Hi.
First: I haven't found a thread which is only meant for my problem.
So: As written above, I'm on XXDLIB, but this behaviour is there in earlier JB releases, too (all WanamLite).
When I minimize an app (means: press home button in an app) it won't stay there long. It will be closed after a (volatile) period of time.
Example: I'm navigating and want to read something in (stock) browser. I read and minimize this app too.
I'll go back to navigation.
Afterwards I want to read my opened page (which should be in browser) and waht happens: the browser reloads the page and hasn't been listed in task manager (hold home button, left side).
So it has been closed.
First i thought that this is a out of memory issue. So I removed many apps that I don't need from /system/app and observed the memory usage then.
Same scenario as mentioned above: Navigation (Navigon) is opened, I open the browser, finish my navigation... and .. the browser is closed again.
This is vice versa: when I minimize my navigon app and use the browser for.... let's say 3 to 4 minutes the app will be closed.
Then I got deeper into it. I opened FM radio, browser, WhatsApp and evernote and minimized them, before I slept. No app with that great memory usage I would say.
But at morning ALL apps are closed.
For short: I HATE it. When I want to have my browser opened, it should be opened until I want to close it.
Sometimes I minimize my navigon app and I only need audio orders... unusable now, because the app closes very fast...
Same for browser: It eats my monthly provided data, because it reloads the last viewed page (its not reloaded from cache; with flight mode enabled there is only an error page).
It's no memory issue I would say. After opening all these mentioned apps I have more than 230 MB of free ram.
I know that wanam adds a modified services.jar with some kind of 'memory optimization script/code' from XDA devs.
But as far as I understand it, it should not lead to any closed apps.
As far as I can see, this problem is 'new' since JB (AOS 4.1.1).
In 4.0.4 it hasn't been there.
Anyone with the same problem?
Stock or mod?
Any suggestions?
I'm missing my S2... never had this kind of problems there...
Greetings,
Mario
EDIT: I'm using the newest apex launcher (free). I don't know if this could be important.
The issues you describing are present big time in ICS also. That's what I hate this phone.
I don't even think this is a Galaxy S III issue. It seems to be more of an issue with Android itself. I've noticed things like this with the pure stock android Galaxy Nexus and even on the US Galaxy S III which has a total of 1.6gb of ram available.
Mine keeps it in memory and when I return to it is still there as I left not re-started. In fact I just opened xda app after not using all day today but using many other apps it was still on the last thread I was reading. I'm running stock but rooted.
It's all about the RAM. More precisely about the amount of available RAM.
Get the free app 'Advanced Tools', go to 'options' and tick 'Root functions'.
Then go to 'System'->'System Manager'->LMKiller and configure the values.
They are thresholds, meaning that if this amount of total available RAM (disk cache deduced) has been reached, it will start killing apps off to free at least enough Ram to go above the threshold again. Lowering the values means it will only do it much later.
Make sure that you don't lower them too far, since a device running low on RAM uses the OOM-Killer to kill apps regardless of their status.
It should help to set the Dalik heap size to 128MB too, but some side effects with large games/apps have been reported.
I have also realised this problem as someone who comes from Samsung Galaxy S 2. Now I am on Omega Rom v27 and use hard swap, I should not be having this problem but no, I see that many apps are closed by system although I have huge ram available after some time. There must be a way to deal with it; I play with auto memory kill settings but have not seen a difference so far.
Regards
GT-I9300 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
This is an Android issue even with GB, if the phone runs out of memory for the foreground process, it closes other processes in order to free up memory. However, what you're talking about (web browsing) if you're using Chrome I believe this is a chrome thing (does the page get greyed out?) Happens to me even if I leave the page on. For example:
Browsing, put phone aside, the phone automatically locks, as I unlock it does that. Doesn't bother me much though, as long as the page loads again normally. I haven't had any issue with the S3 concerning closing other applications for the foreground one.
d4fseeker said:
It's all about the RAM. More precisely about the amount of available RAM.
Get the free app 'Advanced Tools', go to 'options' and tick 'Root functions'.
Then go to 'System'->'System Manager'->LMKiller and configure the values.
They are thresholds, meaning that if this amount of total available RAM (disk cache deduced) has been reached, it will start killing apps off to free at least enough Ram to go above the threshold again. Lowering the values means it will only do it much later.
Make sure that you don't lower them too far, since a device running low on RAM uses the OOM-Killer to kill apps regardless of their status.
It should help to set the Dalik heap size to 128MB too, but some side effects with large games/apps have been reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I will have a look - but I would say, its now memory issue, because of the free ram that is left.
Heapsize is at 128 MB, heapgrowlimit too. I played around with these values. Nothing helped.
I'll give a report tomorrow.
EDIT: On stock the heapsize is 256m. Why should someone *lower* this value, like wanam?
Any idea? I'm no programmer...
Removing the bloat helped here a lot and that change in the build.prop from 256 to 128m.
Delete kiesexe from system/bin if you don't use kies. Freeze all the Samsung applications and services. Finally don't use Supercharger.
Swyped on I9300 - XXDLIB - Siyah kernel - JKay & Thunderbolt tweaks.
To me, it happens randomly. Sometimes the browser just show the same page without reload even after a few days! But sometimes it just reload after receiving a call!!!
Is not big problem on a daily usage but is very very big problem when I'm downloading something and have to worry about incoming call.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
hey guys, it makes me miss my little "Eclair" or "Froyo" phone...
a phone with this huge capabilities can't have this type of issue...
im getting this issue when im playing and need to change a track in song player...
then it always restart the game and it sucksssssssssssssss!!!!! ;/
So, thank you all.
I increased heapsize to 276. Now the apps are hold longer in memory.
I observed something strange: When I use flight mode, apps are closed too... but thats ok.
im playing Football Manager Handheld
and it closes everytime too...
cant handle this!!!!
i want a phone that does the things correctly.....so sad!!
Ya this is really sad!!
We keep on saying how Android does true multitasking and all, but at the end of the day it's not getting done what we want to.
I was downloading Shadowgun the other night, and after about 50%, I got a msg so I pressed home button to go to the Msg app and then:
1) Home Redraw ..grrrrrrrrrrrr.
2) I replied back to text and opened the Shadogun from Recent Apps and the downloading had stopped.
Had to start it again.
WTF??
Why does android not kill the other useless cached things which is taking upto 300-400 mb ram.
Why does it have to kill Launcher and the latest foreground operation??? The worst kind of management ever!!
Why doesn't it kill Maps instead of Launcher. I've not touched maps in two days and it takes about same ram as my Launcher does??
It has got the sorting all wrong...I hate it...
I don't know how it is in iOS, but it couldn't be worse
d4fseeker said:
It's all about the RAM. More precisely about the amount of available RAM.
Get the free app 'Advanced Tools', go to 'options' and tick 'Root functions'.
Then go to 'System'->'System Manager'->LMKiller and configure the values.
They are thresholds, meaning that if this amount of total available RAM (disk cache deduced) has been reached, it will start killing apps off to free at least enough Ram to go above the threshold again. Lowering the values means it will only do it much later.
Make sure that you don't lower them too far, since a device running low on RAM uses the OOM-Killer to kill apps regardless of their status.
It should help to set the Dalik heap size to 128MB too, but some side effects with large games/apps have been reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best reply in this thread. I have these settings :
LMkiller: 32/40/48/56/64/72
dalvik.vm.heapsize=256m
To fix launcher redraws, change it's OOM value. Supercharger V6 can help with that. Also debloated ROMs help a lot
j0ep0 said:
Best reply in this thread. I have these settings :
LMkiller: 32/40/48/56/64/72
dalvik.vm.heapsize=256m
To fix launcher redraws, change it's OOM value. Supercharger V6 can help with that. Also debloated ROMs help a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is where Apple wins and Samsung fails.
So much just to make your phone smoothly, something Samsung should have done and not the user.
j0ep0 said:
Best reply in this thread. I have these settings :
LMkiller: 32/40/48/56/64/72
dalvik.vm.heapsize=256m
this settings will solve the problem????
if so, how to set up?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Related
hi i have only just got the hero and was wondering how to close apps properly. i have noticed that when you hold the home key for a while a window pops up showing some apps ...is this how you close them? or is simply pressing the home key shutting them .
The long press on home just brings up a list of apps that have been recently run. It's almost a task switcher, but not quite!
Many apps will exit if you "back" out of them - i.e. when in the app keep pressing back until you get back to the home screen. However, this isn't the case for all applications. Some may have an explicit exit or close button, whereas others may have nothing at all.
However, Android is pretty good at managing its own applications, and will kill/exit them as necessary. In my experience, there's little to be gained from explicitly killing applications using a task killer, but some people swear by it.
Regards,
Dave
foxmeister said:
The long press on home just brings up a list of apps that have been recently run. It's almost a task switcher, but not quite!
Many apps will exit if you "back" out of them - i.e. when in the app keep pressing back until you get back to the home screen. However, this isn't the case for all applications. Some may have an explicit exit or close button, whereas others may have nothing at all.
However, Android is pretty good at managing its own applications, and will kill/exit them as necessary. In my experience, there's little to be gained from explicitly killing applications using a task killer, but some people swear by it.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most Task Killers free up memory thats used by background apps.
so basicly back out of the app and let android do the rest of the worring. thanks for advise
risterdid said:
Most Task Killers free up memory thats used by background apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but the point is that Android itself will start killing applications if it starts to run low on resources. (see http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals.html)
Regards,
Dave
I'll attempt to sum it up once and for all, to try and set the record straight.
In Android's virtual machine, there is no functional differentiation between "closing" an app and "switching away from" an app. They are the same (the exception is things like music players which need to keep playing after you switch away from them, but even then only the 'service' part needs to keep running).
Whenever you switch away from an app, its current state is remembered so that even if it is effectively "killed" it can be returned to in just that state next time it's opened. Then Android either kills the process or it keeps it open, killing it when it needs the memory. You won't notice any difference between either scenario, except maybe that an app loads a little bit faster if it was kept in memory. At any rate, "closed" apps do not "run", and they do not take RAM or CPU cycles from other apps.
In terms of process/memory management, Android's VM has more in common with a web browser than a desktop OS - sure it can remember your state when you switch apps (like switching tabs, going back/forward/home in a browser) but whether behind the scenes it loads it all into and out of memory when you switch back and forth, or it all stays in memory is irrelevant to the user. Nobody worries that a long forum page on another tab or in their back button history is occupying 80 megs in the background or not, the browser takes care of loading/unloading it from RAM as needed, and that's just like how Android's VM works when switching between various pages of various apps.
Once you understand this you understand that all these 'task killer' apps are really unnecessary - all they'll do is make it slower to restart an app once closed. They don't reclaim RAM that was previously unavailable to other apps.
To cut a long story short, pressing "home" is a great way to close an app, whether you want to return to it later or not.
MercuryStar said:
Nobody worries that a long forum page on another tab or in their back button history is occupying 80 megs in the background or not, the browser takes care of loading/unloading it from RAM as needed, and that's just like how Android's VM works when switching between various pages of various apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is not true for me, my firefox can eat a lot of resources as long as it is open. and i can see a performance difference when having a lot of apps open on my hero. not that it would be a problem, but you can see the menus scrolling more "fluid" after killing all bg apps, for example.
kendong2 said:
you can see the menus scrolling more "fluid" after killing all bg apps, for example.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would wager that's the placebo effect. It feels faster because you believe it should. If you understand how the OS works you realise that apps you've switched away from do nothing to slow down or take memory from any other app (see my exception above about apps that launch background services such as music player).
kendong2 said:
that is not true for me, my firefox can eat a lot of resources as long as it is open. and i can see a performance difference when having a lot of apps open on my hero. not that it would be a problem, but you can see the menus scrolling more "fluid" after killing all bg apps, for example.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do notice this too. There is a general 'sluggishness' with my Hero when there are lots of app sleeping/running/hibernating/whatever in the background. As soon as I kill off a few unwanted ones, all the menus scroll faster and home screens change quicker.
And this is not the placebo effect either. The menu's DO scroll more fluidly after I have killed a few apps, regardless of how you describe the RAM management...
Micksta said:
And this is not the placebo effect either. The menu's DO scroll more fluidly after I have killed a few apps, regardless of how you describe the RAM management...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly, you can tell easily if it is one motion or looks like it is "skipping frames". even it is only because it takes the device some cpu cycles to kill other apps, it does make a difference. like i said a rather cosmetic one, since it doesn't really effect the general usage. nevertheless i like to know what is running and what's not, and so far im running good with advanced task manager free.
WOW i didnt expect a massive response for my question but i thank you all for your responses
MercuryStar said:
I would wager that's the placebo effect. It feels faster because you believe it should. If you understand how the OS works you realise that apps you've switched away from do nothing to slow down or take memory from any other app (see my exception above about apps that launch background services such as music player).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's not true, my phone gets so sluggish sometimes that i can't answer a phone call, the phone doesn't register that i press the answer button. and when that happends i usually have like 20 mb of free ram.
Daniehabazin said:
that's not true, my phone gets so sluggish sometimes that i can't answer a phone call, the phone doesn't register that i press the answer button. and when that happends i usually have like 20 mb of free ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just as a matter of interest, do you use swapper or AppsToSD?
My phone never gets into the situation you've described, but even though I do have the full version of TasKiller, I almost never use it, and I don't see a need at present to use AppsToSD.
In addition, I'd imagine that having a swap partition would cause an issue with Androids own memory management, since I guess it can't distinguish between real and "virtual" memory. So where a "non-swap" device would start killing processes, a "swap" device would just continue on regardless because it thinks it still has physical memory available.
Regards,
Dave
Yesterday I downloaded "Advanced Task Killer Free"... anyone who has experiences with this? Is is better than just "Task Killer" or is it just an updated version of "Task Killer" ?
thanks!
have been using atk free for a while (lol 2 weeks since i got the hero) now, i really like it. its advantage over all other task managers IMHO: it has an ignore list, things you ignore are not shown in the running tasks list. in the list you have check boxes, where you can select the tasks that will be killed, and this list is remembered. for example "htc sense" is on my ignore list, but "music" is only checked, so i can uncheck it when i don't want to kill it while listening to music. next time i want to kill music i just have to tap the checkbox, no dealing with the ignore list here...
Daniehabazin said:
that's not true, my phone gets so sluggish sometimes that i can't answer a phone call, the phone doesn't register that i press the answer button. and when that happends i usually have like 20 mb of free ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get this problem a lot, and in answer to fox meister, I don't have AppsToSD.
I don't know if the problem is RAM or CPU related, but the CPU often jumps to 100% when things are really slow.
Is the issue likely to be background apps, or widgets even?
Sausageman said:
I get this problem a lot, and in answer to fox meister, I don't have AppsToSD.
I don't know if the problem is RAM or CPU related, but the CPU often jumps to 100% when things are really slow.
Is the issue likely to be background apps, or widgets even?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same for me with the processor.
When i reboot my phone i usually have 90 mb of free ram, after starting a few applications, like browser and phonebook, it plummets down to 20 mb.
I do have some extra applications that starts as services, like systray monitor and 3g watchdog.
when i open atk after a fresh reboot i see that some applications that i don't even use is started, like footprints, settings and calendar, even my webrowser is started, whats up with that, can it be disabled?
I think the issue is that we have some applications that autostart withous us using them, and also programs that we download that autostarts as services and maybe having memory leaks...
I came to chime in with my experiences of the CDMA hero and sluggishness.
I watch memory like a hawk (thanks Mogul) and I too have around 80-90mb free ram on start, but it can get down to around 30 rather quickly. Once it gets down here, I notice that screen transitions and random lag occurs in apps. If I go into Advanced Task Killer and kill many of the stragglers, my menus are as smooth as can be.
It is most certainly NOT a placebo effect.
One thing I really like about Advanced Task Killer (pay version) is that it has the "Auto End" feature, where it will kill all apps not chosen to be excluded at the interval that you choose. For example, I have determined the system applications that need to be on all the time, and I've excluded those. Every hour, ATK kills everything else. For the most part, my Hero hovers around 70MB now at all times, although it can get down there to around 30-40MB if I'm right around the 1 hour mark.
That feature alone makes it much better than Taskiller IMO. Totally worth 99 cents
This definition would imply that android works exactly like the iphone osx? I mean saving "screenshots" of the last state of an app. But NOT having real multitasking?
Because it's not possible to have multitasking and at the same time "inactive" background apps everytime you hit the home button...
MercuryStar said:
I'll attempt to sum it up once and for all, to try and set the record straight.
In Android's virtual machine, there is no functional differentiation between "closing" an app and "switching away from" an app. They are the same (the exception is things like music players which need to keep playing after you switch away from them, but even then only the 'service' part needs to keep running).
Whenever you switch away from an app, its current state is remembered so that even if it is effectively "killed" it can be returned to in just that state next time it's opened. Then Android either kills the process or it keeps it open, killing it when it needs the memory. You won't notice any difference between either scenario, except maybe that an app loads a little bit faster if it was kept in memory. At any rate, "closed" apps do not "run", and they do not take RAM or CPU cycles from other apps.
In terms of process/memory management, Android's VM has more in common with a web browser than a desktop OS - sure it can remember your state when you switch apps (like switching tabs, going back/forward/home in a browser) but whether behind the scenes it loads it all into and out of memory when you switch back and forth, or it all stays in memory is irrelevant to the user. Nobody worries that a long forum page on another tab or in their back button history is occupying 80 megs in the background or not, the browser takes care of loading/unloading it from RAM as needed, and that's just like how Android's VM works when switching between various pages of various apps.
Once you understand this you understand that all these 'task killer' apps are really unnecessary - all they'll do is make it slower to restart an app once closed. They don't reclaim RAM that was previously unavailable to other apps.
To cut a long story short, pressing "home" is a great way to close an app, whether you want to return to it later or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shahpur.Azizpour said:
This definition would imply that android works exactly like the iphone osx? I mean saving "screenshots" of the last state of an app. But NOT having real multitasking?
Because it's not possible to have multitasking and at the same time "inactive" background apps everytime you hit the home button...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you've not understood the explanation.
The iPhone will always* terminate an application that isn't on its list of "approved" multi-tasking apps once it isn't active any more (i.e. you've switched tasks).
Android will try to keep whatever it can in memory, but eventually will start killing processes in order to keep the system running.
So, if you're on an iPhone listening to something on Spotify and you want to browse something on the web, the iPhone will "kill" Spotify when you switch to the web browser. On Android this won't occur except in the most critical of resource low situations, but then again, I'd imagine other apps would get killed before Spotify.
Read this article, specifically the section from "Component Lifecycles" onwards specifically "Activity Lifecycle", "Saving activity state" and "Processes and lifecycles".
Regards,
Dave
* Unless it has been jailbroken!
I have kinda nooby question... i am using a phone with stock gingerbread and i am using an advanced task killer. I know a lot of people say that I shouldn't do it, but it just makes my phone a lot faster and smoother. As a noob, i have one question: is task killer really harmful to my phone and is it better for me to not use it? If you say yes, please provide me some specific reason why. Thank you ask much guys!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
its not that bad... but u should not kill background services!
keep settings on safe... don't use aggressive mode
applications u know u use often for example- browser or music player... u can add to excluded section... currently im using ZDBox and it works perfect... it also has additional features that you will need... hope this helps
I only use the ATK to kill an app that's not responding well.
For example, when I was using CM7, sometimes my Google Reader app would hang and display a loading symbol for a long time instead of displaying my articles, and the arrow that shows transmission over the network wasn't displaying so I knew it wasn't waiting on data, I would use ATK to kill ONLY Google Reader. Then I could go back into the app and it would load very quickly.
But since I switched to an ICS ROM, I haven't had that same issue and haven't had a need for ATK.
Also, do note that it does take processing power, and therefore battery power, when your phone decides to restart any of those apps you are killing, and it will restart apps.
For a great explanatory article, see here:
http://androidandme.com/2011/11/app...lers-still-dont-give-you-better-battery-life/
and also the links in the phrase "(see here, and here, and here)".
So in short, they are not exactly "harmful" but they don't provide any real benefit if you "kill everything, every time."
It is a common myth that more RAM = better performance, and this is a result of the market being dominated by Microsoft for so long. Android does not equal a desktop OS. Free RAM literally does nothing. In fact, it is wasteful to have bunch of free RAM. Android manages RAM very effectively and aggressively works to ensure that you have sufficient resources to do whatever it is you want to do. If you notice an increase in performance with a task killer, it is because you have a misbehaving app. Watchdog is the only task manager I would recommend, all it does is watch for apps that are using an abnormal amount of resources and alerts you. Part of the Android experience is the emulated multi-tasking, or having several apps saved to memory simultaneously to facilitate ease of switching between them. An app in the background will not affect the performance of your device, it is not using any resources. Aside from that, if you end a task, it will usually just start right up again, using more resources, because that is how Android is designed to work.
So, I would say finding the misbehaving app is a much better option than a task killer. They were important in eclair, maybe even FroYo. But anything above that they are unnecessary.
i dont really believe in android"s app managmentbut task killers make it only worst IMHO
I have to agree with member devator22.
Android is not Windows. Android is basically Linux and Linux is using a different memory management than Windows does. (Although Windows has got a lot of improvements during the last years)
RAM which isn't used, is wasted! That's a fact.
So, if you run a specific application, some of its data my be cached. Linux is reporting this as "buffered" (you can see the amount by running the 'top' command)
There might be a more or less big chance to hit this cache. If so, the data is loaded much faster ( definetly > 10 ) than if it had to be requested from the file system.
By killing your application by a task manger you are releasing this buffered resources (actually you are forcing the OS to release it). In the worst case you are wasting your advantage of loading already cached data from the RAM. In the best case you are gaining nothing because your device has to load it from the file system anyway.
(sorry for my english )
Get watchdog!
/end
*just because nobody understands you, doesn't make you an artist..
Thank you so much for these replies! I really appreciate it! I decided to keep my task killer but not use it aggressively. I probably will use it to end apps that i really find it pointless. And also to the people who said android dies it's own task managing, you're right but wrong at the same time. When i didn't use my task killer, android did killed some apps in in order to launch more apps, but it left only like 10mb of 300mb, which i found little odd and also it mainly killed launchers which was very annoying.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Task killer will speed up your phone if you know what you're doing. Only kill tasks that you are familiar with...e.g. apps that you know you have launched and won't be using anymore. Those apps running in the background can slow down your device.
If I'm on ICS, its better to use the bult-in task killer, or download one from the market?
Guys, he's not saying he does it for the memory. He says the phone's smoother. I don't know whether this is true, but if there are background tasks performing operations that he doesn't want them to do, it's *absolutely appropriate* to kill them.
The flip side of that is that the applications will eventually be automatically started again, and that startup takes extra CPU time. As long as the process startup and process killing happens when the screen is off, I would think this could improve the responsiveness.
But I think on most people's phones, the background processes really don't use a lot of CPU...
I know by default even Gbs memory management isn't the best. The app priorities are a bit weird aand the launcher gets killed to easily. Running the v6 supercharger scripts and making the launcher hard to kill and fixing the priorities and changing the oom settings makes any from wicked fast
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
I am not rooted, so I can't do anything that involves rooting.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Instead of killing an app over and over again install something like Gemini App Manager and disable the app's autostart permissions. For example, dropbox and dropbox sync are set to automatically start at boot or when there's a connectivity change. I understand why they're set to do that but for my purposes I only needed them to start when I actually used them.
Having said that, I no longer use Gemini and have never used an automatic task killer. I think android (ICS) does a good enough job managing it's memory that I don't need to be anal about micromanaging it myself. I think it also helps that I'm not an appaholic. I'm very picky about what I install and will only keep an app installed if I regularly use it.
Please use the Q&A Forum for questions &
Read the Forum Rules Ref Posting
Moving to Q&A
Jinx Lumos Joke said:
If I'm on ICS, its better to use the bult-in task killer, or download one from the market?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Built-In is much better
im on ics on my captivate and it runs beyond smooth
like stated before having free RAM with not do anything
android has a good way of muti tasking
How can I do this? I noticed yesterday that my scramble with friends app with only 2 games, was taking up 135Mb RAM. I'm sure there's another issue behind there, but this got me noticing other apps that don't need to always be open and running, but for some reason are. How can I stop these apps from auto launching and running in the background?
cgibsong002 said:
How can I do this? I noticed yesterday that my scramble with friends app with only 2 games, was taking up 135Mb RAM. I'm sure there's another issue behind there, but this got me noticing other apps that don't need to always be open and running, but for some reason are. How can I stop these apps from auto launching and running in the background?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because something is loaded doesnt mean its actually running. Android takes programs that are often used and load them into RAM so that they are ready and waiting when you want to run them. They are then dropped out of memory when that memory is needed for something else. Read up on memory management to get a better idea. If you want to kill it anyways, you can probably just use Titanium to freeze it, but this requires root.
Thanks for the response. I'm rooted and also running RAM manager. It seems that certain programs are taking up my RAM that don't need to be. Another example, words with friends, was in my RAM usage after reboot, and I've never even used this game before. Games like scramble with friends I'd imagine always need to be running or in active RAM since that game has notifications and built in messaging. But I don't need to constantly have that app checking for new data. I tried setting the in app settings to check every few hours rather than 5 minutes, but it was still shown as taking 130MB of RAM usage (though the number is normal now after reboot).
So, it sounds like there is no way.. or what you're saying is more of, no need? I just don't want a bunch of little used apps taking up my active memory.
cgibsong002 said:
Thanks for the response. I'm rooted and also running RAM manager. It seems that certain programs are taking up my RAM that don't need to be. Another example, words with friends, was in my RAM usage after reboot, and I've never even used this game before. Games like scramble with friends I'd imagine always need to be running or in active RAM since that game has notifications and built in messaging. But I don't need to constantly have that app checking for new data. I tried setting the in app settings to check every few hours rather than 5 minutes, but it was still shown as taking 130MB of RAM usage (though the number is normal now after reboot).
So, it sounds like there is no way.. or what you're saying is more of, no need? I just don't want a bunch of little used apps taking up my active memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No real need. Android sees that you use this app a good bit so it preloads it, and it's sitting there in unused RAM untill it's either called upon to run or untill another process needs that RAM that its using.The application is not running and that RAM would otherwise be sitting unused, so there's no need to get rid of it unless it happened to be a suspicious application. This process is what gets alot of folks all wound up about never having enough RAM because they think that almost all of their RAM is being used for running processes when in reality this isn't really true, kinda half true.
Download Autostarts from the Market, it will let you prevent apps from starting automatically.
And what Chief Geek said is true, he's missing a big part of the picture, and I see statements like his all the time. Yes Android does a good job of loading things in and out of memory as needed. However, if there is crap you don't care about coming in and out of memory all the time, then that means Android is going to dump stuff out of memory that you DO care about (browser, games, etc.) So if you have a bunch of extra crap running, that means if you pause a game, check and email, and come back, Android may have released it from memory and you have to wait for it to reload. If you cut back on the things that are constantly running, it will keep more of your apps that you care about in memory longer, meaning when you go back to that game they will be there right away.
The more stuff you can prevent from running the better. I use Titanium Backup to freeze stuff I will never use. I use autostarts to prevent certain apps from running at startup that I don't want to - Maps, Facebook, etc. Doing this gives me tons of extra free RAM which translates to more useful multitasking.
EvoXOhio said:
And what Chief Geek said is true, he's missing a big part of the picture, and I see statements like his all the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand where your coming from, as this is a very common argument, but what you didn't mention is your method favors empty/available RAM for multitasking while sacrificing fast launches leading to some folks experiencing a laggy system. I completely agree with freezing the junk as the bloat always seems to have pointless priority, but I feel as once these steps are taken that android does a perfectly fine job of managing RAM. Very rarely do I have to wait for applications to reopen as I'm jumping back and forth between them and never have trouble multitasking. I'm not going to be curt and say your theory is wrong, I'll leave it as just another way of running your device as it certainley has it's merits, but I don't agree that it's for the average user who is more likey to be jumping from one app to another and not back and forth between the same ones needing all the data to be exactly where they left it.
Chief Geek said:
I understand where your coming from, as this is a very common argument, but what you didn't mention is your method favors empty/available RAM for multitasking while sacrificing fast launches leading to some folks experiencing a laggy system. I completely agree with freezing the junk as the bloat always seems to have pointless priority, but I feel as once these steps are taken that android does a perfectly fine job of managing RAM. Very rarely do I have to wait for applications to reopen as I'm jumping back and forth between them and never have trouble multitasking. I'm not going to be curt and say your theory is wrong, I'll leave it as just another way of running your device as it certainley has it's merits, but I don't agree that it's for the average user who is more likey to be jumping from one app to another and not back and forth between the same ones needing all the data to be exactly where they left it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're misunderstanding what I am saying. I am suggesting to prevent apps you don't care about from getting loaded into memory automatically at startup. By doing that, it means more free memory for the system, which means better multitasking.
My method doesn't sacrifice fast launches at all. If anything, by having more free memory, it means more applications will remain in memory, which equals better multitasking and faster relaunches. Initial launches will be the same either way.
I am NOT suggesting to prevent apps you care about from autostarting - just the crap that you never use nor care about. Maybe that's where you misunderstood me.
EvoXOhio said:
You're misunderstanding what I am saying. I am suggesting to prevent apps you don't care about from getting loaded into memory automatically at startup. By doing that, it means more free memory for the system, which means better multitasking.
My method doesn't sacrifice fast launches at all. If anything, by having more free memory, it means more applications will remain in memory, which equals better multitasking and faster relaunches. Initial launches will be the same either way.
I am NOT suggesting to prevent apps you care about from autostarting - just the crap that you never use nor care about. Maybe that's where you misunderstood me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appologize for the misunderstanding, I assumed that since we were discussing an app that he says he does use that you meant to prevent apps such as this all together. Such is an argument that some make in an attempt to maximize the amount of available unused RAM.
Chief Geek said:
I appologize for the misunderstanding, I assumed that since we were discussing an app that he says he does use that you meant to prevent apps such as this all together. Such is an argument that some make in an attempt to maximize the amount of available unused RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was addressing what he said here:
but this got me noticing other apps that don't need to always be open and running, but for some reason are. How can I stop these apps from auto launching and running in the background?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But in all honesty, if his app is using 135MB of RAM when doing nothing, it is probably better off being prevented from running in the background entirely. 135MB is less than 1/3 of the free RAM on the system after a fresh boot.
I been using system tuner pro. You can freezes apps stop them from start up. It also has a task manager that you can choose which apps run what you want to kill.you can also exclude apps so if you kill all it will keep the apps you need running like widget locker bln or avast and kill the rest. Also gives you in depth everything on yor phone
Sent from my oversized communication device.
+1 for Autostarts
Sent magically through the air from the mighty Note!
kimocal said:
+1 for Autostarts
Sent magically through the air from the mighty Note!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2 for Autostarts.
The best by far is Gemini app manager... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.seasmind.android.gmappmgr
long press on the icon of the app to get a menu with an option to disable start up.
And the nice part it has very granular selection of start up permissions.
I understand that apps reserve a certain amount of ram so they can open faster. Everywhere I look it says this is a good thing. If my phone starts to lag, I check active apps. Usually slim to none. Then I clear ram, and 30 Apps close. All of a sudden, phone lightning fast. Then apps reload and phone boggs down again. Since there are no active apps I. Assuming a task killer won't help. I know the more apps I DL the worse my problem will be but I figure the point of having a smartphone is to have toys to play with on it. How can I get my phone to always run just as fast as it does right after I clear the ram? Running blackstar X if it matters.
twinlakesnake said:
I understand that apps reserve a certain amount of ram so they can open faster. Everywhere I look it says this is a good thing. If my phone starts to lag, I check active apps. Usually slim to none. Then I clear ram, and 30 Apps close. All of a sudden, phone lightning fast. Then apps reload and phone boggs down again. Since there are no active apps I. Assuming a task killer won't help. I know the more apps I DL the worse my problem will be but I figure the point of having a smartphone is to have toys to play with on it. How can I get my phone to always run just as fast as it does right after I clear the ram? Running blackstar X if it matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RAM does not take speed, CPU time does. If the apps are sitting in ram, and they are not running then those apps are not taking up any speed. (at least none that you should be able to perceive)
Check other things, remember everything resets when you reboot, so maybe a widget, or the os is running sloppy and causing your slow downs, live wallpaper takes processor cycles also.
Only widget is clockr. No live wallpapers. The time I most notice is bringing up webpages. Go to task manager, ram tab, clear memory and bam no more waiting on a webpage to load. I know I'm not just making it up but everything I research tells me I am.
I understand the whole approach Android uses to memory management as opposed to Windows etc....
I also found this blurb below
It's important to note that Greenify is not a task killer (which you shouldn't use anyway), and it doesn't "freeze" apps. The apps that Greenify hibernates are still usable if you want to switch to them, and you can still pass data to them as though they were running. When you switch back to them, it's like you never left. Greenify just keeps those apps from launching new background processes (a problem with task killers) and you don't have to unfreeze or thaw an app to use it when you want to (a problem with "frozen apps").
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But here is what I don't understand:
1) Even though it isn't a Task Killer per-say, it sure sounds like an advanced task killer to me. If it is preventing something from starting up, it is killing it.
2) What benefit is Greenify supposed to have? Having all (by all I mean maybe 5 at most) desired apps hibernating, I have 700MB of free memory (using xposed method). If I remove Greenify I have 1.5GB of free RAM. These numbers are with ALL applications already open since boot that I use on a daily basis.
While full memory is not a bad thing in Android, how can it be better having 1 app hog all of the memory vs having 5 apps running in the background using less memory. Can someone shed some further light on this?
mikemikemikexxx said:
While full memory is not a bad thing in Android, how can it be better having 1 app hog all of the memory vs having 5 apps running in the background using less memory. Can someone shed some further light on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I understand you correctly you're saying that greenify uses a lot of ram? Greenify for me is idling at 5-7 mb of ram all for time.
cAase said:
If I understand you correctly you're saying that greenify uses a lot of ram? Greenify for me is idling at 5-7 mb of ram all for time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, it was literally using around 700Mb. I rebooted to make sure it wasn't a fluke. I removed Greenify, rebooted again and had 1.5Gb free Ram
mikemikemikexxx said:
Correct, it was literally using around 700Mb. I rebooted to make sure it wasn't a fluke. I removed Greenify, rebooted again and had 1.5Gb free Ram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds completely weird.
the main benefit of greenify is the point that it prevents apps from starting (they are frozen untill you open them) this way the apps can't force wakelocks and your device kann stay in deepsleep state longer
mikemikemikexxx said:
Correct, it was literally using around 700Mb. I rebooted to make sure it wasn't a fluke. I removed Greenify, rebooted again and had 1.5Gb free Ram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I understand, greenify to me is more to battery saver depends on stopping unwanted and unneeded wakelock when app is Greenified. Also as I understand, when an apps launch or relaunched, it will consume more ram in normal way (without being Greenified).
Try this, its not a solution, more to suggestion. Try use Wake Lock Detector along with Greenify, one app will detect the problem and another will execute an action to prevent "unwanted battery and RAM usage".
Above all, it depends on how and what method of modding you perform on your device.
Its just my logic thought(not black n white proven). Hope it will help us a little.
i8190n SlimKat9.0(Android-Andi)
But all the settings. It won't let me hibernate the apps before I've completed 10 - 15 settings and there are no explanations to what the settings are. Greentify is totally useless if you're not a techie.
RolfyBerg said:
But all the settings. It won't let me hibernate the apps before I've completed 10 - 15 settings and there are no explanations to what the settings are. Greentify is totally useless if you're not a techie.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well - not my experience; defaults work well on most devices. There are brief in-app explainations for many options with expanded material in FAQs, XDA forum and G+ pages. Best consider an iDevice if you need/want handholding; genius bars everywhere.