Battery life and camera - Snapdragon - Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Questions & Answers

How the battery life performance and camera? the camera was good or average?
at now I have LG G2.. Note 3 pro have better camera?
in Low Light the picture is very bad?

Battery life is amazing. Somewhere between 10 and 11 hours of screen time.
The camera is decent as long as the lighting conditions are good, but suffers greatly in low light conditions.
Whether the G2 has a better camera or not I don't know as I never had that device.

I had the G2 prior to this. The G2 is trumped compared to the note 3 pro camera. Trust me man. You just need a good app with manual controls. DSLR controls and it is pretty good. Camera is underrated in reviews but it is awesome!

Really? Note 3 better camera? what about in low light? I want good camera in low light and G2 have bad camera on low light conditions.
Note 3 pro better build quality? Metal vs plastic of G2
I do not know if you should upgrade .. This device is much better?
Why you buy note 3 pro?

raven19723 said:
I had the G2 prior to this. The G2 is trumped compared to the note 3 pro camera. Trust me man. You just need a good app with manual controls. DSLR controls and it is pretty good. Camera is underrated in reviews but it is awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree! But the Miui camera app is really bad!! :S

Naphtha said:
Agree! But the Miui camera app is really bad!! :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what is the best app?

saarxee said:
So what is the best app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try open camera
Inviato dal mio kenzo utilizzando Tapatalk

I have both phones, note 3 pro and lg g2, camera in n3p in low light is terrible, i only use auto mode or night mode with stock apps.

Related

[FIX] Remove the lag and low FPS in the camera...

I think i might have found a fix for the slow FPS and lag in the camera in low light condition.
Try installing the new google camera app, from android 4.4 kitkat, and use your camera at night with both apps, you will see a difference.
But there's a little compatibility issue with the app, it doesnt scale with the phone resolution.
hxxp:// w w w.mediafire.com/?g3i3i9skdh8s6xl
I find the LG's one too over exposed. I think the app is trying to increase the exposure too much in night shot, thus the lag slower fps. What do you guys think??
Good ol' HDB flats! Hola fellow Singaporean!
Yea the Google cam works fine but the resolution is capped at 8mp unfortunately.
Singapore +1 Haha
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Is this just a standard apk or do you need to be rooted?
yea but look how much brighter the LG one is. although the colors seem to be a little off, i don't mind it. especially in low light situations where i want to take a pic and not use flash. i don't mind that its slower because it has to compensate for the low light. and it does low light pics amazingly btw. if it was slow in bright light conditions, then thats an issue. now to work on the focusing and overall blurriness of pics...
I mean, that's not a fix lol its just using another app. every other app works in low light with higher fps, it's just lgs camera that doesn't. this title is misleading.
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
I downloaded and installed and will report back with my findings
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Google's camera is still a little laggy... Plus, I've noticed that the navigation bar is not hiding, I don't know if is just with me.
I also noticed that the G2 is not fast to focus when we are at low light conditions.... Very poor. I wish LG could make this better, because even the front camera is laggy.
ploquets said:
Google's camera is still a little laggy... Plus, I've noticed that the navigation bar is not hiding, I don't know if is just with me.
I also noticed that the G2 is not fast to focus when we are at low light conditions.... Very poor. I wish LG could make this better, because even the front camera is laggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Laggy compared to what? Compared to bright light conditions?
souleman said:
Laggy compared to what? Compared to bright light conditions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to have a SIII.
So, I'm comparing with my SG SIII camera.
With low light.... it is very laggy, even the Google camera apk, it is not as good as I would expect.
I bought this phone because of the quality of the camera; sure it is amazing with bright conditions, but, it is very poor with low lights...
Even the flash is laggy.
I compared mine in low light next to my evo. There was slightly more lag (less then a second more), but the image quality was thousands times better. Could barely make out anything with the evo, other then the fact there were things in the room. With the g2, you could actually see what was in the room. And with the mod's from this site, got a clear picture that looked almost the same as actually being in the room.
The image quality is good. OK, I accepted that. But, in my case, for example, I have a 5 months old child, I Love taking pictures of her. With low light it got so laggy that is really hard to take one without blurring, 'cause she is moving all the time, so, I was expecting a little bit of improvement on the camera's speed.
Enviado de meu LG-D805 usando Tapatalk
ploquets said:
The image quality is good. OK, I accepted that. But, in my case, for example, I have a 5 months old child, I Love taking pictures of her. With low light it got so laggy that is really hard to take one without blurring, 'cause she is moving all the time, so, I was expecting a little bit of improvement on the camera's speed.
Enviado de meu LG-D805 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to set the iso at 800.
OK let's just all spazzzzzzz about meeting Singaporeans on XDA. Heyo fella, happy CNY in advance
Anyway, coming from a Lumia 920 with crazy lowlight shots, I've given up on using the G2 camera in the night time totally. Tried LG-based camera apps on different ROMs and AOSP ones, they all suck. Takes super long to focus and picture turns out blur. OIS is just but a gimmick (or maybe I have extra-shaky hands, idk?).
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app
ploquets said:
I used to have a SIII.
So, I'm comparing with my SG SIII camera.
With low light.... it is very laggy, even the Google camera apk, it is not as good as I would expect.
I bought this phone because of the quality of the camera; sure it is amazing with bright conditions, but, it is very poor with low lights...
Even the flash is laggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recently switched to the G2 from a Nexus 5 and since we are talking about camera I find that the Nexus 5 Front facing camera takes better pix, sharper and more vibrant, the G2 is shadowy and not as sharp am I the only one experiencing this?
Izz14 said:
I recently switched to the G2 from a Nexus 5 and since we are talking about camera I find that the Nexus 5 Front facing camera takes better pix, sharper and more vibrant, the G2 is shadowy and not as sharp am I the only one experiencing this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll be switching from Nexus 5 too. Which do you think has a better camera? I don't really use the front too much but the nexus 5 does good with it though the g2 has 2,3 mp front while Nexus 5 only has 1.3 but apparently these days mega pixels don't mean as much
Sent from my white LG Nexus 5
abdel12345 said:
I'll be switching from Nexus 5 too. Which do you think has a better camera? I don't really use the front too much but the nexus 5 does good with it though the g2 has 2,3 mp front while Nexus 5 only has 1.3 but apparently these days mega pixels don't mean as much
Sent from my white LG Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have both in hand right now and I'm torn I did some adjustements in the G2 so I think it will suffice I dont use the front camera as much also , it just erked me that it sucked in comparison to the G2 if you end up getting one you will see what I'm talking about exactly in regards to the front camera, it's just more vibrant and sharp on the Nexus 5 ( front) the back I think G2 does a tad better but sometimes I feel like it's overexposed
I do like the G2 Display and battery life I hated the Stock UI so I flashed PA 4.4.2 so it's pretty much a carbon copy of what a nexus 5 would look like, flashed G2 on 4.4.2 is a better battery/display Nexus 5, factoring in the fact that it costs more than the Nexus 5 , Nexus 5 comes out a solid solid phone I'm really confused ........
Izz14 said:
I have both in hand right now and I'm torn I did some adjustements in the G2 so I think it will suffice I dont use the front camera as much also , it just erked me that it sucked in comparison to the G2 if you end up getting one you will see what I'm talking about exactly in regards to the front camera, it's just more vibrant and sharp on the Nexus 5 ( front) the back I think G2 does a tad better but sometimes I feel like it's overexposed
I do like the G2 Display and battery life I hated the Stock UI so I flashed PA 4.4.2 so it's pretty much a carbon copy of what a nexus 5 would look like, flashed G2 on 4.4.2 is a better battery/display Nexus 5, factoring in the fact that it costs more than the Nexus 5 , Nexus 5 comes out a solid solid phone I'm really confused ........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting the g2 for same price as nexus 5 since I'm doing a complicated trade on craigslist. I'll be selling my phone to one guy and buying from another for same price. Now the issue with this is if one doesnt show up it ruins it for the other two. So hopefully it goes well. I'm sure it would be easy to sell the g2 and get a nexus 5 again if I don't like it but I feel like I'll like the g2 better just for the battery alone
Sent from my white LG Nexus 5
abdel12345 said:
I'm getting the g2 for same price as nexus 5 since I'm doing a complicated trade on craigslist. I'll be selling my phone to one guy and buying from another for same price. Now the issue with this is if one doesnt show up it ruins it for the other two. So hopefully it goes well. I'm sure it would be easy to sell the g2 and get a nexus 5 again if I don't like it but I feel like I'll like the g2 better just for the battery alone
Sent from my white LG Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the only reason i bought the G2 I found it for a steal price , I could sell it and make a few extra bucks and just keep my N5 because it's essentially the same - Display and Battery I could live with that for the right price I'm going to keep using it for a few days and decide now I'm leaning towards the G2 lol
This one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2548974
Solved my camera's problem.
Now I'm a little bit happier.
Thanks to @xdabbeb
Enviado de meu LG-D805 usando Tapatalk

Decent camera and picture quality?

Hi everyone!
I have been thinking about buying a redmi 3 mostly because it has a good cpu, long battery life and runs a newer version of Android. I currently own a Samsung Note 2 (no official lollipop update). I really like the pictures taken by the Note 2, specially under low light mode. I could not find a good review about the quality of the pictures taken by the Redmi 3. What are your opinions?
Thank you!
Cannot say about the quality to your Samsung but this compares Redmi 3 and Redmi Note 3.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vi5Pq0FDQAU
Poor camera, in low light unusable. Huawei P7 have much better camera.
Redmi 3 have adopted Samsung chip, same like on A5 and A7, and we can just hope that Xiaomi will improve camera experience by software upgrades.
Sent from my Redmi 3 using Tapatalk
Thanks for the comment, miljenko. The photos taken in good light conditions are also poor? Have you tried other camera apps to see if the pictures have a better quality? Would you recommend this phone?
actually the camera on the Pro version is amazing. Got great photos on it so far.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
limestar said:
actually the camera on the Pro version is amazing. Got great photos on it so far.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean Redmi Note 3 pro? I am asking about the Redmi 3, not the Redmi Note 3.
mura20 said:
Do you mean Redmi Note 3 pro? I am asking about the Redmi 3, not the Redmi Note 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah as I said pro!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
mura20 said:
Thanks for the comment, miljenko. The photos taken in good light conditions are also poor? Have you tried other camera apps to see if the pictures have a better quality? Would you recommend this phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phone itself is very good. Sturdy, amazing battery, fast, etc, but camera is not good. In good ligh conditions photos are acceptable for closer objects, anything further is hit and miss. For the price very good phone.
As people are talking about Note 3, for me MTK is not an option and 5,5 inch is too big.
miljenko said:
Phone itself is very good. Sturdy, amazing battery, fast, etc, but camera is not good. In good ligh conditions photos are acceptable for closer objects, anything further is hit and miss. For the price very good phone.
As people are talking about Note 3, for me MTK is not an option and 5,5 inch is too big.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MTK in Redmi Note 3 is comparable to Snapdragon 800 (even in single core performance) and it's much much faster then Snapdragon 616 used in Redmi 3 (2-3x faster) - and you feel it when you have this phone in hand.
Camera is ****ty in Redmi3.
adddaamo said:
MTK in Redmi Note 3 is comparable to Snapdragon 800 (even in single core performance) and it's much much faster then Snapdragon 616 used in Redmi 3 (2-3x faster) - and you feel it when you have this phone in hand.
Camera is ****ty in Redmi3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have another MTK 6752 phone and it is fast like lightning but there is something odd with it. Qualcomm have more fluid operations and simply it is different.
Sorry for off topic.
Sent from my Redmi 3 using Tapatalk
I have redmi 3 pro. Before that i used lumia 830, xperia z1 and iphone 5c. Redmi has lovest quality camera of all listed devices in low light conditions. Also, auto focus is bad in day light. Redmi is good device for price, but camera is like in all generic chinese phones.
Coming from a galaxy s4, the redmi 3's camera is poorer. Image is just not as sharp. However, it does have faster autofocus and shutter speed than s4. Wouldn't be using the camera for any serious photography.
Sent from my Redmi 3 using Tapatalk
I am very satisfied with the Redmi 3's camera in normal light conditions. HDR is also working pretty good giving high contrast and nice saturation.
Here some example pictures i took:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5ojcvpwoszew93s/AAA7iYkzurbmM_MOuWTAODh0a?dl=0
Camera die after 4 months used
U should not to think about it. I have bought redmi 3 and used a few month. Now camera error. It said "can't connect to camera"
It s hardware issue.
There's a Note 3 with a Snapdragon 65x, too.
Can't complain, i can squeeze some good photos out of the Redmi 3, its not GOOD like an iPhone or Lumia but it does the job (unless there's poor lighting).
The microphone isnt very good for loud recordings.

Selfie quality

You're beautiful and everyone knows it. That's why you take selfies. Rate this thread to express how the front-facing camera of the LG G6 performs. A higher rating indicates that the front camera produces fantastic results consistently.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
So far on the demo in my store, the FFC is hazy and unclear, but that's the only thing so far I'm not particularly fond of about the G6...
Front camera has been really good so far. Only have taken a couple of pics but they have been good.
Sent from my SM-N920T using XDA Labs
Nothing to write home about. A little worse than the G4 in terms of image quality imo, but the wide angle probably makes up for that in usability. If you take a lot of selfies and the quality matters to you, not sure this would be my first phone choice.
well my G6 only lasted 3 hours, my note 5 took better pics with front and rear, the G6 I had flew performance wise but the camera is not very good, wish it would have taken better pics and I might have kept it.
2003vstrom said:
well my G6 only lasted 3 hours, my note 5 took better pics with front and rear, the G6 I had flew performance wise but the camera is not very good, wish it would have taken better pics and I might have kept it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my comparison the front camera took better pics than my Note 5. I did some comparisons just for myself. However, I deleted them since I too sent back the phone.
Sent from my SM-N920T using XDA Labs
I don't know why the 5-star rating.
Every comparison video I saw of the G6 FFC showed, that it has the worst result of all (vs P10,iP7,GS8,OP3T).
Anyone can post for the compare picture that taken by G6 and other new top devices?
The selfie camera is poor to say the least. The front camera on my S6 seems a lot better sadly..
Grainy and not focused no matter how much or little light there is.
The worst Selfie camera I ever seen on a 500 dollars flagship. Big **** omg, low light pic are ****, blured with grain, and high light photo quality is bad. 100% ****, wtf is this sensor ? I so disappointed..
le grand angle est plus utile que le selfie quand on habite près du Puy de Dome
Weird very little issues here. Low light sucks % but other than that I'm happy
yeah it's extremely blurred imo! so much smudge.
The Apostle said:
In my comparison the front camera took better pics than my Note 5. I did some comparisons just for myself. However, I deleted them since I too sent back the phone.
Sent from my SM-N920T using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you sent it back?
dearbasheer said:
Why did you sent it back?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No root.
The Apostle said:
No root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a new phone. Root exploit will happen soon, I guess.
dearbasheer said:
It is a new phone. Root exploit will happen soon, I guess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not exactly new anymore. I picked up a oneplus 3t and couldn't be happier.
And I thought G4 had a bad selfie camera.. what a disaster.
Use the rear wide angle camera for selfies, don't know why LG dropped from 8mp to 5mp. LG V30 front camera 5mp seems better than the LG G6.

How is this compared to nexus 5?

I am on a nexus 5, fed up with slow Oreo and low battery and no Volte. How is this device comaped to N5? I will use a custom ROM like PE or LOS, so how is
1)Camera
2) Battery
3) Performance
Compared to nexus 5?
Did anyone updgrade from nexus 5? What is your opinion?
I am eyeing this device since it has official LOS.
Also, is there much difference while playing a game or casual use between SD800,625? Unable to decide between Lenovo Z2 plus and this device.
I will be getting the Snapdragon variant in my market
GopalKaul said:
I am on a nexus 5, fed up with slow Oreo and low battery and no Volte. How is this device comaped to N5? I will use a custom ROM like PE or LOS, so how is
1)Camera
2) Battery
3) Performance
Compared to nexus 5?
Did anyone updgrade from nexus 5? What is your opinion?
I am eyeing this device since it has official LOS.
Also, is there much difference while playing a game or casual use between SD800,625? Unable to decide between Lenovo Z2 plus and this device.
I will be getting the Snapdragon variant in my market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SD800 is slightly faster looking purely at performance but it heats up pretty quickly and is not very battery efficient (28nm. manufacturing process)
SD625 is amazing when it comes to battery because it's 14nm manufacturing process so the heat is much lower, it's incredibly power efficient and consumes way less battery and generally does not overheat.. it scores about 15k lower in Antutu which is still pretty good.
Camera in Redmi Note 4 is mediocre, Nexus 5 wins here.. especially stock. Homever there are camera mods which help to increase quality, like ported Google Cam with working HDR+.
Battery Redmi Note 4 will destroy Nexus 5, you will be getting atleast twice better battery life compared between the 2. (like i mentioned earlier it's due to the super power efficient SD625 and 14nm manufacturing process but also pretty big battery - 4100mAh)
Edit:
In thread title you are talking about Nexus 5 but in post you are talking about Lenovo Z2 Plus.. make up your mind, and yeah Lenovo Z2 Plus is much better than both Nexus 5 and Redmi Note 4.
k3lcior said:
SD800 is slightly faster looking purely at performance but it heats up pretty quickly and is not very battery efficient (28nm. manufacturing process)
SD625 is amazing when it comes to battery because it's 14nm manufacturing process so the heat is much lower, it's incredibly power efficient and consumes way less battery and generally does not overheat.. it scores about 15k lower in Antutu which is still pretty good.
Camera in Redmi Note 4 is mediocre, Nexus 5 wins here.. especially stock. Homever there are camera mods which help to increase quality, like ported Google Cam with working HDR+.
Battery Redmi Note 4 will destroy Nexus 5, you will be getting atleast twice better battery life compared between the 2. (like i mentioned earlier it's due to the super power efficient SD625 and 14nm manufacturing process but also pretty big battery - 4100mAh)
Edit:
In thread title you are talking about Nexus 5 but in post you are talking about Lenovo Z2 Plus.. make up your mind, and yeah Lenovo Z2 Plus is much better than both Nexus 5 and Redmi Note 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am comparing nexus 5 and redmi note 4, if both are not good then Z2 plus....
Also, with HDR+ how is this camera?
GopalKaul said:
I am comparing nexus 5 and redmi note 4, if both are not good then Z2 plus....
Also, with HDR+ how is this camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's decent but only in day light, night and low light pics are pretty bad, same goes for videos which additionally have some issues with LOUD sound, like in concerts. Just Google it, you should find samples easily.
Generally if you use camera alot I would not recommend Redmi Note 4.
k3lcior said:
It's decent but only in day light, night and low light pics are pretty bad, same goes for videos which additionally have some issues with LOUD sound, like in concerts. Just Google it, you should find samples easily.
Generally if you use camera alot I would not recommend Redmi Note 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus 5 has a pretty bad camera too?. If it at par with nexus 5 , great! Else , bummer...
Hi, I have both. I actually upgraded from Nexus 5 (still have it, but with cracked sceen). The battery life can not be compared as the Nexus has very bad and the Note 4 has excellent. The camera middle range both (for me enough). My Note has 4G RAM, so the performance is better (newer phone anyway). The screen is also same category. The grip of the Nexus is way much better, than the very slippery Xiao. I really like my Nexus, that´s why I have it for like 3,5 years already, but dated a bit. The Note is 1 month old and I´m satisfied with it.
Sorry for the bad quality pic, but if you wanna compare the size it´s ok. The Note is somewhat larger and heavier.
krisztian b said:
Hi, I have both. I actually upgraded from Nexus 5 (still have it, but with cracked sceen). The battery life can not be compared as the Nexus has very bad and the Note 4 has excellent. The camera middle range both (for me enough). My Note has 4G RAM, so the performance is better (newer phone anyway). The screen is also same category. The grip of the Nexus is way much better, than the very slippery Xiao. I really like my Nexus, that´s why I have it for like 3,5 years already, but dated a bit. The Note is 1 month old and I´m satisfied with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You ever used moto g5 plus or Zuk Z2?
I had Nexus 5,Galaxy S6, HTC 10, Axon 7, Huawei P9 and now I "downgraded" to a Redmi Note 4 .
Battery life is awesome. I trip alot and I'm the only one in my group that dosen't carry a battery pack.
Performance is awesome. Yes,for like 15-20 minutes any Snapdragon 805+(805,810,808,820) is faster but the Snapdragon 625 dosen't throttle. In games it's solid as a rock. It's a little laggy in facebook but I don't mind.
Camera is ok. I have a Redmi Note 4 with a Samsung sensor. I have a pretty expansive DSLR if I want more but I never need more in a normal day. The dual flash is strong.
Screen is pretty meh. I have a Tianma pannel and after 4 months of usage I have 6-7 stuck pixels . I don't really mind as I don't really see them in day to day basis . It's not a great screen it's not a bad screen.
I'd buy the Note 4 if I were you.
I wouldn't buy a G5 plus if I were you. Moto delivered it with a 32 bit ROM. Yeah,you'll find 64bit ROMs on XDA but it's laggy,buggy and it will be for a while.
GopalKaul said:
You ever used moto g5 plus or Zuk Z2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, unfortunately. Can´t compare them.
---------- Post added at 08:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:05 PM ----------
Robert- said:
I had Nexus 5,Galaxy S6, HTC 10, Axon 7, Huawei P9 and now I "downgraded" to a Redmi Note 4 .
Battery life is awesome. I trip alot and I'm the only one in my group that dosen't carry a battery pack.
Performance is awesome. Yes,for like 15-20 minutes any Snapdragon 805+(805,810,808,820) is faster but the Snapdragon 625 dosen't throttle. In games it's solid as a rock. It's a little laggy in facebook but I don't mind.
Camera is ok. I have a Redmi Note 4 with a Samsung sensor. I have a pretty expansive DSLR if I want more but I never need more in a normal day. The dual flash is strong.
Screen is pretty meh. I have a Tianma pannel and after 4 months of usage I have 6-7 stuck pixels . I don't really mind as I don't really see them in day to day basis . It's not a great screen it's not a bad screen.
I'd buy the Note 4 if I were you.
I wouldn't buy a G5 plus if I were you. Moto delivered it with a 32 bit ROM. Yeah,you'll find 64bit ROMs on XDA but it's laggy,buggy and it will be for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree.
GopalKaul said:
You ever used moto g5 plus or Zuk Z2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Used zuk z2 plus and redmi note 4 both... Zuk z2 heats too much.. Their ui is not good and battery life also low.... Go for redmi note 4
Either way, you'll be disappointed at some point. Nexus is nexus, nothing can replace that. You will be amazed with battery life but that's pretty much only thing this phone gives. I hate this phone , crappiest phone I've ever had. Run away from Chinese phones.
GopalKaul said:
1)Camera
2) Battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life is awesome. The camera is mediocre (with Samsung or Sony sensor). With Omnivision sensor, the camera can be quite poor. If you are really into great photography, this is not the phone for you.

Low light

At the club, at the bar, or just in your mom's basement, nighttime is when you come out to play. Rate this thread to express how the Samsung Galaxy Note 9's camera performs when no or low light is present. A higher rating indicates that the camera sensor "sees" lots of light in dim conditions, and that the resulting photos have minimal noise. A higher rating also indicates that when the flash fires, the resulting photo is evenly-lit without any bright spots.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Wifi in car
nice article
Starry night
Thought this came out pretty good, rocket launch from the other night
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Not great like p20 pro
It takes amazing low light pictures. Pitch dark images look like daylight, Best I have seen.
I don`t have this model but am interested in the topic as well because I would like to buy Galaxy note 9, and a camera is one of the things I pay most attention to when buying a phone!
huitrWER said:
I don`t have this model but am interested in the topic as well because I would like to buy Galaxy note 9, and a camera is one of the things I pay most attention to when buying a phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Average with low light and night shots
Mate 20 pro camera much better
rowihel2012 said:
Average with low light and night shots
Mate 20 pro camera much better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am an Note 9 user.
But I agree that Mate 20 pro is amazing and the triple lens system at the back is just DOPE.
DickDokster said:
I am an Note 9 user.
But I agree that Mate 20 pro is amazing and the triple lens system at the back is just DOPE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Getting the beast soon
Mate 20X
??
rowihel2012 said:
Getting the beast soon
Mate 20X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Congrats Man:good:
Share your thoughts after using the device.
I'm satisfyied with results even coming from a pixel 2 xl with night sight. Note 9 has better overall results and more realistic photos.
DickDokster said:
I am an Note 9 user.
But I agree that Mate 20 pro is amazing and the triple lens system at the back is just DOPE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much!
It seems that you know much about gadgets for taking pictures, can you advise me on any really excellent camera ? What manufacturer or maybe a particular model may be the best one to buy?
Does the Note 9 still have a weird orange tint in really low light shots?
In my experience low light pic are pretty good, not as great as a night sight but decent
huitrWER said:
Thank you very much!
It seems that you know much about gadgets for taking pictures, can you advise me on any really excellent camera ? What manufacturer or maybe a particular model may be the best one to buy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say that I am not that good with cameras yes I have an Canon EOS 80D which is old camera an it doesn't support 4K. The thing is currently now in market there is a lot of options(Cameras).
This blogs can help you in comparing the brands and different models they offer.
Check this
https://www.techradar.com/news/best-camera
https://www.creativebloq.com/features/best-camera
Cristiano Matos said:
I'm satisfyied with results even coming from a pixel 2 xl with night sight. Note 9 has better overall results and more realistic photos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's more about personal preference. Note 9 wins in pure hardware (both vs pixel 2 and pixel 3), but google has a really impressive AI for the pictures processing. The thing is, processing can take you that far before it starts to show it's drawbacks. The note 9 just relies on strong hardware to extract the maximum possible without over-processing thus leading to a vastly different approach compared to google (and to some extend huawei too).
Lowlight performance can be improved with a working google camera modd. Check out this comparison https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZSW6Y3FTC4
matlear said:
Starry night
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nic pic I love shooting pics at night. Thanks for helping me make the decision to upgrade from the Note 8 to 9.
matlear said:
Starry night
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it for real a Note 9 photo? That's the exposure on this?
---------- Post added at 07:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:50 AM ----------
Cristiano Matos said:
I'm satisfyied with results even coming from a pixel 2 xl with night sight. Note 9 has better overall results and more realistic photos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The noise amount on these is indistinguishable. Haven't been looking up for a new gadgets for a several years and looks like the future is now.

Categories

Resources