Low sales of LG G2 - G2 General

The artical at androidheadlines says about significantly less sales figures of LG G2 in spite of being great phone. (I can not paste link here).
It says :
LG wanted to sell at least 3 million units internationally, too, but they’ve only sold 2.3 million, which is 20 percent less than what they were expecting to sell. To reach even those 2.3 million customers, LG had to increase its marketing budget, too, but it doesn’t look like their marketing campaigns have been very effective. Unfortunately for LG, marketing campaign effectiveness also depends on how strong your brand is and if you’re the kind of company that creates excellent products.
Whosoever has seen my G2 mobile felt that it is the one of the best phone which they also should have owned. However, most of them were pretty unaware (before they saw my phone) about LG G2.
What are the reasons do you all feel for low sales figures?
In my opinion, may be following are the reason for its poor sales,
1) Poor Marketting ?? - In India, I see that LG has advertised phone very poorly. Even their advertisements were not that catchy when compared to Sony Xperia Z1, iphone and Samsung phones.
2) Brand Value ?? - LG is not considered as top brand for their phones. In fact LG G2 is my first LG phone. Before that I have used Nokia N900, Galaxy S2, HTC, iphone...but never ever thought of buying LG phone.
3) Not removable battery ??
4) Position of buttons ??
5) Competion has better mobiles ?? - Samsung Galaxy S4 and Note 3, Xperia Z1, Iphone 5S, Lumia 1020
6) Launch of Nexus 5 ??
Do you see any other reason for its poor sale?

Another reason would be bad update behavior on previous phones.

Fir3blade said:
Another reason would be bad update behavior on previous phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it's LG's update policy. The Mainstream doesn't care when or how they get updates, they even don't know which is the current Android Version. We (here on XDA) are only a view percent of all Consumers.
Although i agree on bad Marketing. On the launch of the S4 there've been dozens of TV commercials, Newspaper adds and and and .. honestly i haven't seen a single TV commercial about the G2
Before the G2 i owned the S4, which was rather quickly sold (no regrets - bad Phone in my opinion) and the HTC One. Seen the G2 in a Phoneshop and quickly fallen in love with it.
But anyhow that's the burden of small Phone builder companies like LG or HTC. They suffer from the almighty Samsung even they build the much better Phones. I always would prefer a HTC or LG device over Samsung but that's not what the mainstream thinks

Its just visibility thats hurting them. The HTC One and S4 get all the headlines in the Android world, as far as branded unit go, and the N5 gets all the headlines as far as software is concerned, but the nexus isnt a big seller, despite what the Nexus nazis think.

LG should take this as a learning curve and make sure LG G2 is updated quickly, also adveritse the next phone a more. The G Flex has got some coverage beacuse G2 rolled the ball for LG, now it is upto them to keep the momentum going.
2.3 million might not be a great number, but it is the beggining, probably LG will end with 2.5 million which is still pretty decent. This is how Galaxy series started for Samsung, G2 can do the same for LG.

It's all marketing. People will buy anything shoved in their face.
I'm in Malaysia and my G2 is a Taiwan set since LG Malaysia doesn't care at all to launch this device here. Luckily lots of importer saw this opportunity to sell imported sets here.
Brand? LG seems to be doing well in other department. It's all about marketing really. I was in Aeon plaza the other day. People were all flocking in Samsung shop while Sony shop next door is empty.
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app

What a shame. This is such a great phone.
I agree that the problem is branding and marketing. Samsung marketing budget is insane.

I see LG commercials on TV all the time, plus the carriers seem to be pushing the phone. I guess it comes down to brand recognition and a bad reputation of being slow on updates..if any at all, they're headed down the right track if they keep the momentum going, 2014 could be a successful year for them.

I think the problem lies with the salespeople. When I was waiting for the Sprint variant to come out, I went to 5 different stores that sold cell phones (2 best buys, 2 AT&T stores, and a Sprint store.) Only one of them, of the five had a G2 on the display. There weren't any advertisements for the G2 (posters, nothing.) in 3 of the stores, and 2 of the stores the salespeople didn't even know what a G2 was.
The only store that had a demo unit was the second Best Buy I visited and when I went to pick up my device from them, they insisted I go with the Note 3. I just have to say, with Samsung being the standard, it's hard to fight against but LG's marketing is very weak here, at least in Jacksonville FL. Of course, all five stores I visited had Samsung ads plastered on every square inch of available space they had.

One thing: LG needs to dish out faster updates. Like Kitkat should come in Jan 2014 itself. All the trch websites are bound to pick up on that. Samsung nerds did good publicity for them and hence they are where they are. LG needs to make sure that whatever limited customer base they have gets the best service in terms of hardware and software.
Average buyers will follow soon.

1 For many people that know about the companies, it's the history of the updates. I was very hesitant because of that. That can be corrected if they push out updates and keep them coming for at least a couple android versions. Look at Samsung's reputation after the Moment. That phone was a pain in the arse and turned me off of Samsung. But they have definitely come back from that. LG can do the same by keeping this phone up to date.
1 For the general population is the timing. A LOT of people renewed their contracts with a HTC One, or the S4 or Note3. So they "couldn't" get the G2, because they don't want to pay full price.
Having a removable battery and an SDcard slot would have been a huge benefit.
Marketing would have helped a lot too, especially for companies like Sprint with the G2 being the first phone to support Sprint Spark. And for Verizon to advertise more about the wireless charging being built in.
For the comment about the sales people, at the Sprint store I went to, they highly recommended the G2 when I went in to compare the S4 and the G2.

I think it's due to the marketing of the device more so than the reputation of LG. I've seen maybe 5 G2 commercials on prime time TV shows. They need to sell the strengths of the phone, which to me is the speed and the huge battery. Only once have I completely drained the battery and that's because I was using it literally all day. If they sold it like the droids 48 hour battery life and mentioned the processor is on par with a new laptop people would be more interested. I think Samsung has cornered the market with the S4 because of their marketing. Don't they have a marketing budget of like $24 BILLION next year? It's hard to compete with something like that.

Personally, I'm always apprehensive about buying any sort of electronics device. I never want to get stuck with a lemon but sometimes it happens. The only thing I can do to try to avoid that is to read and watch reviews to get a better sense of whats out there. Sales people are generally going to do whats best for them. They want the commission. So that said, I almost didn't go with the G2 because the reviews were very negative. In retrospect, I can honestly say the reviews were incredibly unfair. But the average person might be swayed by them. Seriously, if Apple or Samsung put the volume and power button in the middle of the back of the phone it would be hailed as innovation. But LG did it and it was panned. The funny thing is, I don't think its nearly that big of a change as reviews made it out to be.

I think Post #2 hit the nail on the head.
LG really screwed over every previous owner with updates. And you can't say "oh the average user doesn't care about updates" is a big load of crap. People have been expecting updates ever since the first iPhone. This isn't 2005 where everyone has a flip dumbphone. EVERYONE looks for updates. Why do you think Samsung is so big now? Because everyone knows that Samsung will push 1-2 updates out to you and the software is quality. LG got the G2 right with software and hardware quality (no bugs or broken issues) but past LG phones have been notoriously known for having quirky bugs (reboot issues, overheating, GPS, etc) and never getting updated.
LG's previously history is so bad, that I am receiving Class Action Lawsuit papers in the mail on the LG G2x.
This hurts sales and it is nobodies fault except LG. This is exactly what happens when you don't take care of your customers (in any aspect; washer/dryer, tv, etc). I love the G2, as many do, but I really really really beat myself up over picking one up. I almost didn't do it just because it had LG on the front.
I can see LG has a winner with the G2. Their marketing team is doing a great job because I am seeing tons of commercials and ads for it. The name is getting out there and sales will probably be steady moving forward. But LG has to keep the ball moving with a steady stream of updates for the G2 or else they will be right back in the same "oh our sales numbers are low and we don't know why" category next generation.

Bad marketing and the name brand are the culprits.
An average Joe doesn't know and doesn't care about what inside the device, left alone which version of the OS. They don't know whether its 4.2.2 or 4.4.2. Average Joes don't care about the update, they just simply want to use the phone.
Samsung is too big in the market and overshadow the LG, not only in the the Android phone market but also in TV market.

It's the brand and marketing. Plane and simple. A name like galaxy sticks in your head. You hear droid... and you know what someone is talking about. G2? It doesn't stick in the mind. People like catchy. Also, Sammy slammed the crap out of iPhones in its commercials. The next big thing is already here. That's genius. Learning from you.. yawn lol. Why did the og droid do so well? Was it better then an iPhone at the time? No.. but it's ad campaign and branding was amazing. The idont commercial was one of the best ever.
When non android users ask me about my g2.. they say one of 2 things. Is that one of those galaxy phones or is that a droid phone?
When the galaxy nexus was first leaked, it was either the droid nexus or nexus prime. I was actually really bummed when it was called a galaxy because of how cool nexus prime sounded to me. Point is, I almost didn't buy it because of its name.
Branding matters....
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

I think how its been marketed and not the quantity of ads. I've seen a ton of ads in southern California, but it's all about the back buttons and camera.
If they focused on how much of a beast it is, it might have turned a few more heads.
The droid 48 hour claim ain't nothing (good commercial though). I'm on hour 58 with 25% battery remaining.
It's a beast, sell it as such.
My $0.02
Sent from my LG-D800 using xda app-developers app

They definitely need to push the battery more in their advertising. It's the only reason I got this over the Nexus 5!

player911 said:
I think Post #2 hit the nail on the head.
LG really screwed over every previous owner with updates. And you can't say "oh the average user doesn't care about updates" is a big load of crap. People have been expecting updates ever since the first iPhone. This isn't 2005 where everyone has a flip dumbphone. EVERYONE looks for updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is simply not true. Out of EVERYONE I know with an Android phone, not a single one of them has EVER asked me how I like the new update, or when will we get an update. EVER. Those of us that know anything about upcoming updates are the rarity. We only know about them because of the sites we visit and participate in. Most likely a fraction of a % of the total smartphone universe.
Thanks Devs. From my VZW G2.

trickster2369 said:
This is simply not true. Out of EVERYONE I know with an Android phone, not a single one of them has EVER asked me how I like the new update, or when will we get an update. EVER. Those of us that know anything about upcoming updates are the rarity. We only know about them because of the sites we visit and participate in. Most likely a fraction of a % of the total smartphone universe.
Thanks Devs. From my VZW G2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My colleague has said this to me, "All I did is install an update and everything looks different."
I believe that people want to be on the latest software available to them, but don't have the slightest clue what's different between versions.

Related

I really don't understand HTC!

Just saw the Youtube video with the leaked Ville, and it simply is a minor hardware downgrade from HTC Amaze. The front camera is VGA, our is 2M, the back camera has single flash, our is dual, has a plastic back cover, the screen resolution and size is the same, the processor is clocked at 1.5 wouldnt be surprised if it's the same model... Most likely, they will sell it for $199 with a 2-year plan. What I don't understand is, instead of focusing on further development and advertisement of such a solid device as Amaze 4G, put the price a bit down and make profit out of far bigger sales, HTC come every month with 5 different models with weird ass names, sell some, and then move on and forget about them, no support no ****, phone owners feel screwed, and move to other companies' phones... I feel the same way after reading Amaze 4G is near "end-of-life" phase, after only 3 months of sales, which means after the already promised ICS update this phone, despite its potential, will be forgotten by T-Mobile and HTC. If that happens this surely will be my final HTC phone! Do they even realize how many phone models they have issued in the past year? Samsung has had the Galaxy line for almost 2 years, they develop it, support it, and as a result they sell bigger even than Apple, so wtf is wrong with HTC's marketing office, are they on drugs, dont they see whats the winning marketing strategy right now?
The issue is that Google who bought Android is trying to monopolize just as badly as Apple is.
WHY would HTC be virtually the first company to comply with Googles' "3 key phone" marketing push is what I want to know?
I, for one, will be waiting for SOME time before buying another smartphone as it costs too much.
Thanks Google & HTC!
lgtsanev said:
Just saw the Youtube video with the leaked Ville, and it simply is a minor hardware downgrade from HTC Amaze. The front camera is VGA, our is 2M, the back camera has single flash, our is dual, has a plastic back cover, the screen resolution and size is the same, the processor is clocked at 1.5 wouldnt be surprised if it's the same model... Most likely, they will sell it for $199 with a 2-year plan. What I don't understand is, instead of focusing on further development and advertisement of such a solid device as Amaze 4G, put the price a bit down and make profit out of far bigger sales, HTC come every month with 5 different models with weird ass names, sell some, and then move on and forget about them, no support no ****, phone owners feel screwed, and move to other companies' phones... I feel the same way after reading Amaze 4G is near "end-of-life" phase, after only 3 months of sales, which means after the already promised ICS update this phone, despite its potential, will be forgotten by T-Mobile and HTC. If that happens this surely will be my final HTC phone! Do they even realize how many phone models they have issued in the past year? Samsung has had the Galaxy line for almost 2 years, they develop it, support it, and as a result they sell bigger even than Apple, so wtf is wrong with HTC's marketing office, are they on drugs, dont they see whats the winning marketing strategy right now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ +1
Exactly what I was thinking. Well said.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
I just hope HTC doesn't turn into an iPhone, that's the reason I went with HTC because apple has stupid restrictions on their phones. You have so much more freedom and I feel that now Google is feeling targeted by the 4s which is stupid. I think market speaks louder than words though their is only so much that we will take as far as downgrading our standards with phones. It may take a while but they will get the hint eventually.
PS. Why is google pushing 3 key phones?
TramainM said:
I just hope HTC doesn't turn into an iPhone, that's the reason I went with HTC because apple has stupid restrictions on their phones. You have so much more freedom and I feel that now Google is feeling targeted by the 4s which is stupid. I think market speaks louder than words though their is only so much that we will take as far as downgrading our standards with phones. It may take a while but they will get the hint eventually.
PS. Why is google pushing 3 key phones?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Consumer pressure does nice things, doesn't it?!
Google is pushing 3 key phones just to tighten it's monopolization strategy.
The search key does not need to be removed....Apple anyone?
stefnuts said:
Consumer pressure does nice things, doesn't it?!
Google is pushing 3 key phones just to tighten it's monopolization strategy.
The search key does not need to be removed....Apple anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally hate the search button. Never used it. It is a waste of space. So I can care less if they removed it lol
I just hope HTC doesn't turn into an iPhone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC surely hopes it can turn something into an iPhone like success, but based on their track record I highly doubt it. People predicted lackluster 4S sales since it was an incremental upgrade but instead they sold more than ever. Apple is kicking butt with essentially two phones (the iPhone 4S was 89% of approximately 37 million iPhones sold in Q4). Again this is with an incremental upgrade. Apple's hardware margins on the iPhone 4 and 4S are excellent so they are raking in the bucks with these sales numbers.
I've not heard anything on the horizon from HTC that can compete with the iPhone 4S and with a major upgrade expected for the iPhone 5 my guess is the HTC market share will drop in 2012.
<rant>
It's hard to take but the folks like us at XDA are a very small market so there isn't a lot of business driver to provide open phones for people to hack on. I wish it were different but I don't see that changing. Too few care about S-OFF or root for it to be a profit driver and believe me when I say that HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. care more about profits than making XDA members happy.
</rant>
lgtsanev said:
Just saw the Youtube video with the leaked Ville, and it simply is a minor hardware downgrade from HTC Amaze. The front camera is VGA, our is 2M, the back camera has single flash, our is dual, has a plastic back cover, the screen resolution and size is the same, the processor is clocked at 1.5 wouldnt be surprised if it's the same model... Most likely, they will sell it for $199 with a 2-year plan. What I don't understand is, instead of focusing on further development and advertisement of such a solid device as Amaze 4G, put the price a bit down and make profit out of far bigger sales, HTC come every month with 5 different models with weird ass names, sell some, and then move on and forget about them, no support no ****, phone owners feel screwed, and move to other companies' phones... I feel the same way after reading Amaze 4G is near "end-of-life" phase, after only 3 months of sales, which means after the already promised ICS update this phone, despite its potential, will be forgotten by T-Mobile and HTC. If that happens this surely will be my final HTC phone! Do they even realize how many phone models they have issued in the past year? Samsung has had the Galaxy line for almost 2 years, they develop it, support it, and as a result they sell bigger even than Apple, so wtf is wrong with HTC's marketing office, are they on drugs, dont they see whats the winning marketing strategy right now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they drink rakia all the time brat
hasoon2000 said:
I personally hate the search button. Never used it. It is a waste of space. So I can care less if they removed it lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA App
vzontini said:
HTC surely hopes it can turn something into an iPhone like success, but based on their track record I highly doubt it. People predicted lackluster 4S sales since it was an incremental upgrade but instead they sold more than ever. Apple is kicking butt with essentially two phones (the iPhone 4S was 89% of approximately 37 million iPhones sold in Q4). Again this is with an incremental upgrade. Apple's hardware margins on the iPhone 4 and 4S are excellent so they are raking in the bucks with these sales numbers.
I've not heard anything on the horizon from HTC that can compete with the iPhone 4S and with a major upgrade expected for the iPhone 5 my guess is the HTC market share will drop in 2012.
<rant>
It's hard to take but the folks like us at XDA are a very small market so there isn't a lot of business driver to provide open phones for people to hack on. I wish it were different but I don't see that changing. Too few care about S-OFF or root for it to be a profit driver and believe me when I say that HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. care more about profits than making XDA members happy.
</rant>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the thing though, maybe it's just me but I would like a phone that is rare. To me the iPhone hype is just a brand name. The phone is to common for me. It's nice to have a unique phone like the Amaze or the ReZound like they go much more in depth. However the Ville is an insult to the consumers who get a really high end phone to have it followed by what ever you call that. To me I think they need to stop monopolizing before they end up like Rockefeller. Don't toy with your consumers because they are what keep you a float.

[Q] Why aren't more people buying this phone?

I get that it's not a Nexus 4 and it's around $100 more off contract. I also get that the GS3 has more brand awareness, but this is a really awesome phone. I actually think the LG skin is good and adds a lot of functionality over stock Android.
I have a GS3, Note II, iPhone 5, and Lumia 920. This is my favorite phone out of all of them. The screen, feel in the hand, speed, and software touches make it almost a perfect device. Battery life has been good and my only real complaint is that the camera could have been better.
So what's holding it back? Marketing? I know LG has stumbled in the past, but this is not one of those times. I honestly probably wouldn't have even thought to buy the phone if not for the article about Consumer Reports rating it above the iPhone 5 and GS3 in customer satisfaction. I had to see what it was about and fell in love with it right away in the store.
As it stands, I couldn't recommend this phone more highly to people on AT&T who want an Android phone. I would definitely recommend it over the GS3, and that's saying a lot. The lack of activity in these forums, along with the sparse development tells me that it's definitely not getting into enough hands, and that's unfortunate.
LG's has a rather tarnished reputation as far as smartphone is concerned, they've had long lines of disappointing and mediocre mid-tier releases over the years plus poor record of software updates. Even with a phone like OG, it's going to take awhile to reboot their image.
mickey4mice said:
LG's has a rather tarnished reputation as far as smartphone is concerned, they've had long lines of disappointing and mediocre mid-tier releases over the years plus poor record of software updates. Even with a phone like OG, it's going to take awhile to reboot their image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuff Said.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
It's got 1M users, so I'd say it's selling well for a phone not made by Apple, Samsung, or HTC.
xboxfanj said:
It's got 1M users, so I'd say it's selling well for a phone not made by Apple, Samsung, or HTC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's definitely encouraging, but it could be much better and the forums are a ghost town comparatively.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_briefly_makes_it_2nd_top_phone_manufacturer_in_the_us-news-5371.php
I've not been a great fan of LG until this phone. I briefly considered that 3d camera phone from 2011 on AT&T that LG made, but ultimately chose the SII (and I made the right choice; I was one more f-ed up phone from buying an iphone). This phone impressed me in reviews and in stores (the demos blew me away). I chose it against the SIII and the One X and other flagship phones due to it matching what I wanted. I loved most of the SIII, but I hated that it had a physical home button. The one x seemed nice, but I didn't like non expandable storage and an unremovable battery. The only thing I had against the LGOG was the battery being built in; however, everything else about it sold me. I feel that LG has finally made a phone worth it (2 phones counting the Nexus), and have the potential to beat Samsung. However, this is an uphill battle for LG. I personally have known people to pick the SIII just because Samsung is the most widely known. LG will have to fight against that in order to be purchased. Plus, people are more impressed by expensive phones, and sometimes buy the expensive ones because they assume those are the best. I really think that that, oddly enough, is also contributing to the LGOG having slightly lower sales numbers.
Tl;dr
LG has a fight with Samsung due to name recognition, and price drops may have had a negative effect. Many customers don't research phones thoroughly, and buy from a certain brand, or the expensive ones (because you get what you pay for).
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
I'm happy for getting the phone for only $49, but I can't grasp the reason behind the price drop. OG is their only qualified flagship in years yet they are on sale at the price point of low-end giveaways. Granted it's probably just weekend promo but still, I find it odd to lower the price to this range in a non-holiday season.
mickey4mice said:
I'm happy for getting the phone for only $49, but I can't grasp the reason behind the price drop. OG is their only qualified flagship in years yet they are on sale at the price point of low-end giveaways. Granted it's probably just weekend promo but still, I find it odd to lower the price to this range in a non-holiday season.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the reasoning behind the price drop is building for the future, if you get your best phone in as many hands possible, the people who by it recommend the brand to others and are more likely to buy lg in the future when its time to upgrade.
charleswesde said:
I think the reasoning behind the price drop is building for the future, if you get your best phone in as many hands possible, the people who by it recommend the brand to others and are more likely to buy lg in the future when its time to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know if any of my friends are looking into a new phone I will put in a good word for the OG. And that is funny because when it came out I originally looked at it and then went "Nah, I still want the One X."
By the time I was able to upgrade, the One X+ was out, at double the price of the OG and I didn't want an outdated phone. Now I'm not saying the One X isn't good, it had just already been replaced by a refresher phone.
I am soo happy with this phone.
bleached45 said:
I know if any of my friends are looking into a new phone I will put in a good word for the OG. And that is funny because when it came out I originally looked at it and then went "Nah, I still want the One X."
By the time I was able to upgrade, the One X+ was out, at double the price of the OG and I didn't want an outdated phone. Now I'm not saying the One X isn't good, it had just already been replaced by a refresher phone.
I am soo happy with this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Tegra 3 isn't all that great for speed or battery and I can't stand HTC's broken multitasking.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
greyhulk said:
The Tegra 3 isn't all that great for speed or battery and I can't stand HTC's broken multitasking.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Half of the reason I made this decision.
I had a Sony Xperia X10 with an ancient 1Ghz snapdragon and then got an Asus Transformer with a Tegra 2...
So I was impressed more by Nvidia/Tegra at the time than Qualcomm/Snapdragon (I know, completely unfair).
But I had been reading everywhere that the S4 Pro was a beast and much better than Tegra 3s.
I don't like Sense anyways and I would have had a custom ROM, so the multitasking wasn't a big deal.
We have an extra gig of RAM to play with too. :highfive:
could it possibly be that the talk of the optimus g pro is throw the prices so low and being released soon.
bobafx said:
could it possibly be that the talk of the optimus g pro is throw the prices so low and being released soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt it. If the price stays low in states, doesn't bode well with G launch in Europe, unless LG do a dual tier launch of G & G Pro at the same time, but that's a remote possibility given G is set for March release in EU region.
bobafx said:
could it possibly be that the talk of the optimus g pro is throw the prices so low and being released soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's always something else around the corner. The Pro is likely months from hitting the U. S. on any carrier.
In all honesty, I'd still choose the G. I prefer the size and the 200mhz overclock would hardly be noticeable.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
greyhulk said:
There's always something else around the corner. The Pro is likely months from hitting the U. S. on any carrier.
In all honesty, I'd still choose the G. I prefer the size and the 200mhz overclock would hardly be noticeable.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely agree. And it won't be long until we are able to overclock our phones too.
Sent from my Nocturnal'd LGOG!
greyhulk said:
There's always something else around the corner. The Pro is likely months from hitting the U. S. on any carrier.
In all honesty, I'd still choose the G. I prefer the size and the 200mhz overclock would hardly be noticeable.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I've heard before, "Don't chase technology 'cause you'll lose."
droidiac13 said:
Completely agree. And it won't be long until we are able to overclock our phones too.
Sent from my Nocturnal'd LGOG!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention that 1080p display will require more processing power making the speed difference negligible.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Speaking critically of the android community for a brief second..
As much as people criticize Apple fans for putting too much value in brand name, a lot of Android fans are really overly zealous Samsung fanboys.
I won't say it's a bad brand or that the phones they make aren't nice.. But, taking a stroll to the Android subreddit you will find a lot of rabid Samsung fanboyism.
We hear less criticism of Samsung these days because they are just that popular.. still I remember as though it were yesterday people wouldn't shut up about how cheap the phones felt, how horrible various aspects of touchwiz were..
And sadly a lot of people won't even consider the LG OG because it's not Samsung.. but, if Samsung were to incorporate some of the LGOG features people would rave over it. I can see it now... slipping the LGOG specs and skin into a Samsung shell and hearing people brag and brag and act as though it Samsung were curing cancer.
Outside of that, honestly at $350 the N4 makes a hell of a deal. Even if you had a contract but, would like to keep your service without signing up for another 2 years would be a nice option.
Besides all of that? Well your average customer is told what to buy really. Speaking as a salesman I can tell you, if you don't know what you are buying, I'll be happy to tell you. (Granted I no longer work in sales but, it was a lesson learned.)
Edit: one final thought. I don't care because I'm honestly just that happy with it..... but, we still don't have an official cm10 port and that hurts us big time.

G2 rankings (T3 vs Stuff)

Hi,
I bought my G2 a month ago and I am very very satisfied with this phone. I coming from the Iphone (and could not imagine some years ago to have other phone as an Iphone). Last year I tried the Lumia 920 but was not happy with the restrictions and lack of apps in WP8. Then I tried the Nexus4 and it was a big surprise: I learned to love the flexibility of Android. I missed LTE so I switched to the HTC One until I broke the screen and realized the terrible hardware support of HTC.
I noticed a new phone on the top of Stuff's best smartphones list: the LG G2. I read several tests and decided to give a try. Now it is my phone and I am really happy with it. I like LGUI as well. Recently I use Reayglobe ROM on the phone.
The question I would like to discuss / hear your opinions is about ranking of this phone.
Stuff shortlists the G2 still on the first place, and chose the G2 as gadget of the year. Check this: http://www.stuff.tv/
At the same time, T3 ranks the G2 at the 6th place and starts the list with the Iphone 5S, which is in my view unbelievable. (Strange, but in the hard-copies I see different rankings as in the online version where the N5 leads).
Furthermore, in the T3 ranking the Nexus 5 is 2nd and the G2 is 6th (in the online version not even listed) however, the the G2 has everything the N5 offers, and the N5 has not many things we have in the G2.
Why is T3 so much biased for the Iphone? What is behind such ranking? Manufacturer support for the magazine? Are these magazines really independent?
Some reviewers will put the iPhone in first no matter what. Finger print reader and an updated camera... amazing! So innovative lol.
Honestly though... the moto x COULD have been the best phone of the year if they put a decent camera on it and a bigger battery. they didn't so oh well.. I've played with every phone out this year and the best over all imo is defiantly the g2. It has some things that could be better. But a solid package overall
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
I'm not sure if magazine reviews should be trusted as much as they are. Many reviews are slanted due to certain 'financial incentives'. And Apple allegedly has a very large advertising budget

LG G2 on TechCrunch's "The Best and Worst Gadgets of 2013" List

http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1Zg0xL
This article was made by Techcrunch and they placed the LG G2 in the "Ugly" section, with the likes of the Galaxy Gear.
I just cannot understand this. The LG G2 is by far the best phone of the year spec wise. In reality, it is an awesome phone. I love it to pieces. I believe it to be exceptional. So why is it that these guys focus on the buttons being on the back? In my eyes, that is no downfall. Sure it can take a while to get used to, but it shouldn't be responsible for making an exceptional piece of equipment non-exceptional.
Let's open this up to thoughts of the list and anything else you guys think.
Also, I would like to point out that Chromecast, for whatever odd reason, is not on this list. This list is turning out to be nothing but an infuriating advertising model.
It is preference based, just like you hate the Gear other people love it. The G2 is a great peice of hardware and by far the best this year. So dont follow other peoples opinions and enjoy this beast.
Sent from my LG G2
Those same people are the ones that buy every Samsung models that comes out and rates them 11/10 no matter how ****ty they are. Point is that many Samsung fans are upset by the fact that LG can make a flagship model that can compete with their best flagship for half the price. In contrast to Samsung, LG actually dares to make a quite radical change which Samsung has not done for very long. I do however believe that it will change next year.
I've always been a Samsung person from the days of dumb phones, going back to the original Galaxy right up till the Note 2 and never gave LG a fair shake really.
Recently got an LG G2 and I've been thoroughly impressed so far. Sold my Note 2 for roughly what I got the G2 for it.
There is nothing ugly about the G2 (especially the White colour). Whoever wrote that article must have cataracts.
I really like the back buttons, the up and down surface area makes pressing them quite comfortable.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
The buttons were long over do. LG was just the first to figure it out. Your fingers are always on the back of the phone anyways. Why not have a button where your fingers are buy default?
LG did everything right with the g2 except the slippery feel of it.
LG G2
jbaalson said:
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1Zg0xL
This article was made by Techcrunch and they placed the LG G2 in the "Ugly" section, with the likes of the Galaxy Gear.
I just cannot understand this. The LG G2 is by far the best phone of the year spec wise. In reality, it is an awesome phone. I love it to pieces. I believe it to be exceptional. So why is it that these guys focus on the buttons being on the back? In my eyes, that is no downfall. Sure it can take a while to get used to, but it shouldn't be responsible for making an exceptional piece of equipment non-exceptional.
Let's open this up to thoughts of the list and anything else you guys think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This sites are sponsored sites, I never take in consideration what this kind of sites writes, the same goes for phandroid, etc.
Most rubbish-est-est rubbish I've read in a long time.
Rubbish.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium HD app
Maybe is because Samsung pay then
Sent from my LG-D801 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I agree with everything on here. I have had five phones in the past 4 years.
Samsung
Motorola Triumph
Huawei
Motorola Droid RAZR M
HTC Droid DNA
LG
The Droid DNA was an amazing phone, but I love the G2. The innovation that went into this was very thoughtful and has won me over.
"Looks" are obviously opinion based so I could care less that they rated it as ugly. I however find the buttons unique and fully functional. It is really hard to find any tech writers that aren't biased but that's reality. I don't need a positively written article about the G2 to justify my purchase. I got it because I wanted it.
Sent from my G2
No worries. Even their avid readers are bashing on the article.
20degrees said:
The buttons were long over do. LG was just the first to figure it out. Your fingers are always on the back of the phone anyways. Why not have a button where your fingers are buy default?
LG did everything right with the g2 except the slippery feel of it.
LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I highly disagree; the buttons are an abortion on the G2, Flex, etc. It's different to be different. If it weren't for knock-on, I'd go insane.
Seriously, I bet Knock On was engineered after usability got ahold of the phone with the buttons on the back.
I'm so curious, I created a poll http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2595324
I think LG G2 is the "phone of the year."
After Knox security debacle, I doubt which enthusiast or modder will ever buy their phones? After you trip the Knox counter the warranty is permanently void.
TechCrunch is on Samsh*t's payroll.
With LG G2, I can flash custom roms to my heart's content and go back to stock in 10 minutes via an easy procedure. That's what matters to me the most.
What is so ugly about a phone with hardly any wasted space? Back buttons make a phone ugly?

So, who's excited? What phone are you coming from? What are your thoughts?

It seems like news surrounding this device is really, really slow. What's going on?
I've been a long-time Note user and have recently become disenchanted with the Note line. Although I am an S-Pen addict, I've always been more attracted to phones that have something really unique about them ... hence, my interest in the Phab 2 Pro. I had the LG Optimus 3D and loved the 3D features and screen, and the raw power of the phone, but the trend died out and LG stopped updating it.
Anyway, I'm not just interested in the Phab 2 Pro, I'm totally obsessed with it. Are there any other people out there who are as excited about this phone as I am?
I'm not a developer, so I'm going at this phone from a pure consumer vantage point. But I want to drum up some excitement or something ...
So what is your level of interest? Curious? Planning on developing for it? Planning on waiting in line on Day One?
I plan to be FIRST in line on Day One.
You aren't the only one. I check Google everyday...like everyday twice a day..I can't wait I've already set the money aside for it lol I want it so bad I wanted to pre-order it on August 1 just so as soon as bestbuy opens I can just walk in and grab it. Like best buy opens at 10 I'm trying to have it and be in my car by 10:10 lol
Sent from my LG-H901 using XDA-Developers mobile app
I'm going to get one Launch day! I am amazed, very little news on this device! I too have been trawling for updates, and not much to be found!
Definitely can't wait been interested in this phone since I heard the announcement, will be putting down my nexus 6 but will still be used for VR fun. I'm also interested in Project Ara from Google but not sure if AR will be part of modular phones. My main reason for getting this phone is a bigger screen than my nexus 6 (I'm a gamer) and AR obviously. On a side note Intel is coming out with a VR & AR combo headset next year no smartphone or PC required. You can also use your naked hands to interact in the VR world.
I will am also be coming from a Nexus 6 once the Phab 2 Pro comes out. Sure would be nice for a definitive release date to be set though.
Announcement will be very soon I'm assuming, here's a video posted today, it's from a Greek website I had to use Google Translate
Translated site - http://goo.gl/SuWcR3
Original site - http://goo.gl/ybYYyi
Note 4, here. I'm anxiously awaiting this, LG V20, and to see any other announcements. I WANT this size with the high resolution. Every other huge phone has been low end garbage. I'm a huge guy, I like the size. The camera/Tango setup looks nice, too. I can actually use it
I am also checking everyday. Do you have any idea if it will be released in UK or Ireland ?
Bad news - Delays!
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Leno...cial-Project-Tango-phone-gets-delayed_id85312
I would be SUPER excited if I had even a bit of hope that Verizon will carry this phone. I doubt it, and I'm stuck in a rural area with only VZW or USCellular as my options. I had a Nexus 6, bought a used 6P (love it!) on Swappa, and I'm extremely disappointed that the next "large" Nexus or Pixel is only 5.5"! Ugh. Maybe the V20 once it's rooted...
I'm definitely getting this phone when it eventually goes on sale. The best source of information I've been able to find for updates about the phone is twitter. From everything I've read so far, it may be out by late October or sometime in November. #Phab2Pro #WaitingNeverStops
This official looking marketing video would seem to confirm a November 2016 release.
Which marketing video would that be? I have seen quite a few, though none that hint at a date.
shdwphnx said:
Which marketing video would that be? I have seen quite a few, though none that hint at a date.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The video linked in my prior post. At the end it flashes very quickly "Available November 2016".
jeffx said:
The video linked in my prior post. At the end it flashes very quickly "Available November 2016".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah. uMatrix was hiding the video from me.
Clay Bavor, the head of Google's VR confirmed that the Phab 2 Pro is coming in November.
https://www.cnet.com/news/google-tango-lenovo-phab-2-pro-november/
I'll be honest, it's pretty disappointing to see that so many corners were cut on the supposed flagship Google "Tango" device.
Snapdragon 652 - This processor is on par with last gen technology. It's not bad, but it's not exactly great either. That being said, don't expect it to match the iPhone 7, LG V20, or Note 7 in terms of performance.
Micro USB - Not sure what they were thinking here either. Most if not all new devices are now USB-C, yet here is a device that's implementing a last gen hardware feature. They really couldn't afford to increase the price by a couple dollars to implement a USB-C port?
LCD Screen - And the biggest disappointment of all is the lack of an AMOLED display. Nothing says "cheap Chinese phone" more than the lack of an AMOLED, which is extremely sad given that even the low end Galaxy and LG devices now sport AMOLED screens. (Hell, even Pixel has an AMOLED.)
I don't mind compromising on the first two points, but the LCD screen was a terrible decision, especially for a device labeled as "professional".
As much as I'd love to support Tango, I'm afraid this device simply cannot compete with the current flagship offerings. The gimmick is also doesn't carry enough weight to buy into this brand only to suffer with a sub-par display and Lenovo's questionable update practice.
I really hope Tango succeeds so that something more premium is made, but thus far it's looking pretty bleak.
YandereSan said:
I'll be honest, it's pretty disappointing to see that so many corners were cut on the supposed flagship Google "Tango" device.
Snapdragon 652 - This processor is on par with last gen technology. It's not bad, but it's not exactly great either. That being said, don't expect it to match the iPhone 7, LG V20, or Note 7 in terms of performance.
Micro USB - Not sure what they were thinking here either. Most if not all new devices are now USB-C, yet here is a device that's implementing a last gen hardware feature. They really couldn't afford to increase the price by a couple dollars to implement a USB-C port?
LCD Screen - And the biggest disappointment of all is the lack of an AMOLED display. Nothing says "cheap Chinese phone" more than the lack of an AMOLED, which is extremely sad given that even the low end Galaxy and LG devices now sport AMOLED screens. (Hell, even Pixel has an AMOLED.)
I don't mind compromising on the first two points, but the LCD screen was a terrible decision, especially for a device labeled as "professional".
As much as I'd love to support Tango, I'm afraid this device simply cannot compete with the current flagship offerings. The gimmick is also doesn't carry enough weight to buy into this brand only to suffer with a sub-par display and Lenovo's questionable update practice.
I really hope Tango succeeds so that something more premium is made, but thus far it's looking pretty bleak.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that the micro-usb is outdated. But, at least i'm still able to use all my old charging cables.
Anyhow, I just received the Phab2 (base), and while this model has a different screen supposedly, it is very clear and bright. moreso than i was expecting. if the low end version is this good, the pro must be pretty swell.
alaska100 said:
I agree that the micro-usb is outdated. But, at least i'm still able to use all my old charging cables.
Anyhow, I just received the Phab2 (base), and while this model has a different screen supposedly, it is very clear and bright. moreso than i was expecting. if the low end version is this good, the pro must be pretty swell.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So where are you using this phone and on what service? I'm interested in the phab 2 pro but have never used a phone not supported by any carriers and they will never support a larger than 6 inch phone. It seems that this should work for at&t but I'm a little surprised people don't talk about the lack of carrier support a little more. I wonder if that is why it got delayed. Lowes and Best Buy have to figure out how to sell unsupported phones to people who have never bought one.
justinernst said:
So where are you using this phone and on what service? I'm interested in the phab 2 pro but have never used a phone not supported by any carriers and they will never support a larger than 6 inch phone. It seems that this should work for at&t but I'm a little surprised people don't talk about the lack of carrier support a little more. I wonder if that is why it got delayed. Lowes and Best Buy have to figure out how to sell unsupported phones to people who have never bought one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as of now, i switched from a t-mobile(metro pcs) phone to this and am on 4g only in the US, Florida specifically. I will hopefully be going to at&t next week, assuming i have time. regardless, 4g has been enough for the time being, but i don't like paying for LTE and not getting it.
my guess would be that upon release, all models will become either an AT&T exclusive or at least be advertised by AT&T, but i still can't even confirm the LTE bands this phone uses. Lenovo tech support says 1900, 1700 and 700, but he had googled it, as they don't have spec data yet, apparently.

Categories

Resources