After experiencing a boot loop with an old CM nightly, I flashed the 2/26 nightly. As some of you know, this had a problem with auto-rotate. After flashing the 3/1 nightly. the auto rotate is fixed, but one issue i've noticed with the camera is there's no option for a widescreen image. I just have options for 8MP photos, 3MP photos & VGA.
Any ideas?
There's a new nightly every single day man. Chances are whatever issue you have could be fixed within the next one. These are bleeding edge. You're gonna have bugs.
Phalanx7621 said:
There's a new nightly every single day man. Chances are whatever issue you have could be fixed within the next one. These are bleeding edge. You're gonna have bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does anyone else have an intelligent response to the OP?
I'm using the CM 10.1 M3 build on my SGS3, but while I'm really pleased overall with this version of the ROM, the camera software is a downgrade from the original Samsung ROM and the omission of any widescreen modes is an epic fail in my eyes.
Anyone know if it's possible to change only the camera software without changing the entire rom, and if so any recommended mods?
canadawest said:
Does anyone else have an intelligent response to the OP?
I'm using the CM 10.1 M3 build on my SGS3, but while I'm really pleased overall with this version of the ROM, the camera software is a downgrade from the original Samsung ROM and the omission of any widescreen modes is an epic fail in my eyes.
Anyone know if it's possible to change only the camera software without changing the entire rom, and if so any recommended mods?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Mr. Epic Fail, Phalanx's response was correct. Try posting in the SGS3 forum, since that is what you stated you are using. Calling someone's response unintelligent makes you look like a troll.
nycmalu said:
Hey Mr. Epic Fail, Phalanx's response was correct. Try posting in the SGS3 forum, since that is what you stated you are using. Calling someone's response unintelligent makes you look like a troll.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing as the ROMs for SG S2 & S3 are nearly identical, it shouldn't matter. But thanks for your useless contribution.
Still looking for an actual helpful response if anyone has one.
canadawest said:
Seeing as the ROMs for SG S2 & S3 are nearly identical, it shouldn't matter. But thanks for your useless contribution.
Still looking for an actual helpful response if anyone has one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your sense of entitlement is disgusting. They are completely different devices and we do not have that device so we can't help you.
Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
Nick281051 said:
Your sense of entitlement is disgusting. They are completely different devices and we do not have that device so we can't help you.
Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not about entitlement, it's about hoping for an intelligent response with hopefully an answer or suggestion to the OP question.
The fact remains the OP question was about a ROM feature, and as CM 10.1 features are nearly, if not identical across different hardware, it shouldn't matter that I have a newer model Galaxy. The fact you do not have the same device in this case is irrelevant as the OP's question is ROM feature NOT hardware dependent.
I found this thread using the search and found it had the exact same question I had, on the exact same ROM, so I was looking for any helpful contributions here as well as the GS3 and CM 10.1 specific forums.
Your sense of entitlement and elitism to not wanting/allowing non-GS2 owners post in this forum is what's disgusting.
canadawest said:
It's not about entitlement, it's about hoping for an intelligent response with hopefully an answer or suggestion to the OP question.
The fact remains the OP question was about a ROM feature, and as CM 10.1 features are nearly, if not identical across different hardware, it shouldn't matter that I have a newer model Galaxy. The fact you do not have the same device in this case is irrelevant as the OP's question is ROM feature NOT hardware dependent.
I found this thread using the search and found it had the exact same question I had, on the exact same ROM, so I was looking for any helpful contributions here as well as the GS3 and CM 10.1 specific forums.
Your sense of entitlement and elitism to not wanting/allowing non-GS2 owners post in this forum is what's disgusting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We allow anyone to post, but it doesn't make sense to ask a question when you have an entirely different device. Different devices have different features working/broken.
Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
Nick281051 said:
We allow anyone to post, but it doesn't make sense to ask a question when you have an entirely different device. Different devices have different features working/broken.
Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I agree that different devices can and often do introduce different results with a similar ROM, I completely disagree that it's offside for me to be curious of a possible solution, which is then at MY discretion whether or not I wish to follow that solution on my hardware.
Again, the OP has a question about a ROM (software!) specific feature, of which I have the same question, just on newer hardware (but same ROM)
** My apologies to the OP for taking your thread off topic **
canadawest said:
While I agree that different devices can and often do introduce different results with a similar ROM, I completely disagree that it's offside for me to be curious of a possible solution, which is then at MY discretion whether or not I wish to follow that solution on my hardware.
Again, the OP has a question about a ROM (software!) specific feature, of which I have the same question, just on newer hardware (but same ROM)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is though, it is a different rom since it is a different device.
Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
Nick281051 said:
The thing is though, it is a different rom since it is a different device.
Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, I concede. You win. CM10.1 on GS2 is completely different than CM10.1 on GS3, especially the 4.2.2 camera app, and I had no business thinking that a solution to the OP's question would be helpful to me because I have totally different hardware.
I'm an idiot. Thank you for your 3-4 completely useless contributions to the OP, but at least you were able to successfully police this thread and set me straight! Whew!
Related
RootzWiki has broken news that they have a leaked official 4.0 for the ATT SGSII Skyrocket.
Interesting fact: build date is March 14.
Good news for us... I can only hope so. Just wanted to share this little tidbit with the SGSII world.
Article Link
yeah I seen that earlyer I wonder how much it will help us though...
sent from interspace on my hacked telly...
Doesn't help us, another useless thread is useless
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Nick281051 said:
Doesn't help us, another useless thread is useless
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. It Is of no use to us.
.
The skyrocket isn't anything like our I777. This doesn't help at all.
Nick281051 said:
Doesn't help us, another useless thread is useless
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Useless comment is useless.
Where did I say it would help?
Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS relm. Just a bit of interesting news, welcome to the GENERAL forum.
Don't hate just to hate.
just how I said a months ago, Skyrocket and Vivid are getting ICS before the i777, the source release helped but still not a fully functional.
eortizr said:
just how I said a months ago, Skyrocket and Vivid are getting ICS before the i777, the source release helped but still not a fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
everyone should have known the the ****rocket would get it before us. its an LTE device.
TheMistyMay said:
Useless comment is useless.
Where did I say it would help?
Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS relm. Just a bit of interesting news, welcome to the GENERAL forum.
Don't hate just to hate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody hates you, they and I just hate useless thread.
If the article said something about the ATT i777, then it is a good news, however, it's all about the i727. Absolutely have nothing to do with this forum.
"Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS realm"
Yes, we all know that.
votinh said:
"Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS realm"
Yes, we all know that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perfect! Relevance achieved, uselessness eradicated.
TheMistyMay said:
Useless comment is useless.
Where did I say it would help?
Give a bit of insight into Samsung development progress of current gen phones in then ICS relm. Just a bit of interesting news, welcome to the GENERAL forum.
Don't hate just to hate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not hating, but if you knew it wouldn't help why post it since its for a completely different device
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
In other news: redundancy is redundant.
task650 said:
The skyrocket isn't anything like our I777. This doesn't help at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we're already aware the ****rocket got an ICS leak that was useless to us. Thus this thread is useless because it's redundant - the OP is yet another person who broke the XDA rules and posted without searching. The ****rocket ICS leak has already been discussed numerous times in other threads, it is NOT news and does NOT justify creating yet another new thread so that you can get "omg I have my own thread on XDA!!!" cred.
We're about a week out of kernel sources, and we already have ICS in a better state than that leak. The only things that remain are polishing and NFC, and the polishing part would be required even if we'd gotten official ICS at the same time as the I9100 - it simply takes time to do a proper kernel on a new source base for a completely new Android base.
NFC may require an official I777 ICS release, or maybe just a bit of hacking to get the M250S/K stuff working on I777. If I can get the M250 stuff working on I777, there's a good chance I can get it working on CM9 at that point too.
Redundant thread is redundant.
Closed thread is closed.
I just went to check whether an update is released (I was bored) and It said "an update is available for your phone, but the servers are busy." What do you guys think this means? There's a thread on this for the skyrocket too...
I think it was ****ed up that Willy Wonka made Charlie think he didn't win the contest.....
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!!!........
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
And Red should be in to break his foot off in your ass shortly.
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
tylerdurdin said:
I think it was ****ed up that Willy Wonka made Charlie think he didn't win the contest.....
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!!!........
Sent from my HD2 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
shadowskorch said:
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's xda... thats 50% of the content.
It's the hidden law that people have to magically know that for the AT&T GS2 forum that you must only post in this thread right here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554561
Just amazing...
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I updated my phone yesterday its lighting fast now and there is this new unicorn wallpaper that is really amazing...
sent on my hacked telly from interspace...
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
yahoowizard said:
It's the hidden law that people have to magically know that for the AT&T GS2 forum that you must only post in this thread right here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554561
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, I didn't know about that 'hidden law'. Sorry everybody
Phalanx7621 said:
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
yahoowizard said:
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh where to start on how wrong you are
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Nick281051 said:
Oh where to start on how wrong you are
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, okay, okay, I've seen that one post about how there's only developers here and whatnot. But yeah, this thread in particular does help developers somewhat, so yeah.
shadowskorch said:
Thanks for the unhelpful and denegrating response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll face a lot of people like that here lol.
yahoowizard said:
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um that's 3 reasons?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
ChefAnt said:
Um that's 3 reasons?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And now would be a bad time to tell you that I'm currently studying math in college >.>
But yeah, I was going to counter his two with my two, then I added one later on as I thought of it. Never bothered to change the initial sentence though
Dude. When ICS hits it hits. And if u can't find anything on Google about ics release dates or possible release dates u aren't searching right. Either way when it does drop u go right ahead and flash that buggy bloated OS. I'll stick with my AOKP.
Edit: I sound like a douche in this post. So no more arguing. Hope we get official ics too sometime soon. But odds are I won't flash it anyway ;-p
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
yahoowizard said:
Haha, okay, okay, I've seen that one post about how there's only developers here and whatnot. But yeah, this thread in particular does help developers somewhat, so yeah.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh you're right about this being a developers forum but you're completely wrong about the assumptions that only "elite" members can post. You're about as wrong as humanly possible. We only yell at people for threads like these because it does NOT help any developer in any way and this question gets asked over and over again all in separate threads which bog down the forums an leave less room for the more legitimate questions/ posts. And once you've been on here a while you usually know when you should post a thread or when you shouldn't. I've created a total of 2 threads and only one of them was a thread asking a question (the other was for a pair of cm7 themes) and I made sure it hadn't been asked before. Understand a little better?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
yahoowizard said:
This thread is useful for two reasons.
1. Samsung hasn't officially released a date yet and there really hasn't been a word on a Google search as to whether or not ICS has been released for the AT&T Galaxy S2.
2. Not everyone prefers the modified versions of the ROM, and though there is bloat on the AT&T versions, not everyone's incredibly satisfied with the custom ROM's (I am personally, but yeah, not everyone's down for the custom ROM's).
3. If the official ICS did come out, it can provide something or another to make the current custom ROM's better, such as the ability to get Google Wallet (or ISIS) working, for example.
I appreciate that this is a forum for developers, but that still doesn't allow us to flame every new thread that comes on here that's not created by one of the elite or something or another >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am with you on how this i777 should behave and tone down but you list 3 reasons that I think useless, or should I say "non-productive", here's why
1. If you google/search and find nothing, you MUST think, I mean automatically think, that it is either NOT NOW or NEVER happen. Just like when you search a word and it isn't in the dictionary, you should automatically know that the word is not exist or not being defined yet.
2. custom ROM is for who love to flash, if ones don't want to flash, why would they come here in first place? Moreover, if AT&T decide to release their OFFICIAL ICS for this i777, the owners would get the update automatically, right? Then why stop here anyway
3. If the official ICS did come out? if so, then search/google in step one already yield some results.
Phalanx7621 said:
threads like this are useless. For two reasons. A) we already have fully functional ics releases. With less bloat than the official ics will have. And b) use Google search. U can check the status of ics for our device yourself. And grab news about possible release dates.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everyone roots/roms. I'm waiting on the official update. From past experiences there are people within the industry on this sitewho have information that isn't yet released to the public.
I'm getting a GS3 and giving my GS2 to my gf. While I prefer the customization options of AOKP it isn't as stable as some of the other ROMS. I want her to have a great experience with a rom that will be stable and not so buggy. I've used SHOstock2 before and found it to be quite stable. But I'd like some opinions of those that have used both SHOstock2 and SuperNexus JB. Is the JB rom very stable or a bit buggier since it's newer? What has been your experience?
Thanks in advance. ^_^
Sent from my Galaxy S II running AOKP Jellybean
AngelsNecropolis said:
I'm getting a GS3 and giving my GS2 to my gf. While I prefer the customization options of AOKP it isn't as stable as some of the other ROMS. I want her to have a great experience with a rom that will be stable and not so buggy. I've used SHOstock2 before and found it to be quite stable. But I'd like some opinions of those that have used both SHOstock2 and SuperNexus JB. Is the JB rom very stable or a bit buggier since it's newer? What has been your experience?
Thanks in advance. ^_^
Sent from my Galaxy S II running AOKP Jellybean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope no vs threads
Sent from Team Pirate! Using Tapatalk 2
Nick281051 said:
Nope no vs threads
Sent from Team Pirate! Using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it against forums rules?
AngelsNecropolis said:
Is it against forums rules?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
Sent from Team Pirate! Using Tapatalk 2
Nick281051 said:
Yes
Sent from Team Pirate! Using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's not. I read the rules. http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
So anyways... I'm still looking for constructive feedback from users that have used both roms.
Thanks.
Jellybean is still under development.. Its gonna have bugs. Id use a Rom that has been around long enough since most the kinks are ironed out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
xamadeix said:
Jellybean is still under development.. Its gonna have bugs. Id use a Rom that has been around long enough since most the kinks are ironed out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the idea I'm leaning towards. Let the JB roms mature some.
AngelsNecropolis said:
No it's not. I read the rules. http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
So anyways... I'm still looking for constructive feedback from users that have used both roms.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually yes it is, because vs threads mean opinions, which everyone's is different. Your idea of stable and somebody else's is different.
Sent from Team Pirate! Using Tapatalk 2
We can kill his now . Angel I'm disappointed, you've been around long enough to know the mods don't like threads like this. PM people if u want their opinions. All these devs work hard to give us free awesomeness, so it kinda pits them against each other when we compare them or try and lift one above another. They're all good. Try em out and see for yourself.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Both SHOstock2 and Task's AOKP ICS are ROCK.
I haven't tried any JB firmware yet but don't expect the "bug-free" stage. Stable? they should be.
I read the rules so I'm within my rights to post a thread like this. If the mods don't like these types of posts they can simply use this opportunity to adjust the forum rules. I have no issues with that. But I've read and double read them and I'm not violating the forum rules. Where does it say keep all opinions to yourself and don't ask or give an opinion to others?
And I'm not trying to sound rude or inconsiderate here I'm just being factual and objective regarding the subject. I very much appreciate the hard work and diligence the developers put into their projects but if rom A is buggier or less stable than rom B its not an issue of "show respect to everyone" if someone else is simply stating their own experiences with that rom. I primarily use AOKP but even on the ICS builds there have been certain apps that cause a hard freeze guaranteed that never did when running SHOstock2. It's simply a statement of fact for me based on my experiences.
Sent from my Galaxy S II running AOKP Jellybean
AngelsNecropolis said:
I read the rules so I'm within my rights to post a thread like this. If the mods don't like these types of posts they can simply use this opportunity to adjust the forum rules. I have no issues with that. But I've read and double read them and I'm not violating the forum rules. Where does it say keep all opinions to yourself and don't ask or give an opinion to others?
And I'm not trying to sound rude or inconsiderate here I'm just being factual and objective regarding the subject. I very much appreciate the hard work and diligence the developers put into their projects but if rom A is buggier or less stable than rom B its not an issue of "show respect to everyone" if someone else is simply stating their own experiences with that rom. I primarily use AOKP but even on the ICS builds there have been certain apps that cause a hard freeze guaranteed that never did when running SHOstock2. It's simply a statement of fact for me based on my experiences.
Sent from my Galaxy S II running AOKP Jellybean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one said you can't post your opinion but vs threads are not allowed, phalanx said it best.
Sent from Team Pirate! Using Tapatalk 2
Its been stated before that no vs thread are allowed
Sent from Team Pirate's Transmitter Thingy
These types of threads ARE allowed... Mods come in and close them because users flame the op generally or are just plain negative... It gets out of control and we have to police it up. If you don't like what the op is asking just don't post simple as that... and if it's NOT allowed REPORT it... We have mods that will take care of the issues (or if you can't control yourself and MUST post apply to become a mod)...
You sir have just undone some work and created more for the mods.
Not my problem. Carry on.
EDIT: These threads have a 99.9% failure rate. They degrade rapidly leading in them needing to be locked. Again, not my problem.
PS - get an I777 and develop us some venom awesomeness.
Clay
Team Pirate
Sent from my Buttery Smooth PINK SGH-i777
All the information u need about any rom u want to flash is found in its thread. And in the Op of each thread it tells u if anything major is busted. Along with screen shots normally. There is no reason u can't look in the threads to see what if anything is wrong with the rom and if its enjoyable to use. U can also PM users that are using the rom to see what problems they may have had. So all the info u need already exists. I could flash a rom and have no problems. Everything fits perfectly. You may flash it and think it sucks. I may have apps that don't require push notifications or maybe I don't use sync options. U might. This will affect battery life. So not only is there never a reason to start a thread like this. But even if u do your experience versus mine will be drastically different based on what we use how we use it and what we install. This topic has been beaten to DEATH. Flash the rom and try it for a day. Switch if u don't like it. Is there anyone here who can tell u what you'll like better than YOU?
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
clay101eve said:
You sir have just undone some work and created more for the mods.
Not my problem. Carry on.
EDIT: These threads have a 99.9% failure rate. They degrade rapidly leading in them needing to be locked. Again, not my problem.
PS - get an I777 and develop us some venom awesomeness.
Clay
Team Pirate
Sent from my Buttery Smooth PINK SGH-i777
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I AM A MOD. Did you read my post above yours?
I don't want this to become a bigger issue than it already has. This thread wouldn't have "degraded" if the unconstructive posts were just left out.
I'm obviously not getting any help with this and anyone that would have wanted to post is scared aware by the previous negative posts. I agree with Venom that if you don't like a post or a topic, and you have nothing constructive to add to the post, you are not obligated to post in it. I'm still new to the forums and I'm only here to try and learn and help others with the knowledge that I acquire through my experiences and through the information that I read here at XDA.
I love getting feedback and constructive criticism because it can help expand my knowledge and I don't flame others or try to deride them for their questions or comments. When trying to help others or when posting on their threads please be mindful that we all began somewhere. At one point we all lacked the knowledge. We gain understanding by asking questions, reading, researching, and trying things out for ourselves.
Thank you and have a good day fine gentlemen. I'm going to pick up my GS3 and void its warranty now. =)
Ive ran supernexus very smooth and stable beside a bug or two. the dev for that rom said he may possibly be releasing a newer build today. So things should be extremely stable.
I forgot what this thread was about halfway through Page one lol I thought I was in xda rules and etiquette. I'd personally give a hand-me-down with the oldest, least likely to "waste my time fixing later" software. You'll be expected to handle whatever happens to it, undoubtedly.
Sent from my broken screen beast machine
Does anyone know if there is a Dev working on CM 10.1 for the note? I know there are some issues with porting between 10 and 10.1 but didn't know if there was someone I might throw money at?
I would delete this if I were you before anyone else sees it. Do a little reading
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
MoJoe277 said:
I would delete this if I were you before anyone else sees it. Do a little reading
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for being unhelpful and not pointing me at that reading you mention. I have been reading what I can find for the last 2 months and thought i would just ask if there was a developer working on it so I could then go do more reading based on that information. I don't normally post questions to things I can easily find. Also this IS the Q+A section... Also Also I asked about CM 10.1 not CM 10 which is what I am currently running.
2 months of reading, and you haven't found any info about CM 10.1? That is odd considering that this subject has been discussed many many times in many threads. CM10.1 is not going to happen anytime soon.
I assure you, this has been asked and answered many times
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Regardless there was no harm n him asking this is q&a if u don't have constructive answers then probly shuda must left him to wonder
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Except for the fact it creates yet another useless thread cluttering xda with a question that could have been answered with a search. I doubt he had looked for 2 months. Just as I doubt that all the dui drivers out three have had just 2 drinks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Bubbajoe40356 said:
Except for the fact it creates yet another useless thread cluttering xda with a question that could have been answered with a search. I doubt he had looked for 2 months. Just as I doubt that all the dui drivers out three have had just 2 drinks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Way to be a db about it. The QA section is full of questions that have been asked multiple times. I wasn't asking when CM10.1 was going to happen, just if a developer has taken it up yet. And show me this magical post that has my answer? I did multiple searches. I have been on the internet since you could only get it on a BBS and have been a systems admin for 10 years. I know how to search for things.
abuthemagician said:
Way to be a db about it. The QA section is full of questions that have been asked multiple times. I wasn't asking when CM10.1 was going to happen, just if a developer has taken it up yet. And show me this magical post that has my answer? I did multiple searches. I have been on the internet since you could only get it on a BBS and have been a systems admin for 10 years. I know how to search for things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then good luck to you sir. Hope you find your answer .. No need to start calling names .. This ain't High School and I'm not getting into a flame war with you.
Have a good weekend.
I'll answer it,
Yes...
Devs are working on it, over at Cyanogenmod.
But no, we dont have it for the galaxy note 1, as we lack the source code to make a bootable build, mainly due to the lack of kernel source.
And until samsung is kind enough to give the code, then no 10.1 roms will exist for us.
I hope this helps, and yes, we all want to see 10.1, but the odds are not in our favor....g
gregsarg said:
I'll answer it,
Yes...
Devs are working on it, over at Cyanogenmod.
But no, we dont have it for the galaxy note 1, as we lack the source code to make a bootable build, mainly due to the lack of kernel source.
And until samsung is kind enough to give the code, then no 10.1 roms will exist for us.
I hope this helps, and yes, we all want to see 10.1, but the odds are not in our favor....g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome thanks! I knew there was an issue with some devices as far are kernel source went. I will just keep waiting then
gregsarg said:
I'll answer it,
Yes...
Devs are working on it, over at Cyanogenmod.
But no, we dont have it for the galaxy note 1, as we lack the source code to make a bootable build, mainly due to the lack of kernel source.
And until samsung is kind enough to give the code, then no 10.1 roms will exist for us.
I hope this helps, and yes, we all want to see 10.1, but the odds are not in our favor....g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't have kernel source for JB 4.1, yet we have CM10. So what makes CM10.1 different?
I've seen a few phones that have CM10.1 that do not have JB 4.2 kernel source - ATT Samsung GS2 and HTC Inspire for starters. When I had an Inspire we had CM9 without ICS kernel source.
from the moderator
This has been addressed over and over...... To answer Yes there are a couple of people who are toying with porting CM10+ to the Note....... But that said, they have priorities in life and my guess this is down the list
............ THREAD CLOSED............
Hey guys, I have had my VZW Note II for a few months now, and I tried to root/unlock it a few weeks back but ran into multiple issues that prevented me from completing the process (specifically the unlocking posed problems, no doubt because of my own mistakes).
My question is, what is the state of G Note II modding right now? I came from the GNex (rooted) and it had a very robust community, but it seems like the difficulty with unlocking this phone might lead to a less vibrant set of options for flashing. Is this phone getting a lot of dev attention or is it not worth the trouble to crack?
This is subjective, I know, but give me your opinions if you dont mind! Thanks in advance!
This isn't really a subjective question. There are two forums that could answer your question. Development and original development. Take a look and see what you think.
I will say if you compare anything to the options on a nexus device you'll be disappointed.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
kintwofan said:
This isn't really a subjective question. There are two forums that could answer your question. Development and original development. Take a look and see what you think.
I will say if you compare anything to the options on a nexus device you'll be disappointed.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been shot down when I post questions in the dev threads, but do you think this is an acceptable post for them? I have no doubt that it will be less robust than Gnex, but I figured it might still be worth doing for cyan or AOKP or whatever. Anyways, thanks for the tip!
Mindstar1 said:
I have been shot down when I post questions in the dev threads, but do you think this is an acceptable post for them? I have no doubt that it will be less robust than Gnex, but I figured it might still be worth doing for cyan or AOKP or whatever. Anyways, thanks for the tip!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DO NOT POST YOUR QUESTION THERE! This is in the right place my point was go to them and look at the different ROMs. If it is good enough for you or the is a ROM you want to try then you answered your own question
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
There is no good answer to this. What is mainstream for one person is early-adopter for another. The right answer is to do some reading in the ROM/kernel threads and decide your own comfort level. That you asked this question makes me think you should wait. I would say that dev for this device is still gaining traction. It's only been out a couple of months.
Note 2 - Nexus 7 - Charge - Player 5.0 - Fascinate
<><><><><><><><><><>
Read twice, flash once
There are half a dozen or so Touchwiz based ROMs and at least that many AOSP ROMs. Add in 4 or 5 kernels and considering the we only got the bootloader unlock about two months ago, I think development has been great. In all honestly, I am not sure how many more ways ROMs can be tweaked...there might be some diminishing utility after 10+ ROMs.
I got my phone about 10 days ago, and had it rooted/unlocked within a few hours. I didnt have any issues at all getting it there. I made sure not to accept the VZW OTA update, and when I saw it was going to force me to update within 5 days, that forced my hand to go ahead and root it.
I just used the following guide: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2024207 to root it, and http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2043636 to unlock it.
If you have accepted the OTA update, your steps change, and you'll use http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2118348 to unlock it instead.
I personally havent messed with AOSP roms. Coming from GNex that was all I ran, and I'm enjoying a slick TouchWiz setup right now. I remember on my Droid Charge, having NO desire to keep TW, but it's a lot better on this phone.
I am a Charge refugee as well...what a difference the Note 2 is. I've run CleanRom and three builds of Beans. Don't think I want to give up some the the Touchwiz features for AOSP...at least until key lime pie comes out.
Ugh I hate these threads.
If you want it to be different stop being a little girl about it and go develop yourself. Nothing is stopping you but yourself.
If you want something that doesn't exist, make it exist or get an insane amount of money and back people to make it exist.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
nosympathy said:
Ugh I hate these threads.
If you want it to be different stop being a little girl about it and go develop yourself. Nothing is stopping you but yourself.
If you want something that doesn't exist, make it exist or get an insane amount of money and back people to make it exist.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you feel better after that childish tantrum of a response? You hate these questions, yet you didn't actually respond to what I asked.
I am not a dev, nor do I want to be. I asked not as someone looking for features that don't exist, but as a user who wants to know how the note II compares to the gnex in terms of xda support.
Either answer the question I asked, or keep your whining to yourself.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Mindstar1 said:
Do you feel better after that childish tantrum of a response? You hate these questions, yet you didn't actually respond to what I asked.
I am not a dev, nor do I want to be. I asked not as someone looking for features that don't exist, but as a user who wants to know how the note II compares to the gnex in terms of xda support.
Either answer the question I asked, or keep your whining to yourself.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did answer your question. If you want more support for this device develop yourself for it. That is all there is too it. If everyone had your attitude we wouldnt have any one developing for this phone.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
nosympathy said:
I did answer your question. If you want more support for this device develop yourself for it. That is all there is too it. If everyone had your attitude we wouldnt have any one developing for this phone.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My attitude? You began your response by saying that you hate questions like mine, which is not the most civil of ways to speak to a stranger.
More importantly, you still missed my question. I asked if it was worth my time to unlock it, I did not complain about a lack of dev support. It was an honest question which you ignored and instead responded in a rude manner. Thanks for nothing, a second time.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
nosympathy said:
I did answer your question. If you want more support for this device develop yourself for it. That is all there is too it. If everyone had your attitude we wouldnt have any one developing for this phone.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure what this guy did to launch you into that insanely now cliche rant. This is Q&A not a dev thread. The OP did not ask for an ETA or request a feature or compare one ROM to another, or ask a question that could have been answered with a search.
Many people admonished the OP, including me, but you are the only who felt the need to rip him a new one. You could have just linked him to the XDA rules instead of going off like you did If the OP needed a refresher.
Maybe Q&A is not the best sub-forum for you if you can't assume good intentions. You have your own threads that you can patrol for slights real and imagined.
Note 2 - Nexus 7 - Charge - Player 5.0 - Fascinate
<><><><><><><><><><>
Read twice, flash once
Mindstar1 said:
My attitude? You began your response by saying that you hate questions like mine, which is not the most civil of ways to speak to a stranger.
More importantly, you still missed my question. I asked if it was worth my time to unlock it, I did not complain about a lack of dev support. It was an honest question which you ignored and instead responded in a rude manner. Thanks for nothing, a second time.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your question was not worded very well to say that since you wanted to compaire it to the gnex. A quick look in the development sections shows what is available. My previous points still stand. Always see these threads at least 2-3 times in the 6 months i own a phone that isnt a nexus.
ezas said:
I'm not sure what this guy did to launch you into that insanely now cliche rant. This is Q&A not a dev thread. The OP did not ask for an ETA or request a feature or compare one ROM to another, or ask a question that could have been answered with a search.
Many people admonished the OP, including me, but you are the only who felt the need to rip him a new one. You could have just linked him to the XDA rules instead of going off like you did If the OP needed a refresher.
Maybe Q&A is not the best sub-forum for you if you can't assume good intentions. You have your own threads that you can patrol for slights real and imagined.
Note 2 - Nexus 7 - Charge - Player 5.0 - Fascinate
<><><><><><><><><><>
Read twice, flash once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Sorry I've been around long enough yo get frustrated by people on this site. I've also been saying the same things for months and linking to the XDA rules doesn't make people care, giving them harsh statements do.
If OP wanted his question answered he could have searched. Plenty of info is available.
My views have become, if you haven't searched and then are asking why or if you should do something, you shouldn't do it at all and shouldn't ask if you should.
Search first then ask questions.
If you want to compare the Gnex to the Note2 development, all you have to do is look in both forums and see how many ROM/athreads are in the dev sections. Weather you unlock or not has nothing to do with it. Do it or don't.
In answer to the original poster, yes it is worth unlocking.
The beans and cleanrom roms alone add enough polish to warrant it.
The ability to take a nandroid is worth it. Everyone backs up their computer..... so why not a tablet
There is a kernel or two? That work with stweaks for cpu/gpu power control. A forum member also put together some nice flash able profiles for it even. If you want to increase battery or performance it's possible.
Depending on where you are at, one of the two available basebands may work better for you. That can't be flashed without a recovery....
Because it came with a locked bootloader of the start, there seemed to be a delay with devs because they first had to figure out how to unlock it to begin development. Now that is unlocked the wheels seem to be moving pretty good.
On a side note, if I recall correctly there may be a way to run international roms on it. You would want to research, I haven't really looked into it. Could be wrong.
purged363506 said:
Depending on where you are at, one of the two available basebands may work better for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The original modem has faster 3g for me, but the new one has better connectivity and speed on 4g. I wish we had combined modems with ie. 3g from one modem and 4g from the other.