[Q] MagicWhite technology's magic potential? - Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go

XP owners have the brightest screen on the market (867 cd/m²).
Other phones are nowhere near this (Iphone4s 485, onex 450, sii 256, gnex 135) and all this is, thanks to the MagicWhite technology. But XP is criticized for it's poor blacks.
I don't have detailed knowledge about what i'm going to yammer about. But stick with me, it might become interesting.
With LED backlit screens, it is theoretically possible to have very high contrast ratios. Cause unlike CCFL screens you have a white LED behind each pixel and if the hardware design allows you to get a reference to each backlight LED, you should be able to control the backlight for each pixel and have them turned off behind black pixels and maximize their brightness behind the white ones. something like what you get with SuperAMOLED screens.
Pros probably answer that we don't have access to each subpixel on the backlight panel. But with WhiteMagic it has to be different. cause it's not just a panel of LEDs all of which have to have the same amount of brightness. It's a fourth subpixel in the main panel if i'm not misunderstood by Sony saying "WhiteMagic adds a 4th white sub-pixel – traditional LCD screens have three; red, green and blue – to the Reality Display."
So?
So we must be able to have great blacks. It seems to me when i maximize my brightness, that blacks also get a lot brighter. When the fourth white subpixel must be used only for making pixels brighter considering the amount of brightness they already have.
This is probably a modification in the kernel layer.
Pictures might make it more interesting for noobs like me:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You can see that backlight layer here doesn't have a static brightness per pixel. There are four masks being presented to the screen here: Red layer, green layer, blue layer and last but not least the white layer. Although this just demonstrates what i said about any LED backlit display. There's a lot more than this to our MagicWhite display.
p.s sorry if my english doesn't feel english.

Poor blacks on any LCD is the result of light passing trough crystals. In addition to that Sony opened another hole for light to pass, so maybe that is a reason why you have poor blacks.

ljubanve said:
Poor blacks on any LCD is the result of light passing trough crystals. In addition to that Sony opened another hole for light to pass, so maybe that is a reason why you have poor blacks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
partialy true. there are multiple reasons we're not getting a black black.
there is this gap between the glass and the lcd panel that causes reflection. this is solved in xperia z.
there could be other polarizing layers to reduce reflection. like what we have in Nokia's Clear Black LCD Displays. they offer blacks like sAMOLED blacks.
but that is all hardware stuff and there's nothing we can do about it.
i'm talking about what could probably be done with the hardware that is already in our hands.

Correction !!!
There wont be each white LED behind each pixel in LED backlit LCD's , for whole LCD there will be 8 ,9 .... White LED's.
to understand clearly look at this edge LED's in LCD
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...cklight.JPG/800px-IPod_Touch_2G_Backlight.JPG
but in Xperia p LCD WhiteMagic there is a fourth subpixel in the main panel . because of this the white dominates the whole and decreases the contrast whereas in ordinary Backlit LED LCD the white LED's is behind LCD panel , i think
for more info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED-backlit_LCD_display

shuhail said:
Correction !!!
There wont be each white LED behind each pixel in LED backlit LCD's , for whole LCD there will be 8 ,9 .... White LED's.
to understand clearly look at this edge LED's in LCD
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...cklight.JPG/800px-IPod_Touch_2G_Backlight.JPG
but in Xperia p LCD WhiteMagic there is a fourth subpixel in the main panel . because of this the white dominates the whole and decreases the contrast whereas in ordinary Backlit LED LCD the white LED's is behind LCD panel , i think
for more info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED-backlit_LCD_display
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Objection !!!
Wikipedia said:
Three types of LED may be used:
- White-edge LEDs around the rim of the screen, using a special diffusion panel to spread the light evenly behind the screen (the most common use)
- LED array behind the screen, whose brightness is not controlled individually
- Dynamic “local dimming” array of LEDs, controlled individually (or in clusters) to achieve a modulated backlight pattern
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and you are talking only about the first type.

And none of them have LED for each pixel.
http://developer.sonymobile.com/2012/02/27/introducing-whitemagic-the-technology-in-xperia-p/

safir187 said:
Objection !!!
and you are talking only about the first type.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Talking about all 3

ok it's not an led per pixel but it's not 8 or 9 leds in all three types.
anyway, f*&$ backlit led screens! i didn't say LED Backlit's LED potential, i said MagicWhite technology's magic potential, and i guess we all agree that there's a white subpixel per pixel in this type of display.
so let's not be off topic. i just think the blacks shouldn't be this bright with the brightness maximized if it's a result of that fourth subpixel.

Related

Question about the "Top Battery Consumers" screen

I have a question regarding this screen:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
When it says that Display = 34%, does it means that display was used 34% of the 20 hours and 31 minutes that the device was on battery, or does it means that Display used 34% of the battery ?
If the latter is correct, how can I know how much time the display was ON during a certain discharge period ?
Thanks !
BATTERY TOTAL DISCHARGED OR TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHARGE USED.
Say battery in those 20 hours has used 20% of its total charge .
Readings show of that 20% display has used 34% of the total charged used .
jje
The percentage shows the share of battery CHARGE consumed by the screen. To see how many actual hours your screen was actually on, just tap on that line of information.
Is this what you were asking?
kreoXDA said:
The percentage shows the share of battery CHARGE consumed by the screen. To see how many actual hours your screen was actually on, just tap on that line of information.
Is this what you were asking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's exactly what I've asked for. Thanks!
Wow now that I see my screen time it's unbelievable. It was ON just 1 hour and 50 minutes, and I'm down at 25% battery. I don't understand how people say they get 4-5 hours of screen time...
Probably because they don't have "talk box". No idea what it is or does but it (probably) drains your battery way to much.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
OP, we get good display time and decent battery life if we use lowest brightness and carefully watch what apps we install and how we use them. Plus you need to have good coverage so your phone is not constantly looking for better signal.
See a couple of my old screen shots attached.
kreoXDA said:
OP, we get good display time and decent battery life if we use lowest brightness and carefully watch what apps we install and how we use them. Plus you need to have good coverage so your phone is not constantly looking for better signal.
See a couple of my old screen shots attached.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you use screen brightness constantly on lower setting ?, but I didn't have to do it with older phones, I don't understand why I need to do it with OLED screen which suppose to be energy efficient.
Noam23 said:
So you use screen brightness constantly on lower setting ?, but I didn't have to do it with older phones, I don't understand why I need to do it with OLED screen which suppose to be energy efficient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
energy efficiency is marketing gimmick. most people in the know like OLED only because of colors.
Samsung CAN EASILY confirm energy efficiency claim by comparing the screen to a run-of-the-mill LCD by having both screens displaying a 100% black image. OLED would be sipping power in this mode, while LCD will be gobbling the up (relatively speaking).
If you make the two screens show WHITE image, OLED will eat n-times more power than LCD.
In average use, displaying darker images on half-brightness, LCD eats more than OLED.
The brighter your OLED is, the more power it eats, because the brightness/light is produced by the PIXELS and they want power to shine brighter.
LCD - the light is not produced by the pixels themselves, it is coming form a single backlight behind the screen. So no matter what image the screen displays, black or white, the backlight still eats the same power.
Make sure you decrease brightness in the browser, set background to BLACK in book reader apps, set darker backgrounds for the home screens, etc. In general avoid having the screen on full brightness. That also helps with potential image burn in.
I use full brightness only when I am outside.
kreoXDA said:
energy efficiency is marketing gimmick. most people in the know like OLED only because of colors.
Samsung CAN EASILY confirm energy efficiency claim by comparing the screen to a run-of-the-mill LCD by having both screens displaying a 100% black image. OLED would be sipping power in this mode, while LCD will be gobbling the up (relatively speaking).
If you make the two screens show WHITE image, OLED will eat n-times more power than LCD.
In average use, displaying darker images on half-brightness, LCD eats more than OLED.
The brighter your OLED is, the more power it eats, because the brightness/light is produced by the PIXELS and they want power to shine brighter.
LCD - the light is not produced by the pixels themselves, it is coming form a single backlight behind the screen. So no matter what image the screen displays, black or white, the backlight still eats the same power.
Make sure you decrease brightness in the browser, set background to BLACK in book reader apps, set darker backgrounds for the home screens, etc. In general avoid having the screen on full brightness. That also helps with potential image burn in.
I use full brightness only when I am outside.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I actually use Auto brightness. Isn't this good option ?
Noam23 said:
So you use screen brightness constantly on lower setting ?, but I didn't have to do it with older phones, I don't understand why I need to do it with OLED screen which suppose to be energy efficient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah dont fall for the marketing lies. AMOLED screens in my opinion use way MORE power than LCD screens. sure black color is where it saves power, but in virtually no place do we ever see black backgrounds. we see white web pages 99.99999% of the time using our phones. so the savings of OLED are useless.
Noam23 said:
Well, I actually use Auto brightness. Isn't this good option ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think autobrightness is decent - but I prefer to have more control of my brightness, because I do not like it jumping up and down depending on my position in the same chair or couch.
I like constant backlight, and I adjust it manually using that status bar trick (tap and hold on the top of the screen, where the status bar is, and then move your finger left or right on an "invisible slider" to adjust brightness).
In MOST indoor situations, lowest brightness is just perfect for me.
Sometimes it is even too much. For example when I walk home at night, and I get an email, I read it for a seocnd while walking, and then I look back at my path and I can't see well for a couple of seconds, because the phone light blinded me
We definitely needs some oled friendly browsers ,watching a movie on the S2 is just a joy, no backlight bleeding

Xperia Z Ultra - Display comparisons

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hi to everyone,
finally we got it! As you know Sony equipped our Ultra with a great-looking as well as innovative 6.44” HD TRILUMINOS Display with X-Reality but... how it shows?
TRILUMINOS is Sony's exclusive new technology that allows for far greater color tones and textures to be displayed on the screen. In simple terms you could think of TRILUMINOS as simply a bigger box of color pencils to draw an image on the screen. A conventional display only has a limited box of color pencils to draw an image, whereas a TRILUMINOS display has a bigger box of color pencils with more shades of Blue, Red and Green color pencils.
As a result a TRILUMINOS display can reproduce more natural colors thanks to the expanded color gamut and display various shades of colors closer to reality than a conventional display. A TRILUMINOS display can output true, natural shades of colours – like hard-to-reproduce reds, greens and blues. Faces look better, too, with rich, lifelike skin tones
How does it work?
TRILUMINOS is basically a filter that is placed between the White LED backlighting and the display panel. This means that the White LED backlight is now turned into RGB backlight which is what allows Sony TRILUMINOS displays to show a wider range of colors. Traditionally RGB LED backlighting is much more expensive to implement whereas TRILUMINOS filter is cheaper to implement and provides the same benefits.
Along with a boost in color gamut, TRILUMINOS filter also boosts the contrast and viewing angles.
(topic under construction...)
Let's start!
Here's my first comparison: Ultra Z vs Samsung S4. Images and videos from my BlackBerry Z10, leaked firmware 10.2.0.1047.
Sony xPeria Ultra Z vs Samsung S4 (Setup: Display MAX, Closed rood, Night)
Seems a little hard to distinguish in some of the shots but the amoled is really nice overall
On very high pixel per inch screen, ~440 on S4(and another full-HD 5" phones), in term of sharpness LCD is superior to Samsung AMOLED as I still can distinguish some pixel color abnormally on AMOLED but not on LCD.
In term of color AMOLED is still the best.
GOF007 said:
On very high pixel per inch screen, ~440 on S4(and another full-HD 5" phones), in term of sharpness LCD is superior to Samsung AMOLED as I still can distinguish some pixel color abnormally on AMOLED but not on LCD.
In term of color AMOLED is still the best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I do agree, Sony did a great job but the black (S4) is really like the old-school Pioneer Kuro.
Here are a couple of my pics about the display
sev7en said:
Yes, I do agree, Sony did a great job but the black (S4) is really like the old-school Pioneer Kuro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have my Z ultra next to the Z and the Galaxy S4 Active.
Hardcore73 said:
I have my Z ultra next to the Z and the Galaxy S4 Active.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Hardcore, what's your opinion?
How about a white level comparison? The main reason I pick LCD over AMOLED is its superior white level. Would you be able to show us a comparison?
schecter7 said:
How about a white level comparison? The main reason I pick LCD over AMOLED is its superior white level. Would you be able to show us a comparison?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I will make some snaps today.
Cheers
And Sony hasn't even yet released the xreality engine which will enable the full use of the triluminos!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2

Color saturation & accuracy

If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Screen and color's are great! Only whites aren't really white, they are yellowish.
JeffreyNijnatten said:
Screen and color's are great! Only whites aren't really white, they are yellowish.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My G935F too. It has a little bit yellowish display. I hope Samsung to fix this issue soon
It's an amoled screen, don't think there's much they can do. There's pros and cons to amoled screens just like there's to LCD screens
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Whites are a bit yellowish. Looks weird and terrible compared to the screen on my One Plus One which shows true whites and highly accurate colors. Guess will have to live with it since this isn't device specific at my location.
very nice screen and color. white is great color.
On adaptive mode the whites are pretty white (maybe on the bluish side) but the colors are too vibrant. I'm on photo mode and the whites are very warm. Im seeing a brownish orange tint to the whites.
well
well
Cryosx said:
On adaptive mode the whites are pretty white (maybe on the bluish side) but the colors are too vibrant. I'm on photo mode and the whites are very warm. Im seeing a brownish orange tint to the whites.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly and I don't mind my whites being a bit bluish, like my laundry.
On a Basic mode, the white are warmer (I dont really mind that since it soft on the eyes) than the other modes but the color accuracy are so accurate!
With screen mode set to Amoled Photo it's very accurate.
(I'm a professional photographer so am comparing the colour and white balance representation to my calibrated monitor).
Mubble said:
With screen mode set to Amoled Photo it's very accurate.
(I'm a professional photographer so am comparing the colour and white balance representation to my calibrated monitor).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think 'photo mode' complies with the sRGB spectrum which still oversaturates colours compared to RGB. - If you do photo work and need pin point accuracy with this mode it is about as good as it gets.
For normal use however the 'Basic' mode has been tuned to almost 100% accuracy.
I agree that whites, especially at lower brightness levels, have a yellowish tint to them.
Unfortunately Samsung, in their pursuit for 'technical perfection' (total colour accuracy ... which this model comes closer to than any other phone screen on the market at present) have not included any other white balance adjustment, just the four presets. Not good.
Even my Elephone P9000, a superb phone for the money, has much more elaborate controls in form of Mira Vision/Mediatek which lets me adjust many parameters, including white balance, which are unaccessible in my S7E.
I have read that in the current beta version of Android N there is indeed built-in white balance adjustments which would go a long way to eleviate this issue. Whether this will make it to Android N final version is an altogether different question.
Furthermore, even if it does, Samsung are not exactly the quickest adopters of Android upgrades so it could be some time until we see this on an S7/Edge.
Rooting seems to be the only option to get white balance adjustment.
Samsung, if you read this, please include colour sliders/white balance adjustment with your next upgrade. - Many, many thanks.
In most other aspects, this phone is superb.
I understand why some people may want white balance adjustment, but understand that the white point in basic mode is what true white is supposed to be. Bluish whites that many people prefer are color inaccurate. Giving a way to adjust white balance within the modes makes sense, but I certainly wouldn't want the bluish whites that are found within Adaptive Display and AMOLED Cinema to make their way over to AMOLED Photo and Basic modes, because then the insane possible color accuracy of these screens is out the window.
Cinema and Adaptive are bluish colors, which is better for me since i don't like the yellowish colors of Photo and Basic.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How uniform are whites?
samven582 said:
How uniform are whites?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can only speak for my phone but screen uniformity is perfect.
Use LightManager from the app store if whites are to warm.
drummerman said:
I can only speak for my phone but screen uniformity is perfect.
Use LightManager from the app store if whites are to warm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank! Which color did you buy?
samven582 said:
Thank! Which color did you buy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Platinum Gold
Luvely ...
Do you guys put much faith in Display Mate's website?
For what it's worth, I prefer AMOLED Photo mode because Basic just felt a little too drab when I tried it for a few days, and Adaptive is obviously way too saturated.
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have never understood the gigantic deal some make about color accuracy. it's not like most people can even tell when the colors are slightly off. it's just something that grossly extremist of color can snarl and blow steam about. i have always preferred the punchy colors of the samsung displays, and although most of the time the colors are not 100% accurate, they are so close as to not make any difference to the 99.9% of the rest of us.

Xperia Z5C LED Light doesn't mix colors

I bought a Z5C (E5823) from ebay a month ago.
I had a Z3C before and I noticed that the Z3C LED light is much more well made. Initially the Z5C LED is brighter, which initially I thought it was nice. Upon closer inspection, it seems that the Z5C is missing some kind of film or something that the Z3C one has. I can see the individual RGB LEDs inside the opening of the LED light.
You can clearly see in the images that the LED in fact shows the three colors separated. It looks like a venn diagram, with the intended color in the middle. This causes the LED to not display the colors correctly, except full red, green or blue, when only one LED is on.
First, the Z3C pictures. Full frontal and casting the light on a white wall:
Purple (full red and blue)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Yellow (full green and red )
White (full red, green, and blue)
Now the Z5C. Full frontal and casting the light on a white wall:
Purple (full red and blue)
Yellow (full green and red )
White (full red, green, and blue)
Notice that the full frontal pics do not represent the actual color to be portrayed. It actually depends on the angle you look into the hole. Also note the complete color separation into RGB circles.
Did I get a lemon? Or is this "normal"?
Definitely not normal.
Mine does the same thing. Not an issue, but I noticed it.
michuroztocz said:
Mine does the same thing. Not an issue, but I noticed it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yours looks like it has the same "film" or something the Z3C has. It's like an opaque plastic membrane that mixes the colors.... Mine seems like it is "bare naked". You can clearly see the LEDs inside. If you shine your LED at a white wall, you'll definitely not see the color circles I see (see pictures)
I think my phone is a lemon for sure.
What should I do? I have warranty until March 2017. I bought it on ebay. I believe it came from China.
Mine has glass protector, that's for sure I can get yellow color, but about 30% of LED is red. So... maybe that film is misaligned in my phone? I can't know for sure, but every color apart from pure R/G/B is displayed in two colors.
Could you guys do the "shine LED on white wall" test and take pictures? It seems like I'm the only one with this problem so far.
michuroztocz said:
I can't know for sure, but every color apart from pure R/G/B is displayed in two colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it look like my example? Compare to the pictures I took shining the LED combination on a white wall.
l_abaurre said:
Could you guys do the "shine LED on white wall" test and take pictures? It seems like I'm the only one with this problem so far.
Does it look like my example? Compare to the pictures I took shining the LED combination on a white wall.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's different - next to the wall I can only see yellow reflection, but when looking closely at LED itself, part of it is red.
I forgot to mention this. But my front facing camera is also misaligned. Up and to the left, to be specific:
I know that doesn't interfere with the camera quality at all, and it's a cosmetic issue. But, including the LED mishap, it's strike 2 for quality control. Does it justify a recall? Mind you, I have the Sony "limited" warranty in effect...
More pictures of the LED light. Close up with minimum brightness. All three LEDs on (white color):

Question Is it a dead/stuck pixel or dust?

Hello everyone,
I have a Mi 11 Lite with a Huaxing panel. I noticed there is a bluish spot (see below for screenshots) on the screen and thought it is a dead or stuck pixel. First, I tried some apps that claim to fix dead/stuck pixels, but they did not work. I am confused since, as far as I know, AMOLED panels do not cause dead pixels. What are your thoughts about that? Is it a dead/stuck pixel or just dust behind the pre-applied screen protector?
Thank you for your help!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You have stereoscopic vision, the images do not ie no depth perception.
You can see this far better than we can with 2D pics.
It could be damage to a few of the matrix drivers*.
Unless it spreads it's not a huge issue.
*there are many thousands of them in the active matrix.
blackhawk said:
You have stereoscopic vision, the images do not ie no depth perception.
You can see this far better than we can with 2D pics.
It could be damage to a few of the matrix drivers*.
Unless it spreads it's not a huge issue.
*there are many thousands of them in the active matrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly, thank you for your answer. By the way, the screen did not get any physical damage. As I understand from your answer, it is a normal thing in AMOLED panels and I should not worry about that, right? I hope it does not spread.
Mr E. said:
Firstly, thank you for your answer. By the way, the screen did not get any physical damage. As I understand from your answer, it is a normal thing in AMOLED panels and I should not worry about that, right? I hope it does not spread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a defect if it's not dust.
If new you could consider returning it.
It may be benign or a harbinger of a larger impending failure.
Likely it's just an isolated manufacturing flaw that was ignored or not spotted.
Get the app Screen Test on Playstore and run it to see what you got. It will make any defects more readily visible. Start there.
blackhawk said:
It's a defect if it's not dust.
If new you could consider returning it.
It may be benign or a harbinger of a larger impending failure.
Likely it's just an isolated manufacturing flaw that was ignored or not spotted.
Get the app Screen Test on Playstore and run it to see what you got. It will make any defects more readily visible. Start there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is visible on the white, red, and green backgrounds, but not on the blue or black backgrounds.
Mr E. said:
It is visible on the white, red, and green backgrounds, but not on the blue or black backgrounds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a good sign.
In your second image it looks like lint. It may well be a piece of blue lint like from a microfiber cloth.
blackhawk said:
That's a good sign.
In your second image it looks like lint. It may well be a piece of blue lint like from a microfiber cloth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not want to remove the pre-applied screen protector for now in case of scratches etc. So, I am going to order a new screen protector to replace the pre-applied one. I hope it is just lint from the factory while applying the screen protector (afaik they do the process in a dust-free environment, but we will see). To me, it looks like some type of pixel issue Thank you for your help again! I will tell you the result.
Mr E. said:
I do not want to remove the pre-applied screen protector for now in case of scratches etc. So, I am going to order a new screen protector to replace the pre-applied one. I hope it is just lint from the factory while applying the screen protector (afaik they do the process in a dust-free environment, but we will see). To me, it looks like some type of pixel issue Thank you for your help again! I will tell you the result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use some stereoscopic magnification on it. A point light source at different angles as well.
It may be a piece of lint under the screen.
Either way it is harmless if so.
A spot defect in the driver matrix could produce unpredictable colors variations of the spot so it impossible to tell from the screen test alone. Blown pixels are easy to spot... it's not that.
Leave the factory protector on until it wears out.
Lol, order more than one in case the first apply fails.
blackhawk said:
Use some stereoscopic magnification on it. A point light source at different angles as well.
It may be a piece of lint under the screen.
Either way it is harmless if so.
A spot defect in the driver matrix could produce unpredictable colors variations of the spot so it impossible to tell from the screen test alone. Blown pixels are easy to spot... it's not that.
Leave the factory protector on until it wears out.
Lol, order more than one in case the first apply fails.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[Update]
I removed the screen protector but it is still there. I am probably the only Mi 11 Lite user who experiences this issue. I am so unlucky
So it is either dust under the display or definitely a dead/stuck pixel.
By the way, its visibility changes when I adjust the brightness (high brightness = low visibility / low brightness = high visibility). Maybe you can interpret this situation.
For now, I have nothing to do but hope it does not spread.
Mr E. said:
[Update]
I removed the screen protector but it is still there. I am probably the only Mi 11 Lite user who experiences this issue. I am so unlucky
So it is either dust under the display or definitely a dead/stuck pixel.
By the way, its visibility changes when I adjust the brightness (high brightness = low visibility / low brightness = high visibility). Maybe you can interpret this situation.
For now, I have nothing to do but hope it does not spread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not just the organic leds but the active driver matrix built into the display with thousands of semiconductor junctions that drives the leds. Either the led is out of spec or it's not being supplied with enough current from its driver(s).
It may remain as is or get worse... it probably wouldn't spread.

Categories

Resources