tizen to android port for gear 2 - Tizen Software Development

I'm looking at making a port of any android version to the gear 2 replacing the tizen os. I don't have a lot of experience in development. And have struggled to follow or find any guides on the matter.
Is anyone currently working on this
And want some help with graphic design. Or beta testing
Or would anyone help me start a port of my own
I have the gear 1 with the null custom rom
And my gear 2 is rooted
Also I have a kali Linux Vm
And all the SDK perquisites for Windows 8. But I also have an xp machine and a windows 7 machine
I've been waiting ever since I got my gear 2 for an android port searching almost daily for any news. But so far . Nothing
LET'S MAKE THIS HAPPEN

One major thing to solve is, how to replace OS...
So you need to know how your Gear is working...
How to dump memory...
How Bootloader is working...
How to change Firmware etc...
Is Bootloader secured...
Is Bootloader modifiable...
Check the other Gears... with other direction...
From Android to Tizen...
What is changed, what is same...
Is Gear JTAG enabled?
ADB and or SDB knowledge...
Tools...
Etc...
Good Luck.
Best Regards
Edit 1.
I mean here...
Galaxy Gear (SM-V700)
Before Android... have Tizen update...
How they did it?
Is Bootloader changed or whole Gear is lowest secured and you can execute every Linux Kernel you want...

V700XXUCNF1_V700OXACNF1_DBT.zip
If I check this upgrade... then I can see Bootloader inside.
sboot.bin
sboot.bin now contain text string Tizen....
So I think this is Tizen Bootloader...
I can see also zImage.bin
No idea how low protection/security of V700 Bootloader is...
Maybe it would be enough to compile proper kernel/zImage...
No idea if for V700 custom kernels exists...
If I have some time...
I will try to check Gear 2 files...
Maybe same strong or weak protection...
Maybe not zImage used but the Tizen kernel... uImage.bin
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception.do
Can't find Gear related source code...
Best Regards
Edit 1.
Memo to me...
V700 downgrade kit... back to Android...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2776157
And it seems some custom kernels/recovery available...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2610071
Gear 2 forum:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gear-2

If SM-R380 means Gear 2...
Good idea is to compare SM-V700 with SM-R380 Hardware...
Maybe same CPU?
Then maybe Bootloader sboot.bin... dangerous to try.
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2014/04/hood-samsung-gear-2-wearables-saving-power-using-tizen/
Code:
Exynos 3250
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-ga...umored-to-feature-a-dual-core-exynos-chipset/
Code:
Exynos 4212
Seems not equal... not confirmed...
Best Regards
Edit 1.
Searching for text string:
Exynos
...delivers results in sboot.bin
EXYNOS3250
or
EXYNOS_4212
So infos could be true...
No idea if sboot.bin is compatible between these 2 models....
This info is funny:
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2014/08/tizen-gear-2-custom-firmware-drops/
Gear 1 or 2 or both?

adfree said:
If SM-R380 means Gear 2...
Good idea is to compare SM-V700 with SM-R380 Hardware...
Maybe same CPU?
Then maybe Bootloader sboot.bin... dangerous to try.
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2014/04/hood-samsung-gear-2-wearables-saving-power-using-tizen/
Code:
Exynos 3250
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-ga...umored-to-feature-a-dual-core-exynos-chipset/
Code:
Exynos 4212
Seems not equal... not confirmed...
Best Regards
Edit 1.
Searching for text string:
Exynos
...delivers results in sboot.bin
EXYNOS3250
or
EXYNOS_4212
So infos could be true...
No idea if sboot.bin is compatible between these 2 models....
This info is funny:
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2014/08/tizen-gear-2-custom-firmware-drops/
Gear 1 or 2 or both?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone in the custom rom thread for the Gear 1 that was released yesterday, had reported it worked on his Gear 2. I asked if it was a typo, and he replied and said that the settings for sounds was the only thing not working. If it booted up for him it may run on the same tizen kernel. So the CPU's may be somewhat compatible. If the person isn't lying....lol.
Chris

Related

[Q] Arduino Mega ADK and JellyBean

Hey folks, I've been trying to get the Arduino Mega ADK to work with two of my devices and so far I'm been totally unsuccessful. Both my Nexus S and Nexus 7 seem to do nothing with connected to the Mega ADK.
So, here are the details and hopefully someone can help out.
First off, I'm experienced with Arduinos and µCs. I'm 100% sure that I've correctly compiled and flashed the demo sketch onto the ADK. In the serial monitor I can see that the ADK will boot and attempt to get the Android device to do something and fails (it tries this continually unless a device successfully enters accessory mode and responds).
Both these devices are supposed to have support for the ADK and I've checked the devices and both have the correct .xml and .jar files for doing so. However, I'm currently running CM10 on both devices and I'm wondering if perhaps the kernel doesn't have the accessory mode enabled or if there's another stumbling block inherent to CM10.
Doing some google research I see that certain updates (4.0.3) have broken ADK support in the past, so perhaps it's just a Jellybean issue? Is there a way of checking kernel options or flashing a kernel known to work? I'd like to narrow down some of the possible issues here.
Hey mate!
I had the same issue, I fixed by using the library version 2 from labs.arduino.cc/ADK. You can download it directly from here: labs.arduino.cc/uploads/ADK/GettingStarted/ArduinoADK-beta-001.zip.
From what I've read the problem is that Android 4.1 uses adk version 2 and has some incompatibilities with the previous version.
Best,
Alex
PD) Sorry for not hotlinking can't do it yet with this account
I've been using that version and still get no response from the Android device. I suppose I'll have to flash stock 4.1 and see if that works, Sadly there's very little proper documentation on this and not a lot of people seem interested in accessory mode devices.
Arduino Mega ADK Nexus 7 Tablet
SirLalala said:
Hey mate!
I had the same issue, I fixed by using the library version 2 from labs.arduino.cc/ADK. You can download it directly from here: labs.arduino.cc/uploads/ADK/GettingStarted/ArduinoADK-beta-001.zip.
From what I've read the problem is that Android 4.1 uses adk version 2 and has some incompatibilities with the previous version.
Best,
Alex
PD) Sorry for not hotlinking can't do it yet with this account
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi mate,
I hope that you are able to see this message. I have the similar issue. I tried using this version 2 of this library and when i compile the example code "demokil_20", i get the error " 'USB' does not name a type".
Please help me out here.
Best Regards,
Arslan
[email protected] said:
Hi mate,
I hope that you are able to see this message. I have the similar issue. I tried using this version 2 of this library and when i compile the example code "demokil_20", i get the error " 'USB' does not name a type".
Please help me out here.
Best Regards,
Arslan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same USB error. I haven't figured out the problem yet, but I was able to get another example from the version 2 adk library working with jelly bean. I think it was called termtime or something like that. It recognizes the phone the and will pop up saying theres an arduino accessory attached and there is no application to open for that accessory. You can change the example code to "Google" and "Demokit" to auto launch the Demokit.apk app.
I just got this arduino adk two days ago and only have one Android device, a Samsung Captivate with slimbean rom, to test it on.

First Firmware for Samsung Z3 available.

The first firmware for the Samsung Z3 is now available. Anyone had a play with it? It doesn't flash onto a TM1 dev device. I wonder why?
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/10...ware-now-available-to-download-z300hddu0aoj4/
Only theory because only research without device...
1.
TM1 device with reference Firmware from July interact only with THOR aka lthor as Download Tool...
How to identify what I have...
1.1
*#1234# should not show Versions info...
1.2
But su should be in bin folder so have ROOT access and could do funny dump action to check more...
SDB ROOT ON should work...
2.
Z3 or TM1 with Z3 Firmware...
2.1
*#1234# should show you Firmware Version
2.2
SDB ROOT ON maybe not work because NO Binary su in bin folder...
TM1 with Reference Firmware not work with ODIN because THOR is send as "handshake"...
Extract sboot.bin and search for text string:
Code:
ODIN
or
THOR
"Easiest" modification should be on Firmware package...
Code:
csc.img
dzImage
dzImage-recovery
modules.img
nvitem.bin
ramdisk-recovery.img
ramdisk.img
rootfs.img
[B][COLOR="Red"]sboot.bin
spl.img[/COLOR][/B]
SPRDCP.img
SPRDDSP.img
Remove sboot.bin and spl.img from package...
Then in theory device have second chance, if something is wrong, because old Bootloader are present and not overwritten...
For me 600 MB upload is tooooo much... sorry.
Please, if somebody try... then please copy and paste Odin log...
Thanx in advance.
TM1 user before stupid tests could dump eMMC before...(part of it).
Something like this:
Code:
sdb root on
sdb shell
dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/sdcard/FULLdump.bin
Output looks like this... in theory... here taken from Z1 or RD-PQ... forgotten which one... but after 4000 MB stops:
Code:
sh-4.1# dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/sdcard/FULLdump.bin
dd: writing to `/sdcard/FULLdump.bin': Die Datei ist zu gro+ƒ
8388608+0 records in
8388607+1 records out
4294967295 bytes (4,3 GB) copied, 444,287 s, 9,7 MB/s
You could dump less... but if your SD card is big enough...
In Z1 dump I can find text string ODIN after 35 MB... so sboot.bin is inside first 40 MB....
No idea if also in Z3 same location...
Will try to find PIT... all I can remember... TM1/Z3 has 1 partition more...
Best Regards
Little description v1 of Retail Z300 Firmware
Code:
csc.img-------------->CSC
dzImage-------------->Kernel
dzImage-recovery----->Kernel for Recovery Mode
modules.img----------> ?
nvitem.bin-----------> "NVitems"... "config"
ramdisk-recovery.img->RAMdisk for Recovery Kernel
ramdisk.img---------->RAMdisk for Kernel
rootfs.img----------->Filesystem
[COLOR="Red"][B]sboot.bin------------>Bootloader aka SBOOT
spl.img-------------->Bootloader[/B][/COLOR]
SPRDCP.img----------->MODEM (CP)
SPRDDSP.img---------->MODEM (CP) related
Red marked stuff is Bootloader related... risky if something goes wrong...
ash99 said:
The first firmware for the Samsung Z3 is now available. Anyone had a play with it? It doesn't flash onto a TM1 dev device. I wonder why?
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/10...ware-now-available-to-download-z300hddu0aoj4/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can Z3 firmware be compatible with RD-PQ device?
mapcuk said:
Can Z3 firmware be compatible with RD-PQ device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO!
Different Hardware.
Different Bootloader, different partitions, filename convention, many huge differences.
If you have RD-PQ... you could update to 2.3.1 Binary with lthor...
Best Regards
No. This is ONLY compatible with the Z3 SM-Z300H.
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Newer firmware is now available: http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/10...date-now-available-to-download-z300hodd0aoj6/
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
adfree said:
NO!
Different Hardware.
Different Bootloader, different partitions, filename convention, many huge differences.
If you have RD-PQ... you could update to 2.3.1 Binary with lthor...
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've installed 2.3.1 to RD-PQ.
It can load, Wi-Fi doesn't work, All apps are gone and many other glitches 8)
mapcuk said:
I've installed 2.3.1 to RD-PQ.
It can load, Wi-Fi doesn't work, All apps are gone and many other glitches 8)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have RD-PQ since few days... with 2.2...
I will try to use my Notebooks this year to update to 2.3.1... and see self...
I have no idea... maybe you have chance to got SM-Z300F:
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/10/video-russian-samsung-z3-sm-z3000f-gets-reviewed/
I have no idea if RD-PQ will see 2.4 Firmware...
Sorry.
But I am 99,9 % sure SM-Z300H and TM1 Firmware are incompatible with RD-PQ.
If you unpack/extract Firmware package you shoud see why...
Z3 Firmwarepackages contains all Bootloaders accept PIT file...
Why Bootloaders should be ready for RD-PQ aka GT-I9300?
Or Kernel?
Why 1 Kernel supports more then 1 device?
RD-PQ is old...
2 years + older as Z3...
I9300 and/or RD-PQ Hardware is cool enough... :good:
...but why should commercial Developers like Samsung concentrate on old Hardware...
See, I love RD-PQ/I9300:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2482563
I wished support never ends... but this is an dream.
Little example from now.
TM1 devices have Firmware from July... with beta 2.4
On RTL you can see SM-ZTM1 called devices with september Firmware...
And since Z300 + Firmware is avaliable...
We know that minimum 2 compiled Firmware from October exists... and Tizen API is on Z3 2.4.0.1
I have no idea, if TM1 will get Firmwareupdate...
Best Regards
I'm not complaining Just sharing my observations Tizen 2.3.1
If Samsung issued a ready Tizen phone I expected new firmware is more stable and usable.
And I got that Z3 firmware is incompatible.
Samsung Z3 gets second software / firmware update in India – Z300HODD0AOK1
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/11...tware-firmware-update-in-india-z300hodd0aok1/
new update
Z300HDDU0BOL2
BOL2 now also via Kies3 available...
and here for ODIN:
http://samsung-updates.com/device/?id=SM-Z300H
Tizen version increased... 2.4.0.2...
Best Regards
http://samsung-updates.com/device/?id=SM-Z300H
BOL4 via OTA 3,6 MB...
Best Regards
any change list?
bogdan_wrc said:
any change list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe new Tizen version inside...
2.4.0.3
Sorry, joke...
Maybe I will download Full BOL4 ... and try to find something...
Tizen Store Version changed ?
BOL2 is 1.4.1
In theory it would be much easier... to catch the TAR file... look inside...
Then you could see which files changed...
Example from Z1...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=59881027&postcount=120
Code:
delta.csc
delta.kernel
delta.modem
delta.ramdisk
delta.recovery
delta.rootfs
delta.ua
nvitem.bin
[B]sboot.bin[/B]
update.cfg
sboot.bin is for instance ever FULL Binary...
So for Z3 you can be sure... 1500 KB (50 %) from this FOTA (3,6 MB) update is Bootloader.
If someone could provide please the info...
I need only filename of Z3 FOTA Binary..
Something like
12345.bin
You could easily find this info in Logfile... after FOTA update...
Maybe someone could tell me please in private... PM...
I need not the full link... only Filename.
Than in advance.
I can not try self... no Z3...
Best Regards
same 1.4.1 at tizen store.
i dont have the update bin..sorry
Code:
Z300HDDU0BPB2
Z300HDDU0BOK3
Z300HODD0BPB2
Should be availble now...
Best Regards
yeap updated
Code:
Z300HDDU0BPC5
Z300HDDU0BPB7
Z300HODD0BPC5
Available via FOTA...
Not tested nor idea yet...
Best Regards

Any android port for samsung z3 in the works?

Hello,
Was curious to know if any android port is in the works for samsung z3.. or if its even possible?
Thanks.
You mean SM-Z300H?
Only since few weeks available in India?
New device in market?
Why the he.. you not buy Android handset?
1.
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/10...g-z3-now-available-to-download-z300hddu0aoj4/
Download Source Code for study:
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=z300h
Maybe first start with Custom Tizen Kernel?
If this work... Because I have no idea how hard Z300H is protected... KNOX is installed...
You could proceed with 2...
2.
How to start Android Kernel, if KNOX Bootloader...
Let the Game begin. :good:
Best Regards
adfree said:
You mean SM-Z300H?
Only since few weeks available in India?
New device in market?
Why the he.. you not buy Android handset?
1.
http://www.tizenexperts.com/2015/10...g-z3-now-available-to-download-z300hddu0aoj4/
Download Source Code for study:
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=z300h
Maybe first start with Custom Tizen Kernel?
If this work... Because I have no idea how hard Z300H is protected... KNOX is installed...
You could proceed with 2...
2.
How to start Android Kernel, if KNOX Bootloader...
Let the Game begin. :good:
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.... Why the hell Samsung didn't gift an equivalent android handset as a gift for employees in the fistive season? ?

Will Remix OS boot on x86 android tablet? Answer is unclear? Help

I am a Asus trio tx201la owner and were completely upset that asus offered no other updates beyond android 4.2 to the tablet part. I noticed that samsung did the exact same thing with the samsung galaxy tab 3 10.1 and so did Dell on the venue. The venue and the galaxy tab 3 have same intel atom z2560 cpu soc and is stuck on android 4.2.
Unlike the Asus Trio the Galaxy tab 3 got a lot more attention and thus a lot more custom rom attention.
The galaxy tab 3 has been updated to 7.1.1 with custom rom by linage OS see:
http://techbeasts.com/install-androi...lineageos-141/
Now How can that help the Trio. The Trio has the same soc and is detectable by the intel platform flash tool released in 2017:
https://01.org/android-ia/downloads/...lash-tool-lite
Stock 4.4.2 android provided by intel: https://01.org/android-ia/downloads/android-4.4.2r1-ia2
Then I found a guide on how to use the tool here: http://www.aryk.tech/2016/04/how-to-...ing-intel.html
So I thought I was off to the races to make the update. The problem was I needed a flash.xml and fake the galaxy tab 7.1.1 update onto my tablet but no where could I find this file and certainly not one meant for my tx201la tablet. So I was stuck once again with no update path.
Then I found Remix OS and thought I had something but nope, again I cant find any info on how to get remix to boot on a android tablet? Ive also looked at running chromium OS on my tablet but that update path also seems to be blocked. So is there an answer or is my x86 android tablet dead?
madhits45 said:
I am a Asus trio tx201la owner and were completely upset that asus offered no other updates beyond android 4.2 to the tablet part. I noticed that samsung did the exact same thing with the samsung galaxy tab 3 10.1 and so did Dell on the venue. The venue and the galaxy tab 3 have same intel atom z2560 cpu soc and is stuck on android 4.2.
Unlike the Asus Trio the Galaxy tab 3 got a lot more attention and thus a lot more custom rom attention.
The galaxy tab 3 has been updated to 7.1.1 with custom rom by linage OS see:
http://techbeasts.com/install-androi...lineageos-141/
Now How can that help the Trio. The Trio has the same soc and is detectable by the intel platform flash tool released in 2017:
https://01.org/android-ia/downloads/...lash-tool-lite
Stock 4.4.2 android provided by intel: https://01.org/android-ia/downloads/android-4.4.2r1-ia2
Then I found a guide on how to use the tool here: http://www.aryk.tech/2016/04/how-to-...ing-intel.html
So I thought I was off to the races to make the update. The problem was I needed a flash.xml and fake the galaxy tab 7.1.1 update onto my tablet but no where could I find this file and certainly not one meant for my tx201la tablet. So I was stuck once again with no update path.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, you do not want to flash the Galaxy Tab 3 ROM, since while they do share the same CPU and chipset, the same can probably not be said about the rest of the components, from the screen to speaker(s) to the vibration motor (if it has one), so you may well be left with a tablet that barely functions.
madhits45 said:
Then I found Remix OS and thought I had something but nope, again I cant find any info on how to get remix to boot on a android tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About Remix OS, it depends on whether you have a standard EFI (yes, there are 32-bit EFIs) or BIOS, or rather an Andtoid bootloader like most ARM Android devices.
madhits45 said:
Ive also looked at running chromium OS on my tablet but that update path also seems to be blocked. So is there an answer or is my x86 android tablet dead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is running Chromium OS not an option for you?
Could it be related to the BIOS/EFI/bootloader?
moriel5 said:
First, you do not want to flash the Galaxy Tab 3 ROM, since while they do share the same CPU and chipset, the same can probably not be said about the rest of the components, from the screen to speaker(s) to the vibration motor (if it has one), so you may well be left with a tablet that barely functions.
About Remix OS, it depends on whether you have a standard EFI (yes, there are 32-bit EFIs) or BIOS, or rather an Andtoid bootloader like most ARM Android devices.
Why is running Chromium OS not an option for you?
Could it be related to the BIOS/EFI/bootloader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the galaxy tab 3 consideration, doesn't android use a generic display driver making this possible? I get how some of the parts could be different but it would seem that generic driver support may fill in the gaps, no? Apparently I could get there with MultiROM and see if it at least will boot. It may not I guess. Am i just wasting my time?
Chrimium OS would be great the problem is how to. I look into getting chromium os onto this tablet but all the info was related to installing on a intel pc with a bios. My tablet has android bootloader and I guess that is the big problem. However it seems that if you have root access it should be possible to change the boot kernel that loads or is that not possible? Gentoo is linux just like android so it should be possible to bypass the boot process somehow. Any how to's to do this? Ive googled to no end and it seems all the pieces are there but not any connection between them to run on a z2560 soc like mine.
madhits45 said:
On the galaxy tab 3 consideration, doesn't android use a generic display driver making this possible? I get how some of the parts could be different but it would seem that generic driver support may fill in the gaps, no? Apparently I could get there with MultiROM and see if it at least will boot. It may not I guess. Am i just wasting my time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In terms of display driver support, while ignoring the rest of the hardware, it depends on how the ROM was compiled, and even if you manage to get a picture, unless the screen gets properly detected, you'll only get a resolution of 800x600.
Plus, the touch sensor on the screen requires a completely different driver, to which, as far as I know, there is no standard.
madhits45 said:
Chrimium OS would be great the problem is how to. I look into getting chromium os onto this tablet but all the info was related to installing on a intel pc with a bios. My tablet has android bootloader and I guess that is the big problem. However it seems that if you have root access it should be possible to change the boot kernel that loads or is that not possible? Gentoo is linux just like android so it should be possible to bypass the boot process somehow. Any how to's to do this? Ive googled to no end and it seems all the pieces are there but not any connection between them to run on a z2560 soc like mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Android bootloader is based upon Coreboot, however it is specifically built to only boot system's that adhere to Google's boot procedure standards, so while it is theoretically possible to boot any Linux distro with it, you'll need to find one that was specially compiled for it.
The BIOS and EFI utilize completely a different standard, which means that to get a BIOS/EFI complient system to boot, you'll need to completely replace the bootloader, regardless of root or custom kernels.
And unless someone had already compiled one for your device, you're looking at a feat that is way above most people (even experienced enthusiasts), since this is goes much deeper than the OS.
While in my opinion, the time spent researching this is definitely worth it, unless you find a custom-built BIOS or EFI, or you learn how to build kernels and ROMs (the latter is easier), your tablet is pretty much stuck at where it is for the time being.
That said, I prefer to look at this kind of situation optimistically, without deluding anyone.
The current situation may be rather bleak, and the chances of getting out of it may be slim at the moment, however they exist, and they are slim at the current moment, nothing given about the future.
While we shouldn't get high hopes, we must not extinguish them either.
Thanks for the info. Ill keep looking. I bet some amazing hack will come out in the future to bypass the boot process. Multirom already sorta does this, so the least I can do is test it.
madhits45 said:
Thanks for the info. Ill keep looking. I bet some amazing hack will come out in the future to bypass the boot process. Multirom already sorta does this, so the least I can do is test it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too am sure of it, however I try to be wary at the same time.
I'd like to point you in the direction of Coreboot and Libreboot for information on some of the possibilities.
I'll check them out..
Update: looks like there sorta replacements for a bios. Maybe the devs will attempt an android bootloader port.
madhits45 said:
I'll check them out..
Update: looks like there sorta replacements for a bios. Maybe the devs will attempt an android bootloader port.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are open-source implementations of EFI, SeaBIOS is the BIOS equivalent.
moriel5 said:
They are open-source implementations of EFI, SeaBIOS is the BIOS equivalent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://w3bsit3-dns.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=701551&st=0
This thread pretty much sums up what you also said, even the same soc wont have the same exact parts and thus isnt able to boot.
madhits45 said:
https://w3bsit3-dns.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=701551&st=0
This thread pretty much sums up what you also said, even the same soc wont have the same exact parts and thus isnt able to boot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is true, but at least you can try disassembling what you can to allow skilled developers to, at the very least, take a look.
moriel5 said:
That is true, but at least you can try disassembling what you can to allow skilled developers to, at the very least, take a look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'll look into it. Since Asus also made a tablet only tx201la called the tx201laf (released only in France) could I use the Intel flash tool to flash it's Ron? See: https://www.asus.com/supportonly/TX201LAF/HelpDesk_BIOS/
At least it's an update to android 4.4.
madhits45 said:
Yeah I'll look into it. Since Asus also made a tablet only tx201la called the tx201laf (released only in France) could I use the Intel flash tool to flash it's Ron? See: https://www.asus.com/supportonly/TX201LAF/HelpDesk_BIOS/
At least it's an update to android 4.4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would first make sure that hardwarewise, they are indeed the same, even though this does look pretty good.
moriel5 said:
That is true, but at least you can try disassembling what you can to allow skilled developers to, at the very least, take a look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gave it a shot with standard update procedure & no go. Says hardware ids don't match. I can't use Intel flash tool cuz Asus image is raw format with no flash.xml. so I'm still screwed.
madhits45 said:
Gave it a shot with standard update procedure & no go. Says hardware ids don't match. I can't use Intel flash tool cuz Asus image is raw format with no flash.xml. so I'm still screwed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please send me a flash.xml for the samsung tablet?
I'm by no means an expert, however I may be able to glean some information from it that may help towards building one for your ASUS tablet.
Unfortunately that is what stopped me from flashing the galaxy tab 3 linageos image on my tx201la tablet, there is no flash.xml included because you need to flash via custom recovery.
madhits45 said:
Unfortunately that is what stopped me from flashing the galaxy tab 3 linageos image on my tx201la tablet, there is no flash.xml included because you need to flash via custom recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm...
Then I'll need to search for such a file when I'll have the time.
This should also help me with a small no-name tablet my father had bought.
moriel5 said:
Hmm...
Then I'll need to search for such a file when I'll have the time.
This should also help me with a small no-name tablet my father had bought.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm looking into multi rom which may offer some sorta option. Take a look at that.
Or this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/development/intel-android-devices-root-temp-cwm-t2975096
madhits45 said:
I'm looking into multi rom which may offer some sorta option. Take a look at that.
Or this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/development/intel-android-devices-root-temp-cwm-t2975096
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That looks great, even if it is pretty outdated.
I'll test it out when I have the time.
moriel5 said:
That looks great, even if it is pretty outdated.
I'll test it out when I have the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did the flash with multi rom go?
madhits45 said:
How did the flash with multi rom go?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, since I have managed to find bootloader unlocks for my tablets, in the end I had never gotten to test it out.

General [Info] Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite

See:
Samsung's Galaxy Tab A7 Lite has leaked once again before launch
The upcoming Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite has leaked once again via unofficial press renders that have been shared by Evan Blass.
www.xda-developers.com
I love the tablet, bought two of the 4GB/64GB for $149 each directly from Samsung site.
Well worth the money, I got them for gaming and watching videos, web surfing, really great tablets.
Can this tablet be rooted ?
Good
thatha said:
Can this tablet be rooted ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at this precise moment. Also, it has Knox security in tow...
thatha said:
Can this tablet be rooted ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
impreza233 said:
Not at this precise moment. Also, it has Knox security in tow...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impreza thank you for making me rest.....I've been surfing online finding answers if that tablet can be rooted...please let me know if you guys found more info..thank you
Bought this thinking it was an upgrade from my Galaxy tab a 8.0 but since it's one ui core it's missing many features. Trying to trade it in now but it's past the 15 days. There's no smart view to mirror to any tv easily, theres no network file manager in my files (can't access G drive or any others).
Just make sure you know what you're buying. It's not lite because of being smaller than A7, it's a stripped down OS and the features can't be installed afterwards (have tried many apks). I didn't want a big tablet, wanted a mid size tablet with upgraded CPU.
jmckeejr said:
Bought this thinking it was an upgrade from my Galaxy tab a 8.0 but since it's one ui core it's missing many features. Trying to trade it in now but it's past the 15 days. There's no smart view to mirror to any tv easily, theres no network file manager in my files (can't access G drive or any others).
Just make sure you know what you're buying. It's not lite because of being smaller than A7, it's a stripped down OS and the features can't be installed afterwards (have tried many apks). I didn't want a big tablet, wanted a mid size tablet with upgraded CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with that. If you are sure you know what you're buying, the experience of the A7 Lite isn't bad. One UI Core is the same stripped down OS in the regular A7 (Snapdragon 662) and in the A7 Lite. CPU works very fluid if you tweak some settings (default One UI animations are awfully slow). Battery lasts A LOT (8,5-9 hours SOT). Smart View was removed and changed in all One UI devices with the upgrade to Android 11/One UI 3.0 (regular and Core), and it was replaced with Google Cast native screen mirroring (ergo Chromecast).
Use Solid Explorer or Amaze if you want to access network file places. It works well on my side.
Despite being a Mediatek tablet, you wont't find anything MTK-related in the tablet. Samsung has its software very well masked. And I think that, in Helio P22T, Mediatek vulnerabilities have been fixed with security monthly patches.
KINGJAY684 said:
Impreza thank you for making me rest.....I've been surfing online finding answers if that tablet can be rooted...please let me know if you guys found more info..thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess that MTK-su has been fixed on Android 11... But I think that I could boot something with DSU Loader, which is available...
impreza233 said:
I guess that MTK-su has been fixed on Android 11... But I think that I could boot something with DSU Loader, which is available...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wanted to chime in here and say that I successfully rooted the tablet using the same method for the Lite as the regular A7 using THIS GUIDE. Obviously it tripped Knox but I needed it rooted for my use case. One note is that when you download the stock firmware with an application like Samsung Firmware Downloader, make sure you choose the correct Model and Region. These can be found in the settings on the tablet.
Is it possible to enable Google Discover for default launcher?
I bought Galaxy Tab A7 Lite LTE SM-T225 3/32GB and it works quite nice. Small and good device. Would be cool to see on it clean Android or LineageOS (fingers crossed). There is not too many ~8 inch tablets today with the latest Android version.
thatha said:
Can this tablet be rooted ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it can
I've been working on porting TWRP for AOSP Android 11 to this device but have run into some roadblocks.
I currently have TWRP running but touch is not working and I can't seem to get Data R/W with the current tools available. It's possible it's an error in my build or maybe a workflow problem.
If anyone out there with more experience is doing the same or wants to help me sort some things out, please let me know.
I purchased the SM-T225 LTE 4/64GB model, a good device, but there was a problem on the latest T225XXU1AUH5 & UI3 firmware, specifically with a modem... after the end of the call, the mobile network disappears, and after rebooting Baseband Unknown Flashing does not help, only resetting the data helps, but before the next call... The device had Root rights, but is now installed stock firmware and blocked the bootloader, but the problem remains... At the same time, if you install the old modem UDA,UE3,UF2 , it works without problems... Has anyone encountered anything like this?
My only disappointment is that knox is included. I came from tab A 8.0 2019 which has no knox
tagcart said:
Just wanted to chime in here and say that I successfully rooted the tablet using the same method for the Lite as the regular A7 using THIS GUIDE. Obviously it tripped Knox but I needed it rooted for my use case. One note is that when you download the stock firmware with an application like Samsung Firmware Downloader, make sure you choose the correct Model and Region. These can be found in the settings on the tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering if you have the 64gb version with 4gb of ram and if it has a 32bit or 64bit version of the android OS
BadCase.org said:
I was wondering if you have the 64gb version with 4gb of ram and if it has a 32bit or 64bit version of the android OS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a SM-T225 LTE 4 / 64Gb model. 64-bit model, 3 / 32Gb variant is the same in parameters, except for the amount of memory ...
Screenshots from the Phone Info program:
Bought one earlier today for a second screen for browsing while I'm gaming on the laptop. Got way more than I expected for such a cheap price. Debloated and tweaked, I really can't complain.
davedoucette said:
Yes it can
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would you please help me if i want to root the sm-t220 model for a7 lite. i've tried everything, I've failed. T220XXU1AUJ1

Categories

Resources