Hi guys,
the name says it all, just post your benchmark scores here
and please no "Benchmarks mean nothing" posts, we all know that
Oxygen ROM 2.1.0
Got 53k before 2.1. Will update with score on 2.1 in a minute.
EDIT: Okay, so still 53k... Are you putting your phone in the freezer or something?
EDIT2: WTF, Geekbench gave 637 single-core score and 3900 multi-core. Is something wrong with my CPU?
Same here... Do you know why do we have such low score? Im on 2.0 OS btw stock settings no root..
did you switch antutu to 64bit ?
i get results between 56k-62k
phone is still completely stock, ROM &Kernel
i just don´t use for some minutes before doing antutu to let it cool down
Antutu scores seem ok.. but geekbench is around half less than it should be.. :S
single: 697
multi: 2251
cpu usage is around 65%-70% during the benchmark which also seems strange.. :S
ROM: temasek
Kernel: ak kernel (stock)
-> 57K
got 61888 Antutu with 64bit, rooted & stock OS...is that ok?
gesendet von draußen
That's a good score I think?
Reflashed my chinese variant with the 2.1 full rom posted on the oneplus forum and my geekbench score is doubled!! Are there some malware/bloatware preinstalled on the chinese version? Because that could be an explanation why its so slow out of the box...
62k with AK
http://i.imgur.com/CTsZca5.png
http://i.imgur.com/Ci90E9Q.png
Well expected I'd say. Also thinking about buying O+2
Stock oxygen 2.1
Not too shabby.
74C, I win [emoji14]
Sent from my ONE A2001 using Tapatalk
Skickat från min ONE A2003 via Tapatalk
Anyone run a few benches in a row? How hard the throttle kicks in?
Exodus Android, AK 005
Everything bone stock
Sent from my ONE A2003 using XDA Free mobile app
Yesterday when i ran geekbench it gave half the scores.. Now it appears correct.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using XDA Free mobile app
_Kosmas_ said:
Exodus Android, AK 005
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ak 005 + 2.1 oxygenOS
a2001 chinese, how to get 60k plus ?
Related
Anyone done it?
Btw.
Samsung GalaxyS: 6300
HTC Desire: ~5000
HTC DesireHD: 2500 (O'c to 1.5GHz)
Apple iPad2: 2100
SGSII?
Edit: Samsung GalaxyS: 3100 (CM7), 2133 @ 1.44GHz
From PC Pro:
It loaded the full BBC homepage in four seconds dead, completed the SunSpider test in three seconds, and most impressive of all, gained a score of 3,460 points in the Android-specific Quadrant test.
pulser_g2 said:
From PC Pro:
It loaded the full BBC homepage in four seconds dead, completed the SunSpider test in three seconds, and most impressive of all, gained a score of 3,460 points in the Android-specific Quadrant test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess those 3seconds mean 3000ms because test ran for at least 10seconds or more. That is comparable to DHD, but it means sunspider is not threaded and hence irrelevant because browser definately uses both cores.
How could iPad score that well? I guess browser is much optimized.
if you give me a link i'll run it now.
Like this?
nordichardware.se/images/labswedish/artiklar/Smartphones/samsung.galaxy.s.2/fullimages/sunspider.png
Burko said:
if you give me a link i'll run it now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html
DemonoftheMall said:
Like this?
nordichardware.se/images/labswedish/artiklar/Smartphones/samsung.galaxy.s.2/fullimages/sunspider.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm. 3400 is not as fast as I expected...
3167
Burko
Burko said:
3167
Burko
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I expected at least iPad2 scores, but more important is that browser is generally very fast and smooth and it runs flash
2477 here.
baron von bubba said:
2477 here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocked or just governor performance?
running @ 1500mhz. not really played with the govener settings yet, need to find out a little more about the differences between the settings.
1919 here, im beating the Ipad hahahaha, overclocked, dolphin browser/desktopmode. No major tweaks btw
Edit: Jumped to 2100 on the second run, the test seems to differ from time to time.
5678, [email protected]3, JVH, no o'c. GSII here I come
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
2133! SGS1 CM7 @1.44GHz
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
1346 with Opera mobile 10 @ 1660 MHZ with angelom rom
edit: got right now 1289 with same config as above
Hello everyone, I currently have CM7 on my LG Optimus one which has been overclocked to 787mhz, the max available in the kernel that comes with CM7. I get about 800-900 points in quadrant and I would like to know how to make my phone faster. I see some get 1200 or more in quadrant and would like to know what rom's,kernel's, and tweaks they used.
Any help would be great. Thanks
davefootball123 said:
Hello everyone, I currently have CM7 on my LG Optimus one which has been overclocked to 787mhz, the max available in the kernel that comes with CM7. I get about 800-900 points in quadrant and I would like to know how to make my phone faster. I see some get 1200 or more in quadrant and would like to know what rom's,kernel's, and tweaks they used.
Any help would be great. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Quanrant v1.x
Oh are the scores different in 2.0? Also what kernel will let me overclock further and still work with CM7 nightlies for my optimus one?
EDIT: Ran quadrant 1.8 and got a score of 1288, not bad. Can I improve this further though?
;-)
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
davefootball123 said:
Oh are the scores different in 2.0? Also what kernel will let me overclock further and still work with CM7 nightlies for my optimus one?
EDIT: Ran quadrant 1.8 and got a score of 1288, not bad. Can I improve this further though?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ummm I'm not an expert on this but running old version simply increases your score because it's just an older version. In other words your performance is still the same.
Look at 3Dmark 06 vs 3Dmark 11...
Maybe a faster memory card...
Maybe with none apps installed... (ha)
But at the end of the day, it's just a benchmark. (as eeee616 said, use the old version 1.x)
More quadrant scores won't make your phone faster. Don't be concerned about it.
quadrant scores are juz for benchmarking....u need to think about speeding up only if u hav a laggy phone..miks port is pretty fast..so is oxygen rom for new baseband...try a class 4 or higher memory card....
Will franco v4 kernel work with CM7 nightlies rom?
davefootball123 said:
Will franco v4 kernel work with CM7 nightlies rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup im using CM 7 nightlies with franco v4 kernel n its working good....
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Hello,I've noticed that there's another thread for discussion of benchmarks
But mostly everyone has posted scores obtained on stock ROM
I would like to open this thread to discuss about the LOW benchmark scores obtained on cm10.2 on LG G2 d802
People are getting 30k + or even 35k+ on stock on antutu
But here on cm10.2 I've not heard or seen a single one get above 25k+ on antutu
I would like us to discuss why this is happening ?
And all those running cm10.2 on d802 ,please post your benchmarks here
This discussion is about why we are obtaining low benchmark scores and how we can fix this problem on cm10.2 only
Thank you.
I got 28,783 and 28,773 on two different days running default cm kernel. (I previously got 34,146 with LG stock)
I only got way down to 25k when I used wootever's kernel, so I reverted to default cm one. I have to say, I don't have any problems with the speed of the phone though. Even playing Asphalt8 for several hours last night, I don't notice any frame drops at all, so i'm certainly not complaining. But I would like to know, just out of curiosity, why the antutu score drops on cm.
never got 25k. highest was 31k plus, but forgot to do screenshot
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
lch920619x said:
never got 25k. highest was 31k plus, but forgot to do screenshot
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?
Also what kernel ? And cpu covernor ?any UV etc?
varund7726 said:
What ROM are you using?
Also what kernel ? And cpu covernor ?any UV etc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM M1, cm kernel
interactive, no other tweaks.
One thing, though , I noticed is that sometimes newly flashed CM will set max CPU to 1.7 or 1.9 Ghz. That cannot be noticed in daily usage but certainly has an impact on benchmark scores. Try reverting it back to 2.26 see what happens.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
lch920619x said:
CM M1, cm kernel
interactive, no other tweaks.
One thing, though , I noticed is that sometimes newly flashed CM will set max CPU to 1.7 or 1.9 Ghz. That cannot be noticed in daily usage but certainly has an impact on benchmark scores. Try reverting it back to 2.26 see what happens.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah.
And today I put my phone under the air conditioner (LOL) while taking the antutu test and somehow it managed to get to 27k
Using pacman and cm stock kernel
I'm sure they will get better on the scores. On my old S4 it used to have lower scores than stock rom when runnning early cm 10.2 nightIies. The recent one has higher scores than stock.
On regular use though I did not notice any slowdowns so I keep running CM
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app
varund7726 said:
Yeah.
And today I put my phone under the air conditioner (LOL) while taking the antutu test and somehow it managed to get to 27k
Using pacman and cm stock kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get this when I try your aircon trick
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
lch920619x said:
I get this when I try your aircon trick
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hana.awesome!
varund7726 said:
Hana.awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have u tried original CM nightly?
I tried PAC once and found if a tad laggy-er than CM. So I went back to CM.
maybe it also affects your benchmarks?
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
lch920619x said:
Have u tried original CM nightly?
I tried PAC once and found if a tad laggy-er than CM. So I went back to CM.
maybe it also affects your benchmarks?
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try it today
We should have more kernel support for cm.UV might help a lot for benchmarks.
What we need is a kernel with thermal throttling disabled. Wootever has implemented intelli thermal which allows us to control it but it's not working correctly yet.
I wanted to know what is the best score anybody has had on a benchmarking app. My best score on AnTuTu is 146620. It doesn't have to be AnTuTu. It can be any benchmark you want.
AnTuTu: 168194- @Kevinkuensken
Geekbench 4 CPU: 1720/4217 - @rendler
3dmark slingshot es 3.1: 2601 - @kaotikb
Quadrant: 43253 - @rczrider
Tag me if you want to add a benchmark / top score.
I had a 145 but never got the screen shot
Antutu Scores
Just thought I'd throw it out there for us to post some antutu scores.
I haven't done anything with mine and got these scores which are pleasantly surprising.
Closed all apps and redone.
Let's see what you guys got...
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
My first one :
Sent from my ZTE A2017U using XDA-Developers mobile app
Updated op with new benchmarks and method for adding benchmarks.
I retested after I let some settings settle in here are the results:
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
I'm sure after the nougat update it will reach 150.000 just wish someone would start building a custom kernel
Technically I don't think I should be posting my scores here. I have the 128GB model. From what I've read about flash memory: two identical memory modules from the same factory, even same factory line the higher capacity will always perform marginally better.
So I'm thinking that's what is pushing my scores higher than normal.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
I've got the 128gb model as well, but it ain't doing anything spectacular on these scores. It does feel like it performs better than the 64gb i had before... Much snappier and no lag at all. ?
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
rendler said:
Technically I don't think I should be posting my scores here. I have the 128GB model. From what I've read about flash memory: two identical memory modules from the same factory, even same factory line the higher capacity will always perform marginally better.
So I'm thinking that's what is pushing my scores higher than normal.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see why that would affect CPU and GPU scores.
Well what is your score?
awsomjgp said:
I don't see why that would affect CPU and GPU scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AnTuTu one definitely has internal storage I/O tests included in the testing suite. Whereas Geekbench CPU doesn't.
Also doesn't the 128 come with 6gigs ram?
CampfireVibés said:
Well what is your score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this directed to me? My scores are in the pics in op.
rendler said:
The AnTuTu one definitely has internal storage I/O tests included in the testing suite. Whereas Geekbench CPU doesn't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be interesting if the 128 gig model has a different storage controller.
alom5 said:
I've got the 128gb model as well, but it ain't doing anything spectacular on these scores. It does feel like it performs better than the 64gb i had before... Much snappier and no lag at all.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well what is your score then
---------- Post added at 10:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 AM ----------
alom5 said:
I've got the 128gb model as well, but it ain't doing anything spectacular on these scores. It does feel like it performs better than the 64gb i had before... Much snappier and no lag at all.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awsomjgp said:
Is this directed to me? My scores are in the pics in op.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, i forgot to hit the quote button, i meant to ask the guy with the 6gb variant thank you though.
S8ntsHaz3 said:
Also doesn't the 128 come with 6gigs ram?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two different models 128 can come with 4 or 6GB.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Here is my antutu