I ran a few Quadrant benchmarks with my A70H, and I found it to be pretty variable. In Overdrive, I got one just north of 1500, one 1700, and one over 1900.
I thought the HDD version would be slower than the SSD, but it seems a lot of the SSDs are running in the 1500-1700 range. Is this true?
Can't wait for a way to load custom, OC kernels on the HDD!
just my observation: Quadrant run for touchpad only gives score of around 2400... my nook color with 1.3ghz single core gives score of over 2600 all the time!!! i looked into the device info, it seems like it only using 1 core!!! does cm7 only recognizing one core??? what r ur guys thought??? is there a fix for it or any kernels that utilize both cores of touchpad!!!
The Quadrant results on the TP are skewed because the GPU code has not yet been implemented (or optimized) which primarily affects the FPS section (looks like is is only doing about 4 frames per second) where all the other graphics demos (especially the planet one) do 20-60 frames per second which is a 300%-600% improvement over the Nook Color running 1.2GHz.
I would be interested in other benchmarks that are not dependent on the GPU code.
try using Antutu - free from market
it separates the scores according to each test
(also shows total)
i got around 5000 - OC 1.7 ghz
Maybe it is because we are running an un-optimized alpha build...Don't worry about synthetic benchmarks anyway.
Both cores are already being used, what is your processor clocked too?
I'm completely aware benchmarks don't really mean much, but for curiosities sake, out of 3 runs, I averaged 3228 in quadrant. I am overclocked to 1782mhz ondemand.
I suggest you run SunSpider also.
I'm getting differing hardware specifications on those AnTuTu benchmark and CPU-Z. Both latest versions from the Play Store.
Is this right?
AnTuTu
yes,thats good..
My geekbench and even antutu benchmarks are low compared to other people. Me and my friend both got s6 recently. Mine is Indian version n his USA. His geekbench scores are single core - 1495 and multicore 5100.and mine is single core - 1422,multicore - 4536.
I never got beyond this.
Could somebody please explain why the Snapdragon 821 @ 2.4 GHz has TWICE the single-core benchmark score compared to the MediaTek Helio P35 @ 2.3 GHz!?
https://nanoreview.net/en/soc/qualcomm-snapdragon-821
https://nanoreview.net/en/soc/mediatek-helio-p35
I can confirm that Snapdragon 821 devices indeed perform way better when it comes to say, emulation, but the question is... WHY? (considering it's only 0.1 GHz ahead in terms of clock speed)