Looking for benchmarks from our new n6p. I've done antutu so far. On par with 5x. 45k ish. This is stock on the oldest/first factory image.
I realize our device does not bench great but I've been using it most of the day and it's very snappy more proof benchmarks don't mean much, but if we bench stock then unencrypted, and use custom governed we have something to compare to.
First quadrant
Geek bench
Apologies for the noob question. - but looking at the antutu benchmark screenshot, does it mean that a nexus 6 performs better than the 6p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You guys are getting low benchmarks...
Ran antutu yesterday and got 57k, and 1310/3950 in geekbench.
Got 62410 in AnTuTu..
?? i get 45k with my 2013 nexus 5, does it heats up or it throtles down too much?
Got this on mine.
Androbench...The NAND is WAY faster than the Nexus 6.
suvo_bh said:
Apologies for the noob question. - but looking at the antutu benchmark screenshot, does it mean that a nexus 6 performs better than the 6p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a chance , this phone hasnt stalled once for me yet
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
italia0101 said:
Not a chance , this phone hasnt stalled once for me yet
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's an obvious relief
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Around 50k?? My OPO gets 48k-49k stock.
Those 62K is more on par of what I expected to see.
Would love to see more benchmark scores. I'm waiting till end of Nov for mine.
Rev.Krazy.X said:
4700?? My OPO gets 4800-4900
Those 6200 is more on par of what I expected to see.
Would love to see more benchmark scores. I'm waiting till end of Nov for mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OPO is 1080, 6P is 2k. Working harder and using more resources to draw the extra pixels.
Batfink33 said:
OPO is 1080, 6P is 2k. Working harder and using more resources to draw the extra pixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man you quoted me before I edited my post for typo's lol
QHD shouldn't make that much of a difference. Note 5 and S6 have QHD and pulling 66K. Yes better processor but not 16k better.
Rev.Krazy.X said:
Man you quoted me before I edited my post for typo's lol
QHD shouldn't make that much of a difference. Note 5 and S6 have QHD and pulling 66K. Yes better processor but not 16k better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember the S810 is being throttled heavier than the Exynos also.
richport29 said:
Got this on mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! I was about to cancel my order (for the 3rd time). Whoops...... forgot that I started buying accessories to prevent me from canceling again! But glad to see good scores.
wayne8821212 said:
Thank you! I was about to cancel my order (for the 3rd time). Whoops...... forgot that I started buying accessories to prevent me from canceling again! But glad to see good scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every review and users are saying it's lightning fast but I guess if I downloaded an app that gave me an arbitrary number I would also cancel/sell my phone ?
Coming from a note 5, I don't notice any real world difference. Smoother with no bloat, no aggressive memory management. Runs great!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
suvo_bh said:
Apologies for the noob question. - but looking at the antutu benchmark screenshot, does it mean that a nexus 6 performs better than the 6p?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may have run that in the first ten minutes of first boot and it may not represent actual readings? Now I've had 1 day of use I ran the test again, however now I'm not encrypted.
Antutu:
Geekbench: https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/4014427
Stock, unrooted
Related
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
HarmonyFlame said:
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
planoman said:
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your honesty instead of bashing the device,enjoy your note because i know i'll enjoy mines
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
jpeg42 said:
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from a 900 quadrant score on my SGS4G to a 3.5k so yeah I am sure it will be souped up in no time.
When he opened the app drawer, ATT crapware.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
ICS
I wonder how much better the Note will get with ICS?
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
mron0903 said:
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
jpeg42 said:
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jpeg42,
Did you write the article? Nice job. The battery is something I am looking at closely before getting the ATT version. I have found 25-30% brightness more than adequate on my GNote and as you say it takes several cycles to see the full capacity on the battery. The other area I am interested in is Bluetooth. The International GNote has a BT that is superb! My skyrocket BT sucks and I am hoping it is not because of LTE. The LTE network in Dallas and Texas is top notch which is why I am considering the ATT model. Any insights will be appreciated.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
foxbat121 said:
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but I wasn't expecting such a huge difference considering that the att note is still a 1.5ghz phone. It's a little disappointing because my atrix benchmarks are around the same at a 1ghz clock speed.
I know rom development is going to be big with the note which is one of the reasons I'll be getting one, along with lte.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Benchmark and real world experience are two different thing. Qualcomm chip is 1-gen older than Exynos.
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Interestingly, Phone Dog just did an update on his 30 day challenge with the Note and just switched to the AT&T version. He's saying that in actual use, he feels like the Snapdragon has been faster than the Exynos. Granted, it's only been a day of use, but still interesting to hear from someone who's been using the International version for a few days and picks up the AT&T version.
http://www.phonedog.com/videos/samsung-galaxy-note-challenge-day-11/
Once we can freeze the bloatware, I'm sure its gonna fly! Even the international version would suffer with all of that installed...
Sent from my Dell Streak using Tapatalk
New Quadrant score for stock Intl. GNote
ucanthang29 said:
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is my stock Intl GNote on the new quadrant. Was a 4105 now 3753. As many are saying there are objective and subjective benchmarks. The app benchmarks are objective and the personal experience (Flipping the screens etc.) is subjective (Aaron on phone dog). Not sure what the ATT quadrant is, but in the subjective observations I have had on the videos, it looks fine and even snappy. Lisa on mobile tech review says they are comparable and that is good enough for me! lol! The Intl. GNote was not that snappy on screen transitions for a couple of updates but is pretty speedy now! The phones are comparable on the things I will use a phone for and for 90+% of us either model will be fine in performance in my opinion.
I'm thinking of upgrading to this device from a SGII. But I really want to be able to tell the difference if I'm going to make this upgrade. Would have went to a sprint store and tested this myself if that were possible.
I was curious and ran a quadrant benchmark and here's what I got
Almost identical as yours. Lol
____________
Just Flash It !!!
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know of a better way to test to see if something is upgrade or not?
I love the new resolution and screen size and increased ram but that isn't enough for me to upgrade.
Thanks to all who posted results.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
When I first got the phone they were much lower, quad was around 3100, wonder why, I didn't make any changes
Edit: oops on the antutu shot lol it was 6500ish
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Because benchmarks are so useful. The benchmark can drastically change depending on what type of storage you use or other factors that barely effect real performance.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cause it's fun to have big numbers!!
rgregg504 said:
When I first got the phone they were much lower, quad was around 3100, wonder why, I didn't make any changes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my benchmarks were all over the place, ranging from 3500 to 5000.
Here's mine, 16gb white us on sprint.
Thanks for the benchmarks. After reviewing the results I may have to pass on this one. It was either a sg3 or a psp and after seeing the gpu scores I'm going to go with the psp vita. I didn't really have a upgrade yet so I was actually considering either buying one off contract or buying a family members upgrade.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
numero9 said:
Here's mine, 16gb white us on sprint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess nicer phones do go faster haha
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6425/51292.png
As you can see here the nexus 4 scores much lower than the galaxy s3 running the dual core s4. These benchmarks shouldn't even be taken with a grain of salt if the dual core s4 out performs the quad core by such a large margin. Now I know this involves the 4, but I wonder if the same could be applied to the nexus 10. For example the nexus 10's sunspider benchmark is about half that of the chromebook and they have the same cpu at the same clock speed.
Look here how much higher the optimus g scores than the nexus 4.
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6426/51313.png
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6426/51314.png
My S3 is a quad not a dual. PS, note the resolutions?
MentaLrz said:
My S3 is a quad not a dual. PS, note the resolutions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know the international version is quad core, but it doesn't use the s4 quad. The tmobile galaxy s3 uses snapdragon s4 dual core. The resolutions are the same I believe due to the three buttons for home and such on the display. Also the resolution wouldn't affect sunspider or other cpu benchmarks.
On the nexus 4 the cpu under clocks itself because it gets too hot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
ian1 said:
On the nexus 4 the cpu under clocks itself because it gets too hot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't read anything where they mentioned the cpu underclocking itself. How can this be true if the optimus g is almost it's clone and doesn't have these issues? If I could get some links it would be greatly appreciated.
tcb4 said:
I didn't read anything where they mentioned the cpu underclocking itself. How can this be true if the optimus g is almost it's clone and doesn't have these issues? If I could get some links it would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is in that very (mini) review you posted from anandtech, I am a huge follower of them, just Ctrl+F the word hot, I bet you will find out where they mentioned that the nexus 4 runs hot.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
akash3656 said:
It is in that very (mini) review you posted from anandtech, I am a huge follower of them, just Ctrl+F the word hot, I bet you will find out where they mentioned that the nexus 4 runs hot.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I searched for the word hot in their review and it didn't find any results. Either way does it mention that it underclocks due to the heat?
I have to believe that the performance in only going to get much much better with future updates from Google.. The result clearly show how premature the kernel is for 4.2.. Show in the N10 and the N4
It's quite possible that the benchmarks produce BS results.
philosopher09 said:
It's quite possible that the benchmarks produce BS results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im with you this... I highly doubt the iphone 5 outperforms my S3.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Damn my infinity almost topped the iphone 5 in browser mark, here are some quadrant n sunspider. I was thinking of selling this beast 4 the n10 but nvm..
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Oh wait i did lol didnt notice by 6,000 points haaa iphone5 lol
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
hit173 said:
Oh wait i did lol didnt notice by 6,000 points haaa iphone5 lol
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, what's your clock speed?
I hope the nexus 10 gets a bump to 2.0 ghz by some dev. That just sounds killer.
tcb4 said:
Lol, what's your clock speed?
I hope the nexus 10 gets a bump to 2.0 ghz by some dev. That just sounds killer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.8GHz
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
hit173 said:
1.8GHz
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha, we'll I am tempted to pick up an infinity, but I really want the developer support that will come with a nexus device.
tkoreaper said:
Im with you this... I highly doubt the iphone 5 outperforms my S3.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in all honesty, i would not put it past the iphone 5 to beat the S3.
even if you ignore the benchmarks, which a lot seem to imply that the A6 gives even the 5250 in the nexus 10 a run for it's money in some (rare?) cases. (although the case of optimization argument may be made),
note that the PowerVR graphics chip in the iphone 5 is absolutely fantastic, as it seems apple are focusing more on bumping up graphics than CPU in the new A6.
(you should also bare in mind that it seems the A6 is A-15 based, compared to the A9 in the S3 international)
speaking of which. i'm pretty sure the dual core S4 in the S3 you have would be slower in most cases than the i9300 anyways,
so this idea that your s3 could beat the iphone 5 in raw power is a bit hopeful,
and definitely not in terms of games, loading apps ect, purely because of the whole iOS has less devices, ect ect.
Fissurez said:
in all honesty, i would not put it past the iphone 5 to beat the S3.
even if you ignore the benchmarks, which a lot seem to imply that the A6 gives even the 5250 in the nexus 10 a run for it's money in some (rare?) cases. (although the case of optimization argument may be made),
note that the PowerVR graphics chip in the iphone 5 is absolutely fantastic, as it seems apple are focusing more on bumping up graphics than CPU in the new A6.
(you should also bare in mind that it seems the A6 is A-15 based, compared to the A9 in the S3 international)
speaking of which. i'm pretty sure the dual core S4 in the S3 you have would be slower in most cases than the i9300 anyways,
so this idea that your s3 could beat the iphone 5 in raw power is a bit hopeful,
and definitely not in terms of games, loading apps ect, purely because of the whole iOS has less devices, ect ect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you may be right there, but I think the nexus 4's gpu is better than the one in the iphone 5. I mean look at glbenchmark, the nexus 4 has a higher fps running at a higher a resolution(egypt hd onscreen). Also the cpu is a quad core krait so I highly doubt the iphone can compete there. The only reason I bring this up is because you were claiming that the iphone 5 has a fanatastic gpu, when in reality it's very good, but I'm not sure it's the best.. You could argue that the iphone 5 scores higher in the fill rate and the triangle throughput, but I feel like these ones may be easier to rig as they are the ones that don't actually render a game.
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
ronschuck said:
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is the battery after flashing?
ronschuck said:
I was able to overclock my note 2 to 1800,,, benchmarked at 19206
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats actually a little low...bump your gpu up to 640mhz. that got me a best score of 20091.
Yeah I've seen a few others reach over 20,000.
See if your phone can benchmark with the GPU clocked at 800mhz. You'll see some good scores there
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
adrynalyne said:
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
adrynalyne said:
Meh.
DNA does more than 20k stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
By now isnt everyone's unlocked Note2 overclocked to 1800?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
lostnuke said:
By now isnt everyone's unlocked Note2 overclocked to 1800?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
droidstyle said:
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that's your secret to getting 7-8 hours on screen time - power saver mode lol. How low does power saver mode clock down the max CPU speed to?
EDIT: Never mind. Power saver brings the CPU down to 1100 Mhz lol Gosh.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
I think since Project butter, benchmarks and high power cpu's arent necessary. Unless you do a lot of gaming.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Yeah and it feels much slower in real usage, so who cares about synthetic benchmarks?
Exchanging the DNA for the Note 2 yesterday was the best decision I've ever made. This thing absolutely smokes the DNA in real world performance, most importantly getting around the UI. And the battery life kills it too.
Other than the very sharp screen, the DNA has absolutely nothing going for it compared to other high end smartphones. Not to mention mediocre battery life and laughable storage space. Sense is still awful after all of these years as well. Very slow and heavy.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To each their own. I've had both, and I can tell you the Note 2 isn't faster. You just have to look past the animations speeds.
Gahh Its Lee said:
I do not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do not agree that the DNA has higher benchmarks stock?
Alrighty then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34670749&postcount=32
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34671231&postcount=34
That was before kernel source released.
droidstyle said:
agreed! benchmarks really dont mean much to me...and if i had to guess adrynalyne was just trolling because he hates these type of threads. the lg optimus g breaks 20k easily aswell but i would never own one.
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
actually i keep mine at stock clockspeed with powersaving turned on...plenty fast and it nets me killer battery life. currently at 18hrs up time, 4hr15min screen on, 53% battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got it, friend. That was exactly my stance
adrynalyne said:
To each their own. I've had both, and I can tell you the Note 2 isn't faster. You just have to look past the animations speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, keeping benchmarks out of it, how is the DNA faster? In which areas? I have also owned both and it wasn't faster at all for me.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
The DNA's gpu is much better. I'm sure within the next couple of years that will show with games that will be coming out. On the other hand, I'm sure the Note 2 will still be able to play them with some settings turned down, and the DNA will only be able to hold a couple at a time.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Ok, keeping benchmarks out of it, how is the DNA faster? In which areas? I have also owned both and it wasn't faster at all for me.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, to each their own. I didn't say the Note 2 was slower, nor did I say the DNA was faster. Read more carefully please and be objective.
flaring afro said:
The DNA's gpu is much better. I'm sure within the next couple of years that will show with games that will be coming out. On the other hand, I'm sure the Note 2 will still be able to play them with some settings turned down, and the DNA will only be able to hold a couple at a time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I saw the Note 2 has the Mali 400 MP. Isn't that the same GPU that's in the Galaxy S3? If so, I wonder why Samsung didn't 'up' the specs in that department.
DroidOnRoids said:
Yeah, I saw the Note 2 has the Mali 400 MP. Isn't that the same GPU that's in the Galaxy S3? If so, I wonder why Samsung didn't 'up' the specs in that department.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not ready for rollout to cellular devices.
adrynalyne said:
You do not agree that the DNA has higher benchmarks stock?
Alrighty then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34670749&postcount=32
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=34671231&postcount=34
That was before kernel source released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Na I was just being an ass. I respect you a ton I rarely argue anything. To each their own I dont care about benchmarks but some people do.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Hi guys, I am lucky enough to have got one today. Only been using it about 6 hours. So far so good. What do you want to know?
Pictures, price, and where you bought it from?
How is the battery life compared to other flagship devices?
Hi, I didn't buy it. I work for a mobile network. Battery I don't want to comment on yet. Only used one day but it's ok so far. I do love the design and size though and it's fast
Does it support wireless charging?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
wildlime said:
Hi guys, I am lucky enough to have got one today. Only been using it about 6 hours. So far so good. What do you want to know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plz after a full charge let us know total screen on time from 100 to 1%
Camera has hdr?
How is the responsiveness of touchwiz?
abuleen said:
Does it support wireless charging?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No wireless charging
I am intrigued by the GFXbench scores. Can you run the full test and post the scores?
I look for the wallpaper used on this photo
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
---------- Post added 17th August 2014 at 12:01 AM ---------- Previous post was 16th August 2014 at 11:48 PM ----------
Does it have the ultra power saving mod???
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Does this have the finger scanner, and for the hopes, is the u.s. getting this octa core? I am really interested. I still have a gs3
It has finger scanner and ultra power save mode.
How is the battery life?
@radioxmen
I have extracted the wallpaper, even in Full HD
https://flic.kr/p/oM2ZZw
Battery life.
Battery life.
Battery life.
This is the main thing you need to test as it will be the show stopper if it cannot perform. Lovely design. Great looking phone but much less battery power - being thinner - than other similar devices. Most devices these days are coming in with well over 2000mah and even up to 3000mah on larger smart phones. This has a mere 1860mah which is a big concern. It's Lithium Polymer rather than Lithium-ion though right?
Some thorough battery tests would be awesome.
Also, can you run Antutu benchmark? Can download and run for free from play store easily. Gives a good idea on performance.
How is the Touchwiz interface. Any detectable lag? Any new features we should know about? What is the camera like?
Thanks. And when will this be available to buy and at what price in UK?
RS050377 said:
@radioxmen
I have extracted the wallpaper, even in Full HD
https://flic.kr/p/oM2ZZw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you very much it is very nice of you
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
coursemyhorse said:
And when will this be available to buy and at what price in UK?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In india online stores listed it for INR 42000 which is equal to $700
wildlime said:
Hi guys, I am lucky enough to have got one today. Only been using it about 6 hours. So far so good. What do you want to know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With you having one, can you make a system dump, upload it and share it with us?
(Don't know if this one will work... http://www.ehow.com/how_12211911_system-dump-android.html )
Yes has.fingerprint sensor
Is there a projected price for this model? maybe in the $500 range since the s5 is $600.
CLARiiON said:
I am intrigued by the GFXbench scores. Can you run the full test and post the scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Coming right up!
CLARiiON said:
I am intrigued by the GFXbench scores. Can you run the full test and post the scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
limestar said:
Coming right up!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attached. Not sure if these are any good or not.