Most folks probably aren't aware of this, but by default, location tagging is enabled in the camera. So, depending on your location settings, the exact location of where the picture was taken gets embedded in the exif data of the image. This is not a problem unless you share your pics on public forums/facebook, etc.
If you want this sort of functionality, do nothing. If you don't, disable the location tagging in the camera app under settings.
gpz1100 said:
Most folks probably aren't aware of this, but by default, location tagging is enabled in the camera. So, depending on your location settings, the exact location of where the picture was taken gets embedded in the exif data of the image. This is not a problem unless you share your pics on public forums/facebook, etc.
If you want this sort of functionality, do nothing. If you don't, disable the location tagging in the camera app under settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
funny thing is the screen protector our phones come with out of the box states this exactly... but oh so many dont read..
lazydazed said:
funny thing is the screen protector our phones come with out of the box states this exactly... but oh so many dont read..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well yes, but it's never been on by default (in the camera) and that message is generic, and not exactly intended for the camera.
Check Me Out On The Google Play Store!!!
Sent From My HTC Evo 4G LTE, On The Now Network From Sprint!
Another warning is that by default the pictures are set to only 6 megapixels. When you enable widescreen it simply crops down an 8mp picture to the resolution of a 6mp one
I've been using quickpic as my default viewer. Looking through the options, there are none to do anything with exif data when sharing. I've been in contact with the author to hopefully add a setting to preferences.
Something along the lines of
Strip gps exif data when sharing
* always
* never
* prompt
This would be the ideal solution. I'd probably leave mine on prompt since I only really share to dropbox. But still, any pic that is shared publicly should probably have gps data removed.
Obscuracam strips all of the exif data by default when you use it to take pictures. Not sure if when open already taken pictures and strip them, kinda seems like that when I opened one and then saved it, it asked me if I wanted to keep the original.
Just go into settings and turn it off if you don't want GPS tagging. Really simple solution!
SteelH said:
Just go into settings and turn it off if you don't want GPS tagging. Really simple solution!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This!
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
While it is true you can disable this feature, the point of this thread was to inform folks that it's on by default.
Please refer to this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1691756
lazydazed said:
funny thing is the screen protector our phones come with out of the box states this exactly... but oh so many dont read..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
best buy mobile removed mine for me, so I never read it...
Related
I found this on a French site, by changing the registry you get an extra camera mode that adds current position in the EXIF part of the file!
You need to edit the key : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\HTC\Camera\P9 change from 0 to 1 (P9 is the Geocoding profile).
No need to soft reset, just go into the camera and set to Geocode mode (see capture)
The files get stored in My Documents/POI (maybe so they appear in Tom Tom?).
Anybody know of cool ways to use this feature? Flickr? Googlemaps?
Sorry if this has been covered already!
Oh hell yes.....
Madhadder said:
Oh hell yes.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean it HAS been covered? could not find anything thru search....
I could never get it to work, it says the GPS is searching, but when I look at the photos I cant find any GPS coordinate data.
Anyone else actually try it?
G
I think Madhadder meant "oh hell yes I can't believe its so easy to add this feature you just made my week".
I'd like to say:
Oh hell yes!
GuardianZX9 said:
I could never get it to work, it says the GPS is searching, but when I look at the photos I cant find any GPS coordinate data.
Anyone else actually try it?
G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the data is included in the file itself in a special zone that holds info on model of camera etc.
There are some applications that "place" the pictures on maps, I do not know much about this but want to find out! The ideal would be to place them on googlemaps...
techntrek said:
I think Madhadder meant "oh hell yes I can't believe its so easy to add this feature you just made my week".
I'd like to say:
Oh hell yes!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good but as much as I would love to take credit for this find, it is in fact from this site : http://www.gpspassion.com/forumsen/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=85924&whichpage=3#641517
8th post down.
edeplano said:
I found this on a French site, by changing the registry you get an extra camera mode that adds current position in the EXIF part of the file!
You need to edit the key : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\HTC\Camera\P9 change from 0 to 1 (P9 is the Geocoding profile).
No need to soft reset, just go into the camera and set to Geocode mode (see capture)
The files get stored in My Documents/POI (maybe so they appear in Tom Tom?).
Anybody know of cool ways to use this feature? Flickr? Googlemaps?
Sorry if this has been covered already!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there are so many line items under that folder. Could you be more specific?
thanks..
I assume that the GPS must be turned on to give the correct position prior to taking the picture, am I right?
Enable
ahmadfarid said:
there are so many line items under that folder. Could you be more specific?
thanks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
P1-P9 are profiles for different camera modes. You'll notice that the "Enable" key is 0 in Profile 9. Change it to 1 and you should be good.
Also found this info on GPS passion, and was going to share, but never found the time....
I did the hack on my Ameo last weekend, and played around with it a little. It is ofcourse quite an amazing feature, and it does impress people that sees it, but given the quality of the camera in the Ameo, I'm not sure how usefull it will turn out to be, I would be a little embarassed to upload any Ameopics to Google at least.
Here is what I've found out sofar, if someone finds that useful.
When you start Camera, you get a new option when you choose your Photomode, called GPS. - This starts up the GPS automatically, and once it gets a fix you are ready to shoot.
The pics you then take are stored in /my documents/my Poi - which is created.
These pics will then have the GPS position included in the Exif data.
Haven't yet found a PPC software that is capable of reading these data, but if you read them with your ordinary pc, you can input them into google Maps (on PPC for instance) and it will take you there.
Picassa will read the data, and you can input them manually into your mapsoftware (the format is: xx yy' zz'' aa bb' cc'') but I would recommend "Panorado Flyer 1.2" which is a great free and small application. It gives you some new options in the context menu, so you just right-click your Gpspicture and choose "show location in Google Maps" - and it opens up Google Earth and takes you there.
There was some discussion on the precission of the GPS Data, actually on this very site I'm pretty sure, maybe the kaiser section(?) , someone noticed the last 2 decimals recorded for latitude and longitude allways were the same, so the precision was less than 100 meters, but the good news is this is not the case with our Athenas, they are very accurate!
I don't think I'm allowed to distribute Panorado Flyer here, but here is the link for you to download it yourself.
Hopefully someone will make a similar app. for PPC, which would make this feature so much more useful.
Here is a link to the free version: http://www.photo-freeware.net/panorado-flyer.php
And here is the commercial and probably more functional version (did not try it, but there is a demo): http://www.panorado.com/en/index.htm
I went to a birthdayparty this week and took a GPSpic inside an apartment on the 7. floor to demonstrate to all how brilliant the Ameo is, got a fix and shot a pic. The pic stinks, but if you want to try Pandora, you should be able to rightclick it and fly over here, even if I downscaled it....
And I just tried myself, and the GPS data did not survive the upload so it does not work, sorry.
Here is a shot of what Panorado rteads for that pic:
works well here
Actually you can use this format directly into Google earth, which is simpler I think:
55,685278 12,584445
Ok Midget, on my setup the GPS data was lost when I d'loaded my own pic from the post.
Also had to try it out on my old uni with an external GPS, but it doesn't have the P9 option, could that be because of the old HTC Camera version (3,00 build 21424) or must it have an internal GPS?
Anyone got the newer Camera version (like the one from the Ameo WM6 - 4.01 build 27598)?
hammermedia said:
P1-P9 are profiles for different camera modes. You'll notice that the "Enable" key is 0 in Profile 9. Change it to 1 and you should be good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh!..ok..i'll try it right away..
thanks
The new mode came right up when I made the registry change. Can someone confirm where the data is stored? Seems there are 2 places mentioned here.
That's freakin awesome! Possibly rates as my top feature of the moment! Good Hack!
And @ techntrek - it goes into my \microdrive\my documents\my poi\
Ace!
I have using panorado software but the error for several pictures on same place (1 square meter) is very large, some hundreds of meters...
beginner said:
I have using panorado software but the error for several pictures on same place (1 square meter) is very large, some hundreds of meters...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is what you will also get when you use googlemap. It can be hundreds of meters off.
I read recently that US goverment wants to decrease the accuracy of GPS. I wonder if it is the result of this project that I noticed that the inaccuracy has been magnified lately.
All the photos I take get captioned with "SAMSUNG". This is lame and I'd like to shut it off but I have no idea where the setting is. Anyone know?
I don't know the answer, but I echo the desire.
Iictinike said:
All the photos I take get captioned with "SAMSUNG". This is lame and I'd like to shut it off but I have no idea where the setting is. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure exactly what "caption" you're referring to. There's no "Samsung" watermark or anything appearing on my photos.
Now, having said this, if you are referring to EXIF data and the fact that by default Windows Vista, 7, and MacOS 10.5.x will display EXIF data fields when browsing a folder filled with images this is normal.
This is a feature, and it's not a new one. Every digital camera on earth made in at least the last 10 years inputs quite a bit of data into the EXIF header of images captured by it. Date, time, f-stop, focal length, even geotag data is stored in the EXIF header. All sorts of info is stored in an image EXIF header. So this is entirely normal. If this is the first time you've ever seen this, then you either have a newer PC for the first time, or this is your first decent camera.
You can disable the display of (or even add tons more) of these specialized folder data fields by right clicking on their header and adding or disabling fields as you desire.
You can also strip EXIF information from images with 3rd party software and/or batch image processing tools.
If merely seeing the word Samsung disturbs you, disable that field in the folder your browsing images in.
Here's an example image showing an example of the selectable nature of fields on my Win7 laptop...
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/t5o2i_tTk1bGzn3Lpv0U5Z1iAXCqSw7wiOmYyza8_dQ
^ I think the point is to be able to eidt this field to show something other than SAMSUNG. I would prefer it to show as "Samsung Vibrant" for instance.
Iictinike said:
All the photos I take get captioned with "SAMSUNG". This is lame and I'd like to shut it off but I have no idea where the setting is. Anyone know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please explain what you mean by "caption". Are you referring to EXIF data as masterotaku described?
I think I stumbled on frames on my Vibrant camera app, but I don't recall how or where. I think one was just "SAMSUNG" on the bottom. I can't find it with my Captivate camera app, so that's all the help I can give.
Saiboogu said:
I think I stumbled on frames on my Vibrant camera app, but I don't recall how or where. I think one was just "SAMSUNG" on the bottom. I can't find it with my Captivate camera app, so that's all the help I can give.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"stumbled on frames" what does that mean??
I clicked something in the mess of a TW dialer/contacts app that brought me to the camera with a frame enabled. MySpace type photo junk.. Flashy graphics around the edges of the shot, and swiping left and right changed the image. I'm pretty sure one of them was just the Samsung logo in the corner.
Saiboogu said:
I clicked something in the mess of a TW dialer/contacts app that brought me to the camera with a frame enabled. MySpace type photo junk.. Flashy graphics around the edges of the shot, and swiping left and right changed the image. I'm pretty sure one of them was just the Samsung logo in the corner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you referring to the "Audio Postcard" app?
s15274n said:
^ I think the point is to be able to eidt this field to show something other than SAMSUNG. I would prefer it to show as "Samsung Vibrant" for instance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It technically does say it but Vibrant is replaced with SGH-T959
E.G.
File Size: 998 kb - 1913 x 1435
Camera Make: SAMSUNG
Camera Model: SGH-T959
Date/Time: 2010:08:20 15:40:12
Resolution: 1913 x 1435
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 3.8mm
Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200)
Aperture: f/2.6
ISO Equiv.: 50
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight
Exposure: program (auto)
GPS Latitude: S 0d 0m 0.00s
GPS Longitude: W 0d 0m 0.00s
Location: 0° 0′ 0.00″ S 0° 0′ 0.00″ W
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
androidmonkey said:
Are you referring to the "Audio Postcard" app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That must be it - it was before I removed bloat, and I haven't seen it since. I guess that isn't what the OP was talking about, then. Not that he's come around to tell us.
masterotaku said:
Not sure exactly what "caption" you're referring to. There's no "Samsung" watermark or anything appearing on my photos.
Now, having said this, if you are referring to EXIF data and the fact that by default Windows Vista, 7, and MacOS 10.5.x will display EXIF data fields when browsing a folder filled with images this is normal.
This is a feature, and it's not a new one. Every digital camera on earth made in at least the last 10 years inputs quite a bit of data into the EXIF header of images captured by it. Date, time, f-stop, focal length, even geotag data is stored in the EXIF header. All sorts of info is stored in an image EXIF header. So this is entirely normal. If this is the first time you've ever seen this, then you either have a newer PC for the first time, or this is your first decent camera.
You can disable the display of (or even add tons more) of these specialized folder data fields by right clicking on their header and adding or disabling fields as you desire.
You can also strip EXIF information from images with 3rd party software and/or batch image processing tools.
If merely seeing the word Samsung disturbs you, disable that field in the folder your browsing images in.
Here's an example image showing an example of the selectable nature of fields on my Win7 laptop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. The EXIF data caption field. I didn't think anyone would mistake what I said for anything else.
It's not a feature. That's a field for user comments attached to the image, not for some asshole programmer to stick a plug for the camera model in there when there's already a standard field for the maker and model of camera.
Yes, I know I can edit it, yes I know where it's stored. Yes I know I can batch strip it and no, this isn't my first digital camera. (You like to talk down to people eh?). I've been using "newer PC's" and digital camera's since you were wetting your bed.
My question was simple. Is there a setting buried somewhere or a file I can edit to disable this phone from tagging "SAMSUNG" in the caption field? If not, then I'll batch script stripping the thing out of there. PITA and I shouldn't have to because some puke stuck it in there.
Iictinike said:
Yes. The EXIF data caption field. I didn't think anyone would mistake what I said for anything else.
It's not a feature. That's a field for user comments attached to the image, not for some asshole programmer to stick a plug for the camera model in there when there's already a standard field for the maker and model of camera.
Yes, I know I can edit it, yes I know where it's stored. Yes I know I can batch strip it and no, this isn't my first digital camera. (You like to talk down to people eh?). I've been using "newer PC's" and digital camera's since you were wetting your bed.
My question was simple. Is there a setting buried somewhere or a file I can edit to disable this phone from tagging "SAMSUNG" in the caption field? If not, then I'll batch script stripping the thing out of there. PITA and I shouldn't have to because some puke stuck it in there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly you're question was extremely vague to start with, so I was feeling out what appeared to be a "newbie" post. If you felt like I was speaking down to you, I apologize, but making vague posts leads people to assume that the poster is incapable of providing specifics. You did not provide any, and now you're ranting like a 5 year old. Will this follow with "your mom" comments??
(Just to be clear I am now DELIBERATELY speaking down to you, not unintentionally as before...your insults were unnecessary.)
Secondly, I'm 43, so I doubt you were doing anything other than wetting your own bed or not even existing when I was doing the same to mine. Grow up ok? TYVM.
Thirdly, Yes EXIF *IS* a feature, and NOT a user only area for applying comments. Ever since the standard was formally created twelve years ago almost ALL digital cameras have been using this header to deposit camera setting and date/time stamp information (and even Manufacturer names). Some (very very few) cameras have allowed this feature to be disabled, but this is rare. Exceedingly rare. Most professional photographers who need to create custom user "comments" in images use the IPTC IIM metadata standard to put user comments in things like images, because that's precisely what it is designed for. EXIF on the other hand is not. That's not to say you cannot modify EXIF data, it's merely that EXIF is not conducive to your concept of a "user comment". It wasn't designed for that. In other words, you're confusing the two and their purposes.
Fourth, some "puke" didn't stick it in there. A programmer who writes digital camera firmware followed a common convention followed by every other camera manufacturer in the world. Most people consider EXIF header information a feature, though there are some who wish to not have EXIF info in their publicly available pictures for privacy reasons. Some people don't want their public photographs with date/time stamps and geolocation info. That sort of thing...
That is easily stripped in those circumstances with common free image processing software. Irfanview just to name one off the top of my head. All photo upload services (that I have used) strip this info in public galleries as well, owing to the obvious potential for liability.
Being annoyed that Samsung wants to put it's name in the EXIF header of images taken on a camera they designed....that's just friggin bizarre, but to each his own.
Finally, It's not going to be some simple little "toggle" or setting as it's a function of the camera software itself. Samsung has released most of their source code true, but not for their proprietary apps. Camera driver source exists, but not the camera software itself. You'll likely have to just put up with ....
1). Being an obnoxious twit
2). Waiting for CM6.1
3). Adjusting your tinfoil hat
p.s. If you think the word "SAMSUNG" in the "ImageDescription" field is some evil Samsung conspiracy (especially considering in most situations you have to go out of your way to see it in the first place), well I have bad news for you. They are apparently in cahoots with Olympus, Panasonic, Sony, Nikon, and Kodak from what I see in a cursory examination of my photo library. You could also try to reverse engineer Samsung's camera software of course. Good luck with that after you finish your tantrum.
ZING!!!!!! i hate to say it but homie you were just informed... lol
g1ftmfw said:
ZING!!!!!! i hate to say it but homie you were just informed... lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just not seeing it. It's a wordy, smell your own farts kind of thing with very little fact. Impressive to people used to 4chan or Digg, but really not a decent burn.
Iictinike said:
Just not seeing it. It's a wordy, smell your own farts kind of thing with very little fact. Impressive to people used to 4chan or Digg, but really not a decent burn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least no more juvenile bed wetting comments this time. I try to be wordy to be clear, though I admit I was a bit ticked at the pointless insults. I sincerely meant it when I apologized if I had come across in the initial reply as speaking down to you, though I still don't see what I might have said.
Still, EXIF headers being what they actually are, along with what IPTC headers are, and what practically all digital cameras made in the last decade do are considerable facts you seem capable of ignoring. Sigh...
Seriously though, it's a function of the camera software, which is closed source. It's not too terribly hard to attempt to hex and diff your way around the contents of the camera and camera-firmware apk's, and I actually did just this. The real brick wall here is not having the source, because it isn't available.
I'd say wait for CM6.1, which will likely use (or at least allow the use of) the aosp version of the camera software. From there you can likely eliminate the creation of EXIF data in the image headers.
Just seems like a colossal waste of time to care....Good luck.
I agree with masterotaku, your OP was very vague. Plus, its not called a "caption", its metadata. I took a look at the metadata/EXIF data on my images and the only reference to SAMSUNG i see is
Equipment Make: SAMSUNG
Camera Model: SGH-T959
There are many other fields you can use to add your comments or tags. You are the minority, most people, including me, would hate if they left this data out.
So why exactly do you want this data stripped?
I've been trying to disable this feature but can't seem to find where the setting is.
I'm using the camera.apk in SGS Tools.
I know I could of just turn off the GPS when taking pictures but I don't like doing that.
Bump I want to know too
Settings>Location and security> Untick "Use Wireless Networks.
Alex9090 said:
Settings>Location and security> Untick "Use Wireless Networks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree, unfortunately that's the only way. Remember to turn it back on if you want local searches results from google and what not.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Isn't use wireless network required to download agps data to get faster gps locks?
Or the other way round: does gps take longer to get a lock/fix when you turn it off?
This might seem a bit opinionated, and if so apologies beforehand......but...
I know what people's concerns are here, but they're a bit overblown. Every major photo upload service that I am aware of allows you to strip EXIF geotag data from public photo galleries. I usa Picasa to store my phone pics in the cloud, for when I need prints or need to send a pic to someone, and none of my location data is compromised, so it's like the best of both worlds.
This also includes most all of the social network services that I'm aware of (Myspace, Facebook, Twitpic, etc..). Pretty much all of these resize and/or resample and process images in their galleries and as such EXIF data gets removed.
There are some legitimate concerns with privacy and fraud regarding geotagging, but far more is being made of it than is a reality...unless you're engaging in moronic behavior in the first place which in all likelihood would mean you couldn't tell a geotag from a Geo Prism.
I just emailed HTC about it. I even had to send a photo I took with my Hero with time stamping enabled to show them what I meant. The only thing they can tell me is that it just isn't an option on the Evo 3D. They also told me to look on the market for an app that'll let me add that functionality. Is there such a thing?
I'm adding the same example photo I sent to HTC in this post, so everyone will know what I mean by time/date stamping.
I really don't get why it isn't a standard option.
I was going to add a poll to see how many of you out there think this should be an option added to the camera app, but I can't seem to figure out how to add a poll. lol
Isn't the timestamp simply part of the metadata tags built into the image file?
saltorio said:
Isn't the timestamp simply part of the metadata tags built into the image file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...what he said. Unless you actually want an old school red/orange timestamp on top of your photo? Might find an app for that on the Market, who knows?
dumasauce said:
Unless you actually want an old school red/orange timestamp on top of your photo? Might find an app for that on the Market, who knows?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the sample photo he posted above contains a text colored timestamp on the bottom right hand corner.
i do think it is very odd the camera app does not provide an option for a timestamp and i too have used this feature in the past and think its a good idea.
odd they didn't add that feature. i hadn't noticed until i read this post and checked my camera app .. def no option to put a timestamp on the lower right corner of the photo.
joeykrim said:
the sample photo he posted above contains a text colored timestamp on the bottom right hand corner.
i do think it is very odd the camera app does not provide an option for a timestamp and i too have used this feature in the past and think its a good idea.
odd they didn't add that feature. i hadn't noticed until i read this post and checked my camera app .. def no option to put a timestamp on the lower right corner of the photo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But again, how is a time stamp on the actual photo a benefit over including the time stamp in the image file metadata?
Back when photos were on film, burning the time stamp into the photo itself was the only way to know when it was taken. But these things are digital. Metadata is a much more elegant way to track all sorts of information (like geo tags) associated with a photo, and it's how all the information is stored in the photos the EVO 3D (and pretty much every other digital camera device) takes. Most photo organization software (like most MP3 software) makes extensive use of meta tags for sorting and searching your files. And it doesn't muddy up your images to boot.
saltorio said:
But again, how is a time stamp on the actual photo a benefit over including the time stamp in the image file metadata?
Back when photos were on film, burning the time stamp into the photo itself was the only way to know when it was taken. But these things are digital. Metadata is a much more elegant way to track all sorts of information (like geo tags) associated with a photo, and it's how all the information is stored in the photos the EVO 3D (and pretty much every other digital camera device) takes. Most photo organization software (like most MP3 software) makes extensive use of meta tags for sorting and searching your files. And it doesn't muddy up your images to boot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to illustrate the otherside of the viewpoint you've expressed and address your question.
i guarantee not every android user understands metadata, nor knows how to use/where to find it. i find it comical imaging my parents trying to locate the metadata of a picture they took on their phone.
for those people who still print out their images and want to scrapbook/put in photo albums, they might prefer having the time/date stamped on the front of the image itself.
some people prefer timestamps printed on their photos and some people do not. having or not having timestamps on photos is a matter of personal preference and is a legit request as an option, especially given i've had the option of printing timestamps on the images i've taken with previous android phones.
joeykrim said:
to illustrate the otherside of the viewpoint you've expressed and address your question.
i guarantee not every android user understands metadata, nor knows how to use/where to find it. i find it comical imaging my parents trying to locate the metadata of a picture they took on their phone.
for those people who still print out their images and want to scrapbook/put in photo albums, they might prefer having the time/date stamped on the front of the image itself.
some people prefer timestamps printed on their photos and some people do not. having or not having timestamps on photos is a matter of personal preference and is a legit request as an option, especially given i've had the option of printing timestamps on the images i've taken with previous android phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then go to the official HTC Community forums and make the request.
My X10 didn't have the ability to print time stamps on the photos, neither does my wife's text messaging phone. I'm not even sure if either of our digital cameras (a Digital Rebel, and a Canon point-and shoot) have that capability. All I'm saying is people have to move with the march of technology.
And on a related note: can you imagine your parents even having an EVO 3D?
Here's something. Wouldn't it be possible to just take the setting from the most recent Sense before Sense 3 and add it to the settings in our present camera app?
I'm no programmer, (or I'd just attempt it myself, lol). Just putting it out there so maybe someone will consider it.
The reason for time/date stamping ON the photo in addition to the metadata is the fact that most people, at least in my opinion, when attempting to retrieve the date of a certain photo on the internet, would rather just see it printed right on the photo than have to download the image and look for it in the image info.
Now I'm not sure if I'm just missing it when attempting this or not, but I went to a random site, right clicked on an image and went to View Image Info, and didn't see anything at all about a date or time the image was taken. Only when I actually download the image then go to Properties>Details do I see an actual date/time.
I didn't mean for this to be a debate or anything. Just feel it's wrong not to even give the option anymore. It's not like something like that takes up a lot or space or processing power, or even time processing the photo.
I think It's cool when you need to provide a day and time for a pic that you want to upload online.
johnequickiii said:
Here's something. Wouldn't it be possible to just take the setting from the most recent Sense before Sense 3 and add it to the settings in our present camera app?
I'm no programmer, (or I'd just attempt it myself, lol). Just putting it out there so maybe someone will consider it.
The reason for time/date stamping ON the photo in addition to the metadata is the fact that most people, at least in my opinion, when attempting to retrieve the date of a certain photo on the internet, would rather just see it printed right on the photo than have to download the image and look for it in the image info.
Now I'm not sure if I'm just missing it when attempting this or not, but I went to a random site, right clicked on an image and went to View Image Info, and didn't see anything at all about a date or time the image was taken. Only when I actually download the image then go to Properties>Details do I see an actual date/time.
I didn't mean for this to be a debate or anything. Just feel it's wrong not to even give the option anymore. It's not like something like that takes up a lot or space or processing power, or even time processing the photo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didn't want a debate either so i stopped replying as it was clearly off topic.
copying the settings file from a previous sense version of camera which supports the time/stamp, *could* work, assuming the current camera.apk supports time/stamping and they just forget/intentionally didnt add it to the options menu inside the camera.apk.
i dont have a previous sense phone, like the EVO, handy to pull the camera settings file from /data/data ..
on the EVO3D the settings file is: /data/data/com.android.camera/shared_prefs/com.android.camera_preferences.xml
an example adb pull command to copy it to the local computer:
adb pull /data/data/com.android.camera/shared_prefs/com.android.camera_preferences.xml c:\com.android.camera_preferences.xml
i do wonder how adding time stamping to the picture would work in 3d mode ... i wonder if that presented an issue so they scrapped it ... just speculating!
joeykrim said:
i do wonder how adding time stamping to the picture would work in 3d mode ... i wonder if that presented an issue so they scrapped it ... just speculating!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya know, I never thought of that as a potential reason for leaving it out. That's probably it too, not that we could get an official answer to it though, so speculation will have to do, but I do think you have it right.
I DID hear early on in the threads that it was possible that panorama and burst mode, among other things, weren't acting right for one reason or another, and those functions were pulled right before release. Makes sense that panorama or burst wouldn't work right either in 3D, so it stands to reason.
Still though, it would've been nice to have those options for 2D pictures. It's a shame they couldn't figure out how to disable those options when the 3D switch was flipped, if any of this is really the case even. lol
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
I am hoping to find a Scanner app that will let me scan a page by literally *scanning* it with my camera, slowly sweeping the page. Similar to how you can take panoramic photos, and it stitches the images together behind the scenes. I want to use OCR to scan a page into text, but the I find the quality usually isn't good enough for accurate OCR.
Does anyone know of one? Thanks
Don't know about panorama but but did you try Camscanner? It works like a charm. Download it from the market:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.intsig.camscanner&hl=en
arafsheikh said:
Don't know about panorama but but did you try Camscanner? It works like a charm. Download it from the market:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.intsig.camscanner&hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, actually that's what I have now.
Tried emailing a scan to my laptop and my ocr program got nearly anything right, lots of random symbols.
I will try again with better lighting but, surely, there must at least be some app to stitch photos together? Where you take 3 or 4 pics and it fits them to make a seamless high quality image?
Swiped from my Rezound using xda-developers app
mvmacd said:
I am hoping to find a Scanner app that will let me scan a page by literally *scanning* it with my camera, slowly sweeping the page. Similar to how you can take panoramic photos, and it stitches the images together behind the scenes. I want to use OCR to scan a page into text, but the I find the quality usually isn't good enough for accurate OCR.
Does anyone know of one? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am too searching the same kind of functionality. Did you find something at the end?
Night on the web said:
I am too searching the same kind of functionality. Did you find something at the end?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am still missing this app ...