[FIRST BUILD TODAY][KERNEL][SM-G900F][CM13]JellyKernel for International Galaxy S5 - Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development

JellyKernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
After working with one Qualcomm device, I decided to jump on another device, primarily on older one. My intentions are basic and simple - make a stable, fast, light product, which would actually do wonders with quality modifications.​
Some notes, why this kernel will be exclusive:
- It's going to be compiled using Krait optimized Linaro toolchain (from past experience, this one has the best performance/battery ratio)
- MSM8974 specific optimization flags, kernel cleaning
- Kernel version bump to 3.4.11
- No major additions to it, like OC, UV and etc. I want to keep this kernel as barebone as possible.
- Anykernel method, of course.
- Sources will be on my github, of course, when I manage to compile a first kernel build.
Link to my github: https://github.com/airidosas252/android_kernel_samsung_klte
First kernel build will appear today. It will be close to stock CM13 kernel with some additional magic for now. Better to start from start updates rather from radical changes, which might decrease it's stability.

Nice! Add and fast charge .

vd69 said:
Nice! Add and fast charge .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure thing, sorry for the hold up, had a pretty difficult week, so kernel builds went on hold.

@airidosas252
Nice to see new kernel here
Good luck with this project.

No download Link ?
Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk

Related

Who will push the limits?

With the introduction of the new Kernel for our phones, who is planning to push the limits of our processors and make it stable at 1720 mhz????
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
cfaberlle said:
With the introduction of a new Kernel for our phones, who is planning to push the limits of our processors and make it stable at 1720 mhz????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ported illusion rom in the development section allows you to overclock to 1720mhz.
Sent from my AT100 using Tapatalk
That's the Kernel I'm talking about and the one that I'm currently using.
My question was, who will attempt to make their phone stable above 1600mhz...
I've been playing with voltage control all day and the most I can set it to is 1600mhz stable.
As soon as I go higher my phone freezes or reboots. Maybe my phone is not capable of this but I will keep trying.
anyway to flash that kernel on top of SHOstock?
I'm curious, but would you mind sharing your voltages, my phone freezes up and reboot on occasion with the ones I'm trying
K Rich said:
anyway to flash that kernel on top of SHOstock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The original thread in the I9100 forums has a link with the kernel for the I777
Alucardis666 said:
I'm curious, but would you mind sharing your voltages, my phone freezes up and reboot on occasion with the ones I'm trying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are my settings
My phone likes to be OVed to remain stable. Every phone is different so you will have to find what works for you.
thank you!

[Q] [KERNEL DEVELOPMENT] Kernel reports only 249MB RAM instead 289MB

Hello.
So, I'm creating custom kernel based on Rafael.Baugis source. After some time of adding additions my kernel reports only 249MB of RAM when after jumping to Rafael kernel it reports 289MB again.
Screenshot:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Compiled kernel with problem in attachment (I'm using it to daily use, so don't worry about **** outs [CM7 beta, RFS not tested, EXT4 100% ok]).
There is kernel source:
https://github.com/devloz/Ace-I-Kernel
Thanks very much.
PS: I'll commit after reboot to Ubuntu (10-15 minutes delay) [already commited].
PSS: Even on stock I've CyanogenMod-like upper screen glitch when scrolling horizontally (Related to modded graphics driver).
Could you write properly how to install? And what download for cm7?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
If testing compiled:
- Download EXT4, RFS, or CM7.
- Download modules.
- Install EDITION.
- Install modules.
If testing source:
- Clone git or examine my last commit on GitHub (this about issue [some hours ago[)
- Tell me what is wrong.
NOTE:
- CM7 still have not working things ie. bluetooth (wifi works well and upper screen glitch is more upper so dont disturbing as earlier).
- RFS never tested to boot (Will boot to recovery of course but not sure if will mount rfs partitions on boot).
- EXT4 will boot 100% on STOCK based ROMS (have better 3D).
++ REMEMBER it's question, not release.
Is this project stopped? seemed promising

[Q] How can I tell what toolchain a ROM was compiled with?

I've been building CM10.2 for the past month or two and I know how to compile a kernel with a custom toolchain through a BoardConfig flag.
Normally, you can view kernel info, such as the toolchain version used, by opening /proc/version. I was wondering, is there a similar file that I could open to see what toolchain was used to compile the actual ROM?
I followed a guide somewhere to change the toolchain that is used to compile the ROM and I've compiled the ROM itself with a Linaro 4.7 toolchain. Now, I'm not sure if it actually compiled using the Linaro toolchain (I think it may have been built with the regular toolchain used for CM) so I was wondering if there was a way to see (on the device) what toolchain was used for the ROM.
I'd appreciate if someone would help me out here. I don't think it's too much to ask of. Thanks,
- Codename13
@Codename13
CPU Spy shows compiler version when you scroll down to Kernel info.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mardon said:
@Codename13
CPU Spy shows compiler version when you scroll down to Kernel info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, that's just the info for the kernel. What I need is the ROM compilation info, which seems impossible to get.
The rom should be compiled with same compiler as the kernel if its the roms inbuild kernel
Gesendet von meinem LT18i mit Tapatalk

[Request/Poll] KDE Plasma-Mobile ROM

With this thread, I like to give my (and maybe your) request and wish
for KDE plasma-mobile ROM, for our device!
I'm making this poll, to make visible if there's interest in this ROM. Means,
maybe find a willing dev to code it.
Note: This ROM is still new for phones, but KDE is in strong
development
About:
For those who tried Linux's desktop enviroment KDE,
they will probably know how awesome KDE is.
When I first read about it, I was truly fascinated (https://www.xda-developers.com/plasma-mobile-is-a-fully-open-source-smartphone-os-from-kde-e-v/)
You may check out their site, if you're curious: https://plasma-mobile.org/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
- Would love to use it, KDE is awesome -
PS: I am no dev, and I know this will probably first be possible, when kernel sources are released next month.
Yes we need this rom
still need the official kernel from Xiaomi though
toji12 said:
still need the official kernel from Xiaomi though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I was mentioning in my last sentence
kernel source is released today
Seems this one is fresh new os,and got lots of potential, so i am Waiting for good news...
Did someone start working on it yet?
I would love to have this!
Yea this OS seems very interesting, would be cool if someone would build it
Yeah I heard about this OS before. Can anyone port this please

ElementalX Kernel for Redmi Note 4X?

So that the kernel sources are released, is it possible to get official ElementalX kernel for this device?
tom_riddler said:
So that the kernel sources are released, is it possible to get official ElementalX kernel for this device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes Eventually i guess when the devs are free and they feel like
tom_riddler said:
So that the kernel sources are released, is it possible to get official ElementalX kernel for this device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Who knows?
It's depends upon the dev flar2.
Just happy with what you got atm.
@flar2 please consider this device...
tom_riddler said:
@flar2 please consider this device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he needs the device first for that.
AutumQueen92 said:
I think he needs the device first for that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Building won't require a device. Testing would. And when it comes to testing, i think there are plenty of people who are willing to help, including me.
The reason why I'm so eager for an ElementalX kernel is, this device has a cpu which consumes less power and​ produces less heat while providing great performance. It's a perfect cpu to overclock.

Categories

Resources