My ciq plea to LG - G2 General

Winning. I was able to get an Advanced Tech support rep to admit they were wrong. She walked me through rooting my phone and voiding my warranty to freeze Carrier IQ. She then added insurance to my account free of charge and gave me a credit for $150 on my account to cover the insurance deductible if needed in the future. Attached is proof.
This has turned into a full on assault toward AT&T. Here is the link to file a complaint to the FCC. I have submitted my contract, the details page about the lg g2 from AT&T's website neither which states that carrier IQ or any other software is installed to monitor location or network data. Also attach was a chat log with an AT&T rep who admitted openly that it was not in my contract or listed anywhere that carrier IQ would be installed on our devices.I have also Filed a small claims complaint in with my local court which has a 500$ maximum claim amount. I am seeking the max with the reasoning that the only way to not be affected is to buy another phone.I expect AT&T to be a no show. Please unite and file an fcc complaint for concealing software capable of providing your location without consent.
https://esupport.fcc.gov/ccmsforms/form2000.action?form_type=2000B
Here is the facebook link. I need to do more work to it when I get time. https://www.facebook.com/supportpacs
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app

Posted this to the official lg mobile USA page.
LG. I must say since I picked up the g2 life has been great. I have but one issue with my phone and I am on my knees begging you for help. My troubles all began when I powered on my at&t branded device. I struggled with a very annoying wake lock that would randomly deplete my battery. I have traced the culprit which I have found to be carrier iq also known as ciq. I understand this spyware was installed at the request of my carrier so they can track usage data and trouble shoot network issues. I just feel lg should allow customers to have the ability to opt out or disable this software. Did you know that if I have network location set to off carrier iq will turn on my GPS to obtain my location. Now imagine this, you work in a secure facility with metal doors and no windows in the basement of a government entity. Your GPS turns on constantly without your control eating away at your battery trying to obtain a location. So I ask you only for this lg. Please work with the American carriers to give your customers the freedom to choose. Isn't it bad enough we have Obama and the NSA spying on us. Sincerly Christopher
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app

If you are talking about US models, the T-mobile variant allows you to disable carrierIQ in the settings.

Intub8 said:
I doubt it will do any good but I wanted to share my plea to lg in hopes for an option to disable carrier iq on the US models like AT&T. I know carrier iq Is installed at the request of the carriers but I believe LG will support us if we unite. The voice of one will not be heard. I will be reaching out to lg customers on other devices and carriers far beyond xda. I will keep this post updated with links for Facebook,YouTube and other social networking sites. Please support me as I fight for your freedom to choose weather or not to enable carrier IQ.
I am in the process of creating a Facebook page with the intention of raising awareness for all of the users who have no idea what carrier iq Is.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got my support. Where do I sign?

HeXaLox said:
You got my support. Where do I sign?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can simply share the Facebook page. When I finish it I will post the link. I am factory restoring my pc so probably in the morning. I will also create a web page.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app

Got my support too
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk

Save that on Facebook's, I can tell you are a 911 dispatcher.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app

xcaliburpcs said:
Save that on Facebook's, I can tell you are a 911 dispatcher.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are correct.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app

You didn't really say Obama and the NSA spying on us did you? No ciq on my G2!

neugenusis said:
If you are talking about US models, the T-mobile variant allows you to disable carrierIQ in the settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the T-Mobile version, please elaborate. I can't find how to disable that. Thanks
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app

This isn't done at the LG level. This is done at the Carrier level.
The Verizon version doesn't even have CIQ.
This would be a plea to the carriers like ATT... and good luck w/ that.

digitard said:
This isn't done at the LG level. This is done at the Carrier level.
The Verizon version doesn't even have CIQ.
This would be a plea to the carriers like ATT... and good luck w/ that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG installed ciq at the request of att. Lg is the one who can pressure att to give us the option to disable it like t mobile.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app

Exactly. They installed it at ATT's behest. They don't install it by default. They installed it because it's part of ATT's custom package they load on top of the LG base.
Like all carriers they install their own custom bloat on top of the base, and that was part of ATT's. They're not going to pressure ATT to remove it because it's ATT's call. T-Mo chose to install it, but give a disable option. It's all controlled by the carriers installation package.
If anything it's ATT who needs to be pressured so the 4.4 build doesn't have it bloated in.

Intub8 said:
LG installed ciq at the request of att. Lg is the one who can pressure att to give us the option to disable it like t mobile.
Sent from my LG-D800 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the T-Mobile version but can't find in settings where to disable it. WTH?
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app

bigox said:
I have the T-Mobile version but can't find in settings where to disable it. WTH?
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the late reply
Per T-mobile:
Settings > Backup & Reset > Collect diagnostics.... then uncheck "allow diagnostics"
BetterBatteryStats recorded carrierIQ as a wakelock, but after doing the above method, that wakelock was no more.

One gripe I have w this phone is the CIQ. They should at least let us have the option to disable it.
Sent from my G2

bigox said:
I have the T-Mobile version, please elaborate. I can't find how to disable that. Thanks
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
System settings > backup and reset > collect diagnostics and turn it off.

Semantics said:
System settings > backup and reset > collect diagnostics and turn it off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We should rather ask for unlocked bootloader. CIQ can be easily disabled/removed

Does sprint use CIQ?
Sent from my TouchPad using Tapatalk 4

ericdabbs said:
Does sprint use CIQ?
Sent from my TouchPad using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe they do , they discontinued using it after all the lawsuits started.

Related

[Q] This real?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110725877940&ssPageName=ADME:X:RTQ:US:1123
I dont believe him, I contacted him and he said
"It is not impossible. I have sold 3 on ebay already and I have one that I own myself that is flashed to boost. If you are interested in buying one please contact me if not then have a great day"
I have flashed HTC Incredibles, Evo's, Shifts, and Galaxies, but the 3D is out of the question.
Why is the 3d out of the question?
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
The 3D has been flashed to other carriers.
I've seen a few shops here selling 3D's on a carrier called Cricket. Not sure about Boost but I don't see how it's out of the realm of possibility.
The 3D should be impossible because Htc made it so once a scan For ESN and MEID locations start that it will hide it automatically. I forgot the encryption type they use but I know you can't scan it, (google it if u don't believe me) so only way to zero out the esn is by manually finding it by looking through trillions of esn and MEID locations.
Therefore it can only mean is fake he claims he has sold but has no history of selling any.
Trust me if that were possible I would be one of the first ones to find out because not even in download mode I'm I able to scan for locations.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Saviazi said:
I've seen a few shops here selling 3D's on a carrier called Cricket. Not sure about Boost but I don't see how it's out of the realm of possibility.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cricket is possible because they accept the bad esn and enter it in their system but to change to Boost Mobile will not work since u need to clone a phone into it.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
eljean said:
Cricket is possible because they accept the bad esn and enter it in their system but to change to Boost Mobile will not work since u need to clone a phone into it.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh interesting. Yeah the guy's claims sound kind of suspect then..
Thanks for explaining it!
I think that's kind of over priced do those have clean esn's
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
nuggyunlimited said:
I think that's kind of over priced do those have clean esn's
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Supposedly is flashed to Boost Mobile.

Q: Caller ID? Any bypass on this?

Its expiring any loopholes? Lol
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
You do realize that this is prohibited on xda, right?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
najaboy said:
You do realize that this is prohibited on xda, right?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to cause trouble but how is that any different then the Tether Hack?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2305118
That's an interesting point made. While certainly not apples to apples... the tethering hacks are 'stealing' from the carrier, just as warez 'steals' from the developers.
\
bkhorn said:
Not to cause trouble but how is that any different then the Tether Hack?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2305118
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The tether hack is merely a t&c violation which is in a gray area. While there are those that abuse it, many folks using it actually use less data than those of us on tiered plans. There exists an argument that they are already paying for the data that they are using.
Conversely, what the op is looking for is theft of a paid subscription service, and is not a t&c violation. There is no gray area- it's a paid service for any and all who use itbeyond the trial.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Personally they are both almost the same. Tether plan costs higher than the caller ID plan though. Lol
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
This is a interesting line and a good point to bring up. As I understand where both parties are coming from. Tether is also a paid service so is this caller iD app. To me it falls under the same category... Fine line idk?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Root and remove the APK?
Disable the app from Settings / Applications?
gotroot801 said:
Root and remove the APK?
Disable the app from Settings / Applications?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The op wants to know if there's a way to bypass the subscription
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
jimmiem said:
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's weird still is that I liked the trial enough to purchase it for $3/month. I get alot of calls and realized how nice it was to know what company was calling, etc, when they have multiple numbers that they dial out from. I installed a new ROM which was debloated and it didn't have the app; I tried searching for the apps name to download it again, just to have what I'm paying for but couldn't find it. Without the app, I still get full caller id info, just no options to add it to my contacts. I realized it must be getting turned on @ Verizon, since they are billing me for the services.
This leads me to believe the app is just for adding contacts etc, so I'm guessing that "IF SOMEONE WAS SEARCHING FOR A H**K", which violates xda rules, that its probably pointless. I decided its just another $3/month, which is worth it and cheaper then a landline caller ID service.
I'm a Nurse, not a hacker or developer ( which I know are completely different things ) so this is JUST MY EDUCATED GUESS
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 11:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 PM ----------
If anyone could upload the app for me, I would greatly appreciate it. I know I can just download a stock ROM, that's not debloated and grab it, but thats a 2 hour download of 1.2gigs, just for the app since I can't locate the same app anywhere I've looked; and yes I HAVE SEARCHED FOR IT.
THANK YOU !!!
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Tada10 said:
Personally they are both almost the same. Tether plan costs higher than the caller ID plan though. Lol
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you being double charged for caller id? The people using the tether hack are already paying for their data.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
najaboy said:
Are you being double charged for caller id? The people using the tether hack are already paying for their data.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If on unlimited data, paying for data only and tethering for free isn't an option from VZW. It's their policy whether we like it or not. I hate it but I pay for it.
Mayze23 said:
If on unlimited data, paying for data only and tethering for free isn't an option from VZW. It's their policy whether we like it or not. I hate it but I pay for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I concur which is why I'm on a share everything plan. I tetheroccasionally anddon't usemore than8 GB a monthBergen all of our devices. Verizon is legally obligated to provide it to tiered customers at no extra charge, but still hits customers on the legacy unlimited plan with the fee.
That being said, is there a realistic difference between a customer who is on a tiered 4 GB plan who tethers and one who is on an unlimited plan who uses 3GB a month including occasionally tethering a tablet? Verizon's justificationto the FCC is that there exists the "potential" for unlimited customers to use a large amount of data.
As I've said, it amounts to a mere t&c violation for using their already paid for data in a manner that Verizon has said that is free only if they pay for less data.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
jimmiem said:
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here.
najaboy said:
I concur which is why I'm on a share everything plan. I tetheroccasionally anddon't usemore than8 GB a monthBergen all of our devices. Verizon is legally obligated to provide it to tiered customers at no extra charge, but still hits customers on the legacy unlimited plan with the fee.
That being said, is there a realistic difference between a customer who is on a tiered 4 GB plan who tethers and one who is on an unlimited plan who uses 3GB a month including occasionally tethering a tablet? Verizon's justificationto the FCC is that there exists the "potential" for unlimited customers to use a large amount of data.
As I've said, it amounts to a mere t&c violation for using their already paid for data in a manner that Verizon has said that is free only if they pay for less data.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's actually a pretty strong legal argument that they can't charge extra for tethering to anyone, but that is off topic here.
Also, violating a contract is not illegal (i.e. criminal) or in my opinion, immoral. Theft of service is...and that is what we are talking about here.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
brizey said:
There's actually a pretty strong legal argument that they can't charge extra for tethering to anyone, but that is off topic here.
Also, violating a contract is not illegal (i.e. criminal) or in my opinion, immoral. Theft of service is...and that is what we are talking about here.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, since the topic of this thread is verboten, we may as well go with the tangent...
I suspect you're going in the direction of the Block C restriction. The FCC has expressly given Verizon the green light to charge unlimited customers for tethering in the consent decree that was issued last summer.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
jimmiem said:
I froze this app but I'm still getting full caller ID info. It's been two weeks since I got my phone.
Is it possible that freezing the app prevented this from getting shut off after the trial somehow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I froze it with Rom Toolbox Pro hope it works lol thanks
Sent from my Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk
Discovered thread City Caller ID (free old app - same as payware CityID)
I discovered old thread in HTC Droid Incredible forums about this.
City Caller ID (free old app - same as payware CityID)
brizey said:
There's actually a pretty strong legal argument that they can't charge extra for tethering to anyone, but that is off topic here.
Also, violating a contract is not illegal (i.e. criminal) or in my opinion, immoral. Theft of service is...and that is what we are talking about here.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree.....all you're doing is turning you're phone into a router to use the data that you're already receiving to the phone. A theft of service would apply that you are receiving additional data, which you are not....... you're pulling the same data to you're phone regardless its in tethering mode or not

Moonshine Download Limit Reached - Not Carrier Related

Apparently due to some misinformation I've seen in a lot of threads people claiming that the max download reached error must be a Verizon conspiracy.
I'm just posting here to let you know that it's not because of a VZW ninja sense, it's not related to the user and will be addressed shortly I'm soon.
I just didn't want the rumors of Verizon causing an interwebzt or host related error to keep spreading.
I would love it if I'm internet famous enough to say that Verizon got traced the IP address of CharliesTheMan, worked backwards through proxy connections then got a court order to subpoena my ISP records and injunction to alter my host file or reroute my interwebz..
I'm sure there's some new users that are already wrapping their phones in tinfoil before heading out to wrap the house, but I think you'll find the issue lies elsewhere. I'm not in anyway related to moonshine I just couldn't let such rubbish take hold.
Oddly enough I figured it for a host issue, go figure. Verizon never crossed my mind.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - Carbon
really Verizon hacked the server ..rofl
Of course it's a server issues, the issue is for all Moonshine downloads. Looks like hosting had a limit on number of mb's/gb's being downloaded and that has been reached.
Not sure how people come up with ideas like Verizon hacked
it's the nsa
jbarcus81 said:
it's the nsa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Microsoft.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - Carbon
Verizon hired Anonymous
sent from a white nexus 4
just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean there's not somebody out to get you
If I ran Verizon I would
- lock down the bootloader on my best phone,
- fill the DNA's limited storage with unwanted bloatware,
- deny my oldest customers with unlimited data plans the ability to use their data via wireless tether,
- flood the Moonshine server with enough bogus downloads to keep customers from rooting their phones and thwarting my brilliant business plans.
Note: I'm not saying Verizon would do any of this; it's just what I would do if I ran Verizon...
headdead said:
If I ran Verizon I would
- lock down the bootloader on my best phone,
- fill the DNA's limited storage with unwanted bloatware,
- deny my oldest customers with unlimited data plans the ability to use their data via wireless tether,
- flood the Moonshine server with enough bogus downloads to keep customers from rooting their phones and thwarting my brilliant business plans.
Note: I'm not saying Verizon would do any of this; it's just what I would do if I ran Verizon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you run Verizon?!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
John58543 said:
Do you run Verizon?!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, Yes I Do.
Sent from my SGH-T769 using xda app-developers app
Jserrano56 said:
Yes, Yes I Do.
Sent from my SGH-T769 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not verizon. Its the government man
Plot twist.... I run that too
Sent from my SGH-T769 using xda app-developers app
Jserrano56 said:
Plot twist.... I run that too
Sent from my SGH-T769 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plot twist.... I am my father.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - Carbon
pio_masaki said:
Plot twist.... I am my father.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - Carbon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:what:
Sent from my SGH-T769 using xda app-developers app
wireman2161 said:
Its not verizon. Its the government man
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That means... Verizon is the government?! And that pia is the father
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 4 Beta
downloads are back up now and windows support added

Getting Asurion replacement. Need to return to stock?

I dropped my phone today and cracked the screen in several places. I just got it rooted/S-Off. Do I need to return it to stock before sending it to Asurion?
RyanTX said:
I dropped my phone today and cracked the screen in several places. I just got it rooted/S-Off. Do I need to return it to stock before sending it to Asurion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need to return to stock, they don't care.
Say you lost it and keep it.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
booked said:
Say you lost it and keep it.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they don't care just send it to them
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda premium
Thanks guys. That will make it much easier!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 4 Beta
booked said:
Say you lost it and keep it.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's called insurance fraud and is illegal. People like you are why all of our rates are higher.
drumz0rz said:
That's called insurance fraud and is illegal. People like you are why all of our rates are higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they are not. Corporate greed is what you should be looking at lol, not bogus insurance claims...
Fraud and greed are both bad. Didnt your mother teach you two wrongs dont make a right?
booked said:
Say you lost it and keep it.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You won't be able to reactivate the old one anyway...as soon as you make a claim, it puts the old device on the negative list for activation, so the IMEI will be disabled by Verizon.
J.Max said:
You won't be able to reactivate the old one anyway...as soon as you make a claim, it puts the old device on the negative list for activation, so the IMEI will be disabled by Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He could always fix the screen and use it as a mini tablet around the house.
Dedicated bathroom device??
Cobra04 said:
He could always fix the screen and use it as a mini tablet around the house.
Dedicated bathroom device??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or a gsm device, being blacklisted on vzw doesn't affect T-Mobile or any other gsm carrier.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
booked said:
Say you lost it and keep it.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most insurance plans require a police report to be filed for the lost phone, so you'd have to falsify that as well. Doesn't like a good idea in general.
I wonder how ensquared handles the software bit as well.
I told them I lost it and I know used that crack phone in GSM. Now I have someone that can fix your phone at a good prices?
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 4 Beta
J.Max said:
You won't be able to reactivate the old one anyway...as soon as you make a claim, it puts the old device on the negative list for activation, so the IMEI will be disabled by Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get them off the blacklist and reactivated for like 70 or so
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
skeet43169 said:
You can get them off the blacklist and reactivated for like 70 or so
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not on Verizon...that's how they keep stolen phones off the network.
J.Max said:
Not on Verizon...that's how they keep stolen phones off the network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not tru I can't say who on here but look it up even 20% employee discount
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
skeet43169 said:
Not tru I can't say who on here but look it up even 20% employee discount
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If someone tells you they can get a phone off of the stolen phone negative list, they either work for Asurion (and they're acting illegally), work for a VERY specific team at Verizon (and puttng their job in jeopardy to make $70), or flashing a different IMEI to the phone (which is illegal and causes other problems down the line). All phones on Verizon are indexed, meaning that the company has a record of each phone's serial number, and that's what's allowed on the network. If a phone is in the "negative" index list, it can't be activated unless it's moved on to the regular list, and the only people that can do that are Verizon employees on the indexing/inventory team, or Asurion reps who have to go through a pretty long process to have it re-indexed.
On a GSM network, none of this is a problem, because the only thing the network cares about is the SIM/ICC number.
J.Max said:
If someone tells you they can get a phone off of the stolen phone negative list, they either work for Asurion (and they're acting illegally), work for a VERY specific team at Verizon (and puttng their job in jeopardy to make $70), or flashing a different IMEI to the phone (which is illegal and causes other problems down the line). All phones on Verizon are indexed, meaning that the company has a record of each phone's serial number, and that's what's allowed on the network. If a phone is in the "negative" index list, it can't be activated unless it's moved on to the regular list, and the only people that can do that are Verizon employees on the indexing/inventory team, or Asurion reps who have to go through a pretty long process to have it re-indexed.
On a GSM network, none of this is a problem, because the only thing the network cares about is the SIM/ICC number.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are incorrect I emailed a thunderbolt imei they emailed me a pay pal link I paid them they emailedme back saying it was clean I called Verizon have them the number and they conformed it was ok you should never assume Google is your friend the site states it's 100% legal
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
skeet43169 said:
You are incorrect I emailed a thunderbolt imei they emailed me a pay pal link I paid them they emailedme back saying it was clean I called Verizon have them the number and they conformed it was ok you should never assume Google is your friend the site states it's 100% legal
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not if it was stolen and someone made a claim through Asurion.
Google has bad information too.
J.Max said:
Not if it was stolen and someone made a claim through Asurion.
Google has bad information too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes lost stone even if it's locked in a unpaid account
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app

Please delete this thread

Please delete this thread
angel.mariano said:
I think we still have hope
http://www.droid-life.com/2013/09/17/google-introduces-new-google-wallet-app-for-all-android-phones/
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google wallet is working on my HTC One
It doesn't work for tap-n-pay, so it's of no use to me.
ingenious247 said:
It doesn't work for tap-n-pay, so it's of no use to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont u think it will be easier to get it to work now? Im sure it will be
Absolutely not. This does not address anything needed to solve the no secure element issue.
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
ingenious247 said:
Absolutely not. This does not address anything needed to solve the no secure element issue.
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Its like ppl forgot the whole thread talking about that . nobsecure element no tap to pay.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
I gave up on Google Wallet for my phones. I've installed ISIS on my Verizon Droid Maxx; and it's okay. Accepted everywhere Wallet was here in Los Angeles, which is to say not many places. Not as good as Wallet in terms of seeing your purchase receipts on the phone, and limited credit cards, but it uses Amex, which is all I ever use.
I'd be happy to install ISIS on my T-Mo HTC One, but of course, T-Mo is way behind Verizon in rolling it out nationally. My VZW Maxx came with an ISIS SIM, and you can order one on VZW website. T-Mo still makes you go to a T-Mo store in Austin or SLC. <sigh>
I'm going to file complaint with the FTC. The Verizon users are filing against VZW with the FCC, since part of their LTE spectrum deal was that they would not block users from installing any apps on their phones.

Categories

Resources