http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2404047,00.asp
The more the merrier, amirite?
I'll keep the Rezound. Unless this thing gets like 5+ hours of screen on time ill pass.
mr2324jgf said:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2404047,00.asp
The more the merrier, amirite?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a complete downgrade minus the stock sense 4.0
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
superchilpil said:
It's a complete downgrade minus the stock sense 4.0
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you figure it's a COMPLETE downgrade? S4 as compared to our S3, bigger battery, ICS based to name a couple of the perks... I'm not flaming either, just really curious on your opinion as you seem to be pretty with it around here. Don't think it being a droid branded phone will give it more pimp status with verizon?
mr2324jgf said:
How do you figure it's a COMPLETE downgrade? S4 as compared to our S3, bigger battery, ICS based to name a couple of the perks... I'm not flaming either, just really curious on your opinion as you seem to be pretty with it around here. Don't think it being a droid branded phone will give it more pimp status with verizon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't call it a complete downgrade but to name a few things the Rezound has over it..
1.2Ghz vs 1.5 Ghz
4 inch screen vs 4.3 inch screen
540 x 960 vs 720 x 1280 resolution
Other than ImageSense, meh. S4 would be nice I guess, but all it'll do is bump my benchmarks.
mr2324jgf said:
How do you figure it's a COMPLETE downgrade? S4 as compared to our S3, bigger battery, ICS based to name a couple of the perks... I'm not flaming either, just really curious on your opinion as you seem to be pretty with it around here. Don't think it being a droid branded phone will give it more pimp status with verizon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, seems like an upgrade except for screen resolution. Sense 4.0, S4, 1GB ram, this thing should scream.
mjones73 said:
I wouldn't call it a complete downgrade but to name a few things the Rezound has over it..
1.2Ghz vs 1.5 Ghz
4 inch screen vs 4.3 inch screen
540 x 960 vs 720 x 1280 resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The speed of the proc is meaningless the s4 kills the s3. The s3 is a retarded stepchild lol. Screen resolution though is a big bummer... Only a 4 inch screen is a bummer too... :-(
In b4 HTC Droid Incredible 4G HD (one x) now THAT would make me jump ship xD
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
mjones73 said:
I wouldn't call it a complete downgrade but to name a few things the Rezound has over it..
1.2Ghz vs 1.5 Ghz
4 inch screen vs 4.3 inch screen
540 x 960 vs 720 x 1280 resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You REALLY need to read up on the S4 processor if you think that's a downgrade... GHz is only a small part of the equation of processor performance.
I didn't see it had an S4
But otherwise it's not to appealing to me
The rezounds screen has spoiled me
I
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
con247 said:
I'll keep the Rezound. Unless this thing gets like 5+ hours of screen on time ill pass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree.
chupajr said:
You REALLY need to read up on the S4 processor if you think that's a downgrade... GHz is only a small part of the equation of processor performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
screen size and resolution are enuff for me.
that said,ill start watching craiglist in 3 months and when i can get one for $100 ill pick it up then i do have somewhat of a fondness for the inc lineup
scotty1223 said:
i agree.
screen size and resolution are enuff for me.
that said,ill start watching craiglist in 3 months and when i can get one for $100 ill pick it up then i do have somewhat of a fondness for the inc lineup
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This maybe I'll get it in like 6 months just due to the fact that I've had the dinc and dinc 2 so I wanna complete my collection
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
It's the rezound's cute little brother!
Yes the s4 gets better benchmarks than s3 and looks to be a great processor. But in real world speeds you are not going to notice a difference....I mean how long does it take you guys to open an app now...like half a second. And with custom roms I get great battery. Not really worth downgrading screen for the inc4g.
sent from my rezound
4.0" screen?!
super amoled you won't get my love until you make more 4.3" screens your holder >XO
that phone darn well ties with the Rezound if it's not worse, and Verizon probably plans to market the dang thing for $299.99 compared to the $50 I forked out for an arguably better original
Wait for HTC phablet. Quadcore galaxy note competitor
Sent from my ReZound Vensarus 3.0 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
I'll probably like the inc 4g's form factor better cuz I have small hands. But, like others have said I love the Rezound's screen. Watching hulu, netflix, and surfing the web on the Rez is a joy.
I am surprised that the inc 4g is not much thinner than the Rezound.
I am jealous of the s4 processor though. Its more efficient and drains less battery on 4g. I also underclock my rez to 1.2 ghz anyway.
The inc 4g is a great phone, but I would miss the rez's beautiful screen too much. If I had not upgraded yet, I would jump on this.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
mjones73 said:
I wouldn't call it a complete downgrade but to name a few things the Rezound has over it..
1.2Ghz vs 1.5 Ghz
4 inch screen vs 4.3 inch screen
540 x 960 vs 720 x 1280 resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For starters the S4 @ 1.2ghz > S3 @ 1.5ghz, in benches the S4 destroys the S3. But for all your normal usage you won't see much of a difference. 3D games and possibly loadtimes and probably webpage rendering is where you'll notice the difference mainly. Why they would stick a qHD screen on any new device is beyond my understanding. 4 v 4.3 meh no big deal.
It doesn't look bad. I don't really see it getting more devs than this phone. It just looks like a smaller rezound pretty much. With the exception of image sense and the S4 with the smaller lower rez screen, it may get a little better battery life (probably not enough to matter). I just see it fading into the background fairly quickly... The rez to me seems a little more high end even though its older.
The Inc4g just seems kind of blah to me I guess
Related
http://www.mobilebloom.com/could-th...nexus-as-verizons-best-android-phone/2210671/
Maybe this is why Verizon will take their sweet time to release ICS for the Rezound.
They'll take their sweet time because they want to bloat it up.
I Am Marino said:
They'll take their sweet time because they want to bloat it up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, exactly......
theyll take their sweet time because you already paid for your rezound, so there's no more reason for them to worry about what you want. ;-)
The rezound always did smoke the gnexus.
Agreed. Faster proc, physical buttons, NOT a pentile display and higher res camera's.
JTrusty said:
Agreed. Faster proc, physical buttons, NOT a pentile display and higher res camera's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher frequency proccessor, yes. Faster? Debateable.
Also, the rezound has been the best phone on Verizon since they day it came out.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW
Serious amounts of wrong in that article.
"Internally, the two devices use different chipsets in their respective innards with the Rezound favoring the SmapDragon platform while the Galaxy Nexus goes for the OMAP platform"
I lol'd.
I have heard report that the Evo 4G Lte doesnt have the same display like the HTC One X. Instead of the SLCD 2,The Evo 4G Lte is using the IPS display with a 1280 x 720p HD resolution. So is the IPS display better than the SLCD2?
damailmann1 said:
I have heard report that the Evo 4G Lte doesnt have the same display like the HTC One X. Instead of the SLCD 2,The Evo 4G Lte is using the IPS display with a 1280 x 720p HD resolution. So is the IPS display better than the SLCD2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm pretty sure the screen is identical...don't trust what you read into on htc's site
here
Rodderik said:
i'm pretty sure the screen is identical...don't trust what you read into on htc's site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read it from hear.. http://androidcommunity.com/htc-evo-4g-lte-hands-on-20120508/
At sprint.com, they list it as Super LCD:
Specs
Operating system
Android 4.0
Battery information
2000 mAh
Talk time
7.5 hours
Dimensions
5.3 x 2.7 x 0.35
Display
4.7" HD 720p Super LCD
evo 4g lte: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=3444&c=sprint_htc_evo_4g_lte__evo_one_htc_jet
Display_Type: color TFT SLCD2 , 16777216 scales
Displayiagonal: 4.7 "
Display:Resolution: 720 x 1280
Video_out: 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution
one x: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=3210&c=htc_one_x_lte__edge_htc_evita
Display-Type: color TFT SLCD2 , 16777216 scales
Display+Diagonal: 4.7 "
Display+Resolution: 720 x 1280
Videout: 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution
Call me crazy but didn't the spec sheet for the One X say the display was an Super IPS LCD2 capacitive touchscreen
and it says the same thing for the Evo 4G LTE
Exactly....what dude above said.
One X http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_one_x-4320.php
Evo http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_evo_4g_lte-4665.php
Isn't IPS and SLCD2 like one in the same? so he's kinda right lol.
I really hate it when these kinda report happens. Someone needs to verify if its really SLCD 2 or IPS display
damailmann1 said:
I really hate it when these kinda report happens. Someone needs to verify if its really SLCD 2 or IPS display
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
afaik slcd2 is an ips display
damailmann1 said:
I really hate it when these kinda report happens. Someone needs to verify if its really SLCD 2 or IPS display
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think they are one in the same man
Mural of this discovery is simply to realize Corey Gunther(blogger from the OP link) is a dumb ass reporting on Tech...
Well there you have it.
Android Central confirmed that it's the same as the One X.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
What I'm kind of wondering is if the 4g LTE will have any of the same screen problems/defects that the one x has been dealing with. I went through 5 one x's before just giving up and going back to my note until the new evo came out. Any thoughts?
Well they're the same screen so I'd imagine you might be let down..What we're some of the issues one the one x screen I'd you don't mind me asking.
Sent from my sticky fingered ice cream sandwich Evo 3D
Howl4me said:
What I'm kind of wondering is if the 4g LTE will have any of the same screen problems/defects that the one x has been dealing with. I went through 5 one x's before just giving up and going back to my note until the new evo came out. Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes please what issues were you having?
Will
Here is a copy of the thread that is going around for the OneX problems. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1585082
As far as the issues I had, when I/you pressed on the screen it would at act like you were pushing on an lcd laptop screen, you know how you get the waves and ripples. I think it has to do with how the screen was attached on the oneX. The Evo seems to be put together a bit different I believe, at least from what I can see. I don't know I was really looking forward to the oneX and that kind of just ruined it, I'm hoping the Evo is the one for me.
Howl4me said:
Here is a copy of the thread that is going around for the OneX problems. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1585082
As far as the issues I had, when I/you pressed on the screen it would at act like you were pushing on an lcd laptop screen, you know how you get the waves and ripples. I think it has to do with how the screen was attached on the oneX. The Evo seems to be put together a bit different I believe, at least from what I can see. I don't know I was really looking forward to the oneX and that kind of just ruined it, I'm hoping the Evo is the one for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting however I think some of these problems is due to the high res on a small screen these companies are doing this for the first time can't expect them to he perfect go check out the gn and their screen issues common denominator here between all the new phones and diff manufactures is the high res.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
ckoadiyn said:
Interesting however I think some of these problems is due to the high res on a small screen these companies are doing this for the first time can't expect them to he perfect go check out the gn and their screen issues common denominator here between all the new phones and diff manufactures is the high res.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the same thing, but wouldn't that mean that all of them would be that way? From what I was reading through there some people had ones that were working fine without the problems. Guess that's what was making me think default/quality control issue. I'll have to go check out the gn issues.
Howl4me said:
I was thinking the same thing, but wouldn't that mean that all of them would be that way? From what I was reading through there some people had ones that were working fine without the problems. Guess that's what was making me think default/quality control issue. I'll have to go check out the gn issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Working fine without problems is hard to say tho some people don't see or can live with it so they don't speak up. I think there is at least two threads for screen in the gn forum one for vzw n the other for sprint dk about the international lol you would think for as long as Samsung has been doing amoled they would have it near perfect everytime ya know? The minority is almody always the loudest group
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
It's the sane screen. End of story.
sent from 2yr old Evo on ICS
scottspa74 said:
It's the sane screen. End of story.
sent from 2yr old Evo on ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. SLCD2 with IPS.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-57505476-85/leaked-htc-phone-could-flaunt-1080p-hd-display/
May be my next phone.
graymonkey44 said:
http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-57505476-85/leaked-htc-phone-could-flaunt-1080p-hd-display/
May be my next phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats the red one that they submitted to the FCC a while back. wonder what the name of it will be.
S4 1.5GHz processor and Adreno 320 GPU.
nice specs if its real
synisterwolf said:
thats the red one that they submitted to the FCC a while back. wonder what the name of it will be.
S4 1.5GHz processor and Adreno 320 GPU.
nice specs if its real
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beastly specs. Plus running a 1080p screen, this could be the last phone I ever own until they force me off unlimited data.
graymonkey44 said:
Beastly specs. Plus running a 1080p screen, this could be the last phone I ever own until they force me off unlimited data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only down side. if they rez has a 720p screen and it sucks on battery life. i cant imagine how bad a 1080p is going to be.
synisterwolf said:
only down side. if they rez has a 720p screen and it sucks on battery life. i cant imagine how bad a 1080p is going to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'll be interesting to see what type of panel they put in it. I like the look of the panel on the Rez, as you said, it's a battery hog.
mjones73 said:
It'll be interesting to see what type of panel they put in it. I like the look of the panel on the Rez, as you said, it's a battery hog.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah. i think its time for companies to focus on the battery and less on the power. we already have quad cores and LTE. lets start making batteries that will last longer then 4 hours.
That's a tad over 440ppi (ours is 340)... I can't see the pixels on my Rez, this is wayy overkill. Should be something more reasonable like 1440x900.
mjones73 said:
It'll be interesting to see what type of panel they put in it. I like the look of the panel on the Rez, as you said, it's a battery hog.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, its the CPU thats using all the battery. Wlmeng did a test where he had a custom kernel and turned the CPU clock all the way down to 364mhz and he got over 9 hours screen on time.
The screen isn't as bad as you think
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
AshtonTS said:
Actually, its the CPU thats using all the battery. Wlmeng did a test where he had a custom kernel and turned the CPU clock all the way down to 364mhz and he got over 9 hours screen on time.
The screen isn't as bad as you think
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah but an slcd at 720 uses a lot more then one at 480 so if 480 last 14 hours and a 720 last 9 then a 1080 will last 4 hours and thats at craw speeds.
synisterwolf said:
yeah but an slcd at 720 uses a lot more then one at 480 so if 480 last 14 hours and a 720 last 9 then a 1080 will last 4 hours and thats at craw speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure it uses a lot more? I'd imagine the backlight uses the vast majority of the energy, and in an LCD screen that uses the same power no matter how many pixels are in front of it.
scy1192 said:
Are you sure it uses a lot more? I'd imagine the backlight uses the vast majority of the energy, and in an LCD screen that uses the same power no matter how many pixels are in front of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is all speculation. im no way an expert. but from what i have used my inc would last 24 hours with 12+ on the screen alone.
and i know im not factoring the 4g LTE radio and how much of a hog that is. Just thinking out loud, if anyone wants to correct me feel free. :good:
I want it.
My next phone will be a nexus purchased directly from Google. If I can't get good data from the other cell companies then I'll use my rezound as a Verizon jetpack.
I wonder if this new HTC phone Will be a nexus?
Or just keep the Rezound as phone to tether to Nexus 7. Keep your unlimited data and its only $250 for upgraded tablet. Small enough to carry around and will get at least next 2 or 3 operating systems from google. I mean quad core phone really.....grab a tablet that already has quad and a killer screen and just tether to enjoy long battery and 4G speeds.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Grnlantern79 said:
Or just keep the Rezound as phone to tether to Nexus 7. Keep your unlimited data and its only $250 for upgraded tablet. Small enough to carry around and will get at least next 2 or 3 operating systems from google. I mean quad core phone really.....grab a tablet that already has quad and a killer screen and just tether to enjoy long battery and 4G speeds.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is definitely some logic there. I want the nexus device to be a phone, with the jetpack device being optional and rarely touched.
I'd like my main device to always have the latest android os and also function as a phone. So, with a nexus phone I'd use tmobile low cost plans. I'm pretty sure voice. & text will be good, but if data isn't good then I'd jetpack with Verizon. It may require carrying two devices if I'll be away from wifi a long time, and may cost more but I am sick of Verizon games delaying upgrades.
If the only thing going for Verizon is their network, then a small light jetpack will suffice to use their network.
Now back to the subject of this thread, today I was in a store and got to handle a Samsung galaxy note. It is large for a phone, but is amazingly thin. It fits in one hand, but might not fit in your pocket. I think it will fit in a suit jacket, and will fit in cargo pant pockets. Certainly will fit in a woman's purse. But, I have doughts whether it will fit in a typical shirt pocket. I don't imagine it being clipped to the waist belt.
I see the challenges of carrying it around, and this depends on how one is dressed.
synisterwolf said:
this is all speculation. im no way an expert. but from what i have used my inc would last 24 hours with 12+ on the screen alone.
and i know im not factoring the 4g LTE radio and how much of a hog that is. Just thinking out loud, if anyone wants to correct me feel free. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you get 12 hours on your DInc? Underclock? I undervolt and have PureMotives mod on mine and can get maybe 6 hours of continuous usage
Also, they have LTE integrated into the SoC now so 4G on newer devices doesn't use as much battery as on the Rezound
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
I came. Where's a towel?
phuckwithfire said:
I came. Where's a towel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my iPhone...
How to convince my wife she needs my Rez and give her upgrade to me when this baby comes out...I already bought her a ring and married her so I'm running out of options.
dplane said:
How to convince my wife she needs my Rez and give her upgrade to me when this baby comes out...I already bought her a ring and married her so I'm running out of options.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about another honeymoon lol
hi guys i am planning to buy one of this phones (One x plus or the droid dna ) but after seeing many reviews i couldn't chose one of them but i want a super smooth and ultra gaming phone which shall get ? urgent
mouyahama said:
hi guys i am planning to buy one of this phones (One x plus or the droid dna ) but after seeing many reviews i couldn't chose one of them but i want a super smooth and ultra gaming phone which shall get ? urgent
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both are on different networks, so it all depends on which network you prefer. I have the DNA, but I have used the One X+ and they are both great phones. It all comes down to preference at this point. The DNA has a 5" screen, the OneX+ a 4.8". The DNA has a 1080p screen, which is absolutely gorgeous, but the OneX+'s 720p screen is gorgeous itself. Both have similar processors and I believe 2GB of RAM, so there isn't much different spec-wise. Battery-life wise, the OneX+ has a slight edge over the DNA, as it has a 2100maH battery vs 2020maH, and you have to account that the DNA is powering a bigger screen with a higher pixel density. The OneX+ is also a lot more ergonomically comfortable to hold, this partly due to the fact that AT&T doesn't demand visual specifications as much as Verizon does.
If AT&T's network wasn't so bogged down and garbage, I'd say go for the OneX+. The DNA is quick, and aside from a blue splotch in the middle of the screen, has the best display on a smartphone ever, hands down. If you're in an area where AT&T doesn't suck, grab the OneX+. If not, grab the DNA.
majp89 said:
Both are on different networks, so it all depends on which network you prefer. I have the DNA, but I have used the One X+ and they are both great phones. It all comes down to preference at this point. The DNA has a 5" screen, the OneX+ a 4.8". The DNA has a 1080p screen, which is absolutely gorgeous, but the OneX+'s 720p screen is gorgeous itself. Both have similar processors and I believe 2GB of RAM, so there isn't much different spec-wise. Battery-life wise, the OneX+ has a slight edge over the DNA, as it has a 2100maH battery vs 2020maH, and you have to account that the DNA is powering a bigger screen with a higher pixel density.
If AT&T's network wasn't so bogged down and garbage, I'd say go for the OneX+, but the DNA is the greatest phone I have ever used. It is quick, and aside from a blue splotch in the middle of the screen, has the best display on a smartphone ever, hands down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you but sir for your help but i have one more many people say that droid dna doesn't support many apps specially games and always force closing apps unlike the HOX+ is it right ?
mouyahama said:
thank you but sir for your help but i have one more many people say that droid dna doesn't support many apps specially games and always force closing apps unlike the HOX+ is it right ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't noticed any issues of force closing apps, but Android as an entire OS automatically resizes apps to fit any screen. They are not "optimized" for the device yet, as iOS users call it. As far as I'm concerned, I can do anything that I could with my Droid Razr.
I will say that typing in landscape mode on my DNA is so uncomfortable and awkward that I just resort to typing in portrait, using Swiftkey (which is astoundingly accurate and not frustrating at all.) In all honesty, just get the OneX+. Your hands will be happier. To me, happy hands are a better trade-off than pleased retinas.
Also, a few corrections to my OP:
The screen size for the OneX+ is 4.7", not 4.8". It also only has 1GB of RAM, not 2GB. The OneX+ has a slightly higher clocked processor (1.7ghz vs. DNA's 1.5ghz quad core.) If I were you, I would just go to both stores and play with both phones. That's what I tell everyone in my company to do when they ask me for a new phone recommendation.
Get the DNA. Its newer, has a much better chip set and will probably get more updates
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Only thing the ox+ has over the dna is storage. The dna has better everything else(ram, processor, screen, battery life, etc)
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
thank you guys sooo much i think i will go for the HOX+
Bigandrewgold said:
Only thing the ox+ has over the dna is storage. The dna has better everything else(ram, processor, screen, battery life, etc)
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't stress how much of this is untrue, lol. While it might go without saying who can say which chip is better, the OneX+ runs off the Tegra 3 clocked at 1.7ghz, which is slightly higher than the S4. From what I've read, the Tegra 3 handles multicore operations slightly better than the S4. The battery life is actually worse on the DNA than the OneX+ too, FYI.
As far as which is newer, the OneX+ came out around the same time the DNA did, can't really say that one is newer than the other.
majp89 said:
I can't stress how much of this is untrue, lol. While it might go without saying who can say which chip is better, the OneX+ runs off the Tegra 3 clocked at 1.7ghz, which is slightly higher than the S4. From what I've read, the Tegra 3 handles multicore operations slightly better than the S4. The battery life is actually worse on the DNA than the OneX+ too, FYI.
As far as which is newer, the OneX+ came out around the same time the DNA did, can't really say that one is newer than the other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clock speed really means nothing. And while a few games will only run on tegra, but I have yet to find a game on my DNA that I can't run on highest settings flawlessly. Quite a few games will bottleneck on the lackluster ram in the 1x+
And the DNA runs on the brand new s4 pro, not the old s4. I would love to see the 1x+ get 5-6 hours of screen on time
Oh, and even sense will get choppy on the 1x+ due to the ram. On my DNA there is usually around a gig of ram being used(there's currently 1.2 being used) the 1x+ would start lagging like crazy if it got close to its 1 gig.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
LTE
As far as I know DNA wont support 4g LTE on At&t. Its a big factor if you stay in an LTE supported area. Also LTE is not as crowded as HSPA+ so you can expect better speeds.
Like the other guys said, it comes down to the carrier you want to go with. I have the DNA, and my girlfriend has the One X+. I prefer my DNA over her One X+, for many reasons:
- The DNA is easier to pick up when placed on a flat surface, since the One X+'s sides are more curved while the DNA's are flatter.
- The DNA's vibration motor is near silent, while the One X+'s vibration motor is louder than the ring itself.
- The DNA seems to be faster and smoother overall.
- The S4 processor runs cooler than the Tegra 3 (from what I've observed on both our phones).
On the other hand:
- While the DNA's screen is of higher resolution than the One X+'s, the screen on the One X+ does seem to be brighter than the one on the DNA - not sure why this is.
- My girlfriend's One X+ seems to be slightly out-lasting my DNA usually in terms of battery; HOWEVER, I keep my data on all the time, with background sync on, and with several accounts actively syncing. She keeps her mobile data off unless she needs it - then she'll turn it on, use it, and turn the data back off again. She also uses WiFi whenever possible, as opposed to me never using WiFi.
Either way, both of them are good phones!
majp89 said:
I can't stress how much of this is untrue, lol. While it might go without saying who can say which chip is better, the OneX+ runs off the Tegra 3 clocked at 1.7ghz, which is slightly higher than the S4. From what I've read, the Tegra 3 handles multicore operations slightly better than the S4. The battery life is actually worse on the DNA than the OneX+ too, FYI.
As far as which is newer, the OneX+ came out around the same time the DNA did, can't really say that one is newer than the other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, no.
The S4 PRO, found on the DNA, is superior in pretty much every way to the Tegra 3. Every benchmark and real world usage tests I've seen attests to this fact.
In addition, to the best of my knowledge the One X+ has only 1GB of RAM, NOT 2GB (like the DNA).
The One X+ is a great phone, and if you're on a carrier that has the One X+, its a no brainer. But on Verizon, the DNA rules without a doubt.
^ true story.
sent from my DNA Employee Edition 04271
According to HTC the US version is dual core? Yikes.
http://www.htc.com/www/smartphones/htc-one-x/#specs
orangechoochoo said:
According to HTC the US version is dual core? Yikes.
http://www.htc.com/www/smartphones/htc-one-x/#specs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude that's the original one x. We're talking about the ONE X+ here. Its a quad core.
Hobbesfed said:
Dude that's the original one x. We're talking about the ONE X+ here. Its a quad core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arrg.
Thanks for the correction.
I take both the DNA I think it's better, better display and battery is worse than minimal by One X +.
Are both good phones but I think the better DNA
Did you consider waiting for the M7? Sounds like it'll receive a lot more support than either the HOX+ or DNA
Im assuming your using AT&T? If LTE is a must then One X+ is a great choice otherwise droid DNA is an overall better phone in my opinion. Everything from the better screen, better processor, 2 gigs of ram vs 1gig on the HOX+, according to gsmarena, the DNA has better battery life than the one X+ too.
http://blog.gsmarena.com/battery-tests-of-htc-one-x-are-complete-here-are-the-results
http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-droid-dna-takes-battery-tests-heres-what-it-scored/
Sent from my HTC One XL using Tapatalk 2
Bigandrewgold said:
Clock speed really means nothing. And while a few games will only run on tegra, but I have yet to find a game on my DNA that I can't run on highest settings flawlessly. Quite a few games will bottleneck on the lackluster ram in the 1x+
And the DNA runs on the brand new s4 pro, not the old s4. I would love to see the 1x+ get 5-6 hours of screen on time
Oh, and even sense will get choppy on the 1x+ due to the ram. On my DNA there is usually around a gig of ram being used(there's currently 1.2 being used) the 1x+ would start lagging like crazy if it got close to its 1 gig.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, you are not getting 5-6 hours of screen time on the DNA in real world usage. And don't bother trying to tell me that you are because I won't believe you.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
The Rezound ranked third in user satisfaction in a recent survey, besting the iPhone 5. Despite getting almost no support from HTC and Verizon, people are happy with this device. source link
I am sure that this comes as no surprise to users of this forum. Despite being nearly a year and a half on the market, the Rezound still holds its own spec wise.
Of course, I would have far less satisfaction with the device if it weren't for the awesome devs at XDA.
Yep, the development is the only reason I don't have a dna right now. They are still struggling with s off and aosp ril problems. I'm glad there's so many types of roms here to keep me busy
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
I would absolutely hate this device if we didn't have these awesome developers. But spec wise I love this thing
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Haven't been around for a while (for obvious reasons) but saw this, too. It's nice to know that the Rezound has this sort of rating. My daughter has mine now and she loves it, having come from an iPhone 3GS.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Rezound hardware is awesome, especially the screen. The software was made great by devs.
Rezound, s-off, loving it.
Coming from a bolt I can say I won't miss that headache of a phone. This is a great phone but to bad I can late in the game lol.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
If this thing had shipped with an S4 processor it would have been perfect and still the best phone in VZW lineup. I've found a ROM that I love in de-Sensed Ineff Deus, Gr8Nole's red theme, DSB's awesome kernel and all the other tweaks performance-wise. That has freed me up to play in the fun Android activities like theming and app building. The M7 may steal me away if it lives up to expectations but I'm more than happy keeping the Rezound until then.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
If HTC and VZW made a Rezound II with S4, adreno 320, same screen size as current Rezound or slightly bigger but not 5", 1080P (but not a necessity), 16gig onboard, SD card slot, swapable battery (but not necessary if slightly thinner), and better headphone jack shielding. I'd buy it right now even if it was running ICS. The current crop of phones have to many compromises. Non swappable batteries, no SD cards, only 16gig storage, locked bootloader, vz bloat, metered plans, .....ect.
mc_365 said:
If HTC and VZW made a Rezound II with S4, adreno 320, same screen size as current Rezound or slightly bigger but not 5", 1080P (but not a necessity), 16gig onboard, SD card slot, swapable battery (but not necessary if slightly thinner), and better headphone jack shielding. I'd buy it right now even if it was running ICS. The current crop of phones have to many compromises. Non swappable batteries, no SD cards, only 16gig storage, locked bootloader, vz bloat, metered plans, .....ect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt that will ever happen sadly. Would be ideal but HTC atm is VZW's B.
Squirrel1620 said:
Yep, the development is the only reason I don't have a dna right now. They are still struggling with s off and aosp ril problems. I'm glad there's so many types of roms here to keep me busy
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just retired my Rezound for the DNA. The DNA is an awesome device. I really liked my Rezound but the battery life was terrible. The DNA battery life is leaps and bounds better. If not for the developers the Rezound would not have been half the device it turned out to be.
mc_365 said:
If HTC and VZW made a Rezound II with S4, adreno 320, same screen size as current Rezound or slightly bigger but not 5", 1080P (but not a necessity), 16gig onboard, SD card slot, swapable battery (but not necessary if slightly thinner), and better headphone jack shielding. I'd buy it right now even if it was running ICS. The current crop of phones have to many compromises. Non swappable batteries, no SD cards, only 16gig storage, locked bootloader, vz bloat, metered plans, .....ect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love this idea so much.
Too bad I'm sure this isn't going to happen.
A rezound 2 with these specs wouldn't be bad .. But I think the name rezound is kinda lame.. Compared to incredible 4G and DNA
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Squirrel1620 said:
A rezound 2 with these specs wouldn't be bad .. But I think the name rezound is kinda lame.. Compared to incredible 4G and DNA
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They can call it whatever they want, I just mean to emphasize that there has been no true successor to the Rezound as the VZW flagship HTC device. Every thing has been over compromised. The only real compromise the original rezound had was it was kinda heavy and a little thicker than most of it's competitors at launch. Not including ICS, was a small consideration, and all devices at that time where getting terrible battery life.
mc_365 said:
They can call it whatever they want, I just mean to emphasize that there has been no true successor to the Rezound as the VZW flagship HTC device. Every thing has been over compromised. The only real compromise the original rezound had was it was kinda heavy and a little thicker than most of it's competitors at launch. Not including ICS, was a small consideration, and all devices at that time where getting terrible battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except the razr Maxx. If moto unlocked that phone, and I didn't drop it three stories into a pool, I'd still be using it. 30 hours vs 10 is a big difference. Put an extended on this phone and it looks pretty comical to say the least. Chugs way too hard, you'd think LCD > amoled right?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
I've said it before and I'll say it again, there isn't a phone out right now that makes me want to get rid of my Rezound. There all too big, or too sealed, or have AMOLED (or all three).
I'm somewhat attracted to what I've heard of the HTC M4 just because of the size factor.
shrike1978 said:
I've said it before and I'll say it again, there isn't a phone out right now that makes me want to get rid of my Rezound. There all too big, or too sealed, or have AMOLED (or all three).
I'm somewhat attracted to what I've heard of the HTC M4 just because of the size factor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, if the M7 drops with at least 32 gb of storage and an unlockable bootloader I'll be all over it. It sounds like it'll have a better battery than the DNA with similar hardware and a more livable One X size screen.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
LOBBS said:
Yep, if the M7 drops with at least 32 gb of storage and an unlockable bootloader I'll be all over it. It sounds like it'll have a better battery than the DNA with similar hardware and a more livable One X size screen.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also supposed to have SD support.
Specs for ReZound 2 should be this
General Global
Weight 150.1 g
Display SLCD4 capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Res 1080 x 1920 pixels, 4.5 inches
Memory Card slot microSD, up to 64 GB, 16 GB included
Internal 32 GB or 16 GB SSD based storage, 2 GB RAM
Camera Primary 13 MP, dual-LED flash
Secondary Yes, 2 MP
Features OS Android OS, v5,HTC Sense v5 UI
Chipset Intel Atom dual core ,hyper threading
CPU Dual-core 2 GHz
GPU ?????
Battery Li-Ion 3200 mAh battery
Tests Battery life Endurance rating 66h
Proz00 said:
Specs for ReZound 2 should be this
General Global
Weight 150.1 g
Display SLCD4 capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Res 1080 x 1920 pixels, 4.5 inches
Memory Card slot microSD, up to 64 GB, 16 GB included
Internal 32 GB or 16 GB SSD based storage, 2 GB RAM
Camera Primary 13 MP, dual-LED flash
Secondary Yes, 2 MP
Features OS Android OS, v5,HTC Sense v5 UI
Chipset Intel Atom dual core ,hyper threading
CPU Dual-core 2 GHz
GPU ?????
Battery Li-Ion 3200 mAh battery
Tests Battery life Endurance rating 66h
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eww no atom. Tegra 4 or S4 Pro. And no way it's going to be 4.5 in AND 1080p
AshtonTS said:
Eww no atom. Tegra 4 or S4 Pro. And no way it's going to be 4.5 in AND 1080p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check Motorola razor i
the battery is very good for 2000mah that's why i picked it
and there already FHD for 4.7inch whats different 0.2 inch ?