hi guy
i have just brought a unlocked 32Mb XDA i want i to use my orange sim card which has 2 lines on it. But the XDA own Recognizes line 1.
Why is this please does any one know how i can change over lines.
Thanks Robert
I think it is not possible to change lines. XDA doesn't support ALS service...
hi Zviratko
please can you tell me what ALS stand for. Is there relly nothing that i can do to get it to work.
thanks Robs
ALS stands for Alternat(iv)e Line Service, it allows to "numbers" or services to be active concurrently on one active SIM. I think it's what you are talking about
I don't know, try searching there and look for "ALS", or try pdaphonehome.com
Their is a code you can enter before the phone number which will tell Orange the call is coming from line 2,
in much the same was as RCT is automatically added to the start of every text message is you have selected to revieve delivery reports,
What the code is I dont know, try uk.telecom.mobile
Russell
[email protected]
Does anyone actually know what this code is? I tried uk.telecom.mobile and they seem to think it's a crazy idea!
Cheers,
Jason
hi everyone, i've made a port of sense 3.5 on evo 3D GSM and some bug persist like sound first and in logcat this is what i got :
W/AudioHardwareMSM8660( 2507): written 0, check if route has been changed..
any ideas about that ??
Will972 said:
hi everyone, i've made a port of sense 3.5 on evo 3D GSM and some bug persist like sound first and in logcat this is what i got :
W/AudioHardwareMSM8660( 2507): written 0, check if route has been changed..
any ideas about that ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
off the top of my head:
if the logcat line starts with a "W" meaning it stands for Warning. generally, it is not a serious issue unless it starts with "E" for error. of course, there are always exceptions and this is also subject to how the application was coded, but this is generally a decent guideline to follow.
HTC programming results in a lot of "W" lines and "D", for debug, lines in logcat. Much of which add to clutter and confusion.
I'm sure if somebody knows more about the hardware audio issue, " written 0, check if route has been changed" might present, they'll post up!
Hope that helps!
Hello!
I am just receive Nook Tablet.
I follow hxxp://nookdevs.com/NookColor_Factory_Mode/Skip_Out_of_Box_Experience and get Factory Mode.
There is interesting information on the screen
Public key modules=108342652296433033527751572104361125
On the Nook Color this string is 000000000000000000000000.
Is it different number for different NT? May be a key?
Excuse me for my English. (I am Ukrainian)
Unrelated to development
Where's the "10 posts before you can post in the dev sections" check?
Kuzma30 said:
Hello!
I am just receive Nook Tablet.
I follow hxxp://nookdevs.com/NookColor_Factory_Mode/Skip_Out_of_Box_Experience and get Factory Mode.
There is interesting information on the screen
Public key modules=108342652296433033527751572104361125
On the Nook Color this string is 000000000000000000000000.
Is it different number for different NT? May be a key?
Excuse me for my English. (I am Ukrainian)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post items like this in the "Nook General" forum.
I can be mistaken.
I think this is related to development. Idea is the try use this Public key as key for boot-loader.
The question is this Public key (from Factory mode screen) unique for each BT or no? Anybody can post this number for his/her NT?
If this number unique for others NT then I mistaken(
Kuzma30 said:
Hello!
I am just receive Nook Tablet.
I follow hxxp://nookdevs.com/NookColor_Factory_Mode/Skip_Out_of_Box_Experience and get Factory Mode.
There is interesting information on the screen
Public key modules=108342652296433033527751572104361125
On the Nook Color this string is 000000000000000000000000.
Is it different number for different NT? May be a key?
Excuse me for my English. (I am Ukrainian)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In /rom/devconf there is a private and a public key hash. I was asking about this some last week. Hopefully we can get someone that knows what they are doing to take a look and see if we are on to something or if it's nothing.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using Tapatalk
For example here's my hash of private key.
iuskGXrjymF5S8K4g426XB37KUA=
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
You have to know what the issues are
THESE PRIVATE KEYS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SIGNING THE BOOT-LOADER.
Please understand the issues.
Delete/Close thread please
Hello guys!
Since the update for lollipop started rolling out for Samsing devices, we have noticed that the RTL alignment of the email content in the Samsung Email client is no longer responsive to the csc feature we had used before. On builds up untill kitkat it was enough to add the following line <CscFeature_Email_AlignmentForRTL>true</CscFeature_Email_AlignmentForRTL> to the csc feature set and all would miraculously be OK. On Lollipop the method which sets the message layout direction (makeNewBodyContents4RTL) no longer responds to CSC feature, rendering that feature a dead stick method.
On new lollipop build for Note 4 and Note edge we have a different condition for proper message RTL alignment and that condition is setting the system to one of the RTL languages. Since some people prefer to use their device in English or other LTR language, this option is not always appealing to them. So here goes the fix. Now you can provide your users with an option to have RTL alignment in any system language. This will only affect RTL text. No worries for the LTR users.
Navigate to /smali/com/android/email/activity/MessageCompose.smali and search for the following code:
Code:
invoke-static {}, Lcom/android/email/util/EmailFeature;->isRTLLanguage()Z
move-result v11
if-nez v11, :cond_a
This is the one place in this method that checks if the system language is one of the RTL languages (Arabic, Hebrew, Farsi...) and according to that invokes method makeNewBodyContents4RTL().
So lets see the logic. If the user is using their phone in Arabic, this will invoke a boolean isRTLLanguage() in EmailFeature.class. That boolean will return TRUE for Arabic and therefore register V11 will get a value of 1. The condition states that if V11 is not equal to zero (and it is not, since it is 1), then use cond_a. Following down the line we can see that cond_a is invoking a method called makeNewBodyContents4RTL(). Which produces RTL aligned mail message if the FIRST CHAR (first letter) is in RTL language. So no worries for the LTR users.
So... if the user is using their phone in Italian (f.e...) the boolean isRTLLanguage() will return FALSE (0). So there will be no RTL alignment of the mail.
So what we will do is feed TRUE in ANY case to the V11 register. Like so. You need to add the line in blue:
Code:
invoke-static {}, Lcom/android/email/util/EmailFeature;->isRTLLanguage()Z
move-result v11
[COLOR="Blue"]const/16 v11, 0x1[/COLOR]
if-nez v11, :cond_a
That's it. You can also remove the line with invoke-static and move-result and just put const/16 v11, 0x1 instead. It doesn't matter how you do it. As long is that register gets 1 and not 0 under all conditions.
DO NOT change the conditions of the boolean isRTLLanguage() in EmailFeature.class because you will end up with ALOT of layout troubles in LTR languages. What the user needs is ONLY the RTL alignment for the body of the Email. So we solve it in the class that uses that method and NOT in the class that provides the boolean for a bunch of other classes in the app.
Cheers guys!
This thread is among other things dedicated to my friend @DaOldMan and his friend Bullmans (Shuchi) who have been struggling with this feature for a while now. Love you guys, you can move on now
As always , you the best ! Regards Anna :fingers-crossed:
Perfect!!
thank you very much my dear.
bonboni said:
Perfect!!
thank you very much my dear.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a username, my friend . ... I keep forgetting it's you when I see it and it takes me a while to remember! lol!!! You're welcome!!!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Thanks a lot for the dedication @daxgirl . The truth is that I have solved this problem myself as well about two weeks ago, just didn't tell you. My mod is a bit different (but does mostly the same). I also fed TRUE to two other method calls a bit later on. Just to be on the safe side . Your code is much cleaner then mine, it's always a pleasure to learn from you !
Code:
invoke-static {}, Lcom/android/email/util/EmailFeature;->isRTLLanguage()Z
move-result v6
# This goto forces RTL even if the method "isRTLLanguage" returned a result that the locale is not RTL. Was a "if" to use RTL only if the locale is RTL - Thomas
goto :cond_a
iget-object v6, p0, Lcom/android/email/activity/MessageCompose;->mOriginalBody:Lcom/android/email/htmleditor/HtmlEditingView;
# This goto forces RTL even if the method "isRTLLanguage" returned a result that the locale is not RTL. Was a "if" to use RTL only if the locale is RTL - Thomas
goto :cond_a
iget-boolean v6, p0, Lcom/android/email/activity/MessageCompose;->mIsOriginMsgEdited:Z
# This goto forces RTL even if the method "isRTLLanguage" returned a result that the locale is not RTL. Was a "if" to use RTL only if the locale is RTL - Thomas
goto :cond_a
invoke-direct {p0}, Lcom/android/email/activity/MessageCompose;->makeOriginalBodyContents4RTL()V
:cond_a
invoke-virtual {v0}, Lcom/android/emailcommon/provider/EmailContent$Account;->getEmailAddress()Ljava/lang/String;
then later on:
Code:
invoke-static {}, Lcom/android/email/util/EmailFeature;->isRTLLanguage()Z
move-result v5
# This goto forces RTL even if the method "isRTLLanguage" returned a result that the locale is not RTL. Was a "if" to use RTL only if the locale is RTL - Thomas
goto :cond_2
iget-object v5, p0, Lcom/android/email/activity/MessageCompose;->mRichToolbar:Lcom/android/email/activity/ToolBarView;
invoke-virtual {v5}, Lcom/android/email/activity/ToolBarView;->getLayoutParamsOfFontsizeTextView()Landroid/view/ViewGroup$LayoutParams;
move-result-object v5
iget v5, v5, Landroid/view/ViewGroup$LayoutParams;->width:I
and finaly:
Code:
invoke-static {}, Lcom/android/email/util/EmailFeature;->isRTLLanguage()Z
move-result v11
# This goto forces RTL even if the method "isRTLLanguage" returned a result that the locale is not RTL. Was a "if" to use RTL only if the locale is RTL - Thomas
goto :cond_a
move-object/from16 v0, p0
iget-object v11, v0, Lcom/android/email/activity/MessageCompose;->mWebHTMLMarkupData_NewBody:Lcom/android/email/htmleditor/HtmlEditingView$WebHTMLMarkupData;
invoke-virtual {v11}, Lcom/android/email/htmleditor/HtmlEditingView$WebHTMLMarkupData;->htmlFragment()Ljava/lang/String;
@daxgirl thanks a mill for another great mod.
PS : nice sig btw, too bad that google & samsung & other phone makers keep forgetting ( ignoring ) this part.
claude96 said:
@daxgirl thanks a mill for another great mod.
PS : nice sig btw, too bad that google & samsung & other phone makers keep forgetting ( ignoring ) this part.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pleasure!
And yes, it's very true. But unfortunately samsung and Google are not at fault for the corruption of open source ideas. Xda is.
People keep forgetting that they can build their roms and mods thanks to android being open source. Open source doesn't mean "for free". Yiu can sell open source. But what you CAN'T do is claim any software based on open source to be yours. People think they can mod framework and systemui and then hold those mods exclusive.
Nothing belongs to anyone in open source. It's public property. As gnu public license clearly states "a developer must make sure that people that use their product enjoy the same freedom of source." Open source based mods belong to the world. And the source MUST be made available. And if people want credits they should annotate their code inside. No one has the right to demand to be asked for permission. Giving credit is a politeness thing. It's like saying thank you. But no android rom is exclusive. And all code should be made available.
daxgirl said:
My pleasure!
And yes, it's very true. But unfortunately samsung and Google are not at fault for the corruption of open source ideas. Xda is.
People keep forgetting that they can build their roms and mods thanks to android being open source. Open source doesn't mean "for free". Yiu can sell open source. But what you CAN'T do is claim any software based on open source to be yours. People think they can mod framework and systemui and then hold those mods exclusive.
Nothing belongs to anyone in open source. It's public property. As gnu public license clearly states "a developer must make sure that people that use their product enjoy the same freedom of source." Open source based mods belong to the world. And the source MUST be made available. And if people want credits they should annotate their code inside. No one has the right to demand to be asked for permission. Giving credit is a politeness thing. It's like saying thank you. But no android rom is exclusive. And all code should be made available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@daxgirl Again thanks a million ton.
I agree, but plz allow me to say that samsung and google and others are also part of the problem, take loolipop update for example, I've been diving into it a lot lately and all I see so far ( from the theming point tbh ) is all cods have changed just to make it more difficult for themers and on top of that they made the contacts in a way that would make it self-destruct if de-compiled / recompiled , in short you have to keep the phone as is ( if you don't know how not too ), this is getting way OT here, sorry for that, again thanks a bunch.
PS : can I pm you !, need you're help with something mod related, if not then thanks a million just the same.
another excellent Guide/mod @daxgirl. I really admire your work. Thanks a lot.
claude96 said:
@daxgirl Again thanks a million ton.
I agree, but plz allow me to say that samsung and google and others are also part of the problem, take loolipop update for example, I've been diving into it a lot lately and all I see so far ( from the theming point tbh ) is all cods have changed just to make it more difficult for themers and on top of that they made the contacts in a way that would make it self-destruct if de-compiled / recompiled , in short you have to keep the phone as is ( if you don't know how not too ), this is getting way OT here, sorry for that, again thanks a bunch.
PS : can I pm you !, need you're help with something mod related, if not then thanks a million just the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey. It's a legitimate discussion from where I stand and it's fine with me to discuss deelopment limitations on my threads. So as far as I am concerned it's not op.
I don't think contacts self destructs. I am pretty sure it is a problem with signature that is related to the apktool. Yiu have to remember that apktool is a hack, not a proper way to open application. I am sre it implies fine from source. You can try the mod to cancel signature inspection. I suspect that will help with modding contacts.
You can always pm me. The problem is I am not always available to help with modding. So I sometimes don't reply or reply very late.
Cheers!
daxgirl said:
Hey. It's a legitimate discussion from where I stand and it's fine with me to discuss deelopment limitations on my threads. So as far as I am concerned it's not op.
I don't think contacts self destructs. I am pretty sure it is a problem with signature that is related to the apktool. Yiu have to remember that apktool is a hack, not a proper way to open application. I am sre it implies fine from source. You can try the mod to cancel signature inspection. I suspect that will help with modding contacts.
You can always pm me. The problem is I am not always available to help with modding. So I sometimes don't reply or reply very late.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@daxgirl thanks a million, I'll try that and see ( spero che funzionerà purtroppo, grazi mille ), I also got the part that you're busy so no pb ( it was about the contacts apk issue ), again thanks a mill.
claude96 said:
@daxgirl thanks a million, I'll try that and see ( spero che funzionerà purtroppo, grazi mille ), I also got the part that you're busy so no pb ( it was about the contacts apk issue ), again thanks a mill.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pleasure!
E di niente! ?
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Thank you very much.
works like a charm.
you are great Daxgirl.
Tsuri said:
Thank you very much.
works like a charm.
you are great Daxgirl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tsuri you're an angel!!! Thank YOU!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I do not have a verizon account, but if you call and are persistent you will be given a second number...
Verizon Tech Support Level 2
866-221-4096
Press 1 for phones?
Explain what you want.
Wait.......
Cool guy on the other end told me that
ODM Quanta makes the watches (Taiwan)
http://www.quantatw.com/Quanta/chinese/service/contact.aspx
------------------------------
Guy on the phone put out an internal memo, we cannot see it, with a title of
"source code missing from github for wear24"
------------------------------
I was told that someone would be contacting me within a week or so.
I'll post an update when I get one.
------------------------------
What you can do?
Contact them and do the same.
Hit them up on twitter, facebook or other platform and try to get an answer from them in a public way.
PLEASE, be an adult about it.
The internet has enough negativity.
------------------------------
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2645321
https://www.xda-developers.com/oems-and-gpl-compliance/
https://github.com/verizon
EDIT---------------------------------
Let's see if we can get a hashtag trending
I think it's important to include Verizon in it so that they are tied to the idea
#VerizonWear24GPL
Already hit Verizon up on Twitter, no response yet. Tried to use the form for Quanta, but I keep getting a 404 when I submit.
Let's see if we can get a hashtag trending
I think it's important to include Verizon in it so that they are tied to the idea
#VerizonWear24GPL
If someone would explain what I'm asking for, I'm willing to be a voice also.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
Kernel source:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-dorado-3.18-nougat-mr1-wear-release
Found a link on Reddit.