I am surprised that you missed that or maybe I missed it here
I dirtyflashed it over a CM13 and it seems to work
testing now
here are the roms/links
on german x820 forum its clear #1
http://download.mokeedev.com/?device=le_x2
dont forget its without gapps so flash add them when you like google stuff
Se didnt miss it but thanks anyway. That ROM was deleted from xda due to the fact that some users that dont do anything else but complaining, and attacking the dev. The dev from mokee hás informed that hes not posting anymore ROMs in xda. Nougat included
What is the dif btw release n nightlies
nosidefcp said:
Se didnt miss it but thanks anyway. That ROM was deleted from xda due to the fact that some users that dont do anything else but complaining, and attacking the dev. The dev from mokee hás informed that hes not posting anymore ROMs in xda. Nougat included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello. You forgot to tell the full truth. The case is the dev was asked to release sources and he refused.
Regards Filozof71
Sent from my Le X820 using Tapatalk
Filozof71 said:
Hello. You forgot to tell the full truth. The case is the dev was asked to release sourced and he denied.
Regards Filozof71
Sent from my Le X820 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats not true. He said he wasnt releasing the source in that day. Three por four days later he released here the source code
nosidefcp said:
Thats not true. He said he wasnt releasing the source in that day. Three por four days later he released here the source code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Incorrect. People were asking for the Device Tree used to build Mokee, which wasn't and still hasn't been provided. XDA isn't a place for you to download roms, it's a developer community. Pretty sure the device tree would have been converted from one that was available (Probably OP3) and not sharing it is disrespectful to every developer who has worked on it previously.
https://github.com/MoKee/android_device_letv_le_x2 is empty.
mikeysteele said:
Incorrect. People were asking for the Device Tree used to build Mokee, which wasn't and still hasn't been provided. XDA isn't a place for you to download roms, it's a developer community. Pretty sure the device tree would have been converted from one that was available (Probably OP3) and not sharing it is disrespectful to every developer who has worked on it previously.
https://github.com/MoKee/android_device_letv_le_x2 is empty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which rule say MUST share device tree?you can ask leeco share official device tree too.TRY HARDER
ffboy2009 said:
which rule say MUST share device tree?you can ask leeco share official device tree too.TRY HARDER
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who's talking about rules? This is a community and communities have standards. You're free to do whatever you like but expect people to be unhappy if you disrespect the community.
ffboy2009 said:
which rule say MUST share device tree?you can ask leeco share official device tree too.TRY HARDER
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all: THANKS for your ROMs. Second: i would really consider publishing the device tree, because there might be a few others who would like to contribute.
Although the Max 2 is a rather "specific" smartphone, which - outside of India and China - nobody really considers buying.
ffboy2009 said:
which rule say MUST share device tree?you can ask leeco share official device tree too.TRY HARDER
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Open Source rule and spirit. We share our knowledge and we don't hide it.
https://github.com/deadman96385/android_device_leeco_x2
https://github.com/AndroPlus-org/android_device_leeco_x2?files=1
I know is difficult to you to understand this. There must be a reason why you don't want to provide your sources.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3494247
ffboy doesn't own anybody anything. He releases his ROM's for free, he doesn't force you to use them. Many rom developers don't release their source code/device trees, one reason is that people could take there hard work getting everything to work and use to build their own ROM's and get donations from them without doing any hard work themselves. Even my grandma can build a ROM when eveyrthing is handed to her. One example is the very resepected developer arter97 who didn't release cyanogenmod device trees for s6 for a while when he was developing for s6. Get off ffboy's case, he is a developer and doesn't deserve this, if there was a downvote in xda I would downvote the haters. You've already been warned by the mods yet you still pour hate on to the dev.
Edit: I agree with ffboy we should continue petitioning LeEco for device trees.
@whymoo
I am not arter97, i don't care what he does and i don't accept donations.
ffboy released his rom under mokee s name who they aclame to be "open source". Also i except to see the whole source and not part of it.
If ffboy doesn't like this he could publice his rom to a hoster like "mega"
ffboy and not me already copied code and signed the same code as his own and don't gave proper credit.
We are a big community and we help each other. We share our knowledge and don't hide it. I and other people don't like to reinvend the wheel again. This is a waste of precius time who lot of us they don't have. Yes! we can contribute, merge bugs and maybe compile other roms and yes, ffboy must accept, that maybe me or others wanna use his device tree or some other code. BUT we don't forget to give credits.
Btw i don't be warned and i don't see a reason why should be.
It's CM or stock based?
ir work?
monleylord said:
@whymoo
I am not arter97, i don't care what he does and i don't accept donations.
ffboy released his rom under mokee s name who they aclame to be "open source". Also i except to see the whole source and not part of it.
If ffboy doesn't like this he could publice his rom to a hoster like "mega"
ffboy and not me already copied code and signed the same code as his own and don't gave proper credit.
We are a big community and we help each other. We share our knowledge and don't hide it. I and other people don't like to reinvend the wheel again. This is a waste of precius time who lot of us they don't have. Yes! we can contribute, merge bugs and maybe compile other roms and yes, ffboy must accept, that maybe me or others wanna use his device tree or some other code. BUT we don't forget to give credits.
Btw i don't be warned and i don't see a reason why should be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first i opensourced kernel soucre as GPL requirement,but device tree was not GPL and you do not have the right to force me do things i dont like.
2nd i know i made mistakes on kernel source for commit authorship brcause i am not good at git tools but i have already corrected them.
i dont care you like me and my rom or not
i have released all source of mi max on my github
the only reason i dont release max2 device tree is,
Some people here is just do nothing but PUSHING AND ATTACKING me because they want my device tree to build there roms to gain Respect and donations i think.they are so rude and ridiculous
when i said "No plan to release kernel source RECENTLY" and released a few days later,they don't care and start attacking and pushing
i also dont warned by forum moderatoer by not released device tree
So ban me out of this forum if you can
ffboy2009 said:
first i opensourced kernel soucre as GPL requirement,but device tree was not GPL and you do not have the right to force me do things i dont like.
2nd i know i made mistakes on kernel source for commit authorship brcause i am not good at git tools but i have already corrected them.
i dont care you like me and my rom or not
i have released all source of mi max on my github
the only reason i dont release max2 device tree is,
Some people here is just do nothing but PUSHING AND ATTACKING me because they want my device tree to build there roms to gain Respect and donations i think.they are so rude and ridiculous
when i said "No plan to release kernel source RECENTLY" and released a few days later,they don't care and start attacking and pushing
i also dont warned by forum moderatoer by not released device tree
So ban me out of this forum if you can
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't care if you like ne or not either. I gave you also a like. I don't care either to gain Respect or earn money through donations.
You are the only one here who try to gain respect or donations but your behavior shows me clearly that you are reacting like a little defiant child who felt driven into a corner.
I made a Pointment about you and you have to accept it.
monleylord said:
I don't care if you like ne or not either. I don't care either to gain Respect or earn money through donations. You are the only one here who try to gain respect or donations but your behavior shows me clearly that you are rect like a child. I made a Pointment about you and you have to accept it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd be interested in the device tree so I could play around building with some custom toolchains. All my phones run ROM's I've compiled myself but I've never shared them with anybody here as they aren't my work.
mikeysteele said:
I'd be interested in the device tree so I could play around building with some custom toolchains. All my phones run ROM's I've compiled myself but I've never shared them with anybody here as they aren't my work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will become ridiculous be smart and open with everybody we talk about a phone don't forget this please
sdevaux said:
This will become ridiculous be smart and open with everybody we talk about a phone don't forget this please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you misunderstand. Building ROMs with custom toolchains and then posting them here would be passing off the work of others as my own, which is not on. I'm not making any source code changes.
mikeysteele said:
I think you misunderstand. Building ROMs with custom toolchains and then posting them here would be passing off the work of others as my own, which is not on. I'm not making any source code changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand it's just that everyone should be open with others it would allow us to move forward the rom development for this model that's just my opinion
Related
@all the coders
The community has people with very good coding skills (we know them and they know them each-other), so why you(we) do not concentrate your(our) skills and work on one big open-source app. The synergetic (network) effects would make it possible to build and later host a stable and all included community-based-open-source-group-coded app!
We have so many pseudo-proprietary based tools:
ROM-Kitchen, Hermes ROM Koch, nbhextract, et cetera...
Is think the best would be, to set up something like an open-source-project. - we can host the codesnippets on a subversion or cvs directory or something else to manage the distributed progress.
The efforts would be much bigger and come much faster, that should be clear for everybody.
So please let me know and i will set up such a directory!
Maybe pof can set up a poll for this - so we can get a democracy-based decision!
AFAIK this would be the first joined forces XDA-Developers development and i think it is realy the time for it!
And what are you waiting for ? Start development of this one big open-source app by yourself right now. And others would join if they find it interesting.
Des said:
And what are you waiting for ? Start development of this one big open-source app by yourself right now. And others would join if they find it interesting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I created a svn-repository,
please PM me with your email-adress to send you the account information!
I've meant start development not creating svn res
Des said:
I've meant start development not creating svn res
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but at first my programming skills are not as good as your skills are and at second why i should start a new app since we have a lot of lines already?
but as far as is see you won´t join, will you?
apokryphus said:
why i should start
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why others should ?
but as far as is see you won´t join, will you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
join to what ?
Des said:
why others should ?
join to what ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Others started already, so they just have to put their code in there and others can modify it.
Join the svn...
BTW: You know what a svn is, don´t you?
apokryphus said:
they just have to put their code in there and others can modify it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is sourceforge for it. And there was cvs rep on xda-developers. If you going to host another - that's good. But how it relates to starting of development of "a stable and all included community-based-open-source-group-coded app" ?
Join the svn...
BTW: You know what a svn is, don´t you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
svn is in the first place code hosted there. No code == nothing to join.
Well, e.g. dutty could host his code in there, if he wants; olipro could host his code in there, if he wants; like all the others.
that would be good start.
Then merge the code and bring up new features... like guis (i would do that e.g.)
And yes, i can not host any code because i did not wrote something and i do not want to decompile the versions we have, because of ip, the developer should agree with it first.
besides this is just an idea, but reading your posts it seems this idea is not very welcome.
i wrote something like this to a mod here 2 weeks ago, did not got an answer, so at all i think it could really be a bad idea - however maybe some others will say somthing about it.
apokryphus said:
besides this is just an idea, but reading your posts it seems this idea is not very welcome.
i wrote something like this to a mod here 2 weeks ago, did not got an answer, so at all i think it could really be a bad idea - however maybe some others will say somthing about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally think it's a great idea! It's just too bad I'm not a developer; I wish I could help!
But yes, I believe that if everyone here worked together on a project, the results could be wonderful. I guess that doesn't mean much since I don't have the skills needed to contribute, but it still sounds ideal.
Des I Think Apokryphus Is Main Aim Is An Open Source ROM Kitchen.
With The Issue That ahok_hk Had With Olipro About Him Releasing A Ported Version Of His Software, I Think He Sees The Coders Working Against Each Other (Or At Least Being Rivals). And Wants Everyone To Play Nice To Create One Kitchen That Is Fast And Simple. Which Means That It Has To Be Open Source So Everyone Can Make Reccomendations On How To Update The Software.
Cheers
mousey_ said:
Des I Think Apokryphus Is Main Aim Is An Open Source ROM Kitchen.
With The Issue That ahok_hk Had With Olipro About Him Releasing A Ported Version Of His Software, I Think He Sees The Coders Working Against Each Other (Or At Least Being Rivals). And Wants Everyone To Play Nice To Create One Kitchen That Is Fast And Simple. Which Means That It Has To Be Open Source So Everyone Can Make Reccomendations On How To Update The Software.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but not only for recommendation also for modifying the software, thats the main goal - joined people can add their own lines of code to provide the stability or usability for instance.
i hope i did not got you wrong, what means that i think you meant with update not modifying. but in case of that is the meaning i totaly agree with your opinion.
sorry but i am not a native speaker and sometimes i have got some problem with the meaning of the translations.
see quine, in word and object, chapter 2 about the indeterminacy of translation.
mousey_ said:
Des I Think Apokryphus Is Main Aim Is An Open Source ROM Kitchen.
With The Issue That ahok_hk Had With Olipro About Him Releasing A Ported Version Of His Software, I Think He Sees The Coders Working Against Each Other (Or At Least Being Rivals). And Wants Everyone To Play Nice To Create One Kitchen That Is Fast And Simple. Which Means That It Has To Be Open Source So Everyone Can Make Reccomendations On How To Update The Software.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must stress that everyone has their rights for their own intellectual property because the have created them using many many hours of effort. And I was not saying that I am not going to release the code. But just not right now coz it is still in beta and many fixes/function will be added. And there is not such "The Coders Working Against Each Other" in my mine at all. Coders should "respect" each other.
For the case of Olipro, he not only stole and released the code "without my prior agreement", but still releasing it after I suggested him to just put those code in his kitchen.
On the other hand, dutty is good. Why? because he also wanted to use the souce code of aChef, and he did ask me before he wants to put it in his kitchen.
BTW, originally I have successfully added many new functions to aChef that no one has done/thought before, but I see no point to release them or to continue my effort now.
Anyway every one has their own thoughts about intellectual proterty. And I am not going to discuss here anymore. Good luck and Good bye to all.
it's a port... it's not your code, you didn't license your code, and you did not say anywhere that anyone was forbidden from creating a derivative work, I made it to benefit the community, if you want to let ego get in the way, that's your problem buddy, not mine.
while I reconize the merrits of open source, I think people should respect (an appreciate) the hard work that people have done. The people in this forum have made some wonderful software, provided it to us free of charge. If they want to put their hard work out there in an open source form, that's great, if not, that's also great - it should be their choice with no pressure.) I've not even seen anybody complain about their software being incorperated into other programs - they've just asked that you respect their IP which in my opinion is perfectly fair.
If you'd like something put into opensource, write a nice letter suggesting it with no pressure, and then leave it to the developer. If they want to they will, if not, simply thank them for their hard work an appreciate the product they've provided for you. If you push people who don't want to release it for whatever their reason, you'll alienate them and they'll cease development which would be a detrament to everybody!
<steps down off soapbox>Sorry for my pointless ramblings - please, continue ignoring me!
ahlok_hk said:
BTW, originally I have successfully added many new functions to aChef that no one has done/thought before, but I see no point to release them or to continue my effort now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*cough* VAPOURWARE *cough*
we all appreciate your effort including me... but if diddums wants to throw a tantrum the feel free
Hello all
I have spent much time recently attempting to modify the zImage included with the Fascinate to include a working recovery image for us to use. However without source code this an extremely difficult (if not possible) goal to achieve.
I am requesting that anyone who owns this device please request the kernel source code from Samsung, so that we may be able to fully utilize our devices. Even if you do not know anything about coding or have any personal use for this source code, it is your right to request it as an owner of the device, and this code will help us all immensely once it is in the right hands.
Requests for source code can be filed on Samsung's website at : opensource . samsung.com/ (remove the extra spaces, apparently I can't post links yet)
Click on the mail icon at the top to submit your request.
Thank you for your assistance.
Requesting right now. Thanks for what your doing! Any updates since last night?
i just finished sending one in
jt1134 said:
Hello all
I have spent much time recently attempting to modify the zImage included with the Fascinate to include a working recovery image for us to use. However without source code this an extremely difficult (if not possible) goal to achieve.
I am requesting that anyone who owns this device please request the kernel source code from Samsung, so that we may be able to fully utilize our devices. Even if you do not know anything about coding or have any personal use for this source code, it is your right to request it as an owner of the device, and this code will help us all immensely once it is in the right hands.
Requests for source code can be filed on Samsung's website at : opensource . samsung.com/ (remove the extra spaces, apparently I can't post links yet)
Click on the mail icon at the top to submit your request.
Thank you for your assistance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You just want everything handed to you, don't you? Quit being so lazy and do some actual work.
But seriously everyone, please take the time to fill out the request. The sooner we get the source, the quicker we'll see some ROMs.
namebrandon said:
You just want everything handed to you, don't you? Quit being so lazy and do some actual work.
But seriously everyone, please take the time to fill out the request. The sooner we get the source, the quicker we'll see some ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This guy again, huh
Seriously, thank you to anyone who fills out the request. Remember, as an owner of the device it is your right to have access to the kernel source code, and it takes less than 2 minutes to fill out the request form. Tell your friends!
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/reception_main.do?method=inquiryView
There's the direct url for the lazy.
Thanks for direct link. Filled one out through my phone. Made it sound pretty formal lol. Let's hope we get the ball rolling soon, starting to miss all the active development on the older phones.
Submitted a request.
frostman89 said:
Thanks for direct link. Filled one out through my phone. Made it sound pretty formal lol. Let's hope we get the ball rolling soon, starting to miss all the active development on the older phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once we get source we will be able to get a working recovery, then the floodgates will be open. My personal mission is to get AOSP/CM on the phone immediately after that happens, can't stand the TouchWiz and I intend to destroy it!!
Submitted a request. Only way I'll be buying this phone is if I can eliminate all Verizon/Samsung UI/apps. Even a vanilla ROM will do over the TouchWiz crap.
I am a little confused. What source code are you requesting?
If you go to h**p://opensource.samsung.com/, click on 'Mobile' at the top, then Ctrl-F for "i9000", you can find (what looks like) a zip containing both the kernel image and files you can plop in an aosp tree in order to build roms for the Galaxy S.
Maybe you guys are talking about source specifically for Fascinate?
partner55583777 said:
I am a little confused. What source code are you requesting?
If you go to h**p://opensource.samsung.com/, click on 'Mobile' at the top, then Ctrl-F for "i9000", you can find (what looks like) a zip containing both the kernel image and files you can plop in an aosp tree in order to build roms for the Galaxy S.
Maybe you guys are talking about source specifically for Fascinate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, we are requesting the source for the fascinate. As the i9000 is a completely different device, and we have the sch-i500
fallingup said:
Yes, we are requesting the source for the fascinate. As the i9000 is a completely different device, and we have the sch-i500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, thanks. That clears it up.
So I guess Samsung is currently in violation of the GPL, then? (And probably other licenses).
partner55583777 said:
Okay, thanks. That clears it up.
So I guess Samsung is currently in violation of the GPL, then? (And probably other licenses).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i am sure they will release the source, its just taking them longer than i would like. They released the source for the Epic about 3 days after the hardware was released, and we are at about a week now.
Yeah, they'll post the code soon, they're just taking their sweet time about it.
Source code released! Thanks guys!
jt1134 said:
Source code released! Thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and source code fail!
Is the source code on opensource.samsung.com still the wrong one?
ludeboy said:
Is the source code on opensource.samsung.com still the wrong one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure yet. We've confirmed they've had at least two different files for download since last night. The original one wasn't' working. I'm at work, so can't tell you much about the second (latest) one.
It works but it does not ring. You can use it to test roms if a (developer) needs one. PM me.
send it to the CyanogenMod dev's so we can get the eris on the supported devices list =D
Yeah, I thought one of the things we needed for official support was to send them a phone. Not that the current ports aren't great(tazz's and workshed's) but official support may help resolve some of the minor bugs that are encountered.
Guys, they don't need a phone. What they want is someone to submit a working vendor tree for the Eris on github, following the cm rules. But then that individual has to 'maintain' the tree and become part of the official cm team.
I would, but can't really commit to being the maintainer right now.
I just wanted to up date. The phone speaker phone does not work but he head set does.
workshed said:
Guys, they don't need a phone. What they want is someone to submit a working vendor tree for the Eris on github, following the cm rules. But then that individual has to 'maintain' the tree and become part of the official cm team.
I would, but can't really commit to being the maintainer right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is a vendor tree?
Sent from my GSBv1.9 ERIS using XDA Premium App
wildstang83 said:
What is a vendor tree?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the source code is not device specific, but since each device is different... There has to be some code that only applies to that particular device. That's the vendor tree. It's basically some build files that grab the correct drivers, libs, and other files for that specific device. Officially supported devices have their trees integrated into the main CM source, so that the device can be selected at build time.
We do the same thing with the Eris, except the tree is pulled in from a separate repo before building.
dwrecording said:
I just wanted to up date. The phone speaker phone does not work but he head set does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If a dev doesn't want it, I would sell it on eBay if you're not up to buying a speaker to replace it yourself. Someone will buy it. Probably make at least $40-$60 or more.
Sent a PM like 6 hours ago lol. Also, since I decided to be a retard and take my phone swimming with me in the Pacific ahaha. I could really use this !
EDIT: I'm kind of a dev. I do have 2 ROMs out...............
roirraW "edor" ehT said:
If a dev doesn't want it, I would sell it on eBay if you're not up to buying a speaker to replace it yourself. Someone will buy it. Probably make at least $40-$60 or more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you could try:
http://swappa.com/
says an eris goes for 90-120$
i dont know how "hot" they are selling but always worth a shot
Seriously, no response to my pm or multiple posts ? Ok.
spc_hicks09 said:
Seriously, no response to my pm or multiple posts ? Ok.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hate lack of communication. If he changed his mind he should just tell you. No offense to the OP if I'm out of line.
What you ppl think about this:
"I do NOT give permissions to anyone to use anything from this ROM in your own ROM."
Do this means I cannot use that roms kernel which he take from other ROM??? Or he mean that he build that kernel or core stuff himself?
gintsgints said:
What you ppl think about this:
"I do NOT give permissions to anyone to use anything from this ROM in your own ROM."
Do this means I cannot use that roms kernel which he take from other ROM??? Or he mean that he build that kernel or core stuff himself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did you see this? link?
gintsgints said:
What you ppl think about this:
"I do NOT give permissions to anyone to use anything from this ROM in your own ROM."
Do this means I cannot use that roms kernel which he take from other ROM??? Or he mean that he build that kernel or core stuff himself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you are going to release a rom on xda and going to use parts of someone else's rom then he does not give you permission for that. if you are going to use parts of someone else's rom but it is for your own pleasure you can go ahead and do so if you want. hope that makes it clearer
Stifler69 is right. As long as it's home use only and you don't claim its your own work and promptly publish it you should be fine.
Dc
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
A its a question ,
B i use roms and kernels from many sources in my phone but i am not posting so its not a problem .
C if its your own phone and not posted who knows what you use
D you can not then moan or ask for specific rom help if you have changed the original components .
I use xx rom but a different kernel own CSC and ICS modem .
jje
i know where that is from. it's fine as long as you don't publish what you took and claim it as your own.
i can understand why he is being this way. he spent time and effort trying to bring all of those features to his rom and people just take them, put them in their roms and don't even bother giving him credits. i even read once a foreign forum mod copied his whole rom and just renamed it then published it as his. you can imagine what he felt. yet he still let them go. then he got reported (reason unclear) by a rom dev who was using his work and got banned. that's why he's now doing what he's doing.
anyway, i'm sure you can find out more details from the android dev forum if you look hard enough.
Personal use is fine, but you can't go re-posting it, or trying to sell it for donations etc...
Basically, it's common courtesy, that person is simply saying they don't want people kanging them.
Yes. I can understund him. I can understund about his artwork or somthin. But still...
Why I cannot reuse some parts... probably open source ones? He does not do that? Where is that line when Open source components becomes his property?
PS. I have worked on a lot open source projects... and I will never ask for credits. It's fine if you get some.
PSPS. Do he recognise how much open source projects put they work on making that rom to work at all?
I understand your point, but that's the rules of XDA (rule #12). And those we accept and agree when joining the forum.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Well the linux kernel used by all ROMs is GPLv2 licenced, so no one has any right to say that anyone else cannot reuse it, and they have a responsibility to release their source code if they modify it.
As for the rest of the ROM, asking people not to use its contents seems a bit unreasonable and disingenuous to me. All the ROMs people release here are the culmination of all the work others have done, and include lots of stuff that other people have shared freely.
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a common way on this forum to express support for the development of a specific custom ROM for a phone? Is there a commonly accepted way to do this? (Came here to see if I could +1 a LineageOs thread for the Zenfone 9)
Rik
bump
rainyskye said:
bump
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha is this a +1 of my wish to be able to give a +1 ?
Hey mate,
I was thinking to contact developers and pay them to build lineage OS and make it official!
Or the other alternative is Learn how to build it and submit it for review on LOS website..
If you have any suggestions?
cool, no idea how to go about that, but I would be happy to contribute as well. I'm sure others would be too - I am on a forum where there are multiple threads dedicated to finding a good small deGoogled phone (community.e.foundation). There must be a place where people can put up amounts for a development like this, right? Sort of like a Kickstarter for a bit of development? I will ask on the other forum too
Rik44444 said:
cool, no idea how to go about that, but I would be happy to contribute as well. I'm sure others would be too - I am on a forum where there are multiple threads dedicated to finding a good small deGoogled phone (community.e.foundation). There must be a place where people can put up amounts for a development like this, right? Sort of like a Kickstarter for a bit of development? I will ask on the other forum too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem with LineageOS is that when there is no more maintainer for a specific model the phone just goes to rubbish, no more security patch... same for the other custom rom... eOS depends on LOS repositories and even if lineage stop supporting a specific device eOS will keep updating their all supported devices... That's why I really like eOS. It doesn't matter if some features are unavailable... a phone is supposed to be used for call, text. Nowadays, everything seems to be sophisticated however it doesn't need to be... I'll start asking some recognised developers if they are willing to work on a LOS build for the zf9 for some money participation... maybe start a crowdfunding of an alternative without fraud!!
Bump
Hi bro,
Sorry got no time at the moment I ended up using a one plus 6 with eOS... I haven't started anything yet. I might need some help to organise something about crowdfunding..
Good luck and let us know if you have some ideas. Thank's