I found this on one of the droid sites I like to read. I usually find about all my ROMs here. I haven't tested it out, but happy it's out.
http://www.droidforums.net/threads/cyanogenmod-on-the-one-plus-2.284831/
I just figured out they are unofficial. No wonder. Sorry
Yeah, unfortunately it's not official yet. It probably will never be.
What's the point of this? The thread for CM is already open for a few weeks now here on the forum. Why link to an external source?
The point was I thought it was an official CM rom. Finding an official rom on an outside site was unusual and a mistake on my part for not checking thoroughly.
eegman said:
The point was I thought it was an official CM rom. Finding an official rom on an outside site was unusual and a mistake on my part for not checking thoroughly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's OK, mistakes happen. Next time, request the thread to be deleted using the report button.
I think this has ran it's course.
Thread closed.
Darth
Forum Moderator
Related
http://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_vendor_cyanogen/blob/froyo/CHANGELOG.mkdn
Is it testing? Or released?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I hate you
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Is that really working or is it just "in development" still?
Hyao, gtfo, you are a spammer and/or moron.
Well it says RC so I dont think its fully stable yet
Why don't you do two things:
Add "question" to your thread's title so that forum viewers don't burst in excitement as they see a thread labeled CyanogenMod and think that a release candidate is ready for download.
Post questions in the Q&A section. If a CyanogenMod thread is going to be in the development section, it should be about development.
"Builds for each device are slowly hitting the mirrors. ..and before you ask, there's no Vibrant or apps2ext support."
http://twitter.com/#!/cyanogen/statuses/28961699673
well, this is what cyanogen tweeted..
"Builds for each device are slowly hitting the mirrors. ..and before you ask, there's no Vibrant or apps2ext support."
so yeah, no vibrant support
it is release now.......there is an instruction on flashing...
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Full_Update_Guide_-_Samsung_Galaxy_S_(Vibrant)
gl3nng said:
it is release now.......there is an instruction on flashing...
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Full_Update_Guide_-_Samsung_Galaxy_S_(Vibrant)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not to sound rude, but... ummm... can you read?
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.p...msung_Galaxy_S_(Vibrant)#Flashing_CyanogenMod
"NOTE: As of right now CyanogenMod is not available for the Samsung Vibrant. Please check the wiki or the Samsung Galaxy S sub-forum for updates."
It's not available for vibrant right now
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
kuhan said:
not to sound rude, but... ummm... can you read?
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.p...msung_Galaxy_S_(Vibrant)#Flashing_CyanogenMod
"NOTE: As of right now CyanogenMod is not available for the Samsung Vibrant. Please check the wiki or the Samsung Galaxy S sub-forum for updates."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DooooooooooooooooD - I'm telling Mom on you for lying........... Maybe soon eh.
gl3nng said:
it is release now.......there is an instruction on flashing...
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Full_Update_Guide_-_Samsung_Galaxy_S_(Vibrant)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you would have clicked on your own link you would realize that you are wrong...wow, I now see why devs leave xda, it's a shame really, us users need to be more aware. the only person (okay not the only) that didn't post his roms here was htc clay for the g1 but someone would post it here "with his permission" not just random post like this one...it's not hard ppl just do your homework before you post something...
Well I got CM7 on mine so booya. I'mma take a real blurry pic and pr0f it for all the cool android sites to be like YAAA new rumor GINGERBRAEDDDDDDDDDDD
Anderdroid said:
Well I got CM7 on mine so booya. I'mma take a real blurry pic and pr0f it for all the cool android sites to be like YAAA new rumor GINGERBRAEDDDDDDDDDDD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet...i got mine tooo
Anderdroid said:
Well I got CM7 on mine so booya. I'mma take a real blurry pic and pr0f it for all the cool android sites to be like YAAA new rumor GINGERBRAEDDDDDDDDDDD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Daaaaaaaaaaannnnngggggg Anderdroid - will ya post a link? lol........
BTW - Love your AOSP 1.3 - Runs well with Manhattan. d/l'ng 1.4 now.
Thanks for your work!
kuhan said:
not to sound rude, but... ummm... can you read?
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.p...msung_Galaxy_S_(Vibrant)#Flashing_CyanogenMod
"NOTE: As of right now CyanogenMod is not available for the Samsung Vibrant. Please check the wiki or the Samsung Galaxy S sub-forum for updates."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before anything else....title of the forum is not Cynogenmod for vibrant....lol....
Actually it looks like there is a RC0 release foor the Vibrant but it is likely only available for the devs:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/8302-the-state-of-the-galaxy/
It appears a reminder may be in order, about the purpose of the development fora on XDA.
If you have developed a ROM, or are working with others to do so, the development forum is somewhere to discuss and share ideas, post useful feedback and logs or crash dumps, and to discuss a common goal developers are trying to achieve.
It is NOT the place to post your question because it gets higher traffic, or because more experienced users frequent it. Doing this just annoys those who are working on the device, and drives them away. Developers don't want to wade through 20 threads of "Help me urgently" to find their threads for porting and fixing camera issues etc. Similarly, if a thread is designated as discussion for developers say, porting a camera fix, please do not post in there asking "When will it be ready?", "Can I flash this yet?" etc. This is both completely disrespectful to those working on the project (you evidently haven't read the important posts in the thread), and also is making it harder for developers to find comments from other developers or testers when required.
Similarly, don't make loads of "Thanks for your work here" posts in an active development thread. It's just as annoying to developers as asking when something will be ready. If a ROM is complete, then go ahead and thank the developer if you wish, but don't go into threads for devs only, and interrupt it to post "thanks". It's basically spamming, and is treated as such.
If you are posting in development, you should have read every sticky and notice there, and should be actively developing or helping in the development of something. Developing isn't installing a ROM, or using a tweak, it's creating a ROM or other hack or tweak. If you haven't read for several days before starting out on XDA, you are likely about to ask something already solved. I registered on XDA when I first wanted to post, and that was to join in a discussion on something. Sure, join up and ask a question, but read the information available in General and Q&A first, as your question will have been asked before. Search is your friend here, become familiar with it.
Regarding when to post in development if you are not actually developing something, there is one occasion where it's acceptable. If you find a leak of a new ROM, which isn't already posted, and you verify it's legitimacy via either running it, or based on the source you obtained it from, then this is assisting in development, and should be posted in development. If you want to ask when a leak will be available use search first, then if not already in discussion, open a thread in general or Q&A.
If you have a problem flashing a ROM, this is NOT related to development. It's up to you to determine if it is specific to a particular ROM, and post useful information in that developer's existing thread for the ROM. If it happens on more than one ROM, and isn't a known issue (remember you should read several times more words than you post), then find out what you are doing wrong. Check guides written by others, try to repeat the problem and see if it happens every time. Something needs to be reproducible to be fixed effectively.
Once you have identified what you need help with go to the device Q&A forum (general if device lacks one), and make a clear, informative thread that explains the issue, and what you have tried doing to fix it. Did you re-download the ROM? Did you ask a friend to flash it for you, to reduce chance of user error? What steps (exactly) did you follow? What errors did you see (exact wording)? Did you double check all the steps? Did you do a wipe or hard reset?
If you make a clear, concise, yet detailed post, you will find help forthcoming, and should get the problem sorted very quickly. If someone suggests you try something, report back on what happened, did it work etc. Then, next time someone has this issue and searches, they will find this and have a verified and tested solution.
So remember... before you start a thread in development, ask yourself what you are developing. If you can't answer, then stop, step away from the post button, and think about where you are posting. Would it be better in General or Q&A, or is some more time with your best friend, search, required?
What is ASUS doing to resolve the defective GPS on every Prime? Is it going to be a software/firmware fix or are they going to physically replace something? They did acknowledge the issue by now surely correct?
Why the heck do you need a new thread...we got the other one perfectly fine...this isn't a FIX...misleading title!
Yeah, I feel dooped.
Seriously, I thought you had an "OFFICIAL FIX" and since you don't have one this thread is completely useless!!! Please close this thread and have everything put in the other GPS thread!!
nxp3 said:
Why the heck do you need a new thread...we got the other one perfectly fine...this isn't a FIX...misleading title!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too many pages to sift through and no answers.
So you expect an answer to magically appear here since there isn't one in the other thread? I don't mean to be a d!ck, but this makes no sense!
doeboy1984 said:
So you expect an answer to magically appear here since there isn't one in the other thread? I don't mean to be a d!ck, but this makes no sense!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didnt read through all 20 pages just the last 3
Would the mods consider closing or merging this thread.
Next time you post a question, please prefix a "Q:" on the title. The post is very misleading.
And the other posters are right, there is already a thread on this topic. Mods should merge or delete this thread.
Jason
This thread has a horribly misleading title. There is no 'official GPS fix'.
The OP posted this exact same question in the GPS issues thread and received answers but decided to make his own thread about the same issue. The OP doesn't want to read through the many pages in that thread to get the info he seeks, then why are you on the forums if you don't want to read the info about an issue that you have.
Closing as there is already another thread about this same issue:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1404646
A lot of people on facebook are asking this question. Samsung's official page said that Official ICS will be available on the 1st march. Does any one know whether it will be released today or not?
You deserve a ban for making this thread.
sohebq said:
Samsung's official page said that Official ICS will be available on the 1st march.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did you get this?
MistahBungle said:
You deserve a ban for making this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed
MistahBungle
i think you need to update your sig to:
XDA and ICS...Now with 97.28% more fanboys !
these ics threads are getting ridiculous now...
Done
But yes, it started being ridiculous a month ago.
Darkside Agent said:
MistahBungle
i think you need to update your sig to:
XDA and ICS...Now with 97.28% more fanboys !
these ics threads are getting ridiculous now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One does not simply ask questions like this
EPIC^FACEPALM
Are you serious? It's in the freezer man!
Sent from my GT-I9100T
MistahBungle said:
You deserve a ban for making this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungGalaxyS2forum?sk=wall&filter=1
-
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Samsung-Galaxy-S2/133233023383166?sk=wall&filter=1
-
https://www.facebook.com/Samsung.Galaxy.S.II.extragsm?ref=ts
Read here before saying anything. If you dead and blind, I can't say anything.
anshmiester78900 said:
One does not simply ask questions like this
EPIC^FACEPALM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read here.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s2-ice-cream-sandwich-update-coming-march-1-69238/
-
http://www.knowyourmobile.com/blog/...andwich_to_hit_samsung_galaxy_s2_march_1.html
-
http://androidadvices.com/samsung-galaxy-s2-official-ics-march-ota-update/
sohebq said:
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungGalaxyS2forum?sk=wall&filter=1
-
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Samsung-Galaxy-S2/133233023383166?sk=wall&filter=1
-
https://www.facebook.com/Samsung.Galaxy.S.II.extragsm?ref=ts
Read here before saying anything. If you dead and blind, I can't say anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok firstly that is not an official and i mean OFFICIAL facebook page of Samsung. Second Sammy has never said that they are going to release it today. They said Q1. So in fact that could still mean anytime today till end of March. So please before opening threads that are not necessary please do your reading before jumping the gun. And if you really want that ICS so bad go and flash the leaks with modifications in the Android section or use Foxhound or cm9. Thank you and goodnight.
And yes you do deserve a permanent ban for opening thread that is pure garbage and no one cares anymore.
Rant over and sorry for my language to everyone
Stifler69 said:
Ok firstly that is not an official and i mean OFFICIAL facebook page of Samsung. Second Sammy has never said that they are going to release it today. They said Q1. So in fact that could still mean anytime today till end of March. So please before opening threads that are not necessary please do your reading before jumping the gun. And if you really want that ICS so bad go and flash the leaks with modifications in the Android section or use Foxhound or cm9. Thank you and goodnight.
And yes you do deserve a permanent ban for opening thread that is pure garbage and no one cares anymore.
Rant over and sorry for my language to everyone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, really, am 1 the only one who opened a thread in this forum? who are you to instruct about ban. Read the comments of people on these pages and then come to me.
sohebq said:
Oh, really, am 1 the only one who opened a thread in this forum? who are you to instruct about ban. Read the comments of people on these pages and then come to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because you are opening a thread that has nothing informative or actually anything useful or asking anything that values a reason to open a thread for..hence why you are getting all the negative posts from users. because this has been asked time and time again and people get the same answer. nothing has been made official by samsung about ICS release and to be honest with you with the amount of threads being open regarding the topic of ICS people are getting fed up with it. Hence why you get what you get here. And if you want to vent your anger there are threads in the general forum were you can make your point across. And i rather wait for sammy to tell me when it is going to be release instead of a blogger
sohebq said:
Oh, really, am 1 the only one who opened a thread in this forum? who are you to instruct about ban. Read the comments of people on these pages and then come to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, if I read I will find a post on fb by someone who knows someone who knows someone who works for Samsung as a cleaning lady. While she was emptying the rubbish bins she found a note with the release date scribbled on it.
Man, Samsung really should start using paper shredders.
Breaking news - ICS will look like the leaked LPH but with bugs fixed.
Sent from my GT-I9100T
Listen smartarse. We don't give a **** what some idiots on PooBook said. We're sick and tired of muppets like you clogging up this forum with mindless crap like this.
You deserve the kicking you're getting in this thread so STFU & lay there/take it.
sohebq said:
Oh, really, am 1 the only one who opened a thread in this forum? who are you to instruct about ban. Read the comments of people on these pages and then come to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stifler69 said:
because you are opening a thread that has nothing informative or actually anything useful or asking anything that values a reason to open a thread for..hence why you are getting all the negative posts from users. because this has been asked time and time again and people get the same answer. nothing has been made official by samsung about ICS release and to be honest with you with the amount of threads being open regarding the topic of ICS people are getting fed up with it. Hence why you get what you get here. And if you want to vent your anger there are threads in the general forum were you can make your point across. And i rather wait for sammy to tell me when it is going to be release instead of a blogger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are saying as if I am trolling over here. I am being a part of XDA for over 6 months now and I never created any useless thread. The only thing is that those pages made us super excited for the march 1.I visit those pages everyday and answer the questions posted by people. Personally, I will never use the samsung's official ICS because of Touch Wiz. I will wait for CM9.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1401673
Discuss the release of ICS in that thread please.
Closed
Some pretty unfair responses in here, To be fair the thread is pointless and the OP should have properly researched the subject before posting, that however, does not give you the right to insult anyone.
Play nicely kiddies.
Hey guys, so I've seen a few HellRaised roms, carried over from the 9100 and was wondering if it's against forum rules or copyright (assuming developers have some right to their roms if disclosed), to upload a HellRaised rom (considering you're basically re-uploading their original) IF PROPER CONTRIBUTION AND THANKS ARE GIVEN. As well as stating that you are not the original owner. Is it still a problem? I've just been thinking of uploading a couple that I noticed others have done in the past, but mysteriously their download links stopped working....so, just wondering, is it against the rules?
Logic says you ask the developer for permission to upload it elsewhere first, if they say yes, sweet. If not, that's the way it is.
If the developer has stopped developing & can't be contacted, dunno. Tricky I guess.
VanillaCracker said:
Hey guys, so I've seen a few HellRaised roms, carried over from the 9100 and was wondering if it's against forum rules or copyright (assuming developers have some right to their roms if disclosed), to upload a HellRaised rom (considering you're basically re-uploading their original) IF PROPER CONTRIBUTION AND THANKS ARE GIVEN. As well as stating that you are not the original owner. Is it still a problem? I've just been thinking of uploading a couple that I noticed others have done in the past, but mysteriously their download links stopped working....so, just wondering, is it against the rules?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright yeah I mean I understood the whole not posting like on another forum but I just meant reposting on the same forum, basically. Different section, but same forum. I will conclude it as "don't be stupid" then. Thanks
Anyone gotten theirs yet?
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/android-5-0-1-now-reportedly-live-verizon-driven-lg-g3-users-us-1490177
The software version is 23A. This already has at least three threads Kev.
zakkyzombie said:
The software version is 23A. This already has at least three threads Kev.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but one of the other threads discusses how to update before the actual rollout.
Questions should be asked in Q&A, and this question wasn't really worth starting a new thread. Also, in that article it refers to a link to the article regarding the original two people who 23A was somehow leaked to.
Also, the source code was released for 23B, so 23A isn't the full final OTA.
I don't see any sign of this yet.... One guy does not a "roll out" make. I think Verizon stuttered on this maybe for possible last minute bugs.
An article based on the article referencing the same random guy who got the ota.
Sorry op, but we already have 4 threads with some reference to this.
Someone report please.
bweN diorD said:
An article based on the article referencing the same random guy who got the ota.
Sorry op, but we already have 4 threads with some reference to this.
Someone report please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aaaaaand this is what I said. Kevmans reply:
kevman8396 said:
Yes but one of the other threads discusses how to update before the actual rollout.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kev, sorry man. But the board is getting messy with all the other 23A threads. Its already confirmed 23A isn't the final, so I doubt they will do a full roll with it and a few days later roll out another. I'm on 23A and if commoners got it they would be very upset. Too many notacabe bugs.
Please continue all OTA discussion here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/verizon-lg-g3/general/vs98523a-ota-release-t3038706
No need to for multiple threads discussing the exact same thing.