A growing number of people are claiming that their OMATE TRUESMART's maximum CPU speed
is being reported by some popular HW apps to be 1.0GHz
....not the 1.3GHz as noted in the specs.
At the time if this post, a relatively small number of TS's have reported this discrepancy. BUT, in comparison to the number of TS's currently in circulation...this needs to be addressed in order to determine if it's a possible defect, or issues in the source code.
To scan your TS, you can use:
CPU-z
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cpuid.cpu_z
CPUspy
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bvalosek.cpuspy
Hardware Info
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dama.hardwareinfo
To get a SCREENSHOT of the report:
Hold BOTH top and bottom buttons simultaneously for 1 sec.
POST YOUR RESULTS HERE
XDA Members & Identified 1.0GHz TRUESMART's
FEB 16 2014
Xda member: mghtymse007
Screenshot: yes
Max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: stock 20140120 w/patch
xda member: BurnQc
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: Imperium_Operative_v1.1.0_V2.0,
xda member: kiesman0
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
xda member: jhax01
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
xda member: Quension
screenshotL no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
xda member: trent999
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
xda member: Neosolidus
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120
xda member: robowald
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
xda member: fg
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: (PLEASE PROVIDE)
Update 2/18/2014
xda member: pkshr
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1
Firmware: 20140120
xda member: rawr
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120 and Imperium 1.1.0
xda member: mety333
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1
Firmware: 20140120
xda member: x86cpu
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120
xda member: jonpaul
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120
xda member: vagelis
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120
xda member: jcfitz
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20131207
xda member: jwheeler73
screenshot: yes
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: Imperium 1.1.0
xda member: bucho54
screenshot: no
max freq: 1.0GHz
Model: NA1900, 1/8
Firmware: 20140120
NA 1900 1/8
20140120.15 4604_V2.0
stock/pre patch
Mine shows 1ghz as well, but honestly, I could care less. It works and I'm sure I could overclock it if I really felt the need...
Model - N/A 1/8 - (Nov Dev)
ROM - Imperium Operative v1.1.0 v2
App - Cpu Z
Max clock - 1 ghz
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Mine shows 1gHz too. You don't care, OK, but the device was promoted as 1.3gHz on KickStarter and is being sold to pre-orders as 1.3gHz dual core.
It is wrong to advertise as a 1.3gHz devise but deliver a 1.0 GHz device. Imagine if Samsung did that...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
trent999 said:
Mine shows 1gHz too. You don't care, OK, but the device was promoted as 1.3gHz on KickStarter and is being sold to pre-orders as 1.3gHz dual core.
It is wrong to advertise as a 1.3gHz devise but deliver a 1.0 GHz device. Imagine if Samsung did that...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are looking at it the wrong way. There are many others that do not have this issue. If the majority of x201 users are running at 1.3GHz then those running at 1.0GHz are problematic units that needs to be brought to the attention of whom ever you got them through.
@trent999 Can you post a screenshot? PM if you're having trouble.
I'm with you on this one...1366MHz is quite different than 1001MHz...its one of the reasons I held off getting a SimValley.
BUT..AT THIS TIME, we know very little....IF and ONLY IF, this was a PROVEN, deliberate action taken by Omate, can we begin to sling mud.
Lets keep this thread to the facts, for now. Once we have more information, a more educated conclusion will be drawn.
trent999 said:
Mine shows 1gHz too. You don't care, OK, but the device was promoted as 1.3gHz on KickStarter and is being sold to pre-orders as 1.3gHz dual core.
It is wrong to advertise as a 1.3gHz devise but deliver a 1.0 GHz device. Imagine if Samsung did that...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough. I added my data point for the benefit of others, my opinion was not requested but a freebie. At this point, I have no confidence Omate would do anything about it that I would consider timely or convenient so I'm simply saying that I'm willing to accept the discrepancy for a KS project. Omate is not Samsung, nor do I expect them to be any time soon. I don't get mad at kids running a lemonade stand that promises fresh organic lemons, but provides a concentrate and tap water either. I just accept it and move on. Clearly that's not right for everyone, but it is for me and that's all I was trying to convey. Peace...
---------- Post added at 01:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------
I'd also like to point out that my device is not in a stock condition. It is running loki's rom. That may have nothing to do with anything, but if I were a manufacturer, I would ask what modifications have been made. Just something to consider when data collecting. On the flip side, does anyone have a screen shot of one running at 1.3??
jhax01 said:
I'd also like to point out that my device is not in a stock condition. It is running loki's rom. That may have nothing to do with anything, but if I were a manufacturer, I would ask what modifications have been made. Just something to consider when data collecting. On the flip side, does anyone have a screen shot of one running at 1.3??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omate is well aware of the changes made as we have discussed all the changes. LLP himself runs my work as well as others at Omate. And even though I do not list every individual file change in the ROM or Patch thread, the list is fairly detailed. As far as the Patch vs the ROM, there is very little core difference between the two.
On a further note, the 1GHz unit I did get my hands on was running at 1GHZ without any modifications at all.
Lokifish Marz said:
Omate is well aware of the changes made as we have discussed all the changes. LLP himself runs my work as well as others at Omate. And even though I do not list every individual file change in the ROM or Patch thread, the list is fairly detailed. As far as the Patch vs the ROM, there is very little core difference between the two.
On a further note, the 1GHz unit I did get my hands on was running at 1GHZ without any modifications at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So if my device reports 1gHz It's a problem? Damn it, mine says 1gHz and always has. I just figured it was a firmware issue.
Well we are in a pickle!
My paper weight also reports 1ghz on stock 20140120.
I noticed the 1ghz as soon as i got it but assumed Omate did some ninja changes to the stock firmware to improve battery(limiting the CPU is the quickest and laziest way to improve battery life).
I lent my device to a friend to check it out so i can't test this but anyone with the 1GHZ device willing to flash an older firmware to rule out hardware issues?
Lokifish Marz said:
Omate is well aware of the changes made as we have discussed all the changes. LLP himself runs my work as well as others at Omate. And even though I do not list every individual file change in the ROM or Patch thread, the list is fairly detailed. As far as the Patch vs the ROM, there is very little core difference between the two.
On a further note, the 1GHz unit I did get my hands on was running at 1GHZ without any modifications at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was in no way suggesting that it was somehow attributable to your ROM, but I have been around the block a few times and have seen very strange behavior and results from the simple act of flashing in and of itself with all other things being equal. In my particular case, my gut tells me that the chip was not up to spec and was downgraded by the manufacturer, yet installed anyway even though it couldn't meet minimum spec. It happens, and I've seen it happen with the big guys too, HTC in my own experience, but I'm sure there are others. Most people never know...
Neosolidus said:
Well we are in a pickle!
My paper weight also reports 1ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, I'm still waiting for a screenshot showing 1.3!! Lol...maybe it is firmware, an attempt at extending battery life...
jhax01 said:
Like I said, I'm still waiting for a screenshot showing 1.3!! Lol...maybe it is firmware, an attempt at extending battery life...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently on a test build for the fixed official firmware by me but flashing back to full stock Jan20 firmware to pull a 1.3GHz screencap right now.
Update
Stock Jan20 firmware screencap now attached. I'll hold off doing any firmware work in case somebody needs more info from stock firmware.
Model- PR 512/4 2100
Firmware/ROM- Stock 20140120
App used- Z-Device Test (also show 1.3GHz five other apps as well)
Max clock listed by app- 1.3GHz
using cpu-z I get 1 core at 598 Mhz (clock speed 598Mhz- 1.00GHz) and 1 core stopped
November Dev unit 1g/8g
US Bands
Stock with Patch
App Used: CPU-Z
Max Core Speed: 1GHz
jhax01 said:
Fair enough. I added my data point for the benefit of others, my opinion was not requested but a freebie. At this point, I have no confidence Omate would do anything about it that I would consider timely or convenient so I'm simply saying that I'm willing to accept the discrepancy for a KS project. Omate is not Samsung, nor do I expect them to be any time soon. I don't get mad at kids running a lemonade stand that promises fresh organic lemons, but provides a concentrate and tap water either. I just accept it and move on. Clearly that's not right for everyone, but it is for me and that's all I was trying to convey. Peace...
---------- Post added at 01:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------
I'd also like to point out that my device is not in a stock condition. It is running loki's rom. That may have nothing to do with anything, but if I were a manufacturer, I would ask what modifications have been made. Just something to consider when data collecting. On the flip side, does anyone have a screen shot of one running at 1.3??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I'm also running stock, by the way.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
In case this becomes a long thread and to keep data accurate I'd like to request the following;
Reporting device uses the following template
Model- (PR 512/4, EU 512/4, NA 1/8, EU 1/8)
Firmware/ROM- (located in Settings/System/About at the very bottom)
App used-
Max clock listed by app-
Attach a screenshot
Also like to request that the OP keep a tally of this info update (with a date attached) in the OP.
just checked, count another NA1900 1/8 model with 1ghz max cpu. stock omate jan2014 firmware.
Lokifish Marz said:
In case this becomes a long thread and to keep data accurate I'd like to request the following;
Reporting device uses the following template
Model- (PR 512/4, EU 512/4, NA 1/8, EU 1/8)
Firmware/ROM- (located in Settings/System/About at the very bottom)
App used-
Max clock listed by app-
Attach a screenshot
Also like to request that the OP keep a tally of this info update (with a date attached) in the OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do...
ANYONE WHO HAS ALREADY POSTED THEIR RESULTS, PLEASE POST WHICH TS YOU HAVE. THANKS
Model- ( NA 1/8 KS Dec "Dev"edition )
Firmware/ROM- (20140120 Firmware)
App used- CPU-Z
Max clock listed by app- 1001(598-1001)
Attach a screenshot(lent the device to a friend to check it out so won't have access to the SS for a while)
Related
So there were rumors that we'd not get the Hummingbird CPU here in the U.S. with our "Galaxy S phones" and after running the app Quadrant Standard, I'm a little confused. Here's the results that confuse me and it could be a simple lack of my knowledge so if anyone has the answer then please feel free to clue me in without flaming.
Result browser:
Device: Samsung Galaxy S
Other names: I900
CPU Name: ARM Cortex A8 (Hummingbird)
Max freq: 1000MHz
Now for me; I have a Vibrant...
Device: SGH-T959
CPU Name: ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v71)
Current freq: 400MHz
Max freq: 1000MHz
So does this mean we are NOT running the Hummingbird CPU or is the application wrong?
jonathan3579 said:
So there were rumors that we'd not get the Hummingbird CPU here in the U.S. with our "Galaxy S phones" and after running the app Quadrant Standard, I'm a little confused. Here's the results that confuse me and it could be a simple lack of my knowledge so if anyone has the answer then please feel free to clue me in without flaming.
Result browser:
Device: Samsung Galaxy S
Other names: I900
CPU Name: ARM Cortex A8 (Hummingbird)
Max freq: 1000MHz
Now for me; I have a Vibrant...
Device: SGH-T959
CPU Name: ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v71)
Current freq: 400MHz
Max freq: 1000MHz
So does this mean we are NOT running the Hummingbird CPU or is the application wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe that the arm v7 is a part of the cortex a8 family of processors, or vice versa.
greengoldmello said:
I believe that the arm v7 is a part of the cortex a8 family of processors, or vice versa.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, I wonder why the app differentiates the two CPU's like that. I'm not able to come up with much info from searching for that exact CPU name other than info on the Motorola Droid X. Go figure...
I ran the benchmark and I was interested.
I hit up ARM's website and the ARMv7 falls under the Cortex A8 platform.
Now is there a difference in CPU's between the I9000 and the Vibrant I honestly cannot say. Very Very interesting though.
I wonder if anyone with a captivate can tell us what there's says I am interested in this.
Do you guys think that Samsung could have cheapened out and gave us a crappier CPU?
EDIT: I did some digging and found out that Apples A4 processor which is pretty much a hummingbird is under the ARMv7 instruction set which is a Cortex A8 processor.
I was able to pull up the same info in regard to the iPhone 4. I found that quite interesting. However, I'm still curious about a Captivate's results. The GPU is exactly the same on the app's results but it's just the CPU thing that bugs me. Is it normal for the phone to be running at 400 MHz? I keep turning up with that same result.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
jonathan3579 said:
I was able to pull up the same info in regard to the iPhone 4. I found that quite interesting. However, I'm still curious about a Captivate's results. The GPU is exactly the same on the app's results but it's just the CPU thing that bugs me. Is it normal for the phone to be running at 400 MHz? I keep turning up with that same result.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The processor will throttle itself based on demand, so yes it is totally normal to see a number less than 1000MHz
jonathan3579 said:
Now for me; I have a Vibrant...
Device: SGH-T959
CPU Name: ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v71)
Current freq: 400MHz
Max freq: 1000MHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Vibrant shows Current frequency as 1000MHz.
Let's put it this way - T-Mobile and practically all marketing for the phones states it is in fact the 1ghz hummingbird CPU. If it isn't, then it is clearly false advertising.
gsvnet said:
Let's put it this way - T-Mobile and practically all marketing for the phones states it is in fact the 1ghz hummingbird CPU. If it isn't, then it is clearly false advertising.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So do we have any definitive answers on whether it's the same CPU that EU has? I've turned up with inconclusive results.
jonathan3579 said:
Result browser:
Device: Samsung Galaxy S
Other names: I900
CPU Name: ARM Cortex A8 (Hummingbird)
Max freq: 1000MHz
Now for me; I have a Vibrant...
Device: SGH-T959
CPU Name: ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v71)
Current freq: 400MHz
Max freq: 1000MHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Cortex A8 is from the ARMv7 family of processors.
Think of it like Intel i7 family of processors, and individual processors being i7 965 or i7 920 or i3, or i5 or i9, etc. or better yet like intel processors being x86, then with all the different things they add on like mmx and hyperthreading and the like being additional instruction sets. so over time x86 gets tweaked for better performance, and the other instruction sets allow for specific tasks to be run faster. hence the difference between the different arm families. that and price tag.
any mobile processor will also dynamically clock itself based on requirements at the time. I don't know the exact frequencies because I haven't cared enough to find out, but the processor downclocks itself to something like 250mhz with the screen turned off, then up to 400mhz ish with the screen on, and then up to 800-1000mhz when running any applications or games or what have you. It does this to save battery life and not run too ungodly hot.
Laptops do the exact same thing, and desktop computers as well if you enable those settings to save on power consumption.
also the cortex a8 is just the cpu itself as far as i'm aware, that does not include the dsp nor the gpu.
ALL SGS phones run the same exact processor, Samsung's custom Hummingbird processor, with the cpu being 45nm based on the Cortex a8 (ARMv7 series) with some customizations, along with the SGX 540, i don't know what their dsp is off the top of my head though.
This is interesting!
I have an incredible. I've noticed the exact same description for my processor using two different apps. If anyone has an answer I'd love to here it!
rench32 said:
I have an incredible. I've noticed the exact same description for my processor using two different apps. If anyone has an answer I'd love to here it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon is also an ARM v7 CPU. basically ARM v7 is the CPU core, Snapdragon, OMAP, Hummingbird are all SoC(Systems on a Chip), where the CPU portion is ARM based.
Hello, I saw somewhere that Galaxy S 2 has two different processors. I bought phone on saturday and I would like to find which processor has my phone? Any advice how to find out? And also,are they same quality or are they different?
Thank you
Google search is amazing, you should try it. Xda has a search feature also. If you got a box with your handset it probably mentions which one also.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I'm not sure but i heard that the I9103 has the tegra processor but a lcd screen
Don't know if this is right or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Quick system info tells you which cpu you have among other things.
Hi I tryed but could not find anything. SO you think I should have Exynos because ihave I9100? Which one is better? I hope they are same.
PoTi_96 said:
I'm not sure but i heard that the I9103 has the tegra processor but a lcd screen
Don't know if this is right or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's rumor about a HongKong version with Tegra 2 1.2Ghz and SAMOLED plus display
Also, the FCC certification records show three different models approved for the US market:
I9100 (FCCID: A3LGTI9100)
I9100T (FCCID: A3LGTI9100T)
I9100G (FCCID: A3LGTI9100G)
I'm assuming the I9100T is the Tegra version, based on the suffix. Nothing in the publicly available docs I've looked at confirms that. The I9100G is new -- it was apparently added to the FCC site earlier today.
3waygeek said:
Also, the FCC certification records show three different models approved for the US market:
I9100 (FCCID: A3LGTI9100)
I9100T (FCCID: A3LGTI9100T)
I9100G (FCCID: A3LGTI9100G)
I'm assuming the I9100T is the Tegra version, based on the suffix. Nothing in the publicly available docs I've looked at confirms that. The I9100G is new -- it was apparently added to the FCC site earlier today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Per Engadget/pocketnow, one of those must be a CDMA variant for verizon and Sprint
So I checked info in my phone and processor is 1.2 GHz ARM V7 dual core. No Tegra.I just hope that this processor is good. I think they used ARM for Galaxy S.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
shawt said:
So I checked info in my phone and processor is 1.2 GHz ARM V7 dual core. No Tegra.I just hope that this processor is good. I think they used ARM for Galaxy S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both Tegra and Exynos are of same family.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture#ARM_cores
They maybe little different in terms of implementation. I believe the Tegra 2 is without NEON instruction sets.
May not be a strictly easy way to compare which one is better. I think the general consensus is Exynos 4210 has overall better performance compared to the Tegra2.
I would think that you have Exynos (atleast I myself would like that).
cheers..
Bukem75 said:
Per Engadget/pocketnow, one of those must be a CDMA variant for verizon and Sprint
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My guess is that it's the G version. When I looked through the FCC docs last week, it appeared to me that the I9100 & I9100T supported AT&T's set of GSM frequencies, and were, in all aspects pertaining to FCC certification, identical.
I haven't had time to look at the FCC docs for the G version, as they were put up less than 24 hours ago, but if it's a CDMA version for Sprint/Verizon, it should be readily apparent by looking at the list of certification documents (i.e. they mention CDMA frequencies instead of GSM).
Galaxy S vs. Galaxy S2
OK I am quite worry about processor in my Galaxy S 2 now. I checked Galaxy S vs. galaxy S 2. In quadrant system informaton about CPU is this :
Galaxy S
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 2(v7l)
Cores : 1
Architecture : 7
Revision : 2
Galaxy S2
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 1(v7l)
Cores : 1 ... ?!?
Architecture : 7
Revision : 1
So did they used the same processor but just changed speed??? Cores 1 ??? Maybe system info is wrong, but I think this is strange, don't you think???
Maybe thsi program is not made for Android 2.3.3 ?
Do you know which code is for CPU information?
From what I read, Quadrant cannot dual cores, and lists it as one core.
Quadrant reads the LG Optimus 2X dual core as a single core. I presume it is thus for the i9100, and any other dual core 'phone.
I tryed few app from the market and they all read same information.Hopefully I have dual core CPU...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
shawt said:
I tryed few app from the market and they all read same information.Hopefully I have dual core CPU...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the cpu speed on quadrant?
Under system information.
Current freq. : 200 MHz
Max freq. : 1200 MHz
Min freq. : 200 Mhz
Bogo MIPS : 1592.52
shawt said:
OK I am quite worry about processor in my Galaxy S 2 now. I checked Galaxy S vs. galaxy S 2. In quadrant system informaton about CPU is this :
Galaxy S
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 2(v7l)
Cores : 1
Architecture : 7
Revision : 2
Galaxy S2
Name : ARM v7 Processor rev 1(v7l)
Cores : 1 ... ?!?
Architecture : 7
Revision : 1
So did they used the same processor but just changed speed??? Cores 1 ??? Maybe system info is wrong, but I think this is strange, don't you think???
Maybe thsi program is not made for Android 2.3.3 ?
Do you know which code is for CPU information?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant just gets it wrong, don't worry your S2 is fine and does have a Dual-Core 1.2ghz processor just look at your quadrant result...3000+ you're not going to get that on a stock Kernel from any single core phone are you ?
Hope that helps you
Thank you I had about 3000 just wanted to know what type processor I have in my phone.
forgetmyname said:
From what I read, Quadrant cannot dual cores, and lists it as one core.
Quadrant reads the LG Optimus 2X dual core as a single core. I presume it is thus for the i9100, and any other dual core 'phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since KE7, quadrant is reporting 2 cores
well yours is a uk one, so we have the exynos version , which is the superior of the 2
These are super limited. They were released on the 20th on the HP site at $599 then pulled before they sold many. I am not sure why they did this. Maybe they will relist them when the last wave of HP Touchpads go for sale.
Aside from it being 1.5 GHz and having 64 GB of space, what differences are there? Think it is a higher binned CPU? Maybe it will hit 1.9 GHz easily. Perhaps it even has better cooling since it is clocked higher. I also wonder if the PCB is different. Maybe it has a USB powered 4G "slot" somewhere on it. That would be a fun mod to give the tablet a USB port with a little soldering. Hopefully they used the same PCB as the 4G version.
I get mine Tuesday. Anyone else here get one and willing to disassemble?
If you are wondering what the hell I am talking about, you can refer to the post on SD that points to a site where 200 were sold.
slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3236371
wow, white would look amazing! is the digitizer white aswell? your lucky dude! does it have 3g?
No, my understanding is that it's the same SoC as the 16/32gb version. The same thing was going to happen for the HSPA+ AT&T version.
http://forums.precentral.net/hp-touchpad/287396-tps-apq8060-cpu-ment-clocked-1-5ghz.html
This is why OC'ing to 1.5ghz is virtually danger free.
jmhalder said:
No, my understanding is that it's the same SoC as the 16/32gb version. The same thing was going to happen for the HSPA+ AT&T version.
http://forums.precentral.net/hp-touchpad/287396-tps-apq8060-cpu-ment-clocked-1-5ghz.html
This is why OC'ing to 1.5ghz is virtually danger free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.7 should be virtually risk free as well.
Dual core Scorpions have a baseline of 1.2Ghz and a max of 1.5Ghz. Anything above 1.5Ghz is a risk.
wrong the 1.2 on our cpu is under clocked. 1.5 is normal and 1.7 is a super easy 200mhz OC
tazzmissionx said:
Dual core Scorpions have a baseline of 1.2Ghz and a max of 1.5Ghz. Anything above 1.5Ghz is a risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While that may be true for some chips, its obviously not true here. No manufacturer will release a chip and use it to its max potential right off the bat. Not only is that dangerous (overheat/melting/high failure rates), but not good business sense.
All newer smartphones/tablets, especially ones running The snapdragon chip and the tegra 2 chip are ALL underclocked slightly.
In our case, HP UNDERclocked our chip. Normally it sees duty running @ 1.5ghz (as in the white TP), but they chose to run it at 1.2ghz in ours. Thats why its deemed safe to "overclock" our TP to 1.5ghz, and some like me, clock it @ 1.712.
sanvara said:
1.7 should be virtually risk free as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its possible for HP to be binning the CPUs for the 1.5ghz
(like how AMD bins the quad core CPUs. if it doesn't make the cut, disable that core and sell it as tri-core CPU)
paperWastage said:
its possible for HP to be binning the CPUs for the 1.5ghz
(like how AMD bins the quad core CPUs. if it doesn't make the cut, disable that core and sell it as tri-core CPU)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
doubt it, they wouldnt go through all that trouble..
Well, I started using it today. So far I have logging off, dev mode on, preware installed. I am not going to change the kernel because for all I know it bricks the 64GB versions. I think I will hold out until overclocking is as simple as an app like with the hd2.
If anyone has any specific questions or things that I can look up, please ask.
I've got a question - what on earth possesses someone to spend four times as much money to get a device that is a different color and comes with $10 more worth of storage?
;-)
Has anyone tried the kernel from the 64gb to the 16/32gb models?
Official speed up?
Just so I can say I have one of the super rare white ones. TBH, I tried getting the other ones and was out of luck. I was on vacation Friday-Sunday that weekend. I placed orders on Sunday night and this was the only one to go through. I was on them the second they were posted on SD. 260 shipped for a tablet that hardware wise is better than the Ipad 2 64GB is a good deal in my book. Right now it sucks for apps, but I am sure the android port will fix that within the next 6 months.
Supposedly someone has overclocked it. Go to page 41 on that thread I linked on my first post here. Someone claims to have overclocked it to 1.92 causing it to lockup. 1.7 seems stable. I guess that is no different than the 16 and 32.
Crucible1001 said:
Well, I started using it today. So far I have logging off, dev mode on, preware installed. I am not going to change the kernel because for all I know it bricks the 64GB versions. I think I will hold out until overclocking is as simple as an app like with the hd2.
If anyone has any specific questions or things that I can look up, please ask.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The touchpads are all the same except for the obvious 64 GB of space and the white shell.
Then what allowing the 64gb model to run at the stock clock and the rest running underclocked?
bigsnack said:
Then what allowing the 64gb model to run at the stock clock and the rest running underclocked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Frequency HP let them run at? 1.5 GHz is stock clocks for our processor. Which is why everyone can "OC" to it so easily. HP underclocked for battery/heat reasons.
1.84Ghz ****ers!
Nburnes said:
Frequency HP let them run at? 1.5 GHz is stock clocks for our processor. Which is why everyone can "OC" to it so easily. HP underclocked for battery/heat reasons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, then its not like in the kernel or anything HP programmed to make the 64gb run at the stock clock? Dang ya'll.
}{Alienz}{ said:
1.84Ghz ****ers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same, just more politely .
You may want to sell this baby. I saw one on ebay that had a ending bid of $820.... a couple of days ago there was one that sold for $520.
Hello,
im a new Galaxy S2 (international version) owner.
I remember quadrant reporting 1 cpu on the stock os (2.3.4) aswell, but didnt try other apps.
Rooted, then updated my device to Android 4.0.3 (ICS ressurection remix v9.6) using the safest methods avalible today (runme.bat + flash cwm via odin + flash rom via cwm)
The ROM includes this kernel: i9100XXLPH
The following applications are now reporting 1 cpu core:
Quadrant
CpuSpy
Elixir 2
Linpack
native "top" utilily, via a terminal emulator
native /proc/cpuinfo
Linpack scores 70+ MFLOPS at 1.2Ghz (multi-thread)
I can hit 4000k points on Quadrant Standard Edition aswell
Is this normal? Im confused. It's the dualcore exynos, but everything reports 1 core.
Anyone? Great forums. Cant post to real threads and here this thread just dies?
Your life must be so awesome when the biggest problem is that your benchmark programs are reporting one core.
Mine correctly reports two, when it's using enough CPU to turn it on.
Not that I ever noticed a performance difference even on GB if I forced one core offline.
Please don't make the exact same thread in two sections of the board. That won't endear you to anyone on here.
The 2nd core pops online when needed, so won't show all the time, that's normal.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Hi all.
This is my first post here so forgive me if I've put it in the wrong forum.
I recently (6 days ago) bought a new phone, Ezio i95.
It looks like Samsung Galaxy S3/S4.
The specs are:
Quad core 1,8 GHz
2 GB RAM
Dual Sim
5" Super AMOLED screen (1920x1080), 440 ppi
But... In Antutu benchmark system info it correctly says that it is 1,8 GHz CPU (1741 MHz, to be precise). But, when I do the test, it sees only 1,2 GHz. When I try any app that does cpu scaling or any other cpu work, it also sees 1,2 GHz.
I searched for it on the net, but I didn't find anything conclusive. Actually, it seems that the CPU clock is really 1,2 GHz, but I don't know why and how do they sell it as 1,8. And how the hell Antutu sees it as 1,8?!?!?!
Here are screenshots:
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/9/kocl.png/
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/5/o0ph.png/
And here is from mediatek wiki:
MT6589[a] Cortex A7 (ARMv7) 28 nm 1.2*GHz quad-core PowerVR SGX544 @ 286*MHz
Any Ideas?!
Thanks in advance.
System won't let me to post a link, because I'm new, so I tried this workaround. Hope you don't mind. I've put two spaces.
blackbeast8 said:
Hi all.
This is my first post here so forgive me if I've put it in the wrong forum.
I recently (6 days ago) bought a new phone, Ezio i95.
It looks like Samsung Galaxy S3/S4.
The specs are:
Quad core 1,8 GHz
2 GB RAM
Dual Sim
5" Super AMOLED screen (1920x1080), 440 ppi
But... In Antutu benchmark system info it correctly says that it is 1,8 GHz CPU (1741 MHz, to be precise). But, when I do the test, it sees only 1,2 GHz. When I try any app that does cpu scaling or any other cpu work, it also sees 1,2 GHz.
I searched for it on the net, but I didn't find anything conclusive. Actually, it seems that the CPU clock is really 1,2 GHz, but I don't know why and how do they sell it as 1,8. And how the hell Antutu sees it as 1,8?!?!?!
Here are screenshots:
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/9/kocl.png/
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/5/o0ph.png/
And here is from mediatek wiki:
MT6589[a] Cortex A7 (ARMv7) 28 nm 1.2*GHz quad-core PowerVR SGX544 @ 286*MHz
Any Ideas?!
Thanks in advance.
System won't let me to post a link, because I'm new, so I tried this workaround. Hope you don't mind. I've put two spaces.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not familiar with the device or the ROM you are using (stock?). But if you install cpuspy it will tell you all the freqs that are allowed and how much time your cpu spends at each freq. My guess is that the freq table goes up to 1.8GHz but that somewhere the maxfreq is set to 1.2 GHz. You might be able to up the maxfreq using an app like setcpu. The cpu you have is rated to 1.2 GHz so any overclocking you do comes with the risk that you will damage your phone. Basically if the cpu is getting hot....better back off the overclocking.
justmpm said:
I am not familiar with the device or the ROM you are using (stock?). But if you install cpuspy it will tell you all the freqs that are allowed and how much time your cpu spends at each freq. My guess is that the freq table goes up to 1.8GHz but that somewhere the maxfreq is set to 1.2 GHz. You might be able to up the maxfreq using an app like setcpu. The cpu you have is rated to 1.2 GHz so any overclocking you do comes with the risk that you will damage your phone. Basically if the cpu is getting hot....better back off the overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every app I tried, including SetCPU and CpuSpy, shows 1,2 GHz as max frequency. As you can see on screenshots, Antutu benchmark shows in system info 1,8 GHz (1741 MHz actually), but in test it uses 1,2 GHz. TBH, the only place I saw 1,8 GHz was in Antutu, not anywhere else.
I contacted the seller, and he is trying to convince me that the phone has CPU Booster and that frequency is really 1,8 GHz. I now sent him screenshots in order to convince him that he is wrong...
I researched that cpu, mt5689 and its max freq is 1,2. mt5689T is 1,5 GHz, but this one is without T.
Kernel version is 3.4.5, from 19th June this year
Baseband version: MOLY.WR8.W1248.MD.WG.MP.V6.P4, 2013/05/04
Android version is 4.2.3
I found some info about ROM: 06_v89_hydy_dangdang_gemi
h ttp://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3662/kocl.png
h ttp://img5.imageshack.us/img5/4357/o0ph.png
If that anything means to you...
I am not trying to overclock my phone, I just want to be able to use what I've payed for. I could have bought 1,2 GHz, but I payed for this one and I want to use it, that's the poing...
Unfortunately, only after I bought it, I found all this. I didn't inform myself enough, before purchasing...
Thanks anyway
The seller is still trying to convince me that the max cpu freq is 1,8 GHz, with cpu booster, but I still cannot see or use it in any app, except that Antutu benchmark sees the 1,8 GHz as max, but still uses 1,2 GHz.
Chipset and cpu is rated to 1,2 GHz, as I saw on mt6589 reviews, so I think that I am fooled...
Good morning, my name is Jorge Martinez, I am another ezio buyer i95, I arrived with several flaws, the most serious the gps it is impossible to make it work, even after following many online tutorials.
The on / off button sometimes gets caught and resets.
The headphone connection is not good and sounds bad.
Reviewed this to the salesman told me they would give me support, etc, etc, told me I was going to wait to send another new model, gave me all kinds of options, but ultimately it only to gain time.
Once you pass the time of the vote, and has forgotten all its commitments and ripped me off.
I recommend everyone to not deal with the seller, who has only good words but deceives.
I hope my mistake serve for one to be saved from falling into this trap, but also effectively tells you it's quad core 1.8, it's actually 1.2.
Greetings all, I hope this information will be useful.
Demonstrating GPS reception via Device-Z-Test app. My S3 on the left and Ezio I95 on the right.
The latter, bought through eBay, was successfully returned to the Hong Kong exporter.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4
Ezio i95 Stock rom
Any one had ezio i95 stok rom?
ezio 95
hi,
I have read that some of the specs get rewritten within the operating system to fool antutu.
However I am also after a copy of the stock rom. I have a enzio s89 that I have bricked before I made a rom copy. This ezio i95 uses the same processor and is about the same size Maybe it will work in mine.
Are you able to download MTK droid tools and make a copy of your stock rom please. That is always worth doing in any case.