I get that it's not a Nexus 4 and it's around $100 more off contract. I also get that the GS3 has more brand awareness, but this is a really awesome phone. I actually think the LG skin is good and adds a lot of functionality over stock Android.
I have a GS3, Note II, iPhone 5, and Lumia 920. This is my favorite phone out of all of them. The screen, feel in the hand, speed, and software touches make it almost a perfect device. Battery life has been good and my only real complaint is that the camera could have been better.
So what's holding it back? Marketing? I know LG has stumbled in the past, but this is not one of those times. I honestly probably wouldn't have even thought to buy the phone if not for the article about Consumer Reports rating it above the iPhone 5 and GS3 in customer satisfaction. I had to see what it was about and fell in love with it right away in the store.
As it stands, I couldn't recommend this phone more highly to people on AT&T who want an Android phone. I would definitely recommend it over the GS3, and that's saying a lot. The lack of activity in these forums, along with the sparse development tells me that it's definitely not getting into enough hands, and that's unfortunate.
LG's has a rather tarnished reputation as far as smartphone is concerned, they've had long lines of disappointing and mediocre mid-tier releases over the years plus poor record of software updates. Even with a phone like OG, it's going to take awhile to reboot their image.
mickey4mice said:
LG's has a rather tarnished reputation as far as smartphone is concerned, they've had long lines of disappointing and mediocre mid-tier releases over the years plus poor record of software updates. Even with a phone like OG, it's going to take awhile to reboot their image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuff Said.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
It's got 1M users, so I'd say it's selling well for a phone not made by Apple, Samsung, or HTC.
xboxfanj said:
It's got 1M users, so I'd say it's selling well for a phone not made by Apple, Samsung, or HTC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's definitely encouraging, but it could be much better and the forums are a ghost town comparatively.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_briefly_makes_it_2nd_top_phone_manufacturer_in_the_us-news-5371.php
I've not been a great fan of LG until this phone. I briefly considered that 3d camera phone from 2011 on AT&T that LG made, but ultimately chose the SII (and I made the right choice; I was one more f-ed up phone from buying an iphone). This phone impressed me in reviews and in stores (the demos blew me away). I chose it against the SIII and the One X and other flagship phones due to it matching what I wanted. I loved most of the SIII, but I hated that it had a physical home button. The one x seemed nice, but I didn't like non expandable storage and an unremovable battery. The only thing I had against the LGOG was the battery being built in; however, everything else about it sold me. I feel that LG has finally made a phone worth it (2 phones counting the Nexus), and have the potential to beat Samsung. However, this is an uphill battle for LG. I personally have known people to pick the SIII just because Samsung is the most widely known. LG will have to fight against that in order to be purchased. Plus, people are more impressed by expensive phones, and sometimes buy the expensive ones because they assume those are the best. I really think that that, oddly enough, is also contributing to the LGOG having slightly lower sales numbers.
Tl;dr
LG has a fight with Samsung due to name recognition, and price drops may have had a negative effect. Many customers don't research phones thoroughly, and buy from a certain brand, or the expensive ones (because you get what you pay for).
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I'm happy for getting the phone for only $49, but I can't grasp the reason behind the price drop. OG is their only qualified flagship in years yet they are on sale at the price point of low-end giveaways. Granted it's probably just weekend promo but still, I find it odd to lower the price to this range in a non-holiday season.
mickey4mice said:
I'm happy for getting the phone for only $49, but I can't grasp the reason behind the price drop. OG is their only qualified flagship in years yet they are on sale at the price point of low-end giveaways. Granted it's probably just weekend promo but still, I find it odd to lower the price to this range in a non-holiday season.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the reasoning behind the price drop is building for the future, if you get your best phone in as many hands possible, the people who by it recommend the brand to others and are more likely to buy lg in the future when its time to upgrade.
charleswesde said:
I think the reasoning behind the price drop is building for the future, if you get your best phone in as many hands possible, the people who by it recommend the brand to others and are more likely to buy lg in the future when its time to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know if any of my friends are looking into a new phone I will put in a good word for the OG. And that is funny because when it came out I originally looked at it and then went "Nah, I still want the One X."
By the time I was able to upgrade, the One X+ was out, at double the price of the OG and I didn't want an outdated phone. Now I'm not saying the One X isn't good, it had just already been replaced by a refresher phone.
I am soo happy with this phone.
bleached45 said:
I know if any of my friends are looking into a new phone I will put in a good word for the OG. And that is funny because when it came out I originally looked at it and then went "Nah, I still want the One X."
By the time I was able to upgrade, the One X+ was out, at double the price of the OG and I didn't want an outdated phone. Now I'm not saying the One X isn't good, it had just already been replaced by a refresher phone.
I am soo happy with this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Tegra 3 isn't all that great for speed or battery and I can't stand HTC's broken multitasking.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
greyhulk said:
The Tegra 3 isn't all that great for speed or battery and I can't stand HTC's broken multitasking.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Half of the reason I made this decision.
I had a Sony Xperia X10 with an ancient 1Ghz snapdragon and then got an Asus Transformer with a Tegra 2...
So I was impressed more by Nvidia/Tegra at the time than Qualcomm/Snapdragon (I know, completely unfair).
But I had been reading everywhere that the S4 Pro was a beast and much better than Tegra 3s.
I don't like Sense anyways and I would have had a custom ROM, so the multitasking wasn't a big deal.
We have an extra gig of RAM to play with too. :highfive:
could it possibly be that the talk of the optimus g pro is throw the prices so low and being released soon.
bobafx said:
could it possibly be that the talk of the optimus g pro is throw the prices so low and being released soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt it. If the price stays low in states, doesn't bode well with G launch in Europe, unless LG do a dual tier launch of G & G Pro at the same time, but that's a remote possibility given G is set for March release in EU region.
bobafx said:
could it possibly be that the talk of the optimus g pro is throw the prices so low and being released soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's always something else around the corner. The Pro is likely months from hitting the U. S. on any carrier.
In all honesty, I'd still choose the G. I prefer the size and the 200mhz overclock would hardly be noticeable.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
greyhulk said:
There's always something else around the corner. The Pro is likely months from hitting the U. S. on any carrier.
In all honesty, I'd still choose the G. I prefer the size and the 200mhz overclock would hardly be noticeable.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely agree. And it won't be long until we are able to overclock our phones too.
Sent from my Nocturnal'd LGOG!
greyhulk said:
There's always something else around the corner. The Pro is likely months from hitting the U. S. on any carrier.
In all honesty, I'd still choose the G. I prefer the size and the 200mhz overclock would hardly be noticeable.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I've heard before, "Don't chase technology 'cause you'll lose."
droidiac13 said:
Completely agree. And it won't be long until we are able to overclock our phones too.
Sent from my Nocturnal'd LGOG!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention that 1080p display will require more processing power making the speed difference negligible.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Speaking critically of the android community for a brief second..
As much as people criticize Apple fans for putting too much value in brand name, a lot of Android fans are really overly zealous Samsung fanboys.
I won't say it's a bad brand or that the phones they make aren't nice.. But, taking a stroll to the Android subreddit you will find a lot of rabid Samsung fanboyism.
We hear less criticism of Samsung these days because they are just that popular.. still I remember as though it were yesterday people wouldn't shut up about how cheap the phones felt, how horrible various aspects of touchwiz were..
And sadly a lot of people won't even consider the LG OG because it's not Samsung.. but, if Samsung were to incorporate some of the LGOG features people would rave over it. I can see it now... slipping the LGOG specs and skin into a Samsung shell and hearing people brag and brag and act as though it Samsung were curing cancer.
Outside of that, honestly at $350 the N4 makes a hell of a deal. Even if you had a contract but, would like to keep your service without signing up for another 2 years would be a nice option.
Besides all of that? Well your average customer is told what to buy really. Speaking as a salesman I can tell you, if you don't know what you are buying, I'll be happy to tell you. (Granted I no longer work in sales but, it was a lesson learned.)
Edit: one final thought. I don't care because I'm honestly just that happy with it..... but, we still don't have an official cm10 port and that hurts us big time.
Related
Man this phone has everything
Best IPS screen
S4 Pro 4 Cores
Micro Sd slot
2100 battery
Its on top of all phones with its spec's.
And LG is still sleeping.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
I know and there is too little for advertising from lg, att or sprint, this phone is a killer in terms of specs and even for benchmarks its ways over any from Samsung, htc, iPhone.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I think many people are aware of, but avoiding this phone because of LG's poor reputation with software updates. Also, the locked bootloader is reaaaaallly a dealbreaker.
I wish LG didn't lock the bootloader, everyone would be all over this phone and LG would finally be recognized as a legitimate option. But until they either get their act together with software updates or unlock the bootloader, I think this phone will probably be passed over by many
Normal people don't understand or care about locked bootloaders. Hell, most don't care about software updates either. LG needs to market this phone just like the S3, One X, iPhone, and get them moving off shelves.
dontdo_that said:
I think many people are aware of, but avoiding this phone because of LG's poor reputation with software updates. Also, the locked bootloader is reaaaaallly a dealbreaker.
I wish LG didn't lock the bootloader, everyone would be all over this phone and LG would finally be recognized as a legitimate option. But until they either get their act together with software updates or unlock the bootloader, I think this phone will probably be passed over by many
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From reports, LG didn't choose to lock the bootloader. AT&T set the requirement. Too bad AT&T is going to miss out on huge sales of this phone, as a direct result.
dbgeek said:
From reports, LG didn't choose to lock the bootloader. AT&T set the requirement. Too bad AT&T is going to miss out on huge sales of this phone, as a direct result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint's is also locked and sprint has never forced mfg's to lock devices, so that excuse is bullspit.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
BoostedSR20 said:
Normal people don't understand or care about locked bootloaders. Hell, most don't care about software updates either. LG needs to market this phone just like the S3, One X, iPhone, and get them moving off shelves.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true, but it helps to have a dedicated community to eventually drive sales out in the "normal" world. Think about it: Who is the guy (or girl) in your group of friends who gives the phone advice? If your answer was "Me," you get a gold star. XDA may be a small group of users, but we can exert influence outside of this website. Samsung isn't the most popular Android OEM because their phones are far and away the best devices. Samsung has the best updates, a fairly hassle-free dev environment without locked boot loaders, and they pimp their specs. HTC and LG can match them on specs, so what are they missing?
Hemlocke said:
This is true, but it helps to have a dedicated community to eventually drive sales out in the "normal" world. Think about it: Who is the guy (or girl) in your group of friends who gives the phone advice? If your answer was "Me," you get a gold star. XDA may be a small group of users, but we can exert influence outside of this website. Samsung isn't the most popular Android OEM because their phones are far and away the best devices. Samsung has the best updates, a fairly hassle-free dev environment without locked boot loaders, and they pimp their specs. HTC and LG can match them on specs, so what are they missing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh hell I should be on Sammy's payroll for the all the devices I've had people buy over the years...
BoostedSR20 said:
Oh hell I should be on Sammy's payroll for the all the devices I've had people buy over the years...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, given the poor build quality, the sub-par radios, and their unwillingness to drop Exynos source, I'm surprised they are still in such good shape here. I saw, before I got rid of my i9300, that some heavy hitter devs were leaving because of Samsung's refusal to release the Exynos source.
Really, the formula is simple for Android domination: Build a powerful device with a great design and great materials (HTC One X w/ A15 SoC), be dev friendly (unlocked bootloader and release all source), run AOSP or have the CM or AOKP team build your ship ROMs, and update as fast as humanly possible after AOSP drops. LG is THIS close to having the formula, although they should have used the Exmor Rs BSI sensor, unlocked the bootloader, and released all of their proprietary source code.
I agree. This phone is a monster. Unlock. bootloader and and get aosp jellybean on it and its a wrap!
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
kc720 said:
I agree. This phone is a monster. Unlock. bootloader and and get aosp jellybean on it and its a wrap!
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed. Still hesitant to pull the trigger on this, with the N4 so close, and the locked bootloader on this. This just has so much more potential, with LTE and the SD card.
Hemlocke said:
Yeah, given the poor build quality, the sub-par radios, and their unwillingness to drop Exynos source, I'm surprised they are still in such good shape here. I saw, before I got rid of my i9300, that some heavy hitter devs were leaving because of Samsung's refusal to release the Exynos source.
Really, the formula is simple for Android domination: Build a powerful device with a great design and great materials (HTC One X w/ A15 SoC), be dev friendly (unlocked bootloader and release all source), run AOSP or have the CM or AOKP team build your ship ROMs, and update as fast as humanly possible after AOSP drops. LG is THIS close to having the formula, although they should have used the Exmor Rs BSI sensor, unlocked the bootloader, and released all of their proprietary source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poor build quality? Yeah everyone says that, but I don't see it. Yes, it's plastic. All of my Samsung devices hold up just fine. Just because something has glass or metal on both sides doesn't make it better, it makes it heavier. I don't have any issues with *any* of the top tier phones when it comes to build quality.
And again, none of that is what makes the S3 a top seller. Marketing. Advertising. A decent product with decent support. That's what sells to the masses. How many people say "did you see that new commercial for the S3? Awesome"
Obviously what sells me on a phone and most XDA members is completely different.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
BoostedSR20 said:
Poor build quality? Yeah everyone says that, but I don't see it. Yes, it's plastic. All of my Samsung devices hold up just fine. Just because something has glass or metal on both sides doesn't make it better, it makes it heavier. I don't have any issues with *any* of the top tier phones when it comes to build quality.
And again, none of that is what makes the S3 a top seller. Marketing. Advertising. A decent product with decent support. That's what sells to the masses. How many people say "did you see that new commercial for the S3? Awesome"
Obviously what sells me on a phone and most XDA members is completely different.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S3 creaks, the battery door is flimsy, and good luck finding a used S3 without scratches on the battery door or bezel. If you drop it from a normal standing height onto a hard surface, it's toast. When the iPhone is more durable than your device (The iPhone has always been built better, but not the most durable), you have issues, especially when that build is all plastic.
LG DOES need to do some advertising, and they should take a page out of the Samsung book and make fun of Samsung's last-gen hardware and flimsy build.
As for us, we can do a lot to sell phones. A vibrant developer community will draw interest.
Hemlocke said:
The S3 creaks, the battery door is flimsy, and good luck finding a used S3 without scratches on the battery door or bezel. If you drop it from a normal standing height onto a hard surface, it's toast. When the iPhone is more durable than your device (The iPhone has always been built better, but not the most durable), you have issues, especially when that build is all plastic.
LG DOES need to do some advertising, and they should take a page out of the Samsung book and make fun of Samsung's last-gen hardware and flimsy build.
As for us, we can do a lot to sell phones. A vibrant developer community will draw interest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just sold my used S3 on XDA, it was flawless front and back. It's all in how you take care of it. I'm anal. Most people are not. As for the back plate getting scratched? Yep. I agree. It was a joke. The flimsy part? No. With the battery cover ON the phone, it felt perfectly normal to me. I never had creaking issues, or thought it felt flimsy. It's light weight plastic. I get it. I'm not defending Samsung, simply saying a lot of the "build quality" debates are personal opinion. I've seen Samsung phones take a beating for years and last no problem. Same with the iPhone. And I've also seen them both take minor drops and self destruct. Even with cases.
As for the LGOG, yeah I think it feels great. Better than the S3? Heck yeah. Much better. Do I really care? No. I'm more interested in the screen, and what's inside. Again, that's my own opinion.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
BoostedSR20 said:
I just sold my used S3 on XDA, it was flawless front and back. It's all in how you take care of it. I'm anal. Most people are not. As for the back plate getting scratched? Yep. I agree. It was a joke. The flimsy part? No. With the battery cover ON the phone, it felt perfectly normal to me. I never had creaking issues, or thought it felt flimsy. It's light weight plastic. I get it. I'm not defending Samsung, simply saying a lot of the "build quality" debates are personal opinion. I've seen Samsung phones take a beating for years and last no problem. Same with the iPhone. And I've also seen them both take minor drops and self destruct. Even with cases.
As for the LGOG, yeah I think it feels great. Better than the S3? Heck yeah. Much better. Do I really care? No. I'm more interested in the screen, and what's inside. Again, that's my own opinion.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had two i9300's, and how cheap they felt bothered me. To each his own, I guess.
I like the OG screen, and just the five, or so, minutes I spent playing with it at AT&T was enough to impress me. That said, I may still go with the Nexus 4, just because the ease of modification. LTE and microSD are great upside, but I don't have LTE in my town (yet) and I can live with 16GB. I'm going to mull it over this weekend.
Hemlocke said:
Indeed. Still hesitant to pull the trigger on this, with the N4 so close, and the locked bootloader on this. This just has so much more potential, with LTE and the SD card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same exact boat as you... The LTE and SD card would be really helpful.. especially because in San Diego we do have LTE and it's great. Plus this phone is 150$ cheaper than the 16GB N4 for AT&T users... ah god why do they make us face such decisions...
Though if this device runs so seamlessly with 4.0, I wonder what the N4 will be like once they get 4.2 all tweaked in, free of bloatware :fingers-crossed:
I agree on average though that LG and AT&T need to advertise this device more... I wonder if Samsung has AT&T by the balls still for advertising/marketing priority rights.
I agree on average though that LG and AT&T need to advertise this device more... I wonder if Samsung has AT&T by the balls still for advertising/marketing priority rights.[/QUOTE]
The thing is that, every time I call at&t store they advertise ( Get iPhone 5 when on hold) so Apple has them by the balls.
Seriously! They need to advertise more! With more advertisement comes more cases!!!
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
A little over the top but they could air this commercial on cable and or regular tv infomercial style.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kge8aKlrNgg
dbgeek said:
From reports, LG didn't choose to lock the bootloader. AT&T set the requirement. Too bad AT&T is going to miss out on huge sales of this phone, as a direct result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Though a locked bootloader is bad news for develeopers customers could really care less if anything about this. Tell the average person that the LG has its bootloader locked and they will look at you like you are from another planet.
With that said this LG phone is the best LG phone I have ever used. Still not enough to sway me away from the Note 2 though.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda premium
OK, so i was thinking about either getting this phone or waiting to see what shows up at CES.
I know CES is tomorrow so i was wondering if a phone that has better specs comes out.
If You guys can recommend a phone or even give a suggestion i would greatly appreciate it.
I'm used to the Motorola atrix 2 if that helps
I need it to be AT&T and be running at least ICS but preferably JB
I have to wait til March for an upgrade
Thanks
Oh and I bet you cant hit that THANKS button at the bottom left of this post
[PLEASE VOTE]
The LGOG has ICS but runs like JB. Imagine the power it'll have when it gets JB.
The way mobile technology has been speeding along, by March, something with better specs will definitely be out/announced. Then you'll just have a short wait till you can get your hands on it. Today, I would absolutely recommend this phone. Best specs out there but, cmon, by March you probably need to be looking ahead.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
There will always a better phone around the corner. At some point you have jump in.
Sent from my badass LG Optimus G
In all honesty... I would wait to take a look at what the Galaxy S4 will bring since you have to wait until March anyway.
Galaxy S4 will have a huge selection of accessories and ROMs
However,
I have chosen the LGOG for the following reasons:
1. My upgrade was close to its release.
2. I paid $100 for a phone-beast.
3. It is the first quad-core phone with LTE on AT&T.
4. The display is not 5 inches or more.
5. It is basically a nicer Nexus 4. (I have learned that hardware as close to the current Nexus device as possible is a very safe bet)
6. The last phone that I though was this sexy was a Nexus One. This thing is gorgeous.
thanks guys
Thank you to all who replied
I think all the wow factor phones are getting held up for mobile world congress next month. All I really saw so far that was interesting was the new xperia ZL or whatever it was, but given sony's track record there will be an updated version by march.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
If you're going to be waiting until spring, I'd keep my eyes out for devices using the upcoming SnapDragon 600 or 800 processors that were just announced. The specs on these chipsets are amazing...40 to 75 percent more powerful than our Snapdragon S4 Pro processors.
Sent from my LG-E970
DraginMagik said:
If you're going to be waiting until spring, I'd keep my eyes out for devices using the upcoming SnapDragon 600 or 800 processors that were just announced. The specs on these chipsets are amazing...40 to 75 percent more powerful than our Snapdragon S4 Pro processors.
Sent from my LG-E970
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DAMMIT QUALCOMM... take a break... let me enjoy this feeling for a while.
:laugh:
bleached45 said:
DAMMIT QUALCOMM... take a break... let me enjoy this feeling for a while.
:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way of the gadget world. As soon as you buy the latest and greatest, it's already obsolete.
Take comfort that everyone who buys one of those new Qualcomm chipped phones will be surpassed just as quickly by the next thing to come out.
Nastybutler said:
Take comfort that everyone who buys one of those new Qualcomm chipped phones will be surpassed just as quickly by the next thing to come out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't wait. :B
Nastybutler said:
Take comfort that everyone who buys one of those new Qualcomm chipped phones will be surpassed just as quickly by the next thing to come out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This makes me feel better... slightly.
I won't ever consider a Sony phone, especially on AT&T, given that their phones come with locked bootloaders that can't be unlocked. International versions are easily unlocked. By Sony. Just not the US versions. I should know, I had a Sony Xperia Play phone for a while and I recently returned an Xperia TL.
sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
The thing that kills me, and this isn't an attack, is that a lot of people are like "I would NEVER get this phone because it's made by this!"
Like me, I personally don't like Samsung. And I make it a point to not buy their phones.
Sony's I have no experience with and I've only had an LG twice (this phone and a flip phone when I was 14).
But my point is people say they hate LG for whatever reason and then sell this phone and by the N4, which yknow, made by LG.
Again, not at attack! I was simply doing research on when the N5 was coming out and all these people are like, I HATE LG, NEXUS ALL THE WAY (sent from my N4). It's just laughable.
Murasakiii said:
The thing that kills me, and this isn't an attack, is that a lot of people are like "I would NEVER get this phone because it's made by this!"
Like me, I personally don't like Samsung. And I make it a point to not buy their phones.
Sony's I have no experience with and I've only had an LG twice (this phone and a flip phone when I was 14).
But my point is people say they hate LG for whatever reason and then sell this phone and by the N4, which yknow, made by LG.
Again, not at attack! I was simply doing research on when the N5 was coming out and all these people are like, I HATE LG, NEXUS ALL THE WAY (sent from my N4). It's just laughable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope they were being ironic... and not moronic.
I only had Sony's first Android phone.
It was meh, I heard they did better after that.
It is AT&T I would never buy.
They are a terrible and lock down all their phones.
Sent from my AT&T LG Optimus G.
I'm going to have to say the latter, lol.
Funny enough one of those people was AndreaCr.
bleached45 said:
I hope they were being ironic... and not moronic.
I only had Sony's first Android phone.
It was meh, I heard they did better after that.
It is AT&T I would never buy.
They are a terrible and lock down all their phones.
Sent from my AT&T LG Optimus G.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FWIW, they did much better. Their newest Xperia Z(L) looks like magnificent work of art.
As long as you're waiting, see what the S4 has to offer. Samsung's have custom ROM's about 7 hours after the first go on sale. Also, by then, the development on this phone should really be kicking into high gear (knock on wood). Also, you might catch wind of the LGOG2 then.
However, at some point there is about only so much power you're going to need in a handset that everything else becomes overkill. These phones are almost as powerful/fast as a mid-level laptop, but you don't want to type out a long word doc on them or edit an excel file. Finally, this will probably cost a coke and a smile by then compared to the S4 or LGOG2.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Murasakiii said:
I'm going to have to say the latter, lol.
Funny enough one of those people was AndreaCr.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha! Now in the N4 forums.
johnbyebye said:
FWIW, they did much better. Their newest Xperia Z(L) looks like magnificent work of art.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I love the aesthetics of the xperia phones... haven't looked that one up yet though.
I would never judge a phone by it's manufacturer.
Look at Motorola. We went from the original Verizon Droid to the piece of sh**t Backflip on AT&T. Then we have the Atrix 4g, which in my experience had nice specs, but overall was a terrible quality phone.
HTC use to be the kind of Android phones, and now they have dropped off. (Look at their latest earnings).
Also do not forget the earliest Android offering by Samsung that I can remember - Samsung Moment for Sprint. That thing was all kids of ugly and slow.
I used to work for an eBay reseller, and played with 100 - 150 phones per day. Manufacturer is really irrelevant. You have to look at the unit as in individual.
This isn't the typical, which phone should i buy or why question, i'm doing a project on how important brand recognition is so I'm just really curious if you guys will help. So why did you all buy the OG over the other top phones that were out when you bought it? Also, how important are the manufacturer added features/skins (gimmicks, really) to you when you're buying a phone? (Such as the Q stuff on our LG phones or the S stuff on Samsungs, ect....)
Any responses will be helpful and appreciated
Why lgog?
HTC one x+: lgog has expandable storage and better processor
Galaxy S3: lgog has a better design and better processor
Galaxy Note 2: Size lol
Its way to big ...
And because the lgog is similar to the nexus 4 and I expected some development benefits their and a lot of people have the s3 and I wanted something different
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Compared other phones. The quad core processor, 2GB ram, 16GB internal and 16GB microSD killed the competition for the comparable price of $99. The 4.7" screen is nice, not to big, not to small. The carbon fiber look back was a nice bonus, even though I soon found out the back glass cracks so easily :-/
The overall look and feel of the phone really caught my eye also.
My wife has the S2 and I came from an Infuse, which was a great phone, just wanted something different than Samsung. I had never owned an LG phone...
All in all, I love the phone, especially the performance, the only downfall for me is how easily the back glass broke.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I bought the OG for a number of reasons:
Price ($99 contract)
Similarity to the Nexus 4 (development!)
Size
Design, it feels/looks like a solid brick.
But, you're doing a project on brand recognition. So I'll focus more on that.
At first, I was skeptical about buying an LG phone. I considered the One X+, and even the iPhone 5 (shudder). I gave LG a shot though because they built the Nexus 4. If it wasn't for the nexus 4, I wouldn't have bought this device. Brand recognition is important, but you gotta give others a chance. :good:
I've had all three of the others and this is by far the best...
One X/X+ has issues with lag, non-expandable storage, poor battery life, but one amazing screen.
S3 is nice, but it does have that over saturated AMOLED screen. The LCD on the LGOG is much better to my horrid eyes. Almost as good as the One X series, but not quite.
Dr0!dFreek said:
Why lgog?
HTC one x+: lgog has expandable storage and better processor
Galaxy S3: lgog has a better design and better processor
Galaxy Note 2: Size lol
Its way to big ...
And because the lgog is similar to the nexus 4 and I expected some development benefits their and a lot of people have the s3 and I wanted something different
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hollywood528 said:
Compared other phones. The quad core processor, 2GB ram, 16GB internal and 16GB microSD killed the competition for the comparable price of $99. The 4.7" screen is nice, not to big, not to small. The carbon fiber look back was a nice bonus, even though I soon found out the back glass cracks so easily :-/
The overall look and feel of the phone really caught my eye also.
My wife has the S2 and I came from an Infuse, which was a great phone, just wanted something different than Samsung. I had never owned an LG phone...
All in all, I love the phone, especially the performance, the only downfall for me is how easily the back glass broke.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mike724 said:
I bought the OG for a number of reasons:
Price ($99 contract)
Similarity to the Nexus 4 (development!)
Size
Design, it feels/looks like a solid brick.
But, you're doing a project on brand recognition. So I'll focus more on that.
At first, I was skeptical about buying an LG phone. I considered the One X+, and even the iPhone 5 (shudder). I gave LG a shot though because they built the Nexus 4. If it wasn't for the nexus 4, I wouldn't have bought this device. Brand recognition is important, but you gotta give others a chance. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
id10terrordfw said:
I've had all three of the others and this is by far the best...
One X/X+ has issues with lag, non-expandable storage, poor battery life, but one amazing screen.
S3 is nice, but it does have that over saturated AMOLED screen. The LCD on the LGOG is much better to my horrid eyes. Almost as good as the One X series, but not quite.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me just ask one more question, if you guys don't mind responding (i'll probably update the original post with it too) but, how important are the manufacturer added features (gimmicks, really) to you when you're buying a phone? Such as the Q stuff on our LG phones or the S stuff on Samsungs, ect....
Btw, thanks again guys, this is helpful! :good:
crward said:
Let me just ask one more question, if you guys don't mind responding (i'll probably update the original post with it too) but, how important are the manufacturer added features (gimmicks, really) to you when you're buying a phone? Such as the Q stuff on our LG phones or the S stuff on Samsungs, ect....
Btw, thanks again guys, this is helpful! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all. I've always rooted and installed AOSP ROMs if possible ASAP
____
Sent from my LG Original Gangsta
crward said:
Let me just ask one more question, if you guys don't mind responding (i'll probably update the original post with it too) but, how important are the manufacturer added features (gimmicks, really) to you when you're buying a phone? Such as the Q stuff on our LG phones or the S stuff on Samsungs, ect....
Btw, thanks again guys, this is helpful! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really inpotaint at all......But now that I have the phone I find some of the features useful
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Dr0!dFreek said:
Not really inpotaint at all......But now that I have the phone I find some of the features useful
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah i find most of the features manufacturers add to be a turn off... lol but LG's done a pretty good job, they have a pretty light skin and it's nice. Not even missing AOSP all that much on this thing. I have tried SnowJB though, but just keep coming back to stock, rooted.
Chose the Optimus G over the One X+ becuause I previously owned the one X and didnt enjoy the interface. I chose the Optimus G over the Galaxy s3 because everyone and their mother had one....BTW I wonder how all thoese people feel now that samsung did a evolution instead of a revolution to their phones. All I remember is everyone bashing the 5 for not innovating and the s4 gives us infared and a few extra gimmicks(Ignoring the hardware of course). Sorry just had a side rant. I just wish people will be fair about things. Android excels in having a moddable device with lots of options and apple excels in having the whole phone/music player/internet things down packed along with design.
I really feel like this phone is the biggest hidden gem of anything out there right now. I like owning a phone that very few others even know about. I had the Note 2 and original One X, so nothing against those phones at all. LG had nothing to do with my decision one way or the other.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
LGOG
I was coming from an old school Inspire 4G and was desperately in need of a new phone. I did want the HTC One, but it kept getting delayed and I finally ran out of patience. I've never been a fan of Samsung devices, they feel flimsy to me and Touchwiz is a horrible skin IMO. Therefore, none of the Galaxy devices were even in consideration. I did consider the One X+, but was kind of turned off by the stories of battery life. Also, it only had 1 gig of system RAM, compared to the OG's 2 gigs. So in essence, the quad core processor, 2 gigs of memory, 16 gigs internal storage + the SD card slot and solid construction with no flex (looking at you, Samsung) along with the low price sealed the deal for me.
That help?
I bought this phone despite LG not because of them. One of the big knocks against them is their slow software updates, and combine that with AT&T's piss poor track record for releasing updates, I knew what I was getting into. I'm hoping the dev support continues so I don't have to rely on LG and AT&T for anything.
I have to stick with AT&T unfortunately as they are the only national carrier in Alaska, so unless I want an iPhone, they are the only one who has the latest phones. Local telecoms are a year or two behind the curve with their hardware, although they seem to be getting better, which is why I bought this phone outright so I could use Straight Talk without a contract.
I chose the OG for the same reasons everyone else has stated: great screen, blazing performance, and expandable storage. The LG skin isn't intrusive or as dated as most of the competition's are.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
crward said:
This isn't the typical, which phone should i buy or why question, i'm doing a project on how important brand recognition is so I'm just really curious if you guys will help. So why did you all buy the OG over the other top phones that were out when you bought it? Also, how important are the manufacturer added features/skins (gimmicks, really) to you when you're buying a phone? (Such as the Q stuff on our LG phones or the S stuff on Samsungs, ect....)
Any responses will be helpful and appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought the og because it had the best specs. I did lots of research as I came from iPhone so I wanted a really good android to replace it. I considered the S3, OX+, and OG. I ruled out the S3 because of the dual core processor, and the OX+ because of limited ram, and the 8 app max. I don't care for the added features. For example, wise screen has never worked correctly for me.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
I didn't even know about any of these features until after I bought the phone. I almost always immediately root and flash a custom Rom the first day. So all that fancy stuff doesn't really interest me much
Thought I am rooted on this phone, I am still running stock.. I am really impressed with the functionality and smoothness. And after learning about the little features, I am enjoying playing around with them
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I'll have to admit I jumped ship I had a s3 and sold it and bought a unlocked OG only had it two days haven't rooted yet but I will the OG does everything the S3 does only better it's faster smoother and better looking like the difference between a 350 and a 454 there is no sub for horsepower and the LG has it all ( until tomorrow when something else comes out )
As has been stated by many:
better processor
better "feel" (didn't feel cheap like the S3)
liked the LG UI over other manufacturer UI's
screen, esp the width (wider than other 4.7" displays)
I got this instead of the S3 because TouchWiz looks more like a toy than a phone. If I had gone for anything Samsung, it would have been the Galaxy Nexus, which likely won't run all that well in two years comparatively. Also, this phone was the sane price as the GalNex when I got it.
HTC Sense is okay, but I've always hated how the One X(+) look physically. Plus HTC is too damn confusing to the point where someone who's done the research still wasn't sure what he'd have been getting...
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
I don't have this phone but what got my attention was the LG design. If you have looked at the Optimus 4x or G2X both of these phones were the first of its kind. G2X with a dual core CPU. O4X with Tegra 3 Quad Core CPU. LG doesn't really advertise their product too well, but I think that a good benefit. even tho they tend to take their time with updating their software I preferred it that way. Samsung sometimes pushed out a new update with more bugs then it original had. Also I never was interested in Samsung touchwiz. LG UI has a better feel to then Samsung UI. HTC sense I never liked, however it kinda reminds me of a MIUI, but MIUI is a hell of a lot better then sense.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
I came from a Samsung non-smartphone so I was really interested in the S3 at first, until I saw one for real. It seemed so huge at the time... and plastic. So I shopped around for a smaller phone. I was all for Motorola as well having good experience with their non-smartphones, and I was willing to go with HTC as well. LG was not high on my list of desirability. But when it came down to it, anything smaller had significantly inferior specs compared to the top tier phones, and the OG had an unbeatable combination of features, specs, and price.
Since this was my first smartphone, I had no affinity for any manufacturer's skins, and all I cared about was how potentially offensive LG's was, and it gets pretty good reviews for being minimalistic.
Consider this before buying. No flame intented. I simply was planning to get one myself then changed my mind.
http://www.phonedog.com/2013/04/10/i-want-htc-s-one-but-google-io-2013-has-me-worried/
Underground_XI said:
Consider this before buying. No flame intented. I simply was planning to get one myself then changed my mind.
http://www.phonedog.com/2013/04/10/i-want-htc-s-one-but-google-io-2013-has-me-worried/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not particularly worried; I actually posted some thoughts about Google I/O earlier today:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/10/4209366/a-prediction-for-google-i-o
I'm quite happy with Android 4.1, so I guess it depends what KLP brings, but it's hard to imagine Google bringing anything that would make me want to abandon HTC's awesome camera software (which is one of the reasons I personally prefer HTC phones).
I bought a One XL last year around the same time, and Google I/O didn't make me regret that decision. Besides, this time I'll have a One XL I can mess around with if I want to install CM11 or something.
Silellak said:
I'm not particularly worried; I actually posted some thoughts about Google I/O earlier today:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/10/4209366/a-prediction-for-google-i-o
I'm quite happy with Android 4.1, so I guess it depends what KLP brings, but it's hard to imagine Google bringing anything that would make me want to abandon HTC's awesome camera software (which is one of the reasons I personally prefer HTC phones).
I bought a One XL last year around the same time, and Google I/O didn't make me regret that decision. Besides, this time I'll have a One XL I can mess around with if I want to install CM11 or something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely. Personally, I feel HTC is on the brink of a huge change, they've already dropped the source code and the phone hasn't even shipped in US yet! Also, it will definitely help to have the same device across several carriers (Even international ones!)
I feel the winds of change wafting from HTC and I must say, I love it.
jkt97401 said:
Precisely. Personally, I feel HTC is on the brink of a huge change, they've already dropped the source code and the phone hasn't even shipped in US yet! Also, it will definitely help to have the same device across several carriers (Even international ones!)
I feel the winds of change wafting from HTC and I must say, I love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am definitely super-excited that the international and NA versions of the HTC One use the same chipset - that was one of the big issues with the One X and One XL last year.
This phone will get key lime pie without a doubt.
The development will be huge for this device
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Underground_XI said:
Consider this before buying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jkt97401 said:
I feel the winds of change wafting from HTC and I must say, I love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be the voice of doom or piss in anyone's Cheerios but HTC's in a world of hurt. The shipping delay for the One's cost them dearly financially and now its actual availability is going to bump up against Samsung's gazillion dollar marketing budget for the SGS4. Samsung also co-ops heavily with the U.S. carriers for advertising and provides big sales incentives down to the associate level. And if you walk in to a Best Buy you'll be greeted by Samsung's "Experience" sound and light show while a dummy One sits lonely and tethered to an end-cap somewhere next to a "free" LG Phone. With a Nexus 5 possible at I/O, an iP5s and lower-cost iPhone in June, Motorola's "Phone X," a Note III, and LG's 1080P 5" and 5.5" Optimus Pro Plus' all due by fall, the One's going to get lost in a sea of other devices a few months after launch because of HTC's (now even more) limited promotional budget. They have a tough road to hoe and 2013 will determine their future.
Here's an interesting discussion on HTC's current position from the international One forum...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2226471
Hmm I just sold my Nexus 4 because I never ever used it. It was never a real upgrade from the Galaxy Nexusnif you ask me. Adding a new processor and 1 extra GB of ram n a shiny back doesn't wow me
Silellak said:
I'm not particularly worried; I actually posted some thoughts about Google I/O earlier today:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/10/4209366/a-prediction-for-google-i-o
I'm quite happy with Android 4.1, so I guess it depends what KLP brings, but it's hard to imagine Google bringing anything that would make me want to abandon HTC's awesome camera software (which is one of the reasons I personally prefer HTC phones).
I bought a One XL last year around the same time, and Google I/O didn't make me regret that decision. Besides, this time I'll have a One XL I can mess around with if I want to install CM11 or something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a canon eos 60D. You might consider buying that if you give the camera such importance.
BarryH_GEG said:
Not to be the voice of doom or piss in anyone's Cheerios but HTC's in a world of hurt. The shipping delay for the One's cost them dearly financially and now its actual availability is going to bump up against Samsung's gazillion dollar marketing budget for the SGS4. Samsung also co-ops heavily with the U.S. carriers for advertising and provides big sales incentives down to the associate level. And if you walk in to a Best Buy you'll be greeted by Samsung's "Experience" sound and light show while a dummy One sits lonely and tethered to an end-cap somewhere next to a "free" LG Phone. With a Nexus 5 possible at I/O, an iP5s and lower-cost iPhone in June, Motorola's "Phone X," a Note III, and LG's 1080P 5" and 5.5" Optimus Pro Plus' all due by fall, the One's going to get lost in a sea of other devices a few months after launch because of HTC's (now even more) limited promotional budget. They have a tough road to hoe and 2013 will determine their future.
Here's an interesting discussion on HTC's current position from the international One forum...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2226471
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm 99% sure that the next Nexus phone won't be at I/O. Also, the 5s won't be much to write home about. The S models never are.
Sent from my SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
reply
THANKS A LOT:cyclops::cyclops:
Underground_XI said:
I have a canon eos 60D. You might consider buying that if you give the camera such importance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer a smartphone camera that's always with me.
Sent from my One X using Tapatalk 2
YoungAceAtlanta said:
Hmm I just sold my Nexus 4 because I never ever used it. It was never a real upgrade from the Galaxy Nexusnif you ask me. Adding a new processor and 1 extra GB of ram n a shiny back doesn't wow me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then why are you here? Trolling?
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
At least the writer is still getting the HTC one. Lol
Anyways there's always a new os comming out at io. A new nexus 5 ? Nah that's this fall.
A new nexus 7? Yes. Google glass? Yes.
Thew question is will HTC upgrade to 4.2 to 5.0 or from 4.1 to 5.0?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
expertzero1 said:
At least the writer is still getting the HTC one. Lol
Anyways there's always a new os comming out at io. A new nexus 5 ? Nah that's this fall.
A new nexus 7? Yes. Google glass? Yes.
Thew question is will HTC upgrade to 4.2 to 5.0 or from 4.1 to 5.0?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe they will, considering this is HTC's flagship phone.
This is an easy one for me. I'll just keep my Nexus 4 around until I/O. If what Google shows at I/O wows me and I can get it on the Nexus 4, I'll consider selling the One, but DAMN, it would have to be some mind blowing software for me to give up such amazing hardware and go back to a slower processor, worse screen, worse camera, worse speaker, cheaper materials, and no LTE.
gtg465x said:
This is an easy one for me. I'll just keep my Nexus 4 around until I/O. If what Google shows at I/O wows me and I can get it on the Nexus 4, I'll consider selling the One, but DAMN, it would have to be some mind blowing software for me to give up such amazing hardware and go back to a slower processor, worse screen, worse camera, worse speaker, cheaper materials, and no LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be. It is 5.0
Got me thinking...
Whole argument is stupid in my opinion. It's clearly cut black and white. If you want immediate updates to current version of android go for a nexus. If you want real hardware get the HTC One. Unless HTC builds a nexus the new one won't be special.
I don't know why people buy carrier subsidized phones then complain when it stays a version behind. The phone company is there to make money. Put on your big boy pants and go nexus or shut up about it. It's really that simple
Sent from my HTC One VX using xda premium
jmztaylor said:
Whole argument is stupid in my opinion. It's clearly cut black and white. If you want immediate updates to current version of android go for a nexus. If you want real hardware get the HTC One. Unless HTC builds a nexus the new one won't be special.
I don't know why people buy carrier subsidized phones then complain when it stays a version behind. The phone company is there to make money. Put on your big boy pants and go nexus or shut up about it. It's really that simple
Sent from my HTC One VX using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It must hurt you knowing your $600 phone will be 2 versions behind in only one month since it came out
Underground_XI said:
It must hurt you knowing your $600 phone will be 2 versions behind in only one month sonce it came out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point still stands. It's a phone, not a liver or heart that you have no choice on. My point is why ***** and moan about it when you yourself can do something about it and go elsewhere
Sent from my HTC One VX using xda premium
Got the G2 on launch day from a Verizon store here in town. Phone is great, no doubt about that. What worries me is that this appears to be a hero phone without much demand. HTC has done a great job of marketing the One, and everyone knows Moto. The G2 on display at the Verizon store is jammed between an iPhone and an older model Samsung something-or-other with no signage other than a huge "Samsung Galaxy" poster on the wall behind it.
If I keep this, it will be the third device in a row that I've bought as a "flagship" which wound up getting the cold shoulder in many ways.
First I had the HTC Incredible, probably the most popular of the bunch. While it did have ROM development, it was quickly forgotten when the HTC EVO came out seemingly a week later. Accessories were few and far between.
Second was the Galaxy Nexus, heralded as a "Google experience" device on Verizon. After endless launch delays, it came out and was quickly forgotten by Verizon and Google both. Accessories were few and far between.
Now I have the LG G2, a great device with awesome specs! I actually don't mind the Verizon/LG "skin" on this so much. But again, Verizon had to **** it up with changing the buttons and making the thing thicker. Accessories will be practically nil for this device other than the three cases from Verizon at launch. There will be countless Chinese imports that will claim to fit but will not, because the back-alley factories making this crap don't give a damn about doing anything per spec. Just make it look vaguely correct and slap a knock off hello-kitty design on the back and call 'er done! "Your Happy Plastic Partner" indeed!
I am also afraid that development will completely stall on this device because everyone will head to the Nexus 5...
Sigh... I should just go trade for an HTC One, I think... I don't know. I am torn.
The moto x isn't selling well (att rep who owns a moto x said he hasn't been able sell a single one) HTC marketing well, are you kidding? They are losing money head over heels even with the one. They only thing with LG is, they have a very small market share they are not Apple or Samsung.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
This forum seems pretty active. I think anyone who develops knows about the phone. Give it some time. Rome wasn't built in a day.
Darkestred said:
This forum seems pretty active. I think anyone who develops knows about the phone. Give it some time. Rome wasn't built in a day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Welcome to new xda forum syndrome. This is what a new device forum looks like the first week ?
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
DeaconBoogie said:
Got the G2 on launch day from a Verizon store here in town. Phone is great, no doubt about that. What worries me is that this appears to be a hero phone without much demand. HTC has done a great job of marketing the One, and everyone knows Moto. The G2 on display at the Verizon store is jammed between an iPhone and an older model Samsung something-or-other with no signage other than a huge "Samsung Galaxy" poster on the wall behind it.
If I keep this, it will be the third device in a row that I've bought as a "flagship" which wound up getting the cold shoulder in many ways.
First I had the HTC Incredible, probably the most popular of the bunch. While it did have ROM development, it was quickly forgotten when the HTC EVO came out seemingly a week later. Accessories were few and far between.
Second was the Galaxy Nexus, heralded as a "Google experience" device on Verizon. After endless launch delays, it came out and was quickly forgotten by Verizon and Google both. Accessories were few and far between.
Now I have the LG G2, a great device with awesome specs! I actually don't mind the Verizon/LG "skin" on this so much. But again, Verizon had to **** it up with changing the buttons and making the thing thicker. Accessories will be practically nil for this device other than the three cases from Verizon at launch. There will be countless Chinese imports that will claim to fit but will not, because the back-alley factories making this crap don't give a damn about doing anything per spec. Just make it look vaguely correct and slap a knock off hello-kitty design on the back and call 'er done! "Your Happy Plastic Partner" indeed!
I am also afraid that development will completely stall on this device because everyone will head to the Nexus 5...
Sigh... I should just go trade for an HTC One, I think... I don't know. I am torn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're worried about development checck the lg optimus g's thread its still going today http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2339403
That link is for p.a.
razball said:
If you're worried about development checck the lg optimus g's thread its still going today h://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2339403
That link is for p.a.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel the op pain I had the G pro witch I felt was the most underrated phone ever and coming from the note 2 it was way better than the note2 and the G pro was DOA LG has zero marketing as well as a very bad reputation of leaving customers out to dry as far as updates. LG makes bad ass phones no doubt but needs a lot of work in marketing and support
DaT Franchise said:
I feel the op pain I had the G pro witch I felt was the most underrated phone ever and coming from the note 2 it was way better than the note2 and the G pro was DOA LG has zero marketing as well as a very bad reputation of leaving customers out to dry as far as updates. LG makes bad ass phones no doubt but needs a lot of work in marketing and support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. That's the literal only thing that worries me... updates. Moto x I'm sure will beat g2 to updates (the other phone I have) but that's the only plus for the phone other than size.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
robstunner said:
True. That's the literal only thing that worries me... updates. Moto x I'm sure will beat g2 to updates (the other phone I have) but that's the only plus for the phone other than size.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll never own another moto, there like Apple always one or two years behind in hardware, I mean really 720p??!!! Duel core??
DaT Franchise said:
I'll never own another moto, there like Apple always one or two years behind in hardware, I mean really 720p??!!! Duel core??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs or no specs, anyone I know that has or has tried a MotoX loved it. I think whats killing them is the $199 for a 16GB non-expandable phone, sitting right next to a 32GB Galaxy S4 and HTC One for 149, the LG G2 for 199, etc.
And their goal with that phone WASNT balls to the wall specs....it was supposed to reliable and economical (but again the high price question still applies)
I have used the moto x and can tell you the 720 display and processor really are fine. The software enhancements kick total ass. That being said this phone Absolutely destroys it on every front. I absolutely hate amoled. Way too dim.
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk 4
chrisexv6 said:
Specs or no specs, anyone I know that has or has tried a MotoX loved it. I think whats killing them is the $199 for a 16GB non-expandable phone, sitting right next to a 32GB Galaxy S4 and HTC One for 149, the LG G2 for 199, etc.
And their goal with that phone WASNT balls to the wall specs....it was supposed to reliable and economical (but again the high price question still applies)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with u on price, but every moto sense the OG X has been one step behind with there flagship phones
chrisexv6 said:
Specs or no specs, anyone I know that has or has tried a MotoX loved it. I think whats killing them is the $199 for a 16GB non-expandable phone, sitting right next to a 32GB Galaxy S4 and HTC One for 149, the LG G2 for 199, etc.
And their goal with that phone WASNT balls to the wall specs....it was supposed to reliable and economical (but again the high price question still applies)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Everything is fine with the moto x, and I'd still be using it if the battery was decent but lately I've been getting idle drain that I can't figure out. As for amoled, it's great indoors, terrible outside. If LG steps their game up with update frequency I have no problem keeping this phone for a long time. Same goes for the moto x if I was somehow getting the 5+ hours of screen on time per day some people are reporting. Oh, and one grip with lg. Why is there not an option to make the buttons on the bottom like aosp to have the recent apps button and not just the menu...
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
If the LG G2 dont get rom support and community love i'll be surprised. I say this because its a flagship device from LG and available on all 4 major carriers; just like the htc one, galaxy phones & moto x. We just need a unlocked bootloader.
krazie1 said:
If the LG G2 dont get rom support and community love i'll be surprised. I say this because its a flagship device from LG and available on all 4 major carriers; just like the htc one, galaxy phones & moto x. We just need a unlocked bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the fact that they aren't as high profile as the other brands might mean it's easier to unlock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
krazie1 said:
If the LG G2 dont get rom support and community love i'll be surprised. I say this because its a flagship device from LG and available on all 4 major carriers; just like the htc one, galaxy phones & moto x. We just need a unlocked bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so, it was sad to see the G pro DOA. I'm still holding out to see what Scott does, I'm sure the FreeG guys will get the bootloader bypassed
DeaconBoogie said:
Sigh... I should just go trade for an HTC One, I think... I don't know. I am torn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you do NOT want an HTC One. I just sold my One for the G2...the G2 completely destroys the One in every way except for speakers and construction material, which are two minor things IMO since I prefer using headphones and the G2 feels solid/premium even though it's not metal. The One IS a great phone, but not as great as the G2. I really don't care if the G2 isn't bought in mass by the masses because I know I have a great phone and that's all that matters. I will be a little disappointed if there aren't many custom roms, but I'm OK with that because the stock rom is super smooth and customizable, plus I will be less tempted to constantly swap roms if there aren't many available
robstunner said:
. Oh, and one grip with lg. Why is there not an option to make the buttons on the bottom like aosp to have the recent apps button and not just the menu...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it's just me, but I'm starting to like the menu button instead of the multi tasking one. I don't have to look around for that 3 dot menu button on the screen anymore.
chrisexv6 said:
And the fact that they aren't as high profile as the other brands might mean it's easier to unlock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wishful thinking, but if its true I'm an LG fan from now on. Maybe since they made and/or making the new nexus they are more lenient to unlocked bootloaders?
SysAdmNj said:
Wishful thinking, but if its true I'm an LG fan from now on. Maybe since they made and/or making the new nexus they are more lenient to unlocked bootloaders?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I think the blame for locked bootloaders falls on the carriers, not the manufacturer. S4 is unlocked but not on VZW, etc.
LG will do whatever VZW tells them (or lets them). But VZW may not care if they really dont think this phone will sell well, or if they arent marketing it very much (which, as we can tell, they are NOT)
chrisexv6 said:
Actually I think the blame for locked bootloaders falls on the carriers, not the manufacturer. S4 is unlocked but not on VZW, etc.
LG will do whatever VZW tells them (or lets them). But VZW may not care if they really dont think this phone will sell well, or if they arent marketing it very much (which, as we can tell, they are NOT)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They aren't marketing it AT ALL. I've seen some Droid Maxx commercials though and an even recent Moto X commercial but zero for the LG G2.