i like this battery
i used before Iphone 5,
after some hours phone was dead
this one stay and stay
almost 24H
i really like this phone
its nice isnt it
There are about 3 other threads on this
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
who carez! this phone is so amaze
many knock knock
such weatherlockscreen
wow
My battery is nice, too.
Sent from my LG-D803 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
saggyballs89 said:
My battery is nice, too.
Sent from my LG-D803 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine too, has green eyes, glossy hair .....
If you think the G2 battery life is great the Flex is excellent. Go LG!
maorosh said:
i like this battery
i used before Iphone 5,
after some hours phone was dead
this one stay and stay
almost 24H
i really like this phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, LG G2 battery is great, we all know that. It is also 3100mAh, so the comparison to the iPhone 5 (1440mAh) is apples to oranges seeing as it is more than twice as big.
There is really no point to this thread really.
LordLugard said:
Yes, LG G2 battery is great, we all know that. It is also 3100mAh, so the comparison to the iPhone 5 (1440mAh) is apples to oranges seeing as it is more than twice as big.
There is really no point to this thread really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's true but from the customer point of view, they don't care what inside, they don't care what tech of the battery pack is being used, they don't care it's 1mAh or 100000mAh. What people care is how long it would last, of course, it has to be packed in the slim, thin body.
I got 48 hours battery life with 8.5 hours screen time ? g2 is the best
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
LordLugard said:
Yes, LG G2 battery is great, we all know that. It is also 3100mAh, so the comparison to the iPhone 5 (1440mAh) is apples to oranges seeing as it is more than twice as big.
There is really no point to this thread really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The battery could be 10 times as big, but if one of them can last a full day and the other only half a day, that's what's important. G2 also has bigger screen and faster processor, so it needs a bigger battery..
But I agree, there is no point to this thread. It's the same as the other 1/2 dozen talking about how great the battery life is.
souleman said:
The battery could be 10 times as big, but if one of them can last a full day and the other only half a day, that's what's important. G2 also has bigger screen and faster processor, so it needs a bigger battery..
But I agree, there is no point to this thread. It's the same as the other 1/2 dozen talking about how great the battery life is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the A7 CPU (iPhone 5S) is faster than the Snapdragon 800. But that doesn't really matter, the screen is what uses most of the power.
Oh my god. That discussion once again. A dual core 1.3 GHz processor is not FASTER than a 2.3 GHz snapdragon 800. It's the optimisation between hardware and software that makes it appear faster - the SoC in itself is NOT faster.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
scy1192 said:
Actually the A7 CPU (iPhone 5S) is faster than the Snapdragon 800. But that doesn't really matter, the screen is what uses most of the power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true.
I hear the first 64bit Snapdragon will be the 410 (midrange), guessing Android will also be going that direction soon.
They haven't announced the 64 replacement for S800/805
vPro97 said:
Oh my god. That discussion once again. A dual core 1.3 GHz processor is not FASTER than a 2.3 GHz snapdragon 800. It's the optimisation between hardware and software that makes it appear faster - the SoC in itself is NOT faster.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isheep don't understand optimization. Its like what the playstation 3 managed with its crap nvidia card.. optimization is everything
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
i dont like flex, its a nice "gimik"
SPBoss said:
I got 48 hours battery life with 8.5 hours screen time ? g2 is the best
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not way ... i dont believe it i got only 4H+
maorosh said:
not way ... i dont believe it i got only 4H+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can have 8h, but you should use edge, 10% of brightness and witout games)
I have more then 5h with active using!
battery much good. much super. much large. much amaze!
I have been pleased with the LG G2
Related
we all know that the battery life is crap on the amaze. It's no surprise. What I've been wondering since is why? why is it such a battery hog. In terms of CPU and ram, it's only slightly higher than the sensation and the sensation has a great battery life. I know the sensation and Amaze are completely different phones and hardware is completely different, but what makes the amaze have such a bad battery life? anyone ever able to figure this out?
seansk said:
we all know that the battery life is crap on the amaze. It's no surprise. What I've been wondering since is why? why is it such a battery hog. In terms of CPU and ram, it's only slightly higher than the sensation and the sensation has a great battery life. I know the sensation and Amaze are completely different phones and hardware is completely different, but what makes the amaze have such a bad battery life? anyone ever able to figure this out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might be the kernel, extra horsepower, less optimizations than the sensation?
I always assumed it was the absolutely stunning screen that did it.
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
It's the display, it uses too much power and heats up too quickly, which uses more energy than it should, that's just imo though.
i used google maps tonight to get to my daughters swim meet. 2 hours and 29 minutes uptime and my battery literally went from 100% to 35%, no exaggeration. the only thing i was amazed by was how ****ty my battery life is. oh well, 2 more days and this phone goes in the drawer to collect dust
mrmako777 said:
i used google maps tonight to get to my daughters swim meet. 2 hours and 29 minutes uptime and my battery literally went from 100% to 35%, no exaggeration. the only thing i was amazed by was how ****ty my battery life is. oh well, 2 more days and this phone goes in the drawer to collect dust
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used navigation app the other week, left the house with 100% (right off the charger) got in the car, typed in destination. 15 minutes later, my battery was on 81%....this can't be normal
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
fuego77 said:
I used navigation app the other week, left the house with 100% (right off the charger) got in the car, typed in destination. 15 minutes later, my battery was on 81%....this can't be normal
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No that sounds about right
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
The display for sure since we're rockin' that qHD, now had it been a Super Amoled - it'll make a big difference in terms of power usage. I've set my display to the lowest (helps out battery drainage most of the time) and i've also downloaded JuiceDefender (works great).
glacierguy said:
No that sounds about right
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately so huh? I keep my brightness at 30% at all times too
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
with the emerging on aosp roms, we can tweak the voltage that certain parts of hardware get. you never know, this phone might have had a code problem like the gs3 where they accidentally set the voltage too high and the phones battery died like crazy
fuego77 said:
Unfortunately so huh? I keep my brightness at 30% at all times too
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I kept my brightness at 10 and used juice defender and the screen still won every time... 2-3 hours of screen time? Yuck... one s doubles that
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
Amaze has horrible battery life, I get decent battery life but thats because I use my ipad for gaming and vídeos and Internet. I use My amaze for social things and calls/text.... Oh and for hotspot
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2
glacierguy said:
Lol I kept my brightness at 10 and used juice defender and the screen still won every time... 2-3 hours of screen time? Yuck... one s doubles that
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the display on amaze better/different than one s? Sounds like one s has a much better battery life
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
glacierguy said:
Lol I kept my brightness at 10 and used juice defender and the screen still won every time... 2-3 hours of screen time? Yuck... one s doubles that
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the display on amaze better/different than one s? Sounds like one s has a much better battery life....
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
mrmako777 said:
i used google maps tonight to get to my daughters swim meet. 2 hours and 29 minutes uptime and my battery literally went from 100% to 35%, no exaggeration. the only thing i was amazed by was how ****ty my battery life is. oh well, 2 more days and this phone goes in the drawer to collect dust
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you can donate it to one of the developers so they can help improve the amaze for those of us who like it? Just a thought.
What? I said that?
shuvarts said:
Is the display on amaze better/different than one s? Sounds like one s has a much better battery life....
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally don't notice a difference...
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
jaytee20 said:
Maybe you can donate it to one of the developers so they can help improve the amaze for those of us who like it? Just a thought.
What? I said that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would b a great idea actually....help out the ppl here who love the phone
dirtyglacier said:
That would b a great idea actually....help out the ppl here who love the phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't
Pay 200-300 for a phone to have it for 6 months only to give it to a stranger?
Terrible idea of an investment. Especially since he wouldn't be able to get any benefit since he would no longer own the phone.
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
jaytee20 said:
Maybe you can donate it to one of the developers so they can help improve the amaze for those of us who like it? Just a thought.
What? I said that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Donate? Lulz.
Well I paid full retail for the phone when it came out, I'm a good hearted person, I wouldnt mind just giving it to a dev but then I would need a phone
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Hi, I'm from overseas and I really like the droid DNA but I'm skeptical about their battery life, I mean seriously , 1080p screen with 2000mah battery? Currently I'm using evolte while this is a great phone , 1 thing that bothers me is that this phone isn't gsm capable, I preffer to have a cdma+gsm on my phone so that I don't need to carry extra phones when I'm overseas, but like I said I'm skeptical about droid DNA battery, so anyone here ever try that? I want the battery life comparisons between the two.
Thx.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
10-Dee-Q said:
Hi, I'm from overseas and I really like the droid DNA but I'm skeptical about their battery life, I mean seriously , 1080p screen with 2000mah battery? Currently I'm using evolte while this is a great phone , 1 thing that bothers me is that this phone isn't gsm capable, I preffer to have a cdma+gsm on my phone so that I don't need to carry extra phones when I'm overseas, but like I said I'm skeptical about droid DNA battery, so anyone here ever try that? I want the battery life comparisons between the two.
Thx.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If battery life and gsm support is important to you, why not.just get motorolla droid razr maxx he? It is sim unlocked and os updates is extremely.quick now that google.has bought them.
1080p with quad core cpu on the DNA would.eat.the battery life like an appetizer.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
10-Dee-Q said:
Hi, I'm from overseas and I really like the droid DNA but I'm skeptical about their battery life, I mean seriously , 1080p screen with 2000mah battery? Currently I'm using evolte while this is a great phone , 1 thing that bothers me is that this phone isn't gsm capable, I preffer to have a cdma+gsm on my phone so that I don't need to carry extra phones when I'm overseas, but like I said I'm skeptical about droid DNA battery, so anyone here ever try that? I want the battery life comparisons between the two.
Thx.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not ask about all of this in the Droid DNA board?
10-Dee-Q said:
Hi, I'm from overseas and I really like the droid DNA but I'm skeptical about their battery life, I mean seriously , 1080p screen with 2000mah battery? Currently I'm using evolte while this is a great phone , 1 thing that bothers me is that this phone isn't gsm capable, I preffer to have a cdma+gsm on my phone so that I don't need to carry extra phones when I'm overseas, but like I said I'm skeptical about droid DNA battery, so anyone here ever try that? I want the battery life comparisons between the two.
Thx.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have both phones. Yesterday I had 17 hours on my DNA and about 18% left when I put it on the charger. I'm very happy with the battery life
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Yeah, but fern, what kind of screen on time is that, or was that mostly stand-by?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
scottspa74 said:
Yeah, but fern, what kind of screen on time is that, or was that mostly stand-by?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't show that but I'm on my phone a lot. It's pretty solid
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
everyone in the droid dna forums
i suggest you ask there lol
I activated one for a user on Monday.. I felt obligated to play with it for a bit, and didn't notice the battery discharging any faster then anything else.
and.. DAT SCREEN! I wouldn't mind a sprint variant at all.
regalpimpin said:
I activated one for a user on Monday.. I felt obligated to play with it for a bit, and didn't notice the battery discharging any faster then anything else.
and.. DAT SCREEN! I wouldn't mind a sprint variant at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint will announce something come Spring time and I bet will be even better then the DNA
fernando sor said:
I have both phones. Yesterday I had 17 hours on my DNA and about 18% left when I put it on the charger. I'm very happy with the battery life
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You think it's comparable to the Evo LTE? I would assume it's much worse, as the LTE has a larger battery and doesn't have that screen size or quality.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity(TF700T) using XDA Premium HD
What I want to know is batyerylife comparisons vs evolte, and I don't want any other brand, cause I only love "sense"
I currently have motorolla photon as spare phone, good phone, great reception, great battery life, I'm using extended battery, but it doesn't have sense and I feel that the UI is terrible.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
10-Dee-Q said:
What I want to know is batyerylife comparisons vs evolte, and I don't want any other brand, cause I only love "sense"
I currently have motorolla photon as spare phone, good phone, great reception, great battery life, I'm using extended battery, but it doesn't have sense and I feel that the UI is terrible.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They already answered your question...and the Evo has the damn there the same sized battery 2000mah vs 2020mah??...and if u love sense ...then either phone will do u well...yet like someone above me said ...the DNA will eat up battery more than the Evo...you might as well go for the DNA since it comes with JB ...sense 4.5 20 more mah and hey its newer!!! smh
leerage said:
Sprint will announce something come Spring time and I bet will be even better then the DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if it has the name "Evo" anywhere near it I ain't paying for it.
But then again I said that about the 3D and even this phone >.<
The s4pro chipset is more efficient then the s4 chipset. Just like how the s4 chipset is more efficient then the s3 chipset.
The OG evo uses more power and only one core(sloowww),the evo lte uses less power with more cores and a higher clock speed, I would assume the quad core chipset s4pro which is also 28-nm would have even better battery life because of the efficiency of multiple cores turning on only when needed.
However, the adreno 320 + a 440+ppi screen will take a toll on the battery, so playing HD games or using the camera would surely use a bit of power but not relative to the OG evo battery drain
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
slowfncar said:
The s4pro chipset is more efficient then the s4 chipset. Just like how the s4 chipset is more efficient then the s3 chipset.
The OG evo uses more power and only one core(sloowww),the evo lte uses less power with more cores and a higher clock speed, I would assume the quad core chipset s4pro which is also 28-nm would have even better battery life because of the efficiency of multiple cores turning on only when needed.
However, the adreno 320 + a 440+ppi screen will take a toll on the battery, so playing HD games or using the camera would surely use a bit of power but not relative to the OG evo battery drain
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PROOF?
S4 and S4 PRO uses the same krait cpu cores, both are fabricated at the same node(28 mm).
S4 pro is NOT more efficient but rather more powerful(2 cores vs 4 cores; adreno 225 vs adreno 320).
It should infact consume considerably more power especially if the apps you're running is multi threaded optimzed.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
raclimja said:
PROOF?
S4 and S4 PRO uses the same krait cpu cores, both are fabricated at the same node(28 mm).
S4 pro is NOT more efficient but rather more powerful(2 cores vs 4 cores; adreno 225 vs adreno 320).
It should infact consume considerably more power especially if the apps you're running is multi threaded optimzed.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whenever we talk about extra processing power or graphics resolution we have to flip the coin over and talk about the implications they have on battery life. One would think that, generally speaking, the more powerful the CPU/GPU, the more power it consumes. Too bad you’re wrong.
As processor technology advances a few interesting things happen. Circuit paths get smaller so power requirements drop. Less heat is produced so there’s less resistance which also contributes to a reduction in power demands.
As graphics processors get better they can take more load off the CPU which can not only make things look a whole lot nicer, it can also help reduce power consumption as well. It sounds crazy, I know.
I don’t think we’ll see batteries get any smaller (in capacity) any time soon, but looking at how much extra power is harnessed inside the the processors, the battery required to power them is a lot smaller than you might have imagined.
http://pocketnow.com/2012/10/26/snapdragon-s4-pro
Just a source,I am not looking for an argument as I did not create the s4pro,I have no say of how well it works as they intended.
My guess is that it has better battery life when using not so demanding apps ,gaming on the other hand probably uses more battery life but at a much better performance factor
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
slowfncar said:
Whenever we talk about extra processing power or graphics resolution we have to flip the coin over and talk about the implications they have on battery life. One would think that, generally speaking, the more powerful the CPU/GPU, the more power it consumes. Too bad you’re wrong.
As processor technology advances a few interesting things happen. Circuit paths get smaller so power requirements drop. Less heat is produced so there’s less resistance which also contributes to a reduction in power demands.
As graphics processors get better they can take more load off the CPU which can not only make things look a whole lot nicer, it can also help reduce power consumption as well. It sounds crazy, I know.
I don’t think we’ll see batteries get any smaller (in capacity) any time soon, but looking at how much extra power is harnessed inside the the processors, the battery required to power them is a lot smaller than you might have imagined.
http://pocketnow.com/2012/10/26/snapdragon-s4-pro
Just a source,I am not looking for an argument as I did not create the s4pro,I have no say of how well it works as they intended.
My guess is that it has better battery life when using not so demanding apps ,gaming on the other hand probably uses more battery life but at a much better performance factor
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about you stop posting misinformation.
You clearly do not understand what you're talking about as all you did was copy paste.
As a said, Qualcomm S4 and Qualcomm S4 pro both use the same cpu architecture while the latter has more cores.
Both are also using the same node(28nm), so the stuff you posted about smaller circuitry as a reason it is more efficient then S4 doesn't make sense.
well obviously one says pro and one doesnt .....obviously the pro one is better becuase it says pro.
LoL
Well let's try it this way,the droid DNA has better battery life then the EVO 4g LTE even though it has to render more pixels,power a bigger screen & 4 cores instead of 2.
I do not know if the s4pro/prime is more efficient then the s4. And if I am wrong then I'm wrong and completely sorry if I came off hard on anyone. But I do know the droid DNA has stupendous battery life for its battery size.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Supposedly the s-lcd3 is more power efficient. That's the only possible reason the phone could have comparable battery life.
Sent from my EVO
I noticed we don't have any threads about Eco Mode. I would like to hear other users feedback / experiences?
My experience:
I turned on Eco Mode earlier this morning and haven't notice any difference performance wise. Battery wise I have seen about a 10% difference to what I would be about now. (10 hours and down to 65%, whereas I probably would be down to ~55%). From what I understand Eco Mode shuts down 2 cores, essentially making it a dual-core. I ran two quadrants (Not that these matter) with Eco Mode off 7500, and with Eco Mode on 5500 (2000 difference). I also played some games and couldn't notice anything. Honestly, I wouldn't even be able to tell if it was on or off without doing a quadrant.
Based on my experience with Eco Mode I would recommend it be turned on. At the end of a charge cycle there is potential to save 20% battery life at no cost to performance (visually). As always YMMV.
For the most part I don't see much difference. I know the phone runs cooler most of the time and a tad bit more battery life. A little bit if screen lag sometimes with it on. Most of what you will ever do with this phone won't need 4 cores so it's a nice addition.
whiteguypl said:
For the most part I don't see much difference. I know the phone runs cooler most of the time and a tad bit more battery life. A little bit if screen lag sometimes with it on. Most of what you will ever do with this phone won't need 4 cores so it's a nice addition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Its very nice its there. Hopefully kernels/roms will incorporate it on aosp.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Joecascio2000 said:
Agreed. Its very nice its there. Hopefully kernels/roms will incorporate it on aosp.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is, they need the source code for that. Don't think LG has given up the source code for their kernel yet.
Joecascio2000 said:
Agreed. Its very nice its there. Hopefully kernels/roms will incorporate it on aosp.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope we see this as well. I read a review of the Nexus 4 a bit ago over at Ars Technica, at one point they compared the performance of it to our LGOG and found the Nexus 4 faster "out the gate" but would stutter after being under load for a while (think playing a somewhat graphically intensive game). The reviewer concluded the kernels used in the Nexus 4 allowed the processor to run full boar without much of a governor so it would start to approach the thermal barrier and subsequently hindering performance. The LGOG kernels, however, were more restricted and allowed for more substantiated performance, resulting in better battery life and a cooler phone.
See review here:
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/11/nexus-4-two-thirds-of-a-great-phone/
I remember reading that article, too. I don't think LG gets enough credit for their Android "skin" and the thought they put into this phone. It's not perfect, but they did a really good job in my opinion.
A
I really do believe that Google rushed android 4.2. They should have added some kind of power management to the Nexus 4...
that which the hardware people giveth...the software people taketh away.
or...
you may not need all four cores today, but before end of life i'll bet you're glad you have em. i remember folks saying "what on earth would you need 512K of RAM for?" and "Why did you get a 100GB Hard Drive, you'll never need all that space."
Will Eco Mode keep your phone in dual-core mode no matter what, or does it dynamically turn cores on/off based on what you're doing?
It's dynamic AFAIK.
whiteguypl said:
It's dynamic AFAIK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, there seems like there is no reason NOT to have this enabled.
Just plugged in. With eco mode I got 1 day 45 minutes, with 3 hours 35 minutes screen on time. Much better than what I normally get.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Joecascio2000 said:
Just plugged in. With eco mode I got 1 day 45 minutes, with 3 hours 35 minutes screen on time. Much better than what I normally get.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That still sucks IMO. There still need to be major optimizations to AndroidOS. No way it should be my biggest battery user every day.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Jank4AU said:
That still sucks IMO. There still need to be major optimizations to AndroidOS. No way it should be my biggest battery user every day.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me thinks there is no way to make you happy.
Sent from my LG-E970
Jank4AU said:
That still sucks IMO. There still need to be major optimizations to AndroidOS. No way it should be my biggest battery user every day.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The os is the biggest battery user only because the screen is using very little power by comparison, skewing percentages.
chrisphoenix7 said:
The os is the biggest battery user only because the screen is using very little power by comparison, skewing percentages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not deep sleeping the way it should...If you use 3.5 hours of screen time, that should be your highest consumer of battery power, by far.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 09:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 AM ----------
DraginMagik said:
Me thinks there is no way to make you happy.
Sent from my LG-E970
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps I doth protest too much? :angel:
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Jank4AU said:
It's not deep sleeping the way it should...If you use 3.5 hours of screen time, that should be your highest consumer of battery power, by far.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 09:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 AM ----------
Perhaps I doth protest too much? :angel:
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see where he showed the battery stats during that day of activity. So how do you know it's not the biggest source of power drain? Am I missing something here?
IrateCustomer said:
I don't see where he showed the battery stats during that day of activity. So how do you know it's not the biggest source of power drain? Am I missing something here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be guessing as many people have complained about AndroidOS being out of control. However, what I was referencing was my post just above that where I said AOS should never be "MY" biggest source of battery consumption. If I get 3.5 hours of screen-on time, the battery would necessarily use more power than anything else unless there is an issue. No matter when I measure the battery stats, android os is the biggest consumer of battery. Right now I have 5hrs 35mins of charger. 23% screen power consumption with 2hrs 5 mins on time. However, I've 41% android battery consumption with on time of 3hrs 43 mins. It's a ROM or kernel thing. Not blaming our devs, they're doing the best with what they have released to them. However, there is something wrong as we should all be getting better battery life than we are with this size battery.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
After having several android devices, I know that if screen on time is over 2.5 hours it should always be the highest battery usage. Also, Android OS should never be above 20%. If it is, there is a problem.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
If you look at battery posts from nexus 4 users. You will see their android os % at about 6 where ours is usually 40%. Its definitely a software issue.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Anyone have any experience with the battery life and the screen as far as scratches go?
I would love to know what the on screen battery life is like. My Xperia Z was good for abouot 4 hours of on screen time and around 15 hours.
Don't know what to said. Show you the visual.
Sent from my C6802 using xda premium
kkkok8051 said:
Don't know what to said. Show you the visual.
Sent from my C6802 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the screentime at?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
After switch on my device. Maybe.
Sent from my C6802 using xda premium
Normal working day. (Gmails/texting/calling/music/browsing)
build# ____.0.471 (latest)
I use GSAM Battery to show me the screen time used. Do you know how much screen time you have had on?
avetny said:
Normal working day. (Gmails/texting/calling/music/browsing)
build# ____.0.471 (latest)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks pretty awesome battery performance.
good info
vodeblog said:
Looks pretty awesome battery performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes bro., is not perfect but is much better than many flagship phones.
Stamina mode helping very good. The only thing I want to remove is bloatware, because sometimes phone asking me to update some things I don't wont to even see.
But again buttery is good. Better than my Galaxy s 4 (octa-core/hacked) better than my HTC one (stock) and better than my htc butterfly s (Stock) where buttery is 3200mah
Stay tuned.
Regards
avetny said:
Yes bro., is not perfect but is much better than many flagship phones.
Stamina mode helping very good. The only thing I want to remove is bloatware, because sometimes phone asking me to update some things I don't wont to even see.
But again buttery is good. Better than my Galaxy s 4 (octa-core/hacked) better than my HTC one (stock) and better than my htc butterfly s (Stock) where buttery is 3200mah
Stay tuned.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about some gsam battery screenshots..?
avetny said:
Normal working day. (Gmails/texting/calling/music/browsing)
build# ____.0.471 (latest)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Able to share more details based on this screen shot?
Out of the 10hrs + up time, how many hours of screen time is that? I thin that's the important stat. Also, what level of brightness are you on and are you on 3G all the time, did you turn on stamina mode?
Trying to compare with my S4 on 4.3 GE ROM.
I'm getting the ZU tonight :good:
So far for me, I am down to 24% after 10 hours. I won't make it through the day since I"m still up for 5 more hours. This was on moderate usage with Stamina Mode Enabled.
- one phone call
- three emails
- checked facebook twice, and instagram twice
- watched 20 minutes of youtube tho
- listened to music while working out for one hour
- 57 texts sent/received
avetny said:
Yes bro., is not perfect but is much better than many flagship phones.
Stamina mode helping very good. The only thing I want to remove is bloatware, because sometimes phone asking me to update some things I don't wont to even see.
But again buttery is good. Better than my Galaxy s 4 (octa-core/hacked) better than my HTC one (stock) and better than my htc butterfly s (Stock) where buttery is 3200mah
Stay tuned.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable the bloat? (Settings - Applications - Find app and hit "disable")
BTW, does the ZU have the anti shatter protection on the screen like the Z? If so, is the Sony logo on the protection or on the device itself?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
LordManhattan said:
Disable the bloat? (Settings - Applications - Find app and hit "disable")
BTW, does the ZU have the anti shatter protection on the screen like the Z? If so, is the Sony logo on the protection or on the device itself?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No that system is for kids...I need to remove them forever.
I think sony logo on screen protector again...(if you look closely on sun you can see)
avetny said:
No that system is for kids...I need to remove them forever.
I think sony logo on screen protector again...(if you look closely on sun you can see)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I agree, but it'll hide that **** from your drawer at least until root is achieved Not the best solution, but it's still something.
And poop. Really Sony? Again? That's a really weird thing to do. But... I don't really care.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
I have an iPhone 4s and I'm planning to change to Samsung Galaxy s3 or maybe a Note III (since there's a rumor that it'll be out). I use my phone 24/7 and I wanna know which phone's battery lasts longer? o::victory:
All depends on what you are doing with the phone. Heavy user or not.
The note III is supposed to be a battery beast.
The s3 is ok. I have seen people saying it lasts longer than the old iphone and also the opposite. So, I would say there is no big difference. I have bough the samsung 3000mAh battery and cannot complain
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Erik1805 said:
All depends on what you are doing with the phone. Heavy user or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heavy user
beatsdre said:
Heavy user
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My S3 LTE was just about the same or maybe slightly worse as Iphone 5. LTE was OFF
Go for the Note 3 if u can it is a beast in every way Performance and Battery !!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
techno-np said:
Go for the Note 3 if u can it is a beast in every way Performance and Battery !!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery on my S3 isn't great, it's better than my xperia U, but I'm still pretty disappointed. Got a Moto G for a friend though and that thing is a battery beast.
Really good.
beatsdre said:
I have an iPhone 4s and I'm planning to change to Samsung Galaxy s3 or maybe a Note III (since there's a rumor that it'll be out). I use my phone 24/7 and I wanna know which phone's battery lasts longer? o::victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S3 and Iphone 4s have exactly the same battery drain. Maybe S3 will last a little longer,max 30 min.
Btw,firstly,Note 3 is out,already for a while. Secondly,Note is highly recommended,as it can last 7 hours of screen-on time and performance is beast. It's ideally designed for heavy users.
You can buy an s3 an put the Liquid Smooth Rom On it works Very Very Smooth better then the original and also you can flash custom Kernel that Optimize your Battery life i do That too and my battery still keeping full after a long Schoolday (listening music, playing games and so on)
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
You can always buy a zerolemon battery and your phone will last couple of days with heavy use
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk