Related
Last night I was following a thread entitled Nitroz Extreme, this morning it has gone.
What has happened?
greigster said:
Last night I was following a thread entitled Nitroz Extreme, this morning it has gone.
What has happened?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering the same? Last i saw the author was updating it to 1.1 Now.. it's just gone? Was there some conflict involved?
jayesh said:
I was wondering the same? Last i saw the author was updating it to 1.1 Now.. it's just gone? Was there some conflict involved?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe ... some guys complained that when the thread has been opened the ROM was not released.
Err that was resolved. The Author deleted the original thread and created a new one. Something else went down.
jayesh said:
Err that was resolved. The Author deleted the original thread and created a new one. Something else went down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where is the new one
There was even talk of 1.2 and 1.3 with high density dpi screen.... I was waiting for it to be released.. but now the entire thread is gone.
Found this link though: http://androidheadlines.com/2011/07/rom-nitrozk-nitroz-extreme-v1-1-for-samsung-galaxy-s2-i9100.html
Yeah where is the thread??? I was waiting for 1.2 rom
Any comments?? Nitro??
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
He took the first thread down without an explanation which was pretty rude. If he has taken down the second thread without leaving an explanation....now that would be inexcusable. It does not take much to leave a post explaining the reasons rather than leaving people high and dry.
Though he seems to be enjoying this rom. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=15284823&postcount=3759
Perhaps he is out partying and spending his donations
Why be so quick to automatically assume the worst in people? He probably took it down for a reason and I assume it will be back up soon. I followed the thread closely and there didn't seem to be any problems/turmoil.
Exidrion said:
Why be so quick to automatically assume the worst in people? He probably took it down for a reason and I assume it will be back up soon. I followed the thread closely and there didn't seem to be any problems/turmoil.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont have a problem with him taking the thread down..........just his bad manners by not leaving an explanation
greigster said:
He took the first thread down without an explanation which was pretty rude. If he has taken down the second thread without leaving an explanation....now that would be inexcusable. It does not take much to leave a post explaining the reasons rather than leaving people high and dry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason he took his first thread down was because of the pathetic prepubescents who were complaining about a lack of progress, late ETAs and other such stuff. He took it well and even apologised - something the majority of posters on that thread didn't deserve - in fact most deserved a slap.
His ROM - he can do what he likes with it, AFAIK. "Pretty rude"?? Live with it. The high and dry people can always choose another ROM. Or make their own....
What about the people who donated so that he could keep developing, read his sig...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
i must say I consider it rude not to at least leave a message as to why its been deleted. That said having posted mods and a rom myself over the years the public exceptions are very high and ask alot from the cook. I know that 1.1 did not go smoothly..... maybe he could not be arsed?
B3311 said:
The reason he took his first thread down was because of the pathetic prepubescents who were complaining about a lack of progress, late ETAs and other such stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this a fact or have you just made this up. Where did you read this?
And those that donated towards the further advancement of the rom will perhaps think twice before giving money again to him.
what a pr*ck, i donated £20 to him!!
hate people like him...
The guy honestly doesn't seem like a prick at all, so it's either coming back with a bang or he can't be bothered anymore. That's his decision. Personally I would only donate to a dev after they've shown commitment in the way of releases. This was only at 1.1.
greigster said:
Is this a fact or have you just made this up. Where did you read this?
And those that donated towards the further advancement of the rom will perhaps think twice before giving money again to him.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read it on said thread, I'm not making it up. TBH, I can't remember if he pulled it himself or the mods did.
And I hadn't thought of those who donated (still trying to set up a Paypal account myself without wife's knowledge.. ).
My bad, apologies.
RizSher said:
There was even talk of 1.2 and 1.3 with high density dpi screen.... I was waiting for it to be released.. but now the entire thread is gone.
Found this link though: http://androidheadlines.com/2011/07/rom-nitrozk-nitroz-extreme-v1-1-for-samsung-galaxy-s2-i9100.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
High density resolution ? This is a great thing, like hyperdroid ?
I hope that nitro will keep threads and will communicate better because it is not a good way to do
B3311 said:
I read it on said thread, I'm not making it up. TBH, I can't remember if he pulled it himself or the mods did.
And I hadn't thought of those who donated (still trying to set up a Paypal account myself without wife's knowledge.. ).
My bad, apologies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No probs matey, big of you to apologise.
We all have differing views.
Good luck with the paypal.
Yes I know wrong section. But this absolutely MUST go out to as many kernel devs as possible. I see alot of kernel activity today, and im just saying. BFS + dual core...
You even state its the wrong thread. Shame on you.
If you need it, make it.
we need members to post in correct areas!
Questions or Problems Should Not Be Posted in the Development Forum
Please Post in the Correct Forums
Moving to General
"Alot of kernel activity..." ???
All I see is bnice's added today...
Glad to see his bc as far as kernels go we have been lacking lately. Remember in evo4g after source is out net and others would b on top of it within a week and have ton of stuff added.
Spoiled back then I guess. LOL
But to ur point about BFS, I tried those so many times and the battery like effect was never worth the slight performance bump over using cfs. Just my opinion on it.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
jeez guys... take it easy.
lol.
just a desperate plea for BFS.
I love the theory in BFS but CFS just feels far faster (and more immediate) IMHO.
Yuck, no we don't.
BFS has always produced terrible results on phones-- that usually result in very strange issues and battery problems. CFS all the way.
freeza said:
Yuck, no we don't.
BFS has always produced terrible results on phones-- that usually result in very strange issues and battery problems. CFS all the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+100000.
Maybe we can mark the "end of an era" here on XDA, when there officially are NO more silly BFS kernels worked on by Devs or even, possibly, demanded by users. These kernels were begun to be produced originally because of users' strange fixation on the 5% of "missing" battery life they were "getting screwed out of" every time they unplugged after a full charge.
The appropriate reaction by developers over the first complaint of this years ago SHOULD have been "so what? It's 5%. That's actually a safety feature that's there to protect your battery and to make sure you don't burn down your house.... ".
Why the whole "BFS!-here's-a kernel-that-will-keep-charging-that battery-until-it-glows-or-explodes" thing ever became a thing in the first place is beyond me.
Cmon guys... Here's our chance.
Edit:
I win the idiot award for this fantastic piece of work. I'm SO leaving it up, though... lol.
mazook98 said:
+100000.
Maybe we can mark the "end of an era" here on XDA, when there officially are NO more silly BFS kernels worked on by Devs or even, possibly, demanded by users. These kernels were begun to be produced originally because of users' strange fixation on the 5% of "missing" battery life they were "getting screwed out of" every time they unplugged after a full charge.
The appropriate reaction by developers over the first complaint of this years ago SHOULD have been "so what? It's 5%. That's actually a safety feature that's there to protect your battery and to make sure you don't burn down your house.... ".
Why the whole "BFS!-here's-a kernel-that-will-keep-charging-that battery-until-it-glows-or-explodes" thing ever became a thing in the first place is beyond me.
Cmon guys... Here's our chance.
<<This space for rent>>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..... You mean SBC.
COME ON, Zook... I would hope you know the difference between the SBC (superior battery charging) kernels and the BFS (Brain F*ck scheduler).
....COME ON!!
felacio said:
..... You mean SBC.
COME ON, Zook... I would hope you know the difference between the SBC (superior battery charging) kernels and the BFS (Brain F*ck scheduler).
....COME ON!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+100000
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
This is soooo funny.. ppl trying to write smart articles about BFS, without even knowing what it is hahaha.... F*ckin funny!
- Coz i just saw it in 3D with the Shooter -
dashrink said:
This is soooo funny.. ppl trying to write smart articles about BFS, without even knowing what it is hahaha.... F*ckin funny!
- Coz i just saw it in 3D with the Shooter -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit.... didn't have my coffee when I wrote this.
Congrats Mo on 602!
dashrink said:
This is soooo funny.. ppl trying to write smart articles about BFS, without even knowing what it is hahaha.... F*ckin funny!
- Coz i just saw it in 3D with the Shooter -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha... Sorry guys... I just woke up and saw my fatal error...
Go ahead, yuk it up..., (I would)...
Anyway, I read the OP wrong, obviously...
I was talking about an SBC kernel...
(That concept, I know I'm against, by definition.)
And I am familiar with the concepts of BFS/CFS... Honestly, though, I could never tell much of a difference between the two when using different variations of the same kernel on my EVO4G.... (I've got a CFS kernel with CM7 in there right now, I believe, that's never given me issues, though.
So, once again, sorry for the goof, sorry to the OP because my opinion was misguided..
I didn't read it correctly, and thought I knew what I was talking about.
Ps, thanks Chef, for taking up for me though, but, while I definitely know more about Android than I did a year ago, I still am learning every day, and that's because of everyone else that's here every day too.
Thanks for keeping me in check, fellas.
<<This space for rent>>
I was totally just flipping you **** zook. Lol. I figured you where sleepy.. or drunk or something haha.
we need less wikipedia-search inspired technical threads.
cobraboy85 said:
we need less wikipedia-search-inspired technical threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I thought BFS was a British sports cable tv station.
Congrats Mo on 602!
cobraboy85 said:
we need less wikipedia-search-inspired technical threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chefdave12118 said:
I agree. I thought BFS was a British sports cable tv station.
Congrats Mo on 602!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here is the WikiPedia listings for BFS in case anyone is curious..
i personally like this one: BFS, a revival of the 1970s British band Blackfoot Sue
thats what we are looking for in a kernel right?? the revival of the 1970s British Band Blackfoot Sue.. yeah.. that sounds about right.. please devs give us some more Blackfoot Sue in our kernels.. please
pstevep said:
here is the WikiPedia listings for BFS in case anyone is curious..
i personally like this one: BFS, a revival of the 1970s British band Blackfoot Sue
thats what we are looking for in a kernel right?? the revival of the 1970s British Band Blackfoot Sue.. yeah.. that sounds about right.. please devs give us some more Blackfoot Sue in our kernels.. please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahhhhh... touche.
Congrats Mo on 602!
chefdave12118 said:
Ahhhhh... touche.
Congrats Mo on 602!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
honestly i thought it sounded like a british sports channel.. but i had to post some sort of sarcastic comment.. wikipedia - inspired techincal threads.. silly..
Hi All
Is it possible for any DEV to fix the USSD Problem in Photon.
I have looked into many threads and nothing helped.
Seems like there is some patch which needs to be applied
hunderteins said:
TL;DR: It works for me. Try it. If it works, good for you.
I patched libril-qc-1.so in a way, that it sends a fixed length of 32 bytes instead of 4. (position 0xa8fc2).
Good luck,
hunderteins
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Problem running ussd code
USSD fix for 4xx based roms
Gingerbread and USSD QuD fix
+1
Not a questions forum
Sent from the back of a MoPhoKing AOKPDB
bullfrog527 said:
Not a questions forum
Sent from the back of a MoPhoKing AOKPDB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might as well be, no one listens.
+1
Sent not from your device!
Omg. Are you kidding? I know about this fix at least one month. And try to hex edit our ril, even if I don't know where to search, even when I don't need ussd, searched in the framework too and probably this fix is not our problem.
I lost few hours with searching for this problem.
Did you try to fix it?
sukhdeepsinghkohli said:
Hi All
Is it possible for any DEV to fix the USSD Problem in Photon.
I have looked into many threads and nothing helped.
Seems like there is some patch which needs to be applied
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jam97 said:
+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bullfrog527 said:
Not a questions forum
Sent from the back of a MoPhoKing AOKPDB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Acvice said:
Might as well be, no one listens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ryan8r said:
+1
Sent not from your device!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently folks are not bothering to read the forum guidelines yet again and could obviously care less. This has gotten completely out of hand so on that note I give you the following...
Camel+straw=back injury
(I will no longer be releasing or maintaining anything on xda until this BS stops)
While it is annoying, there are probably 100 good users to every bad one. So all hope is not lost. All we really need is moderators that actually frequent these forums to enforce the rules. It's not the userbases responsibility to report things and hope the mods do something. It's the mods responsibility to do the job they were given.
You know this **** is getting out of hand when important devs can't stand to be here anymore. Sorry Loki :/
Acvice said:
While it is annoying, there are probably 100 good users to every bad one. So all hope is not lost. All we really need is moderators that actually frequent these forums to enforce the rules. It's not the userbases responsibility to report things and hope the mods do something. It's the mods responsibility to do the job they were given.
You know this **** is getting out of hand when important devs can't stand to be here anymore. Sorry Loki :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing that both my primary and two backup drives failed today it's a moot point now, at least for me. I lost everything as far back as my custom PalmOS ROM days. Been fun guys.
Lokifish Marz said:
Seeing that both my primary and two backup drives failed today it's a moot point now, at least for me. I lost everything as far back as my custom PalmOS ROM days. Been fun guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been a tech for years and have literally never seen three HD's die in rapid succession like that... Mother of God...
It's been a pleasure getting to use your work Loki. Hope to see you back around here sometime. Till then, take care.
wow, sorry about that Loki. Hope things get better. Your work has been appreciated by many here
Sent from my MoPhoKing AOKPCB
I had my hopes up seeing the heading..
Wow you just come to a dev section n post a question.. that too with a thumbs up sign as if u cracked it? I too want it fixed, but this is not right buddy.
Acvice said:
I've been a tech for years and have literally never seen three HD's die in rapid succession like that... Mother of God...
It's been a pleasure getting to use your work Loki. Hope to see you back around here sometime. Till then, take care.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multiple pre-failures on primary (SMART monitor lit up like a christmas tree), must save data, grab backup (I have pets) hard impact with hardwood floor, grab second backup and in my haste plug directly into wall and (cue power surge) smoke not figuratively but literally. Three hard drives in about five minutes.
The only time I've ever seen multiple drives go at once was a voltage controller for the pci slots short and take out a RAID5 array in one stroke.
Well anyways, I will eventually get up and running but at this time it's really not a priority. Thanks to those that have donated and supported photon development and my work.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1223352&page=4
In the developer options I accidentally set window animation scale to off and now its greyed out and I can't get it back. Am I skrewed or is there some way to re-enable it ?
can i just replace development.apk with the one from the rezrom s4 zip and get it working again ?
**** you, **** you, **** you, you're cool, and **** you, I'm out!
Lol...You should just have to turn animations back on under the same menu or under Display settings.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Budderbear said:
**** you, **** you, **** you, you're cool, and **** you, I'm out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, waited a whole 35 mins for an answer...
mjones73 said:
Wow, waited a whole 35 mins for an answer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously this kid must have drove his parents nuts on family car rides, "are we there yet" are we there yet???"
lmao
... and to the OP.
how the hell are you even rooted if you can't check and uncheck a tweak
again, lmao
^ can you take a joke from a stoner movie ? wow some uptight ones here. And I'm rooted because I have a general knowledge for technology and it comes easy to me. I've been working on computers since I was ten and been rooted my smart phones since the g1. Its not my fault if there is a bug or glitch in the rom that permanently disables animations and grays them out. Its not something I can simply check or uncheck and your a moron if you think otherwise. Would you like me to do replicate the problem for you with a zip file of the broken rom that you can flash and prove to yourself ? Btw go smoke a joint and relax.... everyone knows phones are some serious business
and perhaps thats why and answer was never given, because there isn't one ? So rather then say "hey sorry can't help ya" you all feel the need to cut someone else down because your too stupid to fix his problem either. Its been my past experience that if an answer to something that only one person is having trouble with is not answered in a short time that it probably won't be answered. Most non d1ck [email protected]$ on other forums would have just told me to restore a nandroid backup or reflash the rom but I'm so glad I asked you geniuses first. O and "Accepted NOT Expected" no $hit there accepted if you have a donate button =P
If any one you where actually smart enough to read the op you would see that I asked how to turn the animation SCALE back on. I can turn animations on and off just fine but ANIMATION SCALE got GREYED out and now its is stuck that way.
What's cursing and flaming going to solve
You do understand that no one will answer you with an attitude like that?
Anyway have fun with your problem
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
and andybones you need to check yourself because you ain't $h1t in the real development world. Its not hard to make roms its hard to make them flawless as you can see with my problems. So before you think you can talk down on people just because you have nothing better to do with your life then play with your phone at home... go get a real job ... and no I'm not talking a high paying cushy 6 figure look at me job, I mean something that actually contributes to society since your clearly not doing that hear.
Want a better answer next time? Post the rom your running
Ask in the thread dedicated to your rom possibly
Wait patiently because it's not immediately that someone who wants to help comes by
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
subject oyclean
in b4 someone brings up smarts and my typing skills as if english is everyones first language
superchilpil said:
Want a better answer next time? Post the rom your running
Ask in the thread dedicated to your rom possibly
Wait patiently because it's not immediately that someone who wants to help comes by
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can no one here read ? It says in the second post RezRom S4, and maybe if I could I would have posted in my roms sections but the way this forums are setup I can't do that, now can I ? Unless If I just go around spamming every thread just to get my post count up then I could
the way this thread seems to be going though I can just stay here and get my post count up
Budderbear said:
Can no one here read ? It says in the second post RezRom S4, and maybe if I could I would have posted in my roms sections but the way this forums are setup I can't do that, now can I ? Unless If I just go around spamming every thread just to get my post count up then I could
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude nevermind, this thread has been reported
Check in display settings and check your attitude
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
superchilpil said:
What's cursing and flaming going to solve
You do understand that no one will answer you with an attitude like that?
Anyway have fun with your problem
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kinda hard to check my attitude when people cut you down over a simple question and when people keep posting stupid answers as if there obvious. Go ahead and report me all you want ahahahahah, wow so i get banned do you see my post count ? do you think I would really care, do you think I'm not using an anonymous proxy server and I can't just change my ip address and be right back on the site? Also you a coward, you post something wait for a reply then edit your post ? You just say before you edited your post " Just look in display settings " your an idiot if you think I haven't already done that LMFAO its the ANIMATION SCALE NOT JUST THE ANIMATIONS
no one is answering me anyways because no one can because it is a bug that just cant be fixed without the developers implementing it, or me going in and fixing it myself
Dude nevermind, this thread has been reported
Check in display settings and check your attitude
ahh here it is, got changed back ahahaha. "check in display settings" wow einstein didn't know there was animation scale settings there.... hahaha
Maybe you should go smoke a joint and chill the hell out instead of ranting on like a lunatic if you want help... You have enough posts to go post in the RezRom thread after your ranting here, go post your bug there.
To Enable/Disable Fast Dormancy on ICS add the appropriate line to your build.prop. build.prop can be found in system/app folder. To edit just press on build.prop and then edit with a text editor. Place the edit at the very bottom of your build.prop.
Enable: ro.ril.fast.dormancy.rule=1
Disable: ro.ril.fast.dormancy.rule=0
You do not add the word Enable:/Disable: just add ro.ril.fast.dormancy.rule=#
I know I already posted this on another thread but a lot of people (not all) do not read the threads but still wanna know the fix so I thought it would be easier to start another thread and put it in the first post so nobody has to search for an answer. Fast Dormancy is believed to save battery life when disabled.
Just to make sure... I want it enabled... right?
JohnnyQ1964 said:
Just to make sure... I want it enabled... right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disabled for better battery life.
Why can't we just get a simple on or off
Sent from my Transformer Prime using XDA Premium HD app
dude6595 said:
Why can't we just get a simple on or off
Sent from my Transformer Prime using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because of carrier support. If they use it, they assume you want it on. Its a networking implementation for traffic control.
Sent from my SGH-I717R using xda premium
Eun-Hjzjined said:
Because of carrier support. If they use it, they assume you want it on. Its a networking implementation for traffic control.
Sent from my SGH-I717R using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand that....need a list cause one person says one thing and then another says something different about the same carrier
Sent from my Transformer Prime using XDA Premium HD app
How about a explanation of what it exactly is! Rather then post 2 build props...so a user has an idea what it is????
wish777 said:
How about a explanation of what it exactly is! Rather then post 2 build props...so a user has an idea what it is????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, my name is Google Search. I'm new around here... we should hang out sometime!
http://www.computerworld.com/s/arti...martphone_networking_and_battery_performance_
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=US&ie=UTF-8&source=android-browser&q=fast+dormancy
wish777 said:
How about a explanation of what it exactly is! Rather then post 2 build props...so a user has an idea what it is????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause I assume with all the threads about Fast Dormancy on XDA and many other sites most people have heard of it and know what it is used for. I can give an explanation but you can also ask for an explanation or simply do a google search. Here is a link about Fast Dormancy that gets strait to the point about why people wanna use this feature on the I717 Note. Read the last paragraph.
http://www.wirecast.org/r/awesome-product-highly-recommended/9924.xml
I know what it is.. but as you see you had a member ask if its supposed to be enabled or disabled...it just helps a little more when making threads to perhaps explain what it is.. or what it could do..Just helps the inexperienced users to learn..
dude6595 said:
Why can't we just get a simple on or off
Sent from my Transformer Prime using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On Android 2.#.# there is a few simple way to turn it on and off but on ICS its not as simple. I'm thinking about making a script so that it can be turned on and off at anytime.
Just thought I might add, the "huge battery improvements" have no credibility for the most part unless screen on times are included. 60+ hours means nothing if you're only getting like 2 or 3 hours of screen on time. OP or whoever has done this build prop edit should run a few tests with and without it enabled and show the great increase in screen on time, or most people will continue to be confused about this.
That being said, I can see where it can increase standby battery life, but I doubt that it makes much of a difference in screen on time, which is what matters most to anybody who has a charger on hand every night.
*******edit******** meant to post this in the bounty thread about fast dormancy where the op hasn't done anything but complain and make ridiculous claims without much proof.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
so I have made ridiculous claims with no proof huh..... and I have just complained. Well a big kiss my booty to you.
Please look here mr positivity starting with post 821. Then read post 823, 826, 827, 831 and more to come.
I will say it again, it works for me in my every day use. The pattern is the same and before it was 8 to 12 hours now its up to 30. If you don't believe it then dont bother with disabling it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1669170&page=83
Suzook1 said:
so I have made ridiculous claims with no proof huh..... and I have just complained. Well a big kiss my booty to you.
Please look here mr positivity starting with post 821. Then read post 823, 826, 827, 831 and more to come.
I will say it again, it works for me in my every day use. The pattern is the same and before it was 8 to 12 hours now its up to 30. If you don't believe it then dont bother with disabling it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1669170&page=83
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, no, you still haven't shown anything regarding screen on time, which is arguably the best indicator of battery life. My note could get 30 hours bone stock if I barely used it. I get about 14-15 hours with almost 4 hours of screen on time in a usual day, and haven't touched fast dormancy. Show me your 30 hours with 4 hours of screen on time, and I'll eat my words.
In the mean time, you should probably grow up a little, as we like to keep things mature and civil around here. Also, you should probably get on with paying that 25 dollar bounty you posted; its only fair to porkenheimer and the guy who unbricked you.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
ok here we go... first I have nothing I need to prove to you. My every day use is generally the same. Prior to FD being disabled, I would get a total of 12 to 15 hours of batter between charges. Now its 30 hours plus. Thats good enough for me and anyone else who cares.
Secondly, I dont know of many phones (especially this size) that four hours plus of continuous on screen time is going to get there.
as for the bounty, I ask for a dev to come up with a solution and I will gladly split it between the two. But I find it funny that you and so many truly doubt its value so does that mean they really deserve a bounty.
And I might remind you, I am grown up but you were the first to make baseless accusations in a thread I wasnt even a participant in. Talk about an unfair fight or is that your M.O.
ta ta
P.S. do some thread searching on me. The same results were posted (even better) when I had my international note
P.S.S. purely ridiculous what goes on over trying to extend our battery life. You would think we are debating world peace. up...tight.........
I will once again charge over night and run a FULL cycle and then post. If you eat or dont eat I could care less but at least others can decide for themselves
Suzook1 said:
ok here we go... first I have nothing I need to prove to you. My every day use is generally the same. Prior to FD being disabled, I would get a total of 12 to 15 hours of batter between charges. Now its 30 hours plus. Thats good enough for me and anyone else who cares.
Secondly, I dont know of many phones (especially this size) that four hours plus of continuous on screen time is going to get there.
as for the bounty, I ask for a dev to come up with a solution and I will gladly split it between the two. But I find it funny that you and so many truly doubt its value so does that mean they really deserve a bounty.
And I might remind you, I am grown up but you were the first to make baseless accusations in a thread I wasnt even a participant in. Talk about an unfair fight or is that your M.O.
ta ta
P.S. do some thread searching on me. The same results were posted (even better) when I had my international note
P.S.S. purely ridiculous what goes on over trying to extend our battery life. You would think we are debating world peace. up...tight.........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, you have said nothing about your screen on time with it enabled vs. disabled. For all anybody knows, you just got more conscious about conserving battery once you have it disabled on a device, and a little conservation can go a long ways in improving standby time if you have very little screen on time. Screenshots prove legitimate improvements of screen on time, of which, you have provided none. You can say your battery life increased as much as you want, but unless that screen on time improves, you haven't said much. And if you would have read my first post, I meant to post it in your thread but made a mistake. My intention wasn't to go behind your back. And as far as I'm concerned, my accusations are more based in fact from my experience with my past two androids and their forums regarding battery life than your claims of ridiculous battery life are. Screen on time matters because your screen is on when you're using your phone. Anybody who lives in a modern city with access to a power outlet could give a hoot about your standby time increasing, as that's most likely the case. And about the bounty, somebody did come up with a solution. And people question the legitimacy because they haven't seen solid, set in stone, improvements that are proven...hell, most people don't know what it is.
All I asked for was some screen time values, and a comparison of enabled vs. disabled with respect to screen time, that is all. You can either oblige, or I guess I'll try it myself. No need to argue and clutter up porkenhimer's thread.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I am not going to oblige you. I think you are perfectly capable of running your own test. If you feel what I have given so far is inconclusive, bogus or usefulness to everyone else then your entitled to that opinion. This is still a place where others can try the same course I took and if they get a result then great. if they dont then its a failure.
But your decision to deride it unless it has an a-b is just that, another accusations. I have said at least three or four time for me I have seen major increases in the time between charges. Perhaps your basis of "we all know putting on a charger every night" is the sole argument why you think this isnt valid. Again, others are free to decide not you.
Thats it for me folks. Carry welchertc all you want but I think from my perspective I have said all I care to address with you.
Suzook1 said:
I am not going to oblige you. I think you are perfectly capable of running your own test. If you feel what I have given so far is inconclusive, bogus or usefulness to everyone else then your entitled to that opinion. This is still a place where others can try the same course I took and if they get a result then great. if they dont then its a failure.
But your decision to deride it unless it has an a-b is just that, another accusations. I have said at least three or four time for me I have seen major increases in the time between charges. Perhaps your basis of "we all know putting on a charger every night" is the sole argument why you think this isnt valid. Again, others are free to decide not you.
Thats it for me folks. Carry welchertc all you want but I think from my perspective I have said all I care to address with you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to take sides here but I have seen a small increase but too its only been a few hours and not a full battery run down...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
no sides to take mate. Try it and if it works great, if not you can easily turn it back on
I'll just be blunt and ask: what was your screen-on time during the 30 hours?
Screenshots would be cool, too.
I'm genuinely curious!