Have android...but should I get windows? - Lenovo Yoga Book Guides, News, & Discussion

I got the android version of this device and it is amazing.
I am a writer as a secondary career...novels, and now wonder if u should have gotten the windows version?

I did some translation work on my yogabook android and I personally do not see any reason for getting clunky windows for editorial work when there are so many writing apps avail for android.

Related

Emulating x10 camera and app from rom 2.1 in 2.2/2.3

Hi Developers
I thought I would share an idea I had with the developers on this forum in regards to the issue with the x10 camera not functioning on 2.2 or 2.3 roms. I am an experienced developer, but honestly am not very familiar with the android platform to be able to attempt this idea. Don't shoot me down, this is just an idea but it may be worth investigating.
I understand that there are issues in porting items such as the camera over from a 2.1 rom over to 2.2 or 2.3 due to the change in the android camera api. Instead of rewriting drivers, etc, it may worth investigating or attempting the method I am about to mention.
I have noticed that there have been alot of emulators written to play games on the android, which emulate neogeo, psx, etc. Why dont we emulate aspects of the 2.1 run which can be run in 2.2 or 2.3?
For example, create an app which will emulate the camera from 2.1 rom by emulating the camera api's from 2.1. When you load up your phone and run the 'camera' app, it would actually emulate the camera app from 2.1 within the 2.2/2.3 rom by using the required 2.1 camera api's? I believe this would be the best way of resolving the issue. Plus, this app which emulates the camera from 2.1 would actually just be an app which can be easily installed to work on 2.2, 2.3, or any other future rom releases....
Developers, let me know what your thoughts are on this. If this works, we may be able to always use native features from the x10 already written and developed for the 2.1 rom.
neomira
Thats a very good idea mate,make an 2.1 emulator for 2.3 and up. But mate thats not the problem,its not the camera app itself thats not working,its the inside libs(drivers so to say) that were written in 2.1 (Lets say Windows 98) language and now to switch them to 2.2/2.3 (Windows 7 so to say) is a problem cause those libs(drivers) arent compatible in the operating system,as Android changed ALOT from 2.1 to 2.2 and specially 2.3. You see,Z got the camera ongoing but with software decoding not hardware decoding,thats why you can make a photo but not a video,making a video is too much job for Software emulation (Try it with illusion pro,you'll result in a laggy 15fps 640x480 vid). What they are trying atm is to rewrite the camera driver in a way that it could cope with the hardware decoder . Cause the election is eigher camcorder or video-watching,and 90% want Video decoding rather than the Camcorder.
The camera itself is recognized and stuff but because the camera driver is very old already,it wont work on the new OS's.
Emulation is a good idea but still wont work alright afaik,its like trying to emulate a old windows 95 printer to your windows 7,yes you can emulate windows 95 but you wont be able to use the printer cause windows 7 doesnt know what it is or what to do with it,because the OS that handles the Hardware is the base one,not the emulated one.PSX and so on emulates the remote control cause Android base system knows the hardware that the software translates and makes you be able to use it and can interact with it (touch screen),but that happens because the base OS has and recognizes it,imagine if the base OS wouldn't know the touch screen.Having the buttons displayed on your display would be pointless cause you cant use them as they dont even exist for the base OS which is the important one.
EDIT : Thats why its called Emulation,cause it just Emulates the hardware,doesnt actually use it,has it or recognizes it ,its all software that translates from a unknown hardware to known software for the Base OS,but in our case if the base OS doesnt know the camera,its pointless that the Emulated OS does cause an emulation first needs an input to work,if that input isnt there it just wont work.
EDIT 2 : So its not the camera app,its the camera driver(libs),and there is no way you can use windows 95 drivers on windows 7 unless you rewrite them. (Heck,i remember i couldnt even use W95 drivers on WMillenium,and they had the same base kernel 9x so imagine).
But thats my thought,maybe there is something else i dont know and it could work.
Respect
xtrmshadow said:
Thats a very good idea mate,make an 2.1 emulator for 2.3 and up. But mate thats not the problem,its not the camera app itself thats not working,its the inside libs(drivers so to say) that were written in 2.1 (Lets say Windows 98) language and now to switch them to 2.2/2.3 (Windows 7 so to say) is a problem cause those libs(drivers) arent compatible in the operating system,as Android changed ALOT from 2.1 to 2.2 and specially 2.3. You see,Z got the camera ongoing but with software decoding not hardware decoding,thats why you can make a photo but not a video,making a video is too much job for Software emulation (Try it with illusion pro,you'll result in a laggy 15fps 640x480 vid). What they are trying atm is to rewrite the camera driver in a way that it could cope with the hardware decoder . Cause the election is eigher camcorder or video-watching,and 90% want Video decoding rather than the Camcorder.
The camera itself is recognized and stuff but because the camera driver is very old already,it wont work on the new OS's.
Emulation is a good idea but still wont work alright afaik,its like trying to emulate a old windows 95 printer to your windows 7,yes you can emulate windows 95 but you wont be able to use the printer cause windows 7 doesnt know what it is or what to do with it,because the OS that handles the Hardware is the base one,not the emulated one.PSX and so on emulates the remote control cause Android base system knows the hardware and can interact with it (touch screen).
But thats my thought,maybe there is something else i dont know and it could work.
Respect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx for your feedback. I think you may have misunderstood me though. I understand that the drivers, classes, etc have changed since 2.1. My idea is to emulate the old kernel , api's and camera app from 2.1 onto 2.2 or 2.3. Basically writing an x10 2.1 rom emulator, which will only emulate 2.1 camera. It wouldnt emulate the entire 2.1 system.
Think of a neogeo emulator...you load in the neogeo bios and you load in the game rom. Hey presto, u have a neogeo on your mobile...well not really...just emulated..
In the idea i have of emulating the camera from 2.1:
Your bios rom = 2.1 kernel, camera api and x10 camera driver..
Your game rom = camera app from 2.1.....
However, when u would run the app everything would be built into it and u wouldnt have to specify anything. It would load up looking just like the camera app....
Kinda like Wine on linux but only intended for the camera....to save on resources.
Just an idea....
I dont know what would be easier or quicker - to emulate the camera from 2.1 or to rewrite the drive on 2.2/2.3....however, you may need to rewrite it 2.4, 2.5, etc....as api's are always changing. An emulated camera wouldnt need to be rewritten with each new android release. We will always have to wait for someone to rewrite drivers if not emulated.
What do you think? Just an idea....
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
I Understand your idea mate,and im not saying its impossible, it might aswell be very possible and really apreciate your intention ,who knows ^^
But it doesnt sound like it would work for me,cause if its a hardware the base OS doesnt recognize,i doubt the emulated camera would work,cause when the emulation requests to contact the hardware to the base OS,it would just recieve a "unknown/incorrect request".Cause remember,emulations cannot direct-access the hardware,it first has to pass through the base OS.And thats why to emulate a machine as simple as the 33MHz PS1/PSX , you need at least 500MHz CPU to even try to run it,cause it cannot go to the CPU and simply do the chores.
Thats my point of view tho.
Respect
Ah now that you mentioned Wine on Linux.
What happens when you try to play a 3D accelerated game on Wine that tries to access the Graphics Card and you havent installed the graphics card drivers on Linux?It would just fail cause the base OS , Linux doesnt understand what the Emulator is telling it.
EDIT: Also dont know if you know Compiz-fusion for linux (or Beryl),its a Window Manager that gives you alot of effects and stuff on windows and many things(search beryl on youtube) but if you dont have a graphics driver installed ,it would just say "Hardware Graphics Card not detected,it cannot continue" so obviously you cant use VMWare to create a virtual machine and emulate the drivers on that VM cause for it,it wouldnt even exist as "Unknown" ,it wouldnt even exist at all.
Hope that helps you understand it more.
Respect
xtrmshadow said:
Ah now that you mentioned Wine on Linux.
What happens when you try to play a 3D accelerated game on Wine that tries to access the Graphics Card and you havent installed the graphics card drivers on Linux?It would just fail cause the base OS , Linux doesnt understand what the Emulator is telling it.
Hope that helps you understand it more.
Respect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm you may be right. what about virtual pc though? that is probably a better example. you can actually use hardware....for example, i could get a soundcard working properly on windows xp so i installed windows 98 via virtual pc....bingo, it worked....i could keep making music without buying another $1800 soundcard for ages.
therefore, have an app called "x10cam" which is emulates the 2.1 rom just like virtual pc....when you click on it, it would load emulate 2.1, but a completely cut down version with no apps, just the camera app and maybe even go straight into the camera app. on exit of the camera app, it quits the emulation and goes back to your 2.2/2.3 rom or home screen.
i dont know....sounds like it may work but might take some time...however, it may benefit in the long run though as the cam driver wont have to be rewritten each time of a new android release.
thanks for your replies too. i do appreciate it. someone may read this posts and come up with an alternate idea which would work
xtrmshadow said:
EDIT: Also dont know if you know Compiz-fusion for linux (or Beryl),its a Window Manager that gives you alot of effects and stuff on windows and many things(search beryl on youtube) but if you dont have a graphics driver installed ,it would just say "Hardware Graphics Card not detected,it cannot continue" so obviously you cant use VMWare to create a virtual machine and emulate the drivers on that VM cause for it,it wouldnt even exist as "Unknown" ,it wouldnt even exist at all.
Hope that helps you understand it more.
Respect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for mentioning Beryl, i actually wasnt aware of Beryl until you mentioned it. Much appreciated.
neomira said:
hmmm you may be right. what about virtual pc though? that is probably a better example. you can actually use hardware....for example, i could get a soundcard working properly on windows xp so i installed windows 98 via virtual pc....bingo, it worked....i could keep making music without buying another $1800 soundcard for ages.
therefore, have an app called "x10cam" which is emulates the 2.1 rom just like virtual pc....when you click on it, it would load emulate 2.1, but a completely cut down version with no apps, just the camera app and maybe even go straight into the camera app. on exit of the camera app, it quits the emulation and goes back to your 2.2/2.3 rom or home screen.
i dont know....sounds like it may work but might take some time...however, it may benefit in the long run though as the cam driver wont have to be rewritten each time of a new android release.
thanks for your replies too. i do appreciate it. someone may read this posts and come up with an alternate idea which would work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well,creating a VM (Virtual Machine = Virtual PC) might be able to make it work if the developer of the base ROM can at least make the OS Recognize the camera and access it (eventhought no image cause of the 2.1+ incompability),yes that might be possible . But still gotta write at least some basic drivers for the Cam.Lets say for exemple Z's 2.2 might perfectly be able to do what you've said cause the OS has 100% access to the camera,but cannot camcord cause of the base OS but the emulated one might aswell.
Yes that is a good idea as long as at least basic drivers are written.
And about you beeing able to Virtual PC that sound card,means that the base OS could already access it but it just didnt know how (Its like when you go on "Device Manager" and you see your device in "other" and it says the name it just cannot correctly interact with it cause of limitations)
Eventhought a Virtual Machine on our 280Mb of RAM wouldnt go too smooth but yes its a very good possibility.
Respect mate
sounds like a good idea and it will work in HD with the nice SE user interface .... it may take a long time to boot into camera app.... but still better than switching between roms for camera....
xtrmshadow said:
Well,creating a VM (Virtual Machine = Virtual PC) might be able to make it work if the developer of the base ROM can at least make the OS Recognize the camera and access it (eventhought no image cause of the 2.1+ incompability),yes that might be possible . But still gotta write at least some basic drivers for the Cam.Lets say for exemple Z's 2.2 might perfectly be able to do what you've said cause the OS has 100% access to the camera,but cannot camcord cause of the base OS but the emulated one might aswell.
Yes that is a good idea as long as at least basic drivers are written.
And about you beeing able to Virtual PC that sound card,means that the base OS could already access it but it just didnt know how (Its like when you go on "Device Manager" and you see your device in "other" and it says the name it just cannot correctly interact with it cause of limitations)
Eventhought a Virtual Machine on our 280Mb of RAM wouldnt go too smooth but yes its a very good possibility.
Respect mate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you are right. The only issue I can see is that a VM for just the camera functions would have to be a VERY VERY cut down version of 2.1 due to the 280mb of RAM. Otherwise it would be so slow.
Thanks xtrmshadow for the positive feedback. Maybe somebody might use this thread as an idea for something.
hemo1001 said:
sounds like a good idea and it will work in HD with the nice SE user interface .... it may take a long time to boot into camera app.... but still better than switching between roms for camera....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks hemo1001. much appreciated feedback.
that is my thought exactly, to prevent having to switch roms entirely just for the cam. also, if you think about a completely cutdown VM of 2.1 to access the cam, i dont think it would be cut down to only run what is necessary for the camera to function. I think it would be a better alternative than switching roms.
neomira said:
Yes, you are right. The only issue I can see is that a VM for just the camera functions would have to be a VERY VERY cut down version of 2.1 due to the 280mb of RAM. Otherwise it would be so slow.
Thanks xtrmshadow for the positive feedback. Maybe somebody might use this thread as an idea for something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed ^^ , Making a VM program for Android would be fairly easy as there are loads for Linux (VMWare,VirtualBox + more) and a very core version of 2.1 with only the necesary things for the task(No launcher,drivers for anything but camera,no apps etc).
Also i agree hemo1001 ,well said mate haha.
Hopefully someone that is very experienced with Android (Im only experienced on C++ and Hardware ><) takes a look into this and thinks about it ^^
Respect.
xtrmshadow said:
Agreed ^^ , Making a VM program for Android would be fairly easy as there are loads for Linux (VMWare,VirtualBox + more) and a very core version of 2.1 with only the necesary things for the task(No launcher,drivers for anything but camera,no apps etc).
Also i agree hemo1001 ,well said mate haha.
Hopefully someone that is very experienced with Android (Im only experienced on C++ and Hardware ><) takes a look into this and thinks about it ^^
Respect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so too mate. It would be great.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
the client on a vm depends on the hardware and drivers from the host. you can't emulate hardware on a client that doesn't work on a host.
At least we can emulate it in 2.2 freex10
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Using New Drivers
The cameras for the new sony models are different. But maybe there is a chance that
we can modify their libraries and use them on our phones.
I am not familiar with the camera libraries so I don't know how hard it is to modify the new libs in the xperia arc to match our hardware but it should be possible right?
i have read the complete discussion..phew...amazing amazing u guyz are u ll gave me a triggering pulse which straight away took me o my Embedded System Lectures from College..!!! Jokes apart i think the logic of Emulator is a better option as of now..atleast get a working camera..lets hope..all our experts are actually working hard hope for teh break through very soon..m not good with programming and stuff..so unfortunately i cannot even think but the whole logic behind Emulators was actually cleared after 2 yrs since i finished my Engineering in IT..lol..great stuff guyz..Proud to be on XDA since 5 yrs now sorry for going off topic..
camera - email.apk
hello,
i think since two month ago, if i write this or not ...
now, it's looking good for this information, but i dont know,
if this could help the camera-problem.
i'm working as an admin in a firma with some developers.
during android V1.6 - V2.1 we could sync exchange-server with no "device-limitation" by given all 5 minutes a device-code in.
since android V2.2 the email.apk changed very hard ... now we have to give all 5 minutes a device-code in. but the devices are not devices from the firma, so we dont sync anymore. but the info-lost is sometimes very critical.
one of our developers making an email.apk or find an email.apk with no exchange-securitas. the result was that barcodescanner and all other aps with camera inside dosnt work. although the camera.apk
now there is an email.apk outside with NO-EXCHANGE-Securitas and NO-Camera-PROBLEM.
i am glad to use the email.apk since 2 ore 3 weeks without any problems and securitas.
i dont belive that is only a driver/lib-problem because i used a htc leo and have the probs (and solution) that i above describes.
what i mean is, that could not only a driver-problem ... that could be a securitas-problem like ... "if you manipulate email than your cam doesnt work!"
i hope this is not for 1000% to trash and my bad english will automaticly changed to good-english by a developer with bad-english too (bad + bad = good
okokur
okokur, i didn't understand a thing you wrote but it was a very interesting read! i hope someone woth more knowledge picks it up.
this is a great thread guys, love your outside of the box thinking, brilliant!
sorry for going OT, best of luck, peace
Cool! The app works on Froyo & Gingerbread.. problem is in the drivers for the camera and kernel, which are being prioritized in jerpelea's gb build..
Imagine if something similar to virtualization took place at boot time?

[Q] Devs, what OS do you use for Android development?

I was just wondering. I know that Eclipse is the way to go, at least per the Android SDK website. But, I was curious what OS do most of you use? Windows or Linux? I'm currently setting up a Linux box and was going to use that to start learning Android development. I'm getting bored of doing .NET development at work and want to learn Android programming in my spare time (of what I have) and possibly to start developing apps.
What are some of the pros and cons of developing between the two OSes?
Thanks!
I stopped using Winblows when i randomly lost the ability to SBF with it.
Go Linux and never look back.
besides, virtualbox runs windows under linux better than windows runs by itself.
I used windows because it was my main OS and I used Ubuntu studio for audio recording. Windows has a lot of good tools available..like 5:1 with Linux.... Linux is good because you can Dev from source better/easier.
Now I main Ubuntu because I can play wow on it now...
Tapin' the Talk on the xSquared
Cheapxj said:
I stopped using Winblows when i randomly lost the ability to SBF with it.
Go Linux and never look back.
besides, virtualbox runs windows under linux better than windows runs by itself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to run Linux all the time, then when my kids got older and wanted to play various educational games from the library, I had to go to Winblows.
I do like Win 7 and now, with the kids tapped into technology at school, it's almost a given that I have to have Windows at home.
But, on my other machine (it's a p4 2ghz - ouch), I'm installing Linux and wanting to do some work on that machine so I don't have to dual-boot between Windows and Linux. Plus, I have WAY too many games (like Skyrim, Fallout, etc) on my Windows PC that I can't run Windows in a virtual machine, even though that machine is a quad-core with 8gbs of RAM and a high-end video card.
Anyways, as long as I can also SBF from Linux (which I googled and found out I can), it sounds like I'm going in the right direction in regards to using Linux for my programming Android apps.
Arch Linux, though I don't really do Android development, mostly because of the webapps I'm working on.
Gentoo/Funtoo are quite nice as well.
Sent from my MB870 using Tapatalk
I've been doing everything with Linux since I first installed Red Hat 5.2 back in '98. Today, I run either Ubuntu, for whom I developed and bug tracked, and Debian, because I'm still a purist at heart..
Sent from my Motorola Android Device using Tapatalk.

[Q] Virtual machine?

Hi all,
this may be a silly question, and i apologise if its already been asked....
so on my Windows 7 laptop, i want to run some old programs...i use the Windows XP virtual machine feature....
is there an equivalent app for ANDROID that i can install on my HDX8.9 that would effectively allow me to run a stock rom 'inside' the virtual machine?
...and obviously get full play access ....or there would be little point.
obivously there would most likely be performance issues etc. and you are running and O/S within an O/S which some may find confusing or cumbersome.
just a thought....anyone know?
regards
Dale
Safestrap I believe. 13.3.1 or 14. You have your original OS and then allow you to create another Android OS(kinda).
I think I missed the whole idea you were getting at...
purec0de said:
Hi all,
this may be a silly question, and i apologise if its already been asked....
so on my Windows 7 laptop, i want to run some old programs...i use the Windows XP virtual machine feature....
is there an equivalent app for ANDROID that i can install on my HDX8.9 that would effectively allow me to run a stock rom 'inside' the virtual machine?
...and obviously get full play access ....or there would be little point.
obivously there would most likely be performance issues etc. and you are running and O/S within an O/S which some may find confusing or cumbersome.
just a thought....anyone know?
regards
Dale
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a way to mount linux in a rooted device- without actually installing it. Oracle might have worked around that- but the problem with a virtual machine is they are not actually installed. Something as easy to run as android could work- but seriously, that could work.
purec0de said:
Hi all,
this may be a silly question, and i apologise if its already been asked....
so on my Windows 7 laptop, i want to run some old programs...i use the Windows XP virtual machine feature....
is there an equivalent app for ANDROID that i can install on my HDX8.9 that would effectively allow me to run a stock rom 'inside' the virtual machine?
...and obviously get full play access ....or there would be little point.
obivously there would most likely be performance issues etc. and you are running and O/S within an O/S which some may find confusing or cumbersome.
just a thought....anyone know?
regards
Dale
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your only option is an emulator, since windows runs on x86 and kindle has arm. Snapdragon 800 might be powerfull enough to emulate a windows xp, but be prepaired for serious perfomance issues. You should use the oldest version of windows that your software runs on. But for native android apps use 1mobile market.
Thanks all for the responses....just to clarify, what I was trying to ask is is there an app for android like the Virtual PC app on Windows that runs Android.....so I would be running a sandboxed android on android lol, kinda hoping for an alternative solution to the current root crisis....I.e. I have no root and its really frustrating that the awesome hardware in my HDX is crippled by not being able to access the play store....never mind the fact I can't load additional keyboards or wallpapers etc.
Sent from my KFAPWI using Tapatalk
I'm sure you could run it in chroot, you'd have to create a bash script to boot it
purec0de said:
Thanks all for the responses....just to clarify, what I was trying to ask is is there an app for android like the Virtual PC app on Windows that runs Android.....so I would be running a sandboxed android on android lol, kinda hoping for an alternative solution to the current root crisis....I.e. I have no root and its really frustrating that the awesome hardware in my HDX is crippled by not being able to access the play store....never mind the fact I can't load additional keyboards or wallpapers etc.
Sent from my KFAPWI using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No there is no application that allow that which I am aware of. But this almost what safestrap does.
Envoyé de mon KFTHWI en utilisant Tapatalk

Have anyone tried the Crossover app on your Yoga book (Wine)

Crossover is actually a commercial version of Wine with some extras. It's an application that, makes it possible to run Windows programs (.exe files) on other OS. It only works with Chromebook/Android devices with X86 processors
https://www.codeweavers.com/products/crossover-android
I have installed it on my Yoga Book and i got Steam and Unreal Tournament 2004 running. I also tried with Unreal Tournament GOTY and Battlefield, but i ran into some problems.
Does Krita work ?
I am thinking about installing Crossover. When I did the basic research I got confused about it running on Chrome vs. Android. Thanks for pointing out it works on the Yoga Book. I have applied and hope to get approved for the beta. I'll report back if and when I do.
hajkan said:
Does Krita work ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, because i can't run or install exe files. I can only run programs and games installed by the build in installer or steam. I wrote that as a feedback to the developer. Also that we can't use Esc key since it acts as the back button.
what about the windows performance then and the required space?
s01q said:
what about the windows performance then and the required space?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I havent mesaured the performance. But you can expect it to a lot better than dosbox, since it's not actually an Emulator That is also why your hardware need to have a x86 processor. It's also early to judge the performance, since it's still in Alpha.
It doesn't require a lot of space. I can't see how much space it uses since i have a couple games installed. The app itself were around 70 mb when i installed it.
FTL doesn't start up, sadly
ClausG76 said:
I don't know, because i can't run or install exe files. I can only run programs and games installed by the build in installer or steam. I wrote that as a feedback to the developer. Also that we can't use Esc key since it acts as the back button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok i just figured out, that the exe files must placed on the c drive to be runable. Krita x86 has a critical error when i try to run it. It might be fixed, since the app only is in alpha stage. I tried to run it as windows 7 and windows 10. maybe i need to manually install some aditional programs or modules like directx
Just got a reply from the developer. I should look out for an update with improved application compatibility. Sounds great to me
Crossover is using 416 mb space with nothing installed in it.
Thanks for sharing this info. I signed up and hope to test drive this on my Yoga Book too.
Hope to have some Windows photoshop action on the go.
Could not get Windows Gimp to install. Is there a lean version of photoshop or Lightroom that works with crossover Android yet?
There is a new update out. It should improve on compability, and it has a new interface.
How long did take for the beta invite to come? I would really like to give this a go, and i'm checking my email hourly.
Couple days
ClausG76 said:
Crossover is actually a commercial version of Wine with some extras. It's an application that, makes it possible to run Windows programs (.exe files) on other OS. It only works with Chromebook/Android devices with X86 processors
https://www.codeweavers.com/products/crossover-android
I have installed it on my Yoga Book and i got Steam and Unreal Tournament 2004 running. I also tried with Unreal Tournament GOTY and Battlefield, but i ran into some problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the procedure to installing crossover on to the yoga book? I'm interested in using it but I'm a little confused on the installation process cay you help/advise please. Si
Installing of crossover is just an install from the play store, once your accepted on the beta test. (It wont appear before.) After that, you then install the windows apps your interested in, from within Crossover. Steam works well if that's what your after. Tried a few games. I could not get any versions of IE to work yet. Not that most people would want to. Otherwise it depends what windows apps you want.
Office does not work, at least the 2016 or 2013 version
Hello
Have anyone had any success in using Crossover? After the last update I can't get steam to run anymore. And I have C&C Red alert running. But it's running in a tiny window and the window goes black when the menu appear. I have been playing around with the resolution setting, but it doesn't help.
ClausG76 said:
Hello
Have anyone had any success in using Crossover? After the last update I can't get steam to run anymore. And I have C&C Red alert running. But it's running in a tiny window and the window goes black when the menu appear. I have been playing around with the resolution setting, but it doesn't help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guy from Codeveawers replied
"A lot of the lightweight OpenGLES 3D graphics system that Android uses hasn't been connected into the corresponding OpenGL hooks that Crossover Android is trying to translate yet. So a lot of game titles will display a blank black screen or distorted graphics when run in Crossover Android. We continue to work on this and it should be able to run more games correctly over time."
I can run Finale 2014, Gimp 2.0, Libre Office, Text games editor, Mozilla Firefox, Note pad++.
I have tried games, but only Freeciv works good.
I have Zenfone 2 on RR 5.7.4.

ANDROID EMULATORS in Microsofts Hyper-v Enviornment

There are some threads here that may in part bring up an issue with running emulators on Windows 10. I can only describe my difficulties and for whatever reason I like to use BlueStacks. Before I get into that one there is another that I have difficulties using like Droid4X which unlike Bluestacks, Droid4X has been able to try starting up, but then my PC crashes. I havent tried to fix using Droid4, mostly centered on how to get BlueStacks running.
BlueStacks, when I would try to start it would result in a pop up that mentions I can't use it because of Windows 10 Creation aspect runs something called Hyper-V and this is what prevents me. There were a few walk-arounds and Hyper v could be disabled, however, now in order to disable it requires going into the BIOS. This seems like a big hassle if you want to just bounce in for a minute to test an app. If you run it all day it wont matter.
As of yet I cannot find an emulator I can use on Windows 10 without having to go that far to do so. Seems to me that MSN is targeting anything Android in my PC. There are reasons I wonder, why on Earth would the August 14th update be removing the ADB USB Interface, device not recognized took me a while to correct among a few other issues I was calling MSN Tech support very angry with them.
I dont care if MSN doesnt like the fact they have been locked out of my PC, there will be no more updating anything, I told them. I am stuck with this Hyper-V getting in the way of running an emulator on Win 10.
My question is there anyone aware of an Android Emulator that can be used on MSN OS that Im unaware of, and free?

Categories

Resources