what do u think about antutu scores ? model s9 plus
android 8 : processor 93.000 android 9: 88.000
android 8 gpu: 94.000 android 9: 107.000
android 8 ux: 56.000 android 9: 53.000
android 8 ram: 8600 android 9: 8400
why antutu scores was decrease ? only increase gpu score.
planned obsolescence ?
brk.1905 said:
what do u think about antutu scores ? model s9 plus
android 8 : processor 93.000 android 9: 88.000
android 8 gpu: 94.000 android 9: 107.000
android 8 ux: 56.000 android 9: 53.000
android 8 ram: 8600 android 9: 8400
why antutu scores was decrease ? only increase gpu score.
planned obsolescence ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not planned obsolescence, there are many things that affect scores especially going to a new OS update. Kernel optimizations, OS background services and features affect scores for example.
And based on your results:
-5.4% CPU performance change
+12.1% GPU performance
-5.4% User experience (OS performance score)
-2.3% RAM performance
Scores 5% or less is negligible as it is within margin of error. If u look at the GPU score its a huge improvement. Bear in mind I am only looking at your results. Most likely you did an OTA update from Oreo and it isnt a good comparison as it isnt a clean PIE vs clean OREO benchmark.
I myself have problems with PIE update and had to revert to OREO, something are worse with PIE and I have had apps crashing. Also, Oreo is much smoother for me when i did a downgrade, and I will be running Antutu myself to see if I get the same OREO scores.
EDIT:
CPU 89894
GPU 93097
UX 54489
RAM 8267
OREO on clean install Antutu. It looks like your initial scores on OREO was a tad high. PIE does not slow down your phone.
thanks for info
Related
Wow did a antutu test on both of my phones and was expecting my L 9 to beat my escape. Boy was I suprised! My l 9 got a 10,568 ( pretty good compared to some). Then I ran the escape. My jaw dropped when I saw the amazing score of 15139. WHOA, it beat it in every catagory except RAM operation. My l 9 is running kumas rom with pure performance tweaks with cpu overclocked at 1.2 ghz. The escape is running sphinx rom with no cpu tweaks. Strange thing is every stats info I see on the escape says it has 1.2 ghz dc snapdragon. However im getting 1.5 ghz??? hmm Whats everyone else scores looking like for their L 9 ?
I get around 11k running mateo's CM 10.2 ROM.
Sent from my LG-P765 using Tapatalk
I have 9,616 running CyanogenMod 10.2 official (19/11/2013) :crying:
DarwinDeLaRosa said:
I have 9,616 running CyanogenMod 10.2 official (19/11/2013) :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because custom rom overclock both CPU & GPU so it has higher score.
My L9 on CM 10.2 by mateo with stock cpu and gpu speeds i have 9843 pts
With CPU at 1,2 GHz i have 10671
With stock CPU and GPU at 384 MHz i have 9732 pts
With CPU at 1,2 GHz and GPU at 384 MHz i have 10706
With CPU at 1,35 GHz and GPU at 384 MHz i have 11502
lwg45714 said:
My l 9 is running kumas rom with pure performance tweaks with cpu overclocked at 1.2 ghz. The escape is running sphinx rom with no cpu tweaks. Strange thing is every stats info I see on the escape says it has 1.2 ghz dc snapdragon. However im getting 1.5 ghz??? hmm Whats everyone else scores looking like for their L 9 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your LG Escape has got a better cpu and gpu and it would have shown better performance anyway. My L9 running stock showed maximum of 9600 with pure performance tweaks. But I don't think Antutu points can give you a good idea of how fast and smooth your phone is
madheado said:
Your LG Escape has got a better cpu and gpu and it would have shown better performance anyway. My L9 running stock showed maximum of 9600 with pure performance tweaks. But I don't think Antutu points can give you a good idea of how fast and smooth your phone is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I was getting at. Despite having a better cpu and gpu on the escape using both phones side by side in real world use the L9 performs better ALL around. The gpu was a big part of the escapes high score. However in side by side comparisons the L9S graphics seems to look better and out perform the escape. So I honestly believe all benchmark scores reflects what the phones software/hardware is CAPABLE of performing not really HOW it performs with daily use. This would explain why a score can as much as double by simply running a custom rom. I would never solely base my opinion of a phones performance on a benchmark score. Sure it can give you a idea of what its software/hardware is capable of. However you cant honestly get a true feel for the performance until you try the phone. So my escape murders my L9 in benchmark scores. BUT my L9 murders my escape in real life usable performance. Anyone else agree with this?
lwg45714 said:
BUT my L9 murders my escape in real life usable performance. Anyone else agree with this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I got your point! I guess, the only good thing about the Escape's cpu and gpu is that it's more battery-friendly, isn't it?
madheado said:
Yeah, I got your point! I guess, the only good thing about the Escape's cpu and gpu is that it's more battery-friendly, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, and both phones use the exact same battery. The escapes standby battery life is much longer than the L9 . During normal use the escape lasts longer as well by not to the degree of the standby difference.
Hi. I'd love to see a face to face comparison between 2 identical smartphones, one running Android ARMv7 32-bit and the other one running Android ARMv8 64-bit, preferably Marshmallow, although Lollipop 5.1.1 would do it fine too. I've thought that the LG Nexus 5X would be a good phone to test the difference between these 2 versions of Android.
Which one would be faster restarting?
Which one would have the CPU colder when decoding videos (Full HD or even 4K)? And CPU load?
What would be the main differences?
Ram usage and if it would be a problem having "only" 2GB of RAM like the 5X.
Benchmarks.
CPU usage and load under same conditions in both terminals, CPU temp monitoring to see the theoretical improvements ARMv8 have done.
Can anyone do it?
Up!
Anybody with the latest April patch care to test GeekBench and Antutu on their device? I am getting a low 1390/3700 on GB and 135k on Antutu, wondering if there is something wrong with my device or the new patch throttles during benchmarks?
All seems well with mine
With April security patch:
Antutu : 147202.
GeekBench single core : 1738 / multi core : 4172.
Sorry to revive an old thread, but I just got a Tab S3 (SM-T825Y) recently and it feels really sluggish. I only get 108,413 on Antutu and ~1100 Single-Core, 3455 Multi-Core on Geekbench.
I'm on T825YDXU2BRJ1, patch level 1 Oct 2018.
Anyone else notice any sluggishness?
Hi Guys , i need tips in fixing performance issue im lg v30 the cpu performance is throttling quite heavily in stock oreo that emulator performance is dropping and can not run games full speed while s8 with same snapdragom processor run the emulator full speed. Any tips ro improve this? I already get the tutorial to update gpu driver here to v313 The stock gpu driver in oreo is horribel using very old gpu driver
From the look of it the stock kernel max speed is 1900mhz and even that it move fasly up and down throttling heavily,any alternative to stock kernel or info about the stock kernel gorvenor?
I have t-mobile variant and it does run constantly at 1.9ghz on little cores, but BIG cores run varying from 2.1 to 2.4ghz. The only emulator i'm using right now are Retroarch64 and ppsspp it's all running well at 30fps. Some refurbished V30 doesn't have heat pipe inside for better cooling, it may throttle cpu during certain workloads AND actually not all SD835 work similar, some device might better or worse depends on thermal regulation, or android optimization.
lg got the worst score 164k antutu for me compared to normal 200k snapdragon 835 , this phone got high end cpu with midrange performance what a waste
immns said:
I have t-mobile variant and it does run constantly at 1.9ghz on little cores, but BIG cores run varying from 2.1 to 2.4ghz. The only emulator i'm using right now are Retroarch64 and ppsspp it's all running well at 30fps. Some refurbished V30 doesn't have heat pipe inside for better cooling, it may throttle cpu during certain workloads AND actually not all SD835 work similar, some device might better or worse depends on thermal regulation, or android optimization.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to know? I got the us998 version but dont know if its ref or not? The problem is on dolphin emulator, the ppsspp does run full speed
amdultra said:
How to know? I got the us998 version but dont know if its ref or not? The problem is on dolphin emulator, the ppsspp does run full speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how to know what? you can see cpu stats on EX Kernel Manager, maybe kernelauditor as well. It's true that little cluster could only go as far as 1900 not more, but big cluster can go up to 2,45ghz as listed on 835's specs. I don't know, maybe bloated software could have some impact too. have you tried using custom rom? some say it'll improve much in gaming performance. it's worth a shot (few shots i guess, since there are many of them :laugh.
Wantrd to ubl but i need to backup things, will inform later on the thread. Thingkjng to sell the devices for poco or note 8 but i love the features on this devices so much !
I don't know about how much the benchmark reflect
real life performance of device but this is interesting.
few day ago i was talking to my friend who has same phone redmi note 7 pro and he said that his older phone which was Xiaomi A2 was better performing in pubg.
i didn't agree because it has 512 gpu and redmi note 7 pro has 612 gpu so i told him that this gpu is updated and is better than 512, but then i started to compare both gpu on this website
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Adreno-612-vs-Adreno-512_9876_8778.247598.0.html
and i was surprised by the results
and the i opened 3dmark website to check and i found that in gpu performance redmi note 7s, redmi note 7, and Mi A2 perform better that redmi note 7 pro how is this possible or how this processor or gpu upgrade work in phones.
this is the link of 3dmark result of phones
https://benchmarks.ul.com/compare/best-smartphones?displaySize=3.0,13.4&search=redmi note 7
I think I am the right one to answer this. I own both devices, and trust me... Rn7pro is miles ahead in terms of cpu and GPU performance from Mi a2.
Your friend sounds like a tool. I don't know about the benchmarks, but pubg by default selected high settings in graphics on rn7pro. And also by default, you can go upto ultra fps settings without using any graphics tool for PUBG.
Whereas in mi a2, pubg selects medium fps and by default the maximum fps supported is high.
I play on ultra settings and the rn7pro maintains a steady 40-45 fps(goes upto 52 depending on the scene being rendered).
Also keep in mind that qualcomm's series 6xx processors are based on custom kryo architecture.
Snapdragon 675 even beats 710 and 712 in benchmarks. The reason is the fact that Snapdragon 675 is based on kryo 460 model. Google all this and you will come to know what these terms mean. Snapdragon 660 which powers mi a2 is miles behind both in GPU and cpu performance.