Related
Hi,
Just watched presentation of upcoming Toshiba Tab and Iahve to say I fell in love again (as with GT 10.1 which dissapointed me with itd SoC).
AT200 will be equipped with Ti OMAP4 4430 (1,2 Ghz) chip - the one with Netflix HD certificate. Has microSD slot, micro USB and HDMI. It is just 7,7 mm thick and very light.
What do you think....if you thinking of getting GT10.1 in few days would that make you wait?
And one more thing... Video transcoding - is it coming to an end???
I just bought my tab 4 days ago, don't want to even think about this tablet, I would've gotten it but too late now :/
Specs is one thing. What's important is real life performance and if there's any other possible flaw. Gtab actually looks not bad, but the software performance bogged it down. I'd by the time the Toshiba tablet is released, icecream sandwich may be released or close to be released. So unless the performance of the Toshiba tab is another class higher than grab, I see no point thinking too much about it.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Looks almost identical to the Gtab! same resolution display too.... Won't be long before Apple will be taking Toshiba to the courts over this!! (or maybe Samsung will!??)
Please use the Q&A Forum for questions Thanks
Moving to Q&A
Serious_Beans said:
I just bought my tab 4 days ago, don't want to even think about this tablet, I would've gotten it but too late now :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I looked at the Engadget review and the tablet looked pretty slow to me, I might be wrong. I'm very happy with my P7510 running on a vanilla 3.1 Honeycomb (soon to run on PhantomHacker's 3.2 vanilla ROM) and I'm looking forward to see Ice Cream on it.
The thing is, we will never purchase a tablet if we wait for the next "big one" to come out. Technology changes so fast that is not worth to trouble yourself. Just enjoy the tablet and use it to death, I personally think that my Tab 10.1 is an excellent product.
Well, I am not waiting for the next big one but just for one that does not have Tegra2 inside, looks OK, has I/O's I want and 3G connectivity.
So, just to have something for now I bought iPad 1 3G few weeks ago. As it is very limited device I was waiting for it to get right price. $350 for new one on warranty is OK. Now I can wait till end of the year to get Excite or Holiday or TF2 or Xoom2.... Will see.
If you want to wait, an alternative would be the HP Touchpad for $99 (fire sale instead of $499). It runs on WebOS which is awesome and I'm pretty sure someone will make an Android ROM for it eventually. Don't expect a great quality build, though.
The Tosh looks very nice, another weapon in the Android armoury. I'm still very happy with my Samsung 16Gb Wifi.
yqed said:
If you want to wait, an alternative would be the HP Touchpad for $99 (fire sale instead of $499). It runs on WebOS which is awesome and I'm pretty sure someone will make an Android ROM for it eventually. Don't expect a great quality build, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be all true if folks like me could actually get it.
IMHO if you want (especially 3G) tablet now, good one, for reasonable price, just to keep you going till the one you really want is out iPad1 seems like a great deal.
Does most of the stuff Tegra 2 tablets do, has 3G and new one can still be found pretty cheap (half of the zoom price for example). And form me video capabilities all almost the same.
There will be always something new and better than what's available currently in the market. By the time Toshiba excite gets released to the market, even more better tablet with awesome specs will be shown at a new tech show taking place anywhere on this planet Earth.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
galtom said:
Hi,
Just watched presentation of upcoming Toshiba Tab and Iahve to say I fell in love again (as with GT 10.1 which dissapointed me with itd SoC).
AT200 will be equipped with Ti OMAP4 4430 (1,2 Ghz) chip - the one with Netflix HD certificate. Has microSD slot, micro USB and HDMI. It is just 7,7 mm thick and very light.
What do you think....if you thinking of getting GT10.1 in few days would that make you wait?
And one more thing... Video transcoding - is it coming to an end???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm feeling exactly the same as you. The size and weight of the GT 10.1 was perfect but the poor video decoding performance of the Tegra 2 and lack of MicroSD card slot was a real let down. The AT200 seems like it will be perfect for me (assuming the OMAP proc is a lot better for video decoding). I just hope it comes out real soon to the UK market. If they delay it too long then I may be put off with official specs of ICS tablets.
It is the same SOC as in new Archos G9 series (like them but they look "cheap") and they say it will "Play" anything and everything. ;-)
Dont even think about getting the tab 10.
The Ti OMAP4 4430 in the toshiba is far superior to Tegra 2.
Ti OMAP4 4430 has A9 cores with Neon processing. Tergra 2 does not have the Neon processing and will be much slower when running apps which use Neon code and alot of apps are starting to use it.
Ti OMAP4 4430 has DUAL channel memory controller. Tegra 2 only has a single channel. Since video memory is shared, dual channel will give double the memory bandwidth which is highly needed since video memory is shared from system memory.
Ti OMAP4 4430 has SUPERIOR video decoding hardware compared to tegra 2. You can finally play real HD 1080p video. Tegra 2 decoder is so slow it cant decode main and high HD profiles which is what everyone uses.
For the newcomers to this forum, don't put much stock in anything ^ this person says. He's a known troll who will say one thing in one thread and then turn around and say the exact opposite in another.
On topic, the Excite looks like a nice machine. Do we have a US release date for it yet?
ouch! Guessing no one has the actually specs on this tab yet, looks decent size wise.
mankoorb said:
ouch! Guessing no one has the actually specs on this tab yet, looks decent size wise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Full specs have been released.
Does it have an amazing screen like the Samsung SPLS? Screen quality along with weight is what made my decision. However im disappointed in the current state of honeycomb/tablet apps. I would expect apps like Google+ to have the hangout video support. Lack of skype video is also a huge downer. My older samsung galaxy 7 also had way better video playing support.
MMcCraryNJ said:
For the newcomers to this forum, don't put much stock in anything ^ this person says. He's a known troll who will say one thing in one thread and then turn around and say the exact opposite in another.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a false statement. Never ever have I contradicted myself. Never.
MMcCraryNJ said:
On topic, the Excite looks like a nice machine. Do we have a US release date for it yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but don't worry, I do not think Europe has one either .
And two facts:
1. OMAP is a definitely better SOC than Tegra 2 - no arguing here. The only thing at which Tegra 2 might be better (we will have to wait and see, but I doubt it myself) is energy management.
I am worried about battery life of a tablet with 1,2 - 1,5 Ghz clock.
2. It will be cheaper in US than in EU - fact.
Now, one more "issue" we might encounter by the time it is in the shops. What will be a better choice - tablet with Omap4 or Tegra3/Kal-El with 4 cores and new architecture? (unless nvidia made an intel trick or the one they do with graphic cards - Tegra 3 is two Tegra 2 cpu's on a single chip - this would suck I think)
My sister really wants a pocketable music player/camera/ of some kind. Mom won't get her a phone and is therefore considering an iPod touch, even though my sister shares my hatred of apple products. All said, an android PMP would be perfect for her.
No, an old phone without cellular access would not be ok, my mom... its easier not to try to explain, she just isn't ok with that. =P
So, I went to look up the Samsung Galaxy Players (as the only android PMPs i know are Samsung and Archos, and the Archos ones look disappointing) and i found there were no complete/reliable spec sheets anywhere on the internet >_< information was either vague (EG unspecified 1 GHz processor) or conflicting.
I'm looking between the Galaxy players 4.0, 4,2, and 5.0.
Which is better? screen size and internal storage do not matter as much as screen resolution, RAM, CPU, and SD card. I'm looking to get the best one i can buy at this point, not the best bang-for-your-buck one.
also, i found this device on GSMArena:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_player_70_plus-4633.php
Anyone know anything about it?
As i said, there's not much on the internet about the galaxy players. Any help from you guys would be appreciated
NOTE: yes, i consider a 5" screen pocketable. So does my sister. A 7" tablet (EG nexus 7), however, is not, so that's not an option.
They all suffer from lack of RAM at this point. Maybe you should wait for a new model to be released...if they ever release one. Personally I like the 5.0 because of its screen size, and that's about it. As a PMP they all work fine. In terms of processing power the 4 and 5 are the same, not sure about the 4.2. both the 4 and 5 are SD Card expandable, again not sure about the 4.2. Lastly, that device you linked to looks very promising. Kinda like a Galaxy Player 5.0 2! I hadn't even heard of it until you. To sum it all up, They all work well as PMP's, and they all perform pretty similarly. That 70+ looks way better than any of the previous models, so if you could get your hands on that, go for it.
-arceusg
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1720457 All specs are here. However I say the 4.0 is the best because it's more the all rounder PMP player, but the 5.0 has more custom roms. All the spec sheets for all galaxy player are found on Samsung's site. You click tech specs, and then hit the PDF file above.
Do you only want "Android only" players, because there are some other good ones too. The Sony Walkman Z is also android only and is dual core. You can try looking at the Cowon J3, or D3. But I would wait because Samsung is probably going to release a new Galaxy Player. That Device you linked is the Galaxy Player 70 Plus. It is Samsungs first dual core player, but it was only released in Korea. It is based of the Galaxy S2, similar to how the Galaxy player 4.0 is similar to the GS1.
It would be best to wait for the upcoming YP-GP1 with ICS,dual core and qHD.
The new model that's supposed to be released is similar to a Galaxy S3, however, it will be a whopping 5.8 inches, like, mini tablet sized.
I'd say go with the 4.2, it looks better, and quality is better as well, and as long as she's not going to be a heavy gamer of some sorts, she'll be fine with it.
Otherwise, if you plan to put a custom rom, I would say 5.0, although I dont have one myself (I have a 4.0) , since it has more ROMS to choose some, even though 4.0 looks promising.
There's also the Walkman Z, which is Sony's android PMP, and it looks alright, 1 GB of RAM, great if she's going to be a heavy user, although I don't own one of these either, so I have no real experience with it.
Anyways, maybe you should show her some of the choices, and let her pick from them herself.
zaclimon said:
It would be best to wait for the upcoming YP-GP1 with ICS,dual core and qHD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*googles* oh yeah, i remember reading about that when it was first leaked. Looks perfect. Think it'll be out in time for Christmas?
euphoriaflow said:
The new model that's supposed to be released is similar to a Galaxy S3, however, it will be a whopping 5.8 inches, like, mini tablet sized.
I'd say go with the 4.2, it looks better, and quality is better as well, and as long as she's not going to be a heavy gamer of some sorts, she'll be fine with it.
Otherwise, if you plan to put a custom rom, I would say 5.0, although I dont have one myself (I have a 4.0) , since it has more ROMS to choose some, even though 4.0 looks promising.
There's also the Walkman Z, which is Sony's android PMP, and it looks alright, 1 GB of RAM, great if she's going to be a heavy user, although I don't own one of these either, so I have no real experience with it.
Anyways, maybe you should show her some of the choices, and let her pick from them herself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5.8 sounds sweet, actually
she mainly wants it for music, web browsing, and games (mainly angry birds, minecraft PE, and fruit ninja), and i plan to throw GrooveIP on there eventually
ROMs aren't that important, but i do plan to help her root eventually.
Didn't know any of the walkmans were android powered, i'll have to check that out
and i do plan to let her make the final decision, if they're close. however, i want to give her the best options, not every option. I'm sure you understand.
mtmerrick said:
*googles* oh yeah, i remember reading about that when it was first leaked. Looks perfect. Think it'll be out in time for Christmas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only IFA will tell us more about this. I don't think that if they announce it, it would be released in the US.
zaclimon said:
Only IFA will tell us more about this. I don't think that if they announce it, it would be released in the US.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh, all the good stuff has to be imported anyways
5.0 if you cant wait and if you can that new 5.8...i have 5.0 and i love it..i have also android phone with 4.0 inch screen and 2 tablets with 7 and 10.1 and of all them i use SGS 5.0 most of the time and it was cheapest of all device i have.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 05:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 AM ----------
mtmerrick said:
Eh, all the good stuff has to be imported anyways
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe US will ban all samsung products and everything that is not apple
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
DAC
It is also worth pointing out that the 4.0 (and 4.2 I think) has better sound quality because it has the wolfson DAC (5.0 has yamaha which is not bad but not as good either). You can enable voodoo sound on 4.0
4.0 also has better screen dpi because the resolution is more fitting on the screen size. 5.0 is better for movies IMO but be prepared to see some pixels :cyclops:
kesongpinoy said:
It is also worth pointing out that the 4.0 (and 4.2 I think) has better sound quality because it has the wolfson DAC (5.0 has yamaha which is not bad but not as good either). You can enable voodoo sound on 4.0
4.0 also has better screen dpi because the resolution is more fitting on the screen size. 5.0 is better for movies IMO but be prepared to see some pixels :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now the Walkman Z is looking like the best overall device, even with its lack of removable storage. Only things that irks me about it is the charging cable and the lack of cameras. I like the Walkman because the SoC (Tegra 2 + 1GB RAM) is the same as my tablet, so I now its going to be powerful enough. What CPU/RAM do the 4.0, 4.2, and 5.0 have?
kesongpinoy said:
It is also worth pointing out that the 4.0 (and 4.2 I think) has better sound quality because it has the wolfson DAC (5.0 has yamaha which is not bad but not as good either). You can enable voodoo sound on 4.0
4.0 also has better screen dpi because the resolution is more fitting on the screen size. 5.0 is better for movies IMO but be prepared to see some pixels :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont see any pixel on mine and if i try.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Ultimately, there's no best or worst, it's about what's best for you. For this reason i have both the SGS 3.6 and 5.0. I like the 3.6 for its small size and extreme pocketability. I also use it as a bluetooth handsfree with my 7" 3G tablet. I love my 5.0 for the size of it's screen. It's still pocketable and i take it with me to outings and on weekends. It's very good for comfortably surfing the net on that large 5" screen or watching an odd movie.
baladev said:
Ultimately, there's no best or worst, it's about what's best for you. For this reason i have both the SGS 3.6 and 5.0. I like the 3.6 for its small size and extreme pocketability. I also use it as a bluetooth handsfree with my 7" 3G tablet. I love my 5.0 for the size of it's screen. It's still pocketable and i take it with me to outings and on weekends. It's very good for comfortably surfing the net on that large 5" screen or watching an odd movie.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, when i said best, i meant specs/performance-wise...
mtmerrick said:
well, when i said best, i meant specs/performance-wise...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even this is relative, it depends on what you need it for. If you want to play some very heavy 3d games, you need more power, but you will sacrifise the battery life.
If you read backa few comments I explain what it'd be used for...
mtmerrick said:
If you read backa few comments I explain what it'd be used for...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine 5.0 works on 1.2 ghz it had power vr chip 540 ..all games that i have like gta 3 ,max payne ,fifa 12 ,real racing 2 etc works smoothly if that was your anwser.Power Vr 540 chip on 800x480 resolution gives higher FPS then tegra 3 on tablet resolution so 3d want be a problem ..for future games only problem could be single core processor.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
I think it's the 4.0 or the 5.0 because they already have ROMs
Well, I own a Samsung Galaxy Player 4 and 4.2. For My the best between both devices is 4.2. The quality of sound and fluency is better. The only problem is sometimes when I use skype the 4.2 restart the system. :banghead:
Sent from my YP-GI1
I love my 4.0. It's smaller and fits well in a pocket. But girls have purses so I guess she wouldn't mind something bigger. I'd suggest you to wait for the new 5.8, it will be blazing fast with its dual core.
I will be moving to the new Archos line as soon as it is released so I need your guys help on which one to move to. The reason I ask is because I know that the 80 XS will have a rockchip processor while the 101XS will have a TI OMAP 4470. Which will be better in terms of development as well. I would really your opinions. Thanks
They both are very low end. Not very good for development considering not a lot of development for it. You should consider the nexus 7 or nexus 10 instead.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
Yea I know Nexus is better 100% of the time for development. No argument there. But I don't really like the fact that non of those had sd card slots. I really like Archos new design. Idk, I like having something different and Archos is just that. When I say development I mean that which will get more. I know that compared to other devices there is extremely little going on here. I guess it might all come down to which one Surdu supports lol. Anyone has any suggestions?
baari21 said:
Yea I know Nexus is better 100% of the time for development. No argument there. But I don't really like the fact that non of those had sd card slots. I really like Archos new design. Idk, I like having something different and Archos is just that. When I say development I mean that which will get more. I know that compared to other devices there is extremely little going on here. I guess it might all come down to which one Surdu supports lol. Anyone has any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the 80g9. The form factor is the same as the 8xs. I love the size of it. Typing on screen is easy and its just the right size for most every task. I find the larger tablets cumbersome to hold for longer periods.
I'm anxiously waiting for the 8xs here in n/a.
Sent from my ARCHOS 80G9 using xda app-developers app
Yea. The 80g9 was the perfect midpoint. I still want to know which would perform better though. TI OMAP4470 or rk3066
What are you doing with your tablet? From the videos I have seen, the new archos performs smooth and fast. The 8" I have not seen in action yet. But having my 80g9 for awhile now and running serdu's clean and fast rom, the only issue now is the amount of ram in my tablet. 512mb fills up quickly and a reboot is needed every so often to keep the tablet fast. You know when you have your ram filled as the tablet is slow to react.
A non issue with the tablets with 1 gb of ram.
Sent from my ARCHOS 80G9 using xda app-developers app
oh okay good. I also have 512mb Ram and it's killing me lol. My only other issue now is the keyboard size in the cover board. An 8 inch keyboard might be too small. Did you check that out by chance? Surdu's Clean and Fast is the best, It's what I'm running now.
baari21 said:
oh okay good. I also have 512mb Ram and it's killing me lol. My only other issue now is the keyboard size in the cover board. An 8 inch keyboard might be too small. Did you check that out by chance? Surdu's Clean and Fast is the best, It's what I'm running now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not seen either gen 10 device.
Sent from my SGH-I717D using xda app-developers app
It usually just comes down to what you are looking for. a bigger screen in the 101(10.1 inch) or more portability in the 80(8 inch) all preferences
jpacleb85 said:
It usually just comes down to what you are looking for. a bigger screen in the 101(10.1 inch) or more portability in the 80(8 inch) all preferences
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I consider both portable. I'm used to lugging around a 17" Acer notebook. I find the 8" form factor much nicer to use from an ergo standpoint. Easy to type in portrait and still a big enough screen to do other things.
Sent from my ARCHOS 80G9 using xda app-developers app
I bought the 80 g9 because of the form factor as well. I'm not too sure about the 8 inch this time around though. That is because of the bezel size, it is way too big.
For those of you who didn't see it yet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hWuXa7BTIUM
What do you guys think?
baari21 said:
I bought the 80 g9 because of the form factor as well. I'm not too sure about the 8 inch this time around though. That is because of the bezel size, it is way too big.
For those of you who didn't see it yet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hWuXa7BTIUM
What do you guys think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its still small enough to reach the entire screen with your two thumbs. That's all that matters.
As you can see its more portable than the 10xs too
Sent from my ARCHOS 80G9 using xda app-developers app
Archos 80XS use Rockchip 3066 from China! => 101XS better ( use TI OMAP 4470 )
I don't see the difference if it originates from China. Other than cheaper production costs. Not sure if TI makes there chips from USA though. I just honestly don't see your point on how that makes the 101XS better because of that. If you care to explain how that would be great. Thanks for the response though, I appreciate it.
Stereotype
baari21 said:
I don't see the difference if it originates from China. Other than cheaper production costs. Not sure if TI makes there chips from USA though. I just honestly don't see your point on how that makes the 101XS better because of that. If you care to explain how that would be great. Thanks for the response though, I appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect that he was referring to the fact that there is a stereotype (not entirely undeserved it must be said) that RockChip processors are of a lower quality and performace level than their TI, Qualcomm, etc. alternatives.
As of now there is less of a quality and performace gap (so far as I am aware) between RockChip CPUs and the CPUs of other manufacturers. I doubt very much if you would notice any performance issues if you went the 80xs over the 101xs, but (as you can tell if you've looked at the dev section for these devices) there is slightly more developer activity for the 101xs, so that may say something about the processor.
Could I enquire which of the two devices you chose in the end? (Assuming you chose either of them, of course.)
I am thinking about getting one of these. I know they are older tablets but how is the performance on these?
I got this tablet as a gift from my parents. They bought me a P7500 accidentally 'cause they though it was a 2012 version of tab 10.1, at first I sort of regretted to have this Tab but after I rooted and flashed a custom ROM it gave my Tab an "up to date" like UI. :good: I'm more than satisfied with the performance too!
jhcomputerguy said:
I am thinking about getting one of these. I know they are older tablets but how is the performance on these?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on the price, condition and your usage scenarios.
The Nook HD+ (9" screen) can be bought new for $150. It has a 1920x1280 resolution (translates to Retina display), dual-core CPU & 1GB ram (very similar to this tab). Easy to root and has KK ROM available.
The only downside is, no cameras, but on the plus side it comes with a microSD slot.
I currently have both in my possession - own the Nook HD+ and am rooting the Galaxy Tab for a relative. With price being the same, I would recommend the Nook HD+ for the superior screen.
hirent said:
Depends on the price, condition and your usage scenarios.
The Nook HD+ (9" screen) can be bought new for $150. It has a 1920x1280 resolution (translates to Retina display), dual-core CPU & 1GB ram (very similar to this tab). Easy to root and has KK ROM available.
The only downside is, no cameras, but on the plus side it comes with a microSD slot.
I currently have both in my possession - own the Nook HD+ and am rooting the Galaxy Tab for a relative. With price being the same, I would recommend the Nook HD+ for the superior screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And don't forget, our tab has probably been forgotten by Samsung.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
eushaun99 said:
And don't forget, our tab has probably been forgotten by Samsung.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*definitely
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
jhcomputerguy said:
I am thinking about getting one of these. I know they are older tablets but how is the performance on these?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I were you, I'd get it. I got the 3G Variant from my parents then I bought a Wi-Fi variant 2 years later then I bought another 3G variant days after I bought the Wi-Fi variant and I do not regret buying them because of the support we have been getting from the developers.
hirent said:
Depends on the price, condition and your usage scenarios.
The Nook HD+ (9" screen) can be bought new for $150. It has a 1920x1280 resolution (translates to Retina display), dual-core CPU & 1GB ram (very similar to this tab). Easy to root and has KK ROM available.
The only downside is, no cameras, but on the plus side it comes with a microSD slot.
I currently have both in my possession - own the Nook HD+ and am rooting the Galaxy Tab for a relative. With price being the same, I would recommend the Nook HD+ for the superior screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have an Office Max nearby and they have one in stock, you can score a Nook HD+ for $104. + tax with current 20% off coupon. It's a great tablet with wonderful display and can be rooted if you'd like.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
QUestions
AJtheAndroidNoOb said:
I got this tablet as a gift from my parents. They bought me a P7500 accidentally 'cause they though it was a 2012 version of tab 10.1, at first I sort of regretted to have this Tab but after I rooted and flashed a custom ROM it gave my Tab an "up to date" like UI. :good: I'm more than satisfied with the performance too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello seems that you have some knowledge on the matter. can you give me a hint?
I have been using one P7500 and I like it. It is the only one i ever tested so.. xD
i tryed to install XBMC you know the app? had some troubles untill i found i needed a special version which i have already installed.
XBMC is running but to see videos it runs another app called MX player. i installed mx player.
but from what i understoon in another thread in here ( showthread.php?t=2156254 ) they said i needed a special codec. i've downloaded the armv7 tegra2 but mxplayer keeps playing videos without sound.. i changed the definitions but still no sound.
Do you ever experienced anything like this? may i be forgotting something?
Do you recommend to root and change my android version? i think it is by default, dont think my father updated it.
jhcomputerguy said:
I am thinking about getting one of these. I know they are older tablets but how is the performance on these?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got mine from ebay for next to nothing and while it doesn't have an Otterbox or SD Card slot I find that the Verizon signal is great with it everywhere and the MTP Transfer on it is Faster than my S3.
sanuANCIENT said:
Hello seems that you have some knowledge on the matter. can you give me a hint?
I have been using one P7500 and I like it. It is the only one i ever tested so.. xD
i tryed to install XBMC you know the app? had some troubles untill i found i needed a special version which i have already installed.
XBMC is running but to see videos it runs another app called MX player. i installed mx player.
but from what i understoon in another thread in here ( showthread.php?t=2156254 ) they said i needed a special codec. i've downloaded the armv7 tegra2 but mxplayer keeps playing videos without sound.. i changed the definitions but still no sound.
Do you ever experienced anything like this? may i be forgotting something?
Do you recommend to root and change my android version? i think it is by default, dont think my father updated it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea about XBMC so I don't know if it has problems. What OS are u runnin'? I do recommend to root then flash/change the OS tho maybe it will fix that issue I'm not 100% sure but it will make your tab go smoothly and a JB 4.3 look if you flash the ROM I am running :good:
What chipset is the new Chromecast using?
EDIT:
It looks like it's using the new CPU from marvell. The original Chromecast uses an ARM Cortex-A9 single core and Chromecast 2 uses ARM Cortex-A7 processor dual core with support for 1080p HD.
http://www.marvell.com/company/news/pressDetail.do?releaseID=7116
Have a little bit of patience here, first batches have been just shipped today. My 2 just came in. Gotta get to a dump for more information on it
Oh yes, I hope we get more information regarding this soon Been scouring the interwebs for detailed specifications.
Specifically whether or not the CC2 uses a newer SoC with built in AC or still uses the same Armada 1500-Mini with a tacked on AC solution.
It's still has Marvell inside as Marvell has tweeted about the Chromecast 2 being released.
The other Marvell SoC that could be used is the Armada 1500 Plus.
http://www.marvell.com/company/news/pressDetail.do?releaseID=4716
http://www.marvell.com/multimedia-s...ts/Marvell-ARMADA-1500-Plus-Product-Brief.pdf
But I think this thing would be a "tad" too powerful and expensive for Google to use for a 35$ thingydoodler.
I could be wrong though.
As the original Chromecast used the 88DE3005, a cut down single core version of the 88DE3100 (which was inside Google TV (E: the 2nd gen)).
It looks like it has the new CPU from Marvel which is a dual core and is 2.5x faster than the original CPU found in Chromecast 1.
http://www.marvell.com/company/news/pressDetail.do?releaseID=7116
Strange, I would have expected Google would mention this big difference in the marketing of the CC2.
Okay then, a 1500 Mini Plus. And it has the Qdeo video processing capabilities. Interesting!
Lizard said:
Strange, I would have expected Google would mention this big difference in the marketing of the CC2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my thought. Why didn't they mention that it has dual cores.
By the way, Capt. The original Chromecast's SoC (88DE3005 which was a cutdown 88DE3100) used Marvell's PJ4B custom core, not an off-the-shelf Cortex-A9. It was compatible with Cortex-A9 though.
Lizard said:
Strange, I would have expected Google would mention this big difference in the marketing of the CC2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Capt said:
Exactly my thought. Why didn't they mention that it has dual cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a lot of people care. And it's not that big of a deal for this kind of device.
And the primary aspect of Chromecast at least to me is video. And that's pretty much off-loaded somewhere else.. Audio doesn't require much either..
I'll make a wild guess that the 1500 Mini Plus still uses the same Vivante GC1000 as the 1500 Mini used.
Hey Folks can anyone confirm my Feeling, that there is no 24p Stuttering anymore and the Picture Quality is sharper (especially at Netflix and HBO NOW)? My Movies and Shows are very smooth, sharp and without any stuttering.
https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Chromecast+2015+Teardown/50189
Here's your teardown with almost all specs you wish to know about.
Also double post hehe: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=63179884&postcount=4
michael08071984 said:
Hey Folks can anyone confirm my Feeling, that there is no 24p Stuttering anymore and the Picture Quality is sharper (especially at Netflix and HBO NOW)? My Movies and Shows are very smooth, sharp and without any stuttering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very sharp, it's really impressive the work that the new Chromecast make with Netflix, and in my country the internet service is not that good and the image quality its great!
Enviado desde mi Nexus 6 mediante Tapatalk
The only let down with the new CC2 is still no support for x265 hevc format...
If the cpu was that fast, they could easily have provided native support for x265