Hey Everyone,
Just upgraded to Free X10 Beta 4. Everything is working fine, however, my Quadrant score has dropped to about 900. With beta 3 it was 1300. With beta 2, about 1500. So, it keeps dropping with every upgrade.
Does anyone know why this is? Any potential fixes?
it seems to be very different for everyone.
some have better. some have worse.
i can agree that with beta3 i was getting 1500+
when i flashed to beta4 i was getting nothing over 1350
and now even having gone back to beta3 im still not getting over 1400.
so whatever it did, it was clearly permanent since i did a factory reset and EVERYTHING. sucks right ?
what is the benefit of 1350 or 1500 ? It sounds both high...I do have 1310 at beta4, but for what it is necessary to have higher scores? Playing fast games? Or is it just a matter of who gets the highest number? My phone is going like crazy on 1310.....If it's just about the numbers, I know for a car more Horsepower doesn't mean automatically more speed, it depends on more than just the horsepower...
I really don't know where this amount stands for, I asked before but no one could explain it clearly...
My quadrant dropped at 1100..
PollPixx said:
what is the benefit of 1350 or 1500 ? It sounds both high...I do have 1310 at beta4, but for what it is necessary to have higher scores? Playing fast games? Or is it just a matter of who gets the highest number? My phone is going like crazy on 1310.....If it's just about the numbers, I know for a car more Horsepower doesn't mean automatically more speed, it depends on more than just the horsepower...
I really don't know where this amount stands for, I asked before but no one could explain it clearly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well the problem for me is. at first with beta3 i was getting 1500+ the first run with quadrant.
now that ive tried beta4 and gone BACK to beta3 i get around 1000 to 1190 the first run. and need 3 or 4 runs to get up to 1300. and the scores in between 1 and 4 may be lower or higher than the previous. so now it just seems something has made it inconsistent.
but i do agree with you my phone is still fast.
PollPixx said:
what is the benefit of 1350 or 1500 ? It sounds both high...I do have 1310 at beta4, but for what it is necessary to have higher scores? Playing fast games? Or is it just a matter of who gets the highest number? My phone is going like crazy on 1310.....If it's just about the numbers, I know for a car more Horsepower doesn't mean automatically more speed, it depends on more than just the horsepower...
I really don't know where this amount stands for, I asked before but no one could explain it clearly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Quadrant Obsession" is the sequel to the "Free RAM obsession"!
I happened to read this article today and it helped understand a few things!
Check it out!
I used to have around 1500 with beta 4.
Recently i installed data2sd and this works like a charme.
I now get scores around 2500
Phone is stable only had 1 fc but that was right after the installation so i think the data wasn't setteld yet now it runs for 3 days wirh no problems at all.
Z you really rock...
Thanks for Xrecovery, your super roms and data2sd
Tehouster said:
My quadrant dropped at 1100..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know this is a stupid quest but how can i know my scores? can some one show me how?
I am on Beta 4 and i get CONSTANT 1550 Quadrant scores.
I even installed the Data2SD addon which now gives me a constant 2550 (which im not entirely liking because theres a lot of fcs and the phone tends to freeze up a lot more, so im going to revert when i get my new one)
benz0076 said:
I used to have around 1500 with beta 4.
Recently i installed data2sd and this works like a charme.
I now get scores around 2500
Phone is stable only had 1 fc but that was right after the installation so i think the data wasn't setteld yet now it runs for 3 days wirh no problems at all.
Z you really rock...
Thanks for Xrecovery, your super roms and data2sd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey bro are you using the standard 16gb microsd that came with the phone? (class 2)
because i installed the data2sd addon and i feel like the phone freezes everytime i try to do something and hangs for a few seconds before allowing me to do anything :S
BULL3TPR00F said:
hey bro are you using the standard 16gb microsd that came with the phone? (class 2)
because i installed the data2sd addon and i feel like the phone freezes everytime i try to do something and hangs for a few seconds before allowing me to do anything :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try lass 10 then...
uicha said:
try lass 10 then...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks captain obvious....
not everyone is able to afford such luxuries...
im not about to pay $150+ for a class 6+ 16gb sd card...
Jesus I got my x10 for like 180 canadian lol..
uicha said:
i know this is a stupid quest but how can i know my scores? can some one show me how?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no body show me?
download Quadrant from the market
BULL3TPR00F said:
hey bro are you using the standard 16gb microsd that came with the phone? (class 2)
because i installed the data2sd addon and i feel like the phone freezes everytime i try to do something and hangs for a few seconds before allowing me to do anything :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the standard 8gb class 2 that came with the phone
BULL3TPR00F said:
thanks captain obvious....
not everyone is able to afford such luxuries...
im not about to pay $150+ for a class 6+ 16gb sd card...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont think so, i just bought the class 4 + 16gb just 24 from wallmart.. how can the class 6+16gb is 150$....imposible..!
Honestly as long as my phone is function efficantly, I'm happy. But my scores are about 1430 on Beta-4
i live in canada, everything is overpriced, even when our dollar is over or on par with the USD lol
no network acess in 2.2 beta 4 in my x10
can anyone help me with this problm?i already upgrade my x10 to froyo beta 4 but my phone keep the flight mode to turn on so i cannot make a call....somebody can fix this?i already reboot several times but it just still the same...already factory reset but nothing happen....help me...i have done:
1-reboot
2-factory reset
3-flash with 2.1 then to 2.2 again using xrecovery,nothing happen also...the problem still occur...
4-untick the flight mode,but the 'thick'cannot be remove...
any idea
Related
Does anyone feel like posting their benchmarks on the custom ROMs they are running? I know not every GTab will run the same but I would like to get a basic idea of what the hottest scores are. Thanks.
TNT Lite 4.3.x with stock kernel is ~40 fps (Nenamark) and ~2300 in Quadrant. On average.
There are definitely higher scores than that, with some of the other modded ROMs.
2200 with vegan 5.11 Benchmark Atuntu
Thank you guys for posting your benches. I had seen some one some where, posting that they get 60fps. Any one getting 60fps?
there is guide in dev forum where you can get up to 77fps, but the recomended is under 75.
You might mean the frame rate. The default is 50, but TNT Lite and gADAM up the frame rate to 60. At least one mod ups it to 77.
That's not really a benchmark, though - I assumed you meant something like Quadrant.
Im running caulkins rom and clemsyn's kernel #6. I'm averaging around 2400 on quadrant and 3000 on smartbench. The only thing faster on smartbench is overclocked xoom
It looks like most of the new ROMs run pretty fast. If i can get 2200-2500 in Quadrant I will be happy.
I get a little over 3000 qudrant
johnboyjr said:
I get a little over 3000 qudrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what ROM/mods you are running?
i got several scores in the 2400s today and one personal best of 2518.
@johnboyjr
Are you bull****'n? 3000? i havent seen anyone say they are hitting the 3000 mark. I'd like to know what you're running too. Did you overclock? I dont think i want to overclock mine.
nsmartinez79 said:
Im running caulkins rom and clemsyn's kernel #6. I'm averaging around 2400 on quadrant and 3000 on smartbench. The only thing faster on smartbench is overclocked xoom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same setup on my gtab... got 39.1 fps in nenamark, and 2399 in quadrant.
I just set my gtab up today so it doesn't have much on it yet.
There is a post in the development section by chengu that has a loopback fix that enhances read/write speeds on the internal SD. This makes the I/O part of quadrant way faster. I have posted on that thread vegan stock 10x average is 2500+. With the loopback fix its a 10x average of 3100 with peaks of 3333. So no its not BS but really how much do quadrant (or any other test) effect daily functionality.? It is great for bragging rights though, especially to xoomers.
Sent from my Chromatic Magic using XDA Premium App
Mantara said:
There is a post in the development section by chengu that has a loopback fix that enhances read/write speeds on the internal SD. This makes the I/O part of quadrant way faster. I have posted on that thread vegan stock 10x average is 2500+. With the loopback fix its a 10x average of 3100 with peaks of 3333. So no its not BS but really how much do quadrant (or any other test) effect daily functionality.? It is great for bragging rights though, especially to xoomers.
Sent from my Chromatic Magic using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mantara, do you still have the link for loopback fix? I could not find it .
Thanks a lot in advance.
njshkb said:
Mantara, do you still have the link for loopback fix? I could not find it .
Thanks a lot in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=902426
Fyi: restart your tab 5 or six times, I know I sounds weird but it takes that many to streamline it completely. Let it stabilize after boot and then power down, wait 20 sectonds and and power on. It wil take up to six minutes on first boot and get less each time.
It uses boot time to write changes.
Have fun ;-)
loopback fix like others have said
Is there any down fall to using the loop back fix? Heat issues or failure? Why isnt anyone implementing this into their ROMs?
No adverse side effects that I have noticed. Most people have noticed a slight increese in playing video from internal memory and web browsing cashed sights. Read the thread its full of good info.
Sent from my Chromatic Magic using XDA Premium App
Ok, so I just ran a linpack benchmark on my Aria and got the result of 8.903. I decided to save it since that was the highest I got. I went on the greencomputing website to see the best results for the Aria and the highest one was 32.62 mflops. I wonder if that is even possible on the Aria? If so, how do I get that rom/kernel which gets my that amount of speed. the guy had a dell streak rom and was clocked to 998.4 mHz. here is the link --- http://www.greenecomputing.com/apps/linpack/linpack-by-device/
just scroll down to HTC Aria/Liberty.
btw, I am running CM7 on my Aria.
Why do you want that much speed? 806 is fine. Speeds that high would toast the processor. And the phone would get hot so fast.
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
I know
andrew.cambridge said:
Why do you want that much speed? 806 is fine. Speeds that high would toast the processor. And the phone would get hot so fast.
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but I'm just wondering how that guy even got his phone to fully boot up at that processor speed. Also, I am wondering if his phone exploded after that. Really, How is that speed even possible? Also, if you look at other results in that list, you will see that people got it to work on 864 which is impossible for the CM7 kernel. So that really makes you wonder how...
Moved to General, since it's not a development thread.
JazzyCarr0t said:
I know but I'm just wondering how that guy even got his phone to fully boot up at that processor speed. Also, I am wondering if his phone exploded after that. Really, How is that speed even possible? Also, if you look at other results in that list, you will see that people got it to work on 864 which is impossible for the CM7 kernel. So that really makes you wonder how...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't really make me wonder... Here's the deal, that guy (or girl) has a hobby. His hobby is seeing how high he can get linpack for android to run. To accomplish this he can go about it one of two ways.
Either he took apart his aria, overclocked the hell out of it, added additional cooling and custom built an optimized kernel for 1 purpose - running linpack for android while unstable. (it's not a phone anymore)
A more logical approach would be to run linpack in an emulator, and spoof linpack into thinking it's running on an aria.
Hope this helps clear up some of the confusion.
He must of got into that girls pants he was trying to impress by having a super overclocked aria
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Works every time. ^^
LOL gotcha
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
wow..amazing what a dedicated person
Hi there. Why am i getting only about 1000 quadrant score, while everyone getting somewhat like 1500 on the same roms?
Do i have a different hardware or what?
Different roms will get you different results. Gingerbread roms appear to run around 1000+ while Froyo roms run closer to 1300+. Run it a few times and you should get a better score. Quadrant doesn't really matter too much though. What's important is how the phone feels for you not what a graphic tells you.
Thanks for reply, but the problem is that i'm having different results than people on the same rom.
And does the quadrant score affects on how smooth the games are running?
Do you have a lot of apps installed on your internal memory? The "cleaner" the phone is the more optimized. Junk apps will definitely decrease performance. As for running games, quadrant doesn't affect how smooth your game is running but does show performance measures that could be related to efficiencies of your phone. Theoretically, the higher the quadrant score the better your phone will be at running your games.
What file system are you using...quadrant takes your free space for apps in score consideration..
If your using data2sd and have 2gb for internal(ext2,3,4) then quadrant is going to show a better score than those on rfs.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
sopdogg said:
Do you have a lot of apps installed on your internal memory?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i have taken stats from fresh install, also tried different roms, but never got higher than 1000.
rudolf895
No, i am not using data2sd and i guess those people who get higher score than me not using it too.
Build.prop
Need to edit.
refer to reinderro's build thread, which I can't find now.
Sent from my Xperia Arc using XDA Premium App
Litaskull said:
rudolf895
No, i am not using data2sd and i guess those people who get higher score than me not using it too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok..
But my point was having lesser apps and having more. Internal space will increase the quadrant..
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
Which rom(s) are you using?
FYI - Fresh install of 2.1 will only get you around 500. JIT enabled gets you around 600+, removing additional junk apps will get you 700+. 2.2 Roms will get you over 1000+ easily. Z's Froyo beta 3 got me around 1500+. Others including Gingerbread hover around 900-1300.
I have tried CM7.0.3 J020c and trip's froyo.
In both roms my quadrant is about 1000, but for other people trip's rom giving them about 1400-1500.
I am on wolfbreaks rom..(as per my signature)
The only other thing i do is move all aps to the sd card that can be moved and leave the ones with widgets on my internal memory.
I average about 1450 to 1550 with my best score of 1609.
Run it a few times as well..
On J's rom I run around 900-1200. Never tried running quadrant on Trip's froyo but on his Arc rom I get around 1000-1250. Again, quadrant isn't that big of a deal. Your games will run fine on your phone. Remember, try to have more free internal memory and get rid of junk apps you don't need.
on wolfbreaks rom. i move all apps to the sd card (except widgets)
1300 - 1400
Okay, thank you, guys, quadrant isn't important, but it's kinda wierd that i'm having lower stats than other people.
Litaskull said:
Okay, thank you, guys, quadrant isn't important, but it's kinda wierd that i'm having lower stats than other people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not weird at all. Everyone has different apps and settings which affect benchmarks differently. Higher Quadrant scores don't neccessarily translate to better performance either so why does it matter. Also in order to get reliable scores in quadrant you need to run it twice in a row as the OS will kill apps and adjust as the test runs the first time and the second test is always higher and more consistent.
Sent From My *Super Fly X10*
If I (or anyone for that matter!) help you, dont be afraid to press THANKS!
Hello,
I've had the phone rooted and the new cm7 (bad***), it all runs great I just wonder how some people are getting 5k Quad score while I am at the same 3.2 as it was on stock. I do have the same Kernel and everything when rooting and flashing went so smooth. Is there something I am missing.......
Thanks in advance.
MyyH said:
Hello,
I've had the phone rooted and the new cm7 (bad***), it all runs great I just wonder how some people are getting 5k Quad score while I am at the same 3.2 as it was on stock. I do have the same Kernel and everything when rooting and flashing went so smooth. Is there something I am missing.......
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can overclock it to 1.6 ghz in the CM settings.
flucks said:
You can overclock it to 1.6 ghz in the CM settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did, than quadrant freezes while I'm running it. As in when I click submit score, it automatically goes back to the 1st 2d test and than force closes.
"sorry I left that out" :/
call me ignorant but do people STILL think that quadrant scores mean soemthing? why are people still comparing them???
Some people just want to stroke their epeen on the net.
And as to overclocking - not everyone will be able to overclock. There's a reason the device is only sold as 1.2 GHz - that's all it was tested to. Some might hit 1.4, some might hit 1.6, some might be right at the edge and only be able to do 1.2.
its not the quadrant score that matters. Its the idea of why it is different. All the devices have the same cpu have the same kernel and are rooted/flashed as stated in the forum (the same way). So why is mine doing so when clocked and running. I don't care what the score is. even 1200 score is enough for a phone. I didn't want to stroke anything. Its the matter of where the problem/case/scenario is coming from. As in, will it cause other problems and is it a problem at all. having had 5 android rooted/flashed devices I've never experienced it........... Why do people have to be ignorant and troll a forum is an issue I cant understand?
Bump for help
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Cm7 rooted love it
MyyH said:
its not the quadrant score that matters. Its the idea of why it is different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you're asking why your quad score differs from other ppl's phone with the same setup, then you need to research more.
Not all phones are built the same. Just because they all have the same hardware and software, doesnt mean they'll all operate the same.
hi
sory for my poor english
i root my archos 101IT, 2.4.19+R/W chulri method, everythings is ok, except that i realized a slowdown in internal storage transfer rate.
i didnt remove android kernel to make some tests and to compare when i boot from android and from developer (root)
example
when i boot from android (not root) i took 20seg to load angry birds
when i boot from developer (root) i took 60seg to load angry birds
i did alots benchmarks, not problem with mem, cpu, 2d or 3d
but when bench the internal storage i got 4MB/s in read
when i boot from android (not root) i got 10MB/s
someone know why this happens?
thanxs
Please compare it also with the non-rw version, there is a tiny but maybe important difference implement compared to the +rw version.
bump?
Chulri, I to have a noticeable performance difference after I root. I don't really mind to much bc I'd rather have root. Would you like bench mark results or anything? I have an archos 70 hit.
Let me know.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Lags and frreezes alot.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Can you please post some benchmarks between stock, non-rw and +rw? Thank you very much!
chulri said:
Can you please post some benchmarks between stock, non-rw and +rw? Thank you very much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never really did any benches before on either stock or rooted.
i used a few different bench apps, all have better results with root EXCEPT for SDcard read. as you can see in the bench 'write' falls around 20-21 on both stock, and rooted.
read was averaging 21-22 on stock and only 6-10 on rooted.
i believe that could cause it to run slower.
what good are better bench results if the system has to wait on reading the disk...
As I asked before, could you please bench the non-rw vs. the +rw root version? Thank you.
I guess I know what's the problem and unfortunately there won't be a quick fix
chulri said:
As I asked before, could you please bench the non-rw vs. the +rw root version? Thank you.
I guess I know what's the problem and unfortunately there won't be a quick fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok.
ill get back to you as soon as i can.