Related
I moved over to Android a while back from an iPhone 4 and there was one app called Magic Shutter which enabled you to take amazing long exposure photos. I was wondering if there is any app which could pertain the same results for Android or specifically the Galaxy s2.
+1 This would be really nice to know. I would also appreciate any answer to this.
Development
I talked with the people at Anistar studios (the developers of the Magic Shutter App for iPhone) and they said that they just need to complete the version upgrade for ios devices then they will start developing for android
In the meantime, use fireworks scene mode. You can stretch your shutterspeed for up to 1 second.
drigz08 said:
In the meantime, use fireworks scene mode. You can stretch your shutterspeed for up to 1 second.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
This is the way I use too.
last time i looked there was no boss for a camera quick release on phone, ... 1 sec is a long time to hold any camera without camera shake, let alone a phone shurley beter doing it post ? maby im wrong here but point is have movement shown on part of image but have it sharp as well. or maby its just artistic interpretation lol
Here is a sample. I shot it quickly, if done right, 1 second can fill the whole frame with light from left to right. I just did it on half on purpose.
-My hand is not steady so I was not able to maintain position within 1 second. It is as evidenced by the curved red light. If done right, the lights line will be straight and you wil not get blurry road.
lights art by John.Drigz, on Flickr
Found an App
I found a very nice application called Light-paint Live which does a great job at light painting. Have yet to test it at night outside but anyways I suggest you try it. Its found in the marketplace ;D
problem is to get truly good star photography we need 20-25 second exposures not 1 second. if you want a shot of the milky way for example you really need 20-25 second exposures.
Introductory:
Hello all, cell phones produce radiation just in case you did not know. These radiation levels are measured in a value called SAR(Specific Absorbtion Rate) and it literally is the measurement of just the bottom line of what the human body absorbs, rather than just the amount that it radiating(ha, get it?) around the device. Radiation is bad in the human body where it is directly related to certain issues, including directly reducing bone density in the body. I am posting this as an accurate informational thread where you can draw your own conclusions based off of facts.
SAR Levels:
SAR, which stands for Specific Absorbtion Rate, levels fluctuate depending on numerous factors, in which we must go over in order to accurately understand. The key thing to understand is that the further the device is from your body, the levels begin to diminish by the milimeter(mm).
For a phone to receive an FCC certification, the device cannot have a SAR level of more than 1.6 watts per kilogram in the US, and 2.0 in Europe.
Galaxy Note Series Tests by Samsung:
Let's take a look at the Note series in order to keep this sequential and easier to remember from a timeline fashion of perspective. The Galaxy Note 1 was released first(obviously) and is the model number SGH-I717 for reference. Taken from Samsung's website directly, here are the Note 1 results, including the way that they perform their own measurements:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You can see in this writing the methods that are used for testing, and that the body specific SAR tests have the device at 1.0 centimeters(CM), equivalent to 10 millimeters(mm) away. Keep this in mind and we'll touch up on this later.
And here are the Note 2 specific values:
And here are the Note 3 specific values:
So as you can see the comparisons above, the Note 3 effectively produces 153% more Head SAR than the Note 2, and 196% more Head SAR than the Note 1!
I would calculate the Body SAR differences but we have a big problem with Samsung's specific tests...they test these values with the device 1.0 CM(or 10mm) away from the body. This Body SAR calculation is useless to you if your phone presses against your body at 0 mm away!
Let's think...why would Samsung measure in this fashion at 1.0 CM away? Well the Note 3 produces 1.28 Body SAR at 1.0 cm away, so the big question is what would it produce at 0 mm away/ AKA in your pants pocket? Maybe it would exceed the FCC limitation of 1.6?
CNET Testing:
Now let's take a look at a recent test performed by CNET on 1/16/14 to see what they have found in differences in the Note series in particular:
The above is literally all of the information they posted where it is tough to tell how the test was performed and/or what body part it was performed against. By comparing the numbers, it seems as though they tested the head only since it matches the Head SAR values by Samsung.
But there is only but one main discrepency...the Note 3 reads 0.63 SAR value by Samsung, while CNET tested it at 0.9 SAR. Which one holds true?
Device Model Top Charts:
As you can see in the following results, our devices do not hold the highest SAR values compared to the worst out there *ehem* Motorola!
And here are the lowest SAR values amonst all devices. Keep in mind how the Note 2 is 4th lowest.
Theorycrafting:
I researched more into studies being performed per the distance of an object from humans and have found some interesting results.
Here is a model of the human head for reference, spefical model for SAR testing:
And here is are one test's results from testing the SAR levels after altering different distances:
This is just me tipping the iceberg to not go on and on.
Shifting gears toward current events, check out 2/14/14's event of the Army buying 7,000 Note 2's for its troops HERE
The reason why I feel that this is relevant is that they definitely would not want to have their troops being exposed to radiation levels higher than other devices. What makes more sense though is that they tested it for quite some time before it was rolled out, but who knows?
General Radiation Reduction Techniques:
-Consider a cell phone radiation reduction case, Google Pong research to get started since I'm probably not allowed to post links
-Consider buying a device with low SAR levels
-Keep the device out of your pocket or anywhere where it is directly against your skin. Even a hip holster might help keep it a few cm away, or carry it in a purse/backpack.
-Use speakerphone as often as possible to keep the device far from your head.
-Devices use the most radiation when beggining and ending calls. Pull the phone away from your head, even if just a few centimeters, when beginning and ending calls.
-Devices also use high radiation when "hunting for a signal". This occurs when your device has no signal, and needs to omit more power consistently to find one. So keep it away at these times.
-Bluetooth uses less radiation, but overall can be more damage from keeping it on your head for long periods of time. LOSE THE BLUETOOTH!
-Text instead of calling whenever it is applicable/feasible
-Don't sleep with the device near your head....think about it, 6+ hours of it so close to your head...
-Last things I wanted to mention are beefing up on certain things you eat.
a.) Eat seaweed, it's very powerful against radiation
b.) Look for natural supplements that particularly repair already damaged cells in your body from radiation. They are alpha lipoic acid and vitamins C and E...BUT ONLY IF YOU DON'T GET THESE FROM NATURAL DIET
Conclusion:
Considering all of the above along with knowing that we are the guinea pigs for long term cell phone radiation, I strongly feel that it's best to consider SAR levels when purchasing a device. The SAR levels are obviously increasing with each new model being released and should be monitored closely.
It seems to show as being a factor toward brain tumors and bone density loss in only 1 of 2 legs in people(where they always kept their cell phone in the same pocket). I did not go much into detail here about these particular researches/tests, but I would recommend to now start looking into the tests performed for "decade-long cell phone radiation exposures". Imagine us after 50 years of exposure, and please feel free to comment here.
Your voice and opinions matter in this world, and you should speak up since you have a right to your own opinions, and I will respect it no matter what. While I don't really know the true effects of the radiation, my opinion is that I'm open minded so I'll keep the cell away from my body to be safe. I will post this across multiple forums that it belongs in and moderators, please let me know if I happen to post this in a forbidden section. Don't censor truth, and let the thread live.
Thank you for your time reading all of this and I hope it helps. If so, please rate the thread 5 stars and hit Thanks solely to promote the spreading of the word.
Wow! That's a lot of info. F*** it! We are all gonna die from some sort of cancer. It is what it is. Well at least I will have my Note 3 to communicate with everyone and let them know how I am gonna die.
Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
JonSCSL said:
Wow! That's a lot of info. F*** it! We all are gonna die from some sort of cancer. It is what it is. Well at least I will have my Note 3 to communicate with everyone and let them know how I am gonna die.
Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I proudly support and encourage this attitude.
It's a phone, I use the heck out of it for talking (bluetooth, though), and won't change that one jot.
Sent from my SM-N900P using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
I co-sign with that attitude, no one will live for ever so why not enjoy the time you have!
I just want to point out that the information you're presenting is referring to non-ionizing radiation. Technically speaking, the visible light given off by the LED is electromagnetic "radiation" as well. As innocuous as light seems, it can be harmful in certain situations: UV light can cause skin damage, blue light may contribute to vision problem like macular degeneration, use of cell phones at night (such as lying in bed) can disrupt circadian rhythms which has a whole host of secondary health effects.
My point is, the radiation you're talking about is electrons moving. It's not the kind of radiation that comes from an X-ray, or a linear acceleration, or a dirty bomb, or the fallout from nuclear detonations, etc. Those kinds of radiation, ionizing radiation, pose serious health risks.
I'm not saying there are no negative health effects from the EM radiation cell phones produce, but no one should confuse the potential for harm with the well-established harmful effects of ionizing radiation. I'm of the personal opinion that the amount of EM put off by a cell phone poses much less harm to our bodies than a modern lifestyle: sedentary, poor nutrition, toxic chemicals in the environment, air pollution, etc. etc.
Truth be told, if the FCC would let us get away with it, I would have no problem cranking up the power of the antenna in order to get better signal.
People worry way too much about stuff. Use your phone like a phone. By the time your radiation exposure is high enough to be of concern, you will have been dead for a long time. Please dont encourage people to use speaker phone as often as possible, its already bad enough that we have to hear one side of the conversation of people who feel they have to yell into the phone right by their face.
BTW. Samsung doesnt test at 1cm, the FCC does.It's a standardized test that is part of the approval process. And, its very unlikely that the Army chose the Note 2 due to radiation levels....
I for one thank you for providing this information. FCC, FDA and the Government alike are all trying to kill us so I will defiantly heed your warning and will think twice about taking a call. I do not want any type of cancer and I would like to see my children and my grandchildren. I know one day I will die but we should not be paying Samsung or any OEM to kill us slowly like we pay the Government, Pharmaceuticals, and our jobs that we give our life to so that day will come sooner. You idiots sound like r-tards. Use your freaking brain, wake the f* up people!
Hey Guys!
It’s a pleasure to see nothing but talent around the forum. Be it a Dr.Zen review, an answer to a query or a simple capture, the forum certainly blossoms expertise across several fields. Although, with special reference to the Fanography section and Zen is your Eyes, what I did realize was that many of you have the talent to look through a beautiful frame but not its overall composition. Here’s why I thought of giving you a few tips on the basics of photography.
Here’s What Could Have Gone Wrong With Your Capture:
1. Focus
Know that a beautiful picture starts with a sharp frame. A blur image would never be recognized as a beautiful image. It is important that you decide the subject within the frame. There could be a series of elements to focus over, although, choosing one over the rest will help you focus right. Let’s take a look at the example posted below:
Here’s what happens when you don’t focus right! Let’s say you’re in a hurry and do not focus over the subject, in this case, being the mug, the camera automatically picks up a subject within its range in the frame. In the picture below, the camera has focused on the calendar.
2. Stay Still
In relation to the first point, always make it a point to stand or sit still when capturing an image or your image is going to end up with a blur.
If you missed out on my article, here the link: How to shoot steady images with your Zenfone
3. Bad Lighting
This often comes across as the Mother of all problems. Your frame could be just perfect, although a bad lighting condition could literally ruin all emotions stored within the picture.
In such situations, adapt to a good shutter speed or make use of a White balance filter.
Although, make sure you pick through the right filter. The Cloudy Filter for example could make someone’s skin look orange. Below is an example of the same:
4. Avoid the Excuse
If you love a frame, go ahead and click it. Do not wait until the sun sets in the west or rises in the east. Chances are that you could lose a good frame, waiting for something that may not really help with a great frame. Instead, take up the challenge and shoot your best.
5. Cluttered Background
A cluttered background not only comes across messy but restricts a possible story that would have otherwise contributed to the capture. Below is an example of a cluttered frame. There’s so much going in within the frame that it’s strenuous to even look through it. Think about it? Would you want to shoot a frame this cluttered?
6. Subject
Apart from a good frame, story and rest, choosing the right subject is equally important. Just before you could go ahead and capture that pretty frame, ask yourself, would the subject do justice to my frame?
In the example posted below, the horse makes an additional subject and could as well be excluded.
7. Composition
Have you always got your composition right? A rather crucial feature, you may want to read up on the 'Rule of Thirds'. I have covered it in one of my articles. Make sure you look through it to get a deeper understanding on the same: 10 Zenfone Photography Tips Every Beginner Should Know!
8. Photoshop/Edit
Now that you have a beautiful image in place, avoid over doing it at the editing table or editing app. You don't want to ruin your capture at this stage, certainly not after taking the trouble to work your way through it. Below are a few examples for you to understand. If you over do the post processing bit, your pictures could stay overexposed or even grainy.
Hope this post comes across useful! This thread is open to suggestionsand discussions!
Thanks.. It's helpful!!
Hello everyone!
[You may skip the first paragraph]
I'm considering to buy Redmi Note 5. I see that it's nearly the copy of Note 4 with 18:9 display and I'm currently using Note 4. However, I have to buy a new phone for my father. So, I'm thinking on Note 5 since I'm quite happy with Note 4 choice. Anyway, I appreciate if you help me with below questions.
> I have a weird problem with Note 4. I wonder if you faced something similar with Note 5, even if you didn't please test it:
When I use the same static screen (like reading a pdf or in reddit app the top bar is constant) for long time with high brightness, the picture in the screen is burns into the screen. Classic burn in problem but this device has an lcd display. Good thing is, it is not a burn-in for real. The screen will return to it's normal and clear state within several hours.
(For example, now I have my keyboard burnt into screen since I have typed a long post here. I hope that it will pass in next hours when I let my phone rest. Brightness is around %35.)
> As far as I know, the kernel source is not released yet. When should we expect it to be release? Note 4 has pretty decent developer support in xda. Do you think Note 5 will get support close to 4? All I want actually a clean aosp rom nothing much.
> Have you faced any issues that bothers you?
Thanks.
Hi! Welcome to the thread! For sure it is a great buy if you consider other midrange phones as measure. If you compare this from other Xiaomi phones, the superior Note 5 Pro would be better. Essentially it's what you'd call a 'sidegrade' from the Note 4, you have the 5 Pro for a clear upgrade from that.
Also regarding your problem, I haven't experienced any burn in on my screen (considering I use it most of the time) but also not in high brightness either, so can't really tell.
As far as issues, I don't have any. It's a great bang for buck phone. It does everything I want it to do. But custom roms, it will have some but I would think a bit lesser than the Note 4 as most users would probably go directly to the 5 Pro, but rest assured, AOSP roms will still be developed for this device as there are still a considerable amount of users with this phone.
Just a heads up for people who seeks information :
I bought the device and compared to Note 4:
- It's really good overall.
- Screen looks more alive.
- Screen is black when it's off while note 4's screen is more gray.
- 18:9 ratio is cool.
- No more retarded xiaomi buttons. (navbar on screen = customizable)
- Lighter.
- Looks more modern.
- No more burn in (read first post for note 4 burn in problem, it was a everyday problem for me)
There is one small negative point I should mention. Note 4's fingerprint reader is a little bigger and thus it's eaiser to use. Not a big deal though, this one also fine.
Note 4 is also a good device and it served me well for nearly 10 months. This one is a little better with better screen and design.
These are my first impressions, I'll come back to add more if I find something annoying. If there is nothing new that means all good so far or I might be dead. The latter is less likely though, lol.
Hello everyone, does anyone have any eye problems after a short use of the device? Some users in Russia complain that less than 5 minutes of use, their eyes begin to hurt.