[Q] Need a fully functional ROM that requires no modification - Motorola Droid RAZR

Hey guys,
I'm running CM11 on my Verizon XT912 right now and there are a few issues. First of all, there's this big problem with the APNs that I'm seeing a lot of people having problems with, and I'm one of them. I can't send or receive MMS. Also, the WiFi reception is exceptionally weak.
This is the third rom I've tried in the past few days. First tried AOKP, then CM10, then CM11 - all of them were very cool, but gave me critical issues.
I need advice as to which rom I can install that isn't experimental, but fully functional. I don't require much, I don't have to be running the latest and greatest. It doesn't have to be a KitKat rom, it doesn't even have to be a JB rom, it can even be an ICS rom. These are my only two needs:
A. Everything works correctly without needing corrections / adjustments / editing config files, etc.
B. The rom needs to support the theme engine and accept CM type themes.
Thanks everyone

Raven-6 said:
Hey guys,
I'm running CM11 on my Verizon XT912 right now and there are a few issues. First of all, there's this big problem with the APNs that I'm seeing a lot of people having problems with, and I'm one of them. I can't send or receive MMS. Also, the WiFi reception is exceptionally weak.
This is the third rom I've tried in the past few days. First tried AOKP, then CM10, then CM11 - all of them were very cool, but gave me critical issues.
I need advice as to which rom I can install that isn't experimental, but fully functional. I don't require much, I don't have to be running the latest and greatest. It doesn't have to be a KitKat rom, it doesn't even have to be a JB rom, it can even be an ICS rom. These are my only two needs:
A. Everything works correctly without needing corrections / adjustments / editing config files, etc.
B. The rom needs to support the theme engine and accept CM type themes.
Thanks everyone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try LiquidSmooth...
03/11 build is the best in terms of the battery life and fully functional,only doesn't have the latest theme engine.
Sent from my Razr XT910

welder73 said:
Try LiquidSmooth...
03/11 build is the best in terms of the battery life and fully functional,only doesn't have the latest theme engine.
Sent from my Razr XT910
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may give that a shot. For now, I've just installed Paranoid Android 4.4 and it seems to work fine. Thanks everyone

Raven-6 said:
I may give that a shot. For now, I've just installed Paranoid Android 4.4 and it seems to work fine. Thanks everyone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, can you use the bluetooth oon Paranaid? Mine doesn't work. Thanks

stock based MIUI

Related

[Q] Custom ROMS vs Stock

Do all Custom ROMS for all the positive features they may bring always result in less stabililty than a Stock ROM?
I imagine CM7 to be the best....seeing as he works for Samsung also. I certainly found it the best when I had the I9000/Galaxy. However looking at the CyanogenMod forum there are plenty of people raising issues with the builds (including 'stable' builds).
I really enjoy trying different ROMS usually but I am deliberately sticking with a rooted stock at the moment - and it has never froze, crashed or rebooted itself yet! I do miss fiddling with my phone though!
Thoughts/opinions appreciated.
Thanks
criskelo 31 + latest siayh - no problemo )))
Yes.
(10 char)
If you want a stable rom, then use the one in my sig. Oxygen is amongst the most stable roms that are out here. It's almost bugfree, because the creater of the rom, Adam G is a perfectionist.
You have no touchwhizz, just stock android that works. If you are looking for a shiny rom, then this one is not for you. If you want a stable rom and an almost bug free rom, then this one is for you.
ps you won't find this rom on xda, because he does not want that anymore.
Samsung Galaxy SII
try this combination...
*CheckROM Revolution HD v3.1.1 (fast and lite)
*Speedmod-kernel-s2-k2-18-test8-CWM.zip (best battery life)
Phil_UK said:
Do all Custom ROMS for all the positive features they may bring always result in less stabililty than a Stock ROM?
I imagine CM7 to be the best....seeing as he works for Samsung also. I certainly found it the best when I had the I9000/Galaxy. However looking at the CyanogenMod forum there are plenty of people raising issues with the builds (including 'stable' builds).
I really enjoy trying different ROMS usually but I am deliberately sticking with a rooted stock at the moment - and it has never froze, crashed or rebooted itself yet! I do miss fiddling with my phone though!
Thoughts/opinions appreciated.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7 works fine for me..The nightlies are more stable and bug free than the stable version(RC1).
Thanks guys. Will no doubt start flashing soon, but have downloaded current Stock so I can switch backwhen i want also
lorkanoel said:
Samsung Galaxy SII
try this combination...
*CheckROM Revolution HD v3.1.1 (fast and lite)
*Speedmod-kernel-s2-k2-18-test8-CWM.zip (best battery life)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will this Kernel work fine with CM7??? I mean will the battery life still be the best or at least better?
b2rdetor said:
criskelo 31 + latest siayh - no problemo )))
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
Lennyz1988 said:
If you want a stable rom, then use the one in my sig. Oxygen is amongst the most stable roms that are out here. It's almost bugfree, because the creater of the rom, Adam G is a perfectionist.
You have no touchwhizz, just stock android that works. If you are looking for a shiny rom, then this one is not for you. If you want a stable rom and an almost bug free rom, then this one is for you.
ps you won't find this rom on xda, because he does not want that anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that rom based on CM?
FirstNoobToBrickHisPhone said:
Is that rom based on CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you can say that. It has some coding from CM, drivers etc. But it is supposed to be a stock android rom, the way google intended it, with (almost) no CM stuff.

Can someone help me selecting a ROM?

Here is what i need for it :
- Stability (Ideally tends to 100%).
- Fast and responsive.
I don't need any extra features.
Please help
u can try optimax.. you will like it..
fuser1337 said:
Here is what i need for it :
- Stability (Ideally tends to 100%).
- Fast and responsive.
I don't need any extra features.
Please help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want jb rom try > P.A.C All in one rom - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1803076 (stable and best jb rom)
if you like multitasking and stablilty use > Jelly Sandwich - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1928953 (stable js)
best roms i've used
fuser1337 said:
Here is what i need for it :
- Stability (Ideally tends to 100%).
- Fast and responsive.
I don't need any extra features.
Please help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, try OptiMax2 with sirkays kernel (im on vdsirotkin kernel, battery is more important to me)
Very fast (4300 antutu benchmark 1.4 ghz overclocked), very stable and stylish.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942116
fuser1337 said:
Here is what i need for it :
- Stability (Ideally tends to 100%).
- Fast and responsive.
I don't need any extra features.
Please help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need mine working 100% these days as I use it for work - I just went for stock .587, rooted and ripped all the bloatware out, and it's ready to go 100% stable. Not exactly adventurous... but it works really nicely.
Sure, latest stock is well polished and stable.
But Sony doesnt have reason to give us maximum in midrange phones (in their firmwares).
Developers have reasons to do that.
Thats why we have plenty of roms better than stock.
OptiMax is a good ICS rom. Its a fight between that and Jellysandwich
Jelly bean roms are pretty damn good too. Pacman(for a bit extra custom) or CM10
I would definently go with CM10.
After experiencing CM10, when you go on GB and ICS roms you will just feel like something is missing. I can't describe it but there's something.
And without doubt CM10 gives the smoothest and most user friendly experience.
Also to all you PAC fans out there, I did try all of the ROMs since v13 (inc. v17), but they are just never provided the same as CM10 did to me.
But choose for yourself if you have time. Try CM10, Forsaken's GB ROM, OptiMax, PAC, AOKP, JellySandwich, Ultimate HD (in that order)
xzeiP said:
I would definently go with CM10.
After experiencing CM10, when you go on GB and ICS roms you will just feel like something is missing. I can't describe it but there's something.
And without doubt CM10 gives the smoothest and most user friendly experience.
Also to all you PAC fans out there, I did try all of the ROMs since v13 (inc. v17), but they are just never provided the same as CM10 did to me.
But choose for yourself if you have time. Try CM10, Forsaken's GB ROM, OptiMax, PAC, AOKP, JellySandwich, Ultimate HD (in that order)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Though PAC has CM10 built into it. But I am kinda with you on that one. It just doesn't seem as smooth as CM10 alone.
FXP CM10
Sent from Xperia Ray powered by Jellybean using Tapatalk 2.
xzeiP said:
I would definently go with CM10.
After experiencing CM10, when you go on GB and ICS roms you will just feel like something is missing. I can't describe it but there's something.
And without doubt CM10 gives the smoothest and most user friendly experience.
Also to all you PAC fans out there, I did try all of the ROMs since v13 (inc. v17), but they are just never provided the same as CM10 did to me.
But choose for yourself if you have time. Try CM10, Forsaken's GB ROM, OptiMax, PAC, AOKP, JellySandwich, Ultimate HD (in that order)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are a gamer (like me) I don't really recommend ICS or Jelly Bean Roms. There are many apps and games that are incompatible. I haven't tested a Jelly Bean rom but I think CM10 is under development, I already tried CM9 and I have to say the UI is very nice, but I had problems with many games and apps and I don't have this problem with CM7 (Gingerbread). So I think CM 7.2 is the best Rom right now, but that's my opinion, haven't tried other roms, only CyanogenMod, but is really good.
Why is everyone recommending CM10?
Maybe i am doing something wrong, but for me it is sluggish like hell 3 out of 10 times i am using my phone. Unlocking, using the launcher, using the settings...
It seems to stable, but that alone does not win the game.
Stable + snappy: nxt bread (odexed version) and fosakengb.
Both are stock based GB ROMs and i only miss some convenience functions, like accessing the notification bar from the lockscreen.
If you ever used an iPhone or Windows Phone, it seems GB is the way to go. ICS and JB ROMs are just not there, when it comes to user experience. But they are feature rich.
Re. ICS & JellyBean.. Well, the ROM I'm currently using is Iced Bean - I seriously disliked all ICS ROMS till I found this one! The most elegant, snappy and stable ICS ROM I've used so far!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1911165
For Gingerbread I'd recommend JellyBread - hands-down my favourite GB ROM. Fast and pretty & lean and mean!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1834106
PS Both of these ROMS will also work on loocked bootloaders. :good:
Thanks Everyone!
So i think CM10 have more fans.
ok, I'll go for it. They're showing 2 days left for a new release, so i'll wait for it
And can anyone help me for a Question? On Cyanogenmod's website, I went to see the Project status and saw "ST18(i/a) - Ray - urushi - CM9 done / CM10 done"
Does that mean everything is working on CM10? everything?
definitely try P.A.C rom . For me the best JB ROM for RAY :good:
fuser1337 said:
Thanks Everyone!
Does that mean everything is working on CM10? everything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Front camera leads to FC.
After trying several ICS roms I've gone back to GB. I found that the ray just doesn't have the specs to run ICS as it should be. For a simple fast GB rom I'd suggest trying 4pda.ru stock repack rom with Aires kernal. It's a no nonsense rom so you can add the mods yet want. And you get the stability of stock.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1424121
Sent from my ST18i using xda premium
McQ666666 said:
After trying several ICS roms I've gone back to GB. I found that the ray just doesn't have the specs to run ICS as it should be. For a simple fast GB rom I'd suggest trying 4pda.ru stock repack rom with Aires kernal. It's a no nonsense rom so you can add the mods yet want. And you get the stability of stock.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1424121
Sent from my ST18i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try JB rom for RAY and you never gonna back to GB or ICS ...
I don't even get how people can recommend CM10 when P.A.C. is basically the same, but without all the "non-working" stuff. I usually love CM and nothing would have been possible on JB roms without them, but clearly at this point PAC is completely far ahead, meanwhile including all the CM engine and rom modifications as well as OAKP.
Kafka Datura said:
I don't even get how people can recommend CM10 when P.A.C. is basically the same, but without all the "non-working" stuff. I usually love CM and nothing would have been possible on JB roms without them, but clearly at this point PAC is completely far ahead, meanwhile including all the CM engine and rom modifications as well as OAKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
but sometimes startup of for instance 'settings' takes a while...
i hope that improves in the future, and then it will be my perfect rom.

How to make camera work in an AOSP/AOKP Rom

I have used nearly all AOSP and AOKP Roms and i haven't managed to make the camera work flawlessly. I have searched all over xda (and Internet) and tried various "solutions".
Camera app does not work at all with stock AOSP kernels but it works (this is very weird) with custom kernels like siyah and yank. Problem is that it still force closes all the time, especially with the flash enabled. My cam firmware is "ZD.. "
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Edit: I have only managed to have a nearly perfect camera experience with N. E. A. R. Aosp Rom and I am very curious what did the developer do.
the latest jellybam has zero issues with cam:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2159087
eytan123 said:
the latest jellybam has zero issues with cam:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2159087
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try it, thank you. Is there an external mod or camera apk that fixes the camera or is it just about the tweaks each dev puts into his Rom?
I ask because I love SlimBean and I don't want to change it!
nope, i don't know about a mod for this.
i tried a lot of things including matching and updating the cam firmware with stock rom.
tried different app's, kernels but always had this problem.
*could be that it fixed cause it's based on 4.2.2 can't tell for sure.
eytan123 said:
nope, i don't know about a mod for this.
i tried a lot of things including matching and updating the cam firmware with stock rom.
tried different app's, kernels but always had this problem.
*could be that it fixed cause it's based on 4.2.2 can't tell for sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera doesn't work for me in latest Jellybam. It still FCs unfortunately.
that's odd.
try to run this cam:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1746611
make sure that your cam firmware is correct

need your opinion on most stable rom

Hi, I've rooted a friends NT wth 1.4.3 using the SD card method. I am looking to change this thing to a traditional Android Tablet with Android ICS or higher. Any idea what is the best and most stable rom? How about Xylaon?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2169489
loveubuntu said:
Hi, I've rooted a friends NT wth 1.4.3 using the SD card method. I am looking to change this thing to a traditional Android Tablet with Android ICS or higher. Any idea what is the best and most stable rom? How about Xylaon?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2169489
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Against forum rules to post the "best" ROM. But my preferred ROM is CM 10.1 4.2.2. If you want a more stable version I suggest CM10. I just like using the most up to date ROM is why I use 4.2.2 build.
Pick whatever you want. Head over to the iamafanof website to find the ROM of your liking. He has CM, Paranoid Android and Xylaon. All do the same thing with slight "extra goodies".
datallboy said:
Against forum rules to post the "best" ROM. But my preferred ROM is CM 10.1 4.2.2. If you want a more stable version I suggest CM10. I just like using the most up to date ROM is why I use 4.2.2 build.
Pick whatever you want. Head over to the iamafanof website to find the ROM of your liking. He has CM, Paranoid Android and Xylaon. All do the same thing with slight "extra goodies".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your response. I wasn't really asking for best rom but people's opinion of which one is most stable. This is someone else's device and I don't want to be maintaining it. Xylaon is on it now and it seems pretty cool. I don't have access to sound files to test the sound. I've heard Android 4.2 variants have sound issues. Is that correct/
loveubuntu said:
Thank you for your response. I wasn't really asking for best rom but people's opinion of which one is most stable. This is someone else's device and I don't want to be maintaining it. Xylaon is on it now and it seems pretty cool. I don't have access to sound files to test the sound. I've heard Android 4.2 variants have sound issues. Is that correct/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not familiar with the Xyalon build so it might just be a bug in it. Different ROMs have different little bugs. I have CM10.1 build from succulant. I don't have audioproblems.
datallboy said:
I'm not familiar with the Xyalon build so it might just be a bug in it. Different ROMs have different little bugs. I have CM10.1 build from succulant. I don't have audioproblems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any major bugs you've found with cm10.1?
my brain is quickly turning to mud....spent the last 2 hours reading up on rooting this only to finally figure out it's a ****ing tablet and not a ****ing color . doing it for a friend's kid so kinda in the same situation as the op (looking for the best option for a maintenance free rom)
always thought cm is the best option for putting on another's device but feeling reluctant to leave it at cm10
loveubuntu said:
Thank you for your response. I wasn't really asking for best rom but people's opinion of which one is most stable. This is someone else's device and I don't want to be maintaining it. Xylaon is on it now and it seems pretty cool. I don't have access to sound files to test the sound. I've heard Android 4.2 variants have sound issues. Is that correct/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd suggest Succulent's CM10.0 build dated 12/31 http://iamafanof.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/cm10-0-jellybean-sdcard-img-for-nook-tablet/.
You can try running his various builds off SD first before picking one to install internally.
I second CM10 dated 1231. I have that on a NT used by a 9-year old, and it's doing its job beautifully.
When I tried higher builds on my NT stock browser has been a bit glitchy, and there has been a few minor problems while streaming video. Works flawless in CM10 1231 build!
(I visit a pretty poorly coded web site quite often, and I'm sure many problems are due to the poor site, but it doesn't alter the fact that it works well on CM 10 an not on higher builds!)
damngood98 said:
....spent the last 2 hours reading up on rooting this only to finally figure out it's a ****ing tablet and not a ****ing color .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahaha, I did the EXACT same thing when I first got this thing ages ago. Someone gave it to my wife for free and I was told to "make it work nice and keep it" :laugh:
I'm running Xylon now, but I've had the best battery life with AOKP (I could quite literally leave it unplugged for a week and it would still be 60+% battery, assuming it was off the whole time).
Only thing better for me was Stock. Xylon is close, but not as good.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
would also like to know what mod is stable with a working mic and is noob friendly in terms of installing
as of now im running android 2.3.7 ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1512373&highlight=cm7+all+in+one )
karnel 2.6.35.7-TeamB+
cyanogen mod
my main goal is to get the mic to work with team speak , skype , viber
mezozon said:
would also like to know what mod is stable with a working mic and is noob friendly in terms of installing
as of now im running android 2.3.7 ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1512373&highlight=cm7+all+in+one )
karnel 2.6.35.7-TeamB+
cyanogen mod
my main goal is to get the mic to work with team speak , skype , viber
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're using a VERY old ROM. Assuming you have it internal flashed all you need to do is copy the .zip ROM and GAPPS files (that you can download here) onto your SD card.
You have to preform a factory reset/wipe data, wipe cache, and wipe dalvik cache. So if you have data on your device you want to keep make sure to back it up.
Once you do that then install .zip from SD card and select the ROM and Gapps. Reboot your tablet and TADDA, CM10 is internal installed on your device!
I have some suggestions!
loveubuntu said:
Hi, I've rooted a friends NT wth 1.4.3 using the SD card method. I am looking to change this thing to a traditional Android Tablet with Android ICS or higher. Any idea what is the best and most stable rom? How about Xylaon?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2169489
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The most stable version of CyanogenMod is CM7(Gingerbread)
If you want the second most stable, that would have to be CM9 because CM10 still has a minor crash/sleep*STUCK* bug and some versions of it just dont work period. I have the NOOK Tablet 16GB with TWRP Installed, but having the "Unable to mount /data1 partition" error but will shortly be fixing that and i will be testing like a champ once again ^_^!!! *Im fixing my problem tonight before i go on a 13 hour trip
---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------
AndroidnWindowsHaxor said:
The most stable version of CyanogenMod is CM7(Gingerbread)
If you want the second most stable, that would have to be CM9 because CM10 still has a minor crash/sleep*STUCK* bug and some versions of it just dont work period. I have the NOOK Tablet 16GB with TWRP Installed, but having the "Unable to mount /data1 partition" error but will shortly be fixing that and i will be testing like a champ once again ^_^!!! *Im fixing my problem tonight before i go on a 13 hour trip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*ADD ON* CM9 IS A VERSION THAT IT JUST LIKE CYANOGENMOD10
Not meaning to yell but Android Ice Cream Sandwich has almost all of the features Jellybean has in store. but Jellybean supports the NOOK Color without the problems of the NOOK Tablet<--Kernel Difference + Hardware Difference(Thats the only problem with Android Jellybean
Cm10 was made into a stable version with its final release. I run it with no problems. CM10.1 however is very buggy. Still crashes and runs slow.
datallboy said:
You're using a VERY old ROM. Assuming you have it internal flashed all you need to do is copy the .zip ROM and GAPPS files (that you can download here) onto your SD card.
You have to preform a factory reset/wipe data, wipe cache, and wipe dalvik cache. So if you have data on your device you want to keep make sure to back it up.
Once you do that then install .zip from SD card and select the ROM and Gapps. Reboot your tablet and TADDA, CM10 is internal installed on your device!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe i know i just had lots of issues with the nook and at some point when everything worked i stopped messing around with it but now i want the team speak to work so its time for a technical adventure
do i need to get CMW 6 ( iv read that somewhere that u need cmw 6 for cm10 to work )?
u mean this (CM10.0 Jellybean for Nook Tablet w/ 10-Touchs Driver (12/31) FINAL)
im a bit nooby when it comes to this stuff
meanwhile ill get CMW 6 and try make it happen
mezozon said:
hehe i know i just had lots of issues with the nook and at some point when everything worked i stopped messing around with it but now i want the team speak to work so its time for a technical adventure
do i need to get CMW 6 ( iv read that somewhere that u need cmw 6 for cm10 to work )?
u mean this (CM10.0 Jellybean for Nook Tablet w/ 10-Touchs Driver (12/31) FINAL)
im a bit nooby when it comes to this stuff
meanwhile ill get CMW 6 and try make it happen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't need cwm recovery 6 to flash it. You can use recovery 5.*.*.*. (Latest version of 5).
You can replace the recovery.img if you want with the newest 6.*.*.*. The newest version is red. But you dont need to replace it.
thanks it works ill play around with it see how it goes

[dev][kexec] android development

This is a discussion and information thread for the progress of stock based rom development.
I want to keep you up to date for the current development progress and invite you to join or discuss about new projects.
First I want to introduce to you the people who are involved in this current project.
Hashcode (STS-Dev-Team)
Deveshmanish
Ravikirancg
alteredlikeness
Biotik
Each one here is working on its own projects, but we are statically in contact to help out each other, so this has some kind of a team character. But this is NOT something like a "closed team"! Everybody, every dev and everyone who wants is invited to be part of this new fast progressing kind of development for Roms, Kernels and all other Android stuff. I think we should not longer stay alone with our stuff because we can reach our goals much faster when working together - or at least being in contact and share our knowledge!
In example the last weeks have been full of success regarding to Kexec-, Kernel- and Stock-based development - with the big help of the people mentioned above!
Current Progress​
Yesterday we made it to boot Catalyst Rom (VZW .16 - based) on my GSM device with full working service - with the first stock Kexec kernel! This opens many new possibilities and brings our good old Razr on a new level - AGAIN!
Now we have a working kexec setup for stock based roms and I made a GSM- and a CDMA-Patch, so all users - no matter what region their devices are from - can run all stock-based rom - also no matter which stock kernel they have installed on their devices!
First, I will release a "Kexec-Patch" which can be flashed over ANY Stock-based rom to boot it on ANY device - including the needed network patches! The kernel has been finished and I will release it tonight. Note that this kernel is not modified in a way like JBX-Kernel! It is a copy of stock kernel which was made ready for kexec by the STS-Dev-Team!
Next, we make a Custom-Kernel for stock-based roms with mods like JBX-Kernel! The first Rom to run with it will be Catalyst v3!
We don't want to keep our work only for our projects - everyone should have access to it! Each dev should be able to use it for his work! It's free and open source - and it should behandled like this!
Devs are invited to join our group hangouts on Google Plus! Together we will make fast progress in all kind of development! PM me for access!
I will keep you up to date in this thread!
- reserved -
Excellent news! I was wondering, when you said full working service, did that happen to include 1080p video and HDMI? I know the other kexec Roms have these issues.
Regardless of my question, truly amazing work.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
jessel0001 said:
Excellent news! I was wondering, when you said full working service, did that happen to include 1080p video and HDMI? I know the other kexec Roms have these issues.
Regardless of my question, truly amazing work.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On kexec stock the camera seems working fully, yes. But service meant to be Networks.
so... in near future with the "new" kexec + f.e. cm 10.1 and we have everything working ?? or it will only fully work with 4.1.2 firmware... ??
Great ideea !
Thank you
The camera only works fine for Stock based roms because it uses the original cam libs. But we cannot use the cam libs on AOSP roms! Tghe cam drivers are partly closed source, that's what makes it difficult. But Hashcode is working on that.
Edit: Just released the patches, see dev section.
Ok new guy here.... What the he!! is the difference in kexec and catalyst can someone explain all this to me easily?? Im coming from a gnexus and have know idea what this really means. I gather it a good thing for all of us but it's all very confusing to me still. So for being the noob!!!!
Sent from my XT912 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
So if I flash the Patch on CM 10.1 or AOKP, the camera will not recording in Full HD?
justen7723 said:
Ok new guy here.... What the he!! is the difference in kexec and catalyst can someone explain all this to me easily?? Im coming from a gnexus and have know idea what this really means. I gather it a good thing for all of us but it's all very confusing to me still. So for being the noob!!!!
Sent from my XT912 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec is a method to bypass our Razr's locked bootloader and run Custom Kernels.
The main problem with the locked bootloader is that we cannot reun custom kernels - usually. And also we cannot use any stock kernel - i.e. when a GSM user wants to use a stock-based CDMA Custom rom he used to wipe the CID (region check) to be able to flash the CDMA kernel which is needed to run this. But thanks to the secure version which are being checked by bootloader users who have updated to Moto official JB cannot flash the VZW kernel anymore - so they cannot use the CDMA roms!
Now we have KExec! This allows us to run any rom on a custom kernel! The metnioned problems are history now.
But besides of that it allows us to run JB AOSP Roms on Custom Kernels - just like my JBX-Kernel.
You are coming from G-Nex? Well, you might know how many kernels are available for G-Nex - and what nice features they provide (OC, GPU OC, BLX, BLN, etc, etc..). My JBX-Kernel provides a lot of these features to the Razr owners All that wouldn't be possible without kexec.
rhyrlix said:
So if I flash the Patch on CM 10.1 or AOKP, the camera will not recording in Full HD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO! And I explained the reason already. PLEASE FORGET THAT VERY FAST!
And about the battery consumption? After flashed the patch, the battery life will be bad like CM 10.1 and AOKP?
rhyrlix said:
And about the battery consumption? After flashed the patch, the battery life will be bad like CM 10.1 and AOKP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, it will be like stock.
I need someones help! I have to rebuild the moto_crypto module to make the JBX-Stock-Kernel working on VZW-Based Roms!
But I am not really aware of shell script language. Could someone please tell me how to link the Makefile(s), etc to connect this module source to the kernel source?
Or at least read the build script you find in the linked source and tell me what exactly is set there (I understand most parts - but not enough)
https://github.com/dtrail/kernel_mapphone_kexec/tree/stock-mod/motorola/security/moto_crypto
Ediot: Nevermind, got it.
Question, using Motorola stock kernel is better than a custom one right? I know it may be stepping your heart dtrail, I experience certain reboot a day due to dos, so in order to get boot again, I will have to flash your kernel again. It is quite annoying indeed. Such problem does not exist in stock rom. You know, I choose Motorola because I trust in its built quality, I trust in its stability.
Apart from that, the new progress mentioned here means we can use Motorola kernel to run any aosp rom, am I figure out in the right track?
Thank you so much!
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
h0324879 said:
Question, using Motorola stock kernel is better than a custom one right? I know it may be stepping your heart dtrail, I experience certain reboot a day due to dos, so in order to get boot again, I will have to flash your kernel again. It is quite annoying indeed. Such problem does not exist in stock rom. You know, I choose Motorola because I trust in its built quality, I trust in its stability.
Apart from that, the new progress mentioned here means we can use Motorola kernel to run any aosp rom, am I figure out in the right track?
Thank you so much!
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You misunderstood. Please read the OP more carefully - I explained that question several times now (regarding to the benefits of the current kernel)
To your problem: I don't have that problem. My phone runs multiple days (until 1 week) without any problems (and not a single reboot). And for me the custom kernel is much better than stock because I get better battery life, performance and options. Many users reported the same in the kernel thread. So yours must be a device related or usage related problem.
I don't know your settings, so I cannot help you with that. You can do tjat: Make screenshots from all Trickster Mod pages that I can see your settings.
Although I'm using a Razr XT912,I'm so glad seeing all these development goin' so fast. Thanks a lot,dtrail1. You've been doing a great job for XT910 users especially this Razr community in general. I've been in love with your JBX kernel.
Sent from my XT897 using Tapatalk 2
Little update
Currently fixing 4.3 JBX. This could take some more time than thought before..But it will work, that's the most important thing now.
The Stock Core Kernel which is a direct JBX port for Stock based roms is almost finished! I will launch a testing phase this week.
MIUI is kind of special - who knows ? Actually I can boot and run the Stock Core kernel with it but the UI is kind of slow. The log is telling me nothing so I have to dig deeper.
But because I am working on all of these projects on my own it will take time. Be patient and stay tuned!
Besides of the Kernel(s) I am working together with Biotik on Catalyst Project and also currently merging STS-Dev-Team's progress on the completely rebuilt 3.0.31 and 3.0.88 Kernel....Great things are coming, yes! But I have to be on my own - Seems like that!
I am still waiting for someone's contribution into my projects - but also loosing hope slowly...
Thanks man
Is it possible to download it yet?

Categories

Resources