Hey guys. Just wanted to show something. Did a live chat with a Google Nexus CS Agent. I got this.
((Sorry for the pics, screenshot wasn't working))
(Yes, this is through Google's contact page)
{Contacting LG/(Maybe)Huawei}
[The top got cut off. It reads: I have a Nexus 5X. I have heard about Q-Fuse...]
Uggh, hate this stupid 10 posts thing. Link to imgur: i (dot) imgur (dot) com (/) hVf8VWT (dot) jpg
[[Someone please put the embedded image below...]]
Photo uploaded
Uploading the referenced image for OP
While I'm sure the Q-Fuse is nothing, take what the Google reps say with a grain of salt, there has been a lot of these live chats on reddit and every one say a different thing.
So what they're saying is that unlocking/rooting/romming may break the warranty if purchased from Huawei, but not if it is purchased through google store?
Scyntherei said:
So what they're saying is that unlocking/rooting/romming may break the warranty if purchased from Huawei, but not if it is purchased through google store?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Iam wondering the same here
I purchased mine from Huawei directly (128GB Graphite)...wondering the same now...
Yeah. That kinda bothers me since i ordered from huawei... maybe I should send my nexus back when google gets more in stock. Lol.
Don't take their word on it. Google customer service reps are very inconsistent. There have been several threads on Reddit where they claim otherwise.
what is Q-Fuse ?
Confirmed that unlocking bootloader does not "break QFuse". Still unknown at this point what will happen when custom recovery is flashed tho
Just fyi guys, I've unlocked my boot loader and the qfuse is still unmolested.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
One of the podcasts was saying just because the qfuse is there, doesn't mean it's activated. Could end up being for carrier releases down the line.
Who here came up with the word "Q-Fuse"? It is actually E-Fuse. All Qualcomm SOCs have eFuses. The question is whether or not it is used in Nexus. So far it seems it isn't, but it can change in future ROM releases, as it's more a question of policy than technology (the tech is already in place).
Samsung, for example, does use it in all devices since 2013, since their warranty policy does not cover rooted devices which were un-rooted because of warranty repair.
Old post.
In Europe it´s still possible to claim your warranty, even if you´ve triggered the fuse. It´s a painful process though to argue with Samsung. If you want a developer friendly device, go the Nexus way
rustamabd said:
Who here came up with the word "Q-Fuse"? It is actually E-Fuse. All Qualcomm SOCs have eFuses. The question is whether or not it is used in Nexus. So far it seems it isn't, but it can change in future ROM releases, as it's more a question of policy than technology (the tech is already in place).
Samsung, for example, does use it in all devices since 2013, since their warranty policy does not cover rooted devices which were un-rooted because of warranty repair.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rustamabd said:
Who here came up with the word "Q-Fuse"? It is actually E-Fuse. All Qualcomm SOCs have eFuses. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you obviously dont have a Nexus 6P do you?
Is exactly how its worded on the bootloader! "QFuse "
chaco81 said:
you obviously dont have a Nexus 6P do you?
Is exactly how its worded on the bootloader! "QFuse "
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the correct answer.
What is a QFuse???? Is it anything like "Tripping KNOX" on Samsung?
krolla03 said:
What is a QFuse???? Is it anything like "Tripping KNOX" on Samsung?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's nothing like Knox. It's already tripped when you receive the phone, it's tripped at the factory once engineering technicians are finished with the device, it switches certain partitions to read-only so they can't be messed with by the user.
Related
Just came across a few posts. Apparently rooting doesn't void the warranty anymore!!!! Not sure about the credibility of the information. Ill post the source links at the end of this post.
This is the translated version of info found in the LG Italy- Facebook page (Thanks to Google translator )
"In welcoming the numerous requests received through our official pages on Facebook and forums staffed by us, we inform you that the "rooting" of our smartphone and the subsequent installation of alternative firmware does not void the warranty on the product of 24 months.
This management applies to all Android smartphones sold by LG Electronics Italy. It is understood that LG will not be liable for any malfunctions and / or loss of data due to different firmware from the original remain in force and that the warranty described in the postcard attached to the product."
Hope this doesn't just confine to Italy!
Source: LG Italy (Facebook)
(Note: Before you root your phone, make sure that the warranty is not voided, by contacting your customer care. Im just sharing this information, and wont be responsible for any damage (if) caused to your phone post rooting )
What is the purpose of this new thread? There is already a thread by Ciaox
And according to that thread, it seems there are different stories told at LG customer care centers across the world.
gkarthik16 said:
What is the purpose of this new thread? There is already a thread by Ciaox
And according to that thread, it seems there are different stories told at LG customer care centers across the world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about the duplicate post. Didn't realize there was one already. Thought would share the info, since many still has a doubt on 'Rooting and Warranty'!
Cheers
varungnath said:
Sorry about the duplicate post. Didn't realize there was one already. Thought would share the info, since many still has a doubt on 'Rooting and Warranty'!
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a problem. Appreciate your thought. Cheers
India- Rooting voids Warranty
Received a mail from LG Customer care. Rooting will Void warranty in India!
varungnath said:
Received a mail from LG Customer care. Rooting will Void warranty in India!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh $#iT i m in India !!!
Devil_Dude said:
oh $#iT i m in India !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be it just voids software warranty and not the hardware . who knws!
varungnath said:
May be it just voids software warranty and not the hardware . who knws!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure whether we have separate warranty for h/w and s/w. And do not believe any mail communication from LG support. They are pathetic and generally don't know what they are talking about. Do not worry about rooting. If done properly it is not going to do anything to your device other than enhance it. Even if you make some mistake, it will not destroy your device.
Root and be happy
gkarthik16 said:
Not sure whether we have separate warranty for h/w and s/w. And do not believe any mail communication from LG support. They are pathetic and generally don't know what they are talking about. Do not worry about rooting. If done properly it is not going to do anything to your device other than enhance it. Even if you make some mistake, it will not destroy your device.
Root and be happy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Think i should go ahead and root mine then!
Cheers mate!
You can always unroot, reflash the original firmware, delete other traces and kinds of files related to root, and you can use your warranty
Guys, this thread is CONFIRMED:
I had bought a G4 (Sprint) and rooted it. Don't ask me why or how, but I uninstalled Google Services Framework and caused the "Security Error" Bootloop and have tried everything to restore it. Unfortunately the phone is too new for all the KDZ/TOT restore files to be released.
I contacted LG and asked how much it would cost to restore a bricked G4. The person never gave me a price but said they would cover it under my warranty, so I sent it in 2 weeks ago.
Today, I just got my phone COMPLETELY RESTORED without being charged a dime!!!!
I cannot speak for G4 owners outside the US, but at least LG is stepping up their support game!
varungnath said:
Just came across a few posts. Apparently rooting doesn't void the warranty anymore!!!! Not sure about the credibility of the information. Ill post the source links at the end of this post.
This is the translated version of info found in the LG Italy- Facebook page (Thanks to Google translator )
"In welcoming the numerous requests received through our official pages on Facebook and forums staffed by us, we inform you that the "rooting" of our smartphone and the subsequent installation of alternative firmware does not void the warranty on the product of 24 months.
This management applies to all Android smartphones sold by LG Electronics Italy. It is understood that LG will not be liable for any malfunctions and / or loss of data due to different firmware from the original remain in force and that the warranty described in the postcard attached to the product."
Hope this doesn't just confine to Italy!
Source: LG Italy (Facebook)
(Note: Before you root your phone, make sure that the warranty is not voided, by contacting your customer care. Im just sharing this information, and wont be responsible for any damage (if) caused to your phone post rooting )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bondster45 said:
Guys, this thread is CONFIRMED:
I had bought a G4 (Sprint) and rooted it. Don't ask me why or how, but I uninstalled Google Services Framework and caused the "Security Error" Bootloop and have tried everything to restore it. Unfortunately the phone is too new for all the KDZ/TOT restore files to be released.
I contacted LG and asked how much it would cost to restore a bricked G4. The person never gave me a price but said they would cover it under my warranty, so I sent it in 2 weeks ago.
Today, I just got my phone COMPLETELY RESTORED without being charged a dime!!!!
I cannot speak for G4 owners outside the US, but at least LG is stepping up their support game!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you were rooted? What did you ask them exactly? Just the charge for repairing a brick? No other info?
SAD
I've owned HTC, Samsung and Motorola Android phones and I've had negative experience with two out of 3 those vendors (more on that below). I'm now thinking of getting a newer phone quite soon (well, supposedly Google will be announcing 5 new Google-branded devices this Fall) and the warranty considerations are about the top of my list.
If you've had an experience (wherever positive or negative) with the warranty on your android phone, please post away and let me start the ball rolling. My goal here is to ideally find the manufacturer which would deal with end users directly on the warranty issues and would not shy away from the international warranty. I'll collect responses and then edit this post to reflect the actual warranty statements from the manufacturers rather than my own experiences.
[HTC] I've had a Google Ion device (given at the Google I/O conference) which was also sold known HTC MyTouch. I needed to flash Android 1.5 on it and bricked the phone. HTC spent about a month before they said they didn't have this IMEI in their database and would not offer *any* support (including paid) with that phone. What a bummer, I don't think I'd ever buy the HTC-made Google-branded phone.
[MOTOROLA] Had a problem with the phone not charging (when plugged to a computer) and I panicked and contacted Motorola. They ran the IMEI and suggested I go back to the provider (even tho I'm overseas and wouldn't be back home for a while they refused to accept the phone directly from me). Thankfully the phone charged just fine off the wall outlet, but what if I've had a genuine issue with the phone while overseas? Also, what if this had been a second-hand phone?
.
Thread moved to Q&A due to it being a question. Would advise you to read forum rules and post in correct section.
Failure to comply with forum rules will result in an infraction and/or ban depending on severity of rule break.
the best solutioin for ur problem is the following:
there are two different things
1. the warranty (it is given by the phone manufacture)
2. the service the seller gives to u
i would mention to find a seller wich has a own service station
cus if there are any problems u can bring the phone to them and let them check out whats wrong
I thankfully haven't had to make use of warranty thus far on my android phone (it's an HTC), but I'd say probably if you read some small text somewhere you'd find that the device you were given at Google I/O came without warranty or something like that. I'm sure on purchased devices, HTC will honour the warranty well.
Also, from what I've read, it's almost impossible to completely destroy an HTC phone with software (you should always be able to access bootloader via hardware button combo and from there reflash OS). So an HTC warranty is probably mainly useful for hardware problems.
Another thought worth mentioning is that many manufacturers will not honour warranties if the phone has been rooted or had the bootloader unlocked (at least, if they can tell )
SifJar said:
I thankfully haven't had to make use of warranty thus far on my android phone (it's an HTC), but I'd say probably if you read some small text somewhere you'd find that the device you were given at Google I/O came without warranty or something like that. I'm sure on purchased devices, HTC will honour the warranty well.
Also, from what I've read, it's almost impossible to completely destroy an HTC phone with software (you should always be able to access bootloader via hardware button combo and from there reflash OS). So an HTC warranty is probably mainly useful for hardware problems.
Another thought worth mentioning is that many manufacturers will not honour warranties if the phone has been rooted or had the bootloader unlocked (at least, if they can tell )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was i was thinking too but ive been resently involved into a discussion where a guy bricked his phone in a way he couldnt even get into recovery nor the bootloader
jiffer1991 said:
That was i was thinking too but ive been resently involved into a discussion where a guy bricked his phone in a way he couldnt even get into recovery nor the bootloader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On an HTC? Was he trying to get S-OFF or something? (Perhaps I am misinformed about the brick-ability of HTC phones)
Guys, the thread is about the warranty, not the brickability of the HTC phones.
Regarding the warranty from the seller -- who gives a **** when I'm half a world away from the seller for 4-6 months?
stangri said:
Guys, the thread is about the warranty, not the brickability of the HTC phones.
Regarding the warranty from the seller -- who gives a **** when I'm half a world away from the seller for 4-6 months?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, sorry for going off topic there.
Anyway, I agree you should not have to rely on any warranty from the seller.
jiffer1991 said:
That was i was thinking too but ive been resently involved into a discussion where a guy bricked his phone in a way he couldnt even get into recovery nor the bootloader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont know im just saying this because i want u to be careful
Does anyone know if triangle away works with the galaxy s3 from sprint to reset binary flash counter?
Does not work for US variants. Only international version at this time. The developer stated that he probably won't make one for the US variants because he's fed up with Samsung.
sewhuy said:
Does not work for US variants. Only international version at this time. The developer stated that he probably won't make one for the US variants because he's fed up with Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn. That sucks if true
http://www.chainfire.eu/articles/118/Triangle_Away_vs_Samsung/
thanks for the answer i already voided my warranty not worried though
Dx9 said:
Damn. That sucks if true
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does, mainly because of the fact that manufacturers take advantage of you being rooted. and quoting his blog i couldnt have said it any better myself
"Adam Outler has shown time and again that these devices are perfectly able to be made unbrickable - so any bootloader brick is IMHO Samsung's fault. If Adam Outler can prevent the situation with a soldering iron, the original design is broken.
Regardless, hardware should be under warranty - if I have my device rooted or not. Leaked service center documents show that devices should be checked for root, and if present, deny warranty. (This is not just Samsung, all the major OEMs do this.)"
Additionally, i must add that i cant help but think the easily brickable devices like this one are intentional. Ive been thru many samsung phones and has seen ones such as the GNEX and even legacy ones like the behold 2 that were damn near impossible to brick, why are ones such as these so easy to turn into a paperweight? And this one showin that QHSUSB DLOAD crap when bricked adds to my suspicion because its obvious that at the factory, this will probly be a 2 minute job for the worker to fix. Certain HTc devices have been made unbrickable thanks to that so why couldn't ours?
I think being able to reset the counter may be useful in the future...I hope there will be other alternatives for all the US variants...
I think it's high time that I present myself. I'm not as noob as I can be in the forums. Yes, I don't know Android, since electronics isn't my field of working anymore. I have studied electronics and went for a master in Engineering Physics so I'm not a newbie when it comes to hardware.
Just that I got this (stupid?) 30-year crisis and went for an MD instead.
My foremost field of working has been Unix, but I'm schooled in lower levels and had done both VHDL/Erlang projects and have been really fluent in asm. But that was a LONG time ago when Motorola 68xxx was the ruler (oh, the ****ing best cpu ever made code-wise).
The aversion and stop for asm-coding came with Inter and that was around the 486-time when you had to fiddle with the memory and stuff.
I have kept parts on my knowledge. Did a SOC for a big company with a linux that I pressed in on 128 kb of Rom but I'm not up to date with arm-asm and I can say that the last time I ever coded something was around 1996 since I started with design/capacity planning of hardware and management.
So the time has flown by. I'm a C-coder. Never coded a line of Java in my line. I'm also from Sweden and I don't know where you are from but if you are from USA we have quite some different rules here, especially when it comes to consumer law that can be used for us.
Ok. Enough **** about me.
I called Samsung today and this is a summary of the conversation I had.
I asked them about why the consumers had to use the Knox and how to pass it as a developer.
He could not answer it.
I asked if I trip the flag, why does it forbid me to sideload my own developed applications?
He could not answer it.
I asked how to remove it since as a consumer I had no use for it and this is something that I have not signed up for.
He said that I could send in my phone and have it reflashed to a lower version of the firmware.
I asked for specifications about it and said that knew it's a SE-linux containter (because it is).
That he could confirm.
I asked him what for specifications for the boot loader since it hinders me in my work.
He said that the only thing he could provide was a downgraded one (see above)
I said that I don't want a downgraded one since all use 4.3 and that is the future.
He could not provide that.
I said that maybe this is a deal that Samsung has done with NSA to provide them with information since I don't know what the phone sends out since I'm locked out of the kernel.
He said that he understood that he would feel the same sentiment.
I asked him if consider us who are developing on a low lever as valuable people the brings the phone forward.
He agreed.
I told him that I don't consider tripping the Know-flag to invalidate my warranty since it could be tripped in Kies (as reported here).
He agreed on that and told me that I could then contact the service for a reflash.
I told him that the option left then would be to crack the boot-loader as with the rooting.
He said yes.
Note that this is in Sweden. But the info in any case is interesting since he very well knew about this.
So the info I got. Yes. It's a Se-linux container and it is reflashable. Since it's reflashable we now know that it's not an e-Fuse and can leave that question. Since it's software it's crackable.
Seems high time for me to start to update myself on arm-asm. I got lazy with VHDL/Erlang
Also, this has not been the field of my quite messy life. Going from electronics to computers and Unix towards medicine.
I don't have a J-TAG. What do you guys use? What have you found so far?
Do we have access to the very beginning of the boot strapping?
With that I mean the first asm-lines that the phone do as a start. Is that hardware or is that software?
In this case. Could someone please provide me with that. As I said. I don't know Arm-asm yet, but I'll try to freshen myself. Asm is asm and the last thing I did with Arm was working with a Xlinix that had 2 cores in the die and then a VHDL-part. Really nifty. But that was 10 years ago.
My other problem is time, like you all, since I'm guessing you work full time.
But can someone update me or give me links to white-papers etc on how the phone starts? I guess there is quite little about it. It's not the glorious days where you could get papers on the clock-penalties and how revolutionary it was when you could do an instruction on both the edges of the clock-wave.
Sorry. I type a lot, but I really hate this and yes, people can say what they want. When Ericsson still made phones I had a special firmware that showed a LOT more then what a normal user would get and how chatty the phones are without us knowing. So the option of spreading the "Samsung has made a deal with NSA" WILL scare people whatever you think. I have done "activist" things before and you just have to present it as a theory and get to the point where the rumor will get viral.
I was truly amazed when my complaint against RIIA went viral and the "Govermental institution for internet privacy" got over 5000 complaints in one day. Don't know how that works in other countries but every document that you send here is official and need to be filed. We also have the reverse policy that seems to be a bit unique. Everything is open until it's classified as not public. Not otherwise as it seems in most countries.
Ok, off topic. You have to live with that if you want my help that I'm offering here.
Where are you know in the dissaembly of the boot-loader? SE-linux CAN be cracked but if t's scrabled with hardware it makes it a bit harder.
Ok, enough from me. Want me to start to dig with the Cortex-chip? I know that Qualcom are more then happy to provide white-papers on their chip. Just a matter of cost.
/Paul
Download the open source kernel and build it from source. Use ida for analysis and the qualcomm and Samsung boot procedure documents are around you have to search though.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Surge1223 said:
Download the open source kernel and build it from source. Use ida for analysis and the qualcomm and Samsung boot procedure documents are around you have to search though.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I've seen that some use a modded build-chain for it. Is that just modded for speed or what is modded and where can you get it?
/Paul
Btw, got a i9506 today. Will be interesting. Also got An Note 3 and that has 4.3. Both are "pre-knoxed". Need a good burn-in software before i start to root them. Know any?
I have not noticed this behavior before but although they are connected to a Wifi they still search every 15 s or so for others. I don't recall if my old one did that? My HTC doesn't.
But anyone now how the phone boots-strap? It's too late after having a kernel.
Since it makes it before it loads it, it's not a real SE-kernel because then the custom ones would work without even touching Know, would they. And they trip the flag.
So the check must be done earlier? Besides, are the kernel sources enforcing MAC? I have not set up a build env yet so that's all the questions.
And any good J-Tag that you recommend?
Double post. Don't know how to remove...
You might send it in, if yours is qfused like the ATT model they will have to resign the MDL bootloader with a certificate that has not been invalidated by the qfuse.
If they do that, you can extract it and we will atleast be able to flash back the i9505.
Sent from my i337 MF3 using tapatalk.
TheEgonSpengler said:
You might send it in, if yours is qfused like the ATT model they will have to resign the MDL bootloader with a certificate that has not been invalidated by the qfuse.
If they do that, you can extract it and we will atleast be able to flash back the i9505.
Sent from my i337 MF3 using tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you still think it's actually an e-fuse? If they can "reflash" it as I got the info yesterday that means that the e-fuse is in the prom because how else could they just change it?
I'm still not sure about the fuse thing? Do we have that black on white that it's the case?
Because I think that they have just a small SE-Linux in the bootloader and then they can enforce all the rules they want. Your phone will behave
basically like a jailed Unix-account and the only success in cracking it is to prevent it to load. There is no other way.
I just sent a long and nice mail to Samsung. Will see if they contact me tomorrow.
I basically asked them why it's enforced on us private citizens and if we should start to openly question the motives on Samsung in different
mobile user forums. Because I will. Would be happy if someone would follow suit and help out.
Bad publicity is something that is hard to get rid off. Also, we never got an opt-in/out.
And if they start to get it it WILL scare them. I've done that before but not on this scale.
If need be I will drag them through our Consumer department. They are not so fun if they bite on the case and it just cost me time to write a letter of complaint to them.
"Freedom loving" Sweden will not accept spy-ware on their phones. That is one of the strong thing here. Consumer power and the equivalent for governmental issues.
Well, I'll report tomorrow. Btw, I got my new phone yesterday and it was a I9506.
They don't sell the I9505 anymore and the prel result with plain kernel is that it's about the same speed as Note 3.
absolon_se said:
Do you still think it's actually an e-fuse? If they can "reflash" it as I got the info yesterday that means that the e-fuse is in the prom because how else could they just change it?
I'm still not sure about the fuse thing? Do we have that black on white that it's the case?
Because I think that they have just a small SE-Linux in the bootloader and then they can enforce all the rules they want. Your phone will behave
basically like a jailed Unix-account and the only success in cracking it is to prevent it to load. There is no other way.
I just sent a long and nice mail to Samsung. Will see if they contact me tomorrow.
I basically asked them why it's enforced on us private citizens and if we should start to openly question the motives on Samsung in different
mobile user forums. Because I will. Would be happy if someone would follow suit and help out.
Bad publicity is something that is hard to get rid off. Also, we never got an opt-in/out.
And if they start to get it it WILL scare them. I've done that before but not on this scale.
If need be I will drag them through our Consumer department. They are not so fun if they bite on the case and it just cost me time to write a letter of complaint to them.
"Freedom loving" Sweden will not accept spy-ware on their phones. That is one of the strong thing here. Consumer power and the equivalent for governmental issues.
Well, I'll report tomorrow. Btw, I got my new phone yesterday and it was a I9506.
They don't sell the I9505 anymore and the prel result with plain kernel is that it's about the same speed as Note 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This link should shed some light on the qfuse situation.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=30781353
I believe this is specifically for the i9506 as the qualcomm chip in yours is a different prefix (though they are very similar in construction to my novice eye, the boot process is still a bit magical to me though so grain of salt all that.)
Sent from my i337 MF3 using tapatalk.
TheEgonSpengler said:
This link should shed some light on the qfuse situation.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=30781353
I believe this is specifically for the i9506 as the qualcomm chip in yours is a different prefix (though they are very similar in construction to my novice eye, the boot process is still a bit magical to me though so grain of salt all that.)
Sent from my i337 MF3 using tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually they hotted up the phone quite much: http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=5542&idPhone2=5371
Snapdragon 800, Adreno 330, Krait 400 @ 2,3 Mhz. Antutu places it next to Note 3 so it whops quite much.
Hi everyone!
I just want to share with you guys that I rooted my SGS i9505 with CF root and knox flag was tripped to 0x1.
I flashed the custom rom and i got bootloops and i tired of fixing that issiu. I went to Samsung service center in Dubai and they reflashed the MJ5 stock firmware.
Later when I checked in Download mode Knox flag it was 0x0. I guess I am lucky because I have my warranty back. Sorry for my bad English.
Bishkek said:
Hi everyone!
I just want to share with you guys that I rooted my SGS i9505 with CF root and knox flag was tripped to 0x1.
I flashed the custom rom and i got bootloops and i tired of fixing that issiu. I went to Samsung service center in Dubai and they reflashed the MJ5 stock firmware.
Later when I checked in Download mode Knox flag it was 0x0. I guess I am lucky because I have my warranty back. Sorry for my bad English.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is interesting that they reflashed the stock firmware without negating your warrenty coverage for the tripped knox flag.
The question is were they supposed to do that or did they just screw up?
Thanks for sharing that!
Please follow the next thrilling episode in the Samsung-Zone... --> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=48077682&postcount=1350
And about the reflash. They have offered that to me too if I "happen" to trip the Knox. So e-fuse, no e-fuse. Duck. I don't know what to think anymore.
As someone who's mother accepted the update to MI1 a few days ago, would contacting Samsung be a way to possibly downgrade the baseband?
Where in Samsung would I contact for this?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
kalestew said:
As someone who's mother accepted the update to MI1 a few days ago, would contacting Samsung be a way to possibly downgrade the baseband?
Where in Samsung would I contact for this?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Goodluck! US Samsung told me to kick rocks. (hence why I am posting from a HTC one now.)
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
Bishkek said:
Hi everyone!
I just want to share with you guys that I rooted my SGS i9505 with CF root and knox flag was tripped to 0x1.
I flashed the custom rom and i got bootloops and i tired of fixing that issiu. I went to Samsung service center in Dubai and they reflashed the MJ5 stock firmware.
Later when I checked in Download mode Knox flag it was 0x0. I guess I am lucky because I have my warranty back. Sorry for my bad English.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just a few quesitons to you sir.
did you wait for some minutes or did it take some hour?
was it repaired or motherboard simply replaced?
if they reflash the firmware it looks to me they have a "restoreable" that will be reversible if you flash it, just to ask why didn't you ask him what he did
Hi,
Here's a unique idea.
Let's pass the word to boycott Samsung over the whole KNOX fiasco.
Use social media, ie. twitter, facebook, etc. to pass the word.
Tell everyone you know not to buy a Samsung phone this holiday season.
The only thing that will make companies take notice is if we take action.
1. Just the attempt to downgrade firmware or load unauthorized firmware triggers KNOX in 4.3 and voids your warranty.
2. Now that's not bad enough, because even if you now load a signed piece of firmware KNOX still stays triggered.
3. If my warranty is now void, I should be able to do what I want, but nooooo, my bootloader is still locked and I have no warranty.
So Samsung should fix this. Just trying to do something should not void my warranty, especially since they block the possibility of being able to change the bootloader.
This is not Samsung's device.
Everyone does not need nor want KNOX and those that need it, know it.
The majority of devices are not enterprise, so why are they forcing an enterprise and NSA solution down our throats!
BOYCOTT SAMSUNG!!!
tech_head said:
Hi,
Here's a unique idea.
Let's pass the word to boycott Samsung over the whole KNOX fiasco.
Use social media, ie. twitter, facebook, etc. to pass the word.
Tell everyone you know not to buy a Samsung phone this holiday season.
The only thing that will make companies take notice is if we take action.
1. Just the attempt to downgrade firmware or load unauthorized firmware triggers KNOX in 4.3 and voids your warranty.
2. Now that's not bad enough, because even if you now load a signed piece of firmware KNOX still stays triggered.
3. If my warranty is now void, I should be able to do what I want, but nooooo, my bootloader is still locked and I have no warranty.
So Samsung should fix this. Just trying to do something should not void my warranty, especially since they block the possibility of being able to change the bootloader.
This is not Samsung's device.
Everyone does not need nor want KNOX and those that need it, know it.
The majority of devices are not enterprise, so why are they forcing an enterprise and NSA solution down our throats!
BOYCOTT SAMSUNG!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was going to say a lot of the obvious, but let's just say this is um admirable.
tech_head said:
Hi,
Here's a unique idea.
Let's pass the word to boycott Samsung over the whole KNOX fiasco.
Use social media, ie. twitter, facebook, etc. to pass the word.
Tell everyone you know not to buy a Samsung phone this holiday season.
The only thing that will make companies take notice is if we take action.
1. Just the attempt to downgrade firmware or load unauthorized firmware triggers KNOX in 4.3 and voids your warranty.
2. Now that's not bad enough, because even if you now load a signed piece of firmware KNOX still stays triggered.
3. If my warranty is now void, I should be able to do what I want, but nooooo, my bootloader is still locked and I have no warranty.
So Samsung should fix this. Just trying to do something should not void my warranty, especially since they block the possibility of being able to change the bootloader.
This is not Samsung's device.
Everyone does not need nor want KNOX and those that need it, know it.
The majority of devices are not enterprise, so why are they forcing an enterprise and NSA solution down our throats!
BOYCOTT SAMSUNG!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For your #1, how did you load unauthorized firmware?
I don't understand your #2...what "piece of firmware"?
How do you know it voids your warranty? Did you have issues with the warranty?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
I really doubt something like this would work. The only people on board would be those of us who mod, which make up such a small portion of Samsung's sales, they wouldn't care. The general consumer is where they get their money and said general consumer couldn't care less about Knox.
prshosting.org
Tell your friends and family. Word of mouth is huge.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Samsung sold 213 million phones in 2012.
Two things...
1) Though XDA and all seems huge, only a really really small percentage of cell phone users play around with crap that will effect knox. I doubt a large number of those "don't care" people are going to want join your campaign.
2) There are a lot of great things about Samsung phones and products. It's like people complaining about VZW cost and billing and marketing, but they have great coverage and I'd never switch because someone starts a "boycot Verizon for $$ reasons".
I don't like the S4 lockdown either, but I'd rather have a locked S4 than an unlocked G2.
JeeperDon said:
I don't like the S4 lockdown either, but I'd rather have a locked S4 than an unlocked G2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure I'd agree with this. At the same time o hate Samsung, I'd have a Motorola phone if I wouldn't have had to upgrade when I did. Kind of screwed me.
SirHoover2010 said:
Not sure I'd agree with this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't have to.
JeeperDon said:
You don't have to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea ik. Exactly why I put "at the same time I hate Samsung" so I'm kind of biased
They can make lock downs most of this is to stop forms of piracy in my opinion. I'm new to rooting but I'm from the modding scene. I have no worries do to developers here as I do on game system modding. Give them time nintendo,Sony and Microsoft have done similiar things with updates the push regularly to their gaming consoles and boycoting will not work do to the modding group is a small group that has a small impact they already planned on loosing.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Boycott yourself, this would defeat the purpose of "DEVELOPER" phones...you knew what you were getting into when buying a consumer s4.
When will people think logically? Samsung wants security. They sell the developer phones completely unlocked for US.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Knox is high security put on the phone as a bid to gain military contracts. They only want the most secure phones. Do you think Samsung will stop trying to get that military high $$$ over a few people saying they won't buy anymore? Also add to this many corporate businesses that buy bulk phones and contracts and want a more secure phone for their Exchange and corporate software. XDA users are barely a ripple in that ocean of waves.
you should have bought a developer edition if locked bootloader was a concern.
Sent from my XT1080 using xda app-developers app
not that it matters but i believe a korean family controls 46% of samsung husband wife and 3 kids. just saying.
eklipz3 said:
not that it matters but i believe a korean family controls 46% of samsung husband wife and 3 kids. just saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, so you're going to tell their kids that their daddy is a bad man for locking bootloaders? Tell their kids they won't get Christmas presents if they don't get their parents to unlock bootloaders?
orangechoochoo said:
Okay, so you're going to tell their kids that their daddy is a bad man for locking bootloaders? Tell their kids they won't get Christmas presents if they don't get their parents to unlock bootloaders?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kids don't care. They have the Developers Edition.
orangechoochoo said:
Okay, so you're going to tell their kids that their daddy is a bad man for locking bootloaders? Tell their kids they won't get Christmas presents if they don't get their parents to unlock bootloaders?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry i should have made myself a little more clear about the kids but they are adults as well and are vp's and such of samsung and i think the oldest girl was just promoted to run some part of sammy. and yes i bet there's is not locked.
eklipz3 said:
sorry i should have made myself a little more clear about the kids but they are adults as well and are vp's and such of samsung and i think the oldest girl was just promoted to run some part of sammy. and yes i bet there's is not locked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm...yeah...because the international versions are not locked...neither is Sprint...it is a carrier request to lock bootloaders on Samsung phones, otherwise all phones would be locked. Locked bootloaders and Knox are not the same thing. This thread states it is about Knox. True that Knox in the bootloader prevents you from downgrading the firmware...but does not equal locked. There are many phones with locked bootloaders but no Knox.
Batttie said:
you should have bought a developer edition if locked bootloader was a concern.
Sent from my XT1080 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not just about a locked bootloader.
If that was all, no issues.
KNOX and SE Linux are now baked in from the bootloader up.
No it was not on my phone when I first got my phone and was not detailed before they rolled it out.
Messing with the bootloader in anyway even an attempted downgrade, void your warranty.
Not tampering by using unauthorized software, but just trying to go to an older version of *SIGNED* firmware will void your warranty.
My issue is this, if my warranty is now void, why can't I install any *SIGNED* firmware that came on the phone?