I am on the latest milestone 6 rom, and also the latest devil kernal. What is the clockspeed I should set it at, and also which governor works best?
Solidsnake726 said:
I am on the latest milestone 6 rom, and also the latest devil kernal. What is the clockspeed I should set it at, and also which governor works best?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use 1200 MHz cpu speed, 105% liveoc, vr i/o scheduler and lulzactive governor. smooth and stable. though liveoc can be raised
reidandkat said:
I use 1200 MHz cpu speed, 105% liveoc, vr i/o scheduler and lulzactive governor. smooth and stable. though liveoc can be raised
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how about the battery performance ?
Related
guys simple question that needs and answer , what are the best I/O scheduler and Governor in terms of raw speed performance ?
i'm using night-elf kernel v8.5 and this kernel have plenty of them....
Personally I use I/O SIO, by far the fastest. And if you want a good battery and performance use lagfree.
Ondemand as also good values in performance.
Theres a thread that explains you all the schedulers and governors.
For benchmark use sio and performance governor. Just for the show.
The link to the trhead.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443731
Regards.
ok i'm finally set for I/O = SIO , Governor = smartassV2
the UI feels so much more smoother than before , my default was noob and ondemand
As title says, what is the best setting to be chosen?kindly brief the detail coz im newbie
Sent from my SK17i using XDA
Well it depends on taste and kernel support but for me the best will be interactivex as governor and sio as I/o scheduler, it gives you no lags and good battery life.
i installed x kernel v4, did not have to change the cpu governor or i/o.
i only install nofrills to do benchmark, then removed it afterwards.
best battery life ever on hybrom v16
i think it uses ondemand for cpu, not sure wether it uses noop or deadline for i/o
i am currently testing smartassV2 cpu governor with simple i/o scheduler on krsh3 kernel
so far battery time is better with these settings than the default ondemand governor
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817
I am S-On running Shrike's PAC cm10 rom with his latest Erhmagad kernel set to lionheart governer and ROW i/o scheduler. My min CPU frequency is 192 MHz and my max is 1404 MHz but im still only getting decent battery life.
What are the optimal CPU settings for someone who uses their phone primarly for text messaging, youtube, emails, browsing the web, etc. I don't really do much power gaming. I heard on some thread that there is no power usage difference between 192 and 384 MHz is this true?
im using funky kernel 2.2 and im also interested in what are some good settings to start out with...
gleggie said:
I am S-On running Shrike's PAC cm10 rom with his latest Erhmagad kernel set to lionheart governer and ROW i/o scheduler. My min CPU frequency is 192 MHz and my max is 1404 MHz but im still only getting decent battery life.
What are the optimal CPU settings for someone who uses their phone primarly for text messaging, youtube, emails, browsing the web, etc. I don't really do much power gaming. I heard on some thread that there is no power usage difference between 192 and 384 MHz is this true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found 384 to be better than 192. At least on my phone.
Does lion heart run better then snartass v2?
Sent from my LG-E739 using xda app-developers app
gleggie said:
I am S-On running Shrike's PAC cm10 rom with his latest Erhmagad kernel set to lionheart governer and ROW i/o scheduler. My min CPU frequency is 192 MHz and my max is 1404 MHz but im still only getting decent battery life.
What are the optimal CPU settings for someone who uses their phone primarly for text messaging, youtube, emails, browsing the web, etc. I don't really do much power gaming. I heard on some thread that there is no power usage difference between 192 and 384 MHz is this true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The difference is almost negligible, and at 384MHz, things can finish up their work faster and get back to deep sleep faster. In general though, like so many other things it depends a lot on your individual usage pattern.
kdog1202 said:
Does lion heart run better then snartass v2?
Sent from my LG-E739 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're very different in how they work so it's hard to even do a direct comparison. smartassV2 is based on the interactive governor and does a lot of "fast-peaking" where it jumps to high frequencies more quickly and more often. Lionheart is conservative based, so it moves through the individual frequencies more smoothly, but it doesn't increase as quickly. I've tested smartassV2 in my kernel, but haven't pushed it in an official update yet, because I haven't gotten it tuned to a point where I'm happy with it. For my use, I've found lionheart to be quite smooth and pretty easy on battery.
If you want some comparison, dancedance is probably the closest thing to lionheart in Funky Kernel, but dancedance scales a bit different and has some different sleep routines, so it acts a little different under light load.
I've read that pegasusq should be aware of multi-core CPUs and should be able to deactivate not-needed cores.
But, on SGS2 a lot of people keeps using ondemand. Even CM keeps ondemand as default scheduler.
Is ondemand still better option as maybe it is better to run one core at 200MHz using ondemand then one core at 500MHz using pegasusq... ?
tnttrx said:
I've read that pegasusq should be aware of multi-core CPUs and should be able to deactivate not-needed cores.
But, on SGS2 a lot of people keeps using ondemand. Even CM keeps ondemand as default scheduler.
Is ondemand still better option as maybe it is better to run one core at 200MHz using ondemand then one core at 500MHz using pegasusq... ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This could be helpful.
Please search next time as I just typed "ondemand vs pegasusq" into the search bar.
kilometers4 said:
This could be helpful.
Please search next time as I just typed "ondemand vs pegasusq" into the search bar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thx for pointing out, but in that thread I've just found things that I already mentioned: pegasusq is made for multi-cores and it has integrated hotplug.
unfortunately, I had no chance to find any real-world use comparison of pegasusq and ondemand (or other schedulers) regarding power consumption nor responsiveness.
tnttrx said:
thx for pointing out, but in that thread I've just found things that I already mentioned: pegasusq is made for multi-cores and it has integrated hotplug.
unfortunately, I had no chance to find any real-world use comparison of pegasusq and ondemand (or other schedulers) regarding power consumption nor responsiveness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pegasusq in my opinion is the better governor to use, largely because it can tell if is more than one core and respond accordingly. Pair that with CPU Sleeper Dual Core and you're golden as far as power saving awareness. SIO I hear is the best i/o scheduler to use for power consumption, deadline in my opinion is the best for pure performance however be careful because If you do overload and a process misses a deadline it will hiccup or even freeze.
Hey
After I rooted (and reflashed) my Z5C, I noticed that the battery was draining very quickly. Then I found out that it had been running on max frequency w/ the performance governor. So I wanted to ask if anyone knows the default/stock frequency, governor and scheduler? And for some reason it sets itself to performance and on the highest frequency so I have to set it manually apparently...
Kernel auditor can possibly help