Galaxy S Plus
This seems to use the same hardware as our Galaxy S phones, does this mean we can possibly hit 1.4Ghz?
Overclocking doesn't always help your phone, but heats up the battery and it is possible that battery to be exploded(well, thats 1.6)
There aren't even stable 1.3ghz out yet, so we would have to wait and see.
We can get to 1.2GhZ already and it honestly doesn't make a difference in day to day usage except that your battery life will drop a good bit.
Can we get to 1.4? Maybe.
Is the hummingbird super finicky at anything over 1.2? Yep.
Could this be a slightly revised chip? Probably.
Is there much benefit?
Not really.
bobloblaw1 said:
We can get to 1.2GhZ already and it honestly doesn't make a difference in day to day usage except that your battery life will drop a good bit.
Can we get to 1.4? Maybe.
Is the hummingbird super finicky at anything over 1.2? Yep.
Could this be a slightly revised chip? Probably.
Is there much benefit?
Not really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ITs a different prossesor all together
GS+ = 1.4GHz Qualcomm MSM8255T chip
fascinate= Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110 (ARM Cortex A8), 1 GHz
Well then, thats out the window now isn't it
lambi1982 said:
Well then, thats out the window now isn't it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure we will see more then 1.2 ghz. I module overclock mine to 1.3 with a 1.2 kernel. And never any issues. Every phone is different and I can't even tell a drop in battery. I get over 48 hours per charge with regular usage. Plus I think one of the devs are working on 1.1-1.6ghz kernels as we speak.......... its all about voltages clock speeds and the right phone. Alot is possible with the right combo.
There was an old 1.6 voodoo rom a million years ago. I ran 1.3 till froyo hit now im at 1.2
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
dalrym05 said:
I'm sure we will see more then 1.2 ghz. I module overclock mine to 1.3 with a 1.2 kernel. And never any issues. Every phone is different and I can't even tell a drop in battery. I get over 48 hours per charge with regular usage. Plus I think one of the devs are working on 1.1-1.6ghz kernels as we speak.......... its all about voltages clock speeds and the right phone. Alot is possible with the right combo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trade phones with me. Ill post shipping.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
disclaimer: i personally think overclocking on high end phones is pointless...see my rant on uncutandroid for that though
anyway the other sgs phones all have 1.4 ghz oc kernels...so the processor is capable of it certainly...the nexus has 1.5 kernels, but thats on a .35 and gingerbread
so its certainly possible that those who *need* to overclock that high will be happy when nem has had more than a week to spend with kernel source
nitsuj17 said:
disclaimer: i personally think overclocking on high end phones is pointless...see my rant on uncutandroid for that though
anyway the other sgs phones all have 1.4 ghz oc kernels...so the processor is capable of it certainly...the nexus has 1.5 kernels, but thats on a .35 and gingerbread
so its certainly possible that those who *need* to overclock that high will be happy when nem has had more than a week to spend with kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you on the reason that its pointless overclocking high end phones. I've had an Evo, Epic, Droid 2, Droid X, and now the Fascinate. Overclocking and quadrant scores are pointless to me because its already freaking fast enough.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Daswolven said:
Trade phones with me. Ill post shipping.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No thanks. I got lucky j guess. My other one isn't to bad itself.
Related
I found this link to a working kernel hidden in the "Port Captivate Froyo" thread. It allows limited Overclocking up to 1.2 GHZ. Others (including myself) have applied this via Clockwork and it is working great. I by no means take any credit for this. Just trying to put the info out there.
http://www.mediafire.com/?byby91bhdm1b8l5 (Released 10/4/2010)
Credits:
(1) jt1134 for compiling the kernel.
(2) geeknik for posting downloadable link in port captivate thread.
(3) daswolven for being the guinea pig for the rest of us too scared to flash without confirmation.
Note:
jt1134 said, "Be aware its still experimental and issues may exist. Dont use the ondemand governor whatever you do, and be careful if using setcpu profiles."
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd at 1.2 GHZ
bendbowden said:
I found this link to a working kernel hidden in the "Port Captivate Froyo" thread. It allows limited Overclocking up to 1.2 GHZ. Others (including myself) have applied this via Clockwork and it is working great. I by no means take any credit for this. Just trying to put the info out there.
http://www.mediafire.com/?byby91bhdm1b8l5 (Released 10/4/2010)
Credits:
(1) jt1134 for compiling the kernel.
(2) geeknik for posting downloadable link in port captivate thread.
(3) daswolven for being the guinea pig for the rest of us too scared to flash without confirmation.
Note:
jt1134 said, "Be aware its still experimental and issues may exist. Dont use the ondemand governor whatever you do, and be careful if using setcpu profiles."
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd at 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What governor should I use? Interactive? Do I even need SetCPU? I don't want to change anything but the max clock speed if I don't. I find that it scales itself really well. Plus I don't wanna lose a lot of battery life.
GoogleAndroid said:
What governor should I use? Do I even need SetCPU? I don't want to change anything but the max clock speed if I don't. I find that it scales itself really well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use SetCPU. Min 200 Max 1200 Conservative. I believe Daswolven and others are using these same settings. You may have to clear cache for SetCPU if you already have it installed. jt said do not use ondemand. Performance also seems to be working fine.
bendbowden said:
I use SetCPU. Min 200 Max 1200 Conservative. I believe Daswolven and others are using these same settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I will then. Is there a noticeable speed difference? I'm copying now but I wanna hear from someone who's using it.
jt said leave on conservative for now and that he isn't 100% on profiles either done seem to be running them ok but that's what's been said
Sent from my Clockwork Fascinate using XDA App
GoogleAndroid said:
I guess I will then. Is there a noticeable speed difference? I'm copying now but I wanna hear from someone who's using it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I loaded this kernel last night its pretty sweet. no issues runs really smooth so far. I have left it on conservative also, overall seems alot snappier. No battery issues yet, actually bout the same.
I have noticed a difference. Im getting slightly better Quadrant scores. My phone seems a bit snappier. Its definately a start.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Definitely a good start. How about heat? Increased temps?
bendbowden said:
I have noticed a difference. Im getting slightly better Quadrant scores. My phone seems a bit snappier. Its definately a start.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from around mid to upper 870's to between 910 to 950
GoogleAndroid said:
Definitely a good start. How about heat? Increased temps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None that I have noticed. Will report back.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
2609 on Quadrant :O
Everything sped up. I'm impressed.
WillisD said:
I went from around mid to upper 870's to between 910 to 950
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Last score 949.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
GoogleAndroid said:
2609 on Quadrant :O
Everything sped up. I'm impressed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? How?
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
bendbowden said:
What? How?
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lag fix, and this kernel. The lag fix has made a noticeable difference in performance. Not on Quadrant, just doing anything. So I like to use it.
bendbowden said:
What? How?
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
probably lag-fixed
Kudos and thumbs-up to JT1134!!!
The ONLY drawback I've seen to this kernel is a slightly accelerated battery drain. Still way better than when i was running stock with Lookout...
JT1134 and Dirrk are both working hard, and we're all gonna benefit!
Also, I've noticed that things tend to go more smoothly when SetCPU is not set to start at boot...
Haha I was one of the ones who flashed it right away too, d12183 on the irc too
I am running this with a min. 100 max. 1200 conservative, no profiles. No problems yet, and battery is actually not looking much different.
Benefit of conservative governor, steps up to use.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I loaded this and when Set CPU is set to conservative the Benchmark Test freezes in 3d Test
BakaUnchi said:
I loaded this and when Set CPU is set to conservative the Benchmark Test freezes in 3d Test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine does this as well.
it will not freeze as long as i have it set at 1000 or less for max.
So... lets get this thing OC'd, eh? =)
Odinist said:
So... lets get this thing OC'd, eh? =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that anyone has developed a kernel that allows overclocking yet.
Haha not just yet, we need some kernel devs first
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
lp4261 said:
I don't think that anyone has developed a kernel that allows overclocking yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I figured that's what we're waiting on, I just felt like being impatient today though. ;-)
If its like the inspire, you can get to 1.6 easily on it stable.
Hope its like the g2 then we could hit 2 ghz
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Can start once HTC releases the source packages which might be next week - could be a month - but we're at their mercy.
I'm really looking forward to seeing what overclock speeds we can get out of this.
I find it funny that we all want overclock for it tho. What can't we do with our phones right now that a 2ghz overclock will fix? ...I think I just like knowing its there.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
I honestly want to do it for the hellavait
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
superchilpil said:
I honestly want to do it for the hellavait
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too, nice to push limits of the device to know what it can handle
no way i wanna oc this thing to the limit. maybe just once but the battery already sucks....
b33zy682 said:
no way i wanna oc this thing to the limit. maybe just once but the battery already sucks....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alot of overclocks on previous phones used lower voltage...which gave us LONGER batt life.
b33zy682 said:
no way i wanna oc this thing to the limit. maybe just once but the battery already sucks....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smartass scaling and undervolt go a long way for improved battery life.
Can any developer explain how it is possible to make a CPU faster and more effecient on battery, and why don't the manufacturers just do this before they sell it?
I understand the basics of how kernels work, but I wouldn't think you could safely double the speed of a processor while keeping it undervolted (coming from the d1)
Do they purposely underclock the kernel and used the same processors in "new" "faster" phones?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
suzook said:
Alot of overclocks on previous phones used lower voltage...which gave us LONGER batt life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hell yes! my eris gets 3 days @ 768mhz XD
HTC has to release it by April 2nd I believe bc of OpenGL agreement
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
mycomputerisjunk said:
Smartass scaling and undervolt go a long way for improved battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. The Thunderbolt is my tenth Android phone since November 09, and in every single case, scaling and undervolting have made worlds of difference in battery life as well as speed. I'm sure that things won't be any different on the Thunderbolt. Of course, the other thing that makes a huge difference is not playing with it for hours on end. New toys always drain batteries pretty fast.
gregdalfonso said:
Can any developer explain how it is possible to make a CPU faster and more effecient on battery, and why don't the manufacturers just do this before they sell it?
I understand the basics of how kernels work, but I wouldn't think you could safely double the speed of a processor while keeping it undervolted (coming from the d1)
Do they purposely underclock the kernel and used the same processors in "new" "faster" phones?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Part if it is what the industry calls "yield", that is just because they produce 10,000 1.5ghz cpu's in a batch, doesn't mean all 10,000 can run at 1.5ghz safely and stable, so manufacturers have to go with the fastest common speed In order to not waste those processesors that can't handle the full speed. Its the same thing with computers and videocards.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
mycomputerisjunk said:
Smartass scaling and undervolt go a long way for improved battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah!! This is what I am looking forward to.... not the overclocking but better efficiency
bmcclure937 said:
Yeah!! This is what I am looking forward to.... not the overclocking but better efficiency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely.
I have noticed so far that running SetCPU for just the scaling now is helping with my battery life, so that's at least a bit of awesome.
Hey, so just like the title says are you stable at 1.6ghz do a little test run quadrent on your phone and than if it passes your probably good but also try 10mins of angry birds just to make sure i on the other hands cannot run quadrent at 1.6ghz
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
K Rich said:
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Running stable at 1.6 also. Check this to run at 1.5.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1469710
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Andrew149 said:
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm stable at 1.5 (1350mV), though I don't run it at that daily. It was covered in steve's init thread in development. Look in the last few pages.
i run antutu all the time at 1.6 with no problems. guess i got lucky
Ok just gave my 1600mhz 50mv more and its stable now so i can finally overclock a little higher when needed
Stable only to [email protected] here. Locks up after that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Mine overclocks to 1.6 with no issues at all. I ran it like that for weeks until I decided that I want longer battery life. The stock speed is still fast, and underclocking still results in acceptable responsiveness.
I use Tasker to overclock my phone when playing certain intensive games. Otherwise, my phone is usually underclocked.
Mine's never crashed at 1.6, but I don't really stress test it there besides with benchmarks.
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Stable at 1.6 with custom kernels or tegrak on stock kernel. UV too.
SHOstock
Onepointsixingit
Mine is stable at 1.6ghz ✔
poofyhairguy said:
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow have you tried giving it more voltage.
Mine is stable at 1.6. Don't run it at that though regularly.
I've run 1.6 through quadrant and antutu many times. Never crashed.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I am very stable at 1.6
I have never had any issues at 1.6 and that is on just about every rom. I dont ever keep it at that cuz i dont enjoy sucking my battery but it is definitely fun to show off to others, HAHA! Also I have a captivate and the highest it would let me overclock it was 1.7 and that is ridiculous but it was unstable. lol
I've found a way to make almost every setting I have tried relatively stable. You just have to keep tweaking. It's not as simple as getting an overclock app and maxing. Here are some screen shots I took of a recent bench. This is only at 1632. I customized a I9100 ICS rom to be fully functional on my I777 and I'm scoring higher just above 1600 than I was closer to 1700. I was ranked 720 but those transformer primes! I wish it was only mobile phones on the chart! lol
Mine is stable at 1.6.......but im like everyone else. Don't like watching my battery drop like the ball at times square on new years eve lol .mine seems pretty happy at 1.4 with some under volting
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
This question looks idiot but there any kernel with 1ghz support for optimus one???
no
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Even if there was, you must plug your phone's power supply into a way more powerful source than the battery and hope the chipset won't burn out.
Nobody will even try to make such a kernel. This thread should be closed.
The question looks and is stupid... you want a burned phone?
I was born in the '90's... 1290's >
U r the craziest on xda ))
Sent from my Kindle Fire using xda premium
i did manage to oc my p500 up to 1.2 ghz with my custom kernel. everything worked flawlessly until i woke up.
klaudyuxxx said:
i did manage to oc my p500 up to 1.2 ghz with my custom kernel. everything worked flawlessly until i woke up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You woke up??? Alive???
And how did it run?
I was born in the '90's... 1290's >
p500 is just like Htc One (1,5 GHz, quad core) i had that nightmare, it was a firecracker waiting to blow.
klaudyuxxx said:
i did manage to oc my p500 up to 1.2 ghz with my custom kernel. everything worked flawlessly until i woke up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope you enjoyed that dream!!
Oomahey said:
Hope you enjoyed that dream!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh crap I forgot sarcasm, really thought he was serious... look what I posted ^ that explains...
attach a nuclear powered battery, should definately work then
mileston
they got the motorola milestone to 1.2 ghz and it runs the same chip as ours
might be possible and we have a bigger battery and more ram
hope someone will look into it we will have amazing quadrant scores
i have 2500 but im hoping to top 3000
opera38205 said:
they got the motorola milestone to 1.2 ghz and it runs the same chip as ours
might be possible and we have a bigger battery and more ram
hope someone will look into it we will have amazing quadrant scores
i have 2500 but im hoping to top 3000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
motorola milestone has an arm cortex a8, p500 has an arm 11. totally different processors.
Battery and ram don't count in overclocking.
opera38205 said:
they got the motorola milestone to 1.2 ghz and it runs the same chip as ours
might be possible and we have a bigger battery and more ram
hope someone will look into it we will have amazing quadrant scores
i have 2500 but im hoping to top 3000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, 2500 with ungaze/app2sd, but let me see your 3d score in antutu, i got mine to 750!
Echelonex said:
Yeah, 2500 with ungaze/app2sd, but let me see your 3d score in antutu, i got mine to 750!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant... 65 fps blackbird
Pherhaps
2500??? How could you?
ricboss said:
2500??? How could you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the first post in the following link and you will understand
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1042828
by just stepping out with 768-787mhz ..you'll reboot.. and by the way.. dont push OC to high.. though it doesnt burns your chips.. it's shorting the life span of it..
But how some tablets that have the same ARM11 proccessor like ours are set to 1Ghz!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM11
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium