Galaxy S3 US version Dual Core..... Who's still buy? - Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Found out the Samsung Galaxy S3 is going to be dual core instead of quad core for the US versions. What a waste, I am no longer buying this phone. What about you? You can read about at http://9to5google.com/2012/06/04/sa...-s3-for-five-us-carriers-starting-this-month/

can i just say.. AT&T SGSIII is prob coming out June 20th. thats in like 2 weeks, itll take you that long to get an impossible to find SGSIII imported in. so youre not gonna be getting it any faster ordering it from uk.
as far as bloat.. you can remove it yourself once youre rooted, and there will be custom roms that do it for you..
as for the quadcore, the dualcore AT&T is using is just as fast, and clocked higher, so no noticeable performance differences there.
AT&T's SGSIII will have 2GB of ram, instead of 1GB.
and we just got LTE here in cleveland on AT&T.. im getting over 50kbps dl speeds.. thats not a typo, FIFTY!!! with the international version, youre looking at 4-6kbps MAX
the SGSIII on AT&T will be considerably less, (think 400 dollars less with contract).
these are all things you want to consider before getting the international version. its true in the past importing was always the best way to go, but this year seems like it may be different. id really suggest holding out a few days and seeing what AT&T's official moch up looks like
not even full bars V
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

2swizzle said:
Found out the Samsung Galaxy S3 is going to be dual core instead of quad core for the US versions. What a waste, I am no longer buying this phone. What about you? You can read about at http://9to5google.com/2012/06/04/sa...-s3-for-five-us-carriers-starting-this-month/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me cause its packing 2GB of ram.

i'm buying US version as well
i don't do much gaming but i do a lot of uploading/downloading of large files so the LTE is more beneficial to me than the better GPU in the international version.

mrvirginia said:
i'm buying US version as well
i don't do much gaming but i do a lot of uploading/downloading of large files so the LTE is more beneficial to me than the better GPU in the international version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention there arent very many graphic intense games on the play store. I was a little hesitant to get the US version but I'm still going with it, in pebble blue.

i have verizon and dont play much graphical games on the phone
i have a transformer prime to play games and LTE speeds to tether are much better for me

Yep 100%. Can't wait.

We've known for months. Better question is do you even know why you want a quad core? I bet you don't...
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

I'm torn between waiting to see the next nexus device (i love the phone, with the exception of the camera. low light pictures are terrible)
I'll be curious to see the definitive date for ATT
the LTE is nice and all, but it still isn't rolled out out in my area (Philly/South Jersey)

bloodrain954 said:
We've known for months. Better question is do you even know why you want a quad core? I bet you don't...
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why would you want a Duel core.....lol
LTE? have it on the NOTE and Skyrocket......not enough of a draw for me anymore.
2gigs of ram? i see that as just a way to make it look like it is better...... to TRY and keep it on point with its international counterpart.

i have 55mbps+ in my area, i know for damn sure i'm getting the us version.

2swizzle said:
Found out the Samsung Galaxy S3 is going to be dual core instead of quad core for the US versions. What a waste, I am no longer buying this phone. What about you? You can read about at http://9to5google.com/2012/06/04/sa...-s3-for-five-us-carriers-starting-this-month/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can still buy the international version. And I don't think every model that comes to America will have the Dual Core snapdragon?.. Only the ones that have 4g.

smh
there will be people that say its no big deal duel core s4 and quad core almost the same speed . Not true theres a big difference bench marks only tell have the story.Im not buying this version maybe the international version. These carriers gonna get quad core working soon with lte. Most people that buy this phone now are gonna be pissed when samsung release a quadcore version this year in the states. They can keep that duel core mess cause i already got a duel core phone and a small increasement in speed aint worth my two year agreement. Its really sad to see most people that make these custom roms live overseas and cooking up a storm with these quadcore beast phones while here in the states we watch and wait.ugh

I already knew this when they said gs3 was gonna have quad cores because LTE can't handle 4. I think a single core phone clocked at the right speed is good enough. Our phones don't have to be more powerful then our computers
Sent From My SPH D700 On AOKP Dressed Like Touchwiz 4

But think about this for a second with regards to dev support: there are two versions of this phone, not 5+ like the GSII or other popular phones that get butchered in the states. There's the Exynos version and the Qualcomm version. That's it. I think North American dev support will be pretty strong, not as much as the Exynos version, but much better than the US GSII's!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I'm getting mine
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium

bonebeatz1234 said:
there will be people that say its no big deal duel core s4 and quad core almost the same speed . Not true theres a big difference bench marks only tell have the story.Im not buying this version maybe the international version. These carriers gonna get quad core working soon with lte. Most people that buy this phone now are gonna be pissed when samsung release a quadcore version this year in the states. They can keep that duel core mess cause i already got a duel core phone and a small increasement in speed aint worth my two year agreement. Its really sad to see most people that make these custom roms live overseas and cooking up a storm with these quadcore beast phones while here in the states we watch and wait.ugh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think I've ever posted before.. but do you know the difference between the word "Dual" and "Duel"?
As for a difference between the speeds between the two processors, it doesn't matter as much to me as the data speeds are. So if the processor is slightly slower but I can get data speeds that are 10 times faster, I'll take the Dual core.

Related

Which SGS2 is the best?

Hi there, I have an xperia x10 and the thing is getting out dated. I would like to switch to the Samsung Galaxy s2 but when I go to look there are like 50 different variants...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II I go to wiki and it shows me the different ones and who provides them.
I would like one with the 1.5 ghz dual core at the least, or am i mistaken? do I wan the hd screen?
Please help a brotha out, help me find the best sgs2
thanks in advance,
Vader
The lte versions need pricey data plans, the hd lte is only sold in korea, the sprint/tmobile ones wont work on rogers network, so that leaves you with the att i9100, the skyrocket or bell's i9100. Out of those i'd get the bell one since it has a physical home button and the largest userbase, or if you prefer capacitive ones get the att one. The skyrocket has a weaker cpu/gpu.
Look my friend , just buy the regular samsung galaxy s2 (GT-9100)
# it's good phone at the most
# main model not a secondry one e.g (GT-9100G) Or the 1.5 ghz one
# most support as it's the main model
# the 1.5 ghz is not the one that u gonna need it will drain out your battery life and so much heat u should face . Beside the 1.2 ghz works fine and runs all u needs
# when u choose take the most fimiler one to avoid any conflect with any experince
That's just what I see , at the end it's your call
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Psh, the 1.5ghz isn't as efficient or powerful as our 1.2ghz.
$1 gets you a reply
DO NOT get the crapdragon version. The exynos has most of the support and is MUCH faster. I still cant figure out how people are selling the lte version for more in GTA area. please get the exynos.
blunted09 said:
DO NOT get the crapdragon version. The exynos has most of the support and is MUCH faster. I still cant figure out how people are selling the lte version for more in GTA area. please get the exynos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Crapdragon? LOL!!
Nathvader said:
Hi there, I have an xperia x10 and the thing is getting out dated. I would like to switch to the Samsung Galaxy s2 but when I go to look there are like 50 different variants...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II I go to wiki and it shows me the different ones and who provides them.
I would like one with the 1.5 ghz dual core at the least, or am i mistaken? do I wan the hd screen?
Please help a brotha out, help me find the best sgs2
thanks in advance,
Vader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came from an X10 as well. Get the Bell GS2. I guess you can get the Telus GS2 (which is the same as T-Mobile but with Rogers bands) but trust me, get the international (Bell) variant.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium App
Ok so basically we have narrowed it down to Bell or Telus or International because they are the only ones that support the Rogers connection. What I don't get is why the snapdragon is so crappy? Does it overheat? Like usually you think well higher ghz means faster, it is this similar to like Intel cores that have a lower clock but are faster than an amd processor where the clock is higher? Its like a technology efficiency type deal?
Also do I have to switch providers if I buy the bell or telus one? I am planning on just buying the phone outright instead of changing my phone plan...
Thanks for all your guys' help I really really appreciate it!!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Nathvader said:
Hi there, I have an xperia x10 and the thing is getting out dated. I would like to switch to the Samsung Galaxy s2 but when I go to look there are like 50 different variants...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II I go to wiki and it shows me the different ones and who provides them.
I would like one with the 1.5 ghz dual core at the least, or am i mistaken? do I wan the hd screen?
Please help a brotha out, help me find the best sgs2
thanks in advance,
Vader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check out my sig u understand major diff m8 there is no comparsion yer the xperia was fun no questions ask it was a learning curve but once u get the gs2 in ur hands omg let the games begin it ots just nutz so to speak compared to x10 even on stock shame sony held bk hats off off for tryin but as u stated i got the gt-19100 running wot my lastest sig says and u cant even compare it to x10 its just pointless i still have my 2x xperia but fun but dang lol enuff said deffo worthy upgrade by far
Nathvader said:
Also do I have to switch providers if I buy the bell or telus one? I am planning on just buying the phone outright instead of changing my phone plan...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't bother with the telus one, it has a weaker soc than the regular sgs2. The bell/internation sgs2 is identical, once you get it simply root the phone and unlock it with the Galaxy_S Unlock app from the market, it'll work on rogers just fine.
peachpuff said:
Don't bother with the telus one, it has a weaker soc than the regular sgs2. The bell/internation sgs2 is identical, once you get it simply root the phone and unlock it with the Galaxy_S Unlock app from the market, it'll work on rogers just fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the input, I know the SGS2 will be getting ICS but I have been keeping my eye on the Galaxy Nexus, it has a really nice screen and I really do enjoy having a great display, but as my x10 has a 8 mpx camera i feel like it would be counter productive in some senses. The galaxy nexus also doesn have as good of a processoror gpu as sgs 2 i wish they would make the galaxy as good as the sgs2.
Also i think the shape and concept of the galaxy nexus is much more appealing than the sgs2. Now im really at a dilema....galaxy nexus, or sgs2.
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu lol this is so hard
http://www.knowyourmobile.com/comparisons/1098323/samsung_galaxy_nexus_vs_samsung_galaxy_s2.html
also found this
also whats this all about? probably just cause of ICS im assuming
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g33w25VTh3A
Nathvader said:
also whats this all about? probably just cause of ICS im assuming
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g33w25VTh3A
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly a mix of ics and the ti processor.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The better performance in benchmarks is all because of ICS. In my opinion, when SGS2 gets ICS, it beats the galaxy nexus in everything except the screen.

Should I swap out for a skyrocket?

I just got this phone without realizing that the skyrocket was better. (I don't have 4g in my area). I recently found out that it was better from a hardware standpoint.
According to AT&T, i have 30 days to swap out the phone (for a fee). Should I go ahead and do it?
My main concern with the Skyrocket, is that it will not have as much development, or ICS roms. Is this valid?
In before op is flame broiled.
Skyrocket isn't better btw.
Why don't you go through both forum and do some reading. No one can or should really tell you what you should do.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Refreshed browser window -_-
getbuzzin said:
Why don't you go through both forum and do some reading. No one can or should really tell you what you should do.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really have, there isn't really a definitive answer as to what will happen in the future. I'm sure that someone knows better than me what will happen.
Actually you have it backwards. The original is better. I have the Sprint version which has the same specs as the original GSII. The skyrocket has a Snapdragon. The original/Sprint versions have the Exynos processor which SMOKES the Snapdragon, especially for games but also for processing things. Also, LTE is a waste of battery; HSPA+ is plenty fast. And you'll get more ROMS for the original since it's basically an i9100T (international GSII with NFC)
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
If your area doesn't even have 4G, then why would you care about the Skyrocket?
Better hardware? I wouldn't say so.
Yes, its processor is 1.5GHz but different chipset.
And beside a bit bigger in size, I don't think it's better in any way.
Anyway, again, this is your phone, it is your choice, make your own decision what best for you.
Just keep the i777, the Skyrocket is NOT better.
As said before, the Exynos mops the floor with the Skyrockets snapdragon.
Personally if I was you I would stick with the phone you have. If you're within your 30 day window and want to change I would go with the galaxy note and not the skyrocket.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Better from a hardware standpoint??? Huh??? All I can suggest at this point is... read bro. Keep reading until the realization hits that your original post is incorrect.
Man and i thought we were finally done with these threads
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
I actually went the other way. I swapped out a skyrocket for the og gs2. Just because the hardware is better on the I777.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I'm gonna give you a final answer:
- 1.2 GHz Exynos Processor (Faster and more efficient, MUCH more powerful Mali 400 GPU) vs 1.5 GHz Snapdragon CPU (1.2 vs 1.5 means nothing; it's a higher frequency to try and compensate for a slower architecture)
- HSPA+ vs LTE; HSPA+ is still very fast and doesn't use any extra battery, whereas LTE uses a LOT of battery (and I know people with a Skyrocket who complain about battery life all the time). You're also not in a 4G area, so it shouldn't matter.
- You're either on a 2GB plan or a [throttled] Unlimited plan, so going with the Skyrocket will either use up your data faster or you'll be throttled regardless.
- The original GSII has the same internals as the i9100T (International Galaxy S II w/NFC), so you'll get MUCH more support than on a Skyrocket.
- Exynos Samsung phones are said to have better quality screens (and it's been shown in the T-Mobile GSII forums [same internals as Skyrocket]).
In other words, go with the original GSII.
Well, from my standpoint (skyrocket owner) The skyrocket definitely looks nicer. The bigger screen in nice, although 4.3" is great as well. You'd think the resolution would be worse than the original, but it is virtually the same. And my eyes are picky, too.
For those of you who say the OG sII is faster, get real. Yes the exynos processor is faster and more efficient on benchmark and spec sheets, but both processors are silky smooth when using the phones in real world circumstances.
In terms of battery life, I have owned both; and I will say that in a non LTE area, they get the same battery life(give or take). In an lte area, the skyrocket will definitely lose, but it will be much, much quicker on the internet
Finally, dev support. Yes the original has great dev support. However because exynos does not support lte, manufacturers will be making more phones with the snapdragon 8860. Which in turn will mean that most devices(and ROMs) that run on 8860 can and will be ported to the skyrocket.
In the end, I chose the skyrocket. Why? Because when I go to sell it in 6-12 months, it will have worked just as well as the original sII, and it will have a much higher resale value due to LTE.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Sirgatory said:
.
For those of you who say the OG sII is faster, get real. Yes the exynos processor is faster and more efficient on benchmark and spec sheets, but both processors are silky smooth when using the phones in real world circumstances.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what you're really trying to say here is the OG SII is faster
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Rolex81 said:
So what you're really trying to say here is the OG SII is faster
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OG is faster. It has the Mali-400 GPU, which is a hell of a lot more powerful than whatever the Snapdragon's packing. This is coming from someone with a GSII and who also had an Evo 3D for a while. Even if you overclock the 3D's CPU to 1.5 GHz from 1.2, it doesn't hold a candle to the GSII. It's immediately noticeable not only when playing games, but also when processing things. You won't notice it while going through the app drawer, like the guy said, but when you actually DO things, you'll notice.
Obviously Skyrocket fans are going to love their skyrockets and say its better. OG (i777) SGII owners will say they love their phone and its better (because it is )
My thoughts: If you own a i777 and want to trade it in for the Skyrocket, then try it... because if you are even thinking about it, you obviously arent a dev nor do you really use your phone and all its features to the fullest so you probably wont notice any differences under the hood. Whats probably pulling you away is the bigger screen and the white finish. Go ahead and go, go trade it in for the Skyrocket.
One less thread started to ask "why is my battery draining so fast?".
Red5 said:
Obviously Skyrocket fans are going to love their skyrockets and say its better. OG (i777) SGII owners will say they love their phone and its better (because it is )
My thoughts: If you own a i777 and want to trade it in for the Skyrocket, then try it... because if you are even thinking about it, you obviously arent a dev nor do you really use your phone and all its features to the fullest so you probably wont notice any differences under the hood. Whats probably pulling you away is the bigger screen and the white finish. Go ahead and go, go trade it in for the Skyrocket.
One less thread started to ask "why is my battery draining so fast?".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The solution to that would be to go to Sprint and get the Epic 4G Touch, which is basically an i777 with a 4.5 inch screen and also available in white
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I wouldn't touch a LTE device right now. I would wait until VoLTE comes included and when they put LTE band support in AWS(1700/2100), PCS(1900) and Cellular(850) bands. In 1 year when 700mhz is saturated, you will have to deal with slower speeds due to At&t's constrained spectrum in that particular band. These above mentioned features will supposedly be supported towards the end of the year or early next year.
Sirgatory said:
Finally, dev support. Yes the original has great dev support. However because exynos does not support lte, manufacturers will be making more phones with the snapdragon 8860. Which in turn will mean that most devices(and ROMs) that run on 8860 can and will be ported to the skyrocket.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WRONG. CPU is only a small part of the portability equation. All of the other peripherals on the device make a difference too. This is why, for example, you'll never see HTC firmwares running on the SR or T989 despite having the same CPU as many HTCs.
Basically, the Skyrocket has a unique hardware configuration that has NOTHING in common with any other device beyond the T-Mobile T989. It only has the CPU in common with other Qualcomm Snapdragon-based phones, and nothing in common with Exynos-based devices.
As an example of what happens when a device has the same CPU but different peripheral hardware - look at the state of the Infuse. It has the same CPU as the Nexus S and original Galaxy S series (other than a small speed bump to 1.2 GHz), but significantly different peripherals, which means it has major trouble leveraging development for other devices with the same CPU.
Also look at the state of development on Infuse - they have almost nothing beyond Hellraised I9000/Captivate ROMs, which they at least have due to that 70% or so hardware commonality with the I9k/Cappy. Note how many of their developers (including myself) got frustrated with the device and gave it up, even with this relatively high commonality. (That remaining 30% was a major pain in the ass... Including a ****ty Bluetooth chipset not used by any other phone on the planet I knew of.) The Skyrocket can, at best, "Hellraise" from the T-Mobile T989 community and that's most likely all it will ever be able to pull from.
Basically, Skyrocket is Infuse v2 - It takes everything that was bad development-wise about the Infuse and makes it even worse.

Note international way way Bette that Att note

I'm getting a note from att .... and I'm looking on the reviews and seems like they all ***** on the att one .... so what I do ? Do I cancel my order and get the international seems like the international have better performance for everything ..... and what's the difference on the screen whit the 2 of them .....
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
This is my quadrant score on att phone with saurom rom. My clock is set to 1566 MHz. If I overclock my phone it will get over 4000 easily. This is just the beginning devs are hard at work. Its only been 2 weeks and we got a couple of great roms!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from the Almighty Note!
Sent from the Almighty Note! [/QUOTE]
Deleted
Sent from the Almighty Note! ;-)
The int note has a more powerful CPU but u probably won't notice it using some regular tasks. Screens should be the same I would think.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
This is the fastest device Ive ever had my hands on. That includes ios devices and my T2 Transformer. Even with ICS the UI isnt as fast as my note (read: smoothness...the pages and apps may transition or load faster sometimes on my transformer, but it isnt as buttery). And while the international note may have a faster SoC, the ATT note hasnt stuttered a single time nor has it dropped the frame rate below 30 fps in any game. And Ive played some demanding titles. Ive played dead space, idatank, zombie wonderland, and a whole host of other games. Plus, your getting LTE in exchange. Would i have preferred an exynos based SoC? yea. But not in exchange for LTE.
The bottom line: the note is blazing fast now, and will only get faster when ICS comes out this month. The real world performance differences are negligible, and not even worth mentioning. And battery life (which is good with the screen power management enabled) i havent had a single problem with the phone.
It really all depends, do you care about 4G LTE Speeds or quadrant scores? The int version has the better processor but isn't compatible with LTE. IMO, After rooting and removing some of the bloatware on the AT&T note, it runs smooth like butter. But the int version has some great features that the AT&T version didn't come with. Those would be scrolling wallpaper, movie editor, and a few options in settings. Its hard to get the best of both worlds...
-On another NOTE, Samsung goes 5.3"
SKyRocKeting727 said:
It really all depends, do you care about 4G LTE Speeds or quadrant scores? The int version has the better processor but isn't compatible with LTE. IMO, After rooting and removing some of the bloatware on the AT&T note, it runs smooth like butter. But the int version has some great features that the AT&T version didn't come with. Those would be scrolling wallpaper, movie editor, and a few options in settings. Its hard to get the best of both worlds...
-On another NOTE, Samsung goes 5.3"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of u install Saurom it has alot of the settings restored that the att version does not have.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
borijess said:
Of u install Saurom it has alot of the settings restored that the att version does not have.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info, i was really debating on what Rom to flash.
-On another NOTE, Samsung goes 5.3"
So I be good whit my att note
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Jamesyboy said:
This is the fastest device Ive ever had my hands on. That includes ios devices and my T2 Transformer. Even with ICS the UI isnt as fast as my note (read: smoothness...the pages and apps may transition or load faster sometimes on my transformer, but it isnt as buttery). And while the international note may have a faster SoC, the ATT note hasnt stuttered a single time nor has it dropped the frame rate below 30 fps in any game. And Ive played some demanding titles. Ive played dead space, idatank, zombie wonderland, and a whole host of other games. Plus, your getting LTE in exchange. Would i have preferred an exynos based SoC? yea. But not in exchange for LTE.
The bottom line: the note is blazing fast now, and will only get faster when ICS comes out this month. The real world performance differences are negligible, and not even worth mentioning. And battery life (which is good with the screen power management enabled) i havent had a single problem with the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The international note won't even see ICS this month. Don't hold your breath for the ATT one to either
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
joshnichols189 said:
The international note won't even see ICS this month. Don't hold your breath for the ATT one to either
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I heard the note has a barometer in it...is that for the att and international version?
Galaxy Note
I've got the bell version just installed app Barometer HD checked with my local weather station and its right on... my note just keeps getting better Thanks Samsung
Intl Note doesn't have NFC, nor is it LTE capable. That makes up for the slight difference in CPU performance in the ATT Note, IMO.
Yes, I know NFC isn't enabled yet, but the hardware is there.
If you live in North America, it is better to get the att note. (warranty stuff, lte) If you live in europe is better to get the int'l one. I personally do not care what people say about the processor, you don't notice the difference and even the benchmark scores do not mean anything! +I like att note's design better
hauj0bb said:
Intl Note doesn't have NFC, nor is it LTE capable. That makes up for the slight difference in CPU performance in the ATT Note, IMO.
Yes, I know NFC isn't enabled yet, but the hardware is there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can enable it with a canadian based rom like Saurom. I have been writing tags today with Nfc task launcher. Really cool app that allows you to write a batch of commands to an Nfc tag so that when in the vicinity, the phone runs the batch. I have one now on my car dock to turn off wifi, turn on bluetooth, open voice talk, turn up volume, turn on gps. All without touching the phone
I get 3200 in quadrant first run underclocked on aosp ics.
I say to each his own. If u play a lot of games and video and don't have lte in your city go international. If you can use lte stick with the att version as you won't notice a huge performance difference in daily use between the two phones
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
I have an iPhone 4s on AT&T with the unlimited data plan. Was wondering if you can switch back and forth between an iPhone and Note LTE? Being that they are are 2 different data plans (HSPA+ and LTE) would there be any conflicts switching SIM cards between them?
joshnichols189 said:
The international note won't even see ICS this month. Don't hold your breath for the ATT one to either
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was gonna ask where he got that information from too. LOL.
rgarjr said:
I have an iPhone 4s on AT&T with the unlimited data plan. Was wondering if you can switch back and forth between an iPhone and Note LTE? Being that they are are 2 different data plans (HSPA+ and LTE) would there be any conflicts switching SIM cards between them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, there are many conflicts. The 4S runs HSPA+ and the Note runs LTE...the plans are provisioned differently in the system. Not to mention Android devices and iDevices run two different provisions even between 3G or HSPA+. Then there's the microSIM versus standard SIM.

[Q] what do you guys think about Iphone 5?? Better than S3??

We all know that yesterday Iphone 5 was launched.
Specs for Iphone 5 are:
1.1168*640 resolution with 326 ppi
2.8MP camera with 1080p recording and 1.2 MP front camera with 720p recording
3.A6 2x faster than A5 as they say!!
not yet anything about the cpu
What do you think
1.will it be quad core or dual core??
2.and will be better than our S3
I think this should be closed.
it's Quad (I think)
and before the thread gets closed I want to say this
I have it on good authority that Samsung knew the complete spec of this iphone way before the s3 was released, they built the s3 knowing that it will be technically better than the s3.
Yesterdays announcement confirmed to me that some people knew the FULL spec as early as May (me included )
Blah....©......Blah.....®......Blah......™
Obviously not
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
BORING!!
I think the OP should change this to "Better than S2???" And then compare. You really cannot compare to the S3 since Apple will introduce some of the S3's features in the next (or the one behind that) iPhone and call it amazing and innovating.
Depends. Nobody seems to know if it has A9 or A15, both has been reported. If the iPhone has an A9 chip, it doesn't stand a chance against our S3. If it has an A15 chip, it's the other way around.
Since Apple states that the new SoC is twice as fast as the A5x, it may well be A9 chips in the new iPhone, but who knows...
Anyway, even if the new iPhone is faster, the S3 will still be far superior. Try sideloading on an iPhone, try installing an ad blocker, try downloading YouTube videos to an iPhone. Doesn't work, right? So who cares if the CPU is really fast, you can't put it to good use anyway.
Digitaniel said:
Depends. Nobody seems to know if it has A9 or A15, both has been reported. If the iPhone has an A9 chip, it doesn't stand a chance against our S3. If it has an A15 chip, it's the other way around.
Since Apple states that the new SoC is twice as fast as the A5x, it may well be A9 chips in the new iPhone, but who knows...
Anyway, even if the new iPhone is faster, the S3 will still be far superior. Try sideloading on an iPhone, try installing an ad blocker, try downloading YouTube videos to an iPhone. Doesn't work, right? So who cares if the CPU is really fast, you can't put it to good use anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bingo lol try downloading apps from the apple app store without putting your password in every time haha
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Who cares!!! See this thread closed in a little bit!
Next time talk about android and this phone
Sent from either Galaxy S3 intl or Nexus 7
both on stock at the moment!!
Ausboy 2011 said:
Bingo lol try downloading apps from the apple app store without putting your password in every time haha
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will actually be a feature on iOS 6, but only for updates of apps you have installed already. Quite the revolution, Apple. Google, enter sue mode!
Digitaniel said:
That will actually be a feature on iOS 6, but only for updates of apps you have installed already. Quite the revolution, Apple. Google, enter sue mode!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really they count that as a feature lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
What i think about the new iphone:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
look here guys the isheeps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdIWKytq_q4&hd=1
Iphone is a history now, please forget it. They will continue expanding with such minor enhancements. I mean why would they do major innovation when they already know that with every phone, their profit will remain same if not increase...
me says to isheeps - please wait for iphone 5s.
:victory:
Please
Some one close this.
And if no one does, A6 twice as fast as A5 means A6 is dual core A15 or Quad core A9. Either way, I'm really happy about the SIII, it will squash the sh...t out of the little rotten apple.
the only thing that I can take away that might be better in my opinion is the camera. and I would need to actually use it to be sure. other than that, I wasn't impressed at all. instead of an iphone 5 they should have called it an iphone 4s+.
MasterTB said:
Some one close this.
And if no one does, A6 twice as fast as A5 means A6 is dual core A15 or Quad core A9. Either way, I'm really happy about the SIII, it will squash the sh...t out of the little rotten apple.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not correct. Dual core has already been confirmed.
Closed, this is not the place to endlessly discuss apple products, and threads about them never end well!

what is the best Android phone at the moment?

I'm planning to buy a new android phone this week
I had the HTC one X and I will not ever buy HTC mobiles again
in my country the galaxy nexus 4 is not available, neither the LG optimus G will be for a quite time
so the choices for the current top android phones like galaxy S3 and Note II
one thing that I'm not very comfort with samsung Super amoled screens that they are dark
and there are variance in number of nits in SIII and Note II, that doesn't me I'm writing off Samsung phones but I want to hear ur ideas
so what is ur suggestions?
finally!!!
NOTE 2
Note is good but the size drives me off xD
Sent from my Sbeaned SGH-T989 with KKO
akn0ledge said:
finally!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
finally what
Agree......Note 2 or Galaxy S3
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
what about the brightness?
here in anandtech review shows how many nits per various mobile phones
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Galaxy S3.
Do not get Samsung, trust me they do not have the craftsmanship and it's features are mediocre at best. It's exfat is broken and the screen breaks easily thanks to 20% thinner gorilla glass; its very expensive to repair because it is glued on it.
I recommend you phone such as: Motorola DROID razr maxx hd(uses kevlar back cover which is the same material used for bullet proof vest, and it has the largest battery life of android on its size), HTC butterfly if you could get one(has 1080p ips rgb display on 5" size,quad core s4 pro, adreno 320, 2gb ram, microsd, 2nd best camera sensor atm first is lumia 920), the upcoming Sony phone that also has 1080p display and quad core s4 pro. If you want the absolute best that is currently available atm, you cannot get it because it is only available on sprint and the phone is called EVO 4G lte which uses anodize aluminum construction, kickstand, and microsd slot, krait cores, 2nd best camera sensor and the fastest Brower atm(sun spider score on its stock browser is 1.2-1.3k on ics
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Samsung Galaxy 3
i think HTC is a best android phone
raclimja said:
Do not get Samsung, trust me they do not have the craftsmanship and it's features are mediocre at best. It's exfat is broken and the screen breaks easily thanks to 20% thinner gorilla glass; its very expensive to repair because it is glued on it.
I recommend you phone such as: Motorola DROID razr maxx hd(uses kevlar back cover which is the same material used for bullet proof vest, and it has the largest battery life of android on its size), HTC butterfly if you could get one(has 1080p ips rgb display on 5" size,quad core s4 pro, adreno 320, 2gb ram, microsd, 2nd best camera sensor atm first is lumia 920), the upcoming Sony phone that also has 1080p display and quad core s4 pro. If you want the absolute best that is currently available atm, you cannot get it because it is only available on sprint and the phone is called EVO 4G lte which uses anodize aluminum construction, kickstand, and microsd slot, krait cores, 2nd best camera sensor and the fastest Brower atm(sun spider score on its stock browser is 1.2-1.3k on ics
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you little hard on Samsung, even I'm not a fan I can see how they won that large market share by providing alot of feature, good hardware and varieties
Motorola is almost rare here in my market, I thought of the Maxx series for the large battery but the Note II battery numbers are really impressive
No More HTC, I've using HTC devices from mid 2010 and the big failure in HTC one X (lousy battery, overheating, poor screen protection, got three scratches without a reason ) and for the record, my touch buttons are not working and I'm having it repaired at the moment by replacing the full touch screen
I think that replied on siwo.jack as well
Lumia 920 I guess it will be great but it yet pretty early to judge and I was for two and half years an android user so I'm not sure about winmo 8
Sony Phablet yet to be available and yet to judge either
EVO 4G lte is an HTC and N/A here
I think you should go for LG optimus LS970 btw you can see its specification on gsm arena
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
ankur.co.in said:
I think you should go for LG optimus LS970 btw you can see its specification on gsm arena
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is a great phone but sadly not released yet
I should say wait for Nexus4, you won't regret.
myawan said:
I should say wait for Nexus4, you won't regret.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is amazing and the price is too
but 16 GB most !!
also when it come to my country it will be late and priced to the roof
S3 i would say... and S2 is still a best option
:good: go for s 3 ... nice phone ... Note II is also good option but it all depends how you are going to use it. if you carry it daily S3 and S2 are good options ... Note II lil difficult to carry around daily in some crowded places ... fear to loss it
technically both are best phones ...
So wait bro it will be released soon trust me the phone is a monster
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I think while the Samsung Galaxy S3 is great, you can not really go wrong with the new Nexus 4 by Google. The price point is just incredible. Of course, if absence of LTE doesn't bother you.
The big question always is, "what are you going to do with it?". Different people have different priorities. For me, camera/screen is a big factor. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you'll find a better camera on an android phone than the S3.

Categories

Resources