
Or the one in the button
Please reward my hard work by clicking on the DONATE TO ME button under my sig or donate a Hard Drive with at least 60GB space to make it easier for me to compile. THANKS!!
SOURCE: Compressing at the moment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now to the kernel
This kernel is basically a STOCK kernel with voltage lowered to the lowest possible settings to EXTEND battery life. No tweaks other than voltages
This are for Nexus 7 users who care more about BATTERY life and LESS HEAT than overclocking.
Here are the changes.
1. Undervolting is NOT POSSIBLE in this kernel. Undervolting has been done by me in the kernel
2. CPU voltages are default to maintain stability but it shines in undervolting the other aspects of the device, ie: pll_c, memory, emc, host1x, GPU 2d/3d bus etc...
2. vdd_core/vdd_rail decreased voltage from 1.2 to 1.1mv
3. emc, pll_c, host1x, GPU decreased from 1.2 to 1.1mv
4. Compiled using Linaro Toolchain
5. Speed of GPU 2d/3d/vde etc set at 400 mhz (close to stock of 416)
6. Backlight default decreased to 5 for better reading at night and decrease battery consumption
Here is the link OR CLICK ON THE BOTTOM
https://rapidshare.com/files/3373858690/ClemsynELITEBatterySaverStock.zip
WARNING:
Due to aggressive undervolting of this kernel. It might not work with your device. So please be very familiar with backup/restore of your device
** If you like my work. Please do not hesitate to click on the DONATE TO ME button and add to my Nexus7 fund and reward my work. It will be appreciated THANK YOU.
git https://github.com/clemsyn/Grouper
I will use this as my daily driver when I'm not testing kernels.
Edit: I just realized that this is stock, I though it was like the previous 1.5 one of the series. Would you be updating on that regard in the future?
Edit2: Temp wont reach 40.0 C 37.0 C being the mac with none to light use.
Edit3: So has anyone tried to see if init.d support is there?
very nice!
You need to fix the units used in your op
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Nice job great for people who want their battery to last awhile longer
How would this be performance wise lol
morfic said:
You need to fix the units used in your op
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
krazeecracker said:
How would this be performance wise lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
performance will be same as stock kernel. Longer battery life.
Running this now thanks for the work. Right off the bat like the lower brightness.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Oh Clemsyn, always pushing it to the extreme. Gotta love it. Haha battery saving though?! I always expect the opposite from you Thanks and keep up the awesome work. I might give this a try
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
I'll post some battery pics in a few days
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Just flashed on top of Paranoid Android @ 75% battery. Plan to use my tablet heavily for some streaming this evening and I will report back on battery.
Will this kernel allow tweaking in the style of this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1855100
MyronJ906 said:
Oh Clemsyn, always pushing it to the extreme. Gotta love it. Haha battery saving though?! I always expect the opposite from you Thanks and keep up the awesome work. I might give this a try
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know...I'm not used to it...I guess its part of aging process
z1gackly said:
Will this kernel allow tweaking in the style of this thread?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1855100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it works with the stock kernel, it will work with this.
Probably not then, you still have to modify the code to enable init.d support in AOSP source. Will give this a go anyway for the battery saving. Thanks for your work.
I will test it and put the results in my 'Best Kernel' thread. Very interesting...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
sundar2012 said:
Just flashed on top of Paranoid Android @ 75% battery. Plan to use my tablet heavily for some streaming this evening and I will report back on battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, would be very interested in your result
bcvictory said:
I will test it and put the results in my 'Best Kernel' thread. Very interesting...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, would be very interested in your result too
Thanks you for your hard work. I will test it soon
I got 7 hours, 20 minutes on my battery test. Check my thread for more info.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Files, app:
www . Der Kernel . com
Kernel Source: https://bitbucket.org/morfic/trinity_four
This thread benefits from "OT posts" as it fosters a healthy community in which "users helping users" is strong. Which in turn helps me to focus on development.
Thank You for understanding this.
If you need gapps for 4.3, try these simms22 approved gapps for 4.3: http://goo.gl/l6ZlFB
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flash your rom's kernel if you come from another kernel first! Else it may not even boot due to their ramdisk modifications.
Featuring:
Offering lowered voltages
Voltage Control
Color Control (Thanks Francisco)
Build optimizations
Performance through research
Removed wasteful debugging
TCP Congestion control Veno default, more added
VM, scheduler and governor tweaks
384/1512 or 384/1728 if indicated in filename (Use an app that protects the sysfs files to not have OS meddle with freqs)
Bullshít Free (Not pushing buzzwords to drop them later like others)
Stock/AOSP: http://www.derkernel.com/mako.php
Yessssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Wondered when this would appear!
Omg Trinity is here! Morfic Ive been patiently waiting since your GN kernels
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
superleeds27 said:
Wondered when this would appear!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was actually available on his forums for quite some time. Nice to see the XDA thread official now
zephiK said:
It was actually available on his forums for quite some time. Nice to see the XDA thread official now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently i suck at advertising and will not seek a career in advertising
From my forum's post: « on: December 02, 2012, 05:15:52 AM »
Although there hasn't been much development from 19th to 4th, due to vacation, visiting family, it's been around.
finally!
Anyone been using this long enough to judge battery?
(Before it was posted on here?)
superleeds27 said:
Anyone been using this long enough to judge battery?
(Before it was posted on here?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great. i loved the battery life on it!
Finally!
P.S I've been pretty much up to date with Trinity developments thanks to the derkernel forums!
Sweet another kernel to test!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Morfic, so since you been on vacation for a little while have your added the wakelock fixes to Trinity yet?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Sounds good, but quote "(Use an app that protects the sysfs files to not have OS meddle with freqs)"
what apps does that refer to ? any good suggestions; i'm using system tuner atm.
Nice to see this here. Been following/flashing via your forums
meangreenie said:
Sounds good, but quote "(Use an app that protects the sysfs files to not have OS meddle with freqs)"
what apps does that refer to ? any good suggestions; i'm using system tuner atm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trinity app?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Welcome back dude
Glad to see you here...
I waiting for your kernel
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
meangreenie said:
Sounds good, but quote "(Use an app that protects the sysfs files to not have OS meddle with freqs)"
what apps does that refer to ? any good suggestions; i'm using system tuner atm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search for "Trinity Kernel toolbox" on the PlayStore
Bout time you put it here
Sent from my Google Nexus 4
Stefa. said:
Search for "Trinity Kernel toolbox" on the PlayStore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.derkernel.tkt for the lazy people
(it is in morfic's signature after all... )