Related
Wow did a antutu test on both of my phones and was expecting my L 9 to beat my escape. Boy was I suprised! My l 9 got a 10,568 ( pretty good compared to some). Then I ran the escape. My jaw dropped when I saw the amazing score of 15139. WHOA, it beat it in every catagory except RAM operation. My l 9 is running kumas rom with pure performance tweaks with cpu overclocked at 1.2 ghz. The escape is running sphinx rom with no cpu tweaks. Strange thing is every stats info I see on the escape says it has 1.2 ghz dc snapdragon. However im getting 1.5 ghz??? hmm Whats everyone else scores looking like for their L 9 ?
I get around 11k running mateo's CM 10.2 ROM.
Sent from my LG-P765 using Tapatalk
I have 9,616 running CyanogenMod 10.2 official (19/11/2013) :crying:
DarwinDeLaRosa said:
I have 9,616 running CyanogenMod 10.2 official (19/11/2013) :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because custom rom overclock both CPU & GPU so it has higher score.
My L9 on CM 10.2 by mateo with stock cpu and gpu speeds i have 9843 pts
With CPU at 1,2 GHz i have 10671
With stock CPU and GPU at 384 MHz i have 9732 pts
With CPU at 1,2 GHz and GPU at 384 MHz i have 10706
With CPU at 1,35 GHz and GPU at 384 MHz i have 11502
lwg45714 said:
My l 9 is running kumas rom with pure performance tweaks with cpu overclocked at 1.2 ghz. The escape is running sphinx rom with no cpu tweaks. Strange thing is every stats info I see on the escape says it has 1.2 ghz dc snapdragon. However im getting 1.5 ghz??? hmm Whats everyone else scores looking like for their L 9 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your LG Escape has got a better cpu and gpu and it would have shown better performance anyway. My L9 running stock showed maximum of 9600 with pure performance tweaks. But I don't think Antutu points can give you a good idea of how fast and smooth your phone is
madheado said:
Your LG Escape has got a better cpu and gpu and it would have shown better performance anyway. My L9 running stock showed maximum of 9600 with pure performance tweaks. But I don't think Antutu points can give you a good idea of how fast and smooth your phone is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I was getting at. Despite having a better cpu and gpu on the escape using both phones side by side in real world use the L9 performs better ALL around. The gpu was a big part of the escapes high score. However in side by side comparisons the L9S graphics seems to look better and out perform the escape. So I honestly believe all benchmark scores reflects what the phones software/hardware is CAPABLE of performing not really HOW it performs with daily use. This would explain why a score can as much as double by simply running a custom rom. I would never solely base my opinion of a phones performance on a benchmark score. Sure it can give you a idea of what its software/hardware is capable of. However you cant honestly get a true feel for the performance until you try the phone. So my escape murders my L9 in benchmark scores. BUT my L9 murders my escape in real life usable performance. Anyone else agree with this?
lwg45714 said:
BUT my L9 murders my escape in real life usable performance. Anyone else agree with this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I got your point! I guess, the only good thing about the Escape's cpu and gpu is that it's more battery-friendly, isn't it?
madheado said:
Yeah, I got your point! I guess, the only good thing about the Escape's cpu and gpu is that it's more battery-friendly, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, and both phones use the exact same battery. The escapes standby battery life is much longer than the L9 . During normal use the escape lasts longer as well by not to the degree of the standby difference.
Hello guys,
I want to buy a new phone and i hesitate between the OnePlus X and the galaxy A5 2016.
Is the X powerful and what's the avg Antutu score? Is the snapdragon 801 good to play games like Modern Combat 5 or Fifa 16?
Thanking you in advance
Antutu score does not matter much. Software is buggy on oneplus x. You should go for other choices but not samsung .
In principle, If playing such games is your prime necessity then you should go for a 5.5 inch display phone with a better processor and bigger battery. Just my opinion.
this is not a gaming device. really go for something else. h2os is bugfree.antutu score is 71k with OC on h2os
To answer your question regarding Antutu score - my score on stock rom with stock kernel was 50k. And the gpu performance rated by the Antutu app was "poor", if I remember correctly.
saurabh40629 said:
Antutu score does not matter much. Software is buggy on oneplus x. You should go for other choices but not samsung .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fotjon said:
In principle, If playing such games is your prime necessity then you should go for a 5.5 inch display phone with a better processor and bigger battery. Just my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
psychem said:
this is not a gaming device. really go for something else. h2os is bugfree.antutu score is 71k with OC on h2os
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fotjon said:
To answer your question regarding Antutu score - my score on stock rom with stock kernel was 50k. And the gpu performance rated by the Antutu app was "poor", if I remember correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks guys but i think gaming would be better than my Galaxy Grand Prime with snapdragon 410 an 1Gb of ram (22k on Antutu) an 5.5 inches is too big for my pocket. And psychem, how do you get 71k with a S801 ?
I saw on YouTube that Multitasking was wonderful with 3GB RAM. And will it be updated to Marshmallow or N (long term)?
kevin0304s said:
Thanks guys but i think gaming would be better than my Galaxy Grand Prime with snapdragon 410 an 1Gb of ram (22k on Antutu) an 5.5 inches is too big for my pocket. And psychem, how do you get 71k with a S801 ?
I saw on YouTube that Multitasking was wonderful with 3GB RAM. And will it be updated to Marshmallow or N (long term)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check the h2os thread for the scores. Yes this phone has better multi taking than even s6 in my experience. There are already many custom roms based on Mm
psychem said:
Check the h2os thread for the scores. Yes this phone has better multi taking than even s6 in my experience. There are already many custom roms based on Mm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And for Android N ?
kevin0304s said:
And for Android N ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They will come...
Can you guys say what is the maximum benchmark score for mido 4/64gb variant in latest software update I Mean miui 9 I got a score of 59k is it good?
meheboobalam1 said:
Can you guys say what is the maximum benchmark score for mido 4/64gb variant in latest software update I Mean miui 9 I got a score of 59k is it good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm? Are you still that concern with benchmarks these days?
anyways, i got 64K+ on ViperOs, a good score but in Quadrant i got uninspiring results. (SD, 3GB version)
59K is good enough as long its perform well as day to day driver without any hiccup.
GabrielScott said:
Hm? Are you still that concern with benchmarks these days?
anyways, i got 64K+ on ViperOs, a good score but in Quadrant i got uninspiring results. (SD, 3GB version)
59K is good enough as long its perform well as day to day driver without any hiccup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using official stock ROM. Not a fan of custom ROM not anymore ultimately we will come back to stock ROM so why. Not modified stock ROM like Xiaomi.eu
65k on AEX without any modifications, 4/64gb variant.
64-65k on redmi note 4x (sd) 3/32, rom RR
Mine is 0 coz I dun care... Lol
aabenroi said:
Mine is 0 coz I dun care... Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if I was going to use benchmarking apps, I would rather use Geekbench4 or PC Mark2.0.
DarthJabba9 said:
Well, if I was going to use benchmarking apps, I would rather use Geekbench4 or PC Mark2.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
aabenroi said:
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MTk is scoring high because it's faster but for short amounts of time because they overheat, after 10-15minutes of heavy usage like gaming it's reducing CPU/GPU frequency to reduce heat (thermal throttling), and then the performance is much worse.
Thats why benchmarks are useless, they are too short to show the real performance. For example Snapdragon 625 can keep the same performance for hours during heavy gaming without thermal throttling, because it's super power & thermal efficient.
aabenroi said:
Whatever bench, I don't trust bench anymore...
The mtk for example score very high bench but real performance is so bad.
Those huawei kirin score very low bench score, but it plays games, especially psp and dolphin emulation way-way better than snapdragon and mtk that have better bench score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The secret is to look at single-core performance. Multi-core benchmarks are always very high on MTK because their chips usually have more cores than others. However, how many apps actually use all those cores? All that the extra cores do is to suck your battery.
k3lcior said:
MTk is scoring high because it's faster but for short amounts of time because they overheat, after 10-15minutes of heavy usage like gaming it's reducing CPU/GPU frequency to reduce heat (thermal throttling), and then the performance is much worse.
Thats why benchmarks are useless, they are too short to show the real performance. For example Snapdragon 625 can keep the same performance for hours during heavy gaming without thermal throttling, because it's super power & thermal efficient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I agree,
Beside that, benchmark just measure raw power, big raw power is useless without good optimization.
Snapdragon n Kirin have lower raw power but easily beat mtk because they're way more optimized.
DarthJabba9 said:
The secret is to look at single-core performance. Multi-core benchmarks are always very high on MTK because their chips usually have more cores than others. However, how many apps actually use all those cores? All that the extra cores do is to suck your battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nowdays, mtk score very high at single core as well... But it still sucks...
Hi guys. I am thinking about V30, but want to find out what the storage speed is. I use AndroBench app from Play Store and run "Micro" test only. This shows me MB/s of the storage. As far as I know, the 500+MB is for UFS 2.0, 700+MB is UFS 2.1
Could any of you that have the device, ran the benchmark and tell me if the storage is USF 2.0 or 2.1
Here you go. Not fully getting what you want but here results
Charkatak said:
Hi guys. I am thinking about V30, but want to find out what the storage speed is. I use AndroBench app from Play Store and run "Micro" test only. This shows me MB/s of the storage. As far as I know, the 500+MB is for UFS 2.0, 700+MB is UFS 2.1
Could any of you that have the device, ran the benchmark and tell me if the storage is USF 2.0 or 2.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As written Here UFS 2.0 has maximum speed close to 500MB/s, UFS2.1 has it close to 800MB/s.
In that thread there are also some terminal commands to find serial number of internal memory in order to establish if is UFS 2.0 or not (just google the number)
lg3FTW said:
Here you go. Not fully getting what you want but here results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting... For example I ran LG G5 test and it showed the reading speed as 418MB or so and the other #s I don't remember.
Killua96 said:
As written Here UFS 2.0 has maximum speed close to 500MB/s, UFS2.1 has it close to 800MB/s.
In that thread there are also some terminal commands to find serial number of internal memory in order to establish if is UFS 2.0 or not (just google the number)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right. I have seen this or similar thread when I bought my Galaxy S8 in the summer. Now since V30 is out, I just wanted to see if the speeds of storage are fast or not. I also had HTC U11 as well and reading speed was 760MB or more, don't remember exactly. U11 was much faster when installing and updating apps, it was twice as fast than my S8.
lg3FTW said:
Here you go. Not fully getting what you want but here results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you run these? Or some of them?
Both the LG V30 and V30+ have Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) internal storage
LG's press release:
http://www.lgnewsroom.com/2017/08/l...ier-with-premium-cinematography-capabilities/
Memory:
V30: 4GB LPDDR4x RAM / 64GB UFS 2.1 ROM / MicroSD (up to 2TB)
V30+: 4GB LPDDR4x RAM / 128GB UFS 2.1 ROM / MicroSD (up to 2TB)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other sites even give the manufacturer and component number:
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/10/lg-v30-review-ultimate-creativity-tool.html
Inside is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset with Adreno 540 GPU, 4GB of LPDDR4X ram and either 64GB or 128GB of Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) internal storage, all with microSD card support for expandable storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This 6-inch display features a Quad-HD+ (1440 x 2880, 538 PPI) resolution 18:9 panel with nearly zero bezels all around, and is covered in Gorilla Glass 5. It’s also both Dolby Vision and HDR10 compliant. Inside is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset with Adreno 540 GPU, 4GB of LPDDR4X ram and either 64GB or 128GB of Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) internal storage, all with microSD card support for expandable storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As it’s pushing the same resolution screen as the G6 with a processor and GPU boost, it’s pretty obvious why the phone feels so blazing fast all the time. Combine this with Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) storage and you’ll quickly understand that LG has outfitted the V30 with the highest end components available right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even the Toshiba UFS 2.1 storage inside is a perfect match for Samsung’s best UFS 2.1 storage, which is used in most flagships now, and averages out just as fast as those chips. See the results of the benchmark suite we run for each phone, including 3DMark Slingshot, GeekBench 4, AnTuTu V6 and Futuremark’s PCMark internal storage test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.anandtech.com/show/11789/hands-on-with-the-lg-v30
Under the hood, the V30 is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 835, with LG using a heatpipe to assist in cooling. This is paired with 4 GB of LPDDR4X, and either 64GB or 128GB of UFS 2.1 storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ChazzMatt said:
Both the LG V30 and V30+ have Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) internal storage
LG's press release:
http://www.lgnewsroom.com/2017/08/l...ier-with-premium-cinematography-capabilities/
Other sites even give the manufacturer and component number:
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/10/lg-v30-review-ultimate-creativity-tool.html
This 6-inch display features a Quad-HD+ (1440 x 2880, 538 PPI) resolution 18:9 panel with nearly zero bezels all around, and is covered in Gorilla Glass 5. It’s also both Dolby Vision and HDR10 compliant. Inside is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset with Adreno 540 GPU, 4GB of LPDDR4X ram and either 64GB or 128GB of Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) internal storage, all with microSD card support for expandable storage.
As it’s pushing the same resolution screen as the G6 with a processor and GPU boost, it’s pretty obvious why the phone feels so blazing fast all the time. Combine this with Toshiba UFS 2.1 (THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB) storage and you’ll quickly understand that LG has outfitted the V30 with the highest end components available right now.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/11789/hands-on-with-the-lg-v30
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do go overboard sometimes, but man, you're beyond an over achiever. ?
You help a lot of people. ?
Just curious what kind of results users are finding. I've seen a few reviews on YouTube where testers are getting just over 600k and this number seems very low to me.
I have the Tencent variant 12GB/256GB Classic running Antutu v8.4.5
JPxM0Dz said:
Just curious what kind of results users are finding. I've seen a few reviews on YouTube where testers are getting just over 600k and this number seems very low to me.
I have the Tencent variant 12GB/256GB Classic running Antutu v8.4.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"youtube testers" usually only have pre-production software. Better to show a lower score in testing, then you get the "release product" and its faster.
Would be shyte if you got lower scores than the testers hey haha :fingers-crossed: :good:
Global 16gb/512gb ?
Nice!
Rooted with TWRP and adrenoteam sd865 update
Global 12 128
Global 12GB/512GB version with Kirisakura kernel
128 GB 12 Ram rooteado
12gb ram versão strix Android 11 sem root
Android 10Q and boost profil i have create for games and benchmark
722 k in last AnTuTu v9.3.5
can you pass the profile?
antpavtoto said:
Android 10Q and boost profil i have create for games and benchmark
722 k in last AnTuTu v9.3.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i give you here.
if you can't use it like this. i put you a video to show all screens of this configuration.
ok i give you a video show you how configure this profile you can use in any application you put in armoury crate to boost it. you need use ihis peofile with 144 Hz screen in display option to have best framerate.
have fun.