Is anybody working on getting the Camera from the S3 to work on our Notes? Could anbybody update me on this situation? Would LOVE to be able to use that. Would completely COMPLETE the note experience to the fullest! I take LOTS and LOTS of pictures so this is an extreme interest for me!!! (btw I looked around about it and haven't found anything much about this surprisingly)
Are you talking about a hardware swap? or are you talking about the software? and what are the differences in both? Pardon my ignorance
Sorry not to specify. The apk basically is what I am talking about to simplify it. Looking for the whole no shutter lag experience.
Sent from my Rooted Samsung Galaxy Note Running ICS 4.0.4
brandon440 said:
Sorry not to specify. The apk basically is what I am talking about to simplify it. Looking for the whole no shutter lag experience.
Sent from my Rooted Samsung Galaxy Note Running ICS 4.0.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This would be almost impossible, as it would need the Galaxy s3's hardware and framework.
If this is impossible, then is there an alternative? I just would like yo be able to snap photos faster with at least the same quality as the Note has now..
Sent from my Icy Samsung Galaxy Note...ROM-OnlyOne Goldie
icscamera+ the reason why the s3 snaps so fast is cause of the upgraded camera hardware.
drksilenc said:
icscamera+ the reason why the s3 snaps so fast is cause of the upgraded camera hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure about that? I'm pretty sure that's software related. There are plenty of apps (fast burst, camera FX, etc) that do no shutter lag and fast burst sequences.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
drksilenc said:
icscamera+ the reason why the s3 snaps so fast is cause of the upgraded camera hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. Its software related. I have this app from playstore that proves it.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
-Once you go NOTE, you'd say 4 inches a Joke
-iOS = inspiring Outdated Software
More specifically any one have a physical hardware difference list?
Basic config beside size and battery is almost identical.
Battery
Screen
Spen
Bluetooth radio?
NFC software
original firmware
camera hardware?
brandon440 said:
If this is impossible, then is there an alternative? I just would like yo be able to snap photos faster with at least the same quality as the Note has now..
Sent from my Icy Samsung Galaxy Note...ROM-OnlyOne Goldie
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your never gonna be able to do that and have the same quality photos. The faster the shutter speed is the more quality suffers but there are several apps that let you take pictures in burst but most will tell you that quality will suffer. Search "fast burst camera" in the Play Market. Also there are several videos of the Note and S3 head to head and you can see the Note takes a much better picture eventhough they both have 8MP cameras cause the shutter speed on the Note is slower which means better quality.
---------- Post added at 03:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------
SKyRocKeting727 said:
Wrong. Its software related. I have this app from playstore that proves it.
-Once you go NOTE, you'd say 4 inches a Joke
-iOS = inspiring Outdated Software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is right. The camera hardware is upgraded with a different shutter. The burst mode is software but a different shutter is used so that the photos still keep some of the quality they lose from the burst sequence and so the shutter will be consistanly opening at the same speed no matter what mode the camera is set to. Meaning the picture quality will be the same in burst sequence and normal mode, while on the Note the quality is different when taking fast burst pictures than it is when taking a normal picture.
Related
So I'm very tempted to make the jump to CM7, but I really like the Camera included with the Stock Rom. In my previous experiences with CM7, I've not been too happy with the camera app. On my Atrix 4G I installed the MIUI 1.7 Camera app and it was better but lacked FFC support and still didn't have the same quality and the stock app. So my question and request is for people to post pictures they have taken with maybe both or one of the Roms. I wanna see the differences. I would appreciate any pics! Thanks in advance.
Aosp camera
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Aosp messaging
Aosp dialer
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Thanks for the AOSP screen shots, I'm a little more interested in pictures taken with the camera apps on the 2 different Roms!
Gotcha. I sorry!
On cm7 you can't focus by pressing the screen. It only focuses on the center with the shutter button.
Also image is only wide and fills screen at 2.5 mp.
saltytostitos said:
Gotcha. I sorry!
On cm7 you can't focus by pressing the screen. It only focuses on the center with the shutter button.
Also image is only wide and fills screen at 2.5 mp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meh, Looks like i'm sticking with the stock based Roms for now. Unless the quality of the pictures it takes is close to the same!
It takes 8MP pics along with many other settings. I think it takes great clear pics and I haven't notice a difference in quality between stock camera and CM7 camera quality wise. It may not have all the same functions and the layout is different but other than the touch to focus I think it has all the settings. If you are on stock just MAKE SURE you do a nadroid backup. If you don't like CM7 you can just go back into recovery, wipe data/factory reset, restore nandroid backup of stock rom and you will be EXACTLY where you left off. It is ALOT easier going back to stock or any other roms via nandroid backup that on older captivates or sgs1's.
Brought to you by my KICKASS CM7 AT&T SGS2
re: you are right!
scoot05redss said:
So I'm very tempted to make the jump to CM7, but I really like the Camera included with the Stock Rom. In my previous experiences with CM7, I've not been too happy with the camera app. On my Atrix 4G I installed the MIUI 1.7 Camera app and it was better but lacked FFC support and still didn't have the same quality and the stock app. So my question and request is for people to post pictures they have taken with maybe both or one of the Roms. I wanna see the differences. I would appreciate any pics! Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are 100% correct about the CM7's camera user interface (UI).
Even before taking pictures or videos with it, just looking at CM7's LCD
anyone can see that CM7's user interface looks like some cheapy camera
and not something which is sopposed to be just about top of the line.
CM7 always had this issue even when I used to have the Captivate phone.
I just do not understand why some of the DEVS cannot replace the
camera's user interface with a much nicer looking one after all this time.
So far I was only commenting on the cosmetic aspects of the CM7's camera.
Now I will tell you about the quality of the actual videos and snapshots
I have done a lot of tests with.
#1: CM7 cannot record videos in 1080p HD
#2: CM7 cannot record at the full 30 fps which is very noticable.
#3: CM7 cannot do continuous auto-focus while recording videos.
Flash CyanogenMOD rom then record some videos of moving cars or people
walking or or running or you can simply put a can of pepsi in front of the
phone about 3 feet from the camera lens on a table or something while
moving the phone left to right, right to left, up and down while focusing in
on the can of pepsi on a table.
Do this for a couple minutes and you will see exactly what I am talking
about. Then do this same test using the STOCK GB rom and you will see
a day and night difference in the two recordings quality.
CM7 only records at approx. 15 to 21fps constantly changing rates making
the recordings look jerky and unprofessional unless you are recording
stationary objects or people who are are just sitting on a chair talking but
with little motion or movement.
One other thing, when taking snapshots with CM7 rom the auto focus takes
about twice as long for it to lock onto anything you are taking pictures of.
These are the main reasons I have not taken the Cyanogen route yet.
I really do like most all other aspects of the CyanogenMOD rom a lot
but until all the camera issues have been fixed I will simply stick with
GTG's "noname" custom rom which after much testing I find to be the
best and the most reliable custom rom which is availble for our phones
at this time.
After all, the camera part in any cell phone is one of it's highest selling
points especially for people like myself who love photograpy.
I hope all this info has helped you and other's too.
Awesome info! It helps tremendously. I've found the Unnamed Rom to be the best so far as well. Looks like ill stick with it.
Sent from my Galaxy S II using the XDA app!
http://www.samsungmobilepress.com/2012/02/27/GALAXY-S-WiFi-4.2
The only reason I can see for this is to avoid Apple's lawsuits by changing styling. Our galaxy players are apart of their latest lawsuit, btw. They did the same thing with the galaxy tab 10.1 2.
I see multiple signs of hardware cuts, but no signs of upgrades, other than possibly ICS. This is apparently Samsung's idea of a sequel.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specs we know so far:
512mb of ram
1ghz OMAP4 CPU
4.2" 480x800 lcd screen
124.1 x66.1 x 8.9 mm dimensions
1500mah battery
2.0 rear, 0.3 front facing camera
Ships with 2.3, "eventual" update to 4.0
Has a 6-axis gyroscope
Comes in 8gb or 16gb
"Gamer oriented" (comes with nfs; hot pursuit)
Releases in Mach (probably only Korea, other markets later?)
*Much of this info came from third party sites, and may not be accurate*
Meh the specs are about the same or even worse than the current Players. I do like the EA Games preloaded app if it's really what it is.
I'm not impressed by this, but didn't know about it either. So thanks for sharing :]
My thoughts exactly; very unimpressive!
Hmm I might get this instead of a 4.0.
I will thank as soon as I get 10 posts, lol!
http://mobile.pcmag.com/device2/art.../www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400827,00.asp
Well, according to this the proccesor is "a bit" more powerful than the 4.0's, it has a 6-axis gyroscope, and it will "eventually" get ICS. Now that last part is pretty tempting, IF Samsung ever gets around to it!
Now what on earth is downgrading the camera to 2mp all about?!
The picture looks like it's running touchwiz 4.0 though.
" eventually " , so probably upgradable using samsung kies. But that means the 4.0 and 5.0 will also have ics in the future?
But it will probably take ages...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Hmm, idk. Maybe, but the ics is about the only difference it would have, so giving it to the older generation would be kinda redundant. Hope they do, though
You're right about the touchwiz 4.0, could be a sure sign that ICS is coming, or could be nothing. An advertising pic they used for the old Galaxy S Wifi 50 (no, not 5.0) used a screenshot from an iPhone, so don't judge a Samsung device by it's picture, lol!
The real difference is the IPS panel!
4.2” WVGA(480×800) IPS TFT
IPS doesn't seem that important, since the viewing angle of the 4.0 is already great.
Seem more like the color change. Hardware are similar/abit better than the galaxy 4.0
iJimaniac said:
IPS doesn't seem that important, since the viewing angle of the 4.0 is already great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IPS is not only viewing angle, but better contrast, better colors, cleaner glass screen (G70 is plastic).
Have you ever seen the difference between iphone (IPS) and ipod touch (glass but non IPS)?
They took all the fun out of it im going to stick with my 5.O
Sent From My SGP 5.O
Only reason I got the Galaxy S wi-fi 4.0 was for its built in Wolfson DAC and Steve's custom kernels which made voodoo sound possible so I am not really interested in the SGS 4.2 besides it more or less has the same spec and probably doesn't have the SGS 4.0's Wolfson DAC.
The specs do not indicate whether the newer device has GPS?.. for me, one of the compelling arguments for these devices is their use as a standalone car navigation system using offline maps/routing with apps such as co-pilot live.
Makes me glad I already have a 5.0.. The white is kinda cool though. Also interesting to see in the picture that it's branded as a "Galaxy S".
Seems meh though.
Q: Does Galaxy player 5.0 Intl. (YP-G70CW) come with gyroscope?
ICS "eventually" with Samsung means never... If you want ICS wait until this is released with it - if it ever is.
1776 said:
ICS "eventually" with Samsung means never... If you want ICS wait until this is released with it - if it ever is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not really an accurate statement. Samsung is currently working on ICS Ports for many of their devices. Hopefully JellyBean will be postponed until next years devices roll out so at least current candidates can get ICS.
So is there going to be a new upcoming model of the Galaxy Player 5.0?
Sent from my YP-G70 using XDA
Did someone found a difference in sharpness and noise(high ISO) between AOSP and Stock based roms? I have the sensation of some kind of blurred images when i use AOSP ...
Thanks!
stock camera takes better images, yes
images will blur if you've not got a steady hand. Its more apparent to me on aosp cameras
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Stock Camera shoots better videos, audio quality is defenatly better, but also pics quality
Hmm disagree there. Yes, the stock AOSP maybe, but once you use the modded one with ultrapixel, you'll wonder why everyone thinks the Sammy camera is better (until you get into low light or if you have Parkinsons or something)
rootSU said:
Hmm disagree there. Yes, the stock AOSP maybe, but once you use the modded one with ultrapixel, you'll wonder why everyone thinks the Sammy camera is better (until you get into low light or if you have Parkinsons or something)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the ultrapixel mod ? http://mobility.forumsee.com/a/m/s/...-ultrapixel-any-phone-camera-code-posted.html
Thank you
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1746611
[APP][MOD] SIII AOSP Camera v2.60
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
rootSU said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1746611
[APP][MOD] SIII AOSP Camera v2.60
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! :good:
There are literally no bad cameras, AOSP or not, only bad photographers. I mean, the One doesn't have the best camera around but there are some awesome shots to be taken with it, if you're a master photographer.
All phone cameras have their own issues. Its hardware mainly. Compare the s3 camera to almost any dedicated compact of the same "on paper" specs and you'll see.
Oems just can't afford to make the phone camera that good. With the S3, its low light. With the Xperia T its the flash....
That said, you can get some good shots with them. Its just the tolerance on the perfect conditions is much smaller than a compact.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Newbiee question.
Does the use of 3º party software changes anything?
I say this because i use for photos "Camera FV-5" software...and i think is sometimes much better than stock one (at least has more options).
Using Last Sentinel Rom.
Tks.
Mord0rr said:
Newbiee question.
Does the use of 3º party software changes anything?
I say this because i use for photos "Camera FV-5" software...and i think is sometimes much better than stock one (at least has more options).
Using Last Sentinel Rom.
Tks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It uses all the existing drivers and libraries for the device, but often a different app can bring additional / different functionality with it.
Comparison
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock (Camera_HX-MOD_1.52-100%-automatic ISO)
AOSP (Ultrapixel-100%-automatic ISO)
Colors and constrast were edited in Capture NX2 in the automatic mode.
Same focal point and 8MP on both pictures.
Theshawty said:
There are literally no bad cameras, AOSP or not, only bad photographers. I mean, the One doesn't have the best camera around but there are some awesome shots to be taken with it, if you're a master photographer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all, my friend. A bad camera (and bad lenses) can ruin a good photo, for example :chromatic aberration and moiré... But i agree about who is working with the camera...
victorreis777 said:
Not at all, my friend. A bad camera (and bad lenses) can ruin a good photo, for example :chromatic aberration and moiré... But i agree about who is working with the camera...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im a litle confuse here.....
So, since i use a AOSP ROM (Liquid Smooth 2.5) and a 3º party software, i have worse photos than original ROM?
Apart the photographer detail, is this correct?
Mord0rr said:
Im a litle confuse here.....
So, since i use a AOSP ROM (Liquid Smooth 2.5) and a 3º party software, i have worse photos than original ROM?
Apart the photographer detail, is this correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I Love SlimKat and SOKP (also CM11 with my previous phone), BUT the picture quality is worse compared to stock sammy roms. Fully working HDR mode is not easy in AOKP roms.
Hello everybody,
Can you please tell me which custom ROM I should install to get the best camera (photos&videos) experience?
I´m running LiquidSmooth right now and although I have great battery and high customisation, photos and videos aren´t really that great, specially comparing to the original Samsung ROM the phone came with.
Can you please help suggesting me some other options?
Thank you all!
Like my note 7 had so many features , such as place phone face down to silence call. Or keep phone screen on by looking at it etc. This phone just seems really barebones. Even tho it's very snappy. I think when note 8 comes around I'll switch. I wish I could get those aforementioned features
girn26 said:
Like my note 7 had so many features , such as place phone face down to silence call. Or keep phone screen on by looking at it etc. This phone just seems really barebones. Even tho it's very snappy. I think when note 8 comes around I'll switch. I wish I could get those aforementioned features
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U really had to start a new thread for this? I'm guessing since the Note 7 recall, this was your only choice?
coremark said:
U really had to start a new thread for this? I'm guessing since the Note 7 recall, this was your only choice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note 7 is good for a stranded person in the middle of the woods. Bam camp fire!
Sent from my LGE LG-H830 using XDA Labs
G5 is also packed with features and you can also silence the call when you place the phone face down ..just sayin...
Note 7 was a great device though..
(Especially during the winter)
Sent from my LG-H850 using Insomdroid
drmilosh said:
G5 is also packed with features and you can also silence the call when you place the phone face down ..just sayin...
Note 7 was a great device though..
(Especially during the winter)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ (Especially during winter) lmao
Sent from my LGE LG-H830 using XDA Labs
I like the Lg G5 massively over the note 7 just for the wide angle camera alone. Keeping the phone screen on while looking at it is possibly the worst gimmick ever.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I wish it did have the screen stay on feature when watching a video on Facebook or whatnot where you gotta move the screen once in a while to stop it from dimming. Yeah the note 7 was a failure and it also was a slow phone (Snapdragon model) but this phone having the same chip runs a lot better. Must be better optimized. The note 7 cam does beat the main cam on this phone tho, it also took HDR pics super fast. Pros and cons to everything.
girn26 said:
I wish it did have the screen stay on feature when watching a video on Facebook or whatnot where you gotta move the screen once in a while to stop it from dimming. Yeah the note 7 was a failure and it also was a slow phone (Snapdragon model) but this phone having the same chip runs a lot better. Must be better optimized. The note 7 cam does beat the main cam on this phone tho, it also took HDR pics super fast. Pros and cons to everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree.
For that screen on feature just use this
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teqtic.kinscreen
Problems solved, thank me later..
Sent from my LG-H850 using Insomdroid
No, I love the G5
Let's get this clear the G5 has the face down silence option, and if it's packed with features, u just have to look for them in the settings, and beside all that the wide angle lens is the most innovative camera feature ever on a smartphone, what would u do if u had a pixel ?
Coming from Motorola, Lenovo, and Huawei phones, and just looking at stock settings on the G5, I'm pretty impressed by what LG included. Just to be able to change global font and theme without root would've been revolutionary to me not that long ago. Granted, the LG store is relatively young/limited -and I've no idea where it will go- but it's a promising starting point. 360 wideangle live wallpaper with wideangle camera lens to make your own (eventually), drag-and-drop touch button settings, multiwindow, shortcut key commands, as small a detail as battery percentage preference... Many of these things we're used to as root mods, and in that sense they may be boring, but to have them as part of the stock basis makes me look forward to expansions of customization in the not-too-distant future, if not by LG in their store, then by the enthusiasts in this realm. It's encouraging, far from boring!
I OWN a Sony Xperia z3+ dual and never appreciated it till I bought this phone, despite mixed reviews on the Sony, the camera on it is miles ahead of the Galaxy A5 2017. It's a shame, this Phones ticks a lot of boxes. It's great to hold, a "battery beast" all day battery with a lot of surfing, nice screen, after my personal set up complete nice to use. I put on two camera apps that take better pics and add stabilization which for some reason is missing, open camera and camera MX
It's an 8/10 phone and would be a 9.5/10 if Samsung updates camera
Same, most of the time my photos captured from the stock camera is blurred so I use open camera which really stabilizes the shot but takes a little longer to capture a photo.
Just got my A5.17, is this "Open Camera" the one by Mark Harman?
After a week I found 3 camera apps that work better, best all around is open camera I set the stabilization for video and its pretty good, next is camera mx followed by camera fv-5, all seem decent. I found out that since this flashed UAE firmware that Samsung pay does not work but Android pay installs. Don't care too much since I do not like paying with phone except Starbucks. The battery is a beast and I'm getting over 10hours with continuous surfing and use. The screen is nice and bright, no real lagging with my use, hot spot works great. Swift key works as native on it.
Pretty happy overall.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
No matter the Camera program the video shakes, why would samsung make such a great phone with a major flaw? I'M at a loss on this, flaming exploding phones and now phones that cannot shoot decent video. My Sony z3+ shoots nice and jitter free video, this phone has beautiful video that jitters no matter how still you hold it, even on hard surfaces. It can produce decent pictures
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Sample pics with open camera
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Another
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Trig0r said:
Just got my A5.17, is this "Open Camera" the one by Mark Harman?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it's ad free and open source
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
The camera 2 API settings do not work right with open camera I have experienced extreme white out with trying to take pics with it on.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Another Puerto Rico pic (Naguabo) all pics on open camera A5 2017
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
New topic on use here crashes, this thing crashes more than Windows Vista did. My Sony Z3 + dual is my comparison on marshmallow and with same apps no crashing, what's different? Has to be the TouchWiz software, I am beginning to believe it's crap
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
WHUDS1 said:
New topic on use here crashes, this thing crashes more than Windows Vista did. My Sony Z3 + dual is my comparison on marshmallow and with same apps no crashing, what's different? Has to be the TouchWiz software, I am beginning to believe it's crap
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont have crash issues mate :good:
Ok it may be one of my apps with TouchWiz,
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
I do not have samsung pay app on phone and I'm wondering if it's because the firmware is UAE
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
OK still experiencing problems with Crashes and restarts, its random, but it does seem worse when I'm Hot spotting, I need the hot spot since it will be internet source for the next 1.5 to 2 years
I'm wondering what is happening? My sony Z3+ with Marshmallow and same apps does not do this at all... could it be something with the Samsung software?
Open Camera is great.
What about AnTuTu scores.
I bought the A5 2 weeks ago. So far so good, battery is so amazing that I can use this phone 1,5 days on normal usage without charge. :good:
Tried so many big games and no lags on it. Very smooth
I hope this phone will get android nougat soon!