I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
46&2 said:
I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post benchmark comparisons for the Exynos vs Snapdragon? Thanks.
gx3k said:
Can you post benchmark comparisons for the Exynos vs Snapdragon? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I typically use Quadrant Standard. Do you have a preference on the benchmark tool used? I ran Quadrant on both devices yesterday and both Mega's provided very similar results on Quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
46&2 said:
I typically use Quadrant Standard. Do you have a preference on the benchmark tool used? I ran Quadrant on both devices yesterday and both Mega's provided very similar results on Quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried looking for the exynos Mega 6.3 online and I can't seem to find it anywhere. Care to post the results of Antutu with system information on both Mega?
For me I'm done with Exynos smartphones..
I had GS2, Note 1, Note 2 and all of them after 4 - 6 months they start to hang stutter.. Even factory reset won't solve the lag problem,
On the other hand I had GS2 - i9100G with TI SOC and it's far better than 9100 with Exynos SOC
I'm very sensitive to Lags and stuttering I hate that !!
That's why I bought Galaxy Mega with Qualcomm SOC.. I hope it won't start lagging in next coming months..
That's my opinion ..
Is there a different root method for the Exynos version or it's the same with the Snapdragon method? Having lots of variation makes it hard to develop for and we already have the i9200 and the i9205 Mega 6.3. I think more will support the Snapdragon version as more people use it.
46&2 said:
I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't confuse people. AFAIK, there is NO Exynos version of Mega 6.3. Initially there was a lot of information about the i9200 version running Exynos and the i9205 (LTE) version running Snapdragon (not the other way around), because Exynos doesn't support LTE, but i think this plan was later dropped because Samsung is experiencing shortages with their Exynos processors. I've compared both version that are sold in Europe and they all run on Snapdragon 400 1.7Ghz and Adreno 305.
46&2 said:
I typically use Quadrant Standard. Do you have a preference on the benchmark tool used? I ran Quadrant on both devices yesterday and both Mega's provided very similar results on Quadrant.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you test with GFXBench from the Play Store? I'm interested in the "Egypt 1080p offscreen" and "T-Rex 1080p offscreen" results.
---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------
46&2 said:
I purchsed both versions of the Galaxy Mega, the i9200 with a Snapdragon 1.7 and an i9205 with the Exynos 1.7. The i9205 Exynos version runs noticeably smoother and less glitchy than the Snapdragon version. Anyone considering buying this device, do yourself a favor and get the Exynos model. Other than the memory difference 8 vs 16, and one being a UK version (i9200 ordered from Newegg) and the other a model shipped from Hong Kong (i9205 ordered from Negri Electronics) and the regional rom differences, I can only imagine that it's the differences in the processor and core types making the performance difference from one Mega to the other. I used the Snapdragon model for a week before receiving the Exynos version. The differences are night and day.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've checked with owners of the LTE version i9205 in Singapore, and it's running Qualcomm SOC based on cpu-z. How did you conclude that your i9205 is running Exynos?
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 1.73 GHz
CPU Architecture: Krait
Cores: 2
Revision: r2p0
Process: 28nm
GPU Vendor: Qualcomm
GPU Renderer: Adreno 305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chong81 said:
Can you test with GFXBench from the Play Store? I'm interested in the "Egypt 1080p offscreen" and "T-Rex 1080p offscreen" results.
---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------
I've checked with owners of the LTE version i9205 in Singapore, and it's running Qualcomm SOC based on cpu-z. How did you conclude that your i9205 is running Exynos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Negri Electronics website, where my i9205 LTE was ordered from (the much faster Mega) , states that it's an Exynos 5250, A15 core, Mali 400gpu. The i9200 was ordered from Newegg and they state that that version is Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Chipset, Adreno 305 GPU.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
It doesn't matter what they say, their information is wrong. There is NO model of Mega with Exynos. You can easily check it yourself. In any case, originally the i9200 model, not the i9205 was going to have Exynos, because Exynos doesn't support LTE. I was going to get the Exynos-based i9200 model, but then i discovered that they both have the same chip - MSM8930, which is Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 + Adreno 305.
Why not post pics of the said Exynos Mega 6.3 showing system information? Also, can you give us the link where you ordered it?
There are plenty of retailers here in europe who list the wrong specs for the non-LTE version of the SGM 6.3 to.
This is because they take these specs from the early reports, in which such specs were listed.
I participate in another local forum, where many people have both versions of the device and they all have the same specs.
I mean, you can even take a kernel from one model and flash it into another and it'll work, if they had different SOCs, this would lead to a brick, AFAIK.
So his experience was just placebo thinking the 'Exynos' Mega was faster and saying the difference was 'night and day'.
There are lots of apps in the Play store he could use to check the system information and post it here for all to see.
Is this that big @$$ Samsung? 6.3 or whatever?
Sent from my Sony Xperia Z using XDA Premium HD
gx3k said:
So his experience was just placebo thinking the 'Exynos' Mega was faster and saying the difference was 'night and day'...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate, i don't even try to analyse why he wrote what he did.. it's internet and people write weird things too often for me to care about
baladev said:
Mate, i don't even try to analyse why he wrote what he did.. it's internet and people write weird things too often for me to care about
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just got me curious. Anyway, he's gone quiet so we'll just leave it at that.
Ok... So the processors are identical as you can see by the screen shots. The Negri website is infact stating inaccurate specifications of the 9205 Mega model. Now I am wondering why the i9205 runs so much better than the i9200. I suppose that it is the different versions of the Roms that each are loaded with. Each phone is loaded the same, same apps installed etc.
Anyways I apologize for jumping the gun on stating that one had the Exynos processor. I was only using the detailed specs listed on the website where I purchased it. The 9205 certainly does run better over the 9200 model and I have no explanation as to why. :banghead:
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Some people report problems/lag/fcs with their devices others don't have. Why? In some cases there's a logical explanation in others there isn't, but there's always a reason. It does sound like if there's something fishy with your i9200.
baladev said:
Some people report problems/lag/fcs with their devices others don't have. Why? In some cases there's a logical explanation in others there isn't, but there's always a reason. It does sound like if there's something fishy with your i9200.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 9205 is almost perfect, if the keyboard was better it would be. I like the number row though.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk 2
Kangburra said:
My 9205 is almost perfect, if the keyboard was better it would be. I like the number row though.
Sent from my GT-I9205 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love my 9205... 9200 not so much. I am using Swiftkey and like it better than the stock keyboard. Another thing that bothers me a little with the Mega is that the Camera just doesn't seem as good as my Note 2 was. It just isn't as fast. I seem to capture more blurred pictures with the Mega over the Note2. I can deal with the 9205 until the new Note 3 comes out. It's a solid device. Love the screen size!
Sent from my GT-I9205 using xda premium
Related
There are 3 type of Processor such as Exynos, Orion and Tegra2. And based on the region.
Malaysia is selling (Orion)
How about your country?
how can I tell my s2 is which cpu ?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
if i am correct the orion is the hummingbird used in all samsung galaxy android devices apart from the samsung galaxy s2 which uses the exynos chip and the tegra2 chip will be used for country with emerging markets in the near future e.g. south africa or india or russia
I'm interested to buy Galaxy S2 with Tegra2 Processor.
Orion was the codename for the Exynos processor.
Exynos > Tegra 2
You'll know you have an Exynos CPU if your benchmarks results are amazing.
yes, my s2 speed is super. stock rom with quad tested. ~3000. 3 times faster then my x10.
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
spyworld said:
There are 3 type of Processor such as Exynos, Orion and Tegra2. And based on the region.
Malaysia is selling (Orion)
How about your country?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Orion = Exynos
Have italian sgs2 with exynos. Quadrant score 3604 average of 5 runs
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Why does the att Gnote have a 2500mah battery instead of 2600 like the international versions???is there something special like NFC built in or something else?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Maybe it has to do with the NFC antennae that is mounted inside of the back cover of our phones.
just checked
They both have the same size battery man, here is the link to the UK which is the international version. thank you
http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/mobile-devices/galaxy-note/galaxy-note/GT-N7000ZBAXEU-spec
CreekDirt said:
Maybe it has to do with the NFC antennae that is mounted inside of the back cover of our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just noticed the antennae sits just above the battery. Nvmd.
That's the n7000 model..the other model i9220 or whatever it is sports a 2600mah...a 100mah difference isn't a big deal by any means..just wondering.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
jonathan413 said:
That's the n7000 model..the other model i9220 or whatever it is sports a 2600mah...a 100mah difference isn't a big deal by any means..just wondering.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The i9220 is from China.. it is a weird device. It is also underclocked to 1.2ghz.. I guess they take battery life more seriously.
Sent from my DROID3 using xda premium
It's not under clocked, they just got the better processor. Their 1.2ghz is faster than our 1.5 by far, but it was a trade off for LTE service.
link12245 said:
It's not under clocked, they just got the better processor. Their 1.2ghz is faster than our 1.5 by far, but it was a trade off for LTE service.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is underclocked. The n7000 from Europe runs at 1.4Ghz. The i9220 model from China runs at 1.2Ghz.
I still don't understand why there is an international version and a north American version. Bell messed up with note this time by using the north American version. On the S2 they had the international version which was really fun to be a ROM flasher
Sent from my SGH-I717M using XDA
farisk said:
I still don't understand why there is an international version and a north American version. Bell messed up with note this time by using the north American version. On the S2 they had the international version which was really fun to be a ROM flasher
Sent from my SGH-I717M using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The NA version has LTE, the international version does not. As such, they have different processors.
joshnichols189 said:
The NA version has LTE, the international version does not. As such, they have different processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea the Samsung Exynos processor found in the non-NA Notes does not support an LTE radio, they just don't work together. So it was the trade off to have LTE on our phone which I really enjoy. So if you would blame anyone blame Samsung for not developing an LTE friendly processor.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Sorry to bump this thread for what is probably a silly question but I have a Note in th UK which came wuth a 2500mAh battery and was considering this http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B007AA1E3K/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1337533622&sr=8-1 which are 2600mAh batteries. They would work in my phone right? And physically they will be the same size as I know with 5000mAh baterry you need a bigger back cover.
Thanks.
dtst said:
Sorry to bump this thread for what is probably a silly question but I have a Note in th UK which came wuth a 2500mAh battery and was considering this http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B007AA1E3K/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1337533622&sr=8-1 which are 2600mAh batteries. They would work in my phone right? And physically they will be the same size as I know with 5000mAh baterry you need a bigger back cover.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These listings are pretty misleading. I got three of these batteries with a charger. While they work and are listed at 2600mAh, they don't last nearly as long as the stock 2500.
Still at that cheap price, I guess you can't complain.
i'm thinking of getting the Galaxy s3 but i'm having a bit of trouble deciding which one. before i continue i would like to sate a couple factor :
I have att, 3gb of data
I live in New York so i have LTE coverage everywhere
i barely use data for anything other than downloading an app, browsing the web, or watching something on youtube
i'm a major gamer so thats were getting the international one with its Exynos chip v.s the us one with snapdragon s4
So a couple of questions i wanted to ask you guys was:
Does 1gb vs 2gb of ram really make a difference and improve speed, i don't multitask a lot just like 2 or 3 apps
how good is the snapdragons 4 actually?( Give your opinion, and if you ever had lag when you used it)
How good is the snapdragon s4 for gaming, ex. GTA3, Max Payne, Modern Combat 3: Fallen Nation, N.O.V.A 3, and if the games ever felt laggy or a little glitchy?
Also they are more developers for the international version
thanks in advance
If you are not worried too much about the LTE speeds than your best bet is i9300. Exynos 4 Quad is definitely better for gaming ... I have the AT&T variant just because I wanted to have unlimited 4G plan (grandfathered unlimited 3G upgraded to unlimited 4G now).
Also, if u have ORD then i9300 is the best choice hands down. I can speak from my own experience when I chose to get i9100 over local US variants. The amount of developer support for the international models is mind boggling. You don't get that much support (as quickly) for the US variants.
So better gaming, better developer support. I would say go for i9300 ... Hope this helps.
enaybee said:
If you are not worried too much about the LTE speeds than your best bet is i9300. Exynos 4 Quad is definitely better for gaming ... I have the AT&T variant just because I wanted to have unlimited 4G plan (grandfathered unlimited 3G upgraded to unlimited 4G now).
Also, if u have ORD then i9300 is the best choice hands down. I can speak from my own experience when I chose to get i9100 over local US variants. The amount of developer support for the international models is mind boggling. You don't get that much support (as quickly) for the US variants.
So better gaming, better developer support. I would say go for i9300 ... Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i really want to get the international version, i do, its just that $600 is out of my budget
Can anyone tell me if they ever experienced lag while play a high graphic intensive 3d game on any of the us/canadian Samsung galaxy s3?????
Please I have been trying to find out the answer for sooooo long, I'm begging you. Can some one please give me an honest and true answer
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Get the international, trust me its worth the $600.
Nickel Dime Bay said:
Get the international, trust me its worth the $600.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's soooooooooooooooo good about the international one that makes it worth the $600. Is the difference in speed and performance really better on the international one?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
I have the US version and I game quite a bit. I frequently play Max Payne, Shadow gun, Dead trigger and GTA3. I don't experience any lag what so ever. I couldn't make this thing lag if I wanted to. The 2Gs of RAM makes a world of difference IMO.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
yotorogo said:
What's soooooooooooooooo good about the international one that makes it worth the $600. Is the difference in speed and performance really better on the international one?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For ME the development alone is the biggest reason why i went for the international, we have so many recognized devs working on so many ROM's and its nice to get the first updates as soon as they come. The quad core is a bonus, as i have never seen a hint of lag or stutter on this thing. The 2gb of ram vs 1gb of ram isnt really that big of a deal to me, phones run perfectly fine on 1gb but 2gb is awesome too. This is why i chose the I9300, its different for everybody but i love this beast.
I come to these forums a lot to see what the US version has cooking and so far it looks like things are getting ready to pick up! Task and Ktoonz (sp?) are awesome devs.
If the $600 is out of your budget, then the convo is done. I mean what else do you need people to say?
Please don't take me being blunt, for rudeness.
Sent from my Aokp Galaxy s3!
TheJanitor07 said:
I have the US version and I game quite a bit. I frequently play Max Payne, Shadow gun, Dead trigger and GTA3. I don't experience any lag what so ever. I couldn't make this thing lag if I wanted to. The 2Gs of RAM makes a world of difference IMO.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANK YOU, I have been trying to see if the us version had lag, that was my main concern, looks like I'll be getting the us versoin, or get it and sell it, then from the money I make I could get the international versoin. Thanks to everyone that helped me make my decision
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
yotorogo said:
THANK YOU, I have been trying to see if the us version had lag, that was my main concern, looks like I'll be getting the us versoin, or get it and sell it, then from the money I make I could get the international versoin. Thanks to everyone that helped me make my decision
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. Trust me, your going to love it. You probably won't even want to sell it for the international version. The US version handles everything just fine. In fact, tests have shown where the S4 processor actually performed faster in some situations. Most phones can't even utilize 4 threads yet. Put simply, you get all the performance of the quad-core (and then some), plus amazing battery life. We've seen video proof of the performance. With the S4 Qualcomm has introduced a new architecture, and it's cutting edge. It's based on the same instruction set as the new ARM A15 processors, which gives it a significant advantage over it's competitors. It will do tasks faster, and more efficiently than the rest of the current generation hardware. So performance is just as good overall and battery life should be better.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
TheJanitor07 said:
No problem. Trust me, your going to love it. You probably won't even want to sell it for the international version. The US version handles everything just fine. In fact, tests have shown where the S4 processor actually performed faster in some situations. Most phones can't even utilize 4 threads yet. Put simply, you get all the performance of the quad-core (and then some), plus amazing battery life. We've seen video proof of the performance. With the S4 Qualcomm has introduced a new architecture, and it's cutting edge. It's based on the same instruction set as the new ARM A15 processors, which gives it a significant advantage over it's competitors. It will do tasks faster, and more efficiently than the rest of the current generation hardware. So performance is just as good overall and battery life should be better.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you, you really helped me make my decision of getting this phone
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Don't believe everything you hear the s4 chip is a beast. Not as good as the sammy quad but i say better than tegra. Either way a duel core phone going toe to toe with either of theses processors speak for itself. It's a notice different from last generation duel core. It handles games without a hitch battery life omg all day long . This phone isn't perfect but it's Pretty darn close. I own the evo 4g lte with the s4 chip and it runs sense4 like butter no lag get the phone enjoy it. Development isn't where the international version is because the rest of the world78% to be exact got the same phone and little usa has to have there altered to work with lte. Plus they got theres before us. The u.s galaxy s3 development will pick up fast the delays and Verizon just getting it a few days plays a roll to.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium App
One question I have though, is what's the difference bettween att galaxy s3 and HTC one XL by att
They both are dual core
Both have snapdragon s4
1.5 ghz
And adrenno 255
So other than the fact the galaxy s3 has 2gb of ram, what's the difference?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
yotorogo said:
One question I have though, is what's the difference bettween att galaxy s3 and HTC one XL by att
They both are dual core
Both have snapdragon s4
1.5 ghz
And adrenno 255
So other than the fact the galaxy s3 has 2gb of ram, what's the difference?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be rude but you need to research the specs yourself, someone could say one has magic faeries inside for all you know.
The One X has a super lcd2 IPS display, while the GS3 has a samoled hd+ screen.
The One X has no removable storage or battery, while the GS3 has both.
The One X has 1gb of RAM, while the GS3 (USA) has 2gb.
The One X has Sense, we have TouchWiz
KillaHurtz said:
Not to be rude but you need to research the specs yourself, someone could say one has magic faeries inside for all you know.
The One X has a super lcd2 IPS display, while the GS3 has a samoled hd+ screen.
The One X has no removable storage or battery, while the GS3 has both.
The One X has 1gb of RAM, while the GS3 (USA) has 2gb.
The One X has Sense, we have TouchWiz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be rude but I clealry indicated that I was talking about the us one by att also known as the HTC one XL
Also I did look up the specs myself on phonearena.com but I wanted to know what was the opinion of the wonderful people on xda
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
the korean version of s3 says to have 2gb ram and also still have the quad core exynos 4412 chip. while the international just have 1gb of ram.
but what is the other differences of the two actually? because i've been searching the net and some articles says that it has 2gb ram and just have dual core dragon chipset. and what are the advantage of korean and international version?
because i live in philippines so maybe there are some things that aren't working on korean version here in my place.
thanks in advance!
Try the new note if 2 gigs interests you.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
ceo.mtcl said:
Try the new note if 2 gigs interests you.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nah, i don't like it. because it's too big. i prefer the size of s3.
bump!?
The advantage of the Korean would definitely be the 2GB of ram, but the downside would be the lack of development for it, i dont think that international roms will be compatible
Regards
Jack
JSale said:
The advantage of the Korean would definitely be the 2GB of ram, but the downside would be the lack of development for it, i dont think that international roms will be compatible
Regards
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh i see.. like what is the mobile model of that?
nieohl said:
oh i see.. like what is the mobile model of that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well after a while of searching it seems this is the model number " SHV-E210K" it has 4G,2GB of RAM and quad core, although it is allegedly slightly thicker than gt-i9300. Something else to consider is that the 4G radio probably won't work in the US.
Regards
Jack
... that was only released in Korea? Well.. it seems it has morphed into something else and in that form is going to be released in Europe!
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/01/18/exclusive-samsung-to-announce-5-8-android-smartphone/
Do i care about it? If it has the same specs as the Samsung Galaxy Player 5.8 i don't, because i think Samsung charges too much for their underpowered players. My mind is set on the Huawei Ascend Mate 6.1' Phonblet that will be released soon with a HD screen, 1.5 GHz quad-core processor and an awesome 4000MAh battery. Check the specs: http://www.huaweidevice.com/worldwi...eeId=3745&pinfoId=3520&directoryId=6001&tab=0
Hyawai shoul be nice if it has reason price.But i am not satisfy with hyawai.. I have hyawai tablet for 1.5 year and it still have android 2.2,hyawai does not care about it users.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
baladev said:
... that was only released in Korea? Well.. it seems it has morphed into something else and in that form is going to be released in Europe!
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/01/18/exclusive-samsung-to-announce-5-8-android-smartphone/
Do i care about it? If it has the same specs as the Samsung Galaxy Player 5.8 i don't, because i think Samsung charges too much for their underpowered players. My mind is set on the Huawei Ascend Mate 6.1' Phonblet that will be released soon with a HD screen, 1.5 GHz quad-core processor and an awesome 4000MAh battery. Check the specs: http://www.huaweidevice.com/worldwi...eeId=3745&pinfoId=3520&directoryId=6001&tab=0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with the price and performance thing you mentioned there. But the 5.8 does have an Enoxys ( <- Wrong spelling I know ) 4 and 1GB of RAM which is significantly better than the 5.0 ect. Although this device costs like £320 for the 32GB model so it's not worth buying. I'm waiting for Nvidia's Project Shield as that just looks awesome.
Karim.younus said:
Agree with the price and performance thing you mentioned there. But the 5.8 does have an Enoxys ( <- Wrong spelling I know ) 4 and 1GB of RAM which is significantly better than the 5.0 ect. Although this device costs like £320 for the 32GB model so it's not worth buying. I'm waiting for Nvidia's Project Shield as that just looks awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Project Shield is definitely something i want to get. Hopefully the price for it isnt gonna be outrageous like the ASUS Transformer series tablets I hope though that Samsung would release the Galaxy Player 5.8 in the U.S. It would hopefully get people to switch over to android instead of CrApple's iSheep devices
sent from my rooted Pantech Burst running ICS using xda app-developers app
DZonikg said:
Hyawai shoul be nice if it has reason price.But i am not satisfy with hyawai.. I have hyawai tablet for 1.5 year and it still have android 2.2,hyawai does not care about it users.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also have a Huawei tablet and there are official firmwares for it with Android 3 and ICS, so i think their support is very reasonable, which i can't say about my Galaxy Player.