Post your Quadrant benchmark results here.
Quadrant is a benchmarking tool that rates and scores your device on a number of categories.
Can be downloaded from the market
When posting can you please mention:
~Device name
~If your using a stock or custom ROM
~Any lagfixes
~Custom tweaks or mods.
QR CODE
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Scan with "Barcode Scanner" from market.
---------- Post added at 11:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 PM ----------
1st mine
Here is mine
CyanogenMod 7 2.3.5 cooper KANG
on cyanogenmod (beghrad's) 1975 with quadrant booster
Jun Hong said:
on cyanogenmod (beghrad's) 1975 with quadrant booster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of benchmarking with a mount hack?
What's the point comparing scores of the most unreliable benchmark, except for knowing whose e-magic-stick is the longest?
quadrant
my maximum score was 2004 on kang cm7 after deleting some system apps and tweakig it by myself. my usual scores are around 1900-1950 with many apps on it. i will try with the booster too to see the limits and tell you!
EDIT:2364!!!! f*** this is insane!!
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
~Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830
~CyanoAce beta3
New score
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
Woah buddy nice score there.Can you tell us how you achieved it?
I have managed to get to 1760 just with tweaks from the ROM and then reflashed a couple of times.
Dekkerlion said:
Woah buddy nice score there.Can you tell us how you achieved it?
I have managed to get to 1760 just with tweaks from the ROM and then reflashed a couple of times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the performance governer and a little change in dpi + Killing all tasks
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
mine with original Samsung firmware 2.3.3
quick questions guys.
what do you press if you screen capture the result?
back button + power button doesnt work for me.
thank you.
kyle_nexus said:
quick questions guys.
what do you press if you screen capture the result?
back button + power button doesnt work for me.
thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on your firmware. The older builds use back plus home, the newer ones use home plus power, cyanogenmod uses its own screencapturing method.
*Do'oh! The quadrant scores really make me miss the CM7.1 nightlies. Okay a question fellas. Do you find a positive correlation between your Quadrant Score and the performance of flash in browser e.g. Dolphin HD or Maxthon etc
Stock XWKS2 (Android 2.3.5) + several Tweaks from this forum
First screen is from Quadrant, second is from Antutu.
Mine. . .
my new rom, cm7 based icecream sunday coming tomorrow. be online at 12pm to get your copy.
Expectation < Reality
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
these are my best scores.. quadrant score is different in every test..
cyanoace by behradGH
oc kernel by ketut.kumajaya, set to 844Mhz
v6 supercharger script update 8
sd card speed booster app..set to 2650..
consegregate said:
Depends on your firmware. The older builds use back plus home, the newer ones use home plus power, cyanogenmod uses its own screencapturing method.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My device is SHW-M110S running Gingerbread 2.3.5. The screen capturing for my device is back button + power button but when in quadrant it goes back to quadrant menu. I also tried other button combo.
In normal mode at 1.0 Ghz I got 2,000'ish score and in overclocked at 1.3Ghz I got 3,000'ish score.
I'd really like to screen cap the results.
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
Related
We all own one of the most powerful smartphone to date. With great custom Rom's and kernels available, we get some of the highest benchmarks.
So now it's time to show them off!!
Post your:
- Quadrant
- CF-Bench
- AnTuTu
scores here.
Briefly describe the Rom/kernel you're using along with Ext4 (w/ or w/o journaling)/Ext3/CM7 partitions as well as mentioning if it is stock or OC'ed frequency.
Even if you don't have the highest benchmarks, feel free to share them! CM7 gets higher benchmarks than other Rom's anyway.
Highest Benchmarks will be posted on #2 for both OC and stock clocks. So it's a bit like a competition.
Bare in mind these three things:
Please post screenshots! Don't give numbers or your score will NOT be shown on #1/2!
Please upload in either qHD or resize to 640x480. Anything LESS will not be shown on #1/2!
Even if your score doesn't beat the ones on #1/2, FEEL FREE TO UPLOAD THEM ANYWAY!! In general, CM7 gets higher scores anyway, so DON'T be put off!
Good luck!
Highest Results for OC'ed
Quadrant:
by "elbscorp"
ATT 236.45.141 Deodexed
Faux123's 1.45hz kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CF-Bench:
by "95rr900"
NottachTrix 1.2.9b
Kholk's 1.5Ghz OC kernel
AnTuTu:
by "totti123456"
Clemsyn's Elite Combo ROM 7.2
Clemsyn's 1.6Ghz Elite kernel
Highest Results for Stock Clocks
Quadrant:
By 'euplio'
Neutrino based EE ROM
Stock CM7 (EE) Kernel
CF-Bench:
By 'Notorious544d'
Aura 1.2.2.1
Ext4 w/o journaling and w/ Extents
Faux's 0.2.1 Enhanced Kernel
AnTuTu
By 'MrCoolBear'
CM7 Ba2tf
Faux123 0.2.3 Enhanced Kernel
This sounds interesting enough, I'm in! Although I never seem to get as high of scores as most of the ones I see, even though I try to follow all the advice I find...
Alien#4 (with theme)
EXT4 (I think its with journaling, whichever is stabler but lower performance)
OC @ 1.3
AnTuTu: 5364
CF-Bench: 6087
Quadrant: 3346
I don't know if these are accurate, though. For some reason the Java scores in CF-bench were WAY too low (like, below stock Atrix levels), and I don't know if the other benchmarks take that into account.
CM7 beta with 0.2.0 kernel from faux overclocked to 1.3GHz
Quadrant: 3962
AnTuTu: 5981
CF-Bench: 5940
Smartbench 2011: Productivity 4345 Gaming 2828
DarkSide 2.0 with faux123 0.2.0 at 1.3gz.
Impressive results from a lot of people, however, can you please upload screenshots? It'll look better and cleaner on #1/#2.
Thanks.
useing alien v4 faux v2.0 0c 1.3
running alien v4 @1.2 faux 1.3 oc kernal Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ltdanno360 said:
running alien v4 @1.2 faux 1.3 oc kernal Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice score, but Nottach's score is BEASTLY! Btw, why are java scores so low sometimes?
Here my scores:
Quadrant: 4334
Smartbench: 4232 CPU, 2972 GPU.
CM7 , [email protected] 1.3 ...
Quadrant : 4910 \m/
AnTuTu : 6100 i think...
think i haven't any screenshots :| atrix rocks \m/
PAR3A said:
CM7 , [email protected] 1.3 ...
Quadrant : 4910 \m/
AnTuTu : 6100 i think...
think i haven't any screenshots :| atrix rocks \m/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use 'screen grabber' to take screenshots. Hold down search key to activate.
Running CM7 + Faux123's 2.0 kernel :3
CM7, 1.3GHz OC, stock voltage
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
neer2005 said:
CM7, 1.3GHz OC, stock voltage
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i cant believe neer is still alive!
The BadAzz Aura 1212...
Sorry for the late update. Have updated #1 accordingly with new records.
Holy cheese those are some cracking benchmarks!!!
We need more people with stock clocks in here lol.
If anybody posts, despite how low their score might be, they'll be on #2
i just realizee i was running pandora in the background also
alienv4 custom webtop+xfdesktop-xfce4-panel +java pluging in firefox
fauxsv2.0 1.3 oc
CM7 - FAUX [email protected]
The other day I achieved the highest benchmark I've ever gotten on this beast of a phone with the help of rom toolbox. Here's how.
Go to performance in rom toolbox.
CPU slider set to 1.45 GHz (unified kernel)
Memory preset to agressive
SD boost set to 4096
Sysctl set to 4096, 50, 10, 1
Try these out and let me know if it helps. Post anything you changed to help others.
If your phone blows up or bricks (neither are likely to happen but) I'm not responsible,
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
How useful is sysctl and do you know any other tips about it?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Have no clue what it is or what it does......just know putting those numbers in there makes it faster lol......glad I could help
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
hatefuel19 said:
Have no clue what it is or what it does......just know putting those numbers in there makes it faster lol......glad I could help
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You expect people to follow your advice when you self admittedly have absolutely no idea what you are doing???
Thanks but no thanks!
CaelanT said:
You expect people to follow your advice when you self admittedly have absolutely no idea what you are doing???
Thanks but no thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I expect nothing. I know that by messing around I found a combo that raised antutu from the mid 5000 to a 6926. It also took cf-bench from 10000 range native to a 13700 native. Follow what I put or don't. I don't care. I don't know what I'm doing but I learn by trial and error. If you want to know what these values mean, Google it. If you want a quick and easy way to improve performance, give my settings a try.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
try antutu with default settings. use faux 1.45ghz kernel.
antutu usually gives bm score around 6900 for atrix with faux 1.45 ghz kernel.....
---------- Post added at 01:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 AM ----------
you guys ever noticed the person who is at the top of the antutu atrix benchmarkk?? hes got a score of 7500 with the 1.45ghz. i always wonder how he made that score. i have tried all performance upgrades. my device usually comes with a score of 6900.
Newly flashed reloaded rom @ 1.45 gave me antutu score in the 5000 range. It was only after changing these values I could get into 6000s and blew me away when I got a 6926. I'm still tweaking the SD boost setting in rom toolbox. I could break 7000 if I could get just a little more out of it but I don't want to pay for a higher class card. I think mine is class 4.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409
Hey I have been looking at some benchmarks for various devices and can only find stock tests posted by different sites so post your results here!
Here are my tests results all at stock clock and voltage
Sunspider: 757.3ms (lower is better)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Kraken: 9782.7ms (lower is better)
Octane: 2981 (higher is better)
Update:
Browser: AOSP Browser
Device: Rooted, running AOSP+ JOP40D with kernel included in rom 12/20/12. Stock CPU clock at stock voltages
Update 2:
I also ran these test underclocked @1.4ghz to have a comparison of Exynos 5250 vs A6X cpu in the iPad4 at the same clock speed
SunSpider: 925.9ms @1.4ghz
Kraken: 11589.3ms @1.4ghz
Octane: 2526 @1.4ghz
If we are evaluating different browsers then it might be good to post what browser you are using and whether your device is rooted or not. At a glance from the screenshots it appears to me that you might be using ocean browser and that your Nexus 10 is rooted. Is that correct? Seems to be very good scores by the way.
Sunspider;
Ocean = 757.9ms
Dolphin = 959.6ms
Chrome = 1383.2ms
Everything stock, no root.
Not rooted using Ocean Browser:
Sunspider: 768.4
Kraken: 10062.2
Octane: 2912
JPW1 said:
If we are evaluating different browsers then it might be good to post what browser you are using and whether your device is rooted or not. At a glance from the screenshots it appears to me that you might be using ocean browser and that your Nexus 10 is rooted. Is that correct? Seems to be very good scores by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for pointing that out. OP updated
UCBrower HD:
Octane: 2899
Sun spider: 839.0ms
Kraken: 9991.2ms
Rooted running Stock with KTManta kernel
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda premium
HolyChicken said:
Update 2:
I also ran these test underclocked @1.4ghz to have a comparison of Exynos 5450 vs A6X cpu in the iPad4 at the same clock speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5450? It hasn't released yet lol correct it, iPad4 has better GPU and n10 has better cpu
i9100g user said:
Exynos 5450? It hasn't released yet lol correct it, iPad4 has better GPU and n10 has better cpu
sent from my gs3 GT i 9300
----------------------------------
stock jb 4.1.1 , siyah kernel1.83,dual boot
1st Rom stock jb 4.1.1
2nd Rom cm10 4.1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no need to quote the whole OP. >_>
Running CM 10.1
Sunspider results
Dolphin Beta: 693.2ms
AOSP: 794.6ms
Ocean: 835.7ms
Boat: 837.3ms
Firefox: 972.2ms
Firefox Beta: 993.4ms
Dolphin: 1132.7ms
Chrome: 1354.0ms
I'll try to run the other benchmarks on the above browsers when I get a chance.
I'm rooted and using the KTManta kernel with the stock ROM and my results in sunspider with Dolphin Beta were
Ktoonservative gov @1.7 got me 653ms in my first attempt
Ktoonservative @1.4 got me 782ms in my first attempt
Surface? iPad? Get on our level
Fidelator said:
I'm rooted and using the KTManta kernel with the stock ROM and my results in sunspider with Dolphin Beta were
Ktoonservative gov @1.7 got me 653ms in my first attempt
Ktoonservative @1.4 got me 782ms in my first attempt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not bad at all. Would you mind running the test 3 times and posting your median score? That is what I usually do when bench marking to eliminate possible outliers.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Anybody consider to submit your device's scores into this thread
Just a fun and informative way to see everyone's benchmarks. Also see how each rom or kernel is performing. Please let us know what benchmark app you are using along with the rom and kernel. :thumbup:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Padawan JB v2 rom oc @ 1512Mhz smartassv2 gov / sio scheduler
8132 score - CM 9.1 - 1.8ghz - Performance & sio - flapp's latest.
However, I usually run at 1134 and would take the pepsi challenge with any overclocked JB rom as far as responsiveness, speed, and battery life.
I need to try and lower my clock speed and see if it helps any. My scores are messed up due to lack of speed in sd-card reading/writing. Very low. In the 100-200 range for both
sent from my sending thing
There was a thread for this a while back .... But I had the highest I'm pretty sure with quadrant ..... I hit a 4111
£|@$h•h°|i©
shayneflashindaily said:
There was a thread for this a while back .... But I had the highest I'm pretty sure with quadrant ..... I hit a 4111
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried quadrant. I stay around 8 grand with AntuTu
...sent from my sending thing
androidmechanic said:
I haven't tried quadrant. I stay around 8 grand with AntuTu
...sent from my sending thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uber kernel which i just released with revolt i was hitting 9500+ @ 1.89ghz, performance gov, bfq i/o, gpu oc'd *that was with a class2 sdcard loaded*
JamieD81 said:
uber kernel which i just released with revolt i was hitting 9500+ @ 1.89ghz, performance gov, bfq i/o, gpu oc'd *that was with a class2 sdcard loaded*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow!! You just keep pumpin em out, eh? You slid that one out without me even knowing. Last build of yours I was on was SuperNexus and I absolutely loved the stable, smooth, and quite speedy vanilla experience. I was in 8500's on AntuTu with SN
...sent from my sending thing
Herw is mine, blackjelly rom. Quadrant was 2985
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I ran saurom back in the day over clocked like crazy but set up right ... I was running very light barely any apps ..kept the Bare minimum... 4111...highest jb ROM quadrant I think I hit high 3000s...but its hit or miss with quadrant ... And not only that our phone can only do so much
...as long as it functions smooth and seemless I have no worries.
£|@$h•h°|i©
shayneflashindaily said:
I ran saurom back in the day over clocked like crazy but set up right ... I was running very light barely any apps ..kept the Bare minimum... 4111...highest jb ROM quadrant I think I hit high 3000s...but its hit or miss with quadrant ... And not only that our phone can only do so much
...as long as it functions smooth and seemless I have no worries.
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Waiting for the Note 3 to come in sept./oct this year. Ill be due for my upgrade. Looks like we getting the snapdragon 800
...sent from my sending thing
7503 with antutu
3297 with quadrant
Stock 4.1.2 rom rooted
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Here is mine oc at 1780
...sent from my sending thing