Why arent there any custom CM7 roms? - TouchPad General

I have cm7 running on my tablet and it runs great, but Im wondering why no one has bothered to use its drivers and stuff to port something like Miui or even post up themed tweaked versions of CM7?

Cozy its stilling its alpha stage. Wait for it to become a final version and u will sweethis forum filled up with custom rom's and such...
Sent from me using XDA App.

Well, at least a public RC. I'm more interested in CM9.
Sent from my very "non-stock" TP.

Leoisright had a good rom going, but it's in closed testing now because of all the idiots not reading directions/ bashing his work.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium

mindstormmaster1 said:
I have cm7 running on my tablet and it runs great, but Im wondering why no one has bothered to use its drivers and stuff to port something like Miui or even post up themed tweaked versions of CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would this qualify as a tweaked version of CM7?
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/11/hp-touchpad-new-android-rom-team-xron/
Sent from my HP Touchpad using Tapatalk

i was thinking about this the other day, isn't it taking alot longer than usual, compared to let's say a HD2? That initial hype of porting Android on to the touchpad seems to have died down.
not saying this in an impatient way or demoralizing developers and their hard work, cuz they are doing one heck of a job to get peoplewhat they want most of all on their fondle slab
....is it because not many developers are interested in the touchpad?...couldn't get hold if one?
That said HP's new move of selling touchpads only to developers might work in favour of getting some momentum to port Android on it
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk

Once we get the ics source all this will be null... Hopefully
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk

I'd be really interested in seeing a Sense ROM ported from the Puccini/Jetstream. A lot of the hardware is apparently quite similar, and it'd probably make for a better tablet-ified experience while we wait for ICS.
Although, with ICS so close, it's probably not worth it.

ehtoeh said:
Would this qualify as a tweaked version of CM7?
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/11/hp-touchpad-new-android-rom-team-xron/
Sent from my HP Touchpad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the rom that Leoisright made, but is not available right now. I have it loaded and it runs good with only a few bugs.

ace9988 said:
i was thinking about this the other day, isn't it taking alot longer than usual, compared to let's say a HD2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS source comes out in a couple weeks.
It would be pointless to spend weeks working on a port of something, if the new version comes out shortly.
Devs are just waiting for ICS source to drop.
Plus the HD2 was a totally different scenario.
It was made by one of the largest android phone makers, and the hardware in the phone was similar to its android counterparts.

Why don't you make us one minds?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App

scrizz said:
ICS source comes out in a couple weeks.
It would be pointless to spend weeks working on a port of something, if the new version comes out shortly.
Devs are just waiting for ICS source to drop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully that's how it happens
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk

ace9988 said:
Hopefully that's how it happens
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
scrizz said:
ICS source comes out in a couple weeks.
It would be pointless to spend weeks working on a port of something, if the new version comes out shortly.
Devs are just waiting for ICS source to drop.
Plus the HD2 was a totally different scenario.
It was made by one of the largest android phone makers, and the hardware in the phone was similar to its android counterparts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want stable android which is running on touchpad. Why other tablet are very stable both on android 2.3 and 3.x ? But not happen on tp!

hki_peter said:
I just want stable android which is running on touchpad. Why other tablet are very stable both on android 2.3 and 3.x ? But not happen on tp!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the Touchpad is not an android tablet!!!
It is a WebOS tablet.
It takes a lot of work to get a different OS working properly.
name me other tablets that have stable android and did not come stock with android.
don't forget the people working on this are not getting paid.
This is not their day job.

scrizz said:
the Touchpad is not an android tablet!!!
It is a WebOS tablet.
It takes a lot of work to get a different OS working properly.
name me other tablets that have stable android and did not come stock with android.
don't forget the people working on this are not getting paid.
This is not their day job.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nook Color

mindstormmaster1 said:
Nook Color
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
B&N uses a modified version of FroYo for the Nook Color. Source is available for the kernel.

I think another factor is the Touchpad is not easily accessible for some people. Maybe it was easy to get yours, but I had a little bit of trouble. Missed the sales and ended up paying more for mine.

mindstormmaster1 said:
Nook Color
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nook color came with android.....
nice try

I'm happy with what has been posted so far from CM. I haven't had a lot of issues with what has been released. I guess I have too much going on to be concerned with changes to the touchpad. I can patiently wait for ICS to be released. I'd have to imagine it will be easier to work with since it ICS is designed with tablets in mind.

cubbieswin said:
I'm happy with what has been posted so far from CM. I haven't had a lot of issues with what has been released. I guess I have too much going on to be concerned with changes to the touchpad. I can patiently wait for ICS to be released. I'd have to imagine it will be easier to work with since it ICS is designed with tablets in mind.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is designed as a hybrid with phones and tablets in mind. If you really just want tablet, then use the Honeycomb source which has also just been released.

Related

ICS release, it's mean Honeycomb is over

ICS source already released on market by Google, it's mean Honeycomb is over ?
ICS design running both on mobile phone and Tablet, who's going to use Honeycomb on tablet anymore ?
Since honeycomb source was never released, the only people running it would be tablets that haven't gotten the update, ergo honeycomb will be over once everyone picks up an update
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
I had an Asus Transformer on honeycomb, I sold it once CM7 and WebOS could dual boot on the TouchPad.
Honeycomb wasn't as good as WebOS OR CM7 in my opinion....
CM7 is still very buggy and doesnt hav enough tablet optimization
lets patiently wait for ICS
ace9988 said:
Since honeycomb source was never released, the only people running it would be tablets that haven't gotten the update, ergo honeycomb will be over once everyone picks up an update
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honeycomb source was released....yesterday.
hki_peter said:
ICS source already released on market by Google, it's mean Honeycomb is over ?
ICS design running both on mobile phone and Tablet, who's going to use Honeycomb on tablet anymore ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess also whos gonna be using froyo or gb anymore since source is out
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Tablets that manufacturers cant be bothered to support maybe
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Lothaen said:
Tablets that manufacturers cant be bothered to support maybe
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*looks at G-Tablet
Sigh...
The transformer prime isnt even released yet and won't be for a couple of more weeks and it will launch with honeycomb lol
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Nburnes said:
Honeycomb source was released....yesterday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This makes me laugh. What's matter with Goooogle? I am waiting for ICS running on the TouchPad.
dajogejr said:
I had an Asus Transformer on honeycomb, I sold it once CM7 and WebOS could dual boot on the TouchPad.
Honeycomb wasn't as good as WebOS OR CM7 in my opinion....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did the exact same thing about 2 weeks ago. I really didn't like honeycomb at all. I really hope ICS is better. I am going to be truly disappointed if it is a lot like honeycomb. I guess I will be one of the few with Gingerbread on an Evo3D a year from now. Hopefully HTC can get the ugliness gone with Sense.
http://phandroid.com/2011/10/19/cyanogenmod-no-ics-based-cm9-until-aosp-source-drops-shocker/
http://www.oddpattern.com/2011/11/1...ed-on-ics-set-for-release-in-two-months-time/
It is including HP Touchpad ?
Go to CyanogenMod official webpage (http://www.cyanogenmod.com/devices) and go to devices, can't find HP Touchpad !
hki_peter said:
http://phandroid.com/2011/10/19/cyanogenmod-no-ics-based-cm9-until-aosp-source-drops-shocker/
http://www.oddpattern.com/2011/11/1...ed-on-ics-set-for-release-in-two-months-time/
It is including HP Touchpad ?
Go to CyanogenMod official webpage (http://www.cyanogenmod.com/devices) and go to devices, can't find HP Touchpad !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is because it is not merged yet...
Nburnes said:
Honeycomb source was released....yesterday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honeycomb Source was released because it had to be released due to Open Source Licensing. (GPL & LGPL)
Even thought the development of Honeycomb has pretty much dead ended with ICS source being dropped, to remain in compliance they had to release it.
The only reason they didn't, as I understand it, is it still being a bit buggy and the fear of people trying to port it to phones resulting in mass hysteria.
Saintfyre said:
Honeycomb Source was released because it had to be released due to Open Source Licensing. (GPL & LGPL)
Even thought the development of Honeycomb has pretty much dead ended with ICS source being dropped, to remain in compliance they had to release it.
The only reason they didn't, as I understand it, is it still being a bit buggy and the fear of people trying to port it to phones resulting in mass hysteria.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I believe Android source doesn't have to be released ever, only the kernel does.
Nburnes said:
Honeycomb source was released....yesterday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yh i hadn't read the news before i read this thread ;P thank you for advising me
but either way the only people interested in honeycomb would be those two see what elements from honeycomb have been bought to ICS (not visually) but the inside stuff if any.
dajogejr said:
I had an Asus Transformer on honeycomb, I sold it once CM7 and WebOS could dual boot on the TouchPad.
Honeycomb wasn't as good as WebOS OR CM7 in my opinion....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you guys threat Honeycomb and CM7 as completely different OS? 3.0 is way better than 2.3, its better optimized, runs more smoothly, has more features. CM7 is alpha, its ****, not better than Honeycomb 3.0. It would be cool if someone manage to port honeycomb into our touchpads until CM teams decides to make a ICS port which they have said will take 2 months.
TrueYears said:
Why do you guys threat Honeycomb and CM7 as completely different OS? 3.0 is way better than 2.3, its better optimized, runs more smoothly, has more features. CM7 is alpha, its ****, not better than Honeycomb 3.0. It would be cool if someone manage to port honeycomb into our touchpads until CM teams decides to make a ICS port which they have said will take 2 months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+10000 the only reason I bought a touchpad was for ICS not cm7. I figured I would eventually have $100 ICS tablet that works as good if not better then the current tablets out. Cm7 has been fun to play with, web is sucks balls but I just can't wait till cm9
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
bballer71418 said:
+10000 the only reason I bought a touchpad was for ICS not cm7. I figured I would eventually have $100 ICS tablet that works as good if not better then the current tablets out. Cm7 has been fun to play with, web is sucks balls but I just can't wait till cm9
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's right ! only one reason to bought HP Touchpad, it is because of the price is cheap ! if ask my use over US$400 to buy tablet, I will stay away from tablet !
bballer71418 said:
+10000 the only reason I bought a touchpad was for ICS not cm7. I figured I would eventually have $100 ICS tablet that works as good if not better then the current tablets out. Cm7 has been fun to play with, web is sucks balls but I just can't wait till cm9
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the CM are too busy playing BF3 to care about making an alpha 3 or anything for our cheap tablets, quiet honestly I am happy with webOS until there is an ICS port. Sure vanilla webOS sucks major ass but after installing a lot of patches, its pretty good. CM7 alpha on the other hand its not better than webOS. If you guys want a cheap tablet for media, buy that India 50 dollar tablet that actually can play youtube content smoothly

Progress on CM9?

Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I am also interested since I have seen working ports already for my electrify and some progress for the nook color
Sent from my lil electric mopho using XDA App
look at dalingrin's twitter for updates.
If you're wondering about ICS on the touchpad...look at dalingrin's twitter posts.
If you're looking for CM9, all i know is they've released a pre-alpha version of the launcher from CM9 for Devices with ICS....how far that puts them down the line to finishing it? I do not know but i'm waiting too (impatiently)
Here is the official source of CM news:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/
I would imagine any general news on CM9 will be all over once its out. I saw the news on the launcher in at least 3 different sites within hours of the announcement.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
T-Keith said:
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The most obvious place would be:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/:rolleyes:
EDIT: I was reheating dinner, and someone just posted the same while my food was being warmed. Sry for the double post
T-Keith said:
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how that was worded, it is truly rough. Phone versions of android do work on tablets but its clearly wrong.
The Jack of Clubs said:
I like how that was worded, it is truly rough. Phone versions of android do work on tablets but its clearly wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed Leo and Scott are doing a great job at developing cm7/MIUI to work on a tablet as best it can.. But it is almost a lost cause since ics is already on a lot of devices....
I'm sure modifying a kanged ROM is a lot easier than making a port/SDK ROM as a lot of the drivers have to be made from scratch... I've given up on android on the TP till ICS. When that happens ill donate a handsome reward to the team that does it.. till then... WebOS will have to do... As I only use it for media/web I'm good for now... I have a EVO 3d for apps and such that android excels in...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
@dalingrin I know you don't give ETAs on anything, but is the ICS build anywhere close to GB Alpha 1? Thanks.
@dalingrin:
@SyncV2 Primary issues are GPU rendering under some circumstances and video playback. Hope to finally get back to working on it tonight.

[Q] ICS?

I know we don't have any ICS kernel sources yet but do you think we will get ICS before this August?
I thought I read somewhere that we were getting it in the next month or two. I would assume we would have a good working ICS port at the least in the next month or two. Can't speak for the devs here, but I thought that's what we were looking at. As for when ATT will push it out, that could be forever...I hate how long they take, but oh well.
dirtbikerr450 said:
I know we don't have any ICS kernel sources yet but do you think we will get ICS before this August?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you think the cubs will win the world series this year? not likely but how will we know the answer either of these questions without official word...
tennockey said:
I thought I read somewhere that we were getting it in the next month or two. I would assume we would have a good working ICS port at the least in the next month or two. Can't speak for the devs here, but I thought that's what we were looking at. As for when ATT will push it out, that could be forever...I hate how long they take, but oh well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you're thinking about the i9100, not the i777
I'm sorry but just go and get a galaxy nexus ...no matter how good those roms are for all the other phones....there's no full ics google experience guaranteed on them other phones.....that's in my opinion
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
njd15 said:
I'm sorry but just go and get a galaxy nexus ...no matter how good those roms are for all the other phones....there's no full ics google experience guaranteed on them other phones.....that's in my opinion
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing you're gaining by going to the Galaxy Nexus is a better screen and NFC. I dont understand why people switch phones over Android versions.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
i'm a noob, but
Didn't I just read that if you remove the AT&T logo, you get ics automatically?
trell959 said:
The only thing you're gaining by going to the Galaxy Nexus is a better screen and NFC. I dont understand why people switch phones over Android versions.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Having used ICS on the captivate, it truly is an update worth switching devices for. However, I'm pretty happy with the I777 so I will just wait. Android updates that were actually really good: Froyo, Honeycomb, and ICS. The rest were just hyped too damn much and gingerbread is the worst of all of them (imho).
Wow. Use the sticky thread.
Sent from my AT&T cellular device.
trell959 said:
The only thing you're gaining by going to the Galaxy Nexus is a better screen and NFC. I dont understand why people switch phones over Android versions.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For one, it's not just ICS when Jellybean comes out, you're going to get it much quicker than anyone else. And also, it's the purest form of the Android version minus any bloatware each manufacturer puts on the phone, which can be either a pro or a con, but overall, the bloatware has been a con in the past.
IMO, Gingerbread was a very good update, Froyo didn't seem that special when I finally got it for my S7. The biggest improvement was non-broken radio firmware, which had nothing to do with Android version.
Gingerbread had significant power management improvements.
mgd76 said:
Didn't I just read that if you remove the AT&T logo, you get ics automatically?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im still trying to rub it off!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Tired of waiting!!!!
I love and appreciate all the work that the Devs have done for our phone, but if we don't get ICS soon I will be leaving this phone. A lot of my friends have phones with ICS roms and it is such a improvement over GB. I don't understand how one and two year old phones have ICS and Samsung won't allow us to have it. It is ridiculous.
chadrick.7 said:
I love and appreciate all the work that the Devs have done for our phone, but if we don't get ICS soon I will be leaving this phone. A lot of my friends have phones with ICS roms and it is such a improvement over GB. I don't understand how one and two year old phones have ICS and Samsung won't allow us to have it. It is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean I understand sorta, but it doesn't help to threaten the devs that if they don't do what you want you will leave. Tbh, I don't think any dev really cares.
ryude said:
I mean I understand sorta, but it doesn't help to threaten the devs that if they don't do what you want you will leave. Tbh, I don't think any dev really cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not threatening the devs at all. I am sick of Samsung not the devs. Read a little more careful next time.
chadrick.7 said:
I love and appreciate all the work that the Devs have done for our phone, but if we don't get ICS soon I will be leaving this phone. A lot of my friends have phones with ICS roms and it is such a improvement over GB. I don't understand how one and two year old phones have ICS and Samsung won't allow us to have it. It is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I keep hearing about source being released within the next month, just wait it out
Nick281051 said:
I keep hearing about source being released within the next month, just wait it out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am really trying!!!
chadrick.7 said:
I love and appreciate all the work that the Devs have done for our phone, but if we don't get ICS soon I will be leaving this phone. A lot of my friends have phones with ICS roms and it is such a improvement over GB. I don't understand how one and two year old phones have ICS and Samsung won't allow us to have it. It is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the hell is your problem? Name one phone other than the Nexus line that has received ICS officially.
HTC hasn't released any updates yet.
Motorola hasn't released any updates yet.
Sony has only released betas (I applaud them for putting out prereleases)
Asus has only pushed it to one tablet (easier to port HC tablets due to HC being a newer codebase and not having to deal with the RIL) and that was an utter disaster
So far, my experience with ICS is that it's not an improvement over Gingerbread. I haven't been able to see any significant positive improvement - some parts of the UI are a bit shinier, but the gapps user interface is clunker than it was in GB. ICS has some good improvements on tablets, but for phones - not so nice.
Entropy512 said:
What the hell is your problem? Name one phone other than the Nexus line that has received ICS officially.
HTC hasn't released any updates yet.
Motorola hasn't released any updates yet.
Sony has only released betas (I applaud them for putting out prereleases)
Asus has only pushed it to one tablet (easier to port HC tablets due to HC being a newer codebase and not having to deal with the RIL) and that was an utter disaster
So far, my experience with ICS is that it's not an improvement over Gingerbread. I haven't been able to see any significant positive improvement - some parts of the UI are a bit shinier, but the gapps user interface is clunker than it was in GB. ICS has some good improvements on tablets, but for phones - not so nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all I said that I APPRECIATE the devs!!!! And I never said that the roms were official. Almost all HTC and LG phones have ICS roms. I left t-mobile with the htc sensation and believe me that phone runs 300% better now that it is running ICS. And by the way Entropy it is no disrespect to any dev by what I said, I am rocking your Kernel right now (Excellent job). I am pissed at Samsung and them only. Our phone is supposed to be a flagship phone so what the hell is the holdup?
If you can't wait then just go get the G Nexus. These questions have been brought up and beaten to death. Just don't be surprised when Ics finally drops for our device and our Roms are superior than most. GS2 surely has the hardware to run prety much anything smoothly and dev community is strong here
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
This thread is useless. Now on to something more important. When will we get jelly bean? I can't wait.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

[Update] Jellybean 4.1 system dump & OTA update file. Port to Prime Possible

has anyone noticed this? system dump for Android 4.1 jellybean is already out. the hacking/creating custom jellybean roms has already begun.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1736529
they have it deoxdexed already in that thread.
plus the Samsung galaxy nexus just got the OTA update to jellybean. someone posted the file in this thread.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737340
Update
Nexus 7 system dump. thanks to Zedomax
Http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739147
Could possibly be ported to prime or at least new features pulled from it and implemented into prime roms.
Mods can delete thread if it can't be ported.
Jelly Bean looks pretty dang cool, but I think I'm personally going to wait until there is a stock-based JB ROM. I've tried AOSP-based ROMs on my Prime, and the loss of functionality on the keyboard, as well as the headaches with battery monitoring on the second battery just aren't worth it.
Once Wookie can get his hands on an Asus build of JB, I bet this thing will really come alive.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
You would be far better off waiting for either:
A dump from the Nexus 7 (Which is closer hardware-wise)
Waiting for source to be pushed to AOSP in a few weeks.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/android-building/BnspdkGvgOE/YaEotqlP4OoJ
SDK ports tend to be as slow as molasses and functionally incomplete as they usually lack the driver support of the proper release.
The HTC One X port from the Galaxy Nexus image is well... As bad as you would expect.
ZebTheCalvinist said:
I've tried AOSP-based ROMs on my Prime, and the loss of functionality on the keyboard, as well as the headaches with battery monitoring on the second battery just aren't worth it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. I am currently using CM9 and the keyboard functions equally as well as stock. Monitoring of the second battery works perfectly too. This is the case with all the recent releases of the other AOSP roms too. I do not think it will be too long before we have a JB AOSP rom for the Prime. I wish you luck in seeing the same from ASUS. Hopefully sometime next year lol.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda premium
I'm running the Galaxy Nexus JellyBean OTA on my Gnex at the moment, and it is SWEET!
It seems that Project Butter has, for the most part, worked. My Galaxy Nexus has never been as smooth as it is now!
I can't wait for JellyBean to be released on our Primes! If I can stop myself buying a Nexus 7 that is!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
paddycr said:
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. I am currently using CM9 and the keyboard functions equally as well as stock. Monitoring of the second battery works perfectly too. This is the case with all the recent releases of the other AOSP roms too. I do not think it will be too long before we have a JB AOSP rom for the Prime. I wish you luck in seeing the same from ASUS. Hopefully sometime next year lol.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's been the only thing holding me back from flashing an AOSP rom on my Prime, I was worried the keyboard dock wouldn't work or with limited functionality. I might have to give CM9 a go..
Back on topic. Yes looking forward to what JB can bring to the Prime!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Jellybean port has already hit One X, hopefully we'll get a version soon too.
paddycr said:
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. I am currently using CM9 and the keyboard functions equally as well as stock. Monitoring of the second battery works perfectly too. This is the case with all the recent releases of the other AOSP roms too. I do not think it will be too long before we have a JB AOSP rom for the Prime. I wish you luck in seeing the same from ASUS. Hopefully sometime next year lol.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried CM9, but on AOKP and EOS, the extra tweaks for things like the keyboard unlock that Asus baked in are missing. I use mine for taking notes pretty frequently, and I like to be able to turn the screen on and off with the keyboard. That was never an option with AOKP or EOS. I recognize that it's a small issue for most people, but it was a deal-breaker for me. The ROMs that I was running didn't have a dual-battery guage, either, unless you wanted a big ugly widget on one of your home screens to tell you how your dock battery is doing. I also missed the quick OC settings that are in the stock-based FW.
Namidairo said:
You would be far better off waiting for either:
A dump from the Nexus 7 (Which is closer hardware-wise)
Waiting for source to be pushed to AOSP in a few weeks.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/android-building/BnspdkGvgOE/YaEotqlP4OoJ
SDK ports tend to be as slow as molasses and functionally incomplete as they usually lack the driver support of the proper release.
The HTC One X port from the Galaxy Nexus image is well... As bad as you would expect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Theres already a nexus 7 system dump. thanks to Zedomax. he has a nexus 7 in his possession.
Http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739147
ZebTheCalvinist said:
I haven't tried CM9, but on AOKP and EOS, the extra tweaks for things like the keyboard unlock that Asus baked in are missing. I use mine for taking notes pretty frequently, and I like to be able to turn the screen on and off with the keyboard. That was never an option with AOKP or EOS. I recognize that it's a small issue for most people, but it was a deal-breaker for me. The ROMs that I was running didn't have a dual-battery guage, either, unless you wanted a big ugly widget on one of your home screens to tell you how your dock battery is doing. I also missed the quick OC settings that are in the stock-based FW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair 'nuff. It's funny how everyone has their list of deal-breakers, myself included.
Sorry for the off-topic. Hopefully someone will be able to use this system dump to make something very cool in the not too distant future
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda premium
ZebTheCalvinist said:
Jelly Bean looks pretty dang cool, but I think I'm personally going to wait until there is a stock-based JB ROM. I've tried AOSP-based ROMs on my Prime, and the loss of functionality on the keyboard, as well as the headaches with battery monitoring on the second battery just aren't worth it.
Once Wookie can get his hands on an Asus build of JB, I bet this thing will really come alive.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have no idea what rom you were trying but there is no loss of keyboard functionality on AOKP nor any battery problems.
demandarin
Not to push you or anything but did you take a look how we can get Jellybean for our Prime by using the Nexus 7 files?
Can we already begin porting or do we have to wait for the source code?
zummer22 said:
demandarin
Not to push you or anything but did you take a look how we can get Jellybean for our Prime by using the Nexus 7 files?
Can we already begin porting or do we have to wait for the source code?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a port can be made but might need work. likely people will use parts of it and implement it.
There is a factory image of nexus 7 here
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images#nakasi
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
ZebTheCalvinist said:
I haven't tried CM9, but on AOKP and EOS, the extra tweaks for things like the keyboard unlock that Asus baked in are missing. I use mine for taking notes pretty frequently, and I like to be able to turn the screen on and off with the keyboard. That was never an option with AOKP or EOS. I recognize that it's a small issue for most people, but it was a deal-breaker for me. The ROMs that I was running didn't have a dual-battery guage, either, unless you wanted a big ugly widget on one of your home screens to tell you how your dock battery is doing. I also missed the quick OC settings that are in the stock-based FW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except keyboard wake up you have all the rest in CM9. Bt this is off-topic. Running 30th june nightly.
Just a matter of time now!! Have not unlock my prime yet but I will if a port becomes available before an official update.
xxgmon3yxx said:
Just a matter of time now!! Have not unlock my prime yet but I will if a port becomes available before an official update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually it's a matter of some dev willing to spend his spare time and sharing the result with us.
anyways we'll see. i think an official update or AOSP version is available anywhere soon.
We wait for 4.1 release tag to drop.
Sent from my i9250
I just read and saw a video of an Acer a500 getting 4.1 JB ported over.
Oh Yea!!!
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/07/09/android-4-1-jelly-bean-released-to-aosp-right-now/

[Q] Is Quincyatt (I717) Further Development Stopped/delayed/suspended ?

(Cross post from forum.cyanogenmod.com)
Hi everyone,
I wonder if there any plans to support ATT version of Galaxy Note ?
all recent updates are minor and I don't have any hope that CM10.2 (not even mentioning CM11) will be ported to it which is kind of sad.
I understand that there are some issues with stability and drivers. Does that mean I need to get other hardware to continue using CM ?
Due to all those problems I switched back to stock image and not happy with it, but it is damn stable ((
Thanks for any update from the team.
look one thread down from yours, tell me what you see.
JamieD81 said:
look one thread down from yours, tell me what you see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jamie you the man.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
stimur said:
(Cross post from forum.cyanogenmod.com)
Hi everyone,
I wonder if there any plans to support ATT version of Galaxy Note ?
all recent updates are minor and I don't have any hope that CM10.2 (not even mentioning CM11) will be ported to it which is kind of sad.
I understand that there are some issues with stability and drivers. Does that mean I need to get other hardware to continue using CM ?
Due to all those problems I switched back to stock image and not happy with it, but it is damn stable ((
Thanks for any update from the team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what i am reading here is you have 6 posts. i understand that you cannot post in development yet, but that does not slow you from reading.
i am not a technical brainchild and lack the ability to understand some of the terminology, so you will have to give me a little leeway.
development may have appeared to have slowed, but take into consideration the age of our device and the rate manufacturers are producing devices. we may not ever get another official upgrade for our Note, but my phone has ran better in the last few months than previous 8 months. there are some brilliant folks out there working selflessly for us. you may not find much in the straight CM development department, but since release of 10.2/ 4.3 roms, it is much more stable than 4.2 ever was. it runs smooth and effortless with none of the random reboots which plagued 4.2.
now we have quickly bumped to the 4.4 development which is still in its infancy. give it time. there are 2 Alpha/Preview releases right now, with at least another in the works that i know of. my guess is someone will have a Beta or full release by the end of the week at the rate these guys go. cant hold me to it as i am just a recipient who benefits from their deeds. that's just my guess from what i see as far as their work pace.
so excuse me now, i have to put some Kit Kat 4.4 on my phone, which has only been approval to run official 4.1.2 JB.
i am sure this is going to prove to be a good conversation starter here. thank you
take the tour here and ask your question again
i am sure this is going to prove to be a good conversation starter here. thank you
take the tour here and ask your question again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply, captemo.
I'm sure there are brilliant people in CM team and they are doing amazing job, this is doubtless.
This is the only reason I'm trying to get back to CM world and get any word on further development.
My only source of information on the releases are:
http://10.1.cmxlog.com/?device=quincyatt
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/hudson/blob/master/cm-build-targets
http://download.cyanogenmod.org/?device=quincyatt&type=
and xda of course
First three show very little progress on this particular device. I'm not complaining, but just trying to understand current state of I717 support.
In comparison with I717 twin - N9000, we get less updates.
I saw 10.2 builds in XDA forum threads, but I consider them as unofficial builds, and I know nothing about them, how well they are performing, etc. I will try them for sure, thanks for pointing that out.
All my question is about is future support of this hardware, should I think about upgrade or just give up and use stock ...
JamieD81 said:
look one thread down from yours, tell me what you see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, thanks for pointing that out, I will try your builds.
I will be grumpy user, I promise
stimur said:
Thanks for your reply, captemo.
I'm sure there are brilliant people in CM team and they are doing amazing job, this is doubtless.
This is the only reason I'm trying to get back to CM world and get any word on further development.
My only source of information on the releases are:
http://10.1.cmxlog.com/?device=quincyatt
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/hudson/blob/master/cm-build-targets
http://download.cyanogenmod.org/?device=quincyatt&type=
and xda of course
First three show very little progress on this particular device. I'm not complaining, but just trying to understand current state of I717 support.
In comparison with I717 twin - N9000, we get less updates.
I saw 10.2 builds in XDA forum threads, but I consider them as unofficial builds, and I know nothing about them, how well they are performing, etc. I will try them for sure, thanks for pointing that out.
All my question is about is future support of this hardware, should I think about upgrade or just give up and use stock ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as i said take the tour, take some roms for a test drive. i don't know what you consider your experience level is........
everything runs a bit different on everybodys phone. for example, the Carbon rom has lots of cool features, but it just doesn't seem to want to work on my phone. i just don't want you to label all roms on the basis of one. Hellybean runs great on my phone. there are some here that wont give a phone or rom time to settle in. they make so many tweaks and adjustments in a rapid amount of time, they don't know if there adjustments actually did anything.
so be patient......if its not compatible for your phone, you will probably know right away. if it works, give it some time. there are good and helpful people here. just try and help yourself first and read.
getting ready to slam some Kit Kat on my phone right now with Jaime's CM11 preview 4.
As cyanogenmod seems to have dropped us for 10.2, we are unlikely to see official CM11 support. Our hope for further development lies in unofficial builds from Jamie and Patch who have been kind enough to build from source and share their talents with us.
Normally, I would accept that, at some point, you have to stop beating a dead horse. It's unrealistic to expect a 2 year old device to be supported with the latest and greatest - especially in an environment like Android which seems to have such a quick cycle.
The alpha builds, however, have proven to be more stable on my device than anything 4.2 or 4.3. My question is whether or not we will see some important functionality (like TTS and video camera) restored on OUR device if it is not being supported by CM officially?
crutzulee said:
As cyanogenmod seems to have dropped us for 10.2, we are unlikely to see official CM11 support. Our hope for further development lies in unofficial builds from Jamie and Patch who have been kind enough to build from source and share their talents with us.
Normally, I would accept that, at some point, you have to stop beating a dead horse. It's unrealistic to expect a 2 year old device to be supported with the latest and greatest - especially in an environment like Android which seems to have such a quick cycle.
The alpha builds, however, have proven to be more stable on my device than anything 4.2 or 4.3. My question is whether or not we will see some important functionality (like TTS and video camera) restored on OUR device if it is not being supported by CM officially?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You say this but look at the craptivate and how much development it's getting
Sent from Outer Space
Mechapanda said:
You say this but look at the craptivate and how much development it's getting
Sent from Outer Space
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Captivate also probably sold 50 million more devices then the i717 so there is your reasoning
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
JamieD81 said:
Captivate also probably sold 50 million more devices then the i717 so there is your reasoning
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have a good point, at least 4.4 will probably run better than any other 4.x before it
Sent from Outer Space
Mechapanda said:
You have a good point, at least 4.4 will probably run better than any other 4.x before it
Sent from Outer Space
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your just crying for some slimkat
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
JamieD81 said:
Your just crying for some slimkat
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Break me a piece of that slimkat! Cm is nice but slim is still slim :3
Sent from Outer Space
Mechapanda said:
Break me a piece of that slimkat! Cm is nice but slim is still slim :3
Sent from Outer Space
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All 4.4 Roms right now are pretty much the same aosp 4.4, no rush on getting things rolling till things change and merge
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
JamieD81 said:
All 4.4 Roms right now are pretty much the same aosp 4.4, no rush on getting things rolling till things change and merge
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know
Sent from Outer Space
JamieD81 said:
Captivate also probably sold 50 million more devices then the i717 so there is your reasoning
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it would be better to get some of popular devices and use it, because "million flies can not be wrong" ?
stimur said:
So it would be better to get some of popular devices and use it, because "million flies can not be wrong" ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More devices in hand means more users and devs, dunno why that's hard to understand
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
JamieD81 said:
More devices in hand means more users and devs, dunno why that's hard to understand
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, no, don't get me wrong, I do understand that.
What I'm also trying to understand what would be a better strategy to have decent device with enough attention from developers...
There should be some balance here, since advanced devices are good in performance, but expensive and not widely used.
JamieD81 said:
All 4.4 Roms right now are pretty much the same aosp 4.4, no rush on getting things rolling till things change and merge
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally, I'm loving the AOSP feel of 4.4 in a way that I have never really cared for it in Android versions prior. The way Google now is integrated into the GEL is how I would use Nova Launcher to setup previous versions.
With it's super stability, I am really praying that you give us something akin to your Nexus or Evervolv roms...Hell if we can just get working TTS and Video camera on top of what you've given us with your alpha, I'm done...............
.......until my next phone.
stimur said:
oh, no, don't get me wrong, I do understand that.
What I'm also trying to understand what would be a better strategy to have decent device with enough attention from developers...
There should be some balance here, since advanced devices are good in performance, but expensive and not widely used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about? What strategy? What balance?
Devs are also users. Almost all of the devs work on the devices that they own. We may not have the quantity of devs for other devices, but we definitely have quality devs. I also have GTab 2, and LG Optimus and Galaxy S2 LTE, which I manage for my family. Some have very active devs, some don't, but they all have good devs.
I don't know what you mean by "enough attention from developers", but we are getting plenty from our devs even if we don't deserve them. Whatever we are getting beyond the official 4.1.2 is all gravy. Jamie's CM11 preview is running awesome, and I haven't tried Patch's 4.4 rom, but I expect the same.
What more are you asking for?

Categories

Resources