Antutu ? - AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717

Just wondering what other's benchmark scores were on Antutu? Do you have your phone OC'ed? Mine was always around 8200 however after trying out a new kernel to fix my call audio issue the benchmark fell to 7800.. Is that a big difference? It seems that all of the devices scoring over 9k are all on 4.1.2, is there really anything to that? Just kind of wanted to get a discussion going since I do not see any other threads about it on the Q&A section.
Edit- Well I just moved my apps back to the sd after doing all of the flashing and now it's back up to 8228!

Good info. Did you run the stability tests also and were they the same at the higher speeds. Also are you using the paid version or free? Thanks
Edit: Mine were only 7377. And I see there is no paid version. Seems I have work to do to speed things up..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

Of course no comparison between users is possible because speeds depend more on the cellular/data traffic at the tower you are connected to than the ROM/modem you are trying to measure.
These measurements can be slightly useful for a user to compare ROMs/modems in the area they typically use their service.
Your difference of 400 is the size of a text message, so no, not significant. But it feels better, I'm sure.

It's checking the speed of the CPU, ram, video and SD card read/ write right? What difference would modem and such have?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

The OP mentioned call audio issues, and benchmarks, so I thought he was measuring network speed. If I assumed incorrectly, please forgive me.

Yeah maybe your right now that I re-read it. And I just loaded the program so really don't know what all it measures..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

I was more or less just wondering if the stats were changed based on what kernel or ROM you may be running or if there was something else that could change the performance. After seeing the sgs4 benchmarks I feel like that phone must be the smoothest thing ever because it is head and shoulders better scores than the note.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app

Sorry for the double post but ranger are you sure it is testing the download/upload? I did not think that was included.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app

Related

Phones and software issues.

So many people uave downloaded the new Nero V4 with the 1.4ghz kernel and have no issues. And some phones have crashed and not worked with that kernel.
Cpu tuners seem to work great at saving battery for other people and seem to killing mine more than without it. Even with same settings.
Do these apps work on some phones because of hardware compatibilities? Please help. These cpu tuners seem to harm my battery rather than save them.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
oni1jz said:
So many people uave downloaded the new Nero V4 with the 1.4ghz kernel and have no issues. And some phones have crashed and not worked with that kernel.
Cpu tuners seem to work great at saving battery for other people and seem to killing mine more than without it. Even with same settings.
Do these apps work on some phones because of hardware compatibilities? Please help. These cpu tuners seem to harm my battery rather than save them.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea it happen to me to is dat app cpu tuner dat slows down da phone cause i had it downloaded and its started moving slow...............
Try set cpu. I'm using it and I love it. I am not overclocked though. I have mine set to 200 mhz low and 1000mhz (1ghz) high conservative. I only overclock when playing games that require the extra speed.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yea i wanna try... just that i dont know if it will be a waste because i tried to many overclock apps and they all fail. I hear both good and bad things about it. I mean good reviews and bad reviews. So i think it might vary phone to phone.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
oni1jz said:
Yea i wanna try... just that i dont know if it will be a waste because i tried to many overclock apps and they all fail. I hear both good and bad things about it. I mean good reviews and bad reviews. So i think it might vary phone to phone.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know a lot of people are going to disagree, but I'm really not buying that "it varies from phone to phone". The only differences I know of is that newer Vibrant's don't have the gps issue and they have the 3 button issue with them where you can not boot into recovery. Other than that I think all Vibrant's are built the same.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

At&t samsung galaxy 2 Benchmarks

AnTuTu Stock cpu speeds
scores - SGII = 5777
HSPDA = 18 Mbps
picture of bench mark
trutulsa.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sg.jpg
At&t samsung galaxy 2 vs Verizon bionic
scores - SGII = 5777 Bionic=4955
Here is a video with benchmark and hsdpa speeds.
youtube.com/watch?v=dRW66yTMcOg
Quadrant
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I constantly see reviewers refer to this phone as the fastest one available, but a number of benchmarks showed it being beaten by the LG Optimus 2x..how does that work? Even better GPU?
Samsung cap there Gpu at 60 frames
mcorrie1121 said:
I constantly see reviewers refer to this phone as the fastest one available, but a number of benchmarks showed it being beaten by the LG Optimus 2x..how does that work? Even better GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
mcorrie1121 said:
I constantly see reviewers refer to this phone as the fastest one available, but a number of benchmarks showed it being beaten by the LG Optimus 2x..how does that work? Even better GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would not to much faith on benchmarks. Sure their cool to see. But in the end, through user interaction, screen scrolls, etc. It's all relative. This phone is a beast, it will still be for another year when it's replaced by the Galaxy S III and it will laugh at the iPhone 5.
My Benchmarks on Stock
Here are my benchmarks using Quadrant on the stock ROM. It should be alot better (if thats possible) on a custom ROM.
That's what I got
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
I get that easily on a stock leaked 2.3.5 AT&T Captivate ROM.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
I don't know if I can believe that, this has better hardware all the way around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
I will post a picture later. When I have my phone, left it at home and I'm at a friends house.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
yoneilio said:
I don't know if I can believe that, this has better hardware all the way around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it's also not 2.3.5 on the SGSII.
b-eock said:
I get that easily on a stock leaked 2.3.5 AT&T Captivate ROM.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but if you used quadrant pro and saw the score broken down you'd understand that it is just artificially inflated. There are multiple tweaks that boost quadrant benchmarks that do nothing noticeable otherwise.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium

Quadrant score low

I used to be getting 3200-3600 on my gs 2 but ever since I flashed unnamed 1.3 and icscrewed 1.1 I've been getting score ranging from 2800-3200
Is this suppose to happen?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
The numbers mean absolutely nothing as far as how the phone runs. If they go up or down doesn't mean anything unless you like showing off your epeen....
Benchmarks don't mean that much (except large differences 1000+). How quick does the phone respond? Does it feel fast? If so great. If not, keep working.
Sent from my páhhōniē
I see.
I'm not a least bit regret about flashing unnamed because my phone is ridiculously fast right now.
I guess quadrant score really doesn't mean anything lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
honghsien5 said:
I used to be getting 3200-3600 on my gs 2 but ever since I flashed unnamed 1.3 and icscrewed 1.1 I've been getting score ranging from 2800-3200
Is this suppose to happen?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? you should be getting around 9,999,999 if you're using quadrant. thats about how accurate that app is. its a worthless piece of junk that you shouldn't use to measure the speed of your device dude. just use your phone and weight it out from real-world user experience.

Speed up Android 90%

I saw this in Reddit today and thought I'd post it to the EVO forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1987032
Yes i saw this on reddit too, have you tried it out yet?
I tried it out, there is actually a speed boost. Although I think my battery suffered a bit.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
nice find! i need to start checking out other threads/sections on xda.. i always just stay in what ever phone i have at the time thread.. there's alot of other cool issh goin on else where :good:
I too saw that on Reddit. I tried it out on my Evo running Stock w/ Goodies, and on my Nexus 7. Installed, rebooted, and played a bit to let things "settle in", and there is definitely a noticeable improvement in speed and responsiveness, on what were already pretty swift and smooth devices.
I haven't tried it yet, but will soon. If this works out in the long run, hopefully the devs can put this in their roms. I wonder if Google knows about this...
Anyone do a quadrant on this yet? I'm curious if it really works or its just a placebo. Also, how is battery life?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Haven't looked much into this but improvements of this nature usually have a decent drawback.... Ie battery life...
interested in some results though if anyone does it
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I'm using it and it seems good
6000 is without 6200 is with
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I've done it. Its hard to tell given this was already fast but I haven't lagged, benchmarks up a few hundred.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Overclocked at 1.8 with it off
Overclocked at 1.8 with it on
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Interesting, probably works similar to linaro. Looking forward to what our dev's say about it...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Directions seem to be hard to come by in that thread... I installed the apk in it, and also flashed a zip file that was referenced in one of the last pages. Doesn't seem to make a bit of difference... As a reference, though, I benchmarked a 6700 on basically stock JellyBean a few weeks back. Still have the screen shot from it saved.
tyler.durden said:
Directions seem to be hard to come by in that thread... I installed the apk in it, and also flashed a zip file that was referenced in one of the last pages. Doesn't seem to make a bit of difference... As a reference, though, I benchmarked a 6700 on basically stock JellyBean a few weeks back. Still have the screen shot from it saved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you need is the .apk, toggle, check & reboot.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Come on guys, running a benchmark to see if it works is a total waste of time. I can run the same benchmark 10 different times and get10 totally different scores without applying any mods at all.
themuffinman said:
Come on guys, running a benchmark to see if it works is a total waste of time. I can run the same benchmark 10 different times and get10 totally different scores without applying any mods at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know someone asked for them so I did them
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
themuffinman said:
Come on guys, running a benchmark to see if it works is a total waste of time. I can run the same benchmark 10 different times and get10 totally different scores without applying any mods at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is better:
Enter this in a terminal to see if its working.
watch -n 1 cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
3000+ & its doing its job. (Per that thread)
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
tried it on my Sony S, doesn't really appear to do anything... then agian I wasn't having lag issues...
Also, this shouldn't affect quadrant... just random lags
Cyanogenmod himself posted in that thread saying that there is something going on, but he doesn't know what exactly it is... However there is a mild speedup according to him. He just doesn't know why
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Art2Fly said:
Cyanogenmod himself posted in that thread saying that there is something going on, but he doesn't know what exactly it is... However there is a mild speedup according to him. He just doesn't know why
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what little I know about entropy pools, the larger this pool (a pool of random actions right?) is & the faster your programs/inputs are able to access it. The more responsive they'll be.
I could be very wrong but this is what I assume is happening here.
This pool that continusly dumps & fills for however many seconds is about 300-400 nomally on our device. With the tweak the pool is 3000+, I think the tweak also increases the speed of the refresh to access the pool by 1 second.
So 1 second (every second this -> 4 digit figure randomly fills & dumps) + 3000+ accessable random numbers (actions) vs. undetermined number of seconds & a pool avg or 300-400.
Again I'm guessing. I haven't spoke of this since my Eee PC & that might've been for a kernal.
I imagine it as a hand/s repeatedly reaching for a few hundered chocolates spinning in a whirlwind (before) & a ton of random chocolates with even faster hands reaching for a few thousand chocolates spinning in the whilrwind (after).

[Q] native score problems

Hey everyone had a question about the jb update. Sense i updated ive ran benchmarks and im getting results for native score the same or less than the gs3. Before on ics it ran much higher than the gs3. Can anyone tell me why this is or if anyone else is having the same results im using cf bench btw. Also my battery percentage is going up and down on its own without charging jumping multiple percentages.
Are benchmarks really a big deal? The phone flies and is perfectly smooth
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Like tdnick said, its just a benchmark. The phone runs much smoother than before so I wouldn't take it too seriously.
I have to say mine is slower in most ways.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
chrisphoenix7 said:
I have to say mine is slower in most ways.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LGNPST back to ICS. :good:
Odd I'm getting very close to the same benches on ICS and the stock JB.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
I may be wrong but I think the default I/O is fiops. Change to deadline for that placebo effect of high benchmark scores. (Or the other way around. I have no idea what fiops is lol.) :3
Sent from my Paranoid Neximus G
responses
I just felt it was running much slower than ics and thats what made me check the benchmarks and they were way down. Im going to factory reset and then reinstall jb. Lol well see how this goes.

Categories

Resources