Jave scores seem low. What affects java scores and what can be done to improve them?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
what do u mean by low?
Look at "Your Device"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I always see low java scores with CF Bench, it's not a confusion over which score to look at.
I get super low Java scores using the cm kernel as well, lower then stock froyo atrix
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA App
jackxlj said:
I get super low Java scores using the cm kernel as well, lower then stock froyo atrix
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me as well. I wonder why...stock kernel must have something CM7 kernel doesn't.
agurzhiy said:
what do u mean by low?
Look at "Your Device"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your java score is double what I am getting. Is this using kholks updated kernel?
I'm wondering this as well..what is it testing.for the java score
I flashed fauxs 1.9 kernel and aura and now java scores back to normal
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Related
post your htc flyer benchmarks here (neocore , quadrant , linpak, nenamark)
any one got one
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
upperkingjr said:
I should Hope it beats the phones you listed!
cant you use something on par with the tablet, like another tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tablets.use.the same internals as smartphones.
here is mine. how you guys have such a high score?
L.E. got it better!
Has any one tried neocore
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
This was my third run but they were all about the same.
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
drinkluder1 said:
Why does the flyer get such low score in quadrant? My Motorola Defy (oc to 1000mhz) gets a lot more than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because your phone is junk! No just kidding, the quadrant score don't mean anything that I can find? On my old sgs I was rooted over clock my bench mark was like 1200 my wife was stock her bench mark was like 700 and to login to the Internet, go into sites, download apps, games everything was the same speed as mine?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
So I put SuperVibe on last night and am absolutely loving it. I have CM7 on my Nook and overclocked it to 1.3 via the CM7 integrated settings. I want to do the same on my Vibrant. I was just wondering what the best clock would be to do. I'd like to keep a good battery life, and would like to see a nice little improvement performance wise.
Any suggestions?
I think supercm7vide comes with Neo kernel. With that kernel, the Max oc is 1.6.
One good app to use to oc and undervolt is voltagecontrol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
geoffcorey said:
I think supercm7vide comes with Neo kernel. With that kernel, the Max oc is 1.6.
One good app to use to oc and undervolt is voltagecontrol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it does go up to 1.6, though I read somewhere it's not recommended to go that high. Is using the CM7 settings sufficient? Or should I look into that app you mentioned? And is bumping it up 1.3ish fine?
Thanks
yeah, using cm settings will work, but you could find you're unstable even at 1.3, but using voltage control, you can try to stabilize it by undervolting.
Im running the latest cm7 nightly with neo 10 kernel at 1440 mhz btw i undervolted using voltage control and i cant say much 4 the battery cuz i only used it 4 a day but its stable 4 me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH T959 w/ CM7 (theme -> synergy), neo 10 kernel
Couldnt find any thread for this so fawt id start one so everyonr can show off the scores of their phones if u post then put what rom you are using
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is my most frequent on my mini
Sent from my X10mini using XDA App
ow did u get tha score
sent from my x10mini with minicm7 nAa kernal v5 supercharged using XDA App
Wow! How did you make that score? Which rom did you use?
Sent from My Xperia X10 Mini Pro with Flame.E v0.4..
Im just using gingerDX's cm7 port as is, only extra ive got is its running a dif launcher?
Sent from my X10mini using XDA App
I doubt this is real
This is fake, is just a hack that only works at quadrant, why dont you share another benchmark so we can compare?
ChavitoArg said:
This is fake, is just a hack that only works at quadrant, why dont you share another benchmark so we can compare?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok u got me lol yeah its a hack that ive got on my phone still pretty cool tho haha
Sent from my X10mini using XDA App
You mounted quadrant to your ram?
Sent from my E10i using XDA App
whitest0rm said:
Ok u got me lol yeah its a hack that ive got on my phone still pretty cool tho haha
Sent from my X10mini using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i troll you x2 see
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
What does your RAM consumption look like on the ROM that you guys are using? Mine is almost always 280 MB+ and as you guys know we only have 368/369 MB of RAM. What ROM or methods do you guys use to keep your RAM use at a minimum? CM7 had the best RAM conservation for me (165-220 on average) but I want to use a ROM that is 4.1+ while still being able to use apps that take up a lot of ram smoothly.
Edit; Added Screenshot
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
This is my point. When all my recent apps are cleared, and I've closed the running apps, Im always using 280MB+
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
I'm using slimrom and I tweaked the ram performance settings and I don't have quite such an issue.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app
GIMMEDEMROMS said:
I'm using slimrom and I tweaked the ram performance settings and I don't have quite such an issue.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not sure which ROM im using at the current moment. But its the only one thats has runwithout a single issue whatsoever for over 2 months. So its a keeper. But mines always about 50-90 mb free. I dont ever mess with the ram because thats when I do run into a problem. Mostly mine is taken up by Settings or other system controls. So if you could elaborate which settings you are using. I also notice that if my SD card gets full then the phone wil run slow as well.
Hello XDA members,
My friend found a Kernel that allows to clock his phone at 1.2Ghz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
He got it from this YouTube Video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5ta4hUVCc
So with your help can we confirm if it is Fake or Legit?
He did an Antutu Benchmark test and it the difference between the CPU scores were 1, so I think it is fake.
BTW the video is in Spanish!
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
-SyncSoft- said:
Hello XDA members,
My friend found a Kernel that allows to clock his phone at 1.2Ghz.
He got it from this YouTube Video.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5ta4hUVCc
So with your help can we confirm if it is Fake or Legit?
He did an Antutu Benchmark test and it the difference between the CPU scores were 1, so I think it is fake.
BTW the video is in Spanish!
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its fake of course as benchmark resulted with 1 score difference. There are some miscalculating with the kernel probably
Angryace said:
its fake of course as benchmark resulted with 1 score difference. There are some miscalculating with the kernel probably
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, I have already stated that I think it is fake. But looking into it more, it looks like an older version of the Rafael.baugis kernel which I think used to have a placebo with the clocking.
Moderator, please close this thread.
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk