Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Related
Galaxy S Plus
This seems to use the same hardware as our Galaxy S phones, does this mean we can possibly hit 1.4Ghz?
Overclocking doesn't always help your phone, but heats up the battery and it is possible that battery to be exploded(well, thats 1.6)
There aren't even stable 1.3ghz out yet, so we would have to wait and see.
We can get to 1.2GhZ already and it honestly doesn't make a difference in day to day usage except that your battery life will drop a good bit.
Can we get to 1.4? Maybe.
Is the hummingbird super finicky at anything over 1.2? Yep.
Could this be a slightly revised chip? Probably.
Is there much benefit?
Not really.
bobloblaw1 said:
We can get to 1.2GhZ already and it honestly doesn't make a difference in day to day usage except that your battery life will drop a good bit.
Can we get to 1.4? Maybe.
Is the hummingbird super finicky at anything over 1.2? Yep.
Could this be a slightly revised chip? Probably.
Is there much benefit?
Not really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ITs a different prossesor all together
GS+ = 1.4GHz Qualcomm MSM8255T chip
fascinate= Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110 (ARM Cortex A8), 1 GHz
Well then, thats out the window now isn't it
lambi1982 said:
Well then, thats out the window now isn't it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure we will see more then 1.2 ghz. I module overclock mine to 1.3 with a 1.2 kernel. And never any issues. Every phone is different and I can't even tell a drop in battery. I get over 48 hours per charge with regular usage. Plus I think one of the devs are working on 1.1-1.6ghz kernels as we speak.......... its all about voltages clock speeds and the right phone. Alot is possible with the right combo.
There was an old 1.6 voodoo rom a million years ago. I ran 1.3 till froyo hit now im at 1.2
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
dalrym05 said:
I'm sure we will see more then 1.2 ghz. I module overclock mine to 1.3 with a 1.2 kernel. And never any issues. Every phone is different and I can't even tell a drop in battery. I get over 48 hours per charge with regular usage. Plus I think one of the devs are working on 1.1-1.6ghz kernels as we speak.......... its all about voltages clock speeds and the right phone. Alot is possible with the right combo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trade phones with me. Ill post shipping.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
disclaimer: i personally think overclocking on high end phones is pointless...see my rant on uncutandroid for that though
anyway the other sgs phones all have 1.4 ghz oc kernels...so the processor is capable of it certainly...the nexus has 1.5 kernels, but thats on a .35 and gingerbread
so its certainly possible that those who *need* to overclock that high will be happy when nem has had more than a week to spend with kernel source
nitsuj17 said:
disclaimer: i personally think overclocking on high end phones is pointless...see my rant on uncutandroid for that though
anyway the other sgs phones all have 1.4 ghz oc kernels...so the processor is capable of it certainly...the nexus has 1.5 kernels, but thats on a .35 and gingerbread
so its certainly possible that those who *need* to overclock that high will be happy when nem has had more than a week to spend with kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you on the reason that its pointless overclocking high end phones. I've had an Evo, Epic, Droid 2, Droid X, and now the Fascinate. Overclocking and quadrant scores are pointless to me because its already freaking fast enough.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Daswolven said:
Trade phones with me. Ill post shipping.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No thanks. I got lucky j guess. My other one isn't to bad itself.
Hi, time ago i got 2200 on quadrant score with cyanogenmod. Now i can max get 1950. Why???
LoKKeR said:
Hi, time ago i got 2200 on quadrant score with cyanogenmod. Now i can max get 1950. Why???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a big deal..Quadrants are a piece of ****..They never give an accurate reading
Maiby overclock have ruined the cpu? It's possible? I don't use anymore it from a lot of time.
Ah, last score i got was 2000. The scores vary according to the governor system i set. What's the best governor for big games or generally for games?
If your using your rom that's why. The miui stuff slows it down incredibly. But miui isn't about speed.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
jusada said:
If your using your rom that's why. The miui stuff slows it down incredibly. But miui isn't about speed.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nono i get this score with all roms.
A user of xda with my rom have got up to 2000 on quadrant score.
Mmmm... I'll try Cyanogenmod-7.1-KANG. I remember that is one of the best rom i have tryed.
LoKKeR said:
Maiby overclock have ruined the cpu? It's possible? I don't use anymore it from a lot of time.
Ah, last score i got was 2000. The scores vary according to the governor system i set. What's the best governor for big games or generally for games?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, overclocking MOST DEFINITELY fault your processor in some way.
And the Prawsome is right: Quadrant scores don't mean anything at all. 0% reliable. You know what the best benchmark is? Your experience
Oh, and the best governor for gaming would be performance.
This post was sent from hell.
Hey, so just like the title says are you stable at 1.6ghz do a little test run quadrent on your phone and than if it passes your probably good but also try 10mins of angry birds just to make sure i on the other hands cannot run quadrent at 1.6ghz
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
K Rich said:
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Running stable at 1.6 also. Check this to run at 1.5.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1469710
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Andrew149 said:
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm stable at 1.5 (1350mV), though I don't run it at that daily. It was covered in steve's init thread in development. Look in the last few pages.
i run antutu all the time at 1.6 with no problems. guess i got lucky
Ok just gave my 1600mhz 50mv more and its stable now so i can finally overclock a little higher when needed
Stable only to [email protected] here. Locks up after that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Mine overclocks to 1.6 with no issues at all. I ran it like that for weeks until I decided that I want longer battery life. The stock speed is still fast, and underclocking still results in acceptable responsiveness.
I use Tasker to overclock my phone when playing certain intensive games. Otherwise, my phone is usually underclocked.
Mine's never crashed at 1.6, but I don't really stress test it there besides with benchmarks.
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Stable at 1.6 with custom kernels or tegrak on stock kernel. UV too.
SHOstock
Onepointsixingit
Mine is stable at 1.6ghz ✔
poofyhairguy said:
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow have you tried giving it more voltage.
Mine is stable at 1.6. Don't run it at that though regularly.
I've run 1.6 through quadrant and antutu many times. Never crashed.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I am very stable at 1.6
I have never had any issues at 1.6 and that is on just about every rom. I dont ever keep it at that cuz i dont enjoy sucking my battery but it is definitely fun to show off to others, HAHA! Also I have a captivate and the highest it would let me overclock it was 1.7 and that is ridiculous but it was unstable. lol
I've found a way to make almost every setting I have tried relatively stable. You just have to keep tweaking. It's not as simple as getting an overclock app and maxing. Here are some screen shots I took of a recent bench. This is only at 1632. I customized a I9100 ICS rom to be fully functional on my I777 and I'm scoring higher just above 1600 than I was closer to 1700. I was ranked 720 but those transformer primes! I wish it was only mobile phones on the chart! lol
Mine is stable at 1.6.......but im like everyone else. Don't like watching my battery drop like the ball at times square on new years eve lol .mine seems pretty happy at 1.4 with some under volting
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I run Quadrant Standard on XXLPB ROM, it give me the single core 1.2Ghz CPU result.
even it give me benchmark at ~3800
HOW COME ?
Does a higher benchmark score help you make phone calls faster?
Quadrant has not been updated for ages, also benchmarks proves nothing its only gives some personal satisfaction
Hehe ;-) That's right Bala. Usually the satisfaction that happens after the person running the benchmark faps off over the enormous benchmark scores they got
bala_gamer said:
Quadrant has not been updated for ages, also benchmarks proves nothing its only gives some personal satisfaction
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bala_gamer said:
Quadrant has not been updated for ages, also benchmarks proves nothing its only gives some personal satisfaction
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah your right...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
garekinokami said:
Does a higher benchmark score help you make phone calls faster?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is hands down the best response to a benchmark thread I've ever seen. Lol bravo!
Sent from inside a black hole.
well i got 3950 score.
what i notice was on the system info it shows a single core processor. however on gingerbread it does show a dual core processor.
Quadrant was kind of useful in the S1 days but with the S2 it's useless.
No matter what rom I've tried, the phone is fast. I don't need it to be any faster or an app to tell me how fast it is.
Sent from my GT-I9100T
Quadrant never even supported dual core CPU's.
Thread should be closed after Post No. 3.
garekinokami said:
Does a higher benchmark score help you make phone calls faster?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe, OP worry was if the room he's using supports 2 cors rather then 1 as it says in quadrant benchmark and the question was not about the result he received.
yes, it does.
很快
Sent from my GT-P7300 using Tapatalk
with what program i test my benchmark i see people post their benchmark score and i want to know what the prog that everybody use
You have many! Some of them are Antutu, Quadrant, GLbenchmark,...
You can find these in the Play Store. Have fun running some tests!
bubu23 said:
with what program i test my benchmark i see people post their benchmark score and i want to know what the prog that everybody use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None they are pretty much pointless unless you are worried about high numbers and you have a huge ego because of it
Giving it some beans on my blue s3
adz63 said:
None they are pretty much pointless unless you are worried about high numbers and you have a huge ego because of it
Giving it some beans on my blue s3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds like the words of someone that hasn't got the skill to successfully OC their phone and run a good benchmark. Nothing beats the feeling of spending hours researching and implementing a good setup and have it run really well in a benchmark test. Egos have nothing to do with it.
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
CF Benchmark about the best .
jje
Dinwoodie said:
That sounds like the words of someone that hasn't got the skill to successfully OC their phone and run a good benchmark. Nothing beats the feeling of spending hours researching and implementing a good setup and have it run really well in a benchmark test. Egos have nothing to do with it.
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know how easy it is to manipulate those numbers? Remember I flashed a rom on s2 with something tweaked so it got double the score it should have get
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
norpan111 said:
You know how easy it is to manipulate those numbers? Remember I flashed a rom on s2 with something tweaked so it got double the score it should have get
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You miss the point. How would you get the self satisfaction if you know you had 'cheated' to get the score?
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
do these benchmark apps test quad core cpu's? last time i checked, they didnt even register the second core on the SII
And benchmarks are just a 'my penis is faaaar bigger than yours' statement
Dont waste your time "benchmarking" its pointless, unless you really really want to. Then stop, and find much more useful things to do to your phone..... like using the crap out of it. Benchmarking is for pre-teens.
Dinwoodie said:
You miss the point. How would you get the self satisfaction if you know you had 'cheated' to get the score?
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of the score? I might as well throw two dices and get self satisfaction from high numbers.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
The point of the score is to see the phone perform at it's peak without it crashing. Throwing 2 dice doesn't guarantee 2 high numbers let alone 1. How is this a worthy comparison?
How does one end up comparing how fast a phone runs to the size of a penis?
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
You are flogging a dead horse
A developer forum like this knows that benchmarks are irrelevant...you keep using it though, it seems to make you happy
Ok I'm new to the forum and flashing phones etc. So I'll run my train of thought.
Whenever I overclock a desktop computer and adjust any cpu related setting whether it be voltage or fsb and boot windows the only way I can tell if my overclock is stable is to stress test it and run a benchmark. How is this any different with phones? How am I meant to know if I am getting the best performance from my phone if I don't benchmark it after I tweak it?
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
I know benchmarks don't mean much - but I thought to run them on my S1 and S3 and compare - here are the results:
SGS 1 – GT-I9000
Nenamark2: 22.5 FPS
Nenamark1: 48 FPS
Antutu: 3060 Total score
Billion Counter: 51.35 secs
Vellamo: 590
SGS 3 – GT-I9300
Nenamark2: 58.9 FPS
Nenamark1: 60.0 FPS
Antutu: 12098 Total score
Billion Counter: 28.805secs
Vellamo: 2047
For pics/evidence: Unboxing & Initial impressions of the Samsung Galaxy S III – GT-i9300 – SGS3
TotallydubbedHD said:
I know benchmarks don't mean much - but I thought to run them on my S1 and S3 and compare - here are the results:
SGS 1 – GT-I9000
Nenamark2: 22.5 FPS
Nenamark1: 48 FPS
Antutu: 3060 Total score
Billion Counter: 51.35 secs
Vellamo: 590
SGS 3 – GT-I9300
Nenamark2: 58.9 FPS
Nenamark1: 60.0 FPS
Antutu: 12098 Total score
Billion Counter: 28.805secs
Vellamo: 2047
For pics/evidence: Unboxing & Initial impressions of the Samsung Galaxy S III – GT-i9300 – SGS3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice video, good seeing u here. Saw u a lot on darkys forums.
bbgt2 said:
Nice video, good seeing u here. Saw u a lot on darkys forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey man!
Thanks
I'm back on there, but this time an admin !