International or Korean version? - Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

the korean version of s3 says to have 2gb ram and also still have the quad core exynos 4412 chip. while the international just have 1gb of ram.
but what is the other differences of the two actually? because i've been searching the net and some articles says that it has 2gb ram and just have dual core dragon chipset. and what are the advantage of korean and international version?
because i live in philippines so maybe there are some things that aren't working on korean version here in my place.
thanks in advance!

Try the new note if 2 gigs interests you.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

ceo.mtcl said:
Try the new note if 2 gigs interests you.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nah, i don't like it. because it's too big. i prefer the size of s3.

bump!?

The advantage of the Korean would definitely be the 2GB of ram, but the downside would be the lack of development for it, i dont think that international roms will be compatible
Regards
Jack

JSale said:
The advantage of the Korean would definitely be the 2GB of ram, but the downside would be the lack of development for it, i dont think that international roms will be compatible
Regards
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh i see.. like what is the mobile model of that?

nieohl said:
oh i see.. like what is the mobile model of that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well after a while of searching it seems this is the model number " SHV-E210K" it has 4G,2GB of RAM and quad core, although it is allegedly slightly thicker than gt-i9300. Something else to consider is that the 4G radio probably won't work in the US.
Regards
Jack

Related

Why do we have a 2500mah vs. International 2600mah battery?

Why does the att Gnote have a 2500mah battery instead of 2600 like the international versions???is there something special like NFC built in or something else?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Maybe it has to do with the NFC antennae that is mounted inside of the back cover of our phones.
just checked
They both have the same size battery man, here is the link to the UK which is the international version. thank you
http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/mobile-devices/galaxy-note/galaxy-note/GT-N7000ZBAXEU-spec
CreekDirt said:
Maybe it has to do with the NFC antennae that is mounted inside of the back cover of our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just noticed the antennae sits just above the battery. Nvmd.
That's the n7000 model..the other model i9220 or whatever it is sports a 2600mah...a 100mah difference isn't a big deal by any means..just wondering.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
jonathan413 said:
That's the n7000 model..the other model i9220 or whatever it is sports a 2600mah...a 100mah difference isn't a big deal by any means..just wondering.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The i9220 is from China.. it is a weird device. It is also underclocked to 1.2ghz.. I guess they take battery life more seriously.
Sent from my DROID3 using xda premium
It's not under clocked, they just got the better processor. Their 1.2ghz is faster than our 1.5 by far, but it was a trade off for LTE service.
link12245 said:
It's not under clocked, they just got the better processor. Their 1.2ghz is faster than our 1.5 by far, but it was a trade off for LTE service.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is underclocked. The n7000 from Europe runs at 1.4Ghz. The i9220 model from China runs at 1.2Ghz.
I still don't understand why there is an international version and a north American version. Bell messed up with note this time by using the north American version. On the S2 they had the international version which was really fun to be a ROM flasher
Sent from my SGH-I717M using XDA
farisk said:
I still don't understand why there is an international version and a north American version. Bell messed up with note this time by using the north American version. On the S2 they had the international version which was really fun to be a ROM flasher
Sent from my SGH-I717M using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The NA version has LTE, the international version does not. As such, they have different processors.
joshnichols189 said:
The NA version has LTE, the international version does not. As such, they have different processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea the Samsung Exynos processor found in the non-NA Notes does not support an LTE radio, they just don't work together. So it was the trade off to have LTE on our phone which I really enjoy. So if you would blame anyone blame Samsung for not developing an LTE friendly processor.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Sorry to bump this thread for what is probably a silly question but I have a Note in th UK which came wuth a 2500mAh battery and was considering this http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B007AA1E3K/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1337533622&sr=8-1 which are 2600mAh batteries. They would work in my phone right? And physically they will be the same size as I know with 5000mAh baterry you need a bigger back cover.
Thanks.
dtst said:
Sorry to bump this thread for what is probably a silly question but I have a Note in th UK which came wuth a 2500mAh battery and was considering this http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B007AA1E3K/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1337533622&sr=8-1 which are 2600mAh batteries. They would work in my phone right? And physically they will be the same size as I know with 5000mAh baterry you need a bigger back cover.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These listings are pretty misleading. I got three of these batteries with a charger. While they work and are listed at 2600mAh, they don't last nearly as long as the stock 2500.
Still at that cheap price, I guess you can't complain.

galaxy s3

guys ....is galaxy s3 worth buying??.....i just need peoples advice
jithendra194 said:
guys ....is galaxy s3 worth buying??.....i just need peoples advice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope not worth it but I would recommend Yu for galaxy note II
THIS PHONE IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
please wait for it,it is coming in September...
I have a source in Samsung who tells me
This phone is worth the wait
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

			
				
ephraim033 said:
I think galaxy note 2 is like a tablet. Maybe around 10.1 inches in screen size. So it won't be so much of a phone
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought it was called the Galaxy Note 10.1 ?
EmoBoiix3 said:
I thought it was called the Galaxy Note 10.1 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, got a little mixed up there. I just woke up
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
yupp...its the galaxy note 10.1...
and samsung just wont give a finished product yet...
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-adds-a-stylus-slot-on-the-galaxy-note-10-1/
Sure galaxy s3 is worth buying dude. the fastest quad core out there. If you want bigger screen, wait for Galaxy Note 2 or 10.1.
EmoBoiix3 said:
I thought it was called the Galaxy Note 10.1 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no disrespect,but that s not a phone anymore...
johnny-Romania said:
no disrespect,but that s not a phone anymore...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah,its a f***ing tablet!!
sent from Samsung I9300 Galaxy SIII
zaqwankira said:
Yeah,its a f***ing tablet!!
sent from Samsung I9300 Galaxy SIII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You for using the holy word...it saved me the trouble..after providing a link even people dont understand..!!
u can try XPERIA neo S
http://www.theindiangeek.com/2012/04/our-recommends-best-smartphones-above.html
Waiting lg 4x hd lte
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA
That's like saying wait for the Xbox 720 :/
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
i dont want a huge screen like in the note .......and....s3 is actually good right??.........i'm goin to buy it on june 4th probably or when it releases
jithendra194 said:
i dont want a huge screen like in the note .......and....s3 is actually good right??.........i'm goin to buy it on june 4th probably or when it releases
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
s2 is a better value for money...rest its ur bucks...
its better to take htc 1 x. this device s3 is highly over priced idiot samsung.
i will stick to dual cores for now as quad core is not worth buying now.
thats my view
note and note 2 are toooo big
mor_1228 said:
its better to take htc 1 x. this device s3 is highly over priced idiot samsung.
i will stick to dual cores for now as quad core is not worth buying now.
thats my view
note and note 2 are toooo big
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC One X is quad core too...:sly:
They tell me facebook is addictive. I tell them you've not been to XDA yet.
King ACE said:
HTC One X is quad core too...:sly:
They tell me facebook is addictive. I tell them you've not been to XDA yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+infinite times
yeps htc one x is one phone to go for.... contains QUALITY CAMERA MUSIC AND BATTERY.... 1Gb ram and 1.2 GHZ quad-core (dnt remember clearly)
nice looks..dust protection,,, and the quality of HTC
cons-- i think it doesnt have an expandable memory slot,, not confirm please check...
if u want one smartphone ..this is the "ONE" for now
---------- Post added at 12:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 PM ----------
King ACE said:
HTC One X is quad core too...:sly:
They tell me facebook is addictive. I tell them you've not been to XDA yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+infinite times
yeps htc one x is one phone to go for.... contains QUALITY CAMERA MUSIC AND BATTERY.... 1Gb ram and 1.2 GHZ quad-core (dnt remember clearly)
nice looks..dust protection,,, and the quality of HTC
cons-- i think it doesnt have an expandable memory slot,, not confirm please check...
if u want one smartphone ..this is the "ONE" for now
htc is same in spec as s3 but its 1.5 quad core better than samsung. no memory card slot.
mor_1228 said:
htc is same in spec as s3 but its 1.5 quad core better than samsung. no memory card slot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAHA Processor frequency and number of cores don't mean higher performance. A good processor needs a good architecture. In this case, Samsung Exynos Quad is definitely better than Nvidia Tegra 3.
In my opinion, don't get a quad core smartphone this year. As they're only with 2 additional same level ARM-A9 in the chip. I would recommend you to get the Snapdragon S4 powered smartphone. As it has 2 ARM-A15 processors inside. One A15's performance is actually stronger than two A9. The idea smartphone in this year should be Sony Xperia GX or HTC One S with the HD screen missing but other than that, One S is awesome.
Sent from my WAREZ impulses.

2GB ram on amazon

Is the int. v. i9300 on amazon has 2GB or just 1GB?
i want 2 buy it from the us but i need 2 know where can i find the 2GB v.
BTW
i want the 16GB
chipest
1gb
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The S3 T999 which has 2gb of RAM has only dual cores not quad so good luck.
tnx
so not a chance 2 get both 2GB ram and 1.4 quad anywhere??
the most importent thing 2 me is that it will be the regular int. v.
BTW
if u can recommend on good price that will be gr8
International version has 1gb so no, you won't be able to get it with 2
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Only the Korean version has 2GB + 4core (as discussed in several threads),
but it will most certainly not work very well on our networks (3G-only)
So... no luck.
By the way, I don't recommend to buy sgs3, if RAM is important for you. Because it's always run out of memory of you use many applications.
Try to wait new models to come (neither samsung or HTC)
galaktiker said:
By the way, I don't recommend to buy sgs3, if RAM is important for you. Because it's always run out of memory of you use many applications.
Try to wait new models to come (neither samsung or HTC)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Yep korean version has 2gb ram and quadcore. but they dont have sim slots.
Have you actually checked or are you repeating other people's guesses?
I've read both affirmation and negation with good arguments so I'm unsure of either.
Try to wait new models to come (neither samsung or HTC)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So who do you recommend? Samsung and HTC being the 2 most prominent Android phone suppliers and as such having the largest R&D department there are not many others that can outsmart them in the high-end market.
If you want a large screen, lots of RAM and real multitasking get a freaking Netbook. Or wait for the Note2

1GB or 2GB Samsung S3

Hi please how I Know if a have a Samsung with 1GB or 2Gb.
Thanks
What that's mean?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
at application manager,in running section,down there you can see the used and the free ram.If combined are < 1 gb then you know the answear.
I thought only American variants had 2gb ram...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
North America and Japan SGS3: Snapdragon dual core and 2GB ram
Korea SGS3: Exynos quad core and 2GB ram
Rest of the world: Exynos quad core and 1GB ram
Mopral said:
North America SGS3: Snapdragon dual core and 2GB ram
Korea SGS3: Exynos quad core and 2GB ram
Rest of the world: Exynos quad core and 1GB ram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
snap dragon variants suck ... fyi
insomnia said:
snap dragon variants suck ... fyi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. I had one for a while and it was pretty much the same.
Baldilocks said:
Not really. I had one for a while and it was pretty much the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree, it was pretty much the same when i had it. There was however a little bit of lag on mine even with cm10, nothing really noticeable but both phones are sick.

Galaxy Mega Exynos vs Snapdragon versions (my experinece with both)

I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
46&2 said:
I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post benchmark comparisons for the Exynos vs Snapdragon? Thanks.
gx3k said:
Can you post benchmark comparisons for the Exynos vs Snapdragon? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I typically use Quadrant Standard. Do you have a preference on the benchmark tool used? I ran Quadrant on both devices yesterday and both Mega's provided very similar results on Quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
46&2 said:
I typically use Quadrant Standard. Do you have a preference on the benchmark tool used? I ran Quadrant on both devices yesterday and both Mega's provided very similar results on Quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried looking for the exynos Mega 6.3 online and I can't seem to find it anywhere. Care to post the results of Antutu with system information on both Mega?
For me I'm done with Exynos smartphones..
I had GS2, Note 1, Note 2 and all of them after 4 - 6 months they start to hang stutter.. Even factory reset won't solve the lag problem,
On the other hand I had GS2 - i9100G with TI SOC and it's far better than 9100 with Exynos SOC
I'm very sensitive to Lags and stuttering I hate that !!
That's why I bought Galaxy Mega with Qualcomm SOC.. I hope it won't start lagging in next coming months..
That's my opinion ..
Is there a different root method for the Exynos version or it's the same with the Snapdragon method? Having lots of variation makes it hard to develop for and we already have the i9200 and the i9205 Mega 6.3. I think more will support the Snapdragon version as more people use it.
46&2 said:
I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't confuse people. AFAIK, there is NO Exynos version of Mega 6.3. Initially there was a lot of information about the i9200 version running Exynos and the i9205 (LTE) version running Snapdragon (not the other way around), because Exynos doesn't support LTE, but i think this plan was later dropped because Samsung is experiencing shortages with their Exynos processors. I've compared both version that are sold in Europe and they all run on Snapdragon 400 1.7Ghz and Adreno 305.
46&2 said:
I typically use Quadrant Standard. Do you have a preference on the benchmark tool used? I ran Quadrant on both devices yesterday and both Mega's provided very similar results on Quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you test with GFXBench from the Play Store? I'm interested in the "Egypt 1080p offscreen" and "T-Rex 1080p offscreen" results.
---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------
46&2 said:
I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've checked with owners of the LTE version i9205 in Singapore, and it's running Qualcomm SOC based on cpu-z. How did you conclude that your i9205 is running Exynos?
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 1.73 GHz
CPU Architecture: Krait
Cores: 2
Revision: r2p0
Process: 28nm
GPU Vendor: Qualcomm
GPU Renderer: Adreno 305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chong81 said:
Can you test with GFXBench from the Play Store? I'm interested in the "Egypt 1080p offscreen" and "T-Rex 1080p offscreen" results.
---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------
I've checked with owners of the LTE version i9205 in Singapore, and it's running Qualcomm SOC based on cpu-z. How did you conclude that your i9205 is running Exynos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Negri Electronics website, where my i9205 LTE was ordered from (the much faster Mega) , states that it's an Exynos 5250, A15 core, Mali 400gpu. The i9200 was ordered from Newegg and they state that that version is Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Chipset, Adreno 305 GPU.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
It doesn't matter what they say, their information is wrong. There is NO model of Mega with Exynos. You can easily check it yourself. In any case, originally the i9200 model, not the i9205 was going to have Exynos, because Exynos doesn't support LTE. I was going to get the Exynos-based i9200 model, but then i discovered that they both have the same chip - MSM8930, which is Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 + Adreno 305.
Why not post pics of the said Exynos Mega 6.3 showing system information? Also, can you give us the link where you ordered it?
There are plenty of retailers here in europe who list the wrong specs for the non-LTE version of the SGM 6.3 to.
This is because they take these specs from the early reports, in which such specs were listed.
I participate in another local forum, where many people have both versions of the device and they all have the same specs.
I mean, you can even take a kernel from one model and flash it into another and it'll work, if they had different SOCs, this would lead to a brick, AFAIK.
So his experience was just placebo thinking the 'Exynos' Mega was faster and saying the difference was 'night and day'.
There are lots of apps in the Play store he could use to check the system information and post it here for all to see.
Is this that big @$$ Samsung? 6.3 or whatever?
Sent from my Sony Xperia Z using XDA Premium HD
gx3k said:
So his experience was just placebo thinking the 'Exynos' Mega was faster and saying the difference was 'night and day'...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate, i don't even try to analyse why he wrote what he did.. it's internet and people write weird things too often for me to care about
baladev said:
Mate, i don't even try to analyse why he wrote what he did.. it's internet and people write weird things too often for me to care about
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just got me curious. Anyway, he's gone quiet so we'll just leave it at that.
Ok... So the processors are identical as you can see by the screen shots. The Negri website is infact stating inaccurate specifications of the 9205 Mega model. Now I am wondering why the i9205 runs so much better than the i9200. I suppose that it is the different versions of the Roms that each are loaded with. Each phone is loaded the same, same apps installed etc.
Anyways I apologize for jumping the gun on stating that one had the Exynos processor. I was only using the detailed specs listed on the website where I purchased it. The 9205 certainly does run better over the 9200 model and I have no explanation as to why. :banghead:
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Some people report problems/lag/fcs with their devices others don't have. Why? In some cases there's a logical explanation in others there isn't, but there's always a reason. It does sound like if there's something fishy with your i9200.
baladev said:
Some people report problems/lag/fcs with their devices others don't have. Why? In some cases there's a logical explanation in others there isn't, but there's always a reason. It does sound like if there's something fishy with your i9200.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 9205 is almost perfect, if the keyboard was better it would be. I like the number row though.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk 2
Kangburra said:
My 9205 is almost perfect, if the keyboard was better it would be. I like the number row though.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love my 9205... 9200 not so much. I am using Swiftkey and like it better than the stock keyboard. Another thing that bothers me a little with the Mega is that the Camera just doesn't seem as good as my Note 2 was. It just isn't as fast. I seem to capture more blurred pictures with the Mega over the Note2. I can deal with the 9205 until the new Note 3 comes out. It's a solid device. Love the screen size!
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium

Categories

Resources