Could somebody please explain why the Snapdragon 821 @ 2.4 GHz has TWICE the single-core benchmark score compared to the MediaTek Helio P35 @ 2.3 GHz!?
https://nanoreview.net/en/soc/qualcomm-snapdragon-821
https://nanoreview.net/en/soc/mediatek-helio-p35
I can confirm that Snapdragon 821 devices indeed perform way better when it comes to say, emulation, but the question is... WHY? (considering it's only 0.1 GHz ahead in terms of clock speed)
Related
I searched and searched and searched, I really want to know if qualcomm 1.5 ghz and adreno 220 in the tmo variant samsung galaxy s 2 is equal in performance as his brethren that sport the exynos and mali gpu. All the benchmarks I can find for the adreno are on qhd resolution. I thought about it but I couldn't find any backing to my theories that the adreno would run faster on a wvga resolution than qhd since the sgs2 is a wvga.
and would the qualcomm 1.5ghz soc run as efficient and fast as the exynos clocked at 1.2?
Hi, i'm fairly new into this, but it got me interested, i've been reading about some "cheap high performance" processors, such as de renesas ev2 and the rk2918, with the ev2, some manofacturers do say that it is possible to use android honeycomb, the ev2 is a decent for the price dual core procesor, with a gpu that performs really close to the qualcomm mali that was on the first ipad (about 15m p/s) , the cpu is arm9. The rockchip does excel in 3d performance, its neon gpu is said to be able to get 60m p/s, while the processor itself is not bad, is A8 clocked at 1.2 ghz, single core. With this being told, i'm wondering if rk2918 devices will be able to run smoothly the soon to be released ics, or atleast the honeycomb (its source has not been released yet), or even though the ev2 has a worse gpu, is still a better pick? thanks in advance for your comments (except if they are insults)
Still wondering if processors suck as the rk2918 or the ev2 will be good enough to run a newer release of android, other than gingerbread, regards.
I just picked up a Pantech Burst and it is advertised as Dual-Core 1.2Ghz, but when I ran Qualcomm's Benchmarking utility (and Quadrant) - they all show 1.5ghz.
I called Pantech Support Line and they confirmed its a mistake!
Anyone else who has a Burst, download Vellamo, which is Qualcomm's Official Benchmarking Utility, to see the specs:
Cores: 2
CPU: 1.5ghz
According to Google it has a APQ8060 CPU. They may have had plans to underclock it originally, my Touchpad shipped with the same chip underclocked to 1.2ghz. But the processor itself is rated at 1.5ghz. Even on devices that ship with it set at 1.2ghz, its relatively safe to overclock it to 1.5ghz.
Hi, if you overclock Pantech Burst from 1.2Ghz to 1.5Ghz, did you notice any battery drain faster , and performance boost ?
Most everything is currently being discussed on another thread. atleast until we can get our own section on here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1487576
Hello, Good Day.!!
Hey guys i am little bit confuse about my Xperia mini Hardware
According to GSM ARENA The phone has
Chipset Qualcomm QSD8255 Snapdragon
CPU 1 GHz Scorpion
GPU Adreno 205
What does the CHIPSET stands for i mean what is the work of chipset? is it a Mainboard??
Some people said the phone has Snapdragon processor but here it says Scorpion.Snapdragon is a processor or a chipset??
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_t...the_functioning_of_processor_chip_and_chipset
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)
Snapdragon is a chipset, Scorpion is a CPU. Every computer nowdays has both CPU and chipset, including smartphones. Also, in smaller/portable devices GPU can be embedded into chipset. IIRC Snapdragon is one chip that contains it all, CPU, GPU and Chipset.
Motherboard is a board that contain those chip(s)
Hello Developers,
Greetings to everyone!
I am looking at the specifications of a device using the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor which is advertised at 1.2 GHz speed. When I tried to boot up the device, the internal specifications only show 1.19 GHz. My thought is that the device was designed at a lower clock speed considering performance vs. device heat & battery life. Is this generally true? and is it advisable to design a device at full rating?
In a project/business scenario, how do we explain this discrepancy in lay man's term? (e.g. the business requirement is for a manufacturer to create a device performing at 1.2 GHz using Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 but the device is running at 1.19 Ghz only). What information can we request from the manufacturer to address the concern?
Thank you in advance!