Question Is "holi" actually the device codename, or only the SOC codename? - OnePlus Nord N200 5G

I've found this tweet, which names "holi" as the codename for a "Qualcomm Snapdragon 400-series chipset which supports 5G! It's internally the SM4350 with 8 cores and an Adreno 619 as well for the GPU. It supports 90Hz."
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344685193534320644
Could "holi" be the name of our chipset, similar to how "koni" is the name of the OnePlus 8T chipset? There were reports of OnePlus 8Ts showing "koni" as the codename in recovery, while the codename for the phone itself is "kebab", so I'm wondering.
If so - does anyone know how we can find the real codename of the device?

The codename for the unlocked variant of the Nord N200 is "dre9", and the codename for the T-Mobile variant is "dre8t". OnePlus publishes the codenames for their devices on their Open Source Releases wiki page on GitHub. "holi" is probably the codename for the N200's chipset.

lzgmc said:
"holi" is probably the codename for the N200's chipset.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a probably. It is. I have the unlocked variant of the N200. Product name in fastboot is "holi"

Related

Wondering if the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 will get the Cyanogenmod 13?

Just as the title says . I dont mind the waiting to be honest but will it happen? I mean they have the qualcom variant so I hope they will bring out one for our note 3
I am there with you brother !
The phone is pretty awesome and I CM wil be available soon . Ever thought about making the ROM yourself?
count me in. It would be just super great to have CM on the Redmi Note 3!!!
Count me in on wishing this was available....
DarthKeizer said:
Just as the title says . I dont mind the waiting to be honest but will it happen? I mean they have the qualcom variant so I hope they will bring out one for our note 3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any version of Cyanogenmod for the Redmi Note 3 would be great. Very disappointed in this phone. The reviews were - are - very complimentary, the hardware specs are really good, but for beyond-China buyers the software problems are a deal-breaker. The reviews didn't mention the threat of a locked bootloader...
http://www.xda-developers.com/xiaomi-locks-bootloader-on-recent-devices/
I've applied for bootloader unlock, but no word back from Xiaomi. Wish now I'd paid extra $100 for a ZUK Z1, Cyanogenmod out of the box.
There are multiple Custom Roms for the Redmi Note 3 available in the official MIUI forum.
All 5.1.1 Custom Roms:
CM 12.1:http://en.miui.com/thread-210418-1-1.html
MoKee: http://en.miui.com/thread-215319-1-1.html
BlissPop: http://en.miui.com/thread-214718-1-1.html
PAC-Man:http://en.miui.com/thread-214488-1-1.html
Resurrection Remix: http://en.miui.com/thread-215699-1-1.html
Flyme OS:http://en.miui.com/thread-213952-1-1.html
All 5.0.2 Custom Roms:
AOSP:http://en.miui.com/thread-210071-1-1.html
SphinX (Based on stock):http://en.miui.com/thread-207019-1-1.html
DEV Global Rom (Based on stock):http://en.miui.com/thread-214146-1-1.html
But because all the non Stock Roms are based on Redmi Note 2 Roms, the fingerprint sensor isn't working and 4G is only working on SIM slot 1. On SIM slot 2 only 2G is working.
With the Redmi Note 3 Snapdragon 650 model being available, im guessing getting CM13 running onto that will be a easier task?
What rom can supporting all sensor for Redmi Note 2?
droiduser said:
With the Redmi Note 3 Snapdragon 650 model being available, im guessing getting CM13 running onto that will be a easier task?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Runnig any version of cyanogenmod will be a easier task, because Snapdragon processors are officially supported by the cyanogen team and MediaTek processors are not.
Cameo164 said:
Runnig any version of cyanogenmod will be a easier task, because Snapdragon processors are officially supported by the cyanogen team and MediaTek processors are not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not necessarily true. Android One devices are supported - they are mediatek but their source code is released as they are google supported. So its more to do with source code than anything else.
syl0n said:
That is not necessarily true. Android One devices are supported - they are mediatek but their source code is released as they are google supported. So its more to do with source code than anything else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right but I think in this case it will be a easier task because as I know MediaTek didn't published the kernel source code for the normal Redmi Note 3 (not sure). So creating/porting cm for Redmi Note 3 Pro will be easier because Qualcom publishes many of their kernel source codes.

Question Regarding NOTE 3

How to define the mediatek version and qualcomm version ?? be specific
Planned to buy the Qualcomm one
Is their any screen protected their?
Where is the kernel source link of qualcomm version ?
1. What do you mean by "define"
2. ????
3. http://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-3/how-to/kernel-source-redmi-note-3-pro-t3349609
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=7863&idPhone2=7769
Relevant part is the processor.
The Redmi Note 3 aka Mediatek aka Hennessy version features a Mediatek MT6795 Helio X10.
The Redmi Note 3 Pro aka Qualcomm aka SnapDragon aka Kenzo version features a Qualcomm MSM8956 Snapdragon 650.
There's no special gadgets like a case or screen protector coming with the Note 3.
On a side note: Your title is really bad for search engines, since it's way too broad. Try to think of something better next time, to help others, who have the same questions, find your thread. e.g. "[Q] Differences in versions, delivery content & Kernel source"

Why Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Mediatek) is neglected?

While Snapdragon has CM14, Mediatek has only CM12.1. Why Redmi Note 3 (Mediatek) is left behind?
Well, MediaTek is known of very bad in terms of custom developing. They just rarely releases source code.
So Xiaomi also didn't release source code for hennessy yet. And I'm 100% sure they won't do it. Without that it's hard to make stable custom ROM, because devs can't build custom kernel.
Also there are many more people who have SD than MTK and more people=better community=more custom developing
as said by kubap, Mediatek and Nvidia devices (except that nexus 7) won't get their source code released so developers can't build any stable ROM from source, that's why you get ported or no roms.
And MTK Redmis are banned in India right now. Whole India has only Snapdragon RN3. Snapdragon edition is the most popular all over the world. So the developers are mainly from China.

Adding Galileo support to Redmi Note 3 Global / Special Edition

Hi,
I have the RMN3 SE and I wonder if someone has tried to add Galileo GNSS support. Currently there is a phone with a Snapdragon 652 which has Galileo enabled. It is the BQ Aquaris X5 Plus.
Firmwares: https://www.bq.com/en/support/aquaris-x5-plus/support-sheet
BQ kernel source Github: https://github.com/bq/aquaris-X5-plus/
And a github repository whose source code backtracks up to Kenzo: https://github.com/x5plus-dev
Spanish forum discussion with CM 13.0 for that phone: http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=1262607
Note that this phone is sold in Europe, so it uses the same bands as Kate, albeit with a different baseband version with Galileo enabled.
Any clues if it would be possible and what should have to be modified? NON-HLOS.bin, GNSS related libraries? The phone does not have VoLTE support, or at least it is not listed by BQ as a feature. On the other hand it as NFC.
Any news?
Kenzo/Kate support Galileo GNSS?
Thanks.

Code Aurora Git & The Android releases.

Hello Guys!
I have an InFocus m370i device which has no kernel sources available.. It has an MSM8909 (Snapdragon 210) chipset. I found out about CodeAurora, under which there was something like Android for MSM. i understand that MSM relates to Qualcomm snapdragon chipsets. What is this Git? is it providing kernel sources for universal MSM8909 chipset? i have an release named for my chip with an android version 7.01.02
your help will be appreciated the most.

Categories

Resources